Evolutionists Have Fooled MILLIONS About This

[@TheTrueMariWho]

People used to believe that the krakens & leviathans were true, then they believed it was a myth, yet Giant Squids & Whales exist.

[@hylaherping9180]

Because it is physically impossible for a squid to lift its tentacles out of water onto a boat to drag it down.

[@TheTrueMariWho]

@@mountkeen8701 stories throughout histories have been embellished, however, “monsters” have always existed, to people who had no previous knowledge or education of said creatures. If you were a new young sailor who didn’t know science, and suddenly a giant salt water crocodile came after you, would you not think it was a monster?

[@TheTrueMariWho]

@@mountkeen8701 biblical events may have happened, but perhaps embellished or misinterpreted over thousands of years. Remember that old “telephone” game.

[@TheTrueMariWho]

@@mountkeen8701 it means that uneducated people have always tried to make explanations of things that they could not understand. You are trying to argue from a point that you believe I am religious, which is not true. I am agnostic.

[@TheTrueMariWho]

@@mountkeen8701 my original claims is that some anomalies that exist, and events that happened have been described throughout history by people whom may have been perceiving from a point of view that was uneducated in science. Also misinterpretation is always a huge factor. Science has proved that “monsters” exist, they aren’t “monsters”, once we have labeled them with a scientific name. A shark is not a “monster” to the educated, however, to the uneducated, it really kind of is a “monster”. Evidence exists that great floods did occur, this is a scientific fact, this does not mean it was an act of Poseidon. The parting of the Red Sea could have just been a shift in the tides.

[@tadcotadco6344]

In the mountains of Armenia my brother in law with a German geologist have found and took a photo of a petroglyph where a fight of 2 men against a typic tyrannosaurus is depicted. More precisely, one of the people lies on the ground wounded or dead, and the second protects him with a spear or stick from the lizard. The lizard, in fact, is not a Tyrannosaurus rex, but a smaller variety of it, which, judging from fossil records, was widespread in the Armenian highland

[@jarsa4099]

Hay manera de ver esa foto? Ya sea por tu cuenta personal o alguna pagina oficial? Esteria encantado de verla para compartirla con mis amigos

[@tadcotadco6344]

@@jarsa4099 unfortunately no. The photo belongs to the German geologist, and although I have it. I have no right to distribute it. But a typical tyrannosaurus type dino is depicted with a thick, long, but not tapering snout, standing on powerful hind limbs, with small upper limbs and a massive tail. Actually I never seen such convincing image of a dino. And its antiquity is beyond doubt. There are many other petroglyphs on that 3000m+ mount

[@sox8278]

Soooo one of those inhave proof but you cant see it situations..

[@tadcotadco6344]

@@sox8278 why cannot see? Fly here and I'll show you the photo. Alternatively, go to that mount full of petroglyphs and you will see the original

[@sox8278]

Sure you book the tickets and accommodation and then il be more then prepared to not only eat my words but proclaim your evidence.

[@IAMhassentyou-h5w]

Psalm 40:4. Blessed is the man who makes the Lord his trust, who does not turn to the proud, to those who go astray after a lie!

[@notbad4-45]

Those that go astray after a lie?

[@notbad4-45]

Blessed are those that repent and ask for forgiveness after making mistake.

[@user-vn8so9rf3d]

So do I trust the written word of God (with myriad interpretations), or God's word written so clearly in Geology and Astronomy...

[@spikenomoon]

Dinosaurs hatch. Eggs could have been on the ark

[@user-vn8so9rf3d]

@@spikenomoon Which Bible verse mentions this?

[@rayfridley6649]

@28:38-The behemoth in Job 40:15 was translated to English before the term dinosaur appeared; Dinosaur did not come into the English language until 1841.

[@chrisrhodes2081]

The same time they started discovering all the Dinos 😂

[@hotties4jesus]

Humans and modern animals could not compete with dinosaurs. Lions, Tigers, bears..they would have been scooby snacks for apex dinosaur predators. LOL

[@ADRI_a_REAL1]

@@chrisrhodes2081'they' were discovering dinosaurs for centuries prior. they just werent known to be dinosaurs. a famous example is ancient chinese 'dragon bones'

[@raymondrudolph503]

In 1979 my 6th grade teacher told us that she has more of an influence on us than our own parents do.

[@salvagemonster3612]

No she didn’t say that

[@antoniovela4125]

I taught for 30 years n never ever said that

[@raymondrudolph503]

@@antoniovela4125 I don't recall having you as a teacher

[@antoniovela4125]

Never said I was…just a response 🤦🏻‍♂️

[@raymondrudolph503]

@antoniovela4125 that cool I saw that most bullies in school were teachers

[@jadabrown1811]

I’m a mechanical engineer but one day I want to work with answers in genesis. They are a blessing over my life and calling. Praying for this ministry🤍

[@riskasaka3559]

I bvvi vrgfxfy

[@avi8r66]

They only hire liars, so if you are good with lying you might have a shot. They don't care about your specific credentials, just that you will pitch their nonsense with an air of authority given your credentials.

[@adelinomorte7421]

jadabrown ***oh !!! yes you are a "mechanical engineer" , most likely you will never drive an electric automobile.***

[@KiKi-tf8rv]

@@adelinomorte7421You do realize mechanical engineers actually make those electric vehicles, right?

[@montychiton]

I would say stay in technical engineering, something Bodie Hodge should have done as well...

[@IAMhassentyou-h5w]

"The Lord is my rock, my fortress and my deliverer; my God is my rock, in whom I take refuge, my shield and the horn of my salvation, my stronghold." (Psalm 18:2)

[@--..-...-..-.--....]

My favorite quote from god is:

[@paulschuckman6604]

​@@--..-...-..-.--....I AM.... that's my favorite quote, best part is anybody who says the same is just as questionable being real as people who question if God is real.

[@cliftongaither6642]

so you're bullet proof? 😂😂

[@chrisanderson5317]

Blank places on old maps used to read, "Beyond this point thar be dragons."

[@sojourner1511]

Satan's favorite line, "Did God really say?"

[@yoeyyoey8937]

Wym?

[@IAMhassentyou-h5w]

Psalm 118:8. It is better to take refuge in the Lord than to trust in man.

[@jesusgavemeaids]

What about What Harry Potter said??? I know for a fact that Harry Potter is real because I have all the books.😂

[@andecap1325]

@@IAMhassentyou-h5w . `

[@andecap1325]

@@IAMhassentyou-h5w it is better to trust math than the wandering mind...

[@lisabobo6657]

When you’re frustrated, just imagine T-Rex making your bed😮😂

[@RobertPatillo-r8q]

I like the comic of a young t-Rex in school. Who’s mad he never gets called to answer a question, because his arms are to short for the teacher to see.

[@dustencross357]

Imagine T-Rex brushing his teeth...

[@sunkissed1974]

I laughed way harder at this than I should have. 😂

[@timothyelposar2571]

​@@dustencross357 Imagine a t-rex doing push ups

[@dustencross357]

@@timothyelposar2571 imagine two T-Rex trying to do a high five

[@valerieprice1745]

The answers are in Genesis. Just so you know, there are rough collies and smooth collies. Smooth collies have short hair. They don't usually cross breed them,because the puppies can come rough or Smooth, but they will sometimes have an intermediate coat, medium length. Rough collies have lost the short hair information. Smooth collies have lost the long hair information. What this presentation is teaching is valuable information. It's true.

[@jockyoung4491]

Yes, changes in dog breeds are a good example of evolution.

[@valerieprice1745]

@@jockyoung4491 not so. Dog breeds are an example of natural and artificial selection, NOT evolution. Evolution posits that somewhere back in Lyell's famously extremist "deep time ", a strange form of ancestor produced celery seeds and also produced puppies. No matter how many billions of years you want, there is still ZERO chance of inert matter "coming alive ", like in the cartoons you were watching while you should have been reading your Bible, and there is ZERO chance of celery having puppies.

[@burnforeverandever]

Genesis says the earth is a flat disc with a dome over it covered in an expanse of water. It was clearly written people who didn't know anything about the world

[@jameslyons532]

And given enough time, if bred separately, they will lose the ability to interbreed and be two different species. Wow, evolution makes sense when you stop reading the Bible.

[@ramonortiz7462]

Let me get this straight.. You ACKNOWLEDGE that the big bang is incorrect and that evolution is blatant lies yet for "reasons" you do believe that a big bang created a giant spinning spherical water world space ball spinning faster than a BULLET at the EQUATOR when the Bible states the earth is firm and IMMOVABLE!!

[@ianhutson8641]

Dr. Ian Malcolm, “God creates dinosaurs, god destroys dinosaurs, God creates man, man destroys god, man creates dinosaur”... after a pause Dr. Ellie Sattler states “dinosaurs eat man, woman inherits the earth.”

[@Nola-2000]

There are Leviathan and big snakes with feet. The fall is all about the snake loosing his feet

[@IAMhassentyou-h5w]

Trust in the LORD with all your heart and lean not on your own understanding; in all your ways submit to Him, and He will make your paths straight. (Proverbs 3:5-6)

[@tbong9293]

Amen

[@betsieswartz]

Nah

[@RC6790]

Trust in God and you, too can wear a belt buckle that says "God with us" as you join in a slaughter that killed 50 million people known as WWII and the best part is you never questioned anything until it was too late! So go on down that road that preaches that the bible is perfect and makes no mistakes even as it teaches the science (knowledge) that was all that was known over 4,000 years ago and with no changes allowed since then!

