Learn about AMD Precision Boost Overdrive: kzbin.info/www/bejne/eGixq4GfZt2LlZY Learn about AMD TDP and what it means: kzbin.info/www/bejne/qn2Ud2Cnoc6Gi80 Get the full charts from our latest CPU review (at time of publishing) over here: kzbin.info/www/bejne/qqDHoIufZr5ghqs
@exxor91082 жыл бұрын
This might sound ridiculous. But I suggest this: de-lid the 7950X, set the eco mode to 65w, and put it under LN2 to see how far the frequency goes.
@GamersNexus2 жыл бұрын
@@exxor9108 Delidding wouldn't make any difference at all if you're already under LN2
@StrehaBDC2 жыл бұрын
Can you put eco mode to be 125W manually somehow and test it ? I saw somewhere on forum that some guy put manually at 125W, he got almost same perfomance as stck (-+1-2%) but temps are between 70-75c undel load with nzxt x73
@qpumuJIbek2 жыл бұрын
Why u not testins AMD processor with AMD card with "AMD Smart Access Memory"? they says its +15% perfomance.
@PlaiSeek2 жыл бұрын
@@StrehaBDC You can find the PBO values for any TDP with a simple interpolation on the values provided by AMD for 65, 105 and 170W. Following this, I set my 7950X to 125W TDP with the PBO settings : PPT=169W, TDC=125A, EDC=187A , this gives acceptable thermals (80°C max with high end air cooling) and performances even closer to the stock ones. Adding a slight undervolt using the Curve Optimizer setting, performances are even better than stock, with a 30% energy saving! If targeting 125W TDP, 105 being 20 less than 125 and 65 less than 170: PPT = 142 + (230-142) * 20/65 = ~169W TDC = 110 + (160-110) * 20/65 = ~125A EDC = 170 + (225-170) * 20/65 = ~187A
@grantbaxter36692 жыл бұрын
Steve needs to let himself go on eco mode for a few days!
@pelonix2 жыл бұрын
Fr, Steve is crazy with power and running too hot 🔥
@TotesCray2 жыл бұрын
His RAGE is uncapped.
@zivzulander2 жыл бұрын
He should go to that cat sanctuary on Lanai that Dr. Ian Cutress went to (on his TechTechPotato channel a while back - "How to Pet 600 Cats"). Besides it being a cool haven for cats, it's on a Hawaiian island, so a great place to visit and unwind - and maybe visit the other islands as well.
@GeorgeD12 жыл бұрын
All the shouting, man...
@bubbledoubletrouble2 жыл бұрын
@Defective Degenerate Neither does being laid up in bed after collapsing from exhaustion, and in that scenario you have less choice in the scheduling.
@Zosu222 жыл бұрын
With all vendors pushing their products hard out of the box it seems opting in for efficiency is something that’s going to be more commonplace. These efficiency results bode well for Zen 4 mobile!
@twiggsherman36412 жыл бұрын
If you have 2 CPUs for the same price. One is less performance but more efficient, and one is less efficient but has more performance. The one with the most performance is going to outsell the one that's most efficient every time. "Efficiency" is almost exclusively an argument that a fanboy uses to defend their favorite brand when it falls short on performance. X is more efficient than Y, so X is a better per watt value. Meanwhile the rest of us are popping the IHS's off our CPUs and using liquid metal to run more power through them.
@wassilia12342 жыл бұрын
@@twiggsherman3641 efficiency is as important as performance because it creates headroom to rise performance by more power consumption
@YttriumtYcLief2 жыл бұрын
@@twiggsherman3641 For some users that's certainly the case, but not everyone. I'll happily take a 6% (at worst!) performance hit if it reduces total power consumption - which directly relates to both heat output, and electricity bill - by 40%. That's a nutty trade-off. I fully respect enthusiasts wanting to push peak performance, even if they have to double their power (and heat) to reach it. Great for them! I'm enthusiastic about efficiency. I still want great performance, I just don't want a space heater in my room to get there.
