Exploring The Origins Of Humanity: A Complete Timeline of Human Evolution | Documentary

It's important to remember, yet often overlooked, that primates have come an incredibly long way over the course of prehistory. It has taken many convoluted steps, and trials and errors of evolution to get to where we are today. Our story can in fact, be traced back billions of years, to when the first single celled organisms drifted through the earliest oceans when life first evolved - but the story of the primates - the group of mammals that includes us - begins much later. This is that story - a tour spanning sixty five million years.
Through some of the most unlikely circumstances, our ancestors and relatives have survived. While many species of primate have been lost to the fossil record, they represent one of the most diverse groups of mammals alive today. With our own species included, there exists over three hundred distinct species of primate in the forests, grasslands, mountains, swamps and even cities in the modern day, all of which are monuments to the success of this order of mammals' epic story.
0:00 Intro
1:59 The Mesozoic: Living In The Shadows
5:19 The Paleocene: Dawn Of The Mammals
8:34 The Eocene: The Diversification Of The Ancestors
11:35 The Oliogcene: Familiar Faces Appear
19:35 The Miocene And The Pliocene: The Primates Take Over
27:57 The Plieistoscene: Our First Upright Steps
33:59 Outro: A Changed World
Music by CO.AG: / @co.agmusic
Thank you for watching.
DISCLAIMER: All materials in these videos are used for entertainment purposes and fall within the guidelines of fair use. No copyright infringement is intended. If you are, or represent the copyright owner of materials used in this video, and have an issue with the use of said material, PLEASE email us before putting in a claim and we can resolve the issue immediately. We can be reach on this email: [e-mail]
Copyright © 2023 Top5s All rights reserved.

[@lynndupree1205]

People who insist on a superstitious religious myth are ignorant. Science has no motive. Just a desire to learn.

[@jobckts682]

funny Fiction. modern Scientists have large imaginations. Too much Star Wars.

[@francorepici3586]

Superstitious religious myths? A poll was taken on the scariest experiences people have ever had and the majority said the ouija board. Try to rationalize that with science. Not everything can be measured in concrete. Some things only in the spiritual.

[@lynndupree1205]

@francorepici3586 In order to submit poll results to peer review, scientific methods must be followed. And repeated to insure consistent findings of fact.

[@francorepici3586]

Fair enough. National polls aside, when I was in high school, the assignment from the teacher was for students to write about their most frightening experience and as in the national poll the consensus was the ouija board. More to the point, actors, musicians, even politician's sell their souls to the devil in contracts signed in blood for fame and fortune. This is common knowledge. Now why would the people who run this world, who are alot more intelligent then you and me, give you millions of dollars for something that does not exist, your soul. Explain that scientifically. I am not trying to pick science and the spiritual over the other but to say that as far as human origins go they can validate each other.

[@francorepici3586]

Science can be faulted for forgetting that people are made not only of mind and body but also the spiritual. Science won't acknowledge what it can't see or measure like faith.

[@davidcraig1714]

This overview of human evolution is one of the best I've come across on YT. Props to the creator!

[@NPC-0013]

I lost my hands in Afghanistan so I actually used my toe to press play on this cool really super interesting video 👍😉

[@deeplover3359]

Cool story

[@imadilias7307]

🦶

[@iamfrickincool]

Very nice and informative! Cool ambient background tones

[@markmurphy5848]

Simply put - your videos are stunning and compelling. The monkey transfer to South America....... Just amazing. Keep up the great work. Btw - I almost never comment on videos.

[@YogiMcCaw]

The monkeys on a natural raft story is entirely a conjecture. The video states that it is unequivocally true. I'd like to see the physical proof of that, but of course, we'll never see it unless such a raft was somehow fossilized (highly unlikely) and found by us. Of course, this doesn't mean it did not happen, and it may be that there really aren't any other better explanations, given that the reality is that monkeys did somehow jump the ocean from Africa to South America. How else would they get there besides being cast adrift across the ocean? Nevertheless, I think it's important, from a science standpoint ,to be clear that just because an explanation is the most likely one given what we know, it is not the same as having proof. Therefore, even if it's very likely, it is still just a conjecture.

[@danmurray1143]

@YogiMcCaw I missed what year the monkey raft would have happened. Could South America & Africa have been much closer together at that time due to the plates having not completely shifted? That would at least remove some of the distance out of the equation. 1st time I've ever heard that theory.

[@executivesteps]

@@danmurray1143During the Oligocene Africa and South America would have been roughly 15% closer than they are now. The claim that they crossed in only “a few days” seems wrong.

[@danmurray1143]

@@executivesteps I think the winds below the equator blow east to west. If the gap of the ocean was 15% smaller, 30mps winds, enough natural fruit on the raft by accident... let's say the monkeys had just finished eating when they got stranded... I want so badly to believe that the monkeys pulled this off! 😫

[@executivesteps]

@@danmurray1143 The winds just below and just above the equator are easterlies. At about 35 north AND south latitudes the winds become westerlies. 30 mph is about top speed for a US Naval Destroyer. Do you imagine a bunch of floating palm tees and monkeys could match the speed of a destroyer at full speed and cross the Atlantic in a few days?

[@beatduck]

I was really looking forward to a video like this but yes, the music, especially in the middle is a little loud and anxiety causing. The narrators pitch and timing get a little monotonous. And there’s a weird thing with how the words in the sentences raise and lower that I can’t figure out. Doesn’t sound human.

