Russia's New Stealth Bomber - the Invisible PAK-DA

[@FoundAndExplained]

Visit brilliant.org/foundandexplained/ to get started learning STEM for free, and the first 200 people will get 20% off their annual premium subscription.

[@เจริญงอกงาม]

If that Actor of Ukraine Zelensky would have surrendered to Russia all of this would have been over a long time ago. 🇷🇺🌟🇷🇺 RUSSIA IS GREAT**GLORY TO RUSSIA**GOD GIVE RUSSIA VICTORY. 🇷🇺🌟🇷🇺

[@leoniegureghian4015]

Allways, Amen 🙏

[@shootingsportstransparency7461]

Same quality as the T-14 Armata tank that only exists as a cardboard mockup and between the ears of some Russian leaders 🤣🤣

[@cesiumion]

@8:12 Displayed the correct map of India. thank you

[@AsinineComment]

2:20 - "It can be a little bit hard to _dis-kern_ between fact and..." Nah, I wouldn't have bothered to check the bot narration, before uploading it to trawl for 'likes', either. 😑

[@gruxtertv6005]

I am stunned by the visual quality. It's honestly incredible how far you've come. Keep it up!

[@akborealisdevstringerdesig3845]

You believe everything you see?

[@gregc9344]

@@akborealisdevstringerdesig3845 You did not understand the comment

[@terencefield3204]

cretin

[@ceoofswag6348]

Reminds me of Mustard.

[@FoundAndExplained]

@@akborealisdevstringerdesig3845 i believe

[@Aitelly]

Saw you In the Podcast in Creators and Founders. We (2 of Us )Started A 3d Animation Channel (Blender) inspired by your Work and Dedication.Really in Awe At your Work . All the The Best to the 1 Million Subscriber mark.

[@FoundAndExplained]

Send me an email and we can set up a call to talk about your video/youtube journey :) love to help new creators!

[@Aitelly]

@@FoundAndExplained Will Definitely Do Thank You For the Reply. Means a lot : )

[@deel152]

Xeha lijia why are you spamming this channel with your content??? Should not be on this channel.

[@hchand02]

@@FoundAndExplained I would too like to talk about the models or animation used in your videos

[@Aeyo]

@@Aitelly Looked at your channel, it's very impressive.

[@MrGrandure]

At 3:40, i saw the turbine blade through the cockpit. The fact that you even modeled an internal component like that is one of the reasons why subscribe... keep it up!!!

[@thatgreenneko]

I don’t think you would be able to see straight through the plane irl... so I’d say it’s an error

[@techkingdata9338]

@@thatgreenneko could you imagine

[@seemovielove3597]

It is an internal turbo propeller engine to cool it down

[@haberdasherrykr8886]

Does he himself create the render or does he outsource it to someone named Andrey something

[@chiefkeefgaming2005]

@@haberdasherrykr8886 he said in a q and a that he learnt blender to model planes since the videos he wanted to make about experimental planes would have enough footage

[@madbadger6255]

It also has MASSIVE exhausts directly from the rear, no masking, shielding or anything. An infra red stealth stop sign.

[@analtubegut66]

Right?! Lol

[@pjm760]

You definitely know more than the engineers

[@mylessockin3866]

Get rid of Putin real simple trouble with a Capitol T

[@AleksAleksov454]

Самая большая неэкранированная труба у тебя в штананах берегись черной головки с самоноведением)))

[@moist_ointment]

@@pjm760 You don't need to be a pilot to know that helicopters don't belong in trees. Compare those engine outlets to a B21 or B2. Russia constantly lies about the capabilities of some future wonderweapon. I trust US engineers who have actually built stealth aircraft

[@johnb8319]

At this point, it is so invisible even russians cant find where it is parked.

[@thinleyjamtsho9977]

😭😭😭

[@giglo5809]

Savage😂

[@jonee1405]

Ur troll wont make russia weak.Russia alone control full nato.

[@Gaetano.94]

-Trump

[@MrMoscowrus]

say that to our Kinjal -class missiles😂

[@Wedgetail14]

Interestingly, the PAK DA has already entered the world of fiction - I was reading "Arctic Storm Rising" by Dale Brown, which involves a prototype being stolen by a rouge Russian guy and flying it to remote Alaska for ransom, where the American guys hunt it down. That book deliberately left the small features of the bomber ambiguous in a way that when the actual bomber comes out, it will fit right in. It's a really good read.

[@MarvelousSeven]

Sounds like the plot behind "Firefox" to me.

[@brianwesley28]

@@MarvelousSeven I was thinking the same.

[@rhpiggy123]

Inverse of Day of the Cheetah by the sounds of it

[@Wedgetail14]

I guess so. It's been a few decades. Well, more like a brand new "Flight of the Old Dog" that started something new in the upcoming releases.

[@bosoerjadi2838]

Dale Brown's 'Night of the Hawk' also features a stealth bomber, a Belarussian one, built in Lithuania with the help of a brainwashed 'Old Dog' crew member, Dave Luger. One of his best. The books Dale Brown published before 2000 were all pretty solid in plausible near-future tech, the plots and the writing were (still) quite good. His dialogues were never masterpieces, but sufficient in techno-thrillers. After 'Battle Born', imo, the quality crashed from just a 'still enjoyable' into 'annoyingly cringeworthy recycled waste of time'. To his defense, Brown recycled mainly his own original plot ideas. And it is hard to connect a futuristic strategic strike force to a post 9/11 real-world, dominated by headlines about the war on terror and on low-tech insurgents, in which air strikes usually aren't solving the big problems. Which is the Dale Brown trope: problems caused by bad guys to US, difficult high tech air strike solves the problems (despite US leadership having forbidden the strike). Also, a noticeable read is his 'Storming Heaven' from 1994, in which a terrorist mastermind has passenger planes crashing into airports, threatening to do the same to industrial, military and political objects. It also contains, quite prophetically, the inception of something like Homeland Security. In Brown's fiction that solved the terrorist problem. In the real-world however, it was just part of a new chapter in the conflict.

