SIGMA 70-200 2.8 Sports REVIEW vs Canon 70-200 2.8L IS III - Is the CHEAPER Lens Actually BETTER?

[@froknowsphoto]

Do you want to WIN a camera? I'm giving away one right here WIN A CAMERA Mega FRO Giveaway froknowsphoto.com/megafro/

[@maximepetitclerc9971]

@Jared can you test it with the MC-11 to see how it performs on the new Sony bodys? THANKS!!!

[@muhammedmahshook3571]

Really want a full frame camera.

[@bear5016]

Yes please!

[@gaborandnova4871]

Very nice of you Jared! Gratz for reaching 1mill subs, you deserve it! :)

[@frankwhite3148]

Will would love to win but I couldn't even afford to buy the glass for it. I bought the cannon rebel series t6 for my wife because she wants to start this new endeavor but we soon found out how expensive this long life dream of hers can get and that's as far as it goes. But at least we are trying. That said we love your content and she has learned a lot in the short time she has had the t6. Keep them coming cause she looks forward to your videos.

[@NapoleonSuarez]

The haters gonna hate, but these real world reviews are exactly why I watch your show. Keep it up, big homie!

[@tombuck]

I have the old version of both these lenses at work, and they’re awesome. I gotta say though, the Sigma is really impressive. Sigma lenses have gotten so good!

[@alchemisthere]

This is so amazing. Today I read a comment from a guy on the Sigma 60 600 video: "Looking forward to see a real world review of the Sigma 70-200mm f2.8 Sports " Now you upload this. Excited to watch this.

[@HuFilms]

I just got the Sigma and it's totally awesome. The lens is super sharp and the optical stabilisation is the best I've used!

[@AJ-mt7zm]

I am planning to buy sigma 70-200mm lence hope it’s better buy

[@njrivetelite]

After watching Id say both lenses did great and Im impressed with what 3rd party lenses have been doing as of late.. focus speed & accuracy... sharpness and color are on point.. Spending less on such lenses no longer means sacrificing quality.. I feel pros could feel confident using these lenses.

[@TheDom0]

I think 15-20 years ago there was a bit of a stigma about buying third party lenses and using them on pro body cameras (people would say there's no point, or it's a waste of money). But now Sigma has come on a long way... the 24-105 art lens is fantastic, and Sigma lenses are a great alternative.

[@luucamNY]

Sigma made a huge name for themselves with the sigma 18-35 1.8

[@divil2273]

Indeed

[@mohdvideos1]

@@divil2273 Exactly

[@XyanGuitar]

Yes! Yes! Yes!!

[@trimmzy]

I just got that I love it already

[@christianmbabazi9722]

Beautiful lens

[@Dug6666666]

The Canon lens is white, makes you look like a pro, nuff said. :)

[@kenhuang3820]

Haha you can fake it with a white lens but at end of day is final images that count anyhow I get your point

[@marcd7332]

KEN HUANG It’s a joke

[@vedranb87]

Are we lens racist now? :D :D

[@barzinlotfabadi]

Just spray paint the sigma

[@devanbumstead]

Unless you use it for video and you want to stay in the shadows. Sigma for the win. Black Lenses Matter.

[@obgmd2624]

Just got the Sigma last week and thrilled I saved the money. Got to use it on my t3i and had some focus issues in low light, but that’s the 9 focus points on the t3i. We will see how it does with my 90D once I get it (on preorder). As a higher level amateur the sigma really fit the bill!

[@rowen0fstrata]

How did it end up performing on the 90d?

[@hollyjostudios]

@@rowen0fstrataright

[@kevindiossi]

Something to remember: Simga lenses, in my extensive ownership, have difficulties focusing consistently on Canon DSLRs. They've been flawless on the EOS R. Sigma and Tamron have greatly improved in build quality and optical quality over the past 5-8 years. Sigmas original 85mm f/1.4 and 70-200 f/2.8 OS lenses were the start of something big for them. Finally, the build quality and design have gotten to top levels.

