Fundamentals of LPVOs: Cheap vs Expensive

[@ichewtoast111]

The firearms community needs more blunt honesty like this

[@johnsanko4136]

I appreciate Mike's blunt honesty.

[@ElChris816]

Exactly. Completely transparent in every product video and honest about the differences. It's really nice to hear.

[@fire304]

This is a video that all of us need to watch.

[@GreenBlueWalkthrough]

It's the kind that comes with experience and humbleness... Great to see.

[@blakerogers6806]

I don’t know who this man is, but that’s how you get business. Extremely informative, honest, and practical.

[@eamonia]

No doubt. I wanna buy his stuff just based on that.

[@wyorca]

His open honesty on how “the sausage is made” is some of the best marketing I’ve seen in a long time.

[@tomwinterfishing9065]

It’s the best way. Integrity.

[@wolfsworkshop9095]

well, people are usually more willing to pay for cheaper stuff if they understand why it is cheaper (or expensive for that matter)

[@jong2359]

Yeah, I really like this guy... I would buy some of his glass just because he is being honest.

[@patrickw9520]

​@@tomwinterfishing9065truth.... makes me respect him as a person, and a company. It's like the old school toyota approach from the 80s. I seriously would have never given his brand much consideration them being relative newcomers. This video, and his integrity and honesty, I def will be checking his line out.

[@QuintusAntonious]

@@jong2359 I'm definitely going to pick up one of his red dots.

[@kodiakkeith]

Related reason to go with an LPVO: hunting in bear country. I spent much of my life on Kodiak (1 brown bear per square mile) and was an avid blacktail deer hunter. When hunting we saw bears nearly every day, and just learned to avoid them. I used a typical 3x9 scope until the day everything went wrong. Browns and grizzlies are ambush predators. When they decide to attack (which is rare), they sneak in very close and rush you from downwind (they don't know we can't smell them) at 25 mph. That happened to me one day and when I swung my rifle the bear was within 10 or 15 yards and I was blind. I had less than one second to sort that out and failed. I didn't even pull the trigger before it bowled me over and really messed me up. My partner ran up and also blinded by a high power variable point-shot a .300 Mag round into the animal's torso, it then turned and ran at him and he got another blind shot into it from the front, which finally turned the animal. I was a mess, lucky to survive and nearly bled out before a CG helo airlifted me to town. It was two years before I was healed up enough to hunt again, and when I finally got back out in the bush I was sporting a simple Burris 1x4 optic. I kept my rifle on 1X while hunting, and if I needed magnification dialed it up, took the shot and went back to 1X. I'm convinced that if I'd had a 1X optic I'd have gotten off that one critical shot that might have turned the bear, or even tumbled him before he reached me. That was 25 years ago and 1X4 (and maybe 1X6?) was all that was available. It's nice to see the advances in LPVO scopes. If you hunt in brown or grizzly country, this is the style of scope you want.

[@donwyoming1936]

Kind of why I carry bear spray on my right hip. I've stopped charging brown bears with just a puff.

[@geronimo5559]

What a story. I am glad you are still here to tell it. Greetings from a hunter in europe that has only roe deer in his area.

[@Joe-hz1nw]

@@donwyoming193644 magnum revolver with heavy cast bullets at the ready if I’m in that heavy of bear country

[@jameshealy4594]

​​@@Joe-hz1nw stats show bear spray is hugely more effective but sure, carry what you like

[@mahbuddykeith1124]

@@jameshealy4594Why not both?

[@jeffscherer2136]

Dude has earned my business with honesty about a product.

[@qqnqqpart]

I appreciate his honesty regarding red dots (in another/a different video) where he mentioned Holosun was a year/generation in front of the competition due to them being a division of an optics company I'll not discount Gideon if I ever buy a red dot but will compare them with Holosun's offerings more closely..

[@catmandoo4u1]

he's full of it.

[@declineofthewest.]

Math is now racist.

[@iamscoutstfu]

Gross

[@sjs9698]

@@catmandoo4u1 how so? please elaborate?

[@bec6143]

Mike is an extremely effective communicator. The blunt honestly of what he knows and what is products can do is very refreshing.

[@markfergerson2145]

And his honesty about what it *can’t* do and why. I like that he got into the weeds of application vs cost without getting into the deeper weeds, even counting the insert of the basic math of the physics of magnification. That was relatively painless for those of us who don’t math. That’s the kind of thing that makes us think about “do I really need to spend that extra grand *to do what I want or need to do” which a lot of people don’t really consider.