[@DavidKahnSings]

seconded. the narration was painful

[@randomusername3873]

The fact that creationinsts are even a thing single handedly demolishes the "intelligent design" claim

[@edgein8632]

Dummy, I challenge you to tell me how a first cell was created, then I challenge you to tell me how a first simple cell built body parts to evolve. Not a single solitary evolutionist can because all science points to creation.

[@walkergarya]

@@edgein8632 No fool, there is NO science that points to your dogma of creation. The fact that we do not yet have a complete understanding of Abiogenesis is NOT an excuse to assert "god did it".

[@numbercode2486]

​@@walkergarya, Finally someone said it. Thank you

[@jaysmith6863]

How so? Explain.

[@michaelselz3389]

This always puts me to sleep, great asmr

[@krishnamohan1065]

A very enlightening video

[@MusicFandom]

"And this is where our story ends" Exactly.....

[@tokyworld]

Don't worry. Life will go on. If there is another intelligent lifeform, it will say. What in the BLUE FUCK were these guys thinking?

[@jonathaneffemey944]

Thanks so much for posting

[@mustafazouari4961]

Very good video but The repetitive sound is very annoying i cannot finish the video

[@ruthsparremberger399]

It eventually stops

[@yamil.343]

Guess some of us have evolved more than others 🤭

[@Penny-16]

Good video, but sometimes the music was too loud 18:43 , it overpowered your talking.

[@markfromct2]

Did you see the report of the research today? We almost went extinct

[@edludwig1337]

Great programs. Only problem, wish there were more

[@Joseph-fw6xx]

I don't see any intelligent design here just evolution by nature

[@0cene]

Good documentary. The music is somewhat to loud for me (and makes me a bit anxious)

[@marksullivan2230]

The music makes this almost unwatchable - BUT - I checked out the raft model for African primates travelling to Sth America and it appears to be the only theory that explains current fossil evidence. Fascinating! Thanks for that bit of info!

[@randomgamerdude98]

Music isn’t that bad. I could fall asleep to this video

[@remuslazar2033]

​@@randomgamerdude98i actually did 😂

[@holdenparker179]

I love this thumbnail picture for the video.

[@agathoklesmartinios8414]

You mixed up Therapsids and Synapsids, in the video it says that mammals evolved from Synapsids, which in turn are part of the larger group known as Therapsids. It is the other way around, the Therapsids are a group of animals within the Synapsids.

[@draneezemusthafaneurochats197]

😅ii😊ikibookuj😅 6:59 😅😅 6:59. Poll ion

[@ros3171]

And what sparedvthe spark that stared the spark that got it all started

[@robertarvanitis8852]

Good catch "Synapsids include all mammals, including extinct mammalian species. Synapsids also include therapsids, which were mammal-like reptiles from which mammals evolved. Sauropsids include reptiles and birds and can be further divided into anapsids and diapsids.Oct 31, 2023"

[@randomgamerdude98]

Yes i caught that too

[@democraticman3602]

I think there is a blind spot in your timeline from 40k to 10k BP (the Younger Dryas event) which we don't understand what happened because the most crucial evidence is drowned 120 metres below sea level. Academia just ignores it as it's impractical to go & explore, happy to accept their own version of events. It is vital we find out this ancient history & knowledge.

[@monicayriart3016]

No, my generalization was broader than that, and a comment on current western society. Why is a White Man always depicted as the conclusion of an evolutionary line to modern humans today, the only hominins alive. Do you think maybe, the technicalities cited are non-responsive ? Are we all white men around the globe? I don't think so, do you? I would love to see other kinds of evolutionary progressions: proto/hominids to modern humans. Something other that a White Man? And while I am at it Humankind is objectively more representative of us than Mankind. I thought we got over the white dudes as they representatives of our species // it's a diverse world, isn't it? . Thanks.

[@chopsyoutube]

you seem kind of racist and sexist to me...@@monicayriart3016

[@freybentos2602]

Isn’t that era where the Atlantis theory comes from?

[@democraticman3602]

@@freybentos2602 no, the Atlantis theory is not so old, about 2400 yrs old. But they didn't write their stories and legends in the paleolithic.

[@bernardm2528]

Where did we magic from, thin air? One day they will prove it, although already they know. DNA check it.

[@danmurray1143]

Kind of embarrassing in the year 2023, in the greatest nation, we've still got sky wizzard followers running around denying science & trying to argue the Earth is only 7,000 years old. That's sad; our education system is failing us.

[@galeocean4182]

agreed - people who believe in sky gods will believe anything, and are angry at people who don't go along.

[@thunderbee6]

embarrassing when nonexistent drone doesn't listen to the wind and healthactiveness You're at a unknown place, vortexs the number amount(vortex spheres) scattered throughout the universe with portals and powers, and that the human brain is a computer

[@user-mh6vx3cc7e]

what if i told you in certain country that believe have added in education system.

[@user-mh6vx3cc7e]

what if i told you in certain country that believe have added in education system.

[@jaysmith6863]

What science exactly is being denied can you give a specific example?

[@flyhouseoftruth470]

More detail on the Toba eruption a choke point where humanity was the most tested.

[@dgaryretherford6385]

Nice. The music is distracting.

[@TommyTester]

Omg. Change that irritating music. Awful.

[@noitalfed]

Music chosen and AI like narration not appreciated for this detailed and informative content.

[@scottperine9820]

What was the explosions name ???