[@lefteyeviewed]

Great review - I've got an EOS R and I'm trying to decide between these exact lenses. Sigma takes it

[@markhardycreative]

Great review thanks Fro team your content is always a treat and I appreciate the work you put into your vids for people

[@froknowsphoto]

thank you.

[@TeaRexTheMighty]

I'd love to see a direct comparison with the Canon, Tamron and Sigma now that all of them have a "newer" version out.

[@rudranroy2109]

Really care about the glass quality, and better, long-lasting usage ? Put the bucks in and go for Canon. Canon glasses are the best in market, no doubt about that.

[@Badhans2007]

You're so honest man! WOW! I truly appreciate you, the way you explained which one is the best for someone just starting out. Good luck in everything man.

[@14Marleycombe]

This lens is the latest I have in my bag from Sigma having already purchased a number of Art Series lenses as well as the 100-400mm Contemporary. I tested it this past weekend at a Cycling event here in Perth, Australia with amazing results. Even with head on downhill speeds approaching 60 kmh and filling the frame, this lens didn't miss. It is an outstanding piece of equipment.

[@14Marleycombe]

I should add, I had it on my 1DX

[@christianmbabazi9722]

I have a 100 100 400 and I'm considering getting the 70 - 200

[@wanakoplays8874]

Glad the 6DII is getting some love. Despite it's flaws, it's such a good camera, in the right hands.

[@RachelKasparek]

Wanako Plays! Same :) I love mine

[@cammac66]

But sony fanbois be like BUT DR!

[@jamesgrantham1743]

Love mine too!

[@jeepjoseph9036]

I got to use one with the signs art 50 f1.4 and it was a pretty good camera. Not nearly as good as a d850

[@Darth.Nihilist]

the d850 blows the 5d mark iv away spec and performance wise though, so its not really comparable to the 6d mark ii

[@koreybartos]

I'm so glad you found the sigma to be solid. I've been looking forward to this lens for a long time. Now I just need to pull the trigger on a body upgrade. lmao.

[@micklemons8885]

Korey Bartos check Facebook marketplace religiously. I just got my new 1Dx mk ii for a great price. There’s always some nice bodies from people who are updating, or switching brands

[@lukezacharias3245]

@@micklemons8885 Curious, what did you get the mk ii for?

[@micklemons8885]

Luke Zacharias photography and videography. Plus it was my favorite of canon’s line up. Basically I got it because I liked it lol. Definitely wouldn’t recommend it for stuff like portraits, etc, even though it holds up beautifully. At the end of the day it’s still a specialty camera for sports and wildlife.

[@harolsblog]

Thanks bro! This will be my first 70-200 and Im going for the sigma thanks to your review!

[@hunterVworld]

@harolsblog How is the 70-200 after a year of using?

[@harolsblog]

Yap Vi Seng I ended up purchasing the canon from a guy how used it 3 months for $1400 😬😬😬. With the written warranty from B&H. A year after, the Canon is a superb lens 😍😍😍 one of my favorites. Always search ebay for a good deal.

[@yeanisch]

Don't worry, I got you. I just ordered the sigma, I'll post a review here in a few days letting you know how it is. ​@@hunterVworld

[@ericarchitect]

Perfectly timed video Fro! I'm looking at upgrading to a f/2.8 lens for my Canon EOS-R to shoot high school lacrosse. I'm not entirely sure the 70-200 gives me enough reach (currently use Canon 100-400) but it might be my best option since games are in the evenings, under the lights and I really need a f/2.8 lens. Not sure there's another lens out there (under $2,000) that's going to match up. Any suggestions??? Thanks for all the great content!

[@aaaaaaxaaaaaa]

Sigma Killin it! We need more third party options!

[@Darthbishop]

I think the best test for comparison would be to shoot these lenses outdoors because I believe the version III canon 70-200 has updated lens coating and I wonder how it holds up against sun flares/haze over the Sigma. I think anyone looking to buy these lenses are mostly going to be wedding photographers that sometimes shoot outdoor weddings

[@froknowsphoto]

I used it indoors in a tough lighting situation. You can not assume that mostly wedding photographers will be buying this lens. This is a staple or should be a staple of every full frame photographers bag. 24-70 and 70-200. Following down the road would be other specialty lenses.