[@santoshverma860]

Wow..Russia also entered in stealth bomber race.. it will be very interesting to see how Russia will manage it.. because this race is very costly..

[@joyalsajan1168]

Ya,i mean they have even buit a stealth bomber drone ...So,the significance of stealth bombers will increase in future wars...

[@danielaramburo7648]

They will probably keep a small fleet in key locations. It is an expensive toy.

[@dalelumina3]

stealth bombers are extremely expensive, it cost $50 BILLION just to create the B2 and it costs millions of dollars to maintain them even when they aren't flying. Russia will most definitely not keep a large fleet of bombers edited for more accurate values

[@StrangerHappened]

@@dalelumina3 Indeed, Russia has Su-34 as a bomber (though it is a universal machine) and other planes. This new stealth bomber will not be made in crazy quantities, it has a limited mostly strategic role.

[@TerryTerius]

@@dalelumina3 That’s partly because the US ordered so few of them, so the cost per unit exploded. The B 21 raider is *significantly* less expensive than that to both purchase and maintain. But the raider is cheaper in large part because of lessons learned from earlier stealth platforms that have brought down cost with time, whereas this is Russia’s first foray into the space so… Who knows.

[@dalentalas]

Nice touch with the hull name. Russia tends to name large airframes (civilian ones after cultural icons, military ones after heroes). This one is named after Nikolai Gulayev, one of the aces in the Battle of Kursk: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nikolai_Gulayev .

[@jimwhite967]

this comment aged well

[@dalentalas]

@@jimwhite967 do elaborate.

[@samiullahayan4210]

🇧🇩🇧🇩🇧🇩❤️🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺

[@sir_squonks_alot_castro4438]

China can reach further then you said with their missiles but still sucks compared to our bomber. Plus Russia couldn’t even make/finish their new tank… they definitely not making a stealth bomber lol china took a crashed stealth bomber for study and had spies steal blueprints for the bombers and it still isn’t close to our bomber.

[@floppi7098]

@@dalentalashe didnt 😂

[@entvisual]

*The Guardian of The Arctic* ❄️Tupolev PAK DA an amazing stealth vehicle!!

[@CrayonEater255]

That doesn’t exists and never will

[@in_tasin]

@@CrayonEater255 But the word never will never will.

[@juliodyarzagaray]

When all two of them are ready to go the world will tremble

[@apollo5261]

$5 it will never fly over a war zone.

[@crimeanhawk123]

Russia's strategy does not presuppose a preemptive strike or an attack on Nuclear states. In this regard, we do not need stealth very much. Of course, it is good if the plane is visible from a shorter distance, but in general it is not critical. There is no real stealth aircraft in our world. It all depends on the radar and the range. But what we really need is that the aircraft in full combat load could fly 11 time zones without refueling. At the same time, it should have a good speed (more than that of the tu160) and load capacity, as well as a mode of operation from -50 to +50. In addition, our strategists assume that such an aircraft will be used on duty, which means that in addition to high speed, it should also have a very economical speed that keeps it in the air as long as possible. So, I am sure, the New bomber will not have Stealth but low visibility for radars, but it will have a wide range of speeds and perhaps the high-altitude ceiling will be space (60+ km). I think so

[@50megatondiplomat28]

Great comment, Яков Фоминых, most civilians don't realize that different countries have different requirements based on many different factors, including, but not limited to, their geography, their strategy, their environment, and their production ability. They think if aircraft A doesn't have similar performance characteristics to aircraft B, then the country that produced aircraft A got it wrong. This isn't true, they just had a different set of requirements.

[@ТимурФахуртдинов]

Земляк дело говорит

[@malithaw]

Good explanation

[@williamzk9083]

"Russia's strategy does not presuppose a preemptive strike or an attack on Nuclear state" this has dated and looks quite ridiculous. Russia liberally threatens nuclear war even against small states as small as Estonia as part of its oppressive and arrogant 'zone of influence' imperialism policies. All of Russia's attacks have begun Treacherously whether it was using the Naval Base at Sevastopol that Ukraine had leased to Russia or the Febuary 24th 2022 invasion of Ukraine. -Russia's policies have always involved denial and sneak attacks. Stealth is just a technology Russia hasn't mastered yet. -Being able to fly 11 time zones at speed is not important. 11 times zones is enough in reality such a large bomber wouldn't fly missions from the border. It would get destroyed by missiles if within 1 time zone of a border.

[@masterhacker7065]

aircraft like the b2 and b21 are true stealth aircraft and not low observability as they are almost invisible to low frequency search radars and high frequency track radars.

[@kittenastrophy5951]

That's more of the "blended wing-body" type of aircraft than a flying wing.

[@DocWolph]

I would be more convinced of the design, if the engine intakes were on the dorsal surface of the plane to keep them from being seen by radar on the ground or lower angles.

[@iprofox3758]

Nobody cares if your convinced.

[@foabmoab]

PAK-FA has some peculiar design choices as well that reduce its stealth profile, like the forward canards and I think the sensor bubble.

[@DocWolph]

@@iprofox3758 Wow. You really have no life do you?

[@DocWolph]

@@foabmoab I have no idea what is going on in Russia to literally walk up to the line of "getting it right" to just flub it like that.

[@foabmoab]

@@DocWolph Think I've seen it previously mentioned before that because its one of their first forays into a stealth design, they hadn't perfect it. Although given the decades of research and other successful designs, its still a bit curious.

[@thejdgoodwin]

Very imaginative.

[@timosaksala4797]

A linguistic correction: at 2:21 in "discern" c is prounounced as s, not as k

[@tahustvedt]

It's weird how Russia has gone from "Stealth is useless" to "Here's our new stealth fighter."

[@ЕвгенийБулыгин-д6ч]

Nothing weird here. US stealth tech was indeed quite useless against Russian Army radars and their crews (not some export versions operated by God knows who). So Russia implemented different approach making planes with stealthiness being not a key future, but a way to reduce radar signature as much as possible without harming too much other parameters, which cant be said about F-117, F-35 and B-2. The exception here is S-70, but its a drone, so different story. About PAK-DA there is so few information, than its not even worth to speculate for now. It can continue in such a state for next 20 years. while Russia producing TU-160M2, or its work could be rushed in recent years following completely different design than shown in video.