[@numbercode2486]

The big bang is part of abiogensis, not evolution...

[@zeeba36]

Love the videos, except the music...

[@unitor699industries]

Music is too loud or annoying

[@raychernoff1135]

Homo sapiens lived in larger groups and had warriors with evolving weapons tech

[@charlypetra191]

BACKGROUND rumble .... in the beginning chased me away with a thumbs down....EQ on your voice has too much BASS....makes speakers Honk....

[@stevenfunderburg1623]

Spider sense tingling... Christian fundamentalists are becoming angry... crying imminent...😂🤣🤣😂

[@stevenfunderburg1623]

@upj2704 I don't think the changes for cognition are random. "The Great Leap Forward" as Gerald Diamond refers to it does seem to indicate some sort of hack or upgrade, compared to other biology around us. I will concede that. Though Diamond himself probably wouldn't. But what some or most may see as intervention from the Almighty might be intervention from elsewhere and not necessarily extra terrestrial in nature. This is why I was careful to add "fundamentalist". What about Terrence McKenna's work? Maybe psychoactive plants?

[@wannabetall2000]

​@upj2704 You just proved the point to be true in the most ridiculous way possible! Wow, just wow. 😂

[@Thor-Orion]

This effects you in what way?

[@jermsmason2082]

Uh oh, someone's upset everyone doesn't see the world the way they do. I can hear the stomping of little feet in a fit of pouting now.

[@Thor-Orion]

@upj2704 no. I’m referring to the initial comment. The one you didn’t make.

[@cowfrank]

The floating vegetation bring monkeys to south America is a stretch.

[@plopdoo339]

If monkeys got there why couldn't humans have gotten there by accident?😂😂

[@aarnaarn1904]

Thor Heyerdhal floated in the balsa raft 'Kon-Tiki- across the Pacific Ocean. Maybe the first humans across the Pacific became stranded on a massive jungle raft ripped away by a storm, and a few people survived utilising body muscle/fat reserves... all interesting theories concerning the translocation of animals without wings etc cheers 😀

[@Cat_Woods]

As opposed to what? Being magically brought into being by the word of an extremely hidden all-powerful entity and then 8 of that magical species put on a boat and still needing to be magically transported to the Americas?

[@rabidpichu7391]

Dude how did lemurs get from africa to madagascar? Fossil evidence shows their ancestors come from there. Its plausible, even if improbable.

[@mongoosevsgt]

@@Cat_Woods So the question remains, which species did you come from fish, reptiles, mammals, etc? And will you invite these species over for dinner?

[@charlenenarine7266]

The music really disturbed my concentration to listen to the video.

[@tberrardy]

The needless “music” made it unlistenable - too bad!

[@chriscarson1256]

The beeping noise drove me crazy, I had to quit watching the video…unfortunate too, I was enjoying it.

[@olgaramirez2822]

I tried! It's just so distracting and hard to ignore. Felt like it kept getting worse' more sounds.

[@kisho2679]

What could be the next evolution resulting from after Homo Sapiens? ... another humanoid species, or a new ....?

[@jamesreichardt7573]

Tell me if evolution is true , Why is it that only Mankind can speak and Build Great Cities and automobiles And Aircraft ? If evolution were true mankind should have some kind of competition ! The Fact is The Earth and The universe was Created Through Intelligent Design ! By Almighty God ! And it doesn’t take a Genius to figure it out ! But you have to want to know the Truth ! And Reading The King James Version of The Bible Is the First Step !

[@somethingclever2]

Ai

[@mattmatty4670]

​@@jamesreichardt7573no more magic dribble. Research Svante Paabo awarded The Nobel prize for DNA extraction from Neanderthal bones, that's NEANDERTHAL human species not us SAPIENS human species. Officially there is 3 DNA confirmed human species. SAPIENS, Neanderthal, Denisovans. Not adam and eve incest family. Fact check me please

[@THYAGURC1711]

​@@jamesreichardt7573If gods created everything why only humans worship why not other life's ??

[@kisho2679]

@@PhilipK635 well, nature has already extincted other homanoid species in the past (Homo Habilis, Homo Erecturs, Neanderthal, etc.). why should nature not exctinct also the last one remaining humanoid species - namely the current Homo Sapiens?

[@kellyatkins9064]

Great video, but the electronic music in the middle is too loud, makes it hard to hear the narration, and is distracting & annoying.

[@akirakuma0877]

the video could use proper subtitles, not everyone knows the spelling of all the terms you stated i had to make a reflection about this video but I struggled bcuz of the inaccurate captions

[@molars8976]

I couldn’t finish the video due to the annoying music

[@michaelmj1964]

I struggled with the lack of a real narrator.

[@jeb732008]

Literally came to post that exact thing. Why???

[@adelseth]

Thank you 🎉

[@johnholmesinchesahead2347]

You need to evolve.

[@laetitiavisagie-gg6kk]

Is it the music or the theory of evolution that bothers you ?

[@Ratcity69]

I feel weird commenting along with all the geniuses in here. However it doesn't take a high IQ to come to the conclusion that God didn't create the earth in 6 days. Thank this channel for giving me the ammunition of information to debate with my Bible believing relatives. I've studied that book backwards and forward and can't understand how some people buy it. This makes so much more sense. Thank you for sharing!!!

[@AMC2283]

You don’t need to refute what there’s no evidence for and don’t need to know jack about science to be an atheist, just a lack of superstition.

