Exiting Atmosphere Starfield Vs Star Citizen

[@shesaidshewaslvl18]

just so people know in star citizen there is no cuts or cutscenes when travelling out of atmosphere my game just bugged when getting into the ship so i cut that out in the video

[@alexmayer8943]

no mans sky same as star citizen and 100 times better than starfield.

[@MVH_Magnilson]

But Starfield is a game while Star Citizen is financial experiment

[@Janchi27]

​@@MVH_Magnilsonwrong, its a gaming experiment.. Pushing the limits of PC gaming... and Not just making money for personal profit...

[@the_babbleboom]

so instead of a loading screen, which you left in, you have bugs getting into ships, which you cut out. sums up the difference between both games well enough.

[@the_babbleboom]

@@Janchi27 the only limits it is pushing is seeing how far they can push the limits of their cultist following by pulling one BS after another without backlash, lol

[@devreeserobrecht154]

being able to land and take off your own way makes it way more fun (atleast for me)

[@Esotericspirits]

Don't be afraid my fried it is indeed more more fun, starfield fans are just coping

[@MVH_Magnilson]

No doubt

[@ZeuSLocS36]

Say what you must a lot time is saved w cut scenes then taking 10 fucking minutes to get from the ground out to outer space js crunch the numbers 24 hours in a day an most of your Scam Citizen time is being used landing an taking off…. O yeah it’s also has a dead player base an is still a beta after 17 years… if anybody has had an OD amount of Cope -E-um it’s Scam Citizen Subscribers…. Lol 😂

[@flanerqstro3531]

@@Esotericspirits we are not coping, we know it is way more fun, but you sometimes have to make sacrifice something for another, star citizen is way more buggy than starfield, and I don't understand why. they literally have millions of dollars for about more than 6years and the game is still unfinished, and plus the game is one of the most dropped, i have never seen a casual gamer playing it and not dropping it, the system requirements are too high and plus there not even a descent story in the game.

[@Jasonlopez-e5x]

@@Esotericspirits Actual gameplay > Taking off over and over

[@RookieGamerz-3110]

Not tried starcitizen but looks amazing. Space game without take off and landing is a joke.

[@shesaidshewaslvl18]

It is a incredible game but its full of bugs , if the could get all the bugs fixed and give us more things to do it would be some experience

[@Fishincan]

Originally Star Citizen was actually more like Starfield, you would only be able to land on specific areas on planets.

[@Degenevesting]

@@FishincanWell it looks like they have brains at RSI.

[@devreeserobrecht154]

@@shesaidshewaslvl18 yeah that be true as fuck, although ive been playing it this week and haven't yet encountered any bug myself apart from salvage missions that simply are to hard to get 100% done. i think Star Citizen as of now with what we got.... is best enjoyable in big events, created by players untill sc finally releases something big again. i bet of the sc community organized a lot more... community team fleet battles.... or races... or planetary wars... like pretend to fight over a planet for several days... with ground vehicles and drop ships but no air/space combat as a rule. i think it would help people love the game a bit more... in a different way

[@tim8993]

@@shesaidshewaslvl18starfield is not incredible lol

[@penguins0301]

SC: Freedom. SF: flying inside the box with invisible walls

[@the_babbleboom]

SC: being stuck in Area18 because the elevators or trams broke again with no alternative routing, ships exploding randomlyin spawn, spawning below ground, not spawning at all or with massive delay, punishing players by locking ships for an hour after the servers crashed and "30k protection" did what it always does: fuck all... keep coping chris-cultist.

[@Reichsritter]

@@the_babbleboom star citizen is pretty good but needs a lot of work, starfield has a lot of limits set by Bethesda. Don't be so emotional, they're just games

[@Napster60]

​@@the_babbleboom Uh literally every issue you just said comes and goes with patches and can be avoided by just swapping to another server.. top of that it's not even that common. So who's coping?

[@BaldVulture87]

Comparing Star citizen to starfield is like comparing Amra 3 to Fallout 4. Sim, vs RPG. how do you even begin to compare that without sounding dumb?

[@penguins0301]

​@@BaldVulture87Let me make it clear. I'm a big fan of Bethesda i played both SC and SF games are good, no hate on any game . We are discussing the content of this video, so i'm simply telling the truth. Why are you get offended ? hating on everyone doesn't make them love Starfield you know.