[@Darthbishop]

Jared Polin if you’re already a Canon 70-200 2.8 IS II owner, would you upgrade or change to the Sigma or Canon....or just keep your version II?

[@mrteecee]

​@@Darthbishop no way: 70-200/2.8 II is really the same as the III version, just 1 coating missing. not worth upgrading to the mkIII and since this Sigma sport and Tamron G2 looks very similar for picture quality - why would you upgrade? (I have the mkII and won't spend money changing it :D )

[@Darthbishop]

Tamás Szügyi good points!

[@Zakna]

way less flaring than the ver2 of the canon L lens. photography-on-the.net/forum/showthread.php?t=1503975 Reviewed it a month ago

[@stephen1942]

Great video. The "lens alliance" always makes me laugh. You mentioned the Tamron G2. How does that compare to the Sigma?

[@gammap6114]

Nobody seems to make a comparison yet? I would like to see side by side

[@MedicRyan18]

The review I have been waiting for. You made the choice pretty easy! I'll be picking up the Sigma soon and cannot wait to get it. Keep up the great work and thank you!

[@KennyRamasawmy]

Did you bought it?

[@michaelshiller7713]

Awesome review Jared! They both look really good. As a Canon shooter I personally would get a Canon 70-200 II used. Besides that we all should consider Sigma and Tamron.

[@GM8D79]

On one of your videos you were able to review the contemporary lens for Sigma then that's when I decided to go for it. Some of us have photography as hobby and not able to afford expensive lenses. A year I got the Sigma contemporary lens 150-600mm ; then few days ago I purchased a used Canon 70-200 2.8 USM without IS. Thank you for taking the time to review both lenses.

[@paulbernardi2597]

Great review Jared. I'm currently in the market for the canon 70-200 but I plan to buy a used lens. There is a lot of pretty good deals out there for around $1100 bucks. Keep up the great reviews!

[@navid8276]

Just got my Sigma today, image quality is superb but I can’t stand how the tri pod collar can’t be taken all the way off. It would also be really helpful to have the zoom ring up front where the focus ring is instead

[@cooloox]

Tremendous real world comparison, as usual, Jared. You're the best out there at testing, comparing and reviewing cameras and lenses. Even someone like Michael the Maven, who puts in a tremendous effort with his comparisons, doesn't do truly real world reviews. He shoots "set up" scenarios. A girl jogging on a field is nothing like a bunch of overlapping people moving erratically and competing for a ball (and competing for the camera's AF attention at the same time). I love the way you demonstrate that almost any camera can get the job done, while other reviewers try to convince us we need the latest and greatest camera to capture a good shot, which is utter nonsense. Your efforts are truly appreciated.

[@jarlathmcnee3833]

I bought the Sigma today, I am definitely a beginner level and have two cropped cameras, my original Rebel t7i which I loved to learn on, and now my Canon 90d. This is the one I will be using with the lens. I have being doing some wildlife and outdoor desert shooting so I bit the bullet and added the 70-200mm 2.8 to my bag. Like you the store guy who has the Canon couldn’t justify the extra $600 for my level and needs. Thank you the video did calm me down after dropping a lot of money!!

[@bilcarter]

Jared - Awesome video, as usual. I have an EOS R with the EF adapter. I'm looking at getting the Sigma 70-200 with the 2x extender. Any concerns for image quality with all this on the camera at once?

[@b00gzzz]

I'm in the same boat and would like to know as well!

