The feed system, the reciever, and the removable barrel and safety are actually really amazing.
@Gameprojordan5 жыл бұрын
my main gripe with it is the charging handle/pistol grip, never liked that idea, seems really awkward to cock under stress and not in a prone position
@richardkirka59775 жыл бұрын
The machine work is gorgeous.
@wierdalien15 жыл бұрын
@@Gameprojordan well yeah
@rannyczech5 жыл бұрын
czechnology again Ian? gosh you taught me more about guns from my homeland than any other museum. Thanks Mate!
@Lidoott5 жыл бұрын
Then you didnt visit the right museums :) JK, nothing beats Gun Jesus!
@hartman123495 жыл бұрын
je fakt ze vic jich je ve svete nez u nas , byl to vynikajici vyvozni artikl v ty dobe , ale VHU ma skoro vsechny varianty ve svejch sbirkach .
@rannyczech5 жыл бұрын
@@hartman12349 vhu je super. Čekám kdy bude hotová rekonstrukce a budu ho moct znovu navštívit. Naposled jsem v něm byl před mnoha lety a to jsem se o zbraně tolik nezajimal jako teď. :)
@hartman123495 жыл бұрын
@@rannyczech - no tak to si asi jeste pockame pri soucasnym stavu financovani , taky si rad udelam vylet a pokocham se spekama ktery jen tak nikde neuvidim .
@Lidoott5 жыл бұрын
@@hartman12349 Já měl tu kliku vidět vz. 26 na střelnici, a dokonce jako automat. Eargasm
@TheDeadfast5 жыл бұрын
For those wondering what the markings stand for: D = dávka = (unlimited) burst Z = zajištěno = made safe
@snakeplisskenrecords5 жыл бұрын
"Chceš říct, soudruhu kapitáne..?!" "No, dvě dávky" :))
@TotalRookie_LV5 жыл бұрын
Funny, in Russian "davka" (давка) means "a crush" or "a stampede", which in a way makes sense.
@Kumimono5 жыл бұрын
As one might say, "moar davka!" Er, dakka.
@thesloopjohnb5 жыл бұрын
This seems to be something that would be confusing with "Zastrelit" meaning "shoot."
@66MetalDevil65 жыл бұрын
@@thesloopjohnb Not really "Zastřelit" means to "shoot someone/something", "Za" is just prefix, if you remove it you get "Střelit" and that means "shoot"
@five51055 жыл бұрын
8:53 Yo dawg, we heard you like belts, so we made a *box* for belts that goes on your belt so you can have belts for your belt.
@tjbarke60865 жыл бұрын
Ah, the classics never go out of style.
@johnathanmcnabb20285 жыл бұрын
Haha I love it
@luisgimenez86605 жыл бұрын
100% more belt for belt.
@nettles895 жыл бұрын
Came here to say this.
@iivin42335 жыл бұрын
Can we have an unboxing of a box belt belt box?
@Enthymene4 жыл бұрын
This whole design is just slick as hell. When people call programmers like myself "engineers" I think of stuff like this and laugh.
@hughquigley53373 жыл бұрын
don't sell yourself short, dude! You guys do some pretty incredible stuff, much like how traditional engineers do they same. Only difference is that the former is not restricted by using solely physical objects/material, whereas the latter does have that limitation.
@lostinspace0135 жыл бұрын
I admire the Czechs for their military industry. A small country and yet they created so much really good weapons. Greetings from Poland.
@scimatarpictures5 жыл бұрын
Definitely! Same for the Belgians you could say
@CanalTremocos5 жыл бұрын
Funny how there isn't one German neighbor without an interesting weapons industry, even the small ones.
@lostinspace0135 жыл бұрын
@@CanalTremocos Well .... Poland has never had the opportunity to develop its war industry. It was unbelievably difficult because we are surrounded on both sides by more powerful neighbors who always wanted to destroy us. So we have waged war almost constantly, and war is not conducive to the development of the economy, no - when it is fought on your territory :(
@OslikusPrime5 жыл бұрын
@@CanalTremocos Well, I "wonder why" but German neighbours in general, had that feeling, that they better should "sharpen their knives" :)
@saiien24 жыл бұрын
@@CanalTremocos Well when you border with Germany you know that they are threat to you (or at least they were) so you know that you need an adequate equipment. You are a small country which can't compete with Germany's superior numbers so you need quality at least. This is why Czechs and Belgians make such good weapons.