[@nosferatu_dracula]

Dude didn't even close the door or raise landing gear. SMH

[@shesaidshewaslvl18]

i closed the door but it bugged out when I got into ship

[@absboodoo]

@@shesaidshewaslvl18 The authentic Star Citizen experience. lol

[@shesaidshewaslvl18]

@@absboodoo lol i load into area 18 and every npc is stuck in the middle under the ball game was so buggy last 2 days

[@absboodoo]

@@shesaidshewaslvl18 Backed the game back in 2014, I'm remaining hopeful but am in no hurry to play until a more stable and feature complete build is available. lol

[@cwegga]

I was coming here to say he's flying around with his landing gear out like a doofus just like I do.🤣

[@loudradialem5233]

One of the big problems with Starfield is the transition. You have a cutscene, then it abruptly ends with a black screen, then you are in space. This is so bad. A studio with the budget Bethesda has should at least play a cutscene of you exiting the atmosphere and smoothly give the controls back to you.

[@czarekdupa]

I didn't think that loading screens were that big of an issue but now seeing gameplay of starfield I appreciate star citizens way of doing things so much more

[@steveo0127]

5 loading screens just to get into space just to jump into another loading screen and one more to land 😂

[@ChemicalShots]

I was hoping starfield would of took some features from star citizen like the landing and take off, flying round the planets. I'm not even sure if it's possible to do from modding since even the modding is super restricted due to the engine. Thats why there is no big crowds

[@flanerqstro3531]

If starfield was like star citizen and so ambitious, it could not even work on a gaming pc

[@MaxkillerV2Gaming]

I don't wanna point out the obvious but it is a Bethesda game, people really expect so much from this game to copy NMS or this "game", and its honestly on you for expecting that. SC is a space sim where as SF is RPG, the point of space in SF is to have combat and trade and loot or steal other ships and sell around with other NPCs.

[@Degenevesting]

@@MaxkillerV2GamingYeah but mate did you not see any of the marketing? Did you not see what this game was billed as? Bethesda went out of their way to make us expect something similar. Now it could have been something accelerated like No Mans Sky, and that’s totally fine! Gameplay, not cutscene. That has been Bethesda since inception. Then, they stray from it for the first time ever for the in-atmosphere flight of their space-opera rpg, and we’re supposed to just look past that? We expect the jank. We don’t expect missing major features, regardless of how buggy it’d be. It’s never stopped them before.

[@RyanlovesTh]

Thats why SC is still in alpha

[@MaxkillerV2Gaming]

@@Degenevesting You clearly did not watch the Starfield showcase, they LITERALLY told you EVERYTHING that you can do. Please tell me where did they show you can fly around like in No Man Sky during that showcase. The point of space in Starfield is just for combat, trading, starting mission or looting other abandoned fleets and scanning planets to look for resources that's it. They showed all that in that 1 hour showcase, and honestly your fault for expecting to much and not paying attention.

[@EwokHunter27]

Star citizen = realism

[@enilarias2123]

yeah but you dont have nothing to do on that game X,D!!!!, only buy ships

[@ph11p3540]

​@@enilarias2123There's lots to do with more being added. Star Citizen is not going to hold your hand when you hear a rumor or stumble upon info, then you act on said info andinvent your own quest. There's dozens of self directed things you can do and end up with cool encounters and loot. It's only going to get better

[@juhannusruusu]

when it will be fully released i'm gonna play it, until then ... starfield ... because of MODS and singleplayer ... anyway I have played a little of star citizen, I like it but all I did was buying ships and chill in the space, exploring planets, it's good but it's getting bored@@ph11p3540

[@patientmental875]

@@ph11p3540 Get better when? Ive been playing for 8 years & its the same thing over & over! Work endlessly just looting through bugs & disconnects to build up your character just to get wiped & repeat! But hey dont forget to buy more ships!

[@captainmurk3745]

@@enilarias2123It's a simulation of life 930 years from now. So, according to your comment, life is pointless. Don't stop there, use your imagination ;)

[@ZeJuank]

so SF is just cut scenes?

[@lowserver2]

cut scenes and loading screens 💀

[@MenderSlen579]

​@@lowserver2so much for next gen

[@ThePuma1707]

and lots, lots of walking

[@uberlags7022]

Unoptimized too

[@jonathanj.3695]

Elite Dangerous, Star Citizen and No Man's Sky all have seamless planetary take offs and landings that you control, and all are much older games. Starfield has a half-assed animation and loading screen that pops you into space automatically like it's a Wal-mart bargain bin version of all of these games. Elite Dangerous, a 10 year old game, mind you, has far better space combat, far better sound design and far better take offs and landings than Starfield. Star Citizen may have been in development Hell since 2016, but it still has far better improvements than anything Bethesda has released in the passed 10 years and actually put effort into what it's presented so far, unlike what we got with Starfield. No Man's Sky...Hell. Even this game manages to do things better than Starfield and that's just sad because it's Hello Games' FIRST triple-A game!

