Evolutionists Have Fooled MILLIONS About This

Evolutionists are working hard to spread their perspective on dinosaurs, and churches often fail to teach us the truth on this subject. In this presentation, Bodie Hodge teaches us the truth about dinosaurs according to the Bible.
To learn more about this topic, check out Dinosaurs, Dragons, and the Bible by Bodie Hodge here: AnswersInGenesis.org/store/pr...
========
Answers in Genesis is an apologetics (Christianity-defending) ministry dedicated to enabling Christians to defend their faith and proclaim the good news of Jesus Christ effectively.
On our KZbin channel, you’ll find answers to your most pressing questions about key issues like creation, evolution, science, the age of the earth, and social issues. We desire to train believers to develop a worldview based on the Bible and expose the bankruptcy of evolutionary ideas and their implications.
You’ll hear from top teachers such as Ken Ham, Bryan Osborne, Dr. Georgia Purdom, Dr. Nathaniel Jeanson, Tim Chaffey, Bodie Hodge, Dr. Gabriela Haynes, Dr. Terry Mortenson, and more.
Please help us continue to share the gospel around the world: AnswersinGenesis.org/give

[@user-pf3zw5sl8o]

Psalm 40:4. Blessed is the man who makes the Lord his trust, who does not turn to the proud, to those who go astray after a lie!

[@Mmmmyown]

Those that go astray after a lie?

[@Mmmmyown]

Blessed are those that repent and ask for forgiveness after making mistake.

[@user-vn8so9rf3d]

So do I trust the written word of God (with myriad interpretations), or God's word written so clearly in Geology and Astronomy...

[@spikenomoon]

Dinosaurs hatch. Eggs could have been on the ark

[@user-vn8so9rf3d]

@@spikenomoon Which Bible verse mentions this?

[@TheTrueMariWho]

People used to believe that the krakens & leviathans were true, then they believed it was a myth, yet Giant Squids & Whales exist.

[@hylaherping9180]

Because it is physically impossible for a squid to lift its tentacles out of water onto a boat to drag it down.

[@TheTrueMariWho]

@@mountkeen8701 stories throughout histories have been embellished, however, “monsters” have always existed, to people who had no previous knowledge or education of said creatures. If you were a new young sailor who didn’t know science, and suddenly a giant salt water crocodile came after you, would you not think it was a monster?

[@TheTrueMariWho]

@@mountkeen8701 biblical events may have happened, but perhaps embellished or misinterpreted over thousands of years. Remember that old “telephone” game.

[@TheTrueMariWho]

@@mountkeen8701 it means that uneducated people have always tried to make explanations of things that they could not understand. You are trying to argue from a point that you believe I am religious, which is not true. I am agnostic.

[@TheTrueMariWho]

@@mountkeen8701 my original claims is that some anomalies that exist, and events that happened have been described throughout history by people whom may have been perceiving from a point of view that was uneducated in science. Also misinterpretation is always a huge factor. Science has proved that “monsters” exist, they aren’t “monsters”, once we have labeled them with a scientific name. A shark is not a “monster” to the educated, however, to the uneducated, it really kind of is a “monster”. Evidence exists that great floods did occur, this is a scientific fact, this does not mean it was an act of Poseidon. The parting of the Red Sea could have just been a shift in the tides.

[@tadcotadco6344]

In the mountains of Armenia my brother in law with a German geologist have found and took a photo of a petroglyph where a fight of 2 men against a typic tyrannosaurus is depicted. More precisely, one of the people lies on the ground wounded or dead, and the second protects him with a spear or stick from the lizard. The lizard, in fact, is not a Tyrannosaurus rex, but a smaller variety of it, which, judging from fossil records, was widespread in the Armenian highland

[@jarsa4099]

Hay manera de ver esa foto? Ya sea por tu cuenta personal o alguna pagina oficial? Esteria encantado de verla para compartirla con mis amigos

[@tadcotadco6344]

@@jarsa4099 unfortunately no. The photo belongs to the German geologist, and although I have it. I have no right to distribute it. But a typical tyrannosaurus type dino is depicted with a thick, long, but not tapering snout, standing on powerful hind limbs, with small upper limbs and a massive tail. Actually I never seen such convincing image of a dino. And its antiquity is beyond doubt. There are many other petroglyphs on that 3000m+ mount

[@sox8278]

Soooo one of those inhave proof but you cant see it situations..

[@tadcotadco6344]

@@sox8278 why cannot see? Fly here and I'll show you the photo. Alternatively, go to that mount full of petroglyphs and you will see the original

[@sox8278]

Sure you book the tickets and accommodation and then il be more then prepared to not only eat my words but proclaim your evidence.

[@jessejuell9833]

If dinosaurs were fossilized, should there also be humans and recognizable animals amongst them as well?

[@richardgregory3684]

Yup. But there aren't. We certainly have evidenc eof fossilised *mammals* that co-existed with dinosaurs. But no modern mammals. At all.

[@xMCxVSxARBITERx]

Maybe man didn't spread out across the whole world but stayed in relatively the same places. Then man would not be found amongst dinos. The bible is very vague when it comes to certain specifics. One thing it does say is that mankind did not spread out across the world after the flood, contrary to God's command.

[@shaunmeyer8822]

Yes, that is assuming that man spread across the whole world in only 1000 years(and starting from only 1 couple). But the places where dinosaur fossils are usually found are often far from where the "preflood" people probably lived.

[@richardgregory3684]

@@xMCxVSxARBITERx _Maybe man didn't spread out across the whole world but stayed in relatively the same places_ Except we know that humans DON'T. Humans are an expansionaist species. _The bible is very vague when it comes to certain specifics_ That's because the bible is a collection of made-up stories written by bronze age desert tribesmen.

[@richardgregory3684]

@@shaunmeyer8822 _But the places where dinosaur fossils are usually found are often far from where the "preflood" people probably lived_ Dinosaur fossils are found all over the world. Moreover, this wouldn;t explain why there are NO modern animals mixed in with dinosaurs. You are conveniently assuming that all humans and ALL modern animals all stayed in one place that no dinosaur ever went whlst they spread everywhere else? lol

[@sojourner1511]

Satan's favorite line, "Did God really say?"

[@yoeyyoey8937]

Wym?

[@user-pf3zw5sl8o]

Psalm 118:8. It is better to take refuge in the Lord than to trust in man.

[@jesusgavemeaids]

What about What Harry Potter said??? I know for a fact that Harry Potter is real because I have all the books.😂

[@andecap1325]

@@user-pf3zw5sl8o . `

[@andecap1325]

@@user-pf3zw5sl8o it is better to trust math than the wandering mind...

[@user-pf3zw5sl8o]

"The Lord is my rock, my fortress and my deliverer; my God is my rock, in whom I take refuge, my shield and the horn of my salvation, my stronghold." (Psalm 18:2)

[@--..-...-..-.--....]

My favorite quote from god is:

[@paulschuckman6604]

​@@--..-...-..-.--....I AM.... that's my favorite quote, best part is anybody who says the same is just as questionable being real as people who question if God is real.

[@lisabobo6657]

When you’re frustrated, just imagine T-Rex making your bed😮😂

[@user-kv2rq7sb2w]

I like the comic of a young t-Rex in school. Who’s mad he never gets called to answer a question, because his arms are to short for the teacher to see.

[@dustencross357]

Imagine T-Rex brushing his teeth...

[@sunkissed1974]

I laughed way harder at this than I should have. 😂

[@timothyelposar2571]

​@@dustencross357 Imagine a t-rex doing push ups

[@dustencross357]

@@timothyelposar2571 imagine two T-Rex trying to do a high five

[@rayfridley6649]

@28:38-The behemoth in Job 40:15 was translated to English before the term dinosaur appeared; Dinosaur did not come into the English language until 1841.

[@chrisrhodes2081]

The same time they started discovering all the Dinos 😂

[@californigirl]

I will always remember the circa 1500's illustration of a sheep herder clubbing an anklosaur that had crossed his path.

[@tone9358]

I don’t know what illustration your referring to, but if there were ankylosaurs alive less than 600 years ago. We would have substantially more record to them existing than just one illustration. I’d imagine you’ve misidentified it from a mythical creature or a weird drawing of a current animal

[@jockyoung4491]

@@tone9358 She said it was an illustration. she did not claim it was real.

[@sjl197]

Photo or it didn’t happen

[@Woopor]

Ankys are herbivores tho

[@Darren-su2gm]

​@@Woopormaybe he clubbed it because it was eating too much of the the sheep's food or bothering his sheep.

[@raymondrudolph503]

In 1979 my 6th grade teacher told us that she has more of an influence on us than our own parents do.

[@salvagemonster3612]

No she didn’t say that

[@antoniovela4125]

I taught for 30 years n never ever said that

[@raymondrudolph503]

@@antoniovela4125 I don't recall having you as a teacher

[@antoniovela4125]

Never said I was…just a response 🤦🏻‍♂️

[@raymondrudolph503]

@antoniovela4125 that cool I saw that most bullies in school were teachers

[@jadabrown1811]

I’m a mechanical engineer but one day I want to work with answers in genesis. They are a blessing over my life and calling. Praying for this ministry🤍

[@riskasaka3559]

I bvvi vrgfxfy

[@avi8r66]

They only hire liars, so if you are good with lying you might have a shot. They don't care about your specific credentials, just that you will pitch their nonsense with an air of authority given your credentials.