[@carbon6372]

The lenses from the EF mount should work natively on the RF mount when using a native EF to RF adapter. What will you use this combination for, especially with the extender? I would never recommend a 2x extender. If you need the also reach, get another lens, use a 1.4x or crop a bit. If it’s for sports, you might be better with a Sigma 120-300mm S or Canon 300mm f/2.8L. If it’s for wildlife photography, I wouldn’t get anything less than 400mm. 70-200mm + 2x extender is not a good choice for wildlife photography. It would be better just going for the 100-400mm II or Canon 400mm f/5.6L.

[@Mario_1980]

Hi Jared: the question is: how does this Sigma compare to the Tamron 70-200 G2 ?????? Eager to know (please)

[@brandonbuckles826]

Thank you!! I feel like that comparison is way more useful since they're both new lenses, both third party and both at a similar price point

[@anthonyhall9453]

Jared & FroKnows Team, thanks for this comparison video. I pleased to hear that the big third party names are improving their offerings. Although the Sigma is heavier and has a larger filter thread size, Sigma gives 3-year warranty compared to 1-yr for Canon. QUESTION: Jared, are the buttons on the Sigma programable to toggle between AF Single and AF Servo or initiate the viewfinder level? Thanks in advance.

[@DaveSpitz]

I currently own the Sigma Sport and I absolutely love it!. I find it hard to believe that the Canon lens can produce better/sharper images. I think I might loan the Canon lens and try my own real life review

[@eddyjuillerat835]

Thanks man for the very detailed but non-boring analysis. I'm a big fan of Sigma on EOS but you're right, the focus on moving subjects is not easy. Sometimes I focus manually.

[@petegalindez9961]

I just bought the new Sigma to replace my old SIGMA which weighs in at 2lbs. 9oz. This new lens is a TANK! I don’t think I’ll keep it. It’s very unwieldy for the fast moving action of ice hockey. Now conflicted between this Canon lens or the RF Canon 70-200 as I’ve purchased and waiting for a CANON EOS R6 to arrive...Two concerns...price of the RF version ($2,700!) and the extending lens when zooming. It’s great to have in the bag to make it easier to carry, but often I have to take photos from behind the glass at games and use a rubber hood to press against the glass. If my lens is extending and retracting all the time, I’ll have to wear rollerblades to keep moving since I don’t want to push through the glass! So, I think I may have answered my own question..get the EF lens with the adapter and have fun.

[@karurosueth1265]

thank you so much for testing the sigma with the EOS R as I'm going to do the same for sports photos.

[@blayral]

I had the original 70-200 from sigma, always had trouble to get consistent focus on my 7D. I once rented the canon 70-200, non IS, mark I. consistent focus, sharpness even at 2.8. I kept my beloved sigma for 16 years (because heh, even if many shots were missed even if the af points were ok, i wont lie : i could manage to get nice pictures on a full event), but i moved to the canon mkIII version.

[@vedranb87]

14:20 I actually prefer the look as it is, you can see the hopes and dreams in the audience if you so choose to, and if it was a decisive moment in the game it would have been a really good thing to include. It's not distracting, there's a clear separation, but if you completely blow out the audience, what's the purpose of the game? The audience is an important part of team sports and a good component to include to contribute to the atmosphere of the photo.

[@mikew9788]

I brought the canon version 3 right when it came out and it is a great lens, but sigma is really stepping up their game.

[@cohoblue6512]

@Jared Polin .. i gotta say i really love your Reviews as there is no BS nor bias towards one Lens or the other just good honest feedback on how they perform in real world situations ..

[@willparsons32]

Hey Jared. Thanks for the enthusiastic video on this lens.. I shoot with the Crop lens of a 70D and have this lens. It's my first go-to lens since I purchased the Camera 4 years ago. Great lens!

[@carlosdias1940]

Hi, you mean the Sigma?

[@JohnHilario23]

Ok Jared. At 17:40, when I look through the viewfinder that single point focus marker isn’t differentiating between the eye and eyelash. I’m not sure I agree with that point. I wouldn’t see how you you could say YOU missed that focus by that little. I’d say the canon prolly hit a little better there.