[@hantront]

As much as I dislike comparing these two, as they're two fundamentally different games, I just have to say: Starfield fans: "Nooooo theres nothing wrong with my game! Its perfect in all ways possible" Star Citizen fans: "There is so much wrong with my game, I cant decide wether to love it or hate it most of the time and I dont expect anyone else to enjoy it as much as I do"

[@GraveDigger388]

Seems to be the case, doesn't it. I mean under many hype videos about how SF is gonna be a "Star Citizen killer", many of the top comments are like " I'm a Star Citizen backer, I hope Starfield pulls it out".

[@tres155]

Starcitizen: better simulation and immersion and multiplayer Starfield: has a story and characters (as of right now)

[@HungryEatNow]

One is a game and one is a simulator

[@manassikdar1]

one is a 500 million dollar scam

[@erwinr7173]

@@manassikdar1 you sure knows a lot about scam

[@manassikdar1]

@@erwinr7173 because I scam your poor old grandmother every tuesday

[@islamdefenderpl]

@@manassikdar1 I'd like to see you make a game like this.

[@jeckek9936]

SF has no business requiring the hardware it needs to run.

[@lrgege5854]

Dont destroy SC with take off like this :D

[@tobytoxd]

N !! Press N !! ;)

[@joshhobson2340]

For anyone that hasn’t played star citizen, take this information from someone who has put hundreds of hours and invested a lot of money in it (me). Star citizen is revolutionary. Being able to enter your ship, walk through it and then fly it from ground to atmosphere is an unforgettable experience. The space combat is S tier. Ground combat also feels good when the AI isn’t buggy as hell. However, because of this, it means that It takes HOURS just to do a simple task or one mission. This eventually gets very repetitive and at some points tedious. The game is bare bones. The bugs are inexcusable. After 10 years and nearly 1 billion dollars in funding, star citizen has still not released any form of story or developed outside of 1 star system. It suffers from a serious case of scope creep that is cause more and more features to be delayed for other less important features. Bethesda has been able to create, develop and release a single player experience that in the time it has taken star citizen to still remain in alpha. People do not understand the effort and technology it takes for a game to have seemless flying. It is not currently doable with the technology and time that developers have.

[@dazzaMusic]

Star Citizen is a game that’s just way ahead of its time it’s like the Concorde of the gaming universe

[@kristijanceple6026]

Yeah but one is an indie studio and the other is a AAA dev Outer wilds, elite dangerous and no mans sky all have seamless flying and are finished games - also made by indies

[@kristijanceple6026]

But I do agree that aiming for star citizen's level of detail and realism is an exponential difficulty slope that is just an overkill A simple, fun, and casual astrophysics model would have been enough, and not too hard to create

[@trinityx3o522]

​@@kristijanceple6026planets in NMS & Elite are their own separate instances, while in Star citizen, the entire star system is in the same instance. You can even see your party member's marker regardless of where they are

[@sonodietrodithe4iltuoincub848]

​@@kristijanceple6026I didn't know that a game developed by thousands of people and with a budget of over 500 million was still classified as an indie besides outer wilds is an awful example since the planets on that game are all on a really small scale

[@sebby533]

I like how before they even presented anything they were like “ In starfield, we want space travel to feel like its hard” then proceeds to cut screen everything and force the players to use fast travel. Its like don’t hype it up like no mans sky or star citizen if thats not what the games gonna be lmao. Honestly star citizen feels a lot like the outer worlds to me or it’ll probably also be a lot like that upcoming Jedi game where you can “free roam” the universe, but everythings just a secret cut screen. Its like whats the point if you can’t even fly or land your spaceship by yourself

[@phil8899]

SC just lags like hell..

[@Treya91]

If you have not tried star citizen. Do yourself a favor, grab a soda sit down and play it, learn it, and you will love it

[@DaftRabbit09]

Honestly cannot believe I still haven't tried Star Citizen, looks great every time I see a clip from it recently.

[@hawkzulu5671]

There is a FreeFly event going on right now - i believe until the 7th. You can sign up, download it and kick the tires for free.

[@BaldVulture87]

Trust me it isn't. It has more bug than all bethesda releases combined and is still a tech demo that has yet to prove server meshing concept. 12+ years of alpha and still no release date in sight, estimates are another 10 years, and by then it wont look too good.