[@Baer9471]

@@ЕвгенийБулыгин-д6ч still remember when a nighthawk actually got detected by a 1950s soviet radar in Yugoslavia? Yeah USA at the time is hilarious

[@Radialguy]

Stealth is expensive Russian military budget small so no good stealth means no stealth.

[@ЕвгенийБулыгин-д6ч]

@@Radialguy Russian military budget is adequate to its tasks. Its US military budget is overblown by lobbysts so much that everything cost insane summ of money and more of it you have to pay even more for its maintanance.

[@tahustvedt]

@@ЕвгенийБулыгин-д6ч Sounds like pure propaganda.

[@Rio_SenpaiYT]

You really can see how good the quality has been improved ^^

ℂ𝕒𝕦𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟: 𝕋𝕙𝕚𝕤 𝕡𝕣𝕠𝕗𝕚𝕝𝕖 𝕔𝕠𝕟𝕥𝕒𝕚𝕟𝕤 𝕡𝕠𝕥𝕖𝕟𝕥𝕚𝕒𝕝𝕝𝕪 𝕤𝕖𝕟𝕤𝕚𝕥𝕚𝕧𝕖 𝕔𝕠𝕟𝕥𝕖𝕟𝕥 ▄︻̷̿┻̿═━一 ASIANTEEN.SPACE Megan: "Hotter" Hopi: "Sweeter" Joonie: "Cooler" Yoongi: "Butter Asi con toy y sus mañas no se la lease que escriba bien mamon hay nomas pa ra reirse un rato y no estar triste y estresado.por la vida dura que se vive hoy . Köz karaş: ''Taŋ kaldım'' Erinder: ''Sezimdüü'' Jılmayuu: ''Tattuuraak'' Dene: ''Muzdak'' Jizn, kak krasivaya melodiya, tolko pesni pereputalis. Aç köz arstan Bul ukmuştuuday ısık kün bolçu, jana arstan abdan açka bolgon. Uyunan çıgıp, tigi jer-jerdi izdedi. Al kiçinekey koyondu gana taba algan. Al bir az oylonboy koyondu karmadı. ''Bul koyon menin kursagımdı toyguza albayt'' dep oylodu arstan. Arstan koyondu öltüröyün dep jatkanda, bir kiyik tigi tarapka çurkadı. Arstan aç köz bolup kaldı. Kiçine koyondu emes, çoŋ kiyikti jegen jakşı dep oylodu.#垃圾 Son unos de los mejores conciertos , no puede ir pero de tan solo verlos desde pantalla, se que estuvo sorprendente 💗❤️💌💘💟

[@woodonfire7406]

I always wondered about the Russian military and Air Force With the reveal and development of the S-70 stealth drone, why not make it an unmanned stealth bomber that could carry laser guided bombs, Air to surface missiles and whatever arsenal that can fit in there as a cheaper and quick alternative?

[@DownWizzer]

In addition to the usual functions of the s70 combat drone, it is already seen as strengthening aviation by placing long-range air-to-air missiles on board and escorting or commanding a su57 group. In general, an increase in ammunition! While all the options I think are being developed and I hope we will never see a real application!

[@nedimharacic1809]

I dont think thay can just jet but sanctions are making problems now very big problems

[@georgeantabi6025]

@@nedimharacic1809 what I'm going to say now is only my opinion so don't take it like it's 100% true. If the sanctions don't get lifted from Russia, this might encourage them to try to make their own stuff, and slowly but surely in a few years, they might have a small.... let's say microchip industry, and that would be the best for Russia. But I think this might take a long time.

[@bullwinklethemooseME]

😂 omg! You're kid ?????

[@nedimharacic1809]

@@georgeantabi6025 maybe......idk

[@kevinjohnson8995]

Very nice AirCraft. WoW

[@abhishekmahanta1112]

You are gonna beat MUSTARD my friend. Nope you can make a movie with this insane video quality.

[@dreamhunter2973]

If they can afford it, then Russian Airforce would have a really Dangerous weapon...as their hypersonic missiles would make it extremely dangerous.......maybe more than or equal to the B 21, but they need to find a stable way to afford it......

ℂ𝕒𝕦𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟: 𝕋𝕙𝕚𝕤 𝕡𝕣𝕠𝕗𝕚𝕝𝕖 𝕔𝕠𝕟𝕥𝕒𝕚𝕟𝕤 𝕡𝕠𝕥𝕖𝕟𝕥𝕚𝕒𝕝𝕝𝕪 𝕤𝕖𝕟𝕤𝕚𝕥𝕚𝕧𝕖 𝕔𝕠𝕟𝕥𝕖𝕟𝕥 ▄︻̷̿┻̿═━一 ASIANTEEN.SPACE Megan: "Hotter" Hopi: "Sweeter" Joonie: "Cooler" Yoongi: "Butter Asi con toy y sus mañas no se la lease que escriba bien mamon hay nomas pa ra reirse un rato y no estar triste y estresado.por la vida dura que se vive hoy . Köz karaş: ''Taŋ kaldım'' Erinder: ''Sezimdüü'' Jılmayuu: ''Tattuuraak'' Dene: ''Muzdak'' Jizn, kak krasivaya melodiya, tolko pesni pereputalis. Aç köz arstan Bul ukmuştuuday ısık kün bolçu, jana arstan abdan açka bolgon. Uyunan çıgıp, tigi jer-jerdi izdedi. Al kiçinekey koyondu gana taba algan. Al bir az oylonboy koyondu karmadı. ''Bul koyon menin kursagımdı toyguza albayt'' dep oylodu arstan. Arstan koyondu öltüröyün dep jatkanda, bir kiyik tigi tarapka çurkadı. Arstan aç köz bolup kaldı. Kiçine koyondu emes, çoŋ kiyikti jegen jakşı dep oylodu.#垃圾 Son unos de los mejores conciertos , no puede ir pero de tan solo verlos desde pantalla, se que estuvo sorprendente 💗❤️💌💘💟

[@commerce-usa]

Hey, here's an idea... Let's install a declining geriatric who will decimate his own country's energy independence and beg Russia for oil that they can then sell at inflated prices. 🙄 Nah, bad idea.