[@PSUK997]

Yep. I work in sales selling the most frivolous, needless product to people with too much money. This guy nails it. To honest, authentic, transparent and being able to admit your products faults (and strengths) is so basic yet seldom seen.

[@24kachina]

Gun Jesus has had a lot of fantastic, informative guests, but none better, more knowledgeable, or transparently honest than this gentleman. Gideon sounds like a sweet price point for basic practical shooting and hunting. Gonna look into one of their sights for my son's AR.

[@mrkdwld]

Webster should put a picture of Mike up in the definition of 'NO BS'. So refreshing to see this obviously very knowledgeable industry guy dispelling myths with pure truth.

[@Baranoth]

Talking about his glasses hit too close to home 😂

[@tngtacticalmiata1219]

No kidding.... I took mine off and looked at my lenses when he said that.... ouch...

[@fire304]

Yup. I truly wish I could find glass glasses...

[@frosty3693]

@@tngtacticalmiata1219 And you have to find the spot on the glasses lens that has the focus point you need for the scope, in addition to the scratches and smuges.

[@warrenharrison9490]

Me and my progressive cut lenses 😬

[@scottorgan2255]

You can get them BUT they are to heavy for me the last time I had glass lenses they were expensive and uncomfortable to wear I hated them they will give you the look of a nerd think professor Farnsworth that was me before I had cataract surgery LOL

[@leppeppel]

This is how you sell a product. No razzle-dazzle, no chest-thumping; just brutal honesty and infectious enthusiasm.

[@TheVrocco]

Never has a guy saying "my stuff isn't as good as my competitors" so motivated me to buy an optic from that guy as in this video.

[@snipersl270]

I love this guys honesty. "Its not just as good, but its probably good enough for you"

[@leewilkinson6372]

Do you know what's hilarious about this? His honesty will win everyone! Poors like me will look into his companies stuff. Snobs will feel vindicated buying high end. He's selling everyone!!! Lmao😂

[@hallovelo2478]

This is true for many peole. If they don't know what they pay for and how to check a glass about it's quality. It does not make a difference if it is a microscope, a camera objectiv a rifle scope or whatever. If the lense quality is not good your eye will get fatigue much more early than with a very high quality glass. For example, the lens of the much loved Razor gen 3 is not ground round. Check it against a wall or object with a lot of lines or against text and start to move it. You wil recognize the lense is full of "flat spotes". Does this mean we have to buy a 2500+$ scope? Definitly not, but there are huge differences that will/can have a big impact on your ability to shoot over a long and sometimes also over a shorter time at the range. Check your budget, check the scopes in your budget class, check one class below and one above to see if you are happy with what you want/can invest. Better than figure out a bit later that it just would have needed a little bit more money to be way more happy. Better safe on the rifle than on the scope. The rifle is way less important than the scope. And everything is less important than know how to build a shooting position and pull the trigger. If you want to learn this, buy a 22lr and learn to shoot 22 prone rifle. If you are able to shoot consistent 96+, you know the fundamentals about shooting a rifle. The best thing about it, it's super cheap!

[@geraldholt2755]

I was really sketch on Gideon until this video. I'm gonna buy an optic from them now just because of this guy.

[@TheFanatical1]

It's always refreshing to have a guest speaker approaching forgotten weapons with the correct attitude: a frank discussion of the technical capabilities and limitations of the gadget that happens to be on the table. Too often the SHOT show people have a pitch that they've rehearsed. Nothing wrong with a rehearsed pitch, of course (rehearsing is good!) but it doesn't sound like this guy is pitching me anything, and that's the best pitch you'll ever hear in your life.

[@tropictiger2387]

I like this guy, if he made a youtube channel explaining optics concepts or doing reviews or whatever I would definitely be watching.

[@markfergerson2145]

Yeah, but that would take some of his time away from designing and honestly I’d rather he do that, and not just because that’s what he really loves doing.

[@kevinlytle6215]

I am in technical sales engineering and truly appreciate the honesty and the ability to call out his competitors not for his gain but to defend their higher prices. Quality counts until it isn't of benefit by finding that balance between affordability, your ability to use the extra quality and getting the features that are fit for the mission.

[@VitaminsB1212]

Translation = it's a decent scope at a nice price point. It will perform 90% as well as the top tier optics but cost a fraction of the cost

[@METALLIFY16]

You didn’t hear a word he said lol.