[@adelinomorte7421]

jadabrown ***oh !!! yes you are a "mechanical engineer" , most likely you will never drive an electric automobile.***

[@KiKi-tf8rv]

@@adelinomorte7421You do realize mechanical engineers actually make those electric vehicles, right?

[@montychiton]

I would say stay in technical engineering, something Bodie Hodge should have done as well...

[@chrisanderson5317]

Blank places on old maps used to read, "Beyond this point thar be dragons."

[@user-pf3zw5sl8o]

Trust in the LORD with all your heart and lean not on your own understanding; in all your ways submit to Him, and He will make your paths straight. (Proverbs 3:5-6)

[@tbong9293]

Amen

[@betsieswartz]

Nah

[@RC6790]

Trust in God and you, too can wear a belt buckle that says "God with us" as you join in a slaughter that killed 50 million people known as WWII and the best part is you never questioned anything until it was too late! So go on down that road that preaches that the bible is perfect and makes no mistakes even as it teaches the science (knowledge) that was all that was known over 4,000 years ago and with no changes allowed since then!

[@silkwoodart]

He not only makes paths straight, but Jesus also mows my lawn every Saturday.

[@tymz-r-achangin]

We Christians know we are to believe in God through faith. Its the atheists/evolutionists who teach their theories as facts for happening the way they claim, and then they most often expose their disgruntled adolescent attitude when we wont believe their theories. However these evolutionists refuse to tell us how matter has the ability to bring themselves in to existence, and how the properties of physics brought themselves into existence.

[@globalcoupledances]

By Mass-energy equivalence

[@junglelawman728]

Exactly, they don't admit to have a belief based on faith.

[@hylaherping9180]

It's very easy to get disgruntled when trying to explain the evidence for something when the person you're explaining it to has already made up their mind that they will only believe things by faith...

[@daniellarkins3849]

Except traditionally speaking theories are facts. The bible on the hand demands you believe in it and not question it or be punished.

[@junglelawman728]

@@daniellarkins3849 Lol, believing a magical bacteria appear from nowhere, inject time, bacteria builds computers and lands on the moon?? Sounds legit............!?

[@blake350z]

When the education system has failed you… you end up here on KZbin on this channel 😂😂 this might as well be an SNL Skit.

[@user-lj5oc8fk9s]

This is the education system of the future

[@amtheminer3803]

Im here due to the reconmended system

[@Mansplainer452]

Your prolific use of grammar is proof thereof.

[@Meatsacks]

We make toys and stories about dinosaurs for kids today that doesn't mean we are living amongst them. Science and religion shouldn't be enemies. Religion answers the question of why and Science answers the question of how. If the two conflict then we are getting something wrong. God bless

[@MO51MARRIED6yrAISHA]

JESUS is the same today, yesterday and forever.....Amen.

[@constipatedpotato3745]

Amen

[@newcreationinchrist1423]

Amen 🙂✝️🙏

[@tjsays8916]

He never changes! Amen. Our God is an amazing God

[@haggismcbaggis9485]

Someone told me He is going to be different when He returns. He is going to be like a lion and slaughter lots of people. There is a giant wine press in Revelation and all the bad people get their blood and guts squished out.

[@johnl4933]

Yes. A figment of Man's imagination.

[@APilgrimInAFallenWorld2030]

The great falling away! The world is falling away from Truth which causes them to deny reality and become deluded by their wicked imaginations. They are now starting to do all that their wicked imagination comes up with.

[@JB-yb4wn]

@@Legend-mg2ry Why yes it is!

[@betsieswartz]

If anything, god is way more far fetched than dinosaurs. We have found thousands of fossils detailing hundreds of species. The Bible does not substitute them.

[@funshine817]

Well said

[@crowrage8929]

Just like wicked book learning, and evil maths , and profound thought that doesn't include Bible studies. Using what God gave us is a sin.

[@WiseAsSerpentsHarmlessAsDoves]

Evolutionists fooled me my whole life, and that began with the love for dinosaurs as a kid

[@sjl197]

Hi, I’m a biologist. What aspects do you say fooled you? When I watch creationist videos this I see terrible misrepresentation of the science, even deliberately wrong. Sadly this then misleads people with little science background.

[@EQOAnostalgia]

Yeah they do that. They brainwash you with everything from a young age.

[@robertmyers6865]

I love dinos too, but it has NEVER changed my view of the Bible, and I love science also!!!

[@BrianJonesOneClearChoice]

@@sjl197 I find it so interesting that evolutionist use the word science to make it seem like there assumption is fact in reality science is a testing of assumptions to see if they are factual .. You can not do that so therefore it's not science! It's a theory! Yet Biblical information has been proven to be fact historically. One being the life and death and reresection of Jesus Historically proven.

[@sjl197]

@@BrianJonesOneClearChoice Hi. Well, evolutionary biology is a subset of biology, which is a subset of science. This is as much of a fact, and moreso that much of what you then claim to be factual. That said, let's perhaps shift first to where we can perhaps agree. I also think the bible contains much which can be seen as historical facts, especially in the new testament. Here, i mean many reported aspects that tie against (and hence supported by) other external evidence which independently is inline with same narrative like archeology, or less securely by other stated accounts, most notably those written by other authors. However, i would take pause to say that much said about the life of Jesus really does not seem to me as secure as you seem to favour. I would strongly disagree about your statement on the resurection as 'historically proven' - it absolutely is not proven. Firstly, the claim of resurrection after death is of course counter to (almost) any such event in humanity history - or even that of any animal. The idea of Jesus' resurrection is an extraordinary claim, which of course makes it so remarkable to Christians. However, it is not the only claimed case, as similar extrordinary claims exist for supposed resurrection for Osiris in Egypt, Tammuz in Mesopotamia, Quetzalcóatl in Mexico, etc. If stick to bible though, I find it amazing how easily forgotton Lazarus of Bethany became, even though he too was said to be resurrected. Anyway, to focus back on the beloved Jesus, what there is are essentially four different accounts, seemingly written many years later by people who were not directly involved in the events. Add in some scholars favor that the account of Matthew seems to largely adapted from Mark possibly earlier account, hence lacks independance. There's also a rather indirect statement by Paul to the Corinthians, that you might want to treat as eye-witness. Even if the accounts are independendant, each vary in several aspects of the narrative, which a modern court case in the western world would rightly treat with skeptisim and caution if such differing accounts were presented as evidence. So, i'm really not sure how you can jump from what's said in those differing (and possibly non-independant) accounts, mostly written long after the event, to somehow 'historically proven'. i really cannot fathom how you seem willing to gladly accept those as 'true' or in your words ‘proven’, yet seem so willing to dismiss evolution (or rather evolutionary biology) as unfounded? It partly seems you've partly misunderstood the scientific word theory is, if so let’s first address that. A theory in scientific terminology has been explained multiple times as a "well-substantiated explanation", "based on a body of facts that have been repeatedly confirmed", a concept which differs strongly from the common usage of 'theory' as more akin to a premise or a hypothesis. How we define science is more tricky, but your idea of 'testing assumptions' can be part of core concept of falsifiability. That's only one facet of science, but if using that then i would strongly disagree with you there too - much of evolutionary biology including all the core concepts have been subject to 'testing' in many various ways, and the concepts remain robust to the continued addition of new evidence from multiple sources. Your beloved "historically proven" resurrection is in essence five cases of testimony, only one as eyewitness. Modern psychology has repeatedly shown how unreliable eye witnesses can be due to failure of memory, bias, and even willful embelishment. Yet worse, four of your five sources are several years after the alledged event, at best interpreting word of mouth hearsay. So please, let's hear how you say any of that is 'historically proven'.

[@ermagherd1204]

I’m 44 years old. In 2nd grade around 1986 my teacher would read every morning from the Bible. She would read a lot of those Old Testament classic stories like Moses & the Exodus, Samson with his long hair, King David, etc…looking back…I’m thankful. This from a non-believer.

[@lucbos7516]

There is no god Grow up end stop believing in fairy tales

[@ermagherd1204]

@@lucbos7516 guess you never noticed I said I was a non-believer you dimwitted amoeba. Also it’s “and”…not “end”….come on, man…

[@gohan3448]

@@lucbos7516 if God is not real why waste your time talking about him?

[@lucbos7516]

@@gohan3448 Grow up and stop believing in fairy tales The earth is 5 billion years old and the universe 13,7 billion years old

[@lucbos7516]

@@gohan3448 How do we know that this point in time is exactly 4.54 billion years in the past? The most important tool for dating things is the half-life of radioactive atoms. Every radioactive atom has a so-called half-life. That is the time, when there is exactly a 50% chance that it fell apart. Quantum mechanically, it is impossible to predict exactly when an atom will spontaneously fall apart. We can only say something about the probability of an atom falling apart. Fortunately for these measurements, there are a lot of atoms. The time when 50% of, say, a billion atoms have fallen apart, is precisely known, by the law of large numbers. There are atom types that have half-lives of hundreds of millions of years or more. Well-known examples are uranium-235, uranium-238 and thorium-232 (the number after the element name indicates the number of particles in the atomic nucleus). Radioactive decay occurs in only a few well-known ways. For example, an atom can emit an alpha particle, i.e. a helium nucleus: the atomic number then drops by two and there are two neutrons and two protons less in the remaining nucleus. Beta decay is also common: an atomic nucleus then ejects an electron and thereby moves up one place in the periodic table. A well-known series of decay reactions is that of uranium-238 in lead-206. Crystals of a pure uranium-containing mineral naturally contain no lead, because lead behaves chemically very differently from uranium. The more lead there is, the older the mineral must be. The amount of lead in uranium-containing meteorites relative to the amount of uranium is so high that they have been dated to be around 4.54 billion years old. Meteorites have formed in the protoplanetary disk. Therefore, we know that this disk existed around 4.54 billion years ago and so the Earth must be slightly younger than this date. The oldest known minerals on Earth, zirconium crystals from the Jack Hills of Australia, and where these measurements were taken, were not much younger, at around 4.4 billion years old. Hence we can say with great certainty that the earth is between 4.5 and 4.6 billion years old.