[@RReese08]

@@commerce-usa That geriatric got voted out of office in November 2020. He's now happily doing lines and scamming money from his sheep in Florida. Happy to clear things up for you.

[@charlylucky7508]

@@commerce-usa, self sustained energy dependence for the first time in years. Meh, what for, let's give that to Russia and just buy oil from them. Fukn stupidest thing ever. What's even scarier is that some idiots still think our country is doing great.

[@jamesricker3997]

@@commerce-usa the Russians did that in 2016 Now it looks like Putin is having early onset Alzheimer's

[@DeNihility]

They should make it a UAV, with an even larger body, and give it the capability to launch and deploy swarms of smaller drones.

[@MrDominatord7]

And call it the arsenal bird ?

[@michaelmeltzer3397]

It does not matter: short of nuclear war, Russia is finished as a world bully. Their air force will be erased in hours, if they start.

[@stablegenius4059]

They should just shut up and stop propaganda. They got horrible army and air force.

[@b.griffin317]

Having engine inlets below the wing and un shielded exhausts isn't going to help with stealth. Neither are the wing tip winglets.

[@Heidelaffe]

Apperently you haven‘t watched the entire Video before writing a comment?

[@markmitchell450]

Video clearly states sacrifices were made regarding stealth for speed

[@jerrybond1757]

@@markmitchell450 they haven't developed a decent fighter jet yet with a decent engine that's supposed to be stealth.

[@aneutralguy2606]

@@jerrybond1757 They made a stealth plane with a jet engine with air intakes and outtakes optimized for stealth capabilities, I guess it doesn't count since it's a drone But they are definitely capable of doing that on a fighter jet, just give them time

[@M16_Akula-III]

@@jerrybond1757 5th Gen aircraft don't even have a definition. The only thing it needs is: Stealth (Don't care how much, as long as it's smaller than the aircraft itself), can carry multiple types of weapons, has a very good sensor fusion, and a good balance for speed and maneuverability.

[@bryanrussell6679]

This one is parked right next to the Su-75 checkmate.

[@chiefkeefgaming2005]

cant kill what doesnt exist

[@iBolitN]

"Flying prototype in 22-23", those would probably arrive right after Iran drones and KNDR commandos )

[@doggonemess1]

Us 'Mericans say "eff one seventeen" for the F-117. When saying the numeric designation, we never say the number as a number. It's either "one seventeen" or sometimes "one one seven". I don't know why this is, but it's consistent across all fighters, bombers, and other aircraft. EDIT: Also, when saying the designations of Soviet (and now Russian) aircraft, MiG is "mig", SU is "ess you", TU is "tee you", Yak is "yack", etc. I think that we tend to say the acronym as a word if it's more than two letters long. And yes, I'm probably getting pedantic, but I'm over 40 so I need to practice more for when I'm older.

[@blurglide]

Yeah- same when we're talking about missiles and stuff. I notice the Brits will say "A-I-M One hundred twenty" rather than "aim one twenty". Also, I think a big reason we say "tee you" is because otherwise it sounds like "Two"

[@beyondrecall9446]

Well, you just spell it, I mean you spell most of the things.. And I prefer the American "Ef one seventeen" than having to go through "ef one hundred seventeen" I mean, if that's the Brittish way, it's kinda stupid, idk, don't like it. I'm from Serbia, btw and we say "SU like "su" , and everything like that, actually, when I was a kid, one morning, knowing that how much I love planes, dad took me for an one hour drive to see the downed eF one seventeen and I took tore a piece of it.. it's coating is kinda like 0.5 cm of some hard rubber (I mean, that's what it feels like..) Btw, don't think that we all hate 'Mericans.. got a lot of friends from the US who stumbled upon this city and somehow, they stayed, fell in love, got jobs and stuff.. can't leave now cos' they love it .. friends etc... Some of the guys from places like LA say that it's cos it's the most chill place in the world and after hearing what's happening on the streets there, all the crime and shit.. damn .. Had a Russian and American friend talking one time and this russan friend, Pavel was like : "....and I dot stabbed once while in Moscow...." and my friend Juan was like "shit, son... you only got stabbed once?" that cracked me up.. I know that probably most people don't go through that kind of stuff but LA, selling weed and stuff on the streets, doing time for that...

[@bujoun76]

Sorry "Dogg" but Russians say Soo for SU and Too TU and so on. We Americans/Mexicans a wrong and lazy frankly. You've got it backwards. For years I have listened to Russians pronounce the names of their own aircraft. The first part of the names comes from the companies that made the aircraft. The commentator is correct. Except for when ge said "discern". That was strange.

[@doggonemess1]

@@bujoun76 Really?! I just realized I've never listened to a Russia talking about their own aircraft. Thanks for the info!

[@SergeiSugaroverdoseShuykov]

@@bujoun76 first part of family name, yet you completely correct, same thing for Mi(Mikoyan) and KA(Kamov) we never pronounce those as two capital characters, instead - in a single word

[@KGoBang]

Flying a combat mission and being allowed to fly around is two completely different things.

[@F.O.U.N.D.E.R]

RUSSIANS DOESN'T NEED TO WAIT FOR ORDERS , COMRADE

[@checkmate7745]

​@@F.O.U.N.D.E.Rwe have Primary resources for the aircraft industry and a strong industrial and knowledge base

[@F.O.U.N.D.E.R]

@@checkmate7745 and your F-35 was lost with all that, cope

[@Michael_Michaels]

Amazing graphic work, mate! Congrats and thanks for sharing!

[@nukestrom5719]

Looks good on paper but I don't they will ever produce a one that can match US counterparts.