[@manicwhiteguy]

Yeh, seeing as time is relative 6 days doesn't really mean anything before there was anything 😂

[@7dc379]

So interesting, but the robotic voice and machine created music make this video unwatchable.

[@rickaguilar1833]

I believe that it is not a time line! But we were just living in parallel along with other hominids. And that in time we adapted and changed ala Darwinian theory of Evolution!

[@naterandolph7599]

I mean yea, I think homo erectus lived for almost 2 million years, until about 100k years ago, alongside homo sapien, homo naledi, neanderthals

[@EddieDrayton]

evidence? scientific papers that you've presented? / peer review acceptance of your hypothesis?

[@satanicmicrochipv5656]

​@@EddieDrayton This video is based on everything you asked for.

[@EddieDrayton]

wrong@@satanicmicrochipv5656

[@Algolxxxxxx]

I prefer descriptive names of species. Therefore we should officially name the monkeys at 2:00 as *Moustache Monkeys.*

[@bleepbloop404]

I saw your comment at about 1:30 and patiently waited until 2:00 to see what you were talking about and lmfaoo yes i agree. Mustache monkeys lolol

[@bernddalladas6159]

Why that stupid background noise, can't hear the comments properly

[@lisasmith7218]

Cant figure out why there is some kind of weird alarm going off in the background of this entire video, had to turn off after 5 minutes to find one that doesn't have a siren going off in the back ground for absolutely no reason at all

[@jeffmaehre7150]

There must have been a repost of the video. There's no siren no and the music isn't loud either.

[@DocReasonable]

*HUMAN GROUP EVOLVING TO BE AQUATIC HUNTERS* The Bajau people, or Sea Nomads, have engaged in breath-hold diving for thousands of years. Evolution has increased Bajau spleen size, providing an oxygen reservoir for diving, just like in other sea-going mammals like otters, seals and whales. They can stay underwater for 13 minutes, which is even longer than a dolphin can do it for! Most of us humans can only handle less than two. We would drown at 13. Oh yeah, and the Bajau people are also capable of seeing clearly underwater. They are able to make their pupils smaller and change their lens shape. Seals and dolphins have a similar adaptation. This has been proven in underwater visual testing, the Bajau see twice as well as other humans.

[@danmurray1143]

I should probably watch a video now on how dolphins sleep.

[@devxplayerdevelopment]

That’s amazing. Imagine what’s happening to us right now beneath the surface in regards to evolving with technology.

[@Lupop123]

Waste of time.

[@TeamTaylor1114]

Everyone is on here talking about AI generated narration on this video. I legit thought it was Judge Reinhold. 😂

[@thaddeusramos3543]

You hit it right! AI intended to fool the masses! AI can make the impossible -possible. Rats can evolve to snakes or bears evolve to monkeys courtesy of AI! And the scientific community will sell it to buffoons!

[@Lexi2019AURORA]

​@@thaddeusramos3543💯🤡🤡

[@evanpschneider]

Why does the audio to this documentary sound like a phone ringing?

[@user-xn2hf9re8r]

narrator sounds as if he's a simpleton

[@DevonClaireFlannery]

I think it’s AI-generated

[@olivierdastein2604]

Not AI generated. Simply a synthetic voice. There's no need for an AI to read a text. An AI would *create* the text.@@DevonClaireFlannery

[@DiscoGemini]

Takes a real leap of faith to believe this stuff😂😂😂😂

[@AMC2283]

That faith quip you guys use by the hundreds is no substitute for education

[@Solom0n2]

You mean like god?

[@DiscoGemini]

Well...not necessarily. But whether you believe that homo sapiens were created by an omnipotent being 6000 years ago, or that monkies from Africa survived a transatlantic voyage on a raft of vegetation, requires a huge amount of faith. Personally, the more I learn about evolution the more ridiculous it sounds. But I feel the same way about the biblical creation story also.@@Solom0n2

[@jakenbake9878]

@@Solom0n2Exactly like God. Neither one has definite proof. Personally I find the fine tuning argument to be the most compelling because it requires the least amount of faith. Thinking humans come from tadpoles is a massive leap of faith.

[@Solom0n2]

@@jakenbake9878 we legit have scientific evidence, are you saying biology and most majors sciences are wrong?

[@Provocateur193]

Sometimes the background noise or music is simply annoying in alot of these videos in general. If you have a nice voice, that’s all that is needed.

[@Rico-Suave_]

Watching 11:34

[@jamesb7529]

Every time a religious zealot comments on this video they get rightfully challenged and then they just run away LMFAO

[@edgein8632]

Run off by who? All I see are moron atheists that understand nothing about science

[@walkergarya]

@@edgein8632 No creatard, YOU do not understand anything about science. You have nothing but a god of the gaps argument that is worthless.

[@mkayhunt1]

The music must be tolerated in order to listen to the content. Otherwise, good.

[@xandretuber7030]

Sahelanthropus was the first proven walker, not Ardipitecus, this was way before at 7 million years ago, and also there is discussion on previous apes being the first hominid right about the ape exodus from europe at 10-9 million years ago.

[@texben123]

I know we started as a prehistoric worm, then fish, some type of reptile?, Then some type of cat creature that looks like a cat I’ve seen other videos of the origin of Man. Pretty much are ancestors of all from a lot of animals somewhere reptiles, somewhere cat like prehistoric creatures, and somewhere, even mice when the dinosaurs were around, then those mice evolved into monkeys in the monkeys, evolve into apes and apes evolved into us.