[@pkt1213]

It's more like, does the exact same job as high end LPVOs 98% of the time. There are reasons to buy a $3k optic, but is that relevant to you.

[@musicman1eanda]

​@@pkt1213 I got a Razor 1-6(e) on sale for $999 brand new. In guessing past that quality you're getting greatly diminishing returns.

[@2A.Freedom]

That's not true at all. My Kahles blows all my sub 1k lpvos out of the water at all points. It's not even close.

[@sjs9698]

@@2A.Freedom ok, sure, but can i assume you're an experienced marksman? or are you a noob like me?

[@nathan_k]

24:57 - I think Mike has shown he has earned the royal crown as "The King of Poors" at this point. He really, really makes his point and defends it clearly. That there is indeed such a thing as "Poor Pride". He has a crown, and wears it well. This entire interview series has been extremely humbling.

[@mtnbound2764]

there needs to be a middle ground, stuff that costs a few xtra buck, a few hundred, not a few thousand, that is better than the chinese amazon / wish junk, that is reliable enough for the average person, but affordable. thats what he is targeting, also psa and primary arms too.

[@Woodnymph304]

​@@mtnbound2764 that's mid tier. It's the sweet spot for civilians imo. Big mid tier names are like bcm, Midwest industries, primary arms glx line, the nicer holosun stuff. Nothing unnecessarily fancy, but all trustworthy and quality.

[@mtnbound2764]

@@Woodnymph304 aero and ballistic advantage too

[@evanmorris1178]

But the cheerful enthusiasm!

[@GideonOptics2023]

I saw this comment and internalized it, and thought about it, and well... alright then. King of the Poors is still king of somethin'. Makes me think of the Laurence Fishburne character from the John Wick movies. I proudly put on my kingly robe of tee shirts and blue jeans and announce "somebody PLEAAAASSE, get this man a scope!" --Mike

[@carwynvan]

I love your interviews with this guy. I've met so many "experts" (in a completely different field) that you try to talk on a topic with and it just turns into a sales pitch of "our thing is soooo much better because xyz" "buy our thing instead because it does ABC and the competition does DEF". This guy is just straight up talking on the topic and only every now and then talks about his goods when relevant!

[@Michael-im1vc]

Mike's comments at the end of the interview re: 2A, availability, and snobbery were bang on! Best part of the vid in my opinion. Thank you Ian and Mike. 👍🏻

[@johngalt176]

You had me at "in the realm of diminishing returns". All kidding aside, this level of honesty from a very knowledgeable person is refreshing.

[@GreenCanoeb]

I love these interviews. Mike is an enthusiastic engineer that can explain optics at a level the layman can understand without apparent bias.

[@johnanon6938]

He's great at discussing all these optical stuffs, really knows the products and very upfront about what is what. Two thumbs up!

[@sparkywilson1405]

accurizing your firearm is a rabbit hole. diminishing returns apply like anything else. and it's all kind of moot if your gun can outshoot you. at some price point, food stops tasting better and they're just slapping gold leaf and caviar on everything because some people want whatever has the highest price tag just to flex.

[@roflchopter11]

Meh, if a shooter can shoot a laser beam (0/MOA rifle) at 4 MOA, their groups wirh a 4MOA rifle will be something like 8 MOA (slightly less, but then you have to actually measure and do the math on the random distributions). They're still better served by the 0 MOA rifle. It isn't until the shooter is several times less accurate than the rifle that the returns really drop off.

[@jagerdergroe8604]

​@@roflchopter11 you're exactly the guy the comment described.

[@leewilkinson6372]

Well sort of. If you have a 2 moa rifle, with a person willing to put in the work to learn to shoot it at 2 moa..... You're getting a better result for less money, generally speaking. I think the biggest "bang for your buck" is learning to shoot the rifle you have. Everything else is just "icing" on the cake.

[@roflchopter11]

@@jagerdergroe8604 I shoot 3gun with a M&P sport 1, so not really.

[@userJohnSmith]

​@@roflchopter113 gun is hardly a precision game...

[@joshuabrooks8044]

I know its been said, but this is the most refreshing guy I've ever seen. I work in a corporate-esq environment, and I have tried to get them to understand the respect sheer honesty instills. They're more concerned with looking perfect...

[@Maddog3060]

If I hadn't just bought an LPVO I would consider getting one now from this man due to his straight talk.