@Scrambled_Meat5 жыл бұрын
I just left a museum in Prague with a few brens and zb26s so imagine my happy surprise to see this get uploaded 20 min later
@TheDeadfast5 жыл бұрын
You should return them - it's not very nice to steal from a museum!
@aaronclair44895 жыл бұрын
I'd be ok exiting through a gift shop like that.
@Surv1ve_Thrive5 жыл бұрын
Did you leave with all the Brens or leave a few for us?
@kubikkuratko1884 жыл бұрын
WTF?! PUT THEM BACK!!!
@Pcm9795 жыл бұрын
I always have time for Czech engineering! Fingers crossed for a Vz. 58 video some time.
@RaDeus875 жыл бұрын
IIRC it's one of his rainy-day guns, so we probably won't see a vz58 video unless shit hits the fan. It's easy for him to make a video about it since he owns one, so he's keeping it in reserve.
@weasle29045 жыл бұрын
@@RaDeus87 When he finally runs out of guns lmao
@bamboozlednoodle65134 жыл бұрын
Jesper O well, I think shit has hit the fan by now
@globalautobahn11324 жыл бұрын
Just came over from a link on that video that gun Jesus dropped this morning 👍👍
@derelictandtenderfoot15164 жыл бұрын
Wish granted buddy. Looks like shit hit the fan enough to make it
@reddevilparatrooper5 жыл бұрын
Damn! The Czech weapons designers were really crazy genius folks. No wonder I love their guns.
@chrismc4103 жыл бұрын
Outside Izmash now called Kalashnikov Concern, the Czechs by far made the best arms of the Soviet bloc. Crenva Zastava, the other CZ of then-Yugoslavia, now Serbia is a close second. Their AKs, Tokarevs, CZ-99 series, captured and new production Mauser K98K are great. Valmet of Finland on their heels helping to make the Israeli Galil is also good. What was East Germany's Makarov PM were/are second to none. FEG of Hungary was good too. They were good enough for Walther Gmbh to be official subcontractors, most notable product, the PPK/E and a 8mm Mauser version of the PSL still out there. The CZ-52, CZ-75 and CZ-82/83 really put them.on the map. Nothing wrong the Polish state arsenal or Norinco. They most certainly function and dead accurate but take them apart and compare to the others above and you'll see the difference workmanship wise. Any of them will arm you and protect you and yours well and sometimes cheaper than the AR series.
@manowartank87845 жыл бұрын
the bolt-magazine piece is the most complicated-simple-thing i've seen on this channel nothing better than functional properly machined piece of steel i love these disassembly explanations
@morelenmir5 жыл бұрын
The 'internal receiver' assembly must have been fiendishly hard to machine and put together, but they did it with style! Absolutely beautiful! The Czechs really do make some _excellent_ guns. I don't think they get enough recognition for that from the wider public.
@ShootAUT4 жыл бұрын
And I wondered until 10:33 why the top dust cover had to be that massive. 😁 Beautiful piece. I just love Czech guns that present lots of machined steel. It always seems like you could see how smooth they feel.
@Beeblzaphod4 жыл бұрын
Hello from Czech Republic. I have some experience shooting this gun when I was in the army (1986 - 1994). It was very precise and easy to operate gun. I had much better score firing this gun comparing to submachine gun Vz. 58. The only problem was taking care of the front bipod. It was foldable but if you forgot to fold it up before moving or running it was easy to loose it. I just remember one commanding officer screaming to my team mate half a day....
@STHawkST5 жыл бұрын
"vz" = "Vzor" which means "Type/Pattern". So technically it is "Type 52/57 LMG". If someone didn´t know. :)
@KIWI_DUDE.3 жыл бұрын
Kinda sounds like the English word "version"
@horstboellinger68805 жыл бұрын
The Czech got darn nice ideas in this time area! It's a slick system.
@ristoalanko92815 жыл бұрын
The Finnish KvKK62 was originally intended for magazine and belt use, several versions were tested, but the final prototypes were belt only.
@criffermaclennan5 жыл бұрын
What a beautiful piece of engineering
@Doppeldropper5 жыл бұрын
Finns, I think it was Aimo Lahti, actually designed push through steel belt during WW2 in -42/-43 for the Finnish MG-42 to be used with 7,62x53R/54R ammunition.
@hanfpeter28224 жыл бұрын
I think it actually was his Brother,dont know the Name sadly
@SinaelDOverom5 жыл бұрын
Those controls on the handle have really neat arrangement IMO. Non-foldable carry handle is weird.