@mduckernz2 жыл бұрын
@@twiggsherman3641 Well, ideally you want one that can do both! That way if you care not for the power use you can get max perf but if you care for power or heat production, you can still get good performance :)
@adr2t2 жыл бұрын
@@twiggsherman3641 You mean like when Intel did the same back in the day:)? Sorry, but power efficient is still a thing. Even if you have the highest performing SOC... if it runs at a blazing hot to cool - it wont matter because people will still see it has something that can't really afford if they're paying 100s of extra dollars just to run and cool it. There is also still the mobile half that does have to play the efficient game because of the battery limits we still have today.
@andyastrand2 жыл бұрын
Agree with those conclusions 105W definitely seems the way to go, but can we appreciate that chip in 65W mode managed to run all 16 cores at 4GHz and did it at only 19 degrees above ambient. That seems mad. The mobile versions of these chips are surely going to be monsters.
@mtunayucer2 жыл бұрын
These cpus should have launched with 105w tdp and 170w should have been optional. That would have given much better press and 95*c issue wouldnt have existed
@DJDocsVideos2 жыл бұрын
@@mtunayucer but YOU HAVE TO BE THE FASTEST... that's all the zombies care about.
@DigitalJedi2 жыл бұрын
Dragon range is supposedly going to be an around 60W TDP mobile chip with more than 8 cores. I wonder if they'll do something like a 7950HX that's basically the soldered version of this.
@dex63162 жыл бұрын
@@DigitalJedi dragon range is literally Ryzen 7000 desktop on mobile. The reason they can do this is because the IO die on Ryzen 7000 was built from the IO section of Ryzen 6000.
@arcknight_bk2o1832 жыл бұрын
Think of it like this - people used to overclock back in the days to get massive gains in performance but now, company's have pushed the cpu to limit, there is nothing left to over clock BUT you can undervolt your CPU massively to gain efficiency instead of power. This way, people who care about efficiency win, and people who care about mad performance also win
@Nerthym2 жыл бұрын
105W seems like no-brainer for code compilation for the sake of maybe less noise. Thanks for benchmaking this stuff.
@DanPellegrino4862 жыл бұрын
That is a really good point, noise is also highly affected with this as well!
@John__K2 жыл бұрын
Indeed, pretty sure i also prefer my cpu to be around 60C and not 95C lol
@ImInYourBrains2 жыл бұрын
@@John__K well,, we do need a psychological shift on that cause before 100C was the most chips could handle long term but Zen 4 design can handle up to like 115C so 95C on these chips is more like 80C on older chips and for all-core thats not bad at all.
@John__K2 жыл бұрын
@@ImInYourBrains That's nice to hear. However, 70~80C has been the long term safe~zone for cpus since like... forever. Lab tests that try to simulate endurance of decades(hopefully decades and not just 3-5 years) are not enough for me. I need actual time passing of 5+ years under such conditions to get convinced that this doesn't affect their longevity.
@user-bf5sc8pn8x2 жыл бұрын
Keep in mind that you don't get the same efficiency improvement shown near the beginning of the video for all workloads, i.e. for gaming there's probably no efficiency difference; they should've shown the average power consumption for each test alongside the performance numbers
@strat0caster1242 жыл бұрын
I understand that GN is usually looking at hardware from a more traditional sense, hence constantly reminding that "300MHz all core". But the reason why many people look at these ECO modes is that the thermals and system noise concerns overcome the significance of the performance. For me, it's not that you "lose 300MHz all core and that's a lot", but rather you "lose 6% of the core clock while reducing 50% power consumption". That's a truly impressive and disproportionate improvement. Personally, I care about these things because I am an ITX gamer nowadays, and there is a limited thermal budget for the system and a limited noise budget for my own sanity. My logic in looking at this is "what's the best performer at certain wattage that my cooling system can handle", and from that point, even a 20-30% weaker than stock 7950X is still within consideration. Although realistically, the best performance-to-cost ratio probably lies somewhere around a TDP limited 7700X or a 13700K for gaming.