[@christiansalcedoii9632]

Any one remember the T-14 Armada?

[@juliap.5375]

First serial models on state tests now. Before to launch full scale serial production. Do you think it is long process? Okey. Let’s remember. First prototype of T-80 arrived in 1969, serial production launched in 1976 - 7 years later. But T-80 even not created from scratch and it was not so complicated. Another example, Germany and France several years agp promised to create own similar to T-14 tank and it will arrive in… 2035. They create it together because it is too complicated for each country alone. New tank, from scratch, first in own generation - it is not so fast as you can think. Russia built first prototype in 2015. In 2021 tank passed all state tests and accepted to army. In 2022 factory produced first tanks with serial technology. Now they again pass tests to confirm capabilities of factory and then serial production. So? And what about three new Russian class of nuclear strategic submarines, new ICBMs and SLBMs from scratch, S-400, S-500, Su-35 and Su-57, and so on, a lot of other weapons?)

[@LiterallyMojo]

@@juliap.5375the t14 was supposed to be in full mass production a decade ago. It was already considered "tested". They never fixed the engine, no one is looking to buy them, and there is no evidence that they are even still considering fielding it since no facilities for even building the tank are under construction or have been built

[@lefunnyN1]

​@@juliap.5375what a cope dude

[@AlexDahl]

The range maps you're showing are just a bit misleading because the earth is laid out flat... instead of like a sphere, as it normally would be. If the russians were to ever launch an attack on the US, they would probably fly over the north pole and through Canada, which is a much shorter route distance wise, and is probably the reason why the engines are rated to go in such cold temperatures. This has been the case since roughly the 1950's when ICBM's became a thing, where both countries realized the shortest route was over the north pole, not to fly over europe and across the atlantic ocean. Would be great if you could take more time to consider that in future videos.

[@davidlucas9582]

Came here for the same comment. It's less than 10,000 km from Moscow to San Diego via direct polar route. Equally importantly bombers don't take off from Red Square, they could take off anywhere within Russian Borders, so the effective range is 12,000 km from the russian border. 9,000 km from Sochi to Cape town, 10,000 km from Vladisvostok to New Zealand. 12,000 km from Western Russia to Argentina. Basically everywhere in the world except the southern 1/3 of South America and Antarctica. Also,...12,000km one way nuclear strike vs 6,000km return flight ? Mid air refueling ? It appears I've gone full on pedantic over a map I suppose.

[@moggrick7084]

@@davidzhabin only a child doesn’t understand escalation

[@dkgamez2959]

@@LoadOShite lmao

[@iprofox3758]

@@moggrick7084 Hes right any war would escalate to nukes very fast.

[@floatingdeadfish4080]

@@LoadOShite bait

[@dotsmassacre]

Just a tip, for your future forays... what you need is an ellipsoid shape that both allows the choking of mass and the broad expansion of exhaust gasses... circles were nice fifty years ago... what also helps is if you have inductive cooling to reduce the heat of those expanded gases quickly after the point of ejection so as not to create a massive plume... I mean, if we take at face value the kind of fuels that Russia uses to avoid frosting... that's a tall order... because usually, that exhaust is going to be fuel rich...

[@tmseh]

Beautiful glowing exhaust.

[@pieter-bashoogsteen2283]

Well I have to give it to them, that’s a very good looking aircraft.

[@davidphillips8674]

If it existed the Russians would have used it in Ukraine over the last 9 months. This video hasn’t aged well

[@ВасилийПетечкин-ч3ц]

Су 57 наносят удары

[@KyIieMinogue]

2:21 did you just say “dis-Kern” when you were trying to say discern? 😂

[@My-Opinion-Doesnt-Matter]

11:23 could qualify for hybrid wing body.

ℂ𝕒𝕦𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟: 𝕋𝕙𝕚𝕤 𝕡𝕣𝕠𝕗𝕚𝕝𝕖 𝕔𝕠𝕟𝕥𝕒𝕚𝕟𝕤 𝕡𝕠𝕥𝕖𝕟𝕥𝕚𝕒𝕝𝕝𝕪 𝕤𝕖𝕟𝕤𝕚𝕥𝕚𝕧𝕖 𝕔𝕠𝕟𝕥𝕖𝕟𝕥 ▄︻̷̿┻̿═━一 ASIANTEEN.SPACE Megan: "Hotter" Hopi: "Sweeter" Joonie: "Cooler" Yoongi: "Butter Asi con toy y sus mañas no se la lease que escriba bien mamon hay nomas pa ra reirse un rato y no estar triste y estresado.por la vida dura que se vive hoy . Köz karaş: ''Taŋ kaldım'' Erinder: ''Sezimdüü'' Jılmayuu: ''Tattuuraak'' Dene: ''Muzdak'' Jizn, kak krasivaya melodiya, tolko pesni pereputalis. Aç köz arstan Bul ukmuştuuday ısık kün bolçu, jana arstan abdan açka bolgon. Uyunan çıgıp, tigi jer-jerdi izdedi. Al kiçinekey koyondu gana taba algan. Al bir az oylonboy koyondu karmadı. ''Bul koyon menin kursagımdı toyguza albayt'' dep oylodu arstan. Arstan koyondu öltüröyün dep jatkanda, bir kiyik tigi tarapka çurkadı. Arstan aç köz bolup kaldı. Kiçine koyondu emes, çoŋ kiyikti jegen jakşı dep oylodu.#垃圾 Son unos de los mejores conciertos , no puede ir pero de tan solo verlos desde pantalla, se que estuvo sorprendente 💗❤️💌💘💟

[@smoketinytom]

Having looked at this and the recent sanctions and revelations that Russia had to import Modern chips and motherboards, I’m gonna say this aircraft is going to be delayed bumpy quite a lot.

[@Sgt_Bill_T_Co]

Those hot engines [if these pictures are accurate] provide easy targets for SHASM Technology!.

[@ville-veikkomakela6506]

They can’t even manufacture their usual tanks without western chips. Their largest tank manufacturer, Uralvagonzavod, has halted production.