[@silkwoodart]

He not only makes paths straight, but Jesus also mows my lawn every Saturday.

[@cliftongaither6642]

yeah right!

[@tymz-r-achangin]

We Christians know we are to believe in God through faith. Its the atheists/evolutionists who teach their theories as facts for happening the way they claim, and then they most often expose their disgruntled adolescent attitude when we wont believe their theories. However these evolutionists refuse to tell us how matter has the ability to bring themselves in to existence, and how the properties of physics brought themselves into existence.

[@globalcoupledances]

By Mass-energy equivalence

[@junglelawman728]

Exactly, they don't admit to have a belief based on faith.

[@hylaherping9180]

It's very easy to get disgruntled when trying to explain the evidence for something when the person you're explaining it to has already made up their mind that they will only believe things by faith...

[@daniellarkins3849]

Except traditionally speaking theories are facts. The bible on the hand demands you believe in it and not question it or be punished.

[@junglelawman728]

@@daniellarkins3849 Lol, believing a magical bacteria appear from nowhere, inject time, bacteria builds computers and lands on the moon?? Sounds legit............!?

[@APilgrimInAFallenWorld2030]

The great falling away! The world is falling away from Truth which causes them to deny reality and become deluded by their wicked imaginations. They are now starting to do all that their wicked imagination comes up with.

[@JB-yb4wn]

@@Legend-mg2ry Why yes it is!

[@betsieswartz]

If anything, god is way more far fetched than dinosaurs. We have found thousands of fossils detailing hundreds of species. The Bible does not substitute them.

[@funshine817]

Well said

[@crowrage8929]

Just like wicked book learning, and evil maths , and profound thought that doesn't include Bible studies. Using what God gave us is a sin.

[@sixfootoneistall2002]

It is my hope that the world falls away from religion and embraces a secular way of living and viewing the world

[@WiseAsSerpentsHarmlessAsDoves]

Evolutionists fooled me my whole life, and that began with the love for dinosaurs as a kid

[@sjl197]

Hi, I’m a biologist. What aspects do you say fooled you? When I watch creationist videos this I see terrible misrepresentation of the science, even deliberately wrong. Sadly this then misleads people with little science background.

[@EQOAnostalgia]

Yeah they do that. They brainwash you with everything from a young age.

[@robertmyers6865]

I love dinos too, but it has NEVER changed my view of the Bible, and I love science also!!!

[@BrianJonesOneClearChoice]

@@sjl197 I find it so interesting that evolutionist use the word science to make it seem like there assumption is fact in reality science is a testing of assumptions to see if they are factual .. You can not do that so therefore it's not science! It's a theory! Yet Biblical information has been proven to be fact historically. One being the life and death and reresection of Jesus Historically proven.

[@sjl197]

@@BrianJonesOneClearChoice Hi. Well, evolutionary biology is a subset of biology, which is a subset of science. This is as much of a fact, and moreso that much of what you then claim to be factual. That said, let's perhaps shift first to where we can perhaps agree. I also think the bible contains much which can be seen as historical facts, especially in the new testament. Here, i mean many reported aspects that tie against (and hence supported by) other external evidence which independently is inline with same narrative like archeology, or less securely by other stated accounts, most notably those written by other authors. However, i would take pause to say that much said about the life of Jesus really does not seem to me as secure as you seem to favour. I would strongly disagree about your statement on the resurection as 'historically proven' - it absolutely is not proven. Firstly, the claim of resurrection after death is of course counter to (almost) any such event in humanity history - or even that of any animal. The idea of Jesus' resurrection is an extraordinary claim, which of course makes it so remarkable to Christians. However, it is not the only claimed case, as similar extrordinary claims exist for supposed resurrection for Osiris in Egypt, Tammuz in Mesopotamia, Quetzalcóatl in Mexico, etc. If stick to bible though, I find it amazing how easily forgotton Lazarus of Bethany became, even though he too was said to be resurrected. Anyway, to focus back on the beloved Jesus, what there is are essentially four different accounts, seemingly written many years later by people who were not directly involved in the events. Add in some scholars favor that the account of Matthew seems to largely adapted from Mark possibly earlier account, hence lacks independance. There's also a rather indirect statement by Paul to the Corinthians, that you might want to treat as eye-witness. Even if the accounts are independendant, each vary in several aspects of the narrative, which a modern court case in the western world would rightly treat with skeptisim and caution if such differing accounts were presented as evidence. So, i'm really not sure how you can jump from what's said in those differing (and possibly non-independant) accounts, mostly written long after the event, to somehow 'historically proven'. i really cannot fathom how you seem willing to gladly accept those as 'true' or in your words ‘proven’, yet seem so willing to dismiss evolution (or rather evolutionary biology) as unfounded? It partly seems you've partly misunderstood the scientific word theory is, if so let’s first address that. A theory in scientific terminology has been explained multiple times as a "well-substantiated explanation", "based on a body of facts that have been repeatedly confirmed", a concept which differs strongly from the common usage of 'theory' as more akin to a premise or a hypothesis. How we define science is more tricky, but your idea of 'testing assumptions' can be part of core concept of falsifiability. That's only one facet of science, but if using that then i would strongly disagree with you there too - much of evolutionary biology including all the core concepts have been subject to 'testing' in many various ways, and the concepts remain robust to the continued addition of new evidence from multiple sources. Your beloved "historically proven" resurrection is in essence five cases of testimony, only one as eyewitness. Modern psychology has repeatedly shown how unreliable eye witnesses can be due to failure of memory, bias, and even willful embelishment. Yet worse, four of your five sources are several years after the alledged event, at best interpreting word of mouth hearsay. So please, let's hear how you say any of that is 'historically proven'.

[@georg7120]

Actually it's not a mistake, it is a blatant lie!

[@avi8r66]

@@ji8044 Brodie is paid to ignore data that doesn't fit the YEC narrative.

[@baileypanama]

@@ji8044 DNA code doesn’t change codes to cause anything to evolve

[@baileypanama]

@@ji8044 you don’t understand DNA. Your evolutionist teachers failed to tell you that no DNA in this planet can evolve to a new DNA code. Or has it ever been observed to change into a new DNA code to cause a fish to grow legs. The information is not there. In the human race all you will get is humans probably, lighter, darker, short, tall, slanted eyes, small eyes, but the DNA code will never evolve or add new information to cause a human to change into a monkey. The information is not there and it was never there. You’ve been lied to, that’s why you’re on this Christian creation channel because you don’t even believe your own theory of evolution so you’re looking for answers

[@baileypanama]

@Insultedyeti712 pointed out? But can you refute what I said? The answer is no. You will never be able to add information to any genome to cause any creature on this earth to grow a totally new limb 🦵. You, billions, trillions of years, scientist can never write the codes, y’all don’t have that power or intelligence and never will. Time cannot bring organism to life from the dead. Evolution is dead it’s been dead. People like you hold on to it because it’s your religion. To believe non life came to life from the dead.

[@kidwave1]

100% dinosaurs never existed, nothing but a lie. All dino bones are FAKE!

[@ITPalGame]

9:12 the "serpent" is more a title, a description. The deep roots of the name go back to "burning" or "hot like molten brass", which brings up images of the cherubim and seraphim seen by Ezekiel, Isaiah, and many others.

[@ashwayn]

serpent snake is a GODDESS symbol and in the second human creation myth in bible?? O yes Eden was second first was on 6th day and its pleural GODS inc a Goddess you should read the bible

[@ITPalGame]

@@ashwayn I'm perfectly capable of using various Biblical lexicons that explain the meanings of words. "serpent" in Genesis referring to the fallen one is a descriptive title, with roots in a "burning" as poison burns, or hot, glowing metal, as the appearance of the cherubim and seraphim seen that appeared to be glowing like hot brass.

[@joshuajoshua7257]

What is the root of nachash. Same?

[@ITPalGame]

@@joshuajoshua7257 Using Strong's, you can trace the roots for a better idea. There were also people who were named similar. Perhaps they were like "Cartwright" or "Smith", with roots in brass / copper forging 😁. I can copy / paste the entries later. They need cleaning up for the proper paste formatting.

[@ITPalGame]

@@joshuajoshua7257 From the top: "serpent" in Genesis 3.1 - h5175. נָחָשׁ nâḥâš; from 5172; a snake (from its hiss): - serpent. AV (31) - serpent 31; 1. serpent, snake A. serpent B. image (of serpent) C. fleeing serpent (mythological)

[@lisabobo6657]

Very good and lively teaching!! First time listener and he’s explaining things very well. I don’t like speakers that talk slowly, loses my interest. Learning some new truths is fun!

[@dodgecrockett3474]

Fred, I know what you mean. When speakers talk slowly, it gives the audience more time to reflect and think critically. If the presenter had allowed time for a Q&A session at the end, I wonder if that would have ruined his presentation.

[@lucbos7516]

There is no god Grow up end stop believing in fairy tales

[@lisabobo6657]

@@lucbos7516 the ‘fool’ hath said in his heart there is no God.

[@lisabobo6657]

@@lucbos7516 you will stand before Him as your prosecutor and judge.

[@rzella8022]

Yes, I prefer speakers who speak steadily and rapid pace. Otherwise my mind wanders and I will stop watching.

[@LindaSueGarland]

Thanks!

[@betsieswartz]

Two dollars wasted

[@Danplays3000]

That hurt toblook at

[@nikkistump3480]

Y’all must visit the Ark Encounter in Kentucky! It’s absolutely astounding!