@Wrenchingandnursing2 жыл бұрын
From a gaming standpoint, what's your reasoning for the 13700k over the 13600k? IMO the performance gain is negligible to the price difference, and the 13600k outperforms everything in the field in a gaming sense except the other 13 series, and they don't lead by an incredible amount either. I almost don't even understand why the 7's exist anymore, with the 13600k being 14 core 20 thread, and having impressive workbench capability anyways. Seems like if you really needed something more from a workbench standpoint, you would just get a 13900k or 7950x as nothing else really justifies the price to performance difference.
@guy_autordie2 жыл бұрын
not itx gamer, and I will take a 7700X @65/105W all day.
@Wrenchingandnursing2 жыл бұрын
@@guy_autordie I think that's a great option as well. If you are doing it for the noise and thermals that's great. With the price difference over a 13600k if it was done from a more energy saving standpoint you'd have to leave it on nearly 24/7 for a year or use it for a couple to negate the $100 difference.
@strat0caster1242 жыл бұрын
@@Wrenchingandnursing I just took 13700k as an example of something "not the flagship". I'm not that familiar with the 13th gen lineup, and the i5 may as well be more sensible than the i7 for gaming purposes with a limited power budget. I just vaguely remember that people were picking the 12700k as the sweet spot amongst the 12th gen lineup. I think the mid-range SKUs still have unique spots in this performance vs package power chart. Say we set a 65W power envelope, for the 7600X to the 7950X the average W/core decreases respectively. I think the peak performance per W probably lies somewhere around 6-9W/core like the 105W 7950X, so for a 65W limit the 7700X might make the most practical sense, in that you don't lose 30% of performance like you do for a 65W 7950X, but still has the thermals under control. But that's a very rough guess and might as well be wrong since CPUs work in very complicated ways, and we've seen that the games don't scale very well with these Ryzen core counts, so maybe a 45W envelope 7600X is all you need for the best overall price-gaming performance-noise experience for going AMD. Again I don't know too much about the Intel chips, but they seem to draw not that much power in gaming compared to some other workloads. My guess is that given a certain power limit, the 13700K might still be better than the 13600K, but maybe not by a huge amount, so the 13600K might as well be the most reasonable choice.
@klobiforpresident22542 жыл бұрын
I was going to build a sane system to replace my positively ancient 1700X. Now you make me consider an ITX system with a 7950X (or X3D as my timing permits) that's been power limited.
@Scarlet_Soul2 жыл бұрын
The eco modes are honestly what I've found most impressive about this generation of CPU's
@woswasdenni19142 жыл бұрын
living in europe dependent on russian gas for heating eco mode is not what we gonna use this winter xD
@adherry81422 жыл бұрын
@@woswasdenni1914 Electricity for Heat is still about 4 times as expensive as Gas. Paying 12 cent per kWh of gas vs 48 per kWh of Electricity.
@ChiquitaSpeaks2 жыл бұрын
Well it does make sense they say they keep increasing efficiency but the TDPs keep going up so something Has to start making sense
@tilapiadave32342 жыл бұрын
@@adherry8142 RUBBISH ,, PLEASE try and use your brain
@adherry81422 жыл бұрын
@@tilapiadave3234 Still 15 (gas) vs 47 cents per kwh here.
@gamergod91822 жыл бұрын
if you'd just adjust the PBO curve offset or PPT limits manually rather than using the Eco preset, I'm sure you can get results within 1-2% of the top results while still reducing power and thermals massively. also, remember that it's not always just about the cost of energy. being able to half the output of your 700 Watt "room heater" is a blessing during hot summers.
@vgamesx12 жыл бұрын
Probably, similar thing for older 3000 and 5000 series, where manually adjusting the limits can get you pretty close to stock performance while also getting most of the savings of eco-mode. Also don't forget about noise, not everyone has the nicest cooler and although they're much better these days the stock coolers are a bit noisy when they ramp up more than about 30-40%, so being able to maintain that more often is also a big benefit.