[@DaftRabbit09]

@@BaldVulture87 Well that sucks, honestly didn't realize it had been around that long. This week is full of disappointment- can't wait for those wishlisted games coming out in October

[@Kor-233]

​@@DaftRabbit09still playable though, and although it has bugs the innovations it has far outweigh the issues.

[@tres155]

​@DaftRabbit09 it has a lot of bugs but it's still very fun and has gotten much better than it was a few years ago, best space simulator and multicrew space game imo, I have put hundreds of hours in it and don't plan on stopping, game gets better every year as far as bugs and content go.

[@peter1308]

Star citizen is way better

[@shesaidshewaslvl18]

2 different experiences tbh

[@tj7094]

@@shesaidshewaslvl18one is lacking the experience while the other gives you the experience.

[@BGIANAKy]

@@shesaidshewaslvl18idk. 20 hours into starfield and I feel I’m in a loading screen and running simulator

[@shesaidshewaslvl18]

@@BGIANAKy sadly me too still a great game but I'm constantly in the menus

[@M3SA-gaming]

not even knocking either one.. im heavily invested in one, and my time has been invested heavily in the new one.. LOL But some people love both, myself included. One really caters to the sim aspect, and the other you can just grab a controller and get in and get out. Its great to have all the space games.

[@droid4d279]

As a Starfield fan they really need to fix the travel or make better cut scenes at least let us fly to surface and then cut scene

[@Munky84]

You can't do this with the Bethesda Engine.

[@Bigmellow_]

You a fan ?!

[@UmmerFarooq-wx4yo]

Star citizen fan: omg did you see the spacex starship launch, it landed by itself!!!

[@gelobledo]

Star citizen is more immersive. Starfield in the time it takes to leave atmo on SC, you can be at another planet doing a mission right away. SC is more immersive to me Starfield is more Just get to the action or task and skip all the other stuff. One of the things that would drive me crazy in Star Citizen was to spend 15 to 20 minutes flying somewhere, Blow up a guy with one missile and thats it. Yea immersive but at the same time boring as hell. And that with all the bugs, crashes, and 30ks I am more annoyed when trying to play. For now Starfield is a more enjoyable experience. Its not as immersive but game play wise to me its a lot better. If you bought Starfield or want to buy it thinking its going to be a space sim, don't bash it when you find out its not. Its a Bethesda game. Its like Oblivion, Skyrim, and Fallout. Its a RPG not a sim. And with Star Citizen its a Alpha build game. Its a Hardcore space sim Don't get into it and think its a arcade space shooter thats a finished product, then bash it when its too hard to play. I love both games and I hate when people try to compare them and crap on them for certain things just to get attention, views, likes, and agree with the echo chambers.

[@league1809]

Overall i just think currently No Mans Sky is superior in every way, its immersive by the means that you can freely leave the atmosphere without any cutscene, but also it takes less than 15 seconds with the ship boosters, and traveling to the other planets takes 20-1minute depending on the distance, overall its like minecraft while starfield is more like Skyrim.

[@gelobledo]

@league1809 yea of course Starfirld is like Skyrim and fallout because it's a new RPG universe by Bethesda. Its ment to be a RPG not a Space sim. I will agree though that No man's sky is a great game and does a lot good. But immersion I will have to go Star citizen and scale and ship battles Elite Dagerous. No man's sky is good for random structures and encourages exploration. Super fun

[@raytoni7013]

lol Simulation vs RPG- Sandbox. What good is free exploration to me if everything in Star Citizen is empty and has no mods, but you have to wait for the development to finish.

[@mskolnik2]

why the terrible editing? Star Citizen doesn't have cuts, but you edited in so many, what the hell

[@shesaidshewaslvl18]

i was super bugged out in the ship that's y its cut

[@patientmental875]

Because it takes 20 minutes to get out of the atmosphere then if you are lucky without it crashing or disconnects or 2 fps then maybe its enjoyable

[@mskolnik2]

@@patientmental875 By 20 you mean less than 2? And I think you may be confused about builds that are years old because stability isn't a big issue, and 2 fps... if you play on a 10 year old potato, that's your own fault.

[@patientmental875]

@@mskolnik2 Here come the apologists

[@Samson1]

Cutting from entering the ship to you sitting down implies the lack of a navigable ship interior.

[@larrymitchell6470]

It’s Fallout in Space, I always thought the comparison was hilarious. “Space ship!!! Collect item!! They are the same!!!!!”

[@rots3123]

star citizen = space sim mmo (focus on immersion and realism) starfield = space game rpg (focus on gameplay features and adventure)

[@tres155]

Until Sq42 comes out (whenever the hell that may be lmao )

[@AngloSaxophone]

Starfield is an arcade version of Star Citizen.