[@richardgregory3684]

That's one word for it.

[@betsieswartz]

No

[@cliftongaither6642]

😂😂 why?

[@DiscipleofJesus9]

I believe things like this and many others are God calling the Church to sanctify itself and the world to turn to Jesus. We are headed for very troubling times.

[@crazypeopleonsunday7864]

After watching those last few minutes of the video: "Holy cow, there really *could* be a Jurassic Park!" Also, fun fact(s): there's a legend of a creature called the Kongomoto that lives in the Congo Rainforest in Africa which is described as being just like a pterosaur. In fact, one man who claimed to be attacked by a Kongomoto described it, was shown an illustration of a pterosaur, & claimed that it was the creature that attacked him. Additionally, a type of fish called the Coelacanth which lived at the same time as the dinosaurs (in the regards of believers in secularism) was believed to be long extinct with them... until it was discovered in the modern age by deep sea fishermen (that is, fishermen who fish for deep sea fish) off the east coast of Africa.

[@crazypeopleonsunday7864]

@@LordMathious Oh, I know there isn't, nor will there likely ever be. I was just joking around about that part. The stories and reports about the "kongomoto(s)" are true, though (in the sense that there *are* stories and reports about kongomotos, not necessarily that those stories and reports are true).

[@hylaherping9180]

Coelacanths are an order of fish, not a single species. The two species alive today are not anything like the many species found in the fossil record. The large gap between ancient and modern Coelacanths is due to how rare fossilization is, and the problem of where the fish lived. Since they only live in deep sea caves, we'd only be able to find them throughout the gap if deep sea cave systems eroded in every layer between the Mesozoic and modern periods. Even then, there'd still be no guarantee the fish would even have fossilized in spots we'd be able to dig in.

[@KarenKremer-smith]

And the movie “Journey to the Center of the Earth”. Watch it it will amaze you totally! ❤️🌈🙏🌎🎶

[@hylaherping9180]

@user-kr8pt4iu6g That and Ice Age 3 are not documentaries, they're fiction.

[@KarenKremer-smith]

Have you seen the movie “ The Journey to the Center of the Earth?” It will blow your attitude. You will be amazed at what you see. Amen. ❤️🙏🌈🌎🎶

[@slingslang2934]

Glad jesus has this youtube channel to fight & diminish the devils words.

[@Lupinotuum66]

LoL. You are so delusional

[@barchengerjeremiah]

Sort of sheds a different light on the idea of the Loch Ness monster being some type of plesiosaur, doesn't it.

[@billjohnson9472]

how about the Yeti, if the loch ness monster is a dinosaur then Yeti is a pre-human species, right?

[@haggismcbaggis9485]

That was until the people responsible for the Surgeon's photograph admitted they used a toy submarine and a fake head.

[@johnmoyers404]

Can we put poor Nessie out of his misery? It’s been proven the best photo was a hoax by a physician 👨‍⚕️ and 2 friends with a rubber glove and a child’s toy submarine! Plus the structure of the lock makes a critter his size IMPOSSIBLE to inhabit What about the NEPHILIM buried in my birth area southwestern OHIO Worshipped by native Americans? Does anyone who believes as I DO that Lucifer and 1/3 of the lesser Angels cast out in the failed attempt to destroy GOD were “good buddies” in the relative garbage heap Lucifer led them into? Ever consider they fought for destroying loyal humans - and tribes via caves still worship 15 feet PLUS tall entombed hominid creatures that I have been two in Adam’s county OHIO I am telling the truth Let the reader UNDERSTAND In Jesus’ NAME AMEN

[@timspiker]

@@haggismcbaggis9485 But... the story already existed before that. How did the people who made the story come up with the story? Humans can't make stories of things they don't know. So in order to come up with the idea of a dino in a lake, someone must've known what a dino was in a time where there supposedly were none.

[@haggismcbaggis9485]

@@timspiker The story originated in the 6th to 7th century from an embellished account of St. Columba saving 2 men from an aquatic monster, even raising one of them from the dead. The plesiosaur is likely a modern interpretation. Yes, ancient people had ideas about sea monsters.

[@nikopawlowic6557]

Yeah I liked dinosaurs growing up, and still kind of do.

[@sjl197]

Which is why these creationists make up nonsense about dinosaurs being on the ark.

[@Woopor]

@@sjl197they know that dinosaurs are a really interesting and diverse scientific topic that all ages love and decide to try as hard as possible to squeeze it into religion however they can

[@klouis1886]

If you add in the supernatural it is no longer science

[@JB-yb4wn]

You are wrong! It becomes "Christian" science. 🤣

[@DegeneratesLikeYou]

​@@JB-yb4wnit becomes real science

[@warpnin3]

What happens if I add that life made itself?

[@EAMorgan71]

So because people drew something it must have existed? So sphinx, chimera, werewolf, griffin, leprechauns, centaur, fairies, Pegasus, & etc etc are all real? Dumb logic🤦🏼‍♂️

[@hylaherping9180]

Technically Chimaeras are real, they're a ancient group of Shark-like fish known as Ratfishes. I know that's not what you were going for but I thought I'd bring it up anyway.

[@mezzoca8110]

Like Shiva in Hindu religion or Ra or Anubis in Egyptian. Have Jesus and Mohammad have something in common with the gods above?

[@Mothobius]

@@hylaherping9180 Chimeras not chimaeras. A chimera is a mammalian mythical animal with multiple animal heads and stuff

[@joshuaossman2739]

I believe his point is valid because he is using the bible as evidence of his point and the drawings of creatures like those depicted in the bible as further proof. If you take into account the literary style of all the other texts or stories that other "mythical" creatures come from, i think you will find they are obvious myths whereas the literary style of the bible is not mythological but instead makes a truth claim.

[@EAMorgan71]

@@joshuaossman2739 truth can be demonstrated. The Bible is just another claim. Why should anyone care or believe what the Bible says?

[@johnnemeth825]

Jesus open their eyes and heart to the Truth of God's Holy Word the Bible in Jesus name I pray 🙏 Amen 🙏

[@avi8r66]

If you are going to pray for anything please pray for these people to stop lying to you.

[@johnmulhern2833]

Good man....open with a joke 🤣🤣🤣

[@frosted1030]

"Jesus open their eyes" Your eyes have to be well shut to buy into a justice by proxy scam that clearly failed even in your own fables.

[@daniellarkins3849]

No one except fundamentalists Christians watch these videos. Most Americans who believe in god also believe in some form of evolution including myself.

[@avi8r66]

@@daniellarkins3849 Unfortunately these fundamentalists are politically loud and active, working to change the science curriculum of the educational system. If they can't get their garbage into the science text books they want the real science flagged as 'just one of many theories' to make it easier for them to recruit those kids into their fundamentalist ignorance later. Edit: They also tend to have a lot of overlap with hate preachers/groups, like Kent Hovind, Matt Powell, Grayson Fritts, and Steven Anderson.

[@Charlie94781]

The Havasupai petroglyph is an extremely flimsy piece of “evidence” that humans interacted with dinosaurs

[@ermagherd1204]

I’m 44 years old. In 2nd grade around 1986 my teacher would read every morning from the Bible. She would read a lot of those Old Testament classic stories like Moses & the Exodus, Samson with his long hair, King David, etc…looking back…I’m thankful. This from a non-believer.

[@lucbos7516]

There is no god Grow up end stop believing in fairy tales

[@ermagherd1204]

@@lucbos7516 guess you never noticed I said I was a non-believer you dimwitted amoeba. Also it’s “and”…not “end”….come on, man…

[@gohan3448]

@@lucbos7516 if God is not real why waste your time talking about him?

[@lucbos7516]

@@gohan3448 Grow up and stop believing in fairy tales The earth is 5 billion years old and the universe 13,7 billion years old

[@lucbos7516]

@@gohan3448 How do we know that this point in time is exactly 4.54 billion years in the past? The most important tool for dating things is the half-life of radioactive atoms. Every radioactive atom has a so-called half-life. That is the time, when there is exactly a 50% chance that it fell apart. Quantum mechanically, it is impossible to predict exactly when an atom will spontaneously fall apart. We can only say something about the probability of an atom falling apart. Fortunately for these measurements, there are a lot of atoms. The time when 50% of, say, a billion atoms have fallen apart, is precisely known, by the law of large numbers. There are atom types that have half-lives of hundreds of millions of years or more. Well-known examples are uranium-235, uranium-238 and thorium-232 (the number after the element name indicates the number of particles in the atomic nucleus). Radioactive decay occurs in only a few well-known ways. For example, an atom can emit an alpha particle, i.e. a helium nucleus: the atomic number then drops by two and there are two neutrons and two protons less in the remaining nucleus. Beta decay is also common: an atomic nucleus then ejects an electron and thereby moves up one place in the periodic table. A well-known series of decay reactions is that of uranium-238 in lead-206. Crystals of a pure uranium-containing mineral naturally contain no lead, because lead behaves chemically very differently from uranium. The more lead there is, the older the mineral must be. The amount of lead in uranium-containing meteorites relative to the amount of uranium is so high that they have been dated to be around 4.54 billion years old. Meteorites have formed in the protoplanetary disk. Therefore, we know that this disk existed around 4.54 billion years ago and so the Earth must be slightly younger than this date. The oldest known minerals on Earth, zirconium crystals from the Jack Hills of Australia, and where these measurements were taken, were not much younger, at around 4.4 billion years old. Hence we can say with great certainty that the earth is between 4.5 and 4.6 billion years old.