[@davidhelmuth6654]

This conversation is what everyone really needs. Truthfully honest! The end was soo funny. I went into service in the mid 80’s. My “Door kicker” gun is way better that most guns I had access to when I was in.

[@theREALdingusMD]

Ian, you should invite Mike for a proper gather ‘round the camp fire.

[@MagicPrepper]

I greatly appreciate the practicality of these conversations. It's really good information that the community needs to hear rather than relying on affordability bias or bravado. Thank you.

[@bobjordan8283]

It's so refreshing to see a manufacturer tell you the good the bad and the ugly about their products and compare them to other products without bad mounting the competition! I've learned a lot about optics that I thought I knew just by these few videos that Gun Jesus has had him on! That being said more please!

[@danielboudreau8404]

Hey Mike, you dropped this: 👑

[@scousewillo62]

Some of the best and informative content about LVPO's I have watched.

[@ComiCBoY000]

This gentlemen has been very interesting to listen to over the last few video's. I hope we see and hear more from him in the future. Cheers.

[@ETC_Rohaly_USCG]

I really respect his honesty

[@RobertBeckk]

In addition to what everyone else said about mike, I really appreciate when people give credit where credit is due. mike mentioning Primary arms really makes me like mike. Kudos to you.

[@aigtbootbp]

Keep it up Mike, you give a very refreshing honest perspective on modern optics and firearms. 4MOA was good years ago. Now a cheap homebuilt AR can give 1MOA accuracy and of course optics quality is light years ahead and is racing forward every year still.

[@BenLJudy]

I really liked the commentary about the guy who spent years getting a guccied up rifle. It's the classic case of skill being more important than equipment in a lot of cases. Sure, equipment can give an edge, but you gotta get there first.

[@jamescherney5874]

I agree 100 per cent with this guy. I discovered IJK optics that sells 1 st focal plane and other scopes for a fraction of what Leupold, Nightforce etc. cost. They have performed excellent for target and hunting. The illuminated reticals work great for night varmint hunting. Don't waste your money unless you' re filthy rich.

[@forghy]

So informative!! I'm pretty sure I'll never need an LPVO or an optic or even a gun, but the wealth of knowledge and passion of Mike Branson is really captivating. He most definitely is one of the best guests of this channel.

[@ktate2002]

Mike is a treasure. He’s genuine and honest.

[@ColtGuthrie]

This guy is so refreshing to listen to, and clearly has a huge amount of passion for his field.

[@jarink1]

I love the mention that training is more important than Gucci equipment. I would push back ever-so-slightly for brand new shooters, though. They need to make sure that cheap gun /mount/optic isn't total trash, broken, or shot out. Otherwise they could get frustrated and quit training or stop shooting altogether. 22LR is great for training and there are lots of affordable but great pistols and rifles that will do a great job of building skills and confidence without breaking the bank.

[@theKashConnoisseur]

Brand new shooters will get tons of benefit from dry fire training, which they can do successfully even with cheap guns, mounts, and optics that aren't zeroed. Even the bargain bin guns are functional these days, and you probably won't find my brand new firearms that are shot out from factory, so mount and optic quality are the main barriers to repeatable accuracy, not taking skill into account.

[@bunrudge]

These are my absolute favorite videos on Forgotten Weapons. Mike Branson is awesome, and Ian asks all the right questions.

[@starfortin96]

Love the honesty and logic

[@michaelwhite9199]

This gentleman is great. His frankness is refreshing.

[@kensmith7567]

Great video - thanks to Mike for a refreshingly honest discussion.

[@gottroubletactical]

The fireams industry needs more guys like this.

[@86AW11]

I rock a UTG 3-9X32 1 on a AR47. For the money and it's required use it is fantastic. This dude is awesome as well. Honest and builds what people want for a price they want.

[@jake4194]

I love this guys honesty, im going to have to check his optics out now!

[@onebadhamster]

Quite possibly the best, most transparent take on LPVOs I’ve seen. Well done Gentlemen!

[@mrnukeduster]

What a pleasant honest and knowledgeable fellow. Thanks for sharing your interview with him.

[@monkofbob]

If Mike started a KZbin channel I would subscribe. I don’t even really care about the content, just his attitude

[@myronalcock4716]

More from Mike please. Maybe get a bottle o' moonshine for a Q/A about firearms in general. Appeciate his insights, they apply to more than firearms!

[@fuxl100]

I hope you have more content to come with Mike! These are great!