[@seveneternal7988]

not even. SF is a space themed game. Star Citizen is a space game.

[@user-pc7ef5sb6x]

No. No Man Sky is an arcade version of SC. Starfield is just a loading simulator

[@dwanrobinson]

​@user-pc7ef5sb6x or is SC a realistic version of nms. Hmm hmm see what I did there?

[@seveneternal7988]

@Unsanctioned_Buffoonery i hope you are doing hard drugs. in SC you can do EVERYTHING. Its a sandbox, in SF not even the basic combat works (which is the only thing it has in terms of gameplay. and feels bad and outdated AF.

[@joshhobson2340]

@@seveneternal7988have you played star citizen ? Because I have hundred of hours in it and I can most definitely say that you cannot do everything.

[@SLEAZY808]

It wasn’t declared as Fallout In Space. Todd Howard said that weeks before release to avoid legal ramifications.

[@user78405]

hope there is mod for starfield for flying in atmosphere will help with ton of frustration with landing misses and long walking and more landing misses due to surface scan don't help much in landing when its quicker to fly over atmosphere, also i just wish starfield get no more CO2 meter with mod , i rather run forever than pausing every 15 secs is waste of time for me

[@Sakisaka_Rei]

Didn't increase the speed limiter halfway through

[@patientmental875]

Be careful not to fall asleep trying to get out of the atmosphere

[@xOperator]

he didnt show it, but you can quantum travel (warp) once you get high enough (takes about 30 secs to get to altitude depending how fast your ship is), so that you dont have to slow boat it all the way to space

[@patientmental875]

@@xOperator Yes I know ive been playing for 7 years

[@sionkuden]

@@patientmental875 7 years, so do you recommend SC? Thinking about jumping in, it look like NMS on steroids. And I hate Elite Dangerous.....

[@patientmental875]

@@sionkudenStar Citizen is awesome but it gets old & frustrating real fast! After playing Starfield its going to be a very long time before I play Star Citizen again mainly because there isnt anything to do in SC! You spend the majority of the time just flying around hoping the game doesnt crash! The two games have a lot in common & I think Bethesda ripped off a lot from SC & does it 100x better & if I had to pick right now id pick SF

[@tres155]

​@@sionkudenIt depends starcitizen is like tarkov and flight simulator had a spacebaby so if you want to fly in a hyper simulated experience , run missions, loot and experience intense and challenging space battles then its for you. But if you are looking for a story and character development, plot, basebuilding, etc it's not for you, pretty much zero story elements. I love SC, SF, and NMS they all offer different things but have some overlap, so like I said SC leans heavy in to the Simulation aspect.

[@duphasdan]

Indeed. And the planets are to scale and not just procedurally generated sandboxes with copy and paste elements.

[@eyrebear]

If it took that long to take off in a game like starfield, no one would ever finish it 😂

[@angry40]

I'm combining two games in one: SF and Space Engine. When i have to warp from one star system to another i open SE and skrip the flight for 200 seconds from one planet to another

[@snowshoes5942]

It would have been more accurate if you would have included a 30k screen in the Star Citizen portion.

[@SkullyBones448]

We should’ve had the ability to at least fly ships on planet

[@worldofgames2000]

Starzitizen is a space sim and Starfield is a space rpg game... so is normal to be diferent..

[@HappyHands.]

So basically a 1 year old game VS a 10 year old game... OkayDoKey

[@hawkzulu5671]

Wait..which is which?

[@ryanloveless3870]

One is a Bethesda game set in space vs a space sim. Two different things.

[@MICROKNIGHT3000]

People want space game that actually makes you feel like space game, it doesn't need complex sim controls. But real time experience. Loading screen? Bored of seeing it in every space transition. Even NMS has better space feel.

[@MaxkillerV2Gaming]

@@MICROKNIGHT3000 Yet Starfield is not trying to be NMS or SC, Its a Bethesda game..... not sure why you was expecting NMS level of gameplay lol, that's what Bethesda games do. You fast Travel everywhere, it is also a RPG and not a open world sandbox, if you was expecting more than what we got then that's honestly on you. If you want space game then play NMS or SC enjoy flying around my guy.

[@MICROKNIGHT3000]

@@MaxkillerV2Gaming Nobody said that. People just have higher expectation stop trying find ways to hate on comments. People who are dissapointed by a few things in starfield either set their expectation wrong, had higher hopes or just a hater.