[@daryleman5325]

What animals did the fallen ones mix with? They not only went into the daughters of men but they also mixed with animals. Just like their children turned into giant monsters, I'm absolutely certain the animals they manipulated didn't stay the same.

[@saltyberryapothecary6119]

Kinda like st Christopher.... With his Dog head.... They certainly mixed

[@alantasman8273]

The Book of Enoch although not accepted as canon speaks to this.

[@warpnin3]

Jesus himself said that angels cannot procreate; He should know, because He made them and everything else.. Angels and humans are very different beings and cannot have offspring. Even on earth the different animal kinds cannot have offspring together.

[@alantasman8273]

@@warpnin3 Jude 1:6-9 KJV And the angels which kept not their first estate, but left their own habitation, he hath reserved in everlasting chains under darkness unto the judgment of the great day. Even as Sodom and Gomorrha, and the cities about them in like manner, giving themselves over to fornication, and going after strange flesh, are set forth for an example, suffering the ...something fleshly was happening.

[@daryleman5325]

@@warpnin3 when Genesis used the phrase "went in unto them" it ment they fornicated. It's difficult to comprehend how authoritative people think themselves when in actuality, they are even more blind than a bat. 98 percent of people walk around with all the right answers to all the wrong questions and deem themselves knowledgeable. Just like people think God ordered Jacob to kill ordinary human beings when He told Isreal to kill every man woman and child and all the animals when in fact, those same people have no idea what The Sons of Anikem was. It took one comment to uproot everything you said, and I would wager that your certain of the validity of your reasoning.... and please don't think your unique in this haystack of misinformation because half, very conservatively, of the videos on KZbin devolve down simular rabbit holes of spiritual deception.

[@kathleennorton7913]

Them calling birds dinosaurs shows the extent they have become delusional. If you didn't know better you would think that it was a joke. They've become a parody of themselves.

[@jockyoung4491]

If you don't understand the science, why are you even commenting? Birds evolved from dinosaurs. By the rules of biological classification, that means birds are technically dinosaurs. In general conversation, however, most people would say they are different.

[@el-duderino975]

​@@jockyoung4491can you elaborate?

[@jockyoung4491]

@@el-duderino975 Which part? The rules of taxonomy are not very important for non-scientists to understand, but the evidence of biological evolution really is.

[@haggismcbaggis9485]

Brodie does not mention that archaeopteryx had teeth and a long bony tail.

[@alantasman8273]

@@jockyoung4491 Birds and dinosaurs lived contemporaneously...at the same time. This is not even disputed. Get up to speed.

[@inknochen_]

12:10 why, if the Genesis is a Jewish book, the week has its form from Christians? Why also if God made the 7th day to rest, people are resting Sunday, which is the 1st?

[@johnpickett8533]

My theory on dinosaurs , " They are thin on one end,get much ,much thicker in the middle, and thin again on the other end."

[@IllyaLeonovMorganFreepony]

Whoa. That is a great theory! And so obvious when you look at them. I am going to remember that when I look for dinosaurs.

[@justinlloyd2446]

I am going to tell Anne Elk that you stole her theory lol

[@johnmoyers404]

I love ❤️ you fellow WARRIORS FOR CHRIST!

[@crusadercatwoman02]

Amen!

[@eudyptes5046]

If this bunch of uneducated losers is all he has ...

[@GatorBoyCL]

@@eudyptes5046what,you?

[@1516guapoful]

dinosaurs have been living with humans since our species exist. They're called birds.

[@hongotedesco8931]

No, they're called.......wait for it..........birds. They are descended from ancient dinosaurs. Sure, in a sense you can say "they're dinosaurs", but everything alive today is descended from bacteria, so are we all bacteria as well?

[@AgroAcro]

​​@@hongotedesco8931Birds actually are considered dinosaurs. They are Therapods, just like the T.rex and Velociraptor.

[@GatorBoyCL]

Bro did you watch the video

[@djayk9692]

42:50 Yes, dinosaur fossils completely embedded by feathers have indeed been commonly discovered. The classical ‘raptor’ has been found fully feathered within stone. Only Hollywood ignored that fact. Smaller dinosaurs are the only ones found with feathers.

[@WiseAsSerpentsHarmlessAsDoves]

Then how were dinosaurs with feathers non-avian if birds come from them? And why this recent claim of feathers found in fossils(about 15 years ago)of dinosaurs goes against the proven fact that t-rex for example was covered by scales and not feathers? And since no one can prove it's actually feathers in those fossils and not other structures resembling modern day birds feathers before birds even evolved them in the first place?

[@djayk9692]

@@WiseAsSerpentsHarmlessAsDoves When was the last time you looked a dinosaur species phylogenetic tree? Birds are a ‘type’ of dinosaur, or off-shoot of them; Avialae. Thus becoming ‘Avian’ in their own nature. They’re a smaller form of Theropods. Similar to the concept of a woolly mammoth versus modern elephant; with and without the expression of body hair. Many whale species indeed have body hair or follicles that they keep/lose with age. Morphology and body size can dictate how various genes are expressed. Larger dinosaurs had thicker hides, with the genetic expression of follicular feathers or downy feathers blocked but scales prioritized, while the opposite was seen with smaller dinosaurs.

[@hylaherping9180]

​@Originalongrace Feathered dinosaurs have been known since Darwin was alive, it is not a recent discovery. Feathers did not originally evolve for flight, they evolved for maintaining body temperature as theropods were endothermic like modern birds. We know this for certain because Dinosaurs like Oviraptor have been found fossilized while insulating a clutch of eggs. Oviraptor was definitely not a bird, but was a theropod. Not all theropods were feathered, as T-Rex was too large to need them for thermoregulation. Similar to how the largest mammals living today have very little hair. There is no argument that paleontologists have discovered feathers on some theropods. No one, not even you can honestly look at Anchiornis fossils and say that they aren't covered in feathers. It's so obvious what those are. Sinosauropteryx is a theropod with insulating fuzzy feathers, none evolved for flight or gliding. Birds specifically are theropod dinosaurs that modified their feathers for flight. The earliest birds flew, all species that are flightless now stem from flying ancestors. This becomes even more obvious when looking at Terror Birds, which are what happens when you try to make a large carnivorous theropod dinosaur out of a bird. Birds are dinosaurs. Everyone who studies paleontology knows this. There's way too much evidence to deny it. Besides feathers on theropods, birds have genes for teeth which look exactly like dinosaur teeth, they have identical leg bone shapes, they have a fusion of tail vertebrae called the pygostyle. Fusion of bones imply unfusion in an ancestor. Birds share most of their DNA with Crocodilians which are the only other archosaurs left. This makes sense because dinosaurs were archosaurs so birds would also be archosaurs. If you think birds aren't dinosaurs, you're either lying to yourself or just plain ignorant of paleontology, biology and genetics.

[@starskill7468]

​@@hylaherping9180i am not sure since my knowledge of dinosaurs is still growing and my meories are messed up, but wasn't it like birds had almost the exact genes that e.g a deinonychus had, they just aren't active?

[@hylaherping9180]

@starskill7468 I don't think there's any way we could know what genes Dinosaurs had because they are only know from fossils. No DNA preserved.

[@BrianJonesOneClearChoice]

I find this to be so real telling it like it is and it fits the biblical description . Thanks Answers In Genesis team! Keep up the good work!

[@hongotedesco8931]

Unfortunately it's not good work. It's a bunch of lies and misinformation that is being presented.

[@lucbos7516]

There is no god Grow up end stop believing in fairy tales

[@BrianJonesOneClearChoice]

@@hongotedesco8931 Ok so you Say lies are being told - What are they? If you are an unbeliever ok that is your choice , bust to say they are telling lies and just leave it at that is wrong.

[@BrianJonesOneClearChoice]

@@lucbos7516 Can you prove your statement? Tell me if there is no God where did DNA come from?

[@lucbos7516]

@@BrianJonesOneClearChoice First there was RNA and later DNA

[@darthakers6981]

I want to listen to the rest of the lecture

[@--..-...-..-.--....]

It ended with him saying "just joking I made it all up god doesn't exist"

[@gtrdoc911]

Please explain how God made Eve from a rib, how Jesus turned water to wine and walked on water, continental drift and the creation of the Himalayan mountains, radioactive decay, I could go on and on. The Bible is so blatantly wrong on so many things. As an electrical engineer you should know all of your knowledge has been gained from human discovery through the scientific method.

[@solotove]

@@gtrdoc911 They're miracles lol that's one of God's shticks considering he's omnipotent

[@CarlTuckersonn]

@@gtrdoc911 Genesis took the “made Eve from a Rib” from an older Sumerian creation story where Enki ate a forbidden fruit and got sick, and the earth mother goddess made a female goddess Ninti from his rib, to nurse and care for him… prior to him eating this fruit there was no sickness or death in the paradise land of Dilmun (basically Eden)…. the Sumerian tablets including this story are at least several hundred if not over a millennium older than any of the original source documents that the Bible was formed from during its composition/editing.

[@gtrdoc911]

@@CarlTuckersonn thanks for that story. Basically Judeo-Christian Holy tales are obviously man made literature adapted from older tales. Hard to believe in 2024 some people take that info as fact.