[@BionAvastar3000]

It's crazy to think that Noah was still alive during Abraham's time. I suddenly realised this going through the ages the other day. Just incredible.

[@BionAvastar3000]

@@ji8044 Go back and add up the ages.

[@avi8r66]

@@BionAvastar3000 Abraham and Noah were both fictional characters. Noah was a character invented based on the story "The Epic of Gilgamesh" while Abraham was invented to be the founder of the newly forming hebrew culture. They were fast and loose with the facts back then.

[@billyb7465]

@@BionAvastar3000 How does adding up the ages prove that they were real?

[@BionAvastar3000]

@@billyb7465 You said it was untrue that Noah was living during Abraham's times. If you go back and add the ages, it works out that they did live contemporaneously

[@BionAvastar3000]

@@avi8r66 No the epic of gilgamesh is a corruption of the true Noah account. For thousands of continuous years, we knew about the noah account from the bible, and only recently rediscovered the gilgamesh version.

[@johnlewis6792]

No mention is made as to why dino bones are only found in those three strata (Jurassic, triassic and cretaceous). I would like to hear an explanation for that.

[@jockyoung4491]

Because that's when they lived. But if you are asking creationists, they would simply deny everything.

[@TheArcturusProject]

I think the time scale they have is wrong. The method they use for dating how old something should be according to its depth is inaccurate.

[@johnlewis6792]

@@jockyoung4491 thank you for taking the time to respond. I am a creationist and I believe the scientific evidence points to design rather than an unguided process of macro-evolution. I believe there was a universal flood and that geological evidence world wide points to this as well. I believe the radioactive dating system has some flawed assumptions (as TheArctursProject in the earlier reply mentions). However, I have not yet heard a good explanation for the ordering of the fossils in the different strata (from either evolutionists or creationists).

[@johnlewis6792]

@@TheArcturusProject thank you for taking the time to respond. My question is not about the dating methods used for the different strata in the geological column, but the ordering of fossils. Why do all dinosaurs show up in these strata after amphibians and before mammals? I believe the Noachian flood took place as recorded in the Bible, but I have not heard a good explanation yet as to why we see the ordering of the fossils that we do.

[@ajishmathew007]

​​​what evidence you have to put forward to prove your creationsam? In flood all animals perished including blue whales and turtles? 😂😂😂

[@lisabobo6657]

Very good and lively teaching!! First time listener and he’s explaining things very well. I don’t like speakers that talk slowly, loses my interest. Learning some new truths is fun!

[@dodgecrockett3474]

Fred, I know what you mean. When speakers talk slowly, it gives the audience more time to reflect and think critically. If the presenter had allowed time for a Q&A session at the end, I wonder if that would have ruined his presentation.

[@lucbos7516]

There is no god Grow up end stop believing in fairy tales

[@lisabobo6657]

@@lucbos7516 the ‘fool’ hath said in his heart there is no God.

[@lisabobo6657]

@@lucbos7516 you will stand before Him as your prosecutor and judge.

[@rzella8022]

Yes, I prefer speakers who speak steadily and rapid pace. Otherwise my mind wanders and I will stop watching.

[@johnmoyers404]

I love ❤️ you fellow WARRIORS FOR CHRIST!

[@crusadercatwoman02]

Amen!

[@eudyptes5046]

If this bunch of uneducated losers is all he has ...

[@GatorBoyCL]

@@eudyptes5046what,you?

[@valerieprice1745]

The answers are in Genesis. Just so you know, there are rough collies and smooth collies. Smooth collies have short hair. They don't usually cross breed them,because the puppies can come rough or Smooth, but they will sometimes have an intermediate coat, medium length. Rough collies have lost the short hair information. Smooth collies have lost the long hair information. What this presentation is teaching is valuable information. It's true.

[@jockyoung4491]

Yes, changes in dog breeds are a good example of evolution.

[@valerieprice1745]

@@jockyoung4491 not so. Dog breeds are an example of natural and artificial selection, NOT evolution. Evolution posits that somewhere back in Lyell's famously extremist "deep time ", a strange form of ancestor produced celery seeds and also produced puppies. No matter how many billions of years you want, there is still ZERO chance of inert matter "coming alive ", like in the cartoons you were watching while you should have been reading your Bible, and there is ZERO chance of celery having puppies.

[@burnforeverandever]

Genesis says the earth is a flat disc with a dome over it covered in an expanse of water. It was clearly written people who didn't know anything about the world

[@jameslyons532]

And given enough time, if bred separately, they will lose the ability to interbreed and be two different species. Wow, evolution makes sense when you stop reading the Bible.

[@ramonortiz7462]

Let me get this straight.. You ACKNOWLEDGE that the big bang is incorrect and that evolution is blatant lies yet for "reasons" you do believe that a big bang created a giant spinning spherical water world space ball spinning faster than a BULLET at the EQUATOR when the Bible states the earth is firm and IMMOVABLE!!

[@johnnemeth825]

Jesus open their eyes and heart to the Truth of God's Holy Word the Bible in Jesus name I pray 🙏 Amen 🙏

[@avi8r66]

If you are going to pray for anything please pray for these people to stop lying to you.

[@johnmulhern2833]

Good man....open with a joke 🤣🤣🤣

[@frosted1030]

"Jesus open their eyes" Your eyes have to be well shut to buy into a justice by proxy scam that clearly failed even in your own fables.

[@daniellarkins3849]

No one except fundamentalists Christians watch these videos. Most Americans who believe in god also believe in some form of evolution including myself.

[@avi8r66]

@@daniellarkins3849 Unfortunately these fundamentalists are politically loud and active, working to change the science curriculum of the educational system. If they can't get their garbage into the science text books they want the real science flagged as 'just one of many theories' to make it easier for them to recruit those kids into their fundamentalist ignorance later. Edit: They also tend to have a lot of overlap with hate preachers/groups, like Kent Hovind, Matt Powell, Grayson Fritts, and Steven Anderson.

[@eluclid]

that's not a edmontosaurus, idk what that thing is, but whatever it is, it's not a edmontosaourus, not to mention, no arms on the drawings. for the second one, "Have you ever watched the clouds go by and thought you saw one in the shape of an animal, or seen the "man in the moon"? These are examples of pareidolia-seeing what we believe to be a significant shape or pattern when it isn't really there. This phenomenon also explains the "dinosaur" on Kachina Bridge. Upon close inspection by Senter and Cole, the "sauropod dinosaur" turned out to be made up of distinct carvings and mud stains. It is definitely not a depiction of a single animal, and, viewed in detail, it looks nothing like a dinosaur. The separate carvings and mud stains only look like a dinosaur to those wishing to find one there."-Riley Black, Smithsonian magazine. Not to mention the original, isnt connected like what was depicted in thsi video, the legs didnt look like legs, more of a smudge of mud lol. Third one, those dont even look like wings, looks more like mountains/hills and a river and a big bird. fourth, now you tell me, what dinosaur is that? Fifth, that looks like no dinosaur I've ever seen. sixth, everyone belived in dragons back there, yet there's no proof of them, if i draw a unicorn having tea, does that mean i saw a unicorn having tea? "a fossil reptile of the Mesozoic era, in many species reaching an enormous size." "A more handy general definition would go something like this: Dinosaurs are extinct animals with upright limbs that lived on land during the Mesozoic Era (252 to 66 million years ago). This would basically capture how paleontologists long thought about dinosaurs. With a few exceptions (some pesky early crocodile relatives with upright limbs, for example), it still works if you’re thinking about “classic” dinosaurs: Brontosaurus, Stegosaurus, Triceratops, Tyrannosaurus, etc." by national park service "what-makes-a-dinosaur-a-dinosaur" that's what defines a dinosaur, not what ever you just said.

[@aahhhhhhhhhhhhh]

Believe in God or not this comment is factual info. these people are discrediting their beliefs by being so ignorant and its sad.

[@jamiedelaughter1320]

I believe things like this and many others are God calling the Church to sanctify itself and the world to turn to Jesus. We are headed for very troubling times.

[@georg7120]

Actually it's not a mistake, it is a blatant lie!

[@avi8r66]

@@ji8044 Brodie is paid to ignore data that doesn't fit the YEC narrative.