[@DiscoGemini]

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

[@wonderplanet343]

Music distracting. Nice info ❤😂.

[@ratha8799]

We didn't evolve from monkeys

[@texben123]

@@ratha8799 I hate to say this but you're incorrect our ancestors were monkeys, then evolved into Apes then us. When the dinosaurs were around our ancestors were rats well prehistoric rats then those rats evolved into monkeys. Pretty much both apes and monkeys are a relatives that's just how Evolution works most of our ancestors evolved from animals and technically were related to most animals. Pretty much most animals are distant very distant relatives technically all living creatures evolved from prehistoric fish.

[@ratha8799]

@@texben123 monkeys evolved from a common ancestor much further down the evolution line, we didn't evolve from monkeys but from a monkey LIKE species

[@rudolphschenker]

People evolved in different environments which is why people are so different. Pretty simple, self-evident concept but due to the magic of media propaganda, it's just not registering for many people..

[@herbertvonsauerkrautunterh2513]

Maybe Losing species is part of nature, just like everything we do.

[@markfromct2]

Read the news today about the study just released

[@herbertvonsauerkrautunterh2513]

I read that yesterday. Old news

[@maiteetchevarne5369]

Extinctions have always happened, so has evolution. But all this about climate change and global warming is happening so fast that animals are going extinct quicker than they should because they can't adapt to the rapid changes that are occuring on Earth. We're driving our way toward extinction and it's going to be our fault. The 6th mass extinction is starting and unless we do sth about it, thousands of species will go extinct and that might include us.

[@marjoriejohnson6535]

Sing songie reading with an up scale word at the end of each sentence drives me batty.

[@texben123]

Morganukadon what’s the prehistoric mouse I was talking about, then evolve into monkeys, then they evolved into apes then finally us. I mean we’re related to well rats and mice and other rodents. Apes are not the only ancestors. Some of our ancestors were prehistoric cats, some reptiles like they mentioned, and some. I was also a prehistoric cat , or feline probably related to cats as well. Will explain why humans and pet cats can get along so while. That’s why we find kittens. So adorable.😂😂😂😂🥰🥰🥰

[@DiscoGemini]

😂😂😂😂

[@tortveter3385]

In complete control of our invironment?????

[@bagheeracsgo2633]

AI generated narration?

[@olivierdastein2604]

Nope. Synthetic voice, I think.

[@JoeBamaSmokesCrack]

I saw a human outside my window.

[@petefluffy7420]

It must be very pleasing to think that you know better that everyone else. Before we can be sure that every step has been found, that no others will ever be found

[@AMC2283]

What species do you think is unknown yet absolutely crucial to the theory?

[@petefluffy7420]

@@AMC2283My point is, how sure sure are we that thus isn't? Just how many unknown species can you name? It sounds like an idiot's quiz doesn't it .

[@AMC2283]

@@petefluffy7420 is there enough evidence in the world to dissuade you of your religious objections, which have no evidence themselves?

[@petefluffy7420]

@@PhilipK635 yep, you got it

[@petefluffy7420]

@@PhilipK635 Completely and utterly missed my point. Jumped the gun me ol' mate.

[@winstonsmith935]

Presently in October 2023, mutual destruction is looking a good bet.

[@opietwoep1247]

What percentage of this video is absolute fact compared to speculation? Like at 16:54 is a proven event?

[@jonathancummings3807]

Yes. It's like this, human skin generates Vitamin D from the Sun. In temperate Northern climates where both the Sun is less powerful for about half the year, and clothing is necessary, evolving skin with less melanin is necessary for survival. Hence, "White" people evolved from darker skin toned populations.

[@dennisevans6544]

The content of this video seemed brilliant but I couldn’t stand the jangling noise, so irritating in the background. Who the hell was responsible for that ?!!! Couldn’t stay the distance due to this .

[@vesuvandoppelganger]

Humans were created by an unobservable genius.

[@walkergarya]

Nope.

[@AMC2283]

Why don’t you guys just say god?

[@galeocean4182]

why would a genius create something so messed up? Humans are one kind of proof there is no creator

[@surfsnow1371]

All praise be to Allah

[@raysalmon6566]

there is no such thing as human evolution Curiously, the problem is compounded by the fact that the earliest representatives of most of the major *invertebrate phyla* appear in the fossil record over a relatively short space of geological time, about 600 mya in the Cambrian era . The strata lain down over the hundreds of millions of years before the Cambrian era, which might have contained the connecting links between the major phyla, are almost completely empty of animal fossils. If transitional types between the major phyla eve r existed then it is in these pre Cambrian strata that their fossils should be found. **Michael Denton Evolution, A Theory in Crisis**

[@AMC2283]

Keep spamming till you believe what you’re saying

[@theresawilliams4296]

"There is no such thing as human evolution". What is your counter argument to the evolution theory and have you published your findings through peer reviewed process. And if not, what's stopping you. You could be a household name with your Nobel prize. I've seen your take on the banana that totally backfired and your mates crocoduck theory as well. Instead of saying it's false, do something about it and prove its false.

[@walkergarya]

The Theory of Evolution is NOT in crisis, it stands on a mountain of evidence and has been the foundation of all modern biology. All of creationism is intellectual fraud.

[@mikearmstrong8483]

​@@theresawilliams4296 The only proof he can provide against human evolution is the fact that he came from parents yet he posts stuff like that. So clearly he makes a good case for devolution.