[@davidshearer8621]

One critical point I’d love to see covered - how well the Warranty’s are covered and how quickly repairs are made.. Canon’s CPS Service is fantastic and often “on site” at major events. CPS is one major reason for some of the price differences in these products, and why you see so many real Pro’s are sticking with Canon. Coupled with their “loaner program”, their Pro Service means money in the bank.

[@hindermath]

I made my decision for a few weeks for the Canon in via Amazon and the Canon winter sale and get for 1870 € compared to price of 2300€ in the Canon online store. And it’s a great lens! I really enjoy the photos made with this lens.

[@albertoxvazquez]

I bought the Sigma 70-200 in early January I doubted myself for not buying the Canon 70-200. I couldn’t find very many if any video or written reviews on it. Just a bunch of content hyping it up. This video made me feel 10000x better about the purchase.

[@KennyRamasawmy]

Did the weight bothers you a lot? Am choosing between the tamron and sigma and I am still choosing between those 2😂

[@MicrowavedPimp]

This is an older video, so not sure if I will get a reply BUTT............ )) I have a Sony A7R4 and no where near the budget to get the Sony 70-200 lens. I have been waiting 10000 years for Sigma to bring out their 70 - 200 but there is no sign of it being released any time soon. (Unless you listen to Sony Rumors, who rumor it will be out this coming last decade ago) I'd love to take some quality Sports (Biking/Skiing etc) and Landscape photography but I don't know which cheaper glass to invest in? You have a video reviewing the 70-180 Tamron, but I'm not sure how that would cope in a sports environment (plus missing out on 20mm feels like it could be annoying) ((That's what she said)) Maybe I could buy the Cannon 70 - 200 F4 with an adapter, but that's still pricey and I might need that better 2.8 aperture in wood/shaded environments. OR The Sigma 70 - 200 2.8 with the Canon to Sony Adapter? Would the auto focus be fast enough? Do you have any future plans to help us mere miniscule money mortals? I would love a real world review so I could see what the best alternative options are.

[@gregmillstube]

Is there a review of the Sigma compared to the Nikon yet? Can’t wait and thank you!! Great stuff!

[@ramonperezsanchez]

Came back to this Video since I see a Sigma 70-200 close with good price... forget the glass.. I appreciate you being human and missing focus on the eye a few times and comming clean and saying.. it's not the lens.. that is why we follow you. Thank you Jared. keep it up!

[@xxanniexo7x]

Great review Jared! Based on this review and your knowledge, how do you think the Sigma would handle shooting concerts and live shows? Thx!

[@PatrickGratton]

First off great video! What are your thoughts on buying a lens for a newer photographer when trying to decide between the Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 EX DG OS HSM vs. Sigma 70-200mm f2.8 sport. My wife plans to use it primarily for video footage of our son playing lacrosse, but plans to use it for photos as well. The price point difference between the two appears to be around $600 to $800. Based on my research the sport has weather sealing and 11 aperture blades vs 9 blades on the EX, along with some other minor differences (lens length and diameter). Wondering if it makes sense to spend the extra money on the sport version as it would be primarily for sports. We plan on pairing it with a Canon EOS R10. Thanks for your input in advance!

[@rovleculina8237]

Just the review I needed. Thanks for the effort and putting this videos out, Jared, much appreciated!

[@3-piece129]

No editing at all? Wow. White balance? Vibrance? HSL? Nice pics. I've been curious about the EOS R in this type of setting (indoor sports). Thanks, i already have the Canon lens, just need the camera now.

[@lifesbeautiful3024]

Fantastic video, Jared! You were thorough and fair. And everyone knows that as Tony and Chelsea always say, “Canon glass is awesome!” Yet you make a great case for the Sigma and for a non-professional, that might be the way to go. Also loved the way you put the EOS R to work in Temple’s gym. Great photos!

[@SmallSpoonBrigade]

I think the main issue with Sigma has been that they haven't had the necessary access to get a similar level of integration. I personally haven't had issues with 3rd party lenses.

[@Frontdesk99]

Northrup. Is ANYONE still taking these guys seriously?