[@baileypanama]

@@ji8044 DNA code doesn’t change codes to cause anything to evolve

[@baileypanama]

@@ji8044 you don’t understand DNA. Your evolutionist teachers failed to tell you that no DNA in this planet can evolve to a new DNA code. Or has it ever been observed to change into a new DNA code to cause a fish to grow legs. The information is not there. In the human race all you will get is humans probably, lighter, darker, short, tall, slanted eyes, small eyes, but the DNA code will never evolve or add new information to cause a human to change into a monkey. The information is not there and it was never there. You’ve been lied to, that’s why you’re on this Christian creation channel because you don’t even believe your own theory of evolution so you’re looking for answers

[@Insultedyeti712]

@@baileypanamaWhat does that have to do with what he just pointed out? Unrelated.

[@baileypanama]

@@Insultedyeti712 pointed out? But can you refute what I said? The answer is no. You will never be able to add information to any genome to cause any creature on this earth to grow a totally new limb 🦵. You, billions, trillions of years, scientist can never write the codes, y’all don’t have that power or intelligence and never will. Time cannot bring organism to life from the dead. Evolution is dead it’s been dead. People like you hold on to it because it’s your religion. To believe non life came to life from the dead.

[@nikkistump3480]

Y’all must visit the Ark Encounter in Kentucky! It’s absolutely astounding!

[@richardgregory3684]

That's one word for it.

[@betsieswartz]

No

[@mjbowman2004]

When God said, "Let there be light," I don't suppose it was a quiet moment. Call it a bang if you want.

[@user-vn8so9rf3d]

Struggling here as when I found faith, many church leaders told me I couldn't believe in Evolution, Astronomy, Genetics, etc., and become a Christian... So, under this timeline, when did the Ice Age/s occur, and for how long? Why do we have Biblical writings on the Flood, but no mention of larger events such as the Chicxulub impact crater, and now the far larger Deniliquin impact crater? Please can someone put these on the timeline?

[@hongotedesco8931]

"..many church leaders told me I couldn't believe in Evolution, Astronomy, Genetics, etc., and become a Christian..." You just need to ignore those church leaders. They are simply wrong.

[@crowrage8929]

There are so many impact events that they know nothing about, from the Bible.

[@shenanigan3083]

It is corrupt in my opinion... $$$

[@gbh_events]

Just about every ancient society talks about dragons (Europe, Africa, South America, Australia, Asia, UK etc.). None of them talked about dinosaurs. Seems like dragons are more likely than dinosaurs by that metric.

[@BBCTopgearfan]

The word Dinosaur wasn't invented until 1841. How could they talk about them. However, dragon was a word that had been in use. So it what was used.

[@nickmeschke2474]

The word dinosaur wasn't created until 1841 dragon was the only word they knew to describe what they say! Research and learn history before you comment

[@billjohnson9472]

ancient societies discovered fossils and made up stories about them because they look like fantastic animals. the idea that dinosaur fossils are a recent discovery is totally false. it is just that no one understood what they are.

[@StanGraham1]

​@@nickmeschke2474, good response Nick! Couldn't have said it better myself.

[@jeromelacey4067]

😂 So on the basis that because people drew dragons=dragons existed, does that mean unicorns, elfs, fairies, minotaurs, all the God's of mythologies, etc... existed, too ?

[@klouis1886]

If you add in the supernatural it is no longer science

[@JB-yb4wn]

You are wrong! It becomes "Christian" science. 🤣

[@crazypeopleonsunday7864]

After watching those last few minutes of the video: "Holy cow, there really *could* be a Jurassic Park!" Also, fun fact(s): there's a legend of a creature called the Kongomoto that lives in the Congo Rainforest in Africa which is described as being just like a pterosaur. In fact, one man who claimed to be attacked by a Kongomoto described it, was shown an illustration of a pterosaur, & claimed that it was the creature that attacked him. Additionally, a type of fish called the Coelacanth which lived at the same time as the dinosaurs (in the regards of believers in secularism) was believed to be long extinct with them... until it was discovered in the modern age by deep sea fishermen (that is, fishermen who fish for deep sea fish) off the east coast of Africa.

[@crazypeopleonsunday7864]

@@LordMathious Oh, I know there isn't, nor will there likely ever be. I was just joking around about that part. The stories and reports about the "kongomoto(s)" are true, though (in the sense that there *are* stories and reports about kongomotos, not necessarily that those stories and reports are true).

[@hylaherping9180]

Coelacanths are an order of fish, not a single species. The two species alive today are not anything like the many species found in the fossil record. The large gap between ancient and modern Coelacanths is due to how rare fossilization is, and the problem of where the fish lived. Since they only live in deep sea caves, we'd only be able to find them throughout the gap if deep sea cave systems eroded in every layer between the Mesozoic and modern periods. Even then, there'd still be no guarantee the fish would even have fossilized in spots we'd be able to dig in.

[@user-kr8pt4iu6g]

And the movie “Journey to the Center of the Earth”. Watch it it will amaze you totally! ❤️🌈🙏🌎🎶

[@hylaherping9180]

@user-kr8pt4iu6g That and Ice Age 3 are not documentaries, they're fiction.

[@user-kr8pt4iu6g]

Have you seen the movie “ The Journey to the Center of the Earth?” It will blow your attitude. You will be amazed at what you see. Amen. ❤️🙏🌈🌎🎶

[@ITPalGame]

9:12 the "serpent" is more a title, a description. The deep roots of the name go back to "burning" or "hot like molten brass", which brings up images of the cherubim and seraphim seen by Ezekiel, Isaiah, and many others.

[@ashwayn]

serpent snake is a GODDESS symbol and in the second human creation myth in bible?? O yes Eden was second first was on 6th day and its pleural GODS inc a Goddess you should read the bible

[@ITPalGame]

@@ashwayn I'm perfectly capable of using various Biblical lexicons that explain the meanings of words. "serpent" in Genesis referring to the fallen one is a descriptive title, with roots in a "burning" as poison burns, or hot, glowing metal, as the appearance of the cherubim and seraphim seen that appeared to be glowing like hot brass.

[@joshuajoshua7257]

What is the root of nachash. Same?

[@ITPalGame]

@@joshuajoshua7257 Using Strong's, you can trace the roots for a better idea. There were also people who were named similar. Perhaps they were like "Cartwright" or "Smith", with roots in brass / copper forging 😁. I can copy / paste the entries later. They need cleaning up for the proper paste formatting.

[@ITPalGame]

@@joshuajoshua7257 From the top: "serpent" in Genesis 3.1 - h5175. נָחָשׁ nâḥâš; from 5172; a snake (from its hiss): - serpent. AV (31) - serpent 31; 1. serpent, snake A. serpent B. image (of serpent) C. fleeing serpent (mythological)

[@barchengerjeremiah]

Sort of sheds a different light on the idea of the Loch Ness monster being some type of plesiosaur, doesn't it.

[@billjohnson9472]

how about the Yeti, if the loch ness monster is a dinosaur then Yeti is a pre-human species, right?

[@haggismcbaggis9485]

That was until the people responsible for the Surgeon's photograph admitted they used a toy submarine and a fake head.

[@johnmoyers404]

Can we put poor Nessie out of his misery? It’s been proven the best photo was a hoax by a physician 👨‍⚕️ and 2 friends with a rubber glove and a child’s toy submarine! Plus the structure of the lock makes a critter his size IMPOSSIBLE to inhabit What about the NEPHILIM buried in my birth area southwestern OHIO Worshipped by native Americans? Does anyone who believes as I DO that Lucifer and 1/3 of the lesser Angels cast out in the failed attempt to destroy GOD were “good buddies” in the relative garbage heap Lucifer led them into? Ever consider they fought for destroying loyal humans - and tribes via caves still worship 15 feet PLUS tall entombed hominid creatures that I have been two in Adam’s county OHIO I am telling the truth Let the reader UNDERSTAND In Jesus’ NAME AMEN

[@timspiker]

@@haggismcbaggis9485 But... the story already existed before that. How did the people who made the story come up with the story? Humans can't make stories of things they don't know. So in order to come up with the idea of a dino in a lake, someone must've known what a dino was in a time where there supposedly were none.

[@haggismcbaggis9485]

@@timspiker The story originated in the 6th to 7th century from an embellished account of St. Columba saving 2 men from an aquatic monster, even raising one of them from the dead. The plesiosaur is likely a modern interpretation. Yes, ancient people had ideas about sea monsters.

[@darthakers6981]

I want to listen to the rest of the lecture

[@--..-...-..-.--....]

It ended with him saying "just joking I made it all up god doesn't exist"

[@gtrdoc911]

Please explain how God made Eve from a rib, how Jesus turned water to wine and walked on water, continental drift and the creation of the Himalayan mountains, radioactive decay, I could go on and on. The Bible is so blatantly wrong on so many things. As an electrical engineer you should know all of your knowledge has been gained from human discovery through the scientific method.

[@solotove]

@@gtrdoc911 They're miracles lol that's one of God's shticks considering he's omnipotent

[@iLLEly0n]

@@gtrdoc911 Genesis took the “made Eve from a Rib” from an older Sumerian creation story where Enki ate a forbidden fruit and got sick, and the earth mother goddess made a female goddess Ninti from his rib, to nurse and care for him… prior to him eating this fruit there was no sickness or death in the paradise land of Dilmun (basically Eden)…. the Sumerian tablets including this story are at least several hundred if not over a millennium older than any of the original source documents that the Bible was formed from during its composition/editing.

[@gtrdoc911]

@@iLLEly0n thanks for that story. Basically Judeo-Christian Holy tales are obviously man made literature adapted from older tales. Hard to believe in 2024 some people take that info as fact.