[@chilidoghog]

The claim that there is no such thing as human evolution is countered by the overwhelming evidence from various scientific disciplines, including paleontology, genetics, and comparative anatomy. While the fossil record has its gaps, significant fossil finds, like those of hominins, provide crucial links in the evolutionary chain. Regarding the Cambrian explosion mentioned, it primarily applies to invertebrate phyla, not vertebrates like humans. The absence of certain transitional fossils in pre-Cambrian strata does not negate the extensive evidence supporting evolution in later periods. Evolutionary theory is built on a mosaic of evidence, including molecular biology, biogeography, and comparative anatomy, which collectively strengthen the case for the gradual development of species over time. Scientific consensus overwhelmingly supports the reality of human evolution, making it a robust and well-substantiated aspect of our understanding of biology.

[@TheStarflight41]

They don't have a feasible mechanism. It is wrong to teach common ancestry as fact.

[@AMC2283]

Keep spamming till you believe it

[@TheNoodlyAppendage]

Tired of text to voice voiceovers...

[@ReasonsForOurFaithMinistries]

I’ve got to say I’ve never encountered so many smart people in my life than in the evolutionist, chat, rooms and stuff. I hope somebody can answer this for me because I just can’t answer it and it’s hurting my belief in evolution. Can someone please help me here’s the question the termite cannot process or digest the wood pulp it eats but luckily, there’s a separate organism that lives inside the termite, and breaks the wood down to where the termite can process it. They CANNOT LIVE WITHOUT one another . It’s a fact I’m so confused now

[@ReasonsForOurFaithMinistries]

@@PhilipK635 I understand that but we can survive without those however it’s not that way with the termite. They can’t process the pulp with out it being broke down by the organism.

[@DenisK21]

Well, you *could* research it yourself from peer-reviewed articles such as "Evolution of Termite Symbiosis Informed by Transcriptome-Based Phylogenies" by Ales Bucek (Current Biology, Volume 29, Issue 21, 4 November 2019, Pages 3728-3734.e4) on websites such as ScienceDirect... ...or you could post passive-aggressive pretend questions on KZbin and pretend to actually care about the answer instead of already having decided everything you could hear about the subject is wrong because Jesus. Like you are currently doing.

[@ReasonsForOurFaithMinistries]

@@PhilipK635 I’m beyond that . The law of Biogenesis says life come from life . That’s unfair to jump all the way to that stage I guess

[@TheBardicDruid]

@@ReasonsForOurFaithMinistries That's true for Biogenesis, but Abiogenesis is the beginning of the structures necessary for life to begin.

[@ReasonsForOurFaithMinistries]

@@TheBardicDruid which has failed miserably with all these great minds we have and controlled laboratory conditions we come up with gunk and they want us to believe that happened by mistake O L the best day ever come up with amino acids . Whoa. I got a video clip I’ll post that just come out with today’s current prestigious. Scientist given their opinion on basic laws and principles of science and the Bible. It’s a 10 minute clip. I’ll post it they’re not going on 1859 they’re using today knowledge

[@user-kv2rz3mw2b]

We ain't got long.

[@diannetherien7137]

Can’t stand the noise of music

[@user-bj8js3mt3i]

So you mean they were human and not human now due to death or evolution.

[@Kemet3.0]

Whenever they don't start out with black African who is older ethic group. Once more, racism emerges, and I regret to inform you that if you fail to acknowledge the initial existence of black Africans as the first humans, then your statement is grossly inaccurate. Melanin is crucial for human survival, which is why the origin of humanity began with individuals possessing a darker complexion to adapt to the intensity of the sun.

[@user-xq4py3fq2y]

Well black Africans weren't the first humans, there were many before them

[@amandamatheny3675]

you don't have to use your thumb to press play on this video or even to hold your phone. I can do that using only my other four fingers.

[@sjason1377]

Common sense problem with this report published to deceive many. the use of proved in first sentence below. falsehood, its a false premise. this study compares DNA and language, concluding bio evolution shows the origin of language. the correct order is God, information, biology, man, instruction then language God exists with beginning "uncreated" and decided to create. He speaks informational command through His Spirit combined resulting in life Language was the first step which the information resulting in the order DNA would assemble by. Language again was used by God to instruct man. God is the origin of both instances. DNA is proof that language needed to exist first otherwise DNA is just 4 base acids of no intelligent order which delivers no useable instruction to assemble biology. If both DNA and man use language and also come from a mind and that mind isn't man's, than who wrote the instruction for DNA we only discovered now? The answer was provided clearly 2000 yrs ago in John Chapter 1 Nothing evolves and if evolution was correct it requires that life must exist for evolution to do anything and doesn't claim to produce life. So where did life start? why do scientist start at step 2 and never address step 1 where common sense belongs? Evolution starts somewhere after step 1 and providing only half measures, and claims purpose and planning are not required. Life is all a lucky mistake we benefit from. luck is as unscientict a principal if i ever heard one. And nothing worth doing is done without instruction like purpose and a plan. Also biology keep traits that are unused and not required. Many traits are art and only expressive. This speaks to survival only of the fittest. Just look at the platopus! Does evolution entertain humor? Or can nothing like evolution even conceive the thought required? If common sense is used Then God - a Person Almighty is the answer. The nonsense below comes from His enemy the devil trying to separate man from God and if you lack common sense satan we succeed at least in that case. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Professor of the Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University proved that it could be possible to describe genetic code and its evolution with the help of linguistic methods: its history is presented as semiosis, that is the origin of semiotic relations and the procedure of processing of linguistic information as communication. Previously the scientist described the genetic code as a semiotic system controlled by a set of rules (“grammar”), and this article continues his work. The results of the research, supported by the Russian Scientific Foundation's grant, are published in the leading semiotic magazine Semiotica. Newswise - From the very origin of genetics, scientists found a certain analogy between language and genetic information processing. Researchers began to compare the genome with texts also because the origin of the genetic code was an unsolved question in biology, as well as the origin of natural language in linguistics. Genetic code has a double nature: it performs not only biochemical but also informative functions that can be described as a system of signs, controlled by their position, linear order, and context. Thus, genes present a program for the development of the biological structure's embryo. This program reminds the linear text, which is written by specific rules and contains information about biochemical molecular structures and their functions.