[@MaxkillerV2Gaming]

@@MICROKNIGHT3000 I'm not hating on no one, and you are right people really did have their expectations high because like I said it's a Bethesda game, I was also pointing out that Bethesda never said it was going to be like NMS or SC. People who got disappointed its on them for having those dumb high expectations.

[@MaxkillerV2Gaming]

@@MICROKNIGHT3000 And honestly in SF you are not really supposed to be flying to other planets on your own, the point of space in SF is for combat, looting, trading and stealing ships that's pretty much it. They showed this lol, they never showed them actually going to a planet atmosphere and landing on it they showed the opposite. Which was what I just explained and yet people was not paying attention or just plain stupid in my opinion.

[@MrSCOTTtheSCOT]

Apples and Oranges,, Star citizen is truly an open sand box but the money and time its swallowed making it the game it is from scratch is astounding ,i don't own it or play it again the time it looks to take to really get involved into it I couldn't give it and it deserves a lot of time given its scale and that's based against , that I own Elite dangerous, but no longer play it again just the time stuff takes , and is open sandbox all the way through for surface exploration in a buggy for planet surfaces to the "newish" Odyssey expansion and getting out there on foot based storylines and missions . Starfield is like a glorified star trek online with modern graphics mixed with Knights of the Old republic 1 & 2 where you'd watch the Ebon Hawk blast away to your next "mission planet" (old school CD /DVD rom games now on steam ) where you travel to a battle arena area on a planet to explore and do missions gather resources etc so I guess Fall Out x STO ( the space battles part) crossed with the KTOR idea ( The fall out series I haven't played them yet have them all time is a constraint but I did watch some Twitcher s playing it to get the idea ) After 20 Hours in Starfield there are many things missing , I feel a game of it cost and development time should have had to making engaging with it a lot smoother. The inventory is clunky , storing stuff is clunky , maybe i haven't worked out the best key mapping yet but the key mapping menus are clunky. Many control features aren't touched on in the intro game play which if your new to the series you may not be aware of if these things have carried over from previous games in the series but is Starfield a expansion of the Fallout series or a new universe. Maybe i need to read the instruction manual but i need to go find it so for pick up and play i have discovered some things by random, that knowing early may have changed a few early hours game play stuff. I would have thought after warping to a system, ok grav jump, you would be able to take your ship on an atmosphere to surface landing anywhere on a planet , but i guess that the engine is not capable and instead they just have a space instance, that why i compare it to Star Trek Online . But its a really enjoyable game so far , Now its down to Beth to come out with patches over time to touch stuff up maybe add stuff in and to the modders whom are many in the Bethesda arena , to bring the quality of life mods to the player base, and are due huge thanks for their endeavours for a brand new game.

[@Nitrox_909]

the one is 11 years in making the other 25...

[@raf_thomas4760]

Is there a mod that makes the starfield takeoff more like the star citizen that also adds the ability to freely fly around inside the atmosphere?

[@larrymitchell6470]

Do that in a Reclaimer now :)

[@joshygaminghub7428]

Starfield is a fast travel simulator

[@marioangel]

Now try a No Man's Sky vs Starfield vs Starcitizen exciting orbit

[@znajdesposob]

I'm very realistic and buggy. Please crowdfund meee. If you fund me enough, I promise to hire you to write positive comments about me. now seriously, if starfield had followed star citizen path, they would have to scam hundreds of millions $$ upfront and not release it in next 10 years because of amount of bugs and lack of any reasonable content. but it's easier to buy comments on gaming portals and youtube, than fixing bugs.

[@hawkzulu5671]

If StarField had followed SC's path they would have gone to work 10 years ago inventing the technology to allow their game to have a map, take off and land on planets without loading screens and cut scenes, and have the ground environments and space environments not limited to a skybox. Forget co - op ..the engine cant handle a single player in the world - with these assets , without loading screens

[@cybercereal-gg]

I'll take a loading screen anytime rather than climbing to the warp orbit with a slow ship for 10 minutes. Star Citizen maybe a nice looking game but there are no room for practic options which wastes your time.

[@chintoki]

You should add Mass Effect to this comparison as well.

[@Drendle87]

As buggy as Starfield is... it's still enjoyable. Star citizen just drives me crazy when on thing works one day and then just doesn't...I know it's a work in progress but it just doesn't impress me like it used to.

[@Byehk2047]

Why cant we just get a everything space game 😭

[@ImTheKingOfHyrule]

That's what Star Citizen is trying to be an that's why it will take over a decade and a billion dollars for it to be ready for prime time.