@TheArchaos5 жыл бұрын
@ian miller I don't see a reason why a folding handle wouldn't work.
@SangTheCryptek5 жыл бұрын
@@TheArchaos Could've been seen as "one more thing to break". If the handle doesn't need to fold out of the way, why not make it fixed and thus more sturdy?
@TheArchaos5 жыл бұрын
@@SangTheCryptek With the sheer amount of mechanical complexity, I don't see a reason why a folding side would change much.
@chrisebz64735 жыл бұрын
Probably as simple as someone on the design team thinking a folding/rotating handle for the barrel wasn't necessary and that just welding it to the jacket would suffice.
@Wetcorps5 жыл бұрын
Well the sights have to be offset anyway so why bother :)
@Hegataro5 жыл бұрын
As a czechman, I always make time to watch one of your videos about our guns, Ian
@Atzy5 жыл бұрын
The second position on the lid of the belt box is not really to seal it. When you fill a box you leave the "first" link and round sticking out of the gap and shut the lid over it so it's held in place. That way when loading you only need to grab the exposed link, pop the lid open to the first position and load, instead of opening the lid fully and fishing around to find the end of the belt
@FayazAhmad-yl6spFZ5 жыл бұрын
Genius design,by a small nation but advance in science and technology.
@TheArklyte4 жыл бұрын
The "intermediate" 7.62x45mm round has same velocity, bullet weight and muzzle energy as "rifle" 6.5x50mm Arisaka. Which just helps to complicate the "first ever assault rifle" debate as Fedorov used the latter.
@steelyemry96123 жыл бұрын
What an absolutely beautiful piece of history and art! love it!
@pedrotheswift59375 жыл бұрын
Someone loves that gun,, its in great condition...
@PMGF5 жыл бұрын
I get a little excited when I see a beautifully engineered piece of machine work, that disassembly was so nice to watch.
@randywatson83475 жыл бұрын
After watching the videos, I started to love the toploading design. I really like the simplicity and functional design, simply genious. The solid chunks of parts is damn sexy.
@ЛедовскихЕвгений-э6п3 жыл бұрын
Czechoslovakian weapon means quality! And mechanical beauty! Thanks to Ian! Really rare, really cool!
@Tunkkis5 жыл бұрын
I was waiting for you to mention the KvKK, and you didn't disappoint. Very interesting video once again.
@mtodd47235 жыл бұрын
The Czechs do weapons well . Thanks for posting this video , Great job !
@martinokenka90635 жыл бұрын
Hi, Ian. Let me just note that the milled internal receiver is non-functionally recoiling against buffer in the stamped outer receiver (similarily -of course - to the Bren) and smoothing the shooting a bit. That is the main reason for this two-part receiver conception. This non-functional recoiling is a fascinating aspect of Václav Holek designs, BUT the vz. 52/57 actually is work of Jaroslav Myslík, who adopted the vz. 52 to 7,62*39 after Holeks death in 1954. The machineguns vz. 52/57 did not see much use similarily to the rifles. Just after the asault rifle vz. 58 replaced the rifle vz. 52/57 (in 1959), universal machinegun vz. 59 replaced the light machineguns vz. 52/57 (in 1963). Great as always, thanks!
@ajr50865 жыл бұрын
This is like the missing link for the ZB 26 family and the UK VZ 59. It has all the features of the 59, but still is very much in the 26 style. (gun) EVOLUTION CONFIRMED!!
@starlingcz3 жыл бұрын
This is mixed feautures and design of ZB-26 (ZB-30J) and ZB-53.
@brunoratto2535 жыл бұрын
Aww! It's like a baby Bren! XP Just kidding, it looks awesome. Wish you could take it to the range to see it in action.
@chrismc4103 жыл бұрын
They helped develop the Bren in the first place
@Delistd4 жыл бұрын
Another fascinating Czech machine that spits metal. The Czechs are fantastic engineers.
@Mrgunsngear4 жыл бұрын
Very cool
@Getpojke5 жыл бұрын
The Czechoslovakians make some beautiful guns and this is a beauty. Even for folks who don't like guns (weird folk) they've got to admire how that beauty in the video is but together; from an aesthetic and engineering point of view. I was lucky enough to have a go on the British BREN before we got rid of it, and what a joy it was to shoot. It was like poetry in cyclic motion. Just ran like a sewing machine. Thanks for the great video Ian, hope you get a chance to have a little range time with it, and of course I'm sure we'd all love to see a video of that.
@albundy26965 жыл бұрын
Goat Boy Bren is not Britisch, the Briten and Australiens have make it in Lizenz..