[@CoolPeople1]

The earth is only about 7 thousand years old people

[@AMC2283]

Radiometric dating is a Nobel prize winning science. You need it to have been whipped up magically, no further back than written history to be special.

[@walkergarya]

Nope. The Earth is about 4.54 billion years old. Your fairy tales are not true.

[@danmurray1143]

LOL, Earth is so new, it still has it's "new car smell." But, we've found man-made monuments going back 12,000 years. And cave paintings going back 40,000 years. Dinosaurs going back many millions of years. Earth forming 4+ billion years ago. Universe starting 13.8 billion years ago. 7,000 years is just yesterday compared to 13.8 billion. You might need to rethink the sky wizzard explanation. That may not be your most reliable pathway to TRUTH. Actual evidence based truth, as opposed to hoped for truth.

[@thunderbee6]

embarrassing when nonexistent drone doesn't listen to the wind and healthactiveness You're at a unknown place, vortexs the number amount(vortex spheres) scattered throughout the universe with portals and powers, and that the human brain is a computer

[@mikearmstrong8483]

The problem with trying to prove that the earth is 7,000 years old is that you can't even agree what the age is with other uneducated idiots of your own faith.

[@El_LA_Lobo]

Eh idk, this seems to be a bit of a stretch.

[@AMC2283]

Aka you prefer your religious beliefs

[@kisho2679]

Why did humanoids not evolve everywhere where purgatorios had lived around the globe?

[@desiderata8811]

Humanoids are not a goal of evolution.

[@samreh6156]

There's such a thing as luck.

[@kisho2679]

@@samreh6156 ok, but thats not a very scientific argument ;-)

[@kisho2679]

@@PhilipK635 ok thank you. but how does this naming classification explain why homanoids did not evolve independently on several spots oround the globe?

[@jonathancummings3807]

Easy. Purgatorius was an anomaly, it was just a very ordinary, generic late Cretaceous Placental Mammal. A type that normally would have lasted maybe a million years or so and then either give rise to a specialist that was better at some minor niche the small Dinosaurs didn't occupy. However, the Mass Extinction event occurred and Placental Mamnal lineages that survived the horrific event, were able to evolve into new niches as the world recovered from the Asterioid impact event. Some populations were outcompeted or predated into extinction. In some places They lasted a very long time and became Plesadipiformes by 58 Mya. The competition became more intense, Purgatorius hadn't just existed in a bubble, it had relatives, they became RODENTS, and LAGOMORPHS. Squirrel type rodents evolved by the Eocene, and poof the North American Primates were doomed. In Eurasia some Primates evolved into Monkeys, then one type of Monkey evolved into Apes. East Asia became the domain of Orangutans and their relatives. Africa became the stronghold of Gorillas and Chimp type Great Apes. Humans are only possible with Gorilla/Chimpanzee lineage Apes it seems, this stage, and not the Orangutan type is the one that has the potential to generate Hominins. Humans are very strange, derived Great Apes, much less the lineage derived from Squrrellike Purgatorius. You need a Chimp relative that lived in trees and developed an odd bipedal way of walking on branches, this enabled them to walk bipedally on the ground, then they developed the ability to throw like a Baseball Pitcher, yes, an Australlpithecine living 3.6 Mya could throw like a Baseball Pitcher can.The "Australloithecine Revolution" I call it, the first Australopithecine, Anamensis 4.2 Mya was still about 40/60 living on trees/ground. By the time Africanus was probably evolving into genus Homo, fully terrestrial and well on it's way to us. Habilis, to Erectus, to eventually Sapiens.

[@Joe-ym6bw]

We could definitely do without the music it's annoying i can't watch this

[@user-bj8js3mt3i]

What fromed out of the mud? Man

[@scottfranco1962]

This would be better with a better narrator. He sounds uninterested in the material, and sounds like he's running an FM late night radio program.

[@SithStudy]

& eventually they would reach space. 2001 A Space Odyssey presents the best concept of the "missing link" for human cognition

[@texben123]

Pretty much all living creatures a evolved, from a single celled organism deep in the ocean where nothing existed yet except for Cells and eventually evolved into fish and those fish evolved into different animals, and those animals became every living creature and humans are sort of the final step of the evolution along with all the other animals.

[@thunderbee6]

embarrassing when nonexistent drone doesn't listen to the wind and healthactiveness You're at a unknown place, vortexs the number amount(vortex spheres) scattered throughout the universe with portals and powers, and that the human brain is a computer

[@texben123]

@@PhilipK635 When said one cell organism I don't just mean one pretty much is a one cell living thing that produce every living creature. What I mean by that it's a tiny cell that produce pretty much multiple life forms billions of years later.