[@jesussaves4280]

Excellent! Thank you! Maranatha 🙌🏼🙏🥰

[@amark350]

@@danielhamid5569the higher up the food chain of knowledge you go, the more you realize you don’t know. You’d be surprised how smart and how much research people have put into the life and death of Christ. For every point you raise, I guarantee you there is a well thought out rebuttal. The fact you don’t know this, shows you haven’t had any real depth of research

[@inknochen_]

17:40 Abel had sheep; didn't they sacrifice a sheep to God? I bet they were also eating some sometimes, am I wrong? I think Adam and Eve, at least at that point weren't vegetarian.

[@TRFrench]

I had not even thought that this bird dinosaur thing is a grasp at transitionals that are not there. interesting

[@jockyoung4491]

Except that they obviously are there.

[@MikeysGirl2104]

As well as other transitionals

[@billjohnson9472]

Everyone talks about missing fossils but fail to identify precisely what they think is missing.

[@haggismcbaggis9485]

Yes, what would a half dinosaur/half bird look like? Caudipteryx perhaps?

[@yoeyyoey8937]

Wym? birds are dinos

[@shellbackbeau7021]

Thanks for sharing!

[@rickbrooks1974]

Turok son of Stone comics were epic.

[@80sFootballCards]

It amazes me how passionate and sure he is about ideas that are completely ridiculous.

[@ov3rload333]

What's ridiculous about them?

[@Danplays3000]

He does not understand paleontology

[@80sFootballCards]

@@ov3rload333 Everything.

[@sixfootoneistall2002]

@@ov3rload333 google everything he says. You will find that the majority of scientists completely disagree with most of it

[@stevelever83]

Every thing he said lol

[@gregwilkin6565]

Thank you for sharing. :)

[@Yurwastingyourtime]

I love how you guys stick up for the word of god and let it interpret itself

[@user-jq6cm2ct7e]

Well the word Behemoth is in the Bible and is proof that they did exist with God's creation, were people here back then, cave drawings show some types of dinosaurs again. Katt Kerr talks about how God ended the dinosaurs also at a specific time with an ice age hitting Earth which many people have found dinosaurs with food in their stomache's and frozen still today. How would that be done by God, by only a Prayer! He is the creator and has done a lot of things in the Bible with His People.

[@lucbos7516]

There is no god Grow up end stop believing in fairy tales

[@sirilay]

@gamingguru2602 Right. The book that's a copy of a copy of a translation of a translation, whose "most important"parts are anonymous and passed down orally for at least 30 years and strongly point to being copied off each other, is speaking for itself. How much have you fact checked, again?

[@GatorBoyCL]

@@lucbos7516Give it a chance,You may be interested,God loves you

[@WiseAsSerpentsHarmlessAsDoves]

​@@lucbos7516God exists as science and history demonstrate even if you don't want to have faith that's just the truth

[@ConnorMacgillivray-j1f]

I came to the lord via a true believer in evolution and the big bang. Yesterday to my surprise I fell to my knees in the street and apologized to Him for my blasphemy. I don't know if I can ever atone for my accumulated sin but I accept any punishment coming my way.

[@warpnin3]

Once you repented, and Jesus has taken away your sin, he doesn't punish you for them. Sometimes the consequences of our sins can be felt; one may have to go to prison for theft or murder, but God has forgiven and you will be saved when he returns

[@robertlott8766]

This was one of the points that drove me away from the church. I can't believe I fell for that.

[@onestoptechnologies7305]

I know... it wasn't until college that I realized how modern "science" had been lying to me for years and presenting their pseudo-scientific, God-hating religion as FACT... when it was really just lies supported by more lies! Seeing "millions of years of geologic layering" cut through from top to bottom by numerous petrified trees... really helped me see through their BS!

[@Nutritionwithmaya]

🤷‍♀️ what made you walk away?

[@danieldamico9775]

Smart man

[@robertlott8766]

@naturalsolutionswithmaya8317 Homestly, I never felt the way other people described having a relationship with God. I did everything I was told and more but never felt any supernatural presence. Then, I started listening to scientists, and it convinced me that Christianity was false. Idk if it is or not, but I'm seeing now that a lit of "science" is just another cult.

[@SandwichKing-lj4ej]

Go by your KJV bible, not what the church or experts tell you. See Jeremiah 4: 23-26, 2 Peter 3: 5-7, Isiah 45: 18, Isiah 14: 12-17, and Job 38. There was a prior creation destroyed universally and the rebuilt starting Genesis 1:2. Everything makes a lot more sense in the Bible and archeology when you understand this. Notice Satan so jealous of Mankind placed in charge of the earth after the days of creation. Mankind only around 6000 years or so but the earth is ancient.

[@wgterry73ify]

My church as a kid had a "movie" on God making dinosaur's (mid 80's)

[@davidmantooth1285]

I've seen pictures of dinosaurs but never actually saw one. I doubt that there were cameras in those days.

[@alantasman8273]

Peruvian Ica Burial Stones depict dinosaurs interacting with man as do Mexican Acambaro Figurines. In Glen Rose Texas a riverbed bottom was exposed after a storm and was found to contain a strata that included dinosaur and human footprints walking parallel to each other. One of the human footprints actually walked thorough the dinosaur footprint leaving a combination human a dinosaur footprint. When scientists were challenged by this fact...they said obviously there was a previous unknown dinosaur which had human feet....LOL.

[@avi8r66]

You are correct, there were no cameras available 66,000,000 million years ago.

[@avi8r66]

@@alantasman8273 Nothing you said was correct. Just wanted you to know that. If you want to prove me wrong I will need citations to follow up on. A lot of bad art from prehistoric times has been claimed as depicting dinosaurs, but it's always not what they claim, always. As for the glen rose riverbed prints, I have never seen anything where a scientist, an honest one not a creationist 'scientist' say something like 'there was a previous unknown dinosaur which had human feet'. The prints that seem human are a variety of things, depends on which specific impression you point to, but for the most part they are modified and/or eroded dinosaur prints, modified by creationists back in the 1930s to hype the 'find' and bolster their claims of humans and dinos living together. This game of faking evidence is not new in the creationist arena. Not unique to them, but very prevalent.

[@JB-yb4wn]

@@avi8r66 The Flinstones say otherwise.

[@avi8r66]

@@JB-yb4wn That there is some rock solid evidences BamBam.

[@perkins1439]

Can you imagine how crushed the scientists were when they found dinosaur and bird fossils side by side they don't want that to get out

[@kjellcarlsson5639]

And who did get it out? Scientists.

[@franciscomelendeze]

I've been seeing artwork of cretaceous birds and dinos coexisting ever since I was a kid in the 90s. No scientist ever said birds and dinos didn't coexist.

[@johnnyllooddte3415]

when we were in public school we were taught noahs fllood and Biblical geological time.. back then all scientists agreed with a worldwide flood 5 to 10,000 years ago.. within a few years the millions of years philosophy took over.. its very sad

[@adammarcusxi]

What year were you born?

[@koonta6079]

Evolutionists haven't fooled anyone. We have a tailbone- We evolved.

[@eurovisionwtf]

This made me feel closer to God. I love it.. thank you.

[@thomasmurrell6908]

It made me feel closer to throwing up listening to this nonsense.

[@lucbos7516]

There is no god The earth is 5 billion years old and the universe 13,7 billion years old Google the Webb and Hubble telescope and the speed of light

[@canadachandler7521]

This is like listening to a 4 year old explain quantum mathematics.

[@jasoncoetzeeadadjjzjdatune9617]

Man, these well produced scientifically hygienic features and presentations have the secular professors in tears. It would-be easier without this miracle to negotiate. The big bang is a stretch.

[@hongotedesco8931]

What's a stretch is "yeah, some guy walked on water, and then he turned into wine, and then he died, and then he resurrected, and then....". Now that my friend, is a stretch.

[@jasoncoetzeeadadjjzjdatune9617]

@@hongotedesco8931 it's more verifiable than string theory my friend , all happened, but irrelevant and foolish I admit, till you ask him, try it, supercharge your understanding, hes currently available and not what you imagine.

[@lewis18051]

@@jasoncoetzeeadadjjzjdatune9617😂😂😂😂

[@betsieswartz]

And it’s not a stretch to have a man ride from the dead

[@sjl197]

I’m a scientist, and this isn’t science.

[@tjsays8916]

For what will it profit a man if he gains the whole world, and loses his own soul? 37 Or what will a man give in exchange for his soul? Mark 8:36,37

[@jilltomfohr]

This video is so great. I was really into it and then it ends so abruptly!

[@baileypanama]

There’s plenty of the same subject on KZbin. DNA codes has never been observed to change to a new code to cause anything to evolve. That’s what they don’t tell you. Which means that evolution never and couldn’t happened

[@RobertA-oi6hw]

​@@LordMathiousnobody believes you here, you quack.

[@baileypanama]

@@LordMathious again, you have never seen DNA addd new information to cause any organism to evolve, mutation is not beneficial at all it’s actually lost of information you gain nothing new in mutation. An ape DNA will never magically change DNA code to a man’s genetic codes, if the slightest changes occur in the DNA 🧬 that ape anatomy will crumble it will die, which means the ape lungs and ribs will have to change…but in order for the ape rib to change the DNA code has to write it and add it. You have never seen this done or observed in any labs. All your parts have to be there at one time for you to live. Give me an example where you know or seen ape DNA 🧬 add new codes?

[@RobertA-oi6hw]

@@LordMathious you are proof that no matter how intelligent a person may be, you can still be a fool.