@Getpojke5 жыл бұрын
@@albundy2696 British adaptation of a Czech light machine gun. Its name originated as an acronym from Brno, where the Czech gun was made, and Enfield; in the outer borough of London, England,, where the British adaptation was made. John Inglis and Company, Canada: A contract was signed with the British and Canadian governments in March 1938 to supply 5,000 BREN machine guns to Great Britain and 7,000 BREN machine guns to Canada. Both countries shared the capital costs of bringing in this new production facility. Production started in 1940, and by 1943 Inglis was producing 60% of the world output of BREN machine guns. Lithgow Small Arms Factory, in Australia was responsible for supplying the Australian army. But certainly most of the design work was by the Czechoslovak Brno arms factory and I admire greatly the work they did.
@spacemanmoe56225 жыл бұрын
Intricate mechanical work of art! Thank you Ian.
@matejmatej35545 жыл бұрын
You give us the best presentation of a gun when ever i have a question seconds later you provide the answer 😉😁 HOW DO YOU DO IT ??? Much love and respect form sLOVEnia stay awesome and thanks for your hard work
@PorkusMaximii4 жыл бұрын
Very slick design. The machining is done quite well.
@alimanski79415 жыл бұрын
Can easily see the Negev's feed system lineage in this LMG, as you mentioned in the Negev video.
@Teguvas5 жыл бұрын
That has some really great pieces of engineering incorperated in it
@bfrazer41264 жыл бұрын
What's amazing to me is someone designed that whole bolt/receiver assembly without a CAD program to see a 3D model before machining the parts... really cool.
@ronaldjohnson1474 Жыл бұрын
Remember, this is a collection of previous ideas augmented by new ones. Still, I think the designers had many sleepless nights.
@thelastjohnwayne4 жыл бұрын
Just when I thought I had seen every thing in firearms designs Ian shows me something else.
@TitanV4 жыл бұрын
1:10 ...Gun Jesus in not impressed with 7.62x45... Anyway, this weapon is truly impressive. It seems to be over engineered, when in fact, it is so well thought through in every single aspect and detail that it's simply astonishing.
@TJWDawg5 жыл бұрын
I loves me some Czechnology.
@alphazombieelite3 жыл бұрын
"Both confusingly named the VZ52" *Laughs in M1*
@stuka974 жыл бұрын
Along with a bunch of other machine gun parts I got years ago ,was a complete bolt for A Vz52/57 took me awhile to identify what it was.
@ozdavemcgee20794 жыл бұрын
I had a VZ 52 and VZ 52/57 back in late 80s. I shot them and a SKS on a coastal rifle range. 7.62 x 39 could get knocked off target in high winds at 200m. So did the 7.62 x 45. That being said, there was a fair bit of ammo back then, and it was better in higher winds. I always thought it would have been a better choice if we really had to hhave 7.62. More than AK less than HK and FN, it would have been a pleasant calibre to use full auto
@jimvandemoter69615 жыл бұрын
Ian, another great video. I really like how you explain the workings of these guns. You make it easy to understand.
@baronobeefdipyes51815 жыл бұрын
Kinda awesome to see that while watching this you can tell that the VZ59 took some inspiration from this gun beyond the pistol grip charging handle. The lever for charging looks almost exactly the same, the bolt carriers look very similar, the tripod mounts look similar, and the way the barrel is removed is pretty similar as well.
@McDylanNuggets5 жыл бұрын
You said I haven't shot this YET. then mentioned 1000+ rpm. Soooo I'm excited for tomorrow's shooting video!
@Jesses0015 жыл бұрын
That safety latch not letting you insert a magazine when the barrel is not locked also ensures that the barrel can not walk out of lock when a magazine is inserted. Shooting from a magazine with the cover open as it must be could cause the barrel to be knocked out of lock during firing.
@iLLeag7e5 жыл бұрын
I think I like seeing LMG's get fully disassembled more than any other firearm. It's always cool to see the precise engineering that goes into crafting all those little critical bits & watching how it all fits together like a puzzle. The parts are always chunks of metal, not sheet metal but tooled steel. I love this channel. Thanks Ian!
@cptreech4 жыл бұрын
What a beautifully machined piece of kit.
@wernesgruder14 жыл бұрын
Biafra purchased some of these for use in the Nigerian Civil War of 1968. Czechoslovakia was one of the few countries who would sell to Biafra
@c.j.10894 жыл бұрын
This is mechanical engineer porn. This design is extremely impressive. The simplicity, multi-function design is something engineers aspire to achieve. My guess is this was designed by several talented engineers over a long development period.