[@LouSassol69er]

​@@ville-veikkomakela6506 they'll get them from China no doubt. China love sponsoring depraved war crime riddled armies and madmen, such as Putin and Kim Jung Un.

[@Soktastovich]

@@ville-veikkomakela6506 western chips? The most advanced US fighter gets its chip from Taiwan!

[@barkin94]

@@ville-veikkomakela6506 херню не неси что что но военная техника из отечественных компонентов создается а вот если Китай заберет Тайвань то тогда сша с маленькой буквы обосрутся по полной

[@sturmanaskie]

There is no way the PAK-DA has those winglets

[@garrettharriman6333]

I'm gonna guess they build one or two, fly it around during May Day parades, and keep them in hangars because they're too expensive to utilize.

[@human8750]

it is truely only exist in KZbin 🤣

[@bocko159]

just like US hypersonic CGI missiles 😂

[@Tyrife]

seems that putin might have to delay the introduction within another 6 years forward lol

[@johnw9190]

This is where KZbin needs a laugh reaction.

[@alexmation274]

i was accually reading a book called "dale brown Artic storm rising" and it has this exact plane in it lol

[@pal6636]

I think Vlad decided he needed another castle instead

[@lucasokeefe7935]

If this is indeed what the PAK-DA design will look like, it should still be trackable by most naval radars... vertical surfaces, thick wings, exposed nacelles with large heat signatures. this thing will maybe match the SR-71 for RCS while not being able to fly nearly as high or fast. They clearly don't trust their tech enough to make any real attempt at a stealth bomber

[@OrtonHeadXIV]

i don't think anyone knows how the actual PAK-DA looks like, everything is just concept arts and animations, it should look like the B2 anyway the Russians can't run from physics as that is the optimal shape for low radar bomber design.

[@lucasokeefe7935]

@@OrtonHeadXIV Fun fact: The B-21 design is pretty much what the Northrop design team had in mind for the B-2 originally. They got it so right in the 70s and 80s they had to nerf it to make it fair! :P

[@lucasokeefe7935]

@Mike burner Well they've certainly found other ways to do that recently...

[@DownWizzer]

If you are not yet aware of Russian missile technology, I advise you to familiarize yourself with the specifications of hypersonic and cruise missiles, this aircraft will not even have to leave Russian airspace to strike. And stealth for the most part will be beneficial so that the aircraft is not detected, for example, AWACS with the specifics of the signal has long been familiar to Russian intelligence. It's just that some hypersonic missiles of the KINKHAL type need an air launch.

[@lucasokeefe7935]

@@DownWizzer "So you've built this aircraft, yeah?" "Yeah." "And it doesn't need to leave Russian airspace to fire these fancy missiles yeah?" "Yeah!" "So what's the point?" "Our missiles need Viagra to shoot properly."

[@rhpiggy123]

Excellent video. Love the design of it. I'm nervous that the real thing won't look as good.

[@ModelAviationStation]

Nick I wanted to know if you have heard about a new aerospace startup company called Radian Aerospace? They are in the process of developing a single stage to orbit space plane called the Radian one which is very similar to the Rockwell International Star Raker and I’d love to hear your thoughts on what you think of this 21st century Star Raker. Has anyone else heard about this?

[@Jesusrules974]

hmm interesting, to add to this acherer aviation is making a new aircraft that suposedly going to used like a car mass produced and electric thanks for you time very interesting topic keep watching to skies eh?

[@georgethompson1460]

SSTO's are unlikely.

[@ModelAviationStation]

@@georgethompson1460 unlikely but would totally be epic to see in person.

[@vucaja]

this is totaly invisible, no one has seen it yet

[@paulvanmeveren7488]

with Russia cut off from American electronics. What are the hopes of any new bomber being made?

[@samsim4648]

Russian invisible bombers are so invisible even Russians can't see them

[@futurecorpse7330]

I think it looks great. With the B2 being so unique this will be looked at like a knockoff version of the B2 but I mean it’s just a good shape for the main purpose of the aircraft

[@kelvinpaccaya3411]

Callate a llorar a otro laso

[@destroyedsoul1791]

It nowhere resembles b2 in anyway you stupid morons.

[@lgflanang]

The Russian bomber is so stealthy it was never seen or detected in Ukraine.

[@Arkasha-Z]

Because it's just as new as the B-21, and that B-21 hasn't been seen in Syria yet. Same exact logic

[@legendary4570]

@@Arkasha-Zdifference being that there are already 6 B-21 Raiders in active development and it’s first flight to take place later this year. Russia has yet to show anything.

[@Arkasha-Z]

@@legendary4570 And who's to say that the PAK-DA isn't also in active development? You can? Well then, thank you for your service I guess, you must be some super ultra CIA intelligence operator to be able to penetrate the security of the military industrial complex of another country and then share your findings in a KZbin comment.

[@legendary4570]

@@Arkasha-Z you really don’t think Russia would be flexing its stealth capabilities if it could do so? China showed off its J-20 and capabilities, it showed its working on 6th gen stealth fighters hell even North Korea showed off new ICBM tech lol! Yet you’re telling me Russia can’t show anything?

[@Arkasha-Z]

@@legendary4570 Here, let me introduce you to a new word, Classified clas·si·fied - /ˈklasəˌfīd/ adjective: (of information or documents) designated as officially secret and to which only authorized people may have access.

[@tahzib1451]

imagine making a circle of 12k km but missing Alaska completely, when its just a short hop from the extreme east of the Russian landmass....

[@davidandkimbenton]

If the PAK DA is designed as shown, then it would only be stealthy from a frontal aspect, but not from the rear, the engines would be easily detectable. It is the same with their fighters.

[@harrisn3693]

The F-35 is very detectable from rear

[@killingyouwithlogic5808]

@@harrisn3693 No its not its rear signature in comparison to Russian Fighters is night and day they do not modify there Rear Engins The F-35 is designed to still keep a smaller Radar signature

[@CrayonEater255]

@@harrisn3693 Compared to Russian aircraft, no

[@theCharmingDeviant]

It has long been my understanding that the PAK-DA was a Sukhoi project, not that the distinction matters as much these days with the design bureaus being consolidated now... An interesting video nonetheless. Cheers!