[@RobertA-oi6hw]

@@LordMathious creationist channels are full of the evidence you need but you can't accept it because you don't want God. I'm sorry but you are the one who is mistaken.

[@andrewmunz1639]

I thought this was serious not based on infant books and anecdotes Amen Ra!

[@mjbowman2004]

When God said, "Let there be light," I don't suppose it was a quiet moment. Call it a bang if you want.

[@eluclid]

that's not a edmontosaurus, idk what that thing is, but whatever it is, it's not a edmontosaourus, not to mention, no arms on the drawings. for the second one, "Have you ever watched the clouds go by and thought you saw one in the shape of an animal, or seen the "man in the moon"? These are examples of pareidolia-seeing what we believe to be a significant shape or pattern when it isn't really there. This phenomenon also explains the "dinosaur" on Kachina Bridge. Upon close inspection by Senter and Cole, the "sauropod dinosaur" turned out to be made up of distinct carvings and mud stains. It is definitely not a depiction of a single animal, and, viewed in detail, it looks nothing like a dinosaur. The separate carvings and mud stains only look like a dinosaur to those wishing to find one there."-Riley Black, Smithsonian magazine. Not to mention the original, isnt connected like what was depicted in thsi video, the legs didnt look like legs, more of a smudge of mud lol. Third one, those dont even look like wings, looks more like mountains/hills and a river and a big bird. fourth, now you tell me, what dinosaur is that? Fifth, that looks like no dinosaur I've ever seen. sixth, everyone belived in dragons back there, yet there's no proof of them, if i draw a unicorn having tea, does that mean i saw a unicorn having tea? "a fossil reptile of the Mesozoic era, in many species reaching an enormous size." "A more handy general definition would go something like this: Dinosaurs are extinct animals with upright limbs that lived on land during the Mesozoic Era (252 to 66 million years ago). This would basically capture how paleontologists long thought about dinosaurs. With a few exceptions (some pesky early crocodile relatives with upright limbs, for example), it still works if you’re thinking about “classic” dinosaurs: Brontosaurus, Stegosaurus, Triceratops, Tyrannosaurus, etc." by national park service "what-makes-a-dinosaur-a-dinosaur" that's what defines a dinosaur, not what ever you just said.

[@aahhhhhhhhhhhhh]

Believe in God or not this comment is factual info. these people are discrediting their beliefs by being so ignorant and its sad.

[@annmhmoore0771]

It looked more like the Lock Ness monster that people have taken pictures of.

[@erethesun]

I'm only about 26 mins in, so this may be answered later, but why don't we find fossils of other creatures (humans and animals) alongside dinosaur fossils? If everything except Noah, his family, and the ark animals died, then why aren't there thousands of humans and other animals found within the same rock layers as dinos? Not arguing at all; I believe the Bible. I'm just curious what the answer is to this.

[@Jewonastick]

The answer is because those species lived millions of years apart.....

[@tradertrav6414]

They have another video that goes over that in the channel. Humans found in limestone. Foot prints found together etc… animals have been found in the same layers as dinosaurs. No humans beside Dino’s tho. However, I personally wouldn’t want to live right by a 2 ton killing machine. Just my preference

[@erethesun]

I actually found a very informative article on their website that answered this. And no, I think too much not to be a Creationist. Thanks, though! 😂

[@kingconstantinusthesadisti133]

​@@tradertrav6414 they found delk footprint & dino paint in cave. But "expert" are ignoring it, theyre afraid.

[@Bhoddisatva]

A common mistake of Young Earth Creationists is demanding that Genesis must be literally true and not metaphor. This in spite of the fact God (through Jesus) used many metaphors throughout his ministry.

[@Meatsacks]

We make toys and stories about dinosaurs for kids today that doesn't mean we are living amongst them. Science and religion shouldn't be enemies. Religion answers the question of why and Science answers the question of how. If the two conflict then we are getting something wrong. God bless

[@us3rG]

Evolution is not science. Evolution is a religion Science is science

[@sixfootoneistall2002]

⁠@@us3rG explain then why there is an entire field of science dedicated to evolution? Why hasn’t it been thrown out yet? Why do the majority of scientists still claim that evolution is real and explains the diversity of life? Do you even know what evolution is?

[@gerardojuarez7940]

Billion years ago????…. Nonsense

[@jockyoung4491]

It is an established scientific fact that the Earth is over 4.5 billion years.

[@newcreationinchrist1423]

​@@jockyoung4491it's really not fact at all. It's the evolutionary presupposition based on your worldview.

[@jockyoung4491]

@@newcreationinchrist1423 It has nothing to do with "worldview". It is base solely on scientific observations using physical laws. And biological evolution has nothing to do with it.

[@tjsays8916]

​@@jockyoung4491😅😅😅😅 established fact eh?

[@g.o.b.2558]

​@@ji8044🤣 Jesus still loves you...

[@God_And_Gains]

I'm a Christian, but a question popped into my head about dinosaurs. If the Ark was able to hold baby dinosaurs why don't we see those dinosaurs alive today?

[@CraigWise-g5u]

Uhm. The ark had a shrink ray otherwise only some spieces of Dino would fit

[@Mothobius]

Because they were dead long before humans

[@PeaceMakerChad]

Read the book of enoch. When he was in heaven the angels took him to the end of the earth where he saw creatures he never saw before, flying creatures of diffirent colors and sounds. The truth is our world map is not actually how our earth is. We are not allowed to go to the ends of the earth because they make us believe it doesnt exist. Like we've already been everywhere but we havent

[@Mothobius]

@@PeaceMakerChad you obviously don't mean ends as in the earth being flat though right. Obviously not .

[@PeaceMakerChad]

@@Mothobius its literally in the bible and the entire book of enoch. Yes the earth is flat with pillars underneath. The reason it appears as a dome is because of the firmament. This is not my opinion. Its the truth bro. Enoch was given a tour of heaven and the earth and wrote what he saw so im going to trust him over theories in a science book. Educate yourself. Read the book of enoch its absolutely amazing

[@cathy7382]

As a child I was fascinated by dinosaurs, I remember checking out all the books for kids from the library about the subject I was disturbed that they died out Now fast forward with better understanding especially after seeing Jurassic Park I would be terrified seeing one now Praise God for His great power!

[@dodgecrockett3474]

Cathy, I'm not sure I understand what you're trying to say. Are you saying that children's books on dinosaurs are unscientific and Jurassic Park is scientific?

[@hongotedesco8931]

Yes, be glad you don't have to roam around with T-rex. But the dinosaur existence and extinction had nothing to do with god. It had to do with the violent universe we live in. The same thing could happen to us at any point in the future.

[@sm360zfx]

What's your favourite dinosaur mine's the Triceratops

[@matfoster4856]

If you trusted your God, they would be as nothing. I'm not a person of faith, but don't understand how you claim to believe, yet, lack so much.

[@matfoster4856]

​@@sm360zfxmegatriceralodon

[@reinhardtgallowitz5344]

This was a fantastic presentation.

[@SoWeird66]

as a stand up comedy?

[@Malco47]

I am a Christian. I believe in God, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. I have watched many of these videos espousing the young earth philosophy. And I ask, "why". Why do Christians use their time and energy trying to convince Christians and non-Christians that the Earth is 6000 years old? It is such folly! You don't know how God created the Earth and the Heavens. There are MANY interpretations of Genesis. Experts in theology differ in their interpretations of the true meanings of Genesis. Arrogant men, burdened by their egos, insist that their opinions and interpretations are "true". I do not believe that the Earth and the Universe are only 6000 years old. That does not make me any less a Christian or any less a Believer than those who insist otherwise. God was and is capable of creating all that exists in any way He chose. Stop arguing over the details of how he chose to do so! God is Love. Self-righteous ego is not.

[@thurmansmithjr3149]

The young earth theory would be comical but for the tragedy of convincing the world that Christians are lunatics. Why would they believe anything else you might say, including the gospel?

[@Alfonso88279]

I am also a Christian. And I agree with you. But I know why they spend time and money trying to convince them. They are not spending. They are investing. It's part of the scam.

[@chuenteo2177]

Because Bible is the only Truth. The real history book. Secular world uses their doctrines to mislead the youth today. Christian should not compromise in God's Word and His authority, IMHO. In God's eyes, only truth and lies. Yes or no. No grey area. Biblical view is important. It is the only truth. If they can alter a small truth like this, then they can say Jesus is just like fairy tale, that's exactly what the enemy plans, to confuse and challenge the Bible. They are already saying it, Christianity is just one of the many religions. It's wrong. Religions are man doctrines not of God, lies. Christianity is not a religion but a relationship with Jesus Christ, God. Think about how the devil deceived Eve, with just a small twist. Teaching our kids from young with Bible stories as foundation is important. They will be challenged by the world view. If their foundation is not strong, they can be easily swayed. May Abba Father have mercy and grace upon our youths and help them stand firm in God's truth. They are not trying to convince people, because without The Holy Spirit no one can see the Truth. Only God can change a person's heart. They are witnessing God's Truth. The rest is in God's hands. Our job as a Christian is to share the gospel of Jesus Christ and share God's truth.

[@davidwilliams912]

The Devil believes in the Father, Son and Holy Spirit does that make him a Christian also? What's your point? So, everyone who disagrees with you has a self- righteous egos. How about proving your point. True Christians believe that the Word of God is True! Are you not arguing?????