[@KillingfalkONroblox]

When im down, i go to AIG comment sections and look at all the people saying stupid and illogical and literal "crazy" stuff like "humans and dinosaurs coexisted". I think everything will be alright.

[@Mansplainer452]

I thought you tend to trap your superior farts in a bottle and get high off of sniffing it. The level of cringe that you atheist, cuck virgins exhibit has become nauseating

[@michaelszczys8316]

Modern Christians are like , " I believe the Bible and six days of creation around 6 thousand years ago " " but what about the dinosaurs ?" " they all died out 65 million years ago "

[@michaelszczys8316]

One of the subtle things I see pushed more and more is that there was a huge gap in Genesis creation where there were millions of years injected into the time of creation. And of course the Bible is ' wrong '.

[@stevepierce6467]

@@michaelszczys8316 The bible is neither right or wrong, but rather a logically predictable way for priests to try to explain the world to pre-scientific peasants.

[@beliefbite]

I think the must subtle thing is how people think they interpret Genesis literally, yet they use science to altar their interpretation. How many people take the firmament literally?

[@JB-yb4wn]

@@beliefbite Think you created a new verb there. To "altar" is maybe when a priest goes up to the altar to lie about science to his congregation? You meant alter, but I think your word is much better.

[@stevepierce6467]

@@beliefbite Biblical fundamentalists only reject the tiny part of science that contradicts the bible story, while adopting willy-nilly all the other products of science they like. I always asked my right-wing students WSUVWJD? Which SUV would jesus drive? They stuttered in confusion. Their brainwashing does not allow for contradictory thought.

[@johnpickett8533]

My theory on dinosaurs , " They are thin on one end,get much ,much thicker in the middle, and thin again on the other end."

[@IllyaLeonovMorganFreepony]

Whoa. That is a great theory! And so obvious when you look at them. I am going to remember that when I look for dinosaurs.

[@justinlloyd2446]

I am going to tell Anne Elk that you stole her theory lol

[@gerry.shafer6101]

WHY. DO. WE. SPEND. A. FORTUNE. ON COFFINS. WHEN. THE. EARTH. WILL. BE. HERE. FOR. MILLIONS. MORE. YEARS. JUST. LIKE. BEFORE. !!!

[@AbadaleRavnic]

4:54 My dog can use it's hip structure to raise it's body of the ground, I can use my hip structure to raise my body of the ground...well hot diggity we must be dinosaurs!

[@daryleemanuel5325]

What animals did the fallen ones mix with? They not only went into the daughters of men but they also mixed with animals. Just like their children turned into giant monsters, I'm absolutely certain the animals they manipulated didn't stay the same.

[@saltyberryapothecary6119]

Kinda like st Christopher.... With his Dog head.... They certainly mixed

[@alantasman8273]

The Book of Enoch although not accepted as canon speaks to this.

[@warpnin3]

Jesus himself said that angels cannot procreate; He should know, because He made them and everything else.. Angels and humans are very different beings and cannot have offspring. Even on earth the different animal kinds cannot have offspring together.

[@alantasman8273]

@@warpnin3 Jude 1:6-9 KJV And the angels which kept not their first estate, but left their own habitation, he hath reserved in everlasting chains under darkness unto the judgment of the great day. Even as Sodom and Gomorrha, and the cities about them in like manner, giving themselves over to fornication, and going after strange flesh, are set forth for an example, suffering the ...something fleshly was happening.

[@daryleemanuel5325]

@@warpnin3 when Genesis used the phrase "went in unto them" it ment they fornicated. It's difficult to comprehend how authoritative people think themselves when in actuality, they are even more blind than a bat. 98 percent of people walk around with all the right answers to all the wrong questions and deem themselves knowledgeable. Just like people think God ordered Jacob to kill ordinary human beings when He told Isreal to kill every man woman and child and all the animals when in fact, those same people have no idea what The Sons of Anikem was. It took one comment to uproot everything you said, and I would wager that your certain of the validity of your reasoning.... and please don't think your unique in this haystack of misinformation because half, very conservatively, of the videos on KZbin devolve down simular rabbit holes of spiritual deception.

[@davidmantooth1285]

I've seen pictures of dinosaurs but never actually saw one. I doubt that there were cameras in those days.

[@alantasman8273]

Peruvian Ica Burial Stones depict dinosaurs interacting with man as do Mexican Acambaro Figurines. In Glen Rose Texas a riverbed bottom was exposed after a storm and was found to contain a strata that included dinosaur and human footprints walking parallel to each other. One of the human footprints actually walked thorough the dinosaur footprint leaving a combination human a dinosaur footprint. When scientists were challenged by this fact...they said obviously there was a previous unknown dinosaur which had human feet....LOL.

[@avi8r66]

You are correct, there were no cameras available 66,000,000 million years ago.

[@avi8r66]

@@alantasman8273 Nothing you said was correct. Just wanted you to know that. If you want to prove me wrong I will need citations to follow up on. A lot of bad art from prehistoric times has been claimed as depicting dinosaurs, but it's always not what they claim, always. As for the glen rose riverbed prints, I have never seen anything where a scientist, an honest one not a creationist 'scientist' say something like 'there was a previous unknown dinosaur which had human feet'. The prints that seem human are a variety of things, depends on which specific impression you point to, but for the most part they are modified and/or eroded dinosaur prints, modified by creationists back in the 1930s to hype the 'find' and bolster their claims of humans and dinos living together. This game of faking evidence is not new in the creationist arena. Not unique to them, but very prevalent.

[@JB-yb4wn]

@@avi8r66 The Flinstones say otherwise.

[@avi8r66]

@@JB-yb4wn That there is some rock solid evidences BamBam.

[@djayk9692]

42:50 Yes, dinosaur fossils completely embedded by feathers have indeed been commonly discovered. The classical ‘raptor’ has been found fully feathered within stone. Only Hollywood ignored that fact. Smaller dinosaurs are the only ones found with feathers.

[@WiseAsSerpentsHarmlessAsDoves]

Then how were dinosaurs with feathers non-avian if birds come from them? And why this recent claim of feathers found in fossils(about 15 years ago)of dinosaurs goes against the proven fact that t-rex for example was covered by scales and not feathers? And since no one can prove it's actually feathers in those fossils and not other structures resembling modern day birds feathers before birds even evolved them in the first place?

[@djayk9692]

@@WiseAsSerpentsHarmlessAsDoves When was the last time you looked a dinosaur species phylogenetic tree? Birds are a ‘type’ of dinosaur, or off-shoot of them; Avialae. Thus becoming ‘Avian’ in their own nature. They’re a smaller form of Theropods. Similar to the concept of a woolly mammoth versus modern elephant; with and without the expression of body hair. Many whale species indeed have body hair or follicles that they keep/lose with age. Morphology and body size can dictate how various genes are expressed. Larger dinosaurs had thicker hides, with the genetic expression of follicular feathers or downy feathers blocked but scales prioritized, while the opposite was seen with smaller dinosaurs.

[@hylaherping9180]

​@Originalongrace Feathered dinosaurs have been known since Darwin was alive, it is not a recent discovery. Feathers did not originally evolve for flight, they evolved for maintaining body temperature as theropods were endothermic like modern birds. We know this for certain because Dinosaurs like Oviraptor have been found fossilized while insulating a clutch of eggs. Oviraptor was definitely not a bird, but was a theropod. Not all theropods were feathered, as T-Rex was too large to need them for thermoregulation. Similar to how the largest mammals living today have very little hair. There is no argument that paleontologists have discovered feathers on some theropods. No one, not even you can honestly look at Anchiornis fossils and say that they aren't covered in feathers. It's so obvious what those are. Sinosauropteryx is a theropod with insulating fuzzy feathers, none evolved for flight or gliding. Birds specifically are theropod dinosaurs that modified their feathers for flight. The earliest birds flew, all species that are flightless now stem from flying ancestors. This becomes even more obvious when looking at Terror Birds, which are what happens when you try to make a large carnivorous theropod dinosaur out of a bird. Birds are dinosaurs. Everyone who studies paleontology knows this. There's way too much evidence to deny it. Besides feathers on theropods, birds have genes for teeth which look exactly like dinosaur teeth, they have identical leg bone shapes, they have a fusion of tail vertebrae called the pygostyle. Fusion of bones imply unfusion in an ancestor. Birds share most of their DNA with Crocodilians which are the only other archosaurs left. This makes sense because dinosaurs were archosaurs so birds would also be archosaurs. If you think birds aren't dinosaurs, you're either lying to yourself or just plain ignorant of paleontology, biology and genetics.

[@starskill7468]

​@@hylaherping9180i am not sure since my knowledge of dinosaurs is still growing and my meories are messed up, but wasn't it like birds had almost the exact genes that e.g a deinonychus had, they just aren't active?

[@hylaherping9180]

@starskill7468 I don't think there's any way we could know what genes Dinosaurs had because they are only know from fossils. No DNA preserved.

[@johnlinden7398]

If this bible / christian apologist had any credability whatsoever he would be debating this subject with a paleolithic expert instead of just SPUING out fast talking nonsense !

[@crusadercatwoman02]

Darwinist Evolutionist fairytales have no credibility whatsoever, and they already have Paleolithic bone experts and research data from the RATE group in 1999, which again prove the Creationist Truth.