[@BaldVulture87]

Star citizen is a space sim, with no character levels, no skill tree and no storyline. Starfield is a RPG with all the previously stated mechanics. You're essentially comparing Arma 3 to Fallout 4... Use Logic people, set your expectations accordingly.

[@ravenwda007]

I think I bought SC back in 2012? Dunno. I’m not even sure my login will even work now since I lost the email account I used

[@0BLACKESTFUN0]

the one does you not have landing gameplay the other has landing gameplay but nothing else xD

[@bingbong586]

Its like too bad cig cant make their planet and flying tech into a actual game.

[@vanitas8271]

only if star Citizen was offline ..

[@ianwright5511]

Anyone who thinks star citizen is a more enjoyable game than star field has never played star citizen

[@baubachannel8998]

Star citizens is better because it's not limited explore space. Explore the Planet 100% better

[@ravenwda007]

There’s nothing on the planet and no loot

[@buddyblris3094]

putting too much effort so that it becomes a mess Vs putting bare minimum for cheap profits.

[@timeTegus]

Cool but one takes 20 and the other vorever😮

[@tylerbierman9948]

This is a super cool idea being able to hop in ur ship and fly to space like I’ve always wanted to do that in gta with a plane butttt that took forever bro so like what’s the point?

[@yoyoyo6677]

starfield no , is LOANDINGFIELD , is a loanding screen to all , open a door get in your ship loanding screen when '''take off '' when land and when get into a planet , everything is loanding field , cant take off cant land cant even explore no more than 2km from '''landing area ''' cant fly to another plater or even get closer , trash game disapointed .

[@yous2244]

You should've bought the Mustang Alpha it's literally much better

[@pacoflyer]

So why didn't you spool the Q drive and jump to the orbiting space station at the earliest chance? You don't have to take 10 min to get out...

[@lucas18314]

1000 planets

[@shivmom7903]

Starfield differnece build ship. Than this 😂

[@tobytoxd]

TikTok length for a TikTok brain ;)

[@shesaidshewaslvl18]

Yes sir

[@conradsutton]

50+ hours into SF and loving it. Fast travel is integral to the game when you reach higher levels, and having to crawl in-and-out of planetary atmospheres can be skipped. If you have to do this every time in SC, it sounds tedious.

[@ddha0000]

well, you also have your quantum drive which makes it quicker.

[@harrycammock6051]

can be skipped? you cant fly in and out of planets if you wanted to

[@Sharrayzen]

... Skipped? Oh, you mean the Loading Screen. :'D Starfield copium train is crazy.

[@foltax6625]

​@harrycammock6051 When using QT ("jumping") you can get to within 30-60 seconds of your target. No, you can't entirely skip landings, and I don't consider this a bad thing.

[@HeyretinCelik]

and this is why star citizen is way more superior.

[@Jay-ft3xh]

Try again?

[@gorganhorn6872]

1/10 size planets are super immersion breaking in Star Citizen. With planets that small how will they even create the Sol system? All planet sizes will be in complete error to their real world counterparts. Ironically in Starfield the loading screens make planets feel more massive and the very distant flat horizon on the maps feel right. In Star Citizen you just go up a few hundred meters and you can already see the horizon curve. Makes planets feel like golf balls in space. Mods for Starfield are incoming. They did upgrade the creation engine to 64 bit 😉

[@redship7532]

What you're saying is wrong, first all planets and moons have a scale of 1/3, which is already well enough, considering there are more than enough planets right now, you would need hundred of hours to discover and go throught them all. Then the data you gave about 1/10 is not even accurate it's 1/8 scale and it's for the distance in the infinite space that you can go without any loading screen unlike starfield. It's way more than enough, if you play star citizen the planets seems huge and way more insane than 5 poor procedurally generated schema for starfield

[@gorganhorn6872]

@@redship75321/3 your arse. Do a bit of research before you reply. Crusader is supposed to be bigger than Jupiter. It’s the size of Earth. Star Citizen is a boring hot mess. They are changing the flight model again btw. This is what the 6th flight model they are trying?!? They are just throwing stuff at the wall. Star Citizen is destined to become a massive flop because the game design is horrible. Starfield has vastly superior game systems and mechanics. Star Citizen you cant even customize your character. It is just an empty husk. It take forever to get to your mission in SC. Once you get there the quests have about as much depth as a patch one WoW fetch quest. Boring AF. Add a layer of griefers abusing the system killing players for laffs. What you’re left with is a game that will only cater to basement dwelling EvE refugees with retirement home FPS skills. We’re talking about a niche of a niche game. Star Citizen is destined to FLOP hard when it’s released. If it’s released lol

[@znajdesposob]

because star citizen is all about REALISM!!>!1111111oneone

[@HashWagon]

Landing gear!!!