[@jayonnaj18]

No way do I believe the earth is billions of years old! My trust and faith is in the TRUE GOD and HIS HOLY WORD THE BIBLE which states that "In the beginning GOD created the heaven and the earth!" He adorned this earth in Six 24 hours days, crowning His creation with Adam and Eve! All of my Lord's creatures were made with the appearance of age, male and female, and it didn't take Him billions of years to do it! Anyone doubting Creationism is not a UNSAVED person in my view!

[@robertmyers6865]

The creation of the heavens and the earth were ALL done in Gen. 1:1!!!!!!! Verse 2 was the beginning of the restoration of the earth, after the fall of Satan in the battle. The FACT IS, we are still living in the 7TH Day yet!!!!!!!! Read the Bible! It has NOT ended yet, until Jesus comes!

[@giuseppesavaglio8136]

Willful ignorance on display, great video.

[@kevinrtres]

Seems somewhat better than trying to explain abiogenesis. That's just sheer blind faith....

[@giuseppesavaglio8136]

@@kevinrtres Hi, thanks for the reply. At least abiogenesis gives us one testable avenue for the origin of life. Blind faith ..well that's the purview of some religious people. cheers G

[@kevinrtres]

@@giuseppesavaglio8136 Well, yes...that's the purview of some religious people...like those who ardently believe in naturalism - it's a religious belief system. Well said. As for testing it - well, so far all outcomes spell the death knell for it - for about 6000 years it's been observed that anything that dies never comes back to life all by itself - daily 150k+ people bear witness to that. It's a solid fact. Nothing that is dead ever arises into life all by itself - of its own accord. And get this - those just-died biological entities have their constituents in mostly the right biological order - yet they cannot perform the simple trick of kick-starting themselves back into life. So how much more difficult is it for the random material to first form itself into the right order - before attempting the impossible task of kick-starting itself into life. Real life observations. Fully documented. Verified. Solid, concrete evidence. What more could the ardent atheist/naturalist ask for??????

[@wretchedsoullikemine]

@@giuseppesavaglio8136”abiogenesis is testable” Abiogenesis must be considered speculative considering that every living cell ever observed has come from another living cell. It thus falls into the same evidentiary category as extrasensory perception, which has similarly failed every rigorous scientific test of its existence. Womp womp maybe next time you’ll sound smart.

[@giuseppesavaglio8136]

@@wretchedsoullikemine Hi, thanks for the reply. ”abiogenesis is testable” An avenue that is testable. "Abiogenesis must be considered speculative considering that every living cell ever observed has come from another living cell." Cells consists of atoms. Atoms are the building blocks of all things on Earth, both living and non-living. All the components of a cell, such as the cell membrane, cytoplasm, DNA, are made up of atoms. For example, the cell membrane is made up of fat, and fat is made up of carbon, hydrogen, and oxygen atoms. "It thus falls into the same evidentiary category as extrasensory perception, which has similarly failed every rigorous scientific test of its existence. No it does not. Cells and atoms can be tested upon, extrasensory perception, as you point out has "failed every rigorous scientific test of its existence". "Womp womp maybe next time you’ll sound smart." Womp Womp yourself. cheers G

[@jasonfowler1986]

Evolutionists believe in millions of years in earth's past with no hope of anything in the future for themselves once they have died where as christianity has a great hope for the future in Eternity with the Creator.

[@jockyoung4491]

The two have nothing to do with each other. Evolution is purely science and can't say anything about faith or God or the future. Many Christians accept the science of evolution.

[@tone9358]

& kids who believe in Santa have every year to look forward to leaving him milk & cookies. Even if heaven was a better alternative to nothing, it doesn’t matter if it’s not real.

[@stevepierce6467]

As an evolutionist, I see my time on earth as the time I have to live my life. After I die, I will rot away and become nutrients for new living beings. I have no fear of death; I figure it will be just the same as all the thousands/millions of years before I was born, years I have no experience or memory of.

[@rambodave]

This is what makes Christianity so hard to believe.

[@beliefbite]

Which part? Just remember this is only one small segment of Christianity

[@rambodave]

@@beliefbite this guy has zero evidence for anything. He just tries to poke holes in solid logic and science. He is about as convincing as flat earthers or people who think aliens built the pyramids or Atlantis.

[@Mothobius]

Trust me we aren't all like this.

[@triciamoon6312]

​@Mothobius I'm genuinely curious why you chose to disparage your brother in Christ and take Satan's bait here. What part of his talk did you think was so far-fetched? Everything he said he gave examples for?

[@rambodave]

@triciamoon6312 Satan's bait oh man you are too far gone. Look it's been a while since I watched this garbage but I skimmed it again. This guy has zero idea of anything about science, the physical world, or anything. I think answers in genesis and people like this are an insult to creation. They choose to cherry pick misrepresent and destroy any advance of human intellectual progress because God. That's a legitimate insult to the true creator of this reality, universe, time, space, and dimensions. The creator God if you want to call it that created all we see and called upon us to understand it. That's called science. These hacks are an insult to God and I will never respect that. Amd no Christian should they are doing themselves a disservice.

[@tonirivas5010]

God bless and protect you, your family, and ministry in Jesus Christ precious Name Amen.

[@avafury4584]

God's word coming to life! God bless you 🙏❤

[@je-freenorman7787]

Religion is a total scam Government is nothing but a religous cult

[@liquidpza]

Everyone coming here to be prescribed a remedy for their existential curiosities and blindly receiving a double dose of epistemological anesthesia. I truly pray that you break free and come to welcome the universe in all its brilliant entirety.

[@americanpatriot7247]

Liquidpza - Yes, the universe that God created. Beyond amazing!!!

[@Jesus_is_the_1way]

So glad I found this sermon cause I’ve always wondered about dinosaurs and have asked other fellow Christian’s and they really didn’t know much about the topic either…

[@brianzane5748]

Please look to actual science and not this fantastical, delusional nonsense. This is so wrong it's not funny.

[@TheMarvelousMrsMarquez]

@@brianzane5748If Lucifer is real and many other demonic angels, than yeah, God is real, too. I know it’s hard for some to understand, but that’s because you were brainwashed. Satan is literally everywhere. Or, let me guess. It’s “art.” 🙄

[@brianzane5748]

@@TheMarvelousMrsMarquez quite the opposite, actually. I was raised with religion around me, but loosely enough that I avoided being indoctrinated. Nothing steered me away but rational, critical thinking. Nobody told me not to believe. You say lucifer is real because someone told you. You would likely not dream that up on your own, as there's zero evidence for such an entity existing outside of people's minds. Zero. If you have credible evidence, I'm all eyes.

[@montychiton]

@YarrumDrabhtor Actual science is when you work towards an answer (with doubt, with errors etc.), biblical "science" is when you work towards an outcome (the literal truth of the bible).

[@montychiton]

@@TheMarvelousMrsMarquez Who is brainwashed here? Certainly the god worshippers. If you were born and brought up elsewhere in this world you would be running after another deity which as much vehemence!

[@spatrk6634]

notice how he is trying to equate evolution with religion. "evolution is just a religious worldview" he subconsciously knows religions are unreasonable.

[@feetyeet8538]

I think the leviathan is the Chinese dragon Cause Job lived in the East which is where Asia is and the Chinese Dragon fits the description perfectly 🐉 🐉 🐉 🐉

[@onthewall7]

That's the first time I've ever heard that one... got any bible to support that? The location of the 'land of Uz' is speculated on a lot, but its pretty widely agreed to be in the "Middle East" which isn't very close to China at all.

[@tjsays8916]

Very possible

[@Dulc3B00kbyBrant0n]

@@onthewall7 classic double self liked comment. that means what it said was true

[@haggismcbaggis9485]

Uzbekistan is close to China.

[@beliefbite]

Leviathan is most likely a mythological symbol representing death, evil, and chaos, who is associated with the underworld.

[@tl4633]

Good stuff.

[@johnlinden7398]

If this bible / christian apologist had any credability whatsoever he would be debating this subject with a paleolithic expert instead of just SPUING out fast talking nonsense !

[@crusadercatwoman02]

Darwinist Evolutionist fairytales have no credibility whatsoever, and they already have Paleolithic bone experts and research data from the RATE group in 1999, which again prove the Creationist Truth.

[@AmmaMama-xi3nu]

He's mostly preaching to the choir, and you're not in it. "He who has ears to hear, let him hear."

[@Alfonso88279]

@@AmmaMama-xi3nu Dude, think for yourself. What you are implying is that people should only talk to those who will agree with them. That's crazy.

[@xenoluck]

@@Alfonso88279if that's what you took from that, then you are truly lost my friend

[@proudboomer-j8q]

So that means whenever teachers and college professors are spewing their lies in the classrooms, they have no credibility since they don't have a Christian apologist standing there arguing with them? Oh, and BTW, I don't think "credability" is the correct spelling. Also, I assume you meant spewing instead of "SPUING".

[@manuelteixeira2496]

This is absolutely necessary to be taught that humans coexisted with dinosaurs.

[@bvon5630]

It’s impossible to be an atheist. ✝️You have to know everything in order to say there is no God. ✝️And because it’s impossible to know everything, it’s impossible to be an atheist. ✝️It’s time for seekers to face spiritual reality and shift from atheist to agnostic. ✝️Keep seeking and don’t give up. You will find Jesus eventually.❤️❤️❤️✝️✝️✝️🙏🙏🙏

[@jockyoung4491]

You are correct that claiming there MUST not be a god is a matter of faith. But most "atheists" simply view the idea of God as unlikely and unnecessary.