[@franqueee]

I can tell the canon is teeny tiny slightly sharper but with the price difference, its a no brainer to go for the sigma if you're on a tighter budget But i did found a used canon 70-200mm 2.8 with the same exact price with the sigma. In this case, should i go for the brand new sigma or a used canon?

[@DinoDraghi]

I was waiting for this video, since Nikon version just being released, would be great to see a real world review with that one against the nikon 70-200 versions VR versions. Anyone else agree?

[@warpspeed9877]

I don't get it! Why no steady studio or outside tripod shots to establish which renders best? How can a subjective view of their resolving performance be established at ISO 3200 and moving subjects in a dimly lit gymnasium? Speed of AF and ease of use ok but what about resolving power?

[@jcoldmoney]

This is such a hard decision. Do I save money and go for the Sigma or do I go with the lens that weigh less and easy zoom ring?

[@thierryferrando7663]

As usual, fantastic review. You give all keys to do the best choice, thanks. 600$ cheaper but 300g heavier than the canon III that’s the question. We have to consider also the old canon version II which is very good too.

[@SmallSpoonBrigade]

Also keep in mind that these are high end lenses, you're not likely to be replacing them unless they're destroyed, stolen or you switch systems. Over the course of a career, or even just hobby, the cost of a lens of this price isn't that much. Back in the days of film when you had to be paying per shot, you could easily hit this kind of cost in a couple years if you were doing a lot. Developing, even at home, isn't the cheapest thing in the world.

[@toddswain7459]

Not sure where you're located but it's great to see ECU in action! Thank you for that. Also enjoyed the thorough and informative review.

[@JonPaulKersey]

I love Jared’s content! Always quick to the point and he explains everything with perfection. Solid content! I give this a 10 out 10. His podcast are dope too! A real person, doing real quality content! My go too!

[@steveduarte1348]

I am looking on purchasing a 70 - 200 my students I am looking for the best bang for my buck. Canon, Tamron, Sigma. It would be used primarily for sports.

[@guillemcasanova7042]

Hey man, congrats on your work! From this day I will follow your videos. I think you explain yourself so clear and your tests and knowledge are so helpful. I think I'll go with the Sigma, I'm used to carry weight in my photography journeys in the mountains. ;)

[@fatbat808]

Jared outstanding breakdown! Thanks for taking the time to provide such detail analysis it helped with figuring out which one I am getting.

[@RalphRaphaelPhotog]

Better is relative at this point! Now this might not matter to you if you upgrade your gear every year but the one thing with 3rd party lenses is reliability. How will the lens perform 6 months later after purchase How often do i have to calibrate that's really where the main difference is. Reliability and longevity

[@amandaparotte]

This is probably a dumb question but I currently have a canon 5D mark 3, I would love to upgrade to a mirrorless canon or Sony in the future (late 2024). until then I have to buy a 70-200 mm lens and these are the two I am debating between. If I get this lens for my current canon will it work on the Sony Mirrorless camera if I choose to go with Sony instead on canon? Thank you for your help.

[@FauxtakuLounge]

Quality work. And excellent showcase of how a non-sports camera like the R can do it when being used properly.

[@danielvisscher3152]

Jared love your videos. I seeking a 70-200 for my Nikon, I Can not Chose betweetster the Tamron one or the Sigma one. In one video (baseball) you testen the tamron one and in a video (basketball) you tested the sigma. You never tested this thirdparty lensjes in one test. I’m looping for a good pinnsharp lens (thirdparty). Can you help me chose? Regards Daniel (Netherlands) and I shoot RAW ;)

[@bahaatamer1245]

I'm still a student, looking to make money to invest in this hobby. Guess I'll stick with the Sigma for now

[@bala1000mina]

Very helpful as always! Thank you so much Jared!

[@joshuaprietophoto]

Always respect your lack of bias when looking at gear Jared. Good review. Both pretty incredible lenses, the Sigma is astounding for the price. I have a Canon 6D Mark ii and think it is pretty remarkable for the price

[@roth1998]

Great review. Ok- so between Tamron G2 and this Sigma Sport, which would you choose?