@Sunlight912 жыл бұрын
Americans are used to their air conditioning so they don't think about that.
@GameTimeWhy2 жыл бұрын
@@Sunlight91 lots of Americans do not have air conditioning.
@xeridea2 жыл бұрын
On 5800X, I can actually get higher than stock performance at slightly lower power with voltage offset. Probably similar with Zen 4.
@AFistfulOf4K2 жыл бұрын
Negative PBO curve offset seems stable for days then randomly gives me WHEA errors, it's not something a person buying for a workstation would want to use. One flipped bit might be hours or days of lost work.
@OneAngrehCat2 жыл бұрын
As a rule of thumb for all Zen 4, you can put ECO mode on with PBO and recover all your power, or just ECO mode alone at 50% of the stock power. You lose 5% of the top performance at worst and consume 50% of the power and gain dozens of degrees of thermals. It's a complete win for me. 7600x and 7700x -> 65W 7900x and 7950x -> 105W
@TheNerd2 жыл бұрын
Don't you think if that was the case, AMD would do it out of the Box or proudly announce it in marketing? What you descripe is an F1 Car towing away a truck. It's the same BS that most ppl in the PBO settings do: Turn on the Boost Clock override while using curve optimizer. Absolute *stupid bs* . Eco mode is a preset (for beginners), who do not know how PBO works. What you should do is leave ECO mode alone and just lower the max PPT (depending on the temps change TDC and EDC aswell) so you reach about 5-10% less max frequency. Getting more frequency out of a CPU on the right side of the voltage curve is *THE ULTIMATE* black hole of power consumption. That is why a lot of LN2 overclockers need >1600Watt PSUs while they try to beat world records.
@nguyenhanh94792 жыл бұрын
@@TheNerd most ppl like me just enable boost profile, pick xmp, enable sam and then move on.
@OneAngrehCat2 жыл бұрын
@@TheNerd I think AMD fucked up and wanted to chase the top perf at all costs because that's what Intel did since forever and no one batted an eye at the terrible power consumption. They should have done it out of the box like they did with Zen 3. What was Zen 3 normal mode is now Zen 4 half power consumption.
@SimplyTakuma2 жыл бұрын
@@OneAngrehCat Well atleast i love that AMD gives that _option_ .
@Tarets2 жыл бұрын
@@SimplyTakuma They both do.
@alexmills13292 жыл бұрын
I think dropping 30C is something most people would want and notice far more than the 5% slower CPU. With how fast the CPU is, I think it make sense for most users like that.
@mikaeo232 жыл бұрын
Yup. I want my computer to run cooler so my room doesn't get as hot from it. So I'm loving the eco mode
@malazan6004 Жыл бұрын
ECO mode in my asus bios makes my 5800x run with temps that made my jaw drop to the floor
@Sybertek2 жыл бұрын
105w Eco Mode is looking pretty damn good at this point. Wonderful video!
@ronjatter2 жыл бұрын
AMD should intoduce a 7950E processor. It could be exactly the same but with default 105w tdp. If they saved the better quality binned dies for this the performance would be about the same as well.
@GamersNexus2 жыл бұрын
Interesting idea! What does everyone else think?
@Proto_is_noob2 жыл бұрын
@@GamersNexus i like it
@mrm70582 жыл бұрын
@@GamersNexus I am not sure. I mean, would it be better than buying a regular 7950 and set the power limit to 105W? What I do think however the Eco mode should be more promoted and super easy to access, even for user who usually don't change stuff in the BIOS (because people who temper with the BIOS are a tiny minority). At least here in Europe power efficiency matters ... thanks to skyrocketing electricity bills.
@PowellCat7452 жыл бұрын
Pretty sure better binned dies will go to Zen 4 3D
@mduckernz2 жыл бұрын
@@mrm7058 If it were binned it would almost necessarily be better
@earnistse48992 жыл бұрын
Efficiency is something I believe is a mark of great generational improvement. All the companies can just blast powers each gen to get more performance but getting more performance or getting the same performance as last gen but consuming less power is something truly amazing these days.