[@haggismcbaggis9485]

Couldn't you also say that you have to know everything to say there is a god? What if there is some definitive evidence out there that disproves it?

[@avi8r66]

Ok, let's correct your programming a bit. You do not need to 'know everything' to be an atheist. Not even close. You simply need to have enough of a grasp on reality, and some critical thinking skills, and refuse to grant exceptions just to make a story work out the way you like it. In other words, you need to have a consistent standard of evidence for any claims that are important in your life. If someone tells you they will sell you a bridge for $10 you are right to demand some evidence they have the right to do this. It's a very basic thing people usually learn early in life. Well, same here. Someone tells you that there is a supernatural being watching your every moving, that will sit in judgement over you, and that it demands you live your life a certain way, and give money to his representatives, they should have some credible evidence that you can verify satisfactorily to back that claim up. Theism lacks anything resembling credible evidence. So, preachers and apologists have gone to a lot of trouble to create pseudo evidence, and this video is a beautiful example of what I am talking about. To make this 'evidence' work they are asking you to ignore reality, to not do any valid research, to make exceptions to allow for their story to be true. Their phd holders are shills, unethical people willing to take money to fabricate false 'science' and data. Bodie is one, another is Steve Austin, there are quite a few. They know how the science works so they also know how to do what looks like real science to an outsider but get results they want, or, results that make the tech look unreliable. They do this all the time to try and discredit radiometric dating, something that is highly reliable on a consistent basis and is widely used in a number of ways.

[@stevepierce6467]

Whatchu talkin'bout, Willis? Impossible to be an atheist? Here I am, being one right now. I don't say there is no god, just that I have not seen any evidence compelling enough to make me believe in a god answering to any of the descriptions of gods I have been presented so far.

[@NorthernGrit]

I’m not an atheist. I don’t believe in god. I don’t think about god but the word ‘atheist’ is your word. You need a word to describe what I am; but I don’t.

[@nikkistump3480]

Great video!

[@bossxaustin]

confirmation bias, ignorance, negligence and more

[@yoeyyoey8937]

This guy?

[@bossxaustin]

@@yoeyyoey8937 ??

[@kelicajohnston9990]

The book of Enoch states that the Nephelim were cross breeding animals, making potions so the women couldn't get pregnant, teaching a lot of things God didn't want humans to know.

[@tommytommy7096]

Absolutely amazing love this stuff….

[@williambunter3311]

Thank you for this fascinating and informative video. I've never believed in dinosaurs, but now I can envision them biblically.

[@adelinomorte7421]

***believing in anything will never change what was, be and will come to be.***

[@williambunter3311]

@@adelinomorte7421 Absolutely! What the bible says will happen will happen whether people believe it or not!

[@genome616]

You do know this video is full of BS, nothing they say has any verifiable evidence and is only made up to try fit a biblical version of history, a version in itself that cannot be verified either.

[@skinnflint]

Now fully brainwashed

[@DavidSmith-kf4ge]

What a load of gibberish..... so if I talk fast I must be more believable 😂😂😂😂

[@Woopor]

0:23 there is no “technical” definition of a dinosaur, dinosaurs are clearly defined, well charted animals not just an term for any upright lizard. First minute and you don’t even know a single thing about dinosaurs. What dinosaur would that even be? It looks more like a dragon painting than any dinosaurs we know.

[@marschlosser4540]

OK, and your science is?

[@universoullifebalance]

Dinosaurs are a myth…

[@blake350z]

When the education system has failed you… you end up here on KZbin on this channel 😂😂 this might as well be an SNL Skit.

[@CraigWise-g5u]

This is the education system of the future

[@amtheminer3803]

Im here due to the reconmended system

[@Mansplainer452]

Your prolific use of grammar is proof thereof.

[@drum7121]

Just look at the channels this guy is subscribed to and you notice, hes a huge materialist.

[@user-dj9gg1sq9q]

God Rules !!!!

[@Jewonastick]

Rules what? Which gawd?

[@leebrown8029]

The Word of God says, "do not lean on your own understanding." Amen and amen!

[@Jewonastick]

Any rational thinking human being should immediately see that an enormous red flag.

[@richardgregory3684]

You don;t see a problem with a book that literally says "thinking for yourself is dangerous, just think what you are told to think" ...?

[@woodyobi]

And good god says though I be you are you but afraid of me

[@ams3004]

Dragons are powerful creatures in Chinese mythology. They’re associated with the ability to control the seasons, time, and harvests. Why would you wear them???

[@killer8781]

Wonder if any of these people believe in modern medicine. Would they receive chemotherapy if they had cancer? if the answer is yes you should know that we use the same principles to make that chemotherapy as we used for the knowledge of evolution. Many discoveres of modern medicine are based on evolution knowledge and logic.

[@ewaldrempel9924]

This must be one of the dumbest comments I have read in a long time! „Many discoveries of modern medicine are based on evolution knowledge and logic“…🤣🤣🤣 Would you care to give an example?🤣😂😅

[@Jewonastick]

@@ewaldrempel9924 Evolution is one of the central core tenants of biology, and not understanding it, means you will have large holes in your understanding of biology.

[@ewaldrempel9924]

@@Jewonastick Says who? I am a chemist and we had enough biology in college during my studies…enlighten me, which part of the evolution THEORY is supposed to be a „core tenant of biology“?

[@jockyoung4491]

@@ewaldrempel9924 Biological evolution is the organizing principle of biology. EVERYTHING in biology is based on it. Without it you would have just a bunch of unrelated observations. Biological evolution is how life works.

[@ewaldrempel9924]

@@jockyoung4491 That is total nonsense!

[@Joshua-vl5pc]

Evolution is proven

[@junglelawman728]

LOL!

[@Joshua-vl5pc]

@@junglelawman728 what? Where is your evidence that it’s not

[@junglelawman728]

@@Joshua-vl5pc Your claim.... you provide the evidence.

[@Joshua-vl5pc]

@@junglelawman728 Natural selection Dna mutation Fossil record Observable changes Do you have discord? We can debate there if you want

[@globalcoupledances]

@junglelawman728 - I can add evidence of comparative physiology and biochemistry, comparative anatomy, biogeography, speciation, coloration, behavior, mathematical modeling and simulation

[@markross2124]

How's about the sightings of lake monstera such as Ogo Pogo, Lake Champlain, and of course loch ness in Scotland. Also, sightings in the Congo and Camaron of a Diplodocus and maybe even many other types of Dinasaur like creatures.

[@Jewonastick]

How about the fact that those sightings NEVER have been confirmed?!

[@bigcorky4687]

I'm scottish and everyone here knows the Loch Ness monster was a hoax to promote early tourism, some people will believe anything that they are told

[@billjohnson9472]

Funny, now that everyone carries cameras in their pockets these sightings have disappeared. Coincidence?

[@stevepierce6467]

How's about that? Not a single solitary actual real sighting!

[@NewEnglandPilgrim]

How about mokele mbembe in the congo? Kent Hovind did a video all about dinosaur sightings which included this one.

[@sl-rt5kv]

A big problem with the claim that all the rock layers described in the video, were layed down in a year is that completely different animal groupings are found in different layers. For example, you can find Dimetrodon, Trilobite, and Anteosaurus fossils in the Permian layer, but you'll never find Woolly mammoth, Tyranosaur, or Eryops fossils there. Allosaurus, Diplodichus, and Stegosaurus fossils can be found in the Jurassic layer, but you won't find Sabre-Toothed Tiger, Arthropleura, Tyranosaurus, Velociraptor, Radiondontia, or Human fossils there, You can find Arandapis, Eurypterids, and Sacabambascis fossils in the Ordovician layer, but will never find Triceritops, Eryops, Dimetrodon, Mososaur, Gorilla, or Mastadon fossils there. And so on. This is indicative of fossils laid down at different times containing different groups of animals as opposed to all the layers being deposited in a few years. If the later were the case, you would expect greater mixing of fossils being layers. Additionally, scientists have been able to obtain radiometric dates for each of these layers when they are sandwiched between layers of igneous rock containing radioactive isotopes. They often can corroborate dates found with on isotope with those taken using a different isotope. The differences in dates found for each of these layers support the idea that the differences in animal groupings found in each layer are consistent with different time periods.

[@erikfreezer6282]

Show the Ba'ka people of the DRK a pic of a Apatosaurus and tell them they died out 50.or 100.000000 million years ago. 😅

[@billjohnson9472]

you know fossils have been found for all of history. and people made up stories about the fantastic creatures that they must have been. the whole fossil thing is older than humanity and writing. so of course people have ancient stories abotu them.

[@michaelszczys8316]

I like where white men go into the Congo where Mokele Mbembe lives. They show a kids picture book of animals and the people all point to where they live. Animals of the jungle like leopards and lions. When they come to picture of grizzly bear they are terrified. The white men tell them it is from their country. When they come to a picture of brontosaurus type dinosaur all the people point to where ' Mokele Mbembe lives. Then they tell the story of recent times where a tribe caught one and killed it. They tried eating it but the meat made them sick. It is very territorial and will kill people but not eat them.

[@billjohnson9472]

@@michaelszczys8316 right, where is this documented? who are these white men?

[@michaelszczys8316]

@@billjohnson9472 in different videos made by various different explorers in the past 20 - 30 years.

[@billjohnson9472]

@@michaelszczys8316 so some anonymous dudes making videos. right. in science we write it complete reports detailing the data collection process.