[@froknowsphoto]

It's super hard to say. The Tamron is lighter and less expensive. The Sigma is larger and a few bucks more.....

[@Savage1776_]

OK Canon 70-200 Version 2 or Sigma Art Sport.. they are both the exact same price right now if I was to buy one today. Which one is better? All around better lens?

[@franciscoxie]

Should I buy Sony A7 iii right now or wait for A7 S3? When S7 will be released and what’s the price will be?

[@anthonyhershko]

Great video as usual! I got the Sigma 70-200 f2.8 ex os hsm on my old Canon 6D and I'm happy with the result.

[@crayshaunhenderson1265]

how you're doing i just got my canon 80d and i want a good zoom lens like the sigma 70-200 and it's all black and i see it takes great pictures. i want a few lens but i don't want to kill my pockets you understand. but i'm in love with sigma products and plus it's cheaper than canon. i guess those photographers can buy them cause they get paid i do this for fun and i want to be good at what i do ya see.i want to get this 70-200 f2.8 over the canon 55-250 so i want your opinion i'm going to buy the 18-35 sigma lens the 35mm 1.4 sigma lens and the 70-200 that's a good combination right? i was thinking 24-105 and the 24mm pancake lens and my collection is complete

[@atbsigma]

One little thing you didn’t touch on but I think makes a difference... all of these cameras *nailed* the skin tone on these players. Yes darker skin is tougher to shoot but I’m willing to bet you didn’t do any EV adjustments. Both lenses and cameras handled it very well. All of your other points are solid and it does matter that you can flat out shoot. In the hands of a newbie they may see the difference with the weight and handling of the Sigma vs. the Canon. Plus the psychological effect of spending $2k on a lens makes it seem to perform better overall. Your review cut right though that. Great vid!

[@artmaltman]

Excellent real world comparison, thanks for doing this! Please do always test for focus breathing, especially in zooms. Does the magnification change at 200mm when moving focus from far to near? Sigma and Tamron have some history of fairly extreme focus breathing in their zooms. Nikon's old version II 70-200mm had extreme focus breathing. In practice this matters to some photographers a lot and to others very little. Worth measuring though. Thank you.

[@KlOis69]

nice review and thx for testing on the eos R

[@djjamminjimlawton6365]

This has helped me a great deal in my choice of lenses. Thank you. I have the Canon 6D MK II, and plan to purchase the Sigma 7--200 F2.8 as I see no drawbacks between the Canon and the Sigma, and the Sigma is much less expensive.

[@TheSlevin18000]

Sigma sport 2.8 70-200 or Canon RF 70-200 2.8? What is the best ?

[@guydube448]

Honestly like you said, these are two greats lenses. It depends on the personal choice of the buyer. Like me, my equipment is Canon since always. Thank you Jarod for all your tecnical informations, I never miss one! Have a nice day! Guy

[@Yankeededandy62]

Thanks Jared, I found this very helpful. I bought the Sigma and use it on the EOS RP. It works fine and the images are as super sharp as you say, the bokeh is nice and the weight is actually ok. I found the autofocus to be sluggish though and I'm still contemplating, if I can live with that, but probably will, because the image quality is so fantastic and the price is right.

[@damjanstijovic1208]

Slugish???? 4 real... Fist time i read this???

[@Yankeededandy62]

@@damjanstijovic1208 Yes, that was my impression. I traded it for the Tamron a week later and found it worked better with the autofocus. But that's just me.

[@damjanstijovic1208]

@@Yankeededandy62 now you really scared me 😔

[@Yankeededandy62]

@@damjanstijovic1208 Just try it. You don't have to rely on my comment. I didn't do scientific testing.

[@damjanstijovic1208]

@@Yankeededandy62 i would if i could 😔

[@TerryBoydon]

Just picked up a demo Sigma 70-200 f2.8 (sport) with an Mc-11 to play with (thank you Sigma) looking forward to taking it out for a test run...