@samuelbean99285 жыл бұрын
You gotta hand it to the Czechs,they can damn sure build a fine weapon,and some good milsurp clothing
@matthayward78895 жыл бұрын
I’ve been mildly obsessed about the vz52 ever since I read about it, years ago. A genuine treat to see it here on FW! Thanks Ian 👍
@86abaile5 жыл бұрын
I like it. I like all the clever little design features on it.
@java90905 жыл бұрын
All I see is long hours of machining time. Gotta give it to the Czechs they know their way around a tool shop.
@Sseltraeh895 жыл бұрын
some of the machining on early 20th century military guns from Brno is ridiculous. This is mostly just design which sacrifices manufacturing cost for quality, but the ZB53/TK vz. 37's infantry barrel (the one with cooling ribs, unlike the smooth heavy one found on vehicle/fortification version or british BESA guns), that's just ridiculous level of machining porn.
@junkersintutus42825 жыл бұрын
Yeah, not anywhere as efficient as stampings but some pretty impressive design and machining.
@junkersintutus42825 жыл бұрын
I mean there obviously are some stamped parts, but there's a lot of fine machining.
@deadflowers70174 жыл бұрын
Yes, there's enough metal in this LMG for 20 glocks.
@Hesric3 жыл бұрын
Gotta be honest this may be one of the cleanest disassemblies I have ever seen.
@stalhandske96492 жыл бұрын
I never knew KvKK was based on this Czech piece. It has somewhat ill reputation among Finnish reservists due to certain reliability issues and is often compared with disfavour to PKM (which FDF also employs.) An unfair comparison perhaps. The original it is copied of, however, seems like a very neat and functioning gun!
@alexsis17784 жыл бұрын
Feel like worst case scenario, that barrel would make a great baton!
@loupiscanis94495 жыл бұрын
Thank you , Ian .
@alwaystinkering77105 жыл бұрын
That's a really nice design. They were obsessive about keep dirt out. It's so simple to operate and take down but looks like it was a lot of work to machine.
@Pyrochemik0074 жыл бұрын
Czech engineering focuses on effectivity. No unnecessary trinkets, no decorations.
@DennyAJD5 жыл бұрын
Finaly! Thank you Ian 😃
@RicTic664 жыл бұрын
Superb Czech engineering, no wonder the BREN remained in service with the British Army for so long. When put up against the BAR it's no contest.
@chrismc4103 жыл бұрын
Until FN finally made one with a detachable barrel for the BAR. Germany won the GPMG race with MG-42, still in use today as the MG-3 in 7.62 NATO.
@ninaakari51815 жыл бұрын
That disassembly reminds me on how kvkk disassembles
@williamdong45895 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the Czech engineering, ZB26 was the most popular machine gun in China in WWII.
@yaboosnubs4 жыл бұрын
Czech magic
@kenhelmers26035 жыл бұрын
Pretty darn slick. Thanks Ian!
@veineephoon15105 жыл бұрын
A few VZ52 made it into Australia . Mines still 7.62x45 cal . Ammo is very hard to find . I imported 1000 rounds from the USA a few years ago.
@XanderTuron5 жыл бұрын
Man, I can't wait to Czech out this fine piece of Czechnology!
@asmodeus04547 ай бұрын
The 7.62mm Vz-52 and Vz-52/57 light machine-guns had a high cyclic rate of fire, 900 r.p.m. with box magazine and 1100 r.p.m. with non-disintegrating link belt, and they lay down a very high volume of fire.
@Swindle19845 жыл бұрын
North Korea is still issuing the Type 73 machine gun in 7.62x54r, which is another derivative for the ZB26/Bren design, able to switch between using PKM belts or proprietary 30-round magazines. And as the name implies, it was developed and adopted in the early 70's, so the Vz 52/57 isn't the last gasp of the ZB26 design.
@Enthymene4 жыл бұрын
8:25 "So, it's hard to do a push-through belt with a rimmed cartridge, although the Czechs did pull that off..." I think you mean they pushed it through ^o^
@nelson1tom4 жыл бұрын
Is it just me or do the Czech’s seem to design features for much stronger fingers?
@Pyrochemik0074 жыл бұрын
Do not tell your girlfriend.