@defnotatroll2 жыл бұрын
Yeap. Amd and Apple are working wonders with their chips in this regard
@paulgoulette65552 жыл бұрын
Perfect timing! I was waiting for someone to do a deep dive on ECO mode...great video! I will be building a 7950X in the next month or so...and will run it in ECO mode. Makes a lot of sense not to drive the CPU so hard for such small gains.
@Matti69502 жыл бұрын
Exactly my thoughts. I basically wanted better then ryzen 5000 performance but at least same efficiency. The 105 watt eco mode is even better then expected. It looses barely performance, few % tops, but it still 'crushes' the 5950x, win win situation.
@Pro720HyperMaster7202 жыл бұрын
17:17 is impressive how the 7950X in 65W ECO mode performs better than the 5950X stock 8' vs 9.4' (16:16) and given the efficiency chart 11.8W vs 18.9W (15:15) if you want the maximum performance with the minimum power draw is an option, in fact with that efficiency I wouldn’t be surprise if we see 16 core CPUs in laptops soon
@tilapiadave32342 жыл бұрын
IMPRESSIVE that a newer CPU performs better than last gen cpu ,,, GEEZE what a twit
@jasonk4099 Жыл бұрын
Well you were right
@baronsengir1872 жыл бұрын
We need this renewed interest in efficiency. This is a point that could drive me to AMD
@JFinns2 жыл бұрын
Agreed, this is a point that DID drive me to AMD. No regrets Ryzen is fantastic too and less energy wasted.
@bagman53692 жыл бұрын
like wise bro and to think intel might have cheaper platform people only think in short term cost, for me the cheapest electricity bill for years of productivity/gaming wins. That's why i prefer efficiency/performance
@adherry81422 жыл бұрын
@@bagman5369 Hardware Manufacturers producing Hardware like the everyone has parents that pay for the Electricity.
@HigherMammal2 жыл бұрын
Thanks for all the hard work Steve & GN team. As a graphic designer with a 6 year old entry-level CPU, this has felt like the year to start fresh with AM5, and I'd been waiting on eco-mode reviews to pick between the 7950 or 7900 and find a sweet spot that works for me so this gives me a clear answer.
@imglidinhere2 жыл бұрын
Yeah it's what we were all expecting to find, ya? The 7950X is waaay outside it's efficiency curve at stock settings. I imagine if you could hard limit the PPT to 170w, that'd be where the efficiency curve peaks and you get the best performance for the wattage. Good testing guys! Love this! :D
@kyoudaiken2 жыл бұрын
It's funny how NVidia and Intel did EXACTLY the same. This is just for the WOW effect and also to please investors. The customers and the environment are dirt to them.
@kyoudaiken2 жыл бұрын
If you have a 7950X, you could try to enter the following manually into PBO: 186W, 125A, 197A -> This is exactly in-between AM5 105W cTDP and AM5 170W cTDP mode according to the table at 5:55. I bet you only see slightly lower performance in benchmarks only but won't be noticing ANY difference between Stock and this setting. Also, it will probably still lower temperatures down by 20 Kelvin, which might even result in higher clocks (and thus even higher performance) depending how constrained your cooling solution is!
@PlaiSeek2 жыл бұрын
If you want 125W TDP, which is 20 higher than 105, the diff between 105 and 170 being 65: PPT = 142 + (230-142) * 20/65 = ~169W TDC = 110 + (160-110) * 20/65 = ~125A EDC = 170 + (225-170) * 20/65 = ~187A
@kyoudaiken2 жыл бұрын
@@PlaiSeek I didn't target a specific TDP here, just something in-between the two. Just for testing purposes. I don't have a 7950X and I won't upgrade until there's a CPU with 3x the single core performance than my TR 3960X and 50% faster than it in multi core.