[@jquintero_94]

If you have to pick one between the sigma and the tamron, which one would you prefered?

[@ZaberAnsaryOfficial]

I would've like to see some real world photos during daylight where they were shot in 100-400 ISO, Also some video AF examples would be nice.

[@jeepjoseph9036]

Af motor is in body

[@PASquared]

Jared, you should do a comparison between 70-200 2.8 Tamron G2, Sigma Sports, or Nikon VR2. G2, Sports and used VR2 are all very similar in price, once the Sigma for Nikon is released

[@KennyRamasawmy]

Hi jared, i'd like to know how it compares to the tamron please? I am choosing between them for 2 months now and still don't know which one. The weight of sigma somehow matters but a lot of people had problems with the tamron in long term

[@waeel550]

Hey You haven't done a comparison between this sigma lens and Nikon 70-200 2.8G yet, have you? I really looking forward to it

[@v0ldy54]

Good lens. I'd probably still pick the Canon out of the two because it's a warranty it's gonna do well, on the Nikon side however seeing the price I'd pick the Sigma

[@marutirtha]

Do you think Tamron or Sigma better as of today for Canon use

[@vizmatter]

It seems the biggest complaints from those that have purchased and reviewed their Sigma lenses through Amazon, Adorama, B&H is the inconsistency of quality control. Some copies are better than others. I'd like to see some lab testing with different focus charts, particularly with Sigma, for resolution, aberration and vignetting. For the budget minded this would be a good start, or Tamron.

[@froknowsphoto]

I don't do lab testing.

[@thesharpercoder]

Why do people complain about the 6D2 AF points being “clustered”? When you ask what AF point they use they will say that they only use the center AF point when shooting in Single Shot mode. Even when they use AI Servo tracking in a Canon body, still they only use the center AF point and the surrounding 4/8 AF points as AF assist points.

[@mactaduyo9318]

Great review its so detailed and realistic! I allways love your reviews and kodus to your team for the hard work God bless you Fro!....

[@rvboondocker2559]

Thanks Fro. I went to two different stores today and just about put down my money to take the Canon home but thought I would watch a few more videos and came across this one. $600 is a big difference. I only want to buy it once. Ultimately, I think we justify what we want anyway but I do like other Sigma products that I have or have had. At the end of the day, using it with my SkyGuideer Pro, the lighter weight does make a difference and I will probably get back in my car and go by the Canon anyway. Seems like the sharpness, clarity, and noise were better with the Canon.

[@willparsons32]

I own the 70-200 mm sigma 2.8 Non IS and although it's an oldy, it still stands its ground!! Great lens made by a great manufacture! I still don't understand why ppl would spend the colosal $$ on a red circle!

[@KevKevAllen]

Needing a 200mm for portraits, I was looking at the Canon, Tamron, and Sigma. The Tamron was in the lead for a while until I saw comparison images and noticed the Tamron has MASSIVE focus breathing at 200mm. The Sigma has virtually none, so now it’s between Sigma and Canon.

[@EmoEmu]

Sigma has a strange fascination with making their gear HEAVY. Even here they give their lens a bigger front element than everyone else - likely to improve corner sharpness and vignetting. Personally I'd prefer not to break my back carrying it around, but that's going to be a highly subjective thing. Good to have the option I guess.

[@SmallSpoonBrigade]

With modern cameras, you can usually fix the vignetting during raw conversion. Having that larger lens does cause issues that are more of a pain than running a filter to fix the vignetting.

[@ThatRandomCh1ck]

How does this new Sigma 70-200 f/2.8 DG OS HSM | S compare to the ~10 year old Sigma APO 70-200mm F2.8 EX DG OS HSM? Are the results comparatively that it's worth it to save more for the newer one?

[@2mitts]

That zoom ring placement on the Canon is a big deal for me. Like you, using just my thumb to follow a player coming right at you is so much more comfortable and controllable. That being the case, I'm curious why you think manufacturers will start to move the zoom ring to the outside?