[@shamimhuq2134]

The best bomber by the best mathematicians and Engineers - from Russia.

[@NJOYSouthAfrica]

I agree - second only to Israel, with the US a distant 3rd, soon to be caught up by China.

[@aaronbent6791]

Like anything that's russian. It's a fantasy. A dream.

[@squadronrsvp5602]

"Jizz flying everywhere at Taco Balls. Eat me Russia. Then pukin" XD

[@rodgermurphy5721]

Invisible...because it's not real

[@qray4851]

I hope this plane is as good as the rest of the Russian military!

[@jackwhitetron]

I see what you did there...lol

[@davidoryiman2398]

We don't kill civilians we can't use out new high technology weapons fighting a no country like Ukraine just get that in your head

[@57menjr]

lol

[@mastergamer-ut9uj]

This hits different after Russia declared war.

[@NickoHUN]

I always love rewatching couple years old videos about hyped superweapons that turned out to be useless moneysinks.

[@EXMX28]

I have a feeling that Russia is going to have to make do with the Tu160 for many many years to come.

[@eagle_2351]

Russia using stealth tech? This is gonna be interesting...

[@elkuniku2185]

Aint interesting anymore if you die from it...

[@elkuniku2185]

@@Walter_Stroud ill take that as a compliment

[@TheUglyGnome]

Your range charts are way off. You forgot we don't live on a flat disc. Next time use something like Gcmap to create range charts ... unless you are a flat earther, of course.

[@tomer.aviation]

The Pak-Da will most likely not be built. With Russia’s deteriorating situation in Ukraine and worsening economy, there’s no way in hell that they are going to get enough funding to build them.

[@ivantimofeev3400]

yet months after the fact the economy is still holding better than predicted by western analysts, and ironically better than some European countries themselves don't forget Russia is an expert on building military tech while on red numbers

[@incognito867]

Russia Economy will not go down anytime soon Eu will ran back to them remember Russia can sell to south America and Asia and Africa not only Europe 🤣

[@shelbyseelbach9568]

If it enters production, I'll be amazed.

[@nkordo2551]

This video is more real than the plane itself.

[@rufusredneck3981]

Are we sure it's Russian and not Klingon? Could be a false flag; just sayin !

[@antonchigurh6590]

Wow! Again;awesome military technology from Russia!

[@TheCerebralDude]

40 years behind Americans lol

[@Subpac_ww2]

America: Actually unveils things Russia: Did you see those CGI renderings at the Arms Expo no one buys shit from?

[@mangeshchalan8786]

If it comes out like this it's going to the most gorgeous plane ever

[@Busterbucker204]

Trust me Russia doesn’t have the funds for this 😂

[@Heythere12344]

@@Busterbucker204trust you? Sure kid 😂

[@midnightrider1100]

Russian can't even make a true stealth fighter so there is no way they can build a truly stealth bomber. Low visibility at best.

[@guily6669]

I really love the design of that aircraft but since it's "invisible" no one will ever see it 😁

[@martin1377]

Sorry but stealth is not just the design of the aircraft. Typically Russian it has the engine exhausts exposed, thus it's IR signature would be massive. Russia has also struggled to develop RAM materials for their "stealth" fleet. Like the Pak 50 they will be built in very small numbers and will not have the same sensor or ECM suites the BS's have. To say this is true stealth is a stretch!

[@woodonfire7406]

@@martin1377 he meant invisible as in like “non existent" Because it's still in development and no mock ups or prototypes have been heard or tested before EVER

[@_Valeriy_109]

@@martin1377 you have been told too much nonsense about stealth technology ... all F35s are perfectly detected by Russian electronic warfare ... there is nothing invisible in them either!

[@martin1377]

@@_Valeriy_109 Where in my statement did I say they were invisible? You mean like Wonder Woman's plane? or do you mean hard to detect! Might I suggest you go look at the definition of Stealth! Typical Russian ALWAYS on the defensive!. ALL stealth aircraft get seen eventually, it is about mitigating the radar cross section in order to get closer BEFORE you are detected. Go back to your thin walled khrushchyovka! And dream of your military might!

[@jkllkj4703]

อิอิ!(funny)

[@sprivet]

У нас есть Ту-160М, пока не превзойденный по скорости, к тому же обладающий малозаметность и способный наносить ядерные удары не заходя в зону ПВО противника. ПАК-ДА это далёкая перспектива, облик его никому не известен, кроме тех, кто участвует в разработке.

[@ОлександрСиленко-у4э]

🤣🤣🤣 ти серйозно? Це гівно зробили щоб бабло з бюджету смоктать і такі як ти лохи ,, ощущали величие,, , його прототип , В1В і менше , і економічніше і технологічніше , а бойове навантаження більше, він здатен виконувати у рази більший спектр завдань

[@Qua_off]

У вас есть лапти и кокошник, все остальное далёкая перспектива телевизора)

[@user-ov8uo9fy1v]

​​​@@Qua_offСмотрите, чтобы эта перспектива что-нибудь не скинула в ваш свинарник

[@LiterallyMojo]

Calling the tu160 a "stealth bomber" is like calling the b52 a stealth bomber

[@glnholler]

So, their military can't even supply their troops with the proper equipment and even proper MREs and you're telling me that they have the funds to develop this type of aircraft?

[@dereenaldoambun9158]

And they can't even mass-produced their T-90, T-14 Armata & Su-57. 🤣

[@enadolgel5504]

Very nice 3D demonstration

[@MatthewOBrien-ds1xv]

"Red stars on it's wings" is soooo 40 years ago.

[@juliap.5375]

Stars arrived at late years of Russian Empire.