@PlaiSeek2 жыл бұрын
@@kyoudaiken Yes sry, I've edited my answer, however the in between would be 135A for TDC ;)
@hyrenaj28882 жыл бұрын
105W looks like a great balance of speed and efficiency while 65W would be good for really big tasks where you can leave the computer on for an extended period of time (say overnight or out for a meal or whatever).
@robeckel49652 жыл бұрын
This is just what I was looking for. I'd be interested in seeing an undervolting video, as well. A comparison with the 13900K in an "Eco" mode and undervolted would also be interesting. I'm a big proponent of performance per watt.
@DigitalJedi2 жыл бұрын
I'd love to see a 13900K undervolted and maybe even downclocked a bit. I think you could shave maybe 400mhz off of the P-cores and still have a total monster of a chip. The E-cores can mostly be left alone, but taking them down to just 4.0ghz wouldn't hurt to bad either.
@allex2882 жыл бұрын
Thank you for the video. Efficiency is underappreciated these days
@christophermullins71632 жыл бұрын
In the next few generations it will be front and center. GPU and CPU.
@Agm1995gamer2 жыл бұрын
It also happened for some time during the nvidia gtx 400-500 series I believe the amd fx cpu's too.
@-opus2 жыл бұрын
Look forward to seeing these results for the full range of AMD and intel
@viandermightyranger5 күн бұрын
As an owner of a 7950x, I really appreciated this. Great video! I'd already decided (based on some other stuff I'd read) to run 105W Eco, but this really helped nail down that decision!
@sandmaster44442 жыл бұрын
My personal interest in this is that I donate my spare CPU cycles through boinc when I don't need them. For that, I limit my (4800H laptop) CPU to 20W using power saving mode. In that case, the efficiency is absolutely worth it!! Balanced mode is 10% higher frequency for 75% more power and I don't even bother with High Performance mode. I just suspend boinc when I want to use my computer quickly!
@mrm70582 жыл бұрын
I would love to see benchmarks between different CPUs (Intel and AMD) limited to the same power limit.
@finestPlugins2 жыл бұрын
der8auer did that after 13th gen was released. They trade blows.
@tranquil147382 жыл бұрын
@@finestPlugins really? Zen 4 should be better than Raptor-L it’s on the 5nm node, whereas intels 10 super fin thing is probably closer to 6nm (7 with increased transistor density) nowadays
@finestPlugins2 жыл бұрын
@@tranquil14738 But then density isn't everything.
@weasle29042 жыл бұрын
@@tranquil14738 The intel node is less efficient, its just certain benchmarks do better on Intel and therefore "trade blows" even though overall the AMD architecture is infact more efficient, especially with less aggressive boosting. But to be completely honest it's not a huge difference, Intel have optimized their process pretty well and at reduced power frequencies is pretty efficient too. However out the box with uncapped Turbo Boost, Intel consumes ridiculous amounts of power lol
@madb1322 жыл бұрын
@@finestPlugins Japanese train stations would beg to differ.😁
@Kr1sVr2 жыл бұрын
Just upgraded to 7700X yesterday and met with absolutely fans blasting with first benchmark because of 90+ temps. But I knew that before buying. After enabling ECO mode, which for 7700X would be 65W as it is 105W TDP stock. Huge difference in temps(Barely hear fans as temps stay around 60) and decent power consumption. And while it is not same CPU, I dont expect huge drop in performance with 7700X either.....eco mode is the way to go. I somewhat understand the need to extract everything out of the CPU while sacrificing power and thermals...because performance sells. At the same time, they almost lost my sale if it wasn't for the eco mode, I just wish they mentioned it more. Although it was kinda simple option in the bios if you search it and I believe Ryzen master has it also. I didn't actually know that. After reading couple articles I though you had to input numbers in the BIOS/PBO and thats what I first did. Didn't actually work for some reason, but then I found simple eco mode setting in bios and that worked well.