[@AmmaMama-xi3nu]

He's mostly preaching to the choir, and you're not in it. "He who has ears to hear, let him hear."

[@TRFrench]

I had not even thought that this bird dinosaur thing is a grasp at transitionals that are not there. interesting

[@jockyoung4491]

Except that they obviously are there.

[@MikeysGirl2104]

As well as other transitionals

[@billjohnson9472]

Everyone talks about missing fossils but fail to identify precisely what they think is missing.

[@haggismcbaggis9485]

Yes, what would a half dinosaur/half bird look like? Caudipteryx perhaps?

[@yoeyyoey8937]

Wym? birds are dinos

[@statutesofthelord]

6:13 They didn't kick religion out of the schools, they replaced the Christian religion with Evolution. That is very true. "Evolution hasn't been observed while it's happening". - Richard Dawkins.

[@jockyoung4491]

We observe the evidence that evolution happens. Macro-evolution is obviously too slow to "watch". I think I understand what Dawkins was trying to say, but most scientists would consider that exact statement incorrect. We have watched evolution happen over many generations in both laboratory and wild settings.

[@samuelguzman5348]

If by "evolution" you mean "adaptation", I would be fine by that. God clearly created his creation with this ability, having imparted his wisdom into his creation. My problem with Darwinian evolution, is that to me, it requires great "faith" to believe it, since as you said, it is too "slow" for it to even be observed, from "amoeba to man".. But how do you know that evolution is "slow"? Why can't it be TODAY when that ape all of a sudden begins to walk upright? Since the "process" is ONGOING? After supposed BILLIONS of years, shouldn't we be WITNESSING "macro-evolution" this very day? It's almost as if the "process" has a mind of its own..

[@annebritraaen2237]

That's not the only lie. You need to revise everything you've been told. Remember what's written on Werner von Braun's headstone.

[@samuelguzman5348]

​@LordMathious I disagree friend. All of the so called "experiments" performed in CONTROLLED environments to me only prove "adaptation", as bacteria still remains to be bacteria, it doesn't all of a sudden becomes something else.

[@samuelguzman5348]

​@@sterlingfallsproductions3930I understand friend, but it sounds a lot like a "trial and error" process, one "error" and the organism is DEAD.. its "evolution" over, finished, kaput.. And I am thinking about it brother.. if Darwinian evolution were true, we SHOULD be witnessing Macro-evolution this very day, occurring in multiple organisms.

[@BrianJonesOneClearChoice]

I find this to be so real telling it like it is and it fits the biblical description . Thanks Answers In Genesis team! Keep up the good work!

[@hongotedesco8931]

Unfortunately it's not good work. It's a bunch of lies and misinformation that is being presented.

[@lucbos7516]

There is no god Grow up end stop believing in fairy tales

[@BrianJonesOneClearChoice]

@@hongotedesco8931 Ok so you Say lies are being told - What are they? If you are an unbeliever ok that is your choice , bust to say they are telling lies and just leave it at that is wrong.

[@BrianJonesOneClearChoice]

@@lucbos7516 Can you prove your statement? Tell me if there is no God where did DNA come from?

[@lucbos7516]

@@BrianJonesOneClearChoice First there was RNA and later DNA

[@nikopawlowic6557]

Yeah I liked dinosaurs growing up, and still kind of do.

[@sjl197]

Which is why these creationists make up nonsense about dinosaurs being on the ark.

[@Woopor]

@@sjl197they know that dinosaurs are a really interesting and diverse scientific topic that all ages love and decide to try as hard as possible to squeeze it into religion however they can

[@shellbackbeau7021]

Thanks for sharing!

[@rickbrooks1974]

Turok son of Stone comics were epic.

[@jasoncoetzeeadadjjzjdatune9617]

Man, these well produced scientifically hygienic features and presentations have the secular professors in tears. It would-be easier without this miracle to negotiate. The big bang is a stretch.

[@hongotedesco8931]

What's a stretch is "yeah, some guy walked on water, and then he turned into wine, and then he died, and then he resurrected, and then....". Now that my friend, is a stretch.

[@jasoncoetzeeadadjjzjdatune9617]

@@hongotedesco8931 it's more verifiable than string theory my friend , all happened, but irrelevant and foolish I admit, till you ask him, try it, supercharge your understanding, hes currently available and not what you imagine.

[@lewis18051]

@@jasoncoetzeeadadjjzjdatune9617😂😂😂😂

[@betsieswartz]

And it’s not a stretch to have a man ride from the dead

[@sjl197]

I’m a scientist, and this isn’t science.

[@silentD4d]

All of this makes more sense than not, HOWEVER, I have one inquiry. We know that humans and dinosaurs coexisted, but how is it that there aren’t any pelts or skins of said creatures? When slaying dragons or dinosaurs, surely the hunters would’ve taken its resources as either trophys or necessity. That’s really my only confusion on the matter, though, is just the lack of present evidence that isn’t fossilized. We need a part two!

[@lewis18051]

We don’t know they coexisted in fact we know they didn’t coexist! A few fake or altered cave paintings aren’t evidence

[@betsieswartz]

Literally none of this makes sense

[@rj-wz7do]

Which lasts longer over time? Reptile skin and scales or mamal hide like cows, deer, buffaloes, etc? How much more prevalent was the use of mamal hide for all the typical uses? Most likely whatever artifacts were actuality kept were lost, decayed, or destroyed.

[@betsieswartz]

@@rj-wz7do none of them were ever made because humans never hunted dinosaurs, or the other way around.

[@toothnail605]

Why are there "dinosaurs" and/or 'Dragons' on many many artifacts??

[@ClementGreen]

Bodie Hodge certainly grew up with dinosaurs.

[@kevinrtres]

Man, is he old!

[@ClementGreen]

@@kevinrtres I meant the Mormons: hasn't Bodie deconverted to Young Earth Creationism because they're more progressive?

[@kevinrtres]

@@ClementGreen Whatever blows your hair back, man. Enjoy the show! It'll be over soon.

[@ClementGreen]

@@kevinrtres To be honest, I can never watch more than a few minutes.

[@gregwilkin6565]

Thank you for sharing. :)

[@Eastsidechris]

Please explained the denisovans and gobekli tepi. These are giant statues and feats of engineering at least5000 to 8000 years before the events of the OT being given to Moses. We can’t explain everything away with nephilim can we?

[@cadence4527]

And my particular favorite - you have two different types of dinosaur hips. You have saurischian hips and ornithischian hips. Lizard hips and birds hips. According to scientists, Theropods evolved into birds, but the ones with the birds hips never did. That doesn’t make any sense. Another thing is theropods have gastralia. You know what else has gastralia? Crocodiles and members of the crocodilidae family.

[@tjsays8916]

For what will it profit a man if he gains the whole world, and loses his own soul? 37 Or what will a man give in exchange for his soul? Mark 8:36,37

[@rubiks6]

Well, that was a rather abrupt ending.

[@zap...]

Atheism is the rejection of a religious claim. Atheism is not a claim that there is no God.

[@tymanmodel1018]

Actually, they were already talking about dinosaurs evolving into birds 100-150 years ago with the discovery of the archaeopteryx. Also, Dr. Grant in Jurassic Park (1993) said this. It’s not a new thing.

[@wgterry73ify]

My church as a kid had a "movie" on God making dinosaur's (mid 80's)

[@DPM917]

I believe in the theory of gravity. The theory of gravity has the same level of empirical evidence as evolution through natural selection.That must make me a gravitationalist. Also, millions of Christians understand the earth is billions of years old, understand that populations of living things evolve, and understand that it’s ludicrous to think there is ANY evidence that the earth is 6,000 years old. If you believe young earth, it’s a matter of faith, which is fine. But don’t claim it’s based on the weight of evidence.

[@BionAvastar3000]

What evidence do you have that it's not 6000 years old?

[@billyb7465]

@@BionAvastar3000 Radiometric dating shows that Earth is about 4.5 billion years old.

[@BionAvastar3000]

@@billyb7465 Radiometric dating is flawed

[@billyb7465]

@@BionAvastar3000 Knew you would say that. Have you looked into the rebuttals to the people who say that it is flawed?

[@DPM917]

@@BionAvastar3000 The oldest rock found to date is a piece of zircon. Radiometric dating, including uranium lead dating, which rely on the same laws of physics and chemistry we’re relying on to communicate on this platform, show the level of nuclear decay that has occurred on that rock occurred over 4.3 Billion years. Tens of thousands of other rocks found all over the earth, measured by thousands of scientists in dozens of countries trying to test other scientist’s conclusions, and prove them wrong, have been measured using multiple types of radiometric dating and consistently found to be 3-4 Billion years old. We took back moon rocks and tested them- ages ranged with the oldest being 4.4-4.5 billion years old. Geologists observe and measure the geological column that exists everywhere on the planet. The rates at which sediment gets deposited and different types of rocks form from elements of which they are made can be measured, and all the evidence from thousands of independent experiments, from thousands of scientists trying to prove each other wrong, points to an earth that is at least 4 Billion years old. Tectonic plates: we can measure the rates at which these plates are moving away from each other and find geologic evidence for where on the planet they were connected- then we do the math, and bingo, we get billions of years. Then there’s Flourine dating, measuring the level of Florine saturating a particular object, Dendrochronology dating- tree rings, Fission Track dating, Polar magnetic dating, and Thermo luminescent dating, all of which overlap and can be crossed checked against the various radiometric dating methods and all of which point to an earth that is billions, not thousands, of years old. Light travels at 186,000 miles/second squared. Light hits our retinas from stars that are billions of light years away. It literally took billions of years for the light you see from some of the stars/galaxies to travel to earth. Admittedly, this last point shows an old universe, not necessarily an old earth. A 6,000 year old earth is impossible. When elements decay, they give off heat. If we measure all of the nuclear decay we see and observe and presume it has taken place over 6,000 years, the amount of the heat released in that short of a period of time would be enough to melt the earths crust several thousand times over. We would be barbecued. By contrast, the amount of heat released from nuclear decay over a period of 4 billion years, gives us the planet we observe.