[@KVIZZZZLE]

Star Citizen runs like CRAP !!!!

[@tommybull6578]

Prefer star citizen

[@dxd42]

Lets be honest, this extended departure of the ship out of planet is cool the first 5 times ... Then you will beg for an automatic faster thing. 😂😂😂

[@captainmurk3745]

Hum no.... It's always a pleasure to make the journey in atmo to find ourselves in space. You have to understand that Star Citizen is a slow game where you take your time. If you're in a hurry for anything and everything, this game is clearly not for you.

[@brandonerwin7031]

That's only because of how many bugs there are. It can get really frustrating if you have to wake up in bed.. have to take the 10 minute trip to the pad, get in your ship and leave atmosphere... only to get a bug or crash. Then you have to do it all over again. If SC were stable the vast majority of the time, it would be much less of an issue.

[@swaggydoggy2018]

Is that your only argument for validating the fast-travel feature in an exploration game?

[@MVH_Magnilson]

Knowing you can do it, its the fun. You don't have to do it all the time

[@tres155]

It depends on the person if you enjoy flight Sims like myself flying your ship out doesn't get old. Really wish it was a thing in starfield but I enjoy both games for different reasons.

[@4aw50fGold]

Glad we don’t have to do the climb through the atmosphere- No Man’s Sky is incredibly tedious in this as well. Even when boosting its a chore.

[@shesaidshewaslvl18]

yeah tbh for the game that starfield is i think if we had to continuously fly out of planets it would be a bit boring after awhile

[@4aw50fGold]

@@shesaidshewaslvl18 I don’t even want to calculate the time I’ve spent on lift off/Re-Entry and attempting to land in NMS. This is going to be a great time saver ^w^

[@olympusthedarkone83]

They significantly reduced the time it takes to exit atmos via Quantum Spool. Hit the Lagrange point in seconds

[@MVH_Magnilson]

Anxious competitive boys destroy realism in gaming

[@4aw50fGold]

@@MVH_Magnilson considering it takes 2 hours to and from to go anywhere in Texas… yes I wish I could fast travel without spending gas money.

[@joshhobson2340]

Why are people comparing these games ?? You may as well compare star citizen to animal crossing, that’s about how similar these games are. Starfield is not trying to be a space sim, how is nobody understanding this !

[@josereyes-go1pe]

Stay citizens is better 1000 time better 🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉

[@evobsm2328]

There is no comparison. Starfield is a clown game and there are cheaper and more fun + more detailed games that do way better than it. Comparing it to star citizen is a slap in the face. I wouldnt ever want to be compared to bethesda trash ever.

[@Jasonlopez-e5x]

As a star citizen player, i prefer starfield. Flying through atmo every single time gets old.

[@icedanilzation]

SC is more of an experience, where SF is a game.

[@shesaidshewaslvl18]

True

[@rickymartin4457]

Lol the denial. Because cutscene to cutscene is so exiting! I'd prefer actually flying through atmo and being able to land a 100 times over to whatever lazy ass stuff bethesda delievered. You can't even count that as actually being in space.

[@Fallentoast345]

​@@rickymartin4457it's even more boring to fly upwards for 10 minutes to get to space

[@rickymartin4457]

@@Fallentoast345 Haha don't try me, that's the average run time on a planet to a location of "interest" in Starfailed. Must suck to not even have land-vehicles just to run to a boring, empty cave. LMAO!

[@TheCommentFactory]

Starfield is such a lest down 😞

[@doorbell8132]

I don’t think the blatant scumminess from Star Citizen made its tech demo worth it, but man that is one impressive tech demo.

[@northman0077]

Starfield = loading simulator leftwingextremistwaistingtime.

[@lordf4667]

star citizen is full of bug and often unplayble...starfield not

[@shesaidshewaslvl18]

True its a pity tho that star Citizen is still a buggy mess

[@lachlantrescott5533]

LOL how do you say that Starfield is not full of bugs while the game is not even publicly available yet. Bethesda is known for bumpy releases, trust me dude.

[@patientmental875]

@@lachlantrescott5533 I havent ran into one bug in Starfield been playing for 30 hours

[@Sharrayzen]

Starfield is full of fun features that you'll experience the moment you start playing the game. I'm nearly 3 days in and uhhh... it's enough have brought me here to a Star Citizen video.

[@redship7532]

lol starfield suck dude