@Jack_Sparrow1312 жыл бұрын
Try PBO undervolt 20mV.. it's will go from 150w max to 99w max (more or less) with 1-2% loss in frequency it's will be good mix of performnce per watts Am waiting my 7700x to arrive.. still didn't decide what Mobo I should get.. Am leaning between Asus TUF B650 & MSI Tomahawk B650.. Tomahwak is better but slightly more pricy
@Kr1sVr2 жыл бұрын
@@Jack_Sparrow131 I keep that in mind, but dont want to mess too much right now. It works and I'm happy with performance, temps and power. I went with Tuf B650 as I also had Tuf B550 and had no problems with it.
@Jack_Sparrow1312 жыл бұрын
@@Kr1sVr did U try OC the RAM ? I heard some RAM models have issues hitting anything more than Stock.. Also I hears when enabling XMP/EXPO (RAM OC) its losses the PC sleep mode
@Kr1sVr2 жыл бұрын
@@Jack_Sparrow131 I bought Corsair 6000Mhz EXPO ram and after updating bios to latest I did enable it. Asus has EXPO I and EXPO II, one being EXPO with some extra ASUS settings I guess. But both settings worked no problem. Same for sleep, it's there and does work. On first day, I did notice some weird things, like my mouse didn't wake PC up, keyboard did....aswell my PC didn't pick up my TV HDMI when waking up, had to switch to monitor with Win + P and back TV. But day 2 and now 3....mouse wakes it up, TV gets picked up. Looking good so far!
@Jack_Sparrow1312 жыл бұрын
@@Kr1sVr thanks for the details.. yeah seems the bios updates helped a bit for ironing some bugs & compatibility overall I'll guess I'll go with B650 TUF also, it's not great like Strix or even Tomahawk.. but at least it's cheaper & good overall Best of luck to you mate
@garrettkajmowicz2 жыл бұрын
65W Eco mode is more likely to be interesting for the datacenter where power costs, density and cooling matter a lot more.
@netiturtle2 жыл бұрын
105w Eco mode + mild undervolt would further increase the efficiency, including scenarios where only single or few cores get stressed. With no loss in performance, except when all or most cores are stressed
@lennyvlaminov9480 Жыл бұрын
Lot of numbers instead of that mumbo jumbo, one of the best take on the subject I've seen on YT, thx!
@DQSpider2 жыл бұрын
Totally anecdotal, but I'm running my 5800X in Eco Mode and the heat reduction has been well worth it, especially this past summer. I haven't noticed too much performance reduction in games either, but nothing I run is SUPER demanding. Definitely worth exploring
@linearz2 жыл бұрын
I'm using cheaper 5700x, it is just a 5800x with Eco mode factory default. I can manually increase its PPT to match 5800x stock. For new buyer with some knowledge, buying 5800x instead of 5700x doesn't make sense.
@Skynet_112 жыл бұрын
Me too. It´s great.
@Leon_George2 жыл бұрын
@@linearz That seemed like an unnecessary dig at the original commenter.
@linearz2 жыл бұрын
@@Leon_George LOL
@malazan6004 Жыл бұрын
@@linearz I actually got the 5800x for cheaper than a 5700x on some crazy sale less than half price so in that case I wouldn't say no. I do agree with a big price gap it's not exactly a compelling buy haha but peformance is generally like 2 to 3 percent worse max 5% so very close cpu... The 5800x does sometimes have more substantial single core peformance too but all these things are small anyone would give up to save a chunk of money even if you can eco mode the 5800x and stock it for a lil more juice.
@turtle31192 жыл бұрын
Thanks
@GamersNexus2 жыл бұрын
Thank you for the support!
@KilianGosewisch2 жыл бұрын
I use "handmade" eco mode on my 5950x. I could immediately feel and see the difference in room temperature (12m² room ) at the end of my workday as I am running VMs, containers and compilers the whole day long
@jierenzheng76702 жыл бұрын
Me too for my 5900x! When it doesn't make the room warm too. I wished there were more videos about how to run more efficiently than power at any cost.