[@AlbionTVLondon]

Russian bombers, like white swans, so graceful and powerful. It is a joy to watch them fly and even release their payload. Those on receiving end would feel honoured they are being visited by such legends of outstanding engineering and aesthetic beauty, even though such visit would always be a fatal one. ✍✍✍✍✍✍👍

[@002o]

You mean Tu-160 Lancersky? The credit for "legends of outstanding engineering and aesthetic beauty" goes to USA and the original. The original is, naturally Rockwell B-1A Lancer

[@002o]

Or you mean Tu-4? A clean copy of B-29?

[@puddingfoot]

"discern" is pronounced "dissern" come on fam

[@daDonn]

Did you really just pronounce the hard "c" in "discern"? omg lol

[@nosy_old_man]

This is a Tu-160 without tail

[@melgross]

It’s invisible because there aren’t any to see. The newest bomber they have are still from Soviet designs and even manufacture.

[@kendenning6517]

Good show. Makes me wonder if Russia's really going ahead with its development. Besides a few prototypes. My question is, with limited $$ & a much smaller economy than the US, China & some other countries, why invest in a 80's redesigned new bomber? With their Su57's serving as escorts & a new improved 80's designed bomber working in tandem should work 4 them. A lot cheaper & investing in stealth fighters is more advantageous 4 them than spending big $$ on a new stealth bomber. The stealth fighters can B used in different combat missions (losing its stealth in doing so) than a single purpose plane.

[@kendenning6517]

Ps - Plus we have 2 remember that Russia's done this B4. Build prototypes 2 scare the hell out of the Pentagon & then cancel production. Use the $$ 2 build practical simi high tec weapons but less effective & in abundance 2 overwhelm the enemy. C Ukraine invasion now. Mass numerical numbers but not highly accurate & satisfactory outcomes.

[@stannicolae4623]

Because russia big and strong

[@kendenning6517]

@@stannicolae4623 only thing U said that's right is russia's big. It is big. Strong is another subject comparing its military size 2 other nations. Big doesn't equal a battle field win muchless winning a war. Big and bloated with old equipment, loaded down with a top down command structure will lead 2 military failure evey time. See the war in Ukraine 4 proof. The Ukrainian military is a 10th of Russia's military size but has successfully managed & repealed Russia's invasion. Reversing Russia advances. Thus throwing russia's military in disarray causing it 2 lose ground, causing heavy losses. Both in equipment & personnel losses. Russian casualties totals R greater than US losses during Veitnam and that was a 10yr long war. The Ukrainian war is only 13 months old. Do the math. It ain't looking good 4 the big bad russian bear. Ukraine is kicking those commies ass's back 2 Moscow & gonna let nato handle the rest of the war. Then we'll get a real war if Putin dumb enough 2 keep fighting. It'll B over B4 Russia knows what hit umm. Putins toast.

[@ДанилТикин-д4ь]

Я вам больше скажу..Россия никогда и не думала кого-то завоёвывать..вся наша система основана на защите..и поверьте, она у нас безупречна..

[@kendenning6517]

We can't read Russian. I think that's the language used.

[@lexwaldez]

I'm sure the Russians will develop a beautiful airframe with a pile of hidden design compromises. And when all is said and done, they'll build one or two, show them off at an airshow or two, make sure there's an impressive flyover on parade day, and... that's about it. Considering their entire military budget was less than the Air Force's training budget (and that was before they crippled their own economy and made high tech parts impossible to purchase) I doubt building either of these is a priority. And if this propaganda plane is a priority - just think of all the better ways the Russians could have spent the money. In the words of Napoleon, never interrupt your enemy when they're making a mistake. Russia is making the same mistake they've been making for the last decade. Hilarious.

[@theglitch312]

Russian ambitions: Grow to old USSR borders using conventional land warfare. Russian military: Invests most of their military budget in basically everything you don't need to fight a conventional land war. Dumb wonder weapons, an over the top nuclear arsenal (1/5th would be just as effective), bleeding edge next generation tech they'd never be able to produce in large enough quantities (SU-57, SU-75, T14), a large navy that's incredibly expensive to maintain. Tens of billions utterly wasted. Even before it's stolen by the kleptocratic-elite. All that, while the worst equipped guys on the ground literally get WWI era equipment...

[@эмм-х5х]

Our budget is enough to drive submarines to your shore and sink 90% of your infrastructure according to the Sakharov plan, do not worry about it, my beloved. Kiss kiss

[@davidjolley2468]

Great video, great content, but I gotta say: even when these Russian prototypes are flying in the sky, their attributes are generally *wildly* exaggerated.

[@Saffsa]

A bit like US Administrations Excuses for war

[@kingcrimson9555]

@@Saffsa much like the russian federation's excuses for invading their neighbors

[@pashamikhailov551]

can't wait til it will be added to warthunder

[@Youtubeuser1aa]

0:28 holy SMOKES look at that IR signature !

[@Aranzahas]

Any Russian aircraft can be invisible, just give their pilot enough Vodka. 🛬

[@duuurs]

And due to russian budget constraints, a total of 4 will be produced 🤣

[@cinnreds18]

It doesn’t exist. This is a satire channel. If you like fake stories, this channel is for you.

[@sinamark-com]

Wow! This is truly the successor of the Horten 18

[@alioniltonsantana1463]

A Russia tem oz melhores projetistas na aviação!

[@ukrainewarroom]

No they don't, otherwise they would be building things like the Raider, F35, F22... but Russia isn't, they build junk and then claim it does things it isn't capable of, for example the SU-35 - now proven to be expensive garbage easily shot down using MANPADS. Stealth my back end.

[@walterd7331]

Too bad it’s just a dream for Russia😂😂

[@avicennaren1053]

Oh no its the russians again

[@ultra78721]

Propaganda 🤣😂

[@cody56011]

US - B21 Russia - PAK-DA China - Xian H20 Indians - Hal Tejas 🤭

[@jedgould5531]

Way to go Nick. Only you can pull off a cheeky g’day! 🤣

[@user-di5rm9ee1p]

Tu160 already has range from 11-18 000 km depending on speed. Pak da is just another strategic bomber, true news is pak dp project.

[@ligmasurvivor5600]

legend has it that they are still invisible because none have been made :)