[@texben123]

@@PhilipK635 that's exactly how it happened a single-celled organism billions of years ago of evolved into every living creature, it took billions of years for all living creatures to exist and it evolved from a single-celled organism. Our ancestors were fish and the fish evolved into different creatures that branched off one another producing pretty much every living creature which did happen. Well technically humans and animals are very distant cousins but we're all related is what I'm getting at. Cuz one of one ancestors was a my prehistoric cat, then evolved into our prehistoric Mouse, then it evolve into a monkey, been evolved into an ape and then evolved into humans. Because that's how Evolution works pretty much all living creatures evolved from the same ancestor which is a tiny microscopic life form with one cell which evolved into other creatures which took billions of years. An evolution has a habit of branching off from one species into another. Because most of our ancestors were animals that eventually evolved into Apes then we evolved into humans. That goes for every living creature. But also includes plants which is a bit surprising though I just assume they evolve differently.

[@texben123]

@@PhilipK635 then maybe we need to read a history book and go back to school. As I keep repeating a single cell organism and I mean a group of them not just one evolved into every living creature which scientists and teachers have taught other people. Because without that single cell organism we wouldn't exist. They taught this in school honestly you need to go back there.

[@texben123]

@@thunderbee6 I'm starting to think that some of you are not that bright I've explained this to you guys multiple times what I'm saying actually happened scientists have already proven this in documentaries and in books. The single celled organism I'm talking about there were groups of them that are microscopic after billions of years they evolved into other creatures which were animals and every living creature without this single celled organism we do not exist.

[@ashleyclements5549]

???

[@deanthiessen7306]

Amazing that people still believe the evolution line..the mind boggles.

[@AMC2283]

Some rational objection or just against your religious superstitions?

[@viper261984]

I found this unwatchable due to background music

[@ironmarc7881]

Flabbergasting how uneducated ppl are that they believe in one of the thousands of fictional deity’s. You can literally take a remedial science class and watch evolution in lab with all kinds of different species on earth. SMH

[@thaddeusramos3543]

You hit it right. A lot of "educated" buffoons can be fooled by AI. NO human(s) has ever witnessed any evolution of rats to snakes or rabbits to bears but AI can make things possible to fool the audience!

[@Lexi2019AURORA]

@@thaddeusramos3543

[@thaddeusramos3543]

@@Lexi2019AURORA Yes, a very Merry Christmas to you and sadly NO official holiday for poor Charles Darwin!🤣

[@Lexi2019AURORA]

​@@thaddeusramos3543 🤡

[@darthimmitis]

Is this an AI narrator?

[@amandamatheny3675]

The music during the Monkey section is incredibly annoying enough to make me turn this thing off.

[@beermerican]

The arrogance of these “scientists”, to even think they have any idea of how we got here, is absurd.

[@AMC2283]

aka evolution is against your religion

[@mikearmstrong8483]

They have proof based on the observable laws of nature. You, on the other hand, have jack shit for proof, except a book a home that was probably printed by Penguin Press within the last 30 years and yet claims to be the 2,000 year old writings of a being that no one can prove exists.

[@walkergarya]

No, it is your arrogance to assert that these scientists are wrong when you have no clue about the evidence.

[@mikearmstrong8483]

@@walkergarya Just realized that I replied to you when I meant to reply to original commenter, and I misinterpreted your comment. My apologies, and I deleted my comment.

[@olivierdastein2604]

And how much arrogance does it requires to dismiss people much more educated and knowledgeable than yourself?

[@basic_chain]

Is this an AI voice

[@user-zz4pt4js5v]

Interesting program ruined by silly music!

[@marcusvideo3533]

Is that a human

[@TSHEKHAN]

Interested, but stop watching after a few secs. cant stand the voice.

[@chocolatebar1100]

Who says the Bible and science can’t match up? I believe that science points to God’s existence. Genesis 1 is meant to be a poetic point of view to describe God as creator. It is by no means an account of how or how long God took to actually physically form things. Instead he is giving purpose to each thing He has created. He could have provided a process which we know as evolution. That does not deny the truth of the Bible. Ask God if He exists! Ask Him to reveal Himself to you. Ask Him if evolution exists. Ask Him about the book of Genesis. Don’t deny Him just because you haven’t asked Him the hard questions. Or been curious about the Bible or Christianity.

[@JaneJetsin]

Good thing you’re as smart as the dirt you think your god created you from, you can believe in invisible things and casting spells.

[@AMC2283]

you're certainly entitled to your beliefs that have zero evidence

[@phreespeech7768]

Yes, youre on the right track. Our creator, Jehovah, used the evolutionary process to create everything, including the life on this planet. To many thats a difficult concept to accept, especially for the Judeo-Christian faiths. But when you consider that in the realm of the Elohim, there is no concept on time. From God's perspective 4 Billion years passed in the snap of a finger. But He guided it and controlled it to where we evolved into the human that he considered worthy of his image. And they are the ones that succeeded. All the others werent good or suitable enough. Peter 2- 3:8 Says: "one day is with the Lord as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day." Which means that even an infinite passage of earth time is the same as a day to the Lord.

[@AMC2283]

@@phreespeech7768 nothing miraculous about that pal, shouldn’t it be more like those six days were a nanosecond to your god?