[@DerKnusperhase]

has anybody notices how lecraes music changed drasticly? 4years ago i listend to ALL of this songs and there are many, nowadays i cant listen to any single new song / album he drops. it hurts my ears. from realtalk to ganja smoke christianity 0.o

[@ryancoorey158]

Why the abrupt ending? Where's the rest of the video?

[@monicaswavel6074]

We are pastors and we used your curriculum to teach our kids and our Church kids. One time 3 youth got mad at me for talking to them about creation and never came back but we are still friends with them now that they are grown. Thank you for everything you've doing for this generation.

[@jockyoung4491]

You are welcome to "teach" anything you want to, as long as you do not claim science supports it when it doesn't.

[@tjsays8916]

​@@jockyoung4491you don't get to dictate to us what we teach and how. So buzz off. I seriously doubt we will be thinking of you when we do. 😅😅😅

[@thurmansmithjr3149]

It's sad that pastors would teach nonsense that makes void the word of God. God makes sense, a 6000 year old earth does not. Try understanding the first two verses in the bible and the rest will fall into place. It's vitally important to understand the Hebrew figures of speech. The earth is not a flat plane with a dome lid to hold in the water either.

[@tjsays8916]

​@@ji8044I'd rather make minimum wage on my way to heaven than live in a mansion destined for hell

[@tjsays8916]

​@@ji8044Mark 8:36- 37 For what will it profit a man if he gains the whole world, and loses his own soul? 37 Or what will a man give in exchange for his soul?

[@kathleennorton7913]

Them calling birds dinosaurs shows the extent they have become delusional. If you didn't know better you would think that it was a joke. They've become a parody of themselves.

[@jockyoung4491]

If you don't understand the science, why are you even commenting? Birds evolved from dinosaurs. By the rules of biological classification, that means birds are technically dinosaurs. In general conversation, however, most people would say they are different.

[@el-duderino975]

​@@jockyoung4491can you elaborate?

[@jockyoung4491]

@@el-duderino975 Which part? The rules of taxonomy are not very important for non-scientists to understand, but the evidence of biological evolution really is.

[@haggismcbaggis9485]

Brodie does not mention that archaeopteryx had teeth and a long bony tail.

[@alantasman8273]

@@jockyoung4491 Birds and dinosaurs lived contemporaneously...at the same time. This is not even disputed. Get up to speed.

[@GodisallIneedPlantsareallIeat]

I'm a Christian, but a question popped into my head about dinosaurs. If the Ark was able to hold baby dinosaurs why don't we see those dinosaurs alive today?

[@user-lj5oc8fk9s]

Uhm. The ark had a shrink ray otherwise only some spieces of Dino would fit

[@Mothobius]

Because they were dead long before humans

[@PeaceMakerChad]

Read the book of enoch. When he was in heaven the angels took him to the end of the earth where he saw creatures he never saw before, flying creatures of diffirent colors and sounds. The truth is our world map is not actually how our earth is. We are not allowed to go to the ends of the earth because they make us believe it doesnt exist. Like we've already been everywhere but we havent

[@Mothobius]

@@PeaceMakerChad you obviously don't mean ends as in the earth being flat though right. Obviously not .

[@PeaceMakerChad]

@@Mothobius its literally in the bible and the entire book of enoch. Yes the earth is flat with pillars underneath. The reason it appears as a dome is because of the firmament. This is not my opinion. Its the truth bro. Enoch was given a tour of heaven and the earth and wrote what he saw so im going to trust him over theories in a science book. Educate yourself. Read the book of enoch its absolutely amazing

[@koonta6079]

Evolutionists haven't fooled anyone. We have a tailbone- We evolved.

[@Malco47]

I am a Christian. I believe in God, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. I have watched many of these videos espousing the young earth philosophy. And I ask, "why". Why do Christians use their time and energy trying to convince Christians and non-Christians that the Earth is 6000 years old? It is such folly! You don't know how God created the Earth and the Heavens. There are MANY interpretations of Genesis. Experts in theology differ in their interpretations of the true meanings of Genesis. Arrogant men, burdened by their egos, insist that their opinions and interpretations are "true". I do not believe that the Earth and the Universe are only 6000 years old. That does not make me any less a Christian or any less a Believer than those who insist otherwise. God was and is capable of creating all that exists in any way He chose. Stop arguing over the details of how he chose to do so! God is Love. Self-righteous ego is not.

[@thurmansmithjr3149]

The young earth theory would be comical but for the tragedy of convincing the world that Christians are lunatics. Why would they believe anything else you might say, including the gospel?

[@EAMorgan71]

So because people drew something it must have existed? So sphinx, chimera, werewolf, griffin, leprechauns, centaur, fairies, Pegasus, & etc etc are all real? Dumb logic🤦🏼‍♂️

[@hylaherping9180]

Technically Chimaeras are real, they're a ancient group of Shark-like fish known as Ratfishes. I know that's not what you were going for but I thought I'd bring it up anyway.

[@mezzoca8110]

Like Shiva in Hindu religion or Ra or Anubis in Egyptian. Have Jesus and Mohammad have something in common with the gods above?

[@Mothobius]

@@hylaherping9180 Chimeras not chimaeras. A chimera is a mammalian mythical animal with multiple animal heads and stuff

[@johnnyllooddte3415]

when we were in public school we were taught noahs fllood and Biblical geological time.. back then all scientists agreed with a worldwide flood 5 to 10,000 years ago.. within a few years the millions of years philosophy took over.. its very sad

[@adammarcusxi]

What year were you born?

[@davidfitnesstech]

One thing that's special about the people at "Answers in Genesis" ; they will never accept any *demonstrable evidence or research results* of any kind that *conflict* with their chosen *'belief system' ;-)* And that's always what you want out of your so-called "research" department.

[@nelyal181]

Checking this out right now, I think dinosaurs/science/the lack of mention of them in the Bible is a stumbling block for kids - especially older ones that are interested in science. It’s hard/impossible for them to believe both. Instead of just telling them to “take it by faith,” I hope to show them that they’re not contradictory!

[@globalcoupledances]

Birds are mentioned

[@nathanwhite704]

@@globalcoupledances Dinosaurs aren’t. We did not live with them. We were essentially archaic squirrels in their day 200-65 million years ago.

[@nathanwhite704]

The Bible does contradict science Evolution is a fact. The earth is billions of years old.

[@jesussaves4280]

Excellent! Thank you! Maranatha 🙌🏼🙏🥰

[@amark350]

@@danielhamid5569the higher up the food chain of knowledge you go, the more you realize you don’t know. You’d be surprised how smart and how much research people have put into the life and death of Christ. For every point you raise, I guarantee you there is a well thought out rebuttal. The fact you don’t know this, shows you haven’t had any real depth of research

[@hernandez-yanezboldvoyager2623]

May God bless you and empower you even more 🙏

[@ashwayn]

GOD WHO dont you know ITS names?

[@user-pf3zw5sl8o]

Psalm 118:8. It is better to take refuge in the Lord than to trust in man.

[@johnqdoe8841]

I feel that if someone got it pushed to the supreme court level that "environmentalism" would be listed as a religion as well!

[@0animalproductworld558]

We think dinosaurs like that but if we really think about it, if we look at the bones of the giraffes without ever seeing a live one. We might think it is a dinosaur and looks like dinosaurs in the movies with smooth skin, fiercesome look, and fast like the movies. Since we know how giraffes look like, they don't look like dinosaurs in the movies. Dinosaurs do not look like how they portray them to look like. Also, how dinosaurs are so fast in movies are wrong. At that weigh and size, a dinosaur is way slower...

[@hylaherping9180]

The Jurassic Park franchise is known for having very inaccurate dinosaurs, but most dinosaurs were in fact fast as they had hollow light weight bones and endothermy like birds and mammals do. While skin impressions aren't always fossilized to give a clear picture of what the flesh and skin of the animal would look like, we do have others ways to tell. Anchiornis fossils have feather impressions so we can tell it was a feathered dinosaur.

[@Woopor]

Dinosaurs were as varied as mammals are today. Some were incredibly nimble and light, some extremely fast runners, some heavy and cattle-like, some giant yet quick hunters

[@crowrage8929]

No scientist is going to mistake a giraffe skeleton for a dinosaurs, even if it was fossilized.

[@gerardojuarez7940]

Billion years ago????…. Nonsense

[@jockyoung4491]

It is an established scientific fact that the Earth is over 4.5 billion years.

[@newcreationinchrist1423]

​@@jockyoung4491it's really not fact at all. It's the evolutionary presupposition based on your worldview.