[@leoa4c]

I like his honest market strategy. He's not pretending that his product is better, he's not pretending that you can get better or equal results with his products. He's basically saying "I have the right product for you if this is the product that you are looking for", no more, no less. I think that such posture is likely to give him a good size, loyal customer base, and one which he deserves, because to find an honest salesman these days?! Very much a virtually extinct species. Only a handful of them left in the wild.

[@bobbie4862]

Listening to this dude is seriously refreshing.

[@anon_laughing_man]

This is the most openly honest dude in the entire scope industry. No joke.

[@markpileggi643]

Love his honesty. Will be checking out Gideon in the future.

[@danielwarren8539]

Love his honesty. Especially about sending US jobs overseas.

[@vicdiaz5180]

Well, when the US government is raising taxes on small businesses, I don’t blame him either. You Have to cut cost somewhere or you will be going out of business

[@justinmoe3171]

One of the ways to cut costs, is to cut labor costs, as unethical as it sounds. Is it ideal? No, but for what he’s aiming for, it’s the best way to go about it

[@BenG1776]

This is one of the best product interview videos I've seen. I love the in-depth discussion. I bet if Ian did more product development videos whoever he's talking to would really step up their game compared to what you usually see

[@Patrick-857]

This guy is cool. I love how passionate he is. He's absolutely right too.

[@CDOES]

I worked with Mike for a very brief time. What a true gentleman! Thanks for the great video Ian.

[@damiangrouse4564]

“Buy once cry once” has a place but, the “stop beign Poor” statement is always out of line. Honest Dude I wish him all the luck

[@theKashConnoisseur]

"Buy once cry once" vs "Better to have it and not need it than to need it and not have it".

[@thalastian_thundercleese]

I know sweet f.a. about scopes, the technology and terminology, and a lot of this went over my head; BUT it's fascinating because of how Mike explains it all. Even if I don't understand what something is, he explains how and why it is or isn't important, so I can still understand the shape of what he's talking about - even if he loses me in some details. Props to him - he'd make a great educator!

[@aaronburns7477]

Awesome interview! Loved his reaction to the PA getting the DOE contract.

[@baikal9268]

Always a pleasure to listen to someone truly knowledgeable and passionate about a field i know so little about, this guy's great!

[@314299]

Once again, a super interesting guest and topic. Thanks!

[@docmoreau7540]

Oh, this guy again, I love his explanations!

[@RagingRaven108]

Truglo has the best budget lpvo. You can get it in 1x4 1x6 or 1x8. The 1x6 is sub 200 dollars and the glass is clear, it has locking calibrated turrets, illumination, and accurate mil dots and the 1x magnification is true. You can use it like a red dot. Weighs the same as the vortex strike eagle. Definitely worth looking into if you want a cheap scope for your cheap gun.

[@edbecka233]

I use a 1-6 Strike Eagle on my M5 clone, and when I built a 450 BM AR I got the 1-4 TruGlo for it. Frankly, the TruGlo is "just as good" for my purposes, and if I buy another LPVO I'll definitely be checking out the Gideon with the TruGlo as a fall-back option.

[@lzxray6781]

I really like Mike, he's a straight shooting, down to earth working man doing his thing so we can enjoy and exercise our rights. Thanks for introducing him to us Ian!

[@CByers-lh3zq]

I would definitely like to see more interview content with Mike, he is such an interesting, knowledgeable, and agreeable fellow to listen to. Appreciate you taking the time to get his take on a few topics during your busy Shot Show run through. 👍

[@Starless85]

This dude is an absolute gem.

[@toysoldier6093]

Mike is awesome. These interviews have been surprisingly enlightening and thought-provoking.

[@corycarlson8712]

I will support ths guy as much as i can... THIS is the dude. Hes sold me on this scope.

[@SA-xf1eb]

Love the honesty. Great information.

[@Quality_Guru]

There is a misconception that if something is cheaper it is less quality than something that is more expensive. You have evaluate the value of the product on its performance. Many times you will experience diminishing returns on a more expensive solution. This was an eye opening experience for me regarding optics.

[@bountyhunterguideservice6355]

This man has read Mises and/or Rothbard. I also appreciate his honesty on the product. Great video Ian

[@touge242]

Next build I'm doing get Gideon glass. Such grounded integrity is so rare

[@NotFluplaxio]

Really good interview and from reading other comments it goes to show that people appreciate genuine honesty. Best marketing money can’t buy.

[@wesleytownsend8214]

Honestly is always refreshing from a vendor. Great work! I wish the very best of health and happiness to you all and your families!