@jerryjohnsonii41815 жыл бұрын
Love me some Czech VZ Firearms
@Landsharkitis5 жыл бұрын
I watch all your ads fully we love forgotten weapons
@tafino5 жыл бұрын
The Bren is one of my all time wants, until learning of its Czech cousins !!!
@chrishill37855 жыл бұрын
But the bren is Czech anyway
@thetrippedup93225 жыл бұрын
Bren is the combined efforts of British and Czech gun smiths, so they're step brothers?
@hanadrncova57124 жыл бұрын
@@thetrippedup9322 Not really.. Bren is VZ 26 but in british lisence.. Vz 26 is father of Bren and Japanese Types
@billsmith51665 жыл бұрын
Thanks Ian, really interesting weapon.
@edwalmsley14015 жыл бұрын
I cant imagine the amount of machine hours that went into that removable breach assembly,a development to far I think
@cracklingvoice5 жыл бұрын
It is a system that could, in theory, make caliber swaps very simple. Pull the 'inner receiver' out, drop in a different type, add a barrel of the correct size, and the rest just goes on. Hell, the changing handle for the barrel is the magazine cover for the 'inner receiver', so they would be shipped as a matched set anyway.
@duncanmcgee135 жыл бұрын
That insternal assembly is an absolute unit
@ladam8365 жыл бұрын
The machining of that bolt assembly group is just.. Wow
@jasonalmendra38235 жыл бұрын
The Czechs make great guns & great uhh...visual arts.
@1683clifton5 жыл бұрын
look at all those cuts,even if the thing was the jammaster 5000 id love to be an apprentice in that shop!
@cosmicatrophy46485 жыл бұрын
10:38 How did Ian know I was there?!
@robbusheay42584 жыл бұрын
love my VZ 58.........beautiful weapon
@brucerobert2275 жыл бұрын
@4:50 I wonder how many troops released the pistol grip for charging when trying to release the safety?
@DrataTheDrifter5 жыл бұрын
Negligent discharges happened sometimes with this pistol grip/charging handle thing (my state donated experience is with Uk vz. 59, which has the same weird grip/handle/release/safety thing)
@Apfsds1205 жыл бұрын
When stationary , you can have handle in front position: grab the gun pull back handle, shoot. The same with UGL vz. 59. And you cannot mistake handle release with safety anyway. Totally different feeling on thumb.
@Zbyhonj5 жыл бұрын
My dad told me a story about a People's Militias officer who was trialed for shooting and heavily wounding someone during drills, because he messed up the manual of arms while reloadind this gun. (From what I've heard, militia drills used to be a complete joke and that guy was apparently drunk out of his mind)
@likydsplit84834 жыл бұрын
Somewhere in file cabinet is the original schematic - with a hand written note from a Czech machinist that reads; “Are you freak’n kidding me?”
@ph58325 жыл бұрын
Thanks Ian .. always enjoy over a cup of coffee
@codyweaver7065 жыл бұрын
The magazine feeding downward in a gravity-assisted direction should help it feed faster, which should make it more accommodating to the higher cyclic rate of firing without a belt in place.
@kineticdeath4 жыл бұрын
for such an old gun that one looks really really great condition wise. But i am no where near the expertise level of Ian!
@sumvs59924 жыл бұрын
Finally! The true origin of "I like the look of the starting weapon, so I'll upgrade it all the way"
@starlingcz2 жыл бұрын
Magazine is from LMG vz. 52 (7.62x45), For vz. 52/57 was not created magazine for 7.62x39 and was used only belt. There are some vz. 52 magazines for blank ammo which have dents for shorter blank 7.62x45 and many people thinks it's 7.62x39 magazine, but they have feed problems. Adoption for 7.62x39 was just for short period of time due to new UK vz. 59 and Ministry of defence chose to just adapt belt. Machine guns should be sold to other countries and so Foreign trade company (PZO) was commissioned to develop new 7.62c39 magazines, but it was canceled and sold only with new belts.
@oldhoonta5 жыл бұрын
I hope you'll get your hands on Beretta 93R someday.
@PosranaRegistrace5 жыл бұрын
Two of them... ;)
@savinsebastian20252 ай бұрын
MASTERPIECE.
@Agent00abe5 жыл бұрын
This was a quite interesting gun to have a look at.
@hughquigley53373 жыл бұрын
Ok so y'know how people in movies and stuff rack the slide of their shotgun to look tough or whatever? Imagine doing that, but with the grip of your machine gun. Pretty damn cool, if you ask me.
@combatmaiden5 жыл бұрын
The countries behind the iron curtain were not soviet influenced, they were soviet controlled.