[@jockyoung4491]

@@newcreationinchrist1423 It has nothing to do with "worldview". It is base solely on scientific observations using physical laws. And biological evolution has nothing to do with it.

[@tjsays8916]

​@@jockyoung4491😅😅😅😅 established fact eh?

[@g.o.b.2558]

​@@ji8044🤣 Jesus still loves you...

[@cathy7382]

As a child I was fascinated by dinosaurs, I remember checking out all the books for kids from the library about the subject I was disturbed that they died out Now fast forward with better understanding especially after seeing Jurassic Park I would be terrified seeing one now Praise God for His great power!

[@dodgecrockett3474]

Cathy, I'm not sure I understand what you're trying to say. Are you saying that children's books on dinosaurs are unscientific and Jurassic Park is scientific?

[@hongotedesco8931]

Yes, be glad you don't have to roam around with T-rex. But the dinosaur existence and extinction had nothing to do with god. It had to do with the violent universe we live in. The same thing could happen to us at any point in the future.

[@sm360zfx]

What's your favourite dinosaur mine's the Triceratops

[@matfoster4856]

If you trusted your God, they would be as nothing. I'm not a person of faith, but don't understand how you claim to believe, yet, lack so much.

[@matfoster4856]

​@@sm360zfxmegatriceralodon

[@22190971]

Strangely enough the founding fathers separated church from state. Which make sense when you think what Christianity would legislate against or for.

[@lloydwright3661]

16:00 did my guy really just say T-Rex was a vegetarian 🤣🤣🤣

[@jonaswerner8480]

I wont lie, I bursted out laughing Specially considering we found t-rex remains with theyr last meals still contained in theyr belly Dont even get me started on Yutyrannus

[@michlogan8856]

tell me u do not understand english without telling me

[@nikkistump3480]

Great video!

[@rambodave]

This is what makes Christianity so hard to believe.

[@beliefbite]

Which part? Just remember this is only one small segment of Christianity

[@rambodave]

@@beliefbite this guy has zero evidence for anything. He just tries to poke holes in solid logic and science. He is about as convincing as flat earthers or people who think aliens built the pyramids or Atlantis.

[@Mothobius]

Trust me we aren't all like this.

[@triciamoon6312]

​@Mothobius I'm genuinely curious why you chose to disparage your brother in Christ and take Satan's bait here. What part of his talk did you think was so far-fetched? Everything he said he gave examples for?

[@rambodave]

@triciamoon6312 Satan's bait oh man you are too far gone. Look it's been a while since I watched this garbage but I skimmed it again. This guy has zero idea of anything about science, the physical world, or anything. I think answers in genesis and people like this are an insult to creation. They choose to cherry pick misrepresent and destroy any advance of human intellectual progress because God. That's a legitimate insult to the true creator of this reality, universe, time, space, and dimensions. The creator God if you want to call it that created all we see and called upon us to understand it. That's called science. These hacks are an insult to God and I will never respect that. Amd no Christian should they are doing themselves a disservice.

[@yuliaschannel6288]

These pictures don’t prove anything. This people just were finding huge bones of Dinos and imagining creatures based on bones - the same like us.

[@markross2124]

How's about the sightings of lake monstera such as Ogo Pogo, Lake Champlain, and of course loch ness in Scotland. Also, sightings in the Congo and Camaron of a Diplodocus and maybe even many other types of Dinasaur like creatures.

[@Jewonastick]

How about the fact that those sightings NEVER have been confirmed?!

[@bigcorky4687]

I'm scottish and everyone here knows the Loch Ness monster was a hoax to promote early tourism, some people will believe anything that they are told

[@billjohnson9472]

Funny, now that everyone carries cameras in their pockets these sightings have disappeared. Coincidence?

[@stevepierce6467]

How's about that? Not a single solitary actual real sighting!

[@Psalms-From-Shiloh]

How about mokele mbembe in the congo? Kent Hovind did a video all about dinosaur sightings which included this one.

[@tl4633]

Good stuff.

[@TheWickkit]

I don't understand why, when I accepted Christ at 2 years old, I was 28 years old when I first heard about Ivan Panin and I was 41 years old when I finally found, purchased and am reading his 3 part book, his life's work, that PROVES the Bible was orchestrated by a higher power, God. He was a Russian mathematician and such a devout agnostic that when he discovered the anomalies of numerous mathematical equations in the biblical texts, the original writings (when he was studying them, I believe in Germany) his conversion to Christianity was covered by the news media. I'd heard a miniscule amount about Bible Chronology, which is Part 2 of Ivan's book. It's important to establish a consistency about the numbers used in the Bible when you're going to use those numbers to show mathematical anomalies in the texts. Part 1 is his explanation of the references and process used to establish the numerical absolutes and he lays it out in cannons just as laws are to hold up to the utmost scrutiny. He was unchallenged in his lifetime for anyone to point out flaws in his claims or his reasoning and the people whom I have since read claiming to disprove Ivan's discoveries, have the most pathetic arguments with absolutely zero credibility and they don't even make sense. Why is this not widely known among Christian communities? It is the indisputable end all to every God centered "debate I've ever had. It's HUGE and we've let it get swept under the rug.

[@hongotedesco8931]

Um, the whole Panin numerology stuff is nonsense. Debunked.

[@TheWickkit]

@@hongotedesco8931 Oh geez, I guess I should feel pretty sheepish then, for believing the factual data presented by a mathematician who was also a professor at Harvard University over the confirmation bias saturated, genius blow hards on reddit and quora! Buuuuuuut, I don't. It's not numerology and it's not "a thing" to be "debunked". It's math, you don't "debunk" math. And no, there's no actual evidence of anyone disproving his claims with anything more than opinionated wishful thinking and gas lighting. I'm willing to wager that the vast majority of people speaking about the subject with the stance that Panin is wrong or using incorrect data, haven't even read the 3 Parts of his documentation in their entirety. Sorry...not sorry but you're incorrect/misinformed.

[@user-oh2ps3ft8s]

I came to the lord via a true believer in evolution and the big bang. Yesterday to my surprise I fell to my knees in the street and apologized to Him for my blasphemy. I don't know if I can ever atone for my accumulated sin but I accept any punishment coming my way.

[@Yurwastingyourtime]

I love how you guys stick up for the word of god and let it interpret itself

[@user-jq6cm2ct7e]

Well the word Behemoth is in the Bible and is proof that they did exist with God's creation, were people here back then, cave drawings show some types of dinosaurs again. Katt Kerr talks about how God ended the dinosaurs also at a specific time with an ice age hitting Earth which many people have found dinosaurs with food in their stomache's and frozen still today. How would that be done by God, by only a Prayer! He is the creator and has done a lot of things in the Bible with His People.

[@lucbos7516]

There is no god Grow up end stop believing in fairy tales

[@sirilay]

@gamingguru2602 Right. The book that's a copy of a copy of a translation of a translation, whose "most important"parts are anonymous and passed down orally for at least 30 years and strongly point to being copied off each other, is speaking for itself. How much have you fact checked, again?

[@GatorBoyCL]

@@lucbos7516Give it a chance,You may be interested,God loves you

[@WiseAsSerpentsHarmlessAsDoves]

​@@lucbos7516God exists as science and history demonstrate even if you don't want to have faith that's just the truth

[@tommytommy7096]

Absolutely amazing love this stuff….

[@hansguymon1254]

Can anyone tell me where on the San Rafael swell the rock art of the dinosaur is at?

[@chasebush7423]

So if I draw a dragon on a wall, that’s proof that dragons are real

[@canadachandler7521]

This is like listening to a 4 year old explain quantum mathematics.

[@michaelmuzondo1556]

Explain the megalith structures around the world and the sumerian creation stories

[@lmatthews39]

I'd watch that

[@ams3004]

Dragons are powerful creatures in Chinese mythology. They’re associated with the ability to control the seasons, time, and harvests. Why would you wear them???

[@flournoymason8961]

How silly. Humans and dinosaurs missed each other by millions of years. A secular world view is needed to learn true science. A religious view tends to be ridiculous.

[@robertlott8766]

This was one of the points that drove me away from the church. I can't believe I fell for that.

[@onestoptechnologies7305]

I know... it wasn't until college that I realized how modern "science" had been lying to me for years and presenting their pseudo-scientific, God-hating religion as FACT... when it was really just lies supported by more lies! Seeing "millions of years of geologic layering" cut through from top to bottom by numerous petrified trees... really helped me see through their BS!

[@Nutritionwithmaya]

🤷‍♀️ what made you walk away?

[@danieldamico9775]

Smart man

[@robertlott8766]

@naturalsolutionswithmaya8317 Homestly, I never felt the way other people described having a relationship with God. I did everything I was told and more but never felt any supernatural presence. Then, I started listening to scientists, and it convinced me that Christianity was false. Idk if it is or not, but I'm seeing now that a lit of "science" is just another cult.

[@SandwichKing-lj4ej]

Go by your KJV bible, not what the church or experts tell you. See Jeremiah 4: 23-26, 2 Peter 3: 5-7, Isiah 45: 18, Isiah 14: 12-17, and Job 38. There was a prior creation destroyed universally and the rebuilt starting Genesis 1:2. Everything makes a lot more sense in the Bible and archeology when you understand this. Notice Satan so jealous of Mankind placed in charge of the earth after the days of creation. Mankind only around 6000 years or so but the earth is ancient.