[@nilescoyote4829]

What a great interview!

[@slovencleta]

See, this is why I paid several thousand on eye surgery so now I can't afford an ATACR but I can see all the flaws in my Venom 5-25.

[@michaelmeadii9394]

I love his honesty!!! You won't hear it often.

[@richardpowell4281]

I use a Vortex 3-9 for hunting and a 1-6 for general use. Both so far have been rugged excellent scopes. I'm not looking to be a scout sniper shooting people at 800 yards. I just need something that I can reasonably run in my house, in my local area, and expect it to work. And if it craps out on me I have backup irons.

[@joshuamccasland8180]

I really respect this guy for his honesty

[@matroxman11]

Mike seems super knowledgeable and humble, great video

[@earlthepearl3922]

I love this guy. He explains things really well.

[@martyhigby9911]

This is one the most honest conversations I've heard in the firearm community in a long time, thank you guys for this video!

[@nickl6929]

This guy seriously needs a forgotten optics section on this channel.

[@witmoreluke]

More Mike!!! Man, what a guy. I had never heard of Gideon before and had something else in mind for my rifle, but I'm going to give them a VERY strong look moving forward.

[@GianmarioScotti]

Another issue with polymer vs glass lenses is that polymers have a thermal expansion coefficient which is about two orders of magnitude higher than that of glasses and ceramics.

[@warrenharrison9490]

That's the major issue.

[@BarackLesnar]

They make firearm optics with plastic lenses?

[@JR-yn4cu]

@@BarackLesnarWell I know they make some reflex style red dots with polymer lenses. The Shield RMSc pistol red dot is one of those.

[@RonOhio]

Mike and Ian are some of the best spokesmen for the Second Amendment I have seen in years. True believers. I hope to see more of Mike.

[@KretinD]

The guys at gideon are awesome. A gideon will be my next optics purchase

[@Joe___R]

LPVOs are still your best option for an all-around rifle. Perfect for close-up work with enough magnification to reach out and touch something a few hundred yards away.

[@lukesokolowski7160]

"The scope is to help to see how much you missed by." Great line.

[@HamHapper]

Best beginner LPVO video ever

[@mholway72]

I purchased a Gideon based off the last video Ian and Mike did…and I’ve been pretty damn impressed so far. I’m 100% willing to give this LPVO a chance as well. Mike’s knowledge and salesmanship are impressive!

[@TheOsu22]

Literally just bought a Sig Tango 1-6, 300 bucks, going to the range today to zero it in.

[@sickvendetta9]

People can say what they want, I have one of those and a Vudu 1-10. That Sig is an EXCELLENT LPVO.

[@redactedname5038]

I bought one a few weeks ago to dip my toes into the LPVO world. Definitely a heavy optic, and the glass isn't anything to write home about, but the 1x is pretty solid. Definitely gonna buy a replacement, but it'd staying on the backup rifle.

[@79nastynatesfish]

I don’t really care for the sig 1-6. It’s not as clear as a pst gen 1 even. I’m just waiting to get another credo and I’ll replace it. It serves its purpose on my 300 blackout till I’m ready to swap

[@Crosshair84]

Good choice with 1-6x. I've always told people to only go 1-4x or 1-6x on a LPVO. The eye box is just too small to be practical.

[@michaelgreen7511]

Excellent video and some good info there. As he pointed out, most people don't understand or appreciate the capabilities of an LPVO, but I believe, more importantly, most don't understand the capabilities their rifle. If they did, they probably wouldn't buy an overpriced LPVO. We see this in our LPVO courses at GreenOps. His comment about competitors beating everyone with $400 LPVO, was classic. Everyone talks about the quality of the glass and the ability to hit targets at a distance, but forget that the AR/M4 is about a 500m rifle. Additionally, most folks using it will be shooting at a max of 100m. Manufacturers and shooters should be talking about the "variable" part of the LPVO and discussing capabilities at closer distances. In general, i recommend a Second Focal Plane (SFP) for those who are more inclined to use their carbine at closer range engagements because at the lower end of the magnification ranges an SFP is better. For those that are using it outside city limits a First Focal Plane (FFP), might be better. I'd say about 90% of folks just need an inexpensive SFP.

[@commandZee]

You gotta love Mike's candidness! He's becoming a bit of a youtube favorite.

[@ryanpeck6346]

I clicked on this as a random video far down the rabbit hole, and it’s the most informative video I’ve seen in a long time