@futuza2 жыл бұрын
Same, but I like turning it off in the winter 😆
@KilianGosewisch2 жыл бұрын
@@futuza haha. My house is isolated too well. In winter it's perfect
@Matti69502 жыл бұрын
Wasn't the 5950x a super 'cool' cpu? I looked up some tempts to compare to the insane 7950x, and they were mostly 65-80°C (defintiely not 90°).
@futuza2 жыл бұрын
@@Matti6950 Yeah, but like 65°C is definitely going to warm your room up XD.
@braindeadbzh2 жыл бұрын
What a great video. Just bought myself a 7950X to build a Linux workstation. I choose it over the 13900K because of efficiency concerns. I will definitely use the 105W Eco Mode.
@CutoutClips2 жыл бұрын
First thing I did when I got my 7700X was PBO undervolt by 25mV and reduce the power limit to 85W and the performance was basically the same as stock, but with much lower temps. I was pretty happy with that.
@Jack_Sparrow1312 жыл бұрын
I just ordered 7700x & would try & see.. the reviews says it's around 150w max at 100% usage.. With your 85w, it's like 40% power less power for nearly the stock GHz speed? not bad For me, I'll try to go to 105w (undervolt) with slight OC (might be able to get a better boost?) BTW what Mobo did U get? all the B650 I found was expensive.. Asus B650 TUF is $240 while MSI Tomahawk is $270 I like Tomahawk because it's have better thermals & more sata 3 ports.. but the TUF price is better Feels hard how my B450 Tomahawk was $100 in 2019, while this new Tomahawk is $270 (2.7x increase)
@tilapiadave32342 жыл бұрын
And 48 watts at idle? Vs Intel at 14 Watts ,,, hmmmm REAL WORLD AMD is far FAR less power efficient. kzbin.info/www/bejne/gHm6qXSagLBnjsk
@zerosugarmatcha73482 жыл бұрын
The savior for SFF builds.
@Slimmeyy2 жыл бұрын
This actually helps a ton in deciding whether to even bother with Ryzen 7000. 105W Eco being both faster AND more efficient than my current 5950X is very tempting. I'm still waiting for the 3D version, though
@tommythorn2 жыл бұрын
Thanks this was exactly what I had asked for, focus on *energy* efficiency. I’m a professional and perf matters but heat and noise can become a higher priority above a certain level. The Zen 4 looks good in 105 W ECO mode.
@williamh72 жыл бұрын
105W ECO mode seems like the real winner here.
@elnobl32 жыл бұрын
Would love to see how the R7 5800x3d fares in comparison in all those games! Great video, thanks for all the infos team!
@chrisward0002 жыл бұрын
The answer is “fast enough”. Realistically unless you have a ridiculous multi 4K monitor setup, just about any mid range CPU is fast enough for gaming, even at high refresh rates. Once past about 120fps, you are beyond the limits of human biology anyway, any difference is barely perceptible. These high core count CPUs only make sense for compute workloads. For gaming you are just paying extra for bragging rights. If you are a gamer and already have a decent AM4 setup, the 5800X3D will do you fine for several years to come.
@JFinns2 жыл бұрын
@@chrisward000 4K is less noticible than 1080p, where you are CPU bound to hit the upper fps limits at 200fps+. Once you're running 1440p or higher the eco mode is plenty and 1% lows are more important so you don't see fps drops from your fps g-sync cap.
@tilapiadave32342 жыл бұрын
5800X3D , WAY over-priced EXTREMELY overhyped waste of sand
@chrisward0002 жыл бұрын
@@tilapiadave3234 A bit overpriced at launch, but recent discounts made it a good option for anyone on AM4 with Ryzen 3000 or older. I would not put one in a new build, but way cheaper than a full system upgrade to go to Ryzen 7000 or Intel.
@malazan6004 Жыл бұрын
@@chrisward000 the 3d is basically the same as the 5800x and 5700x at 4k so not a good example even at 1440p its rarely of note. You mostly want it at 1080p as it's a monster for that for those on am4 socket.
@halrichard19692 жыл бұрын
I like it when you do these kind of Videos. They somehow are so much lighter on my brain. Well Done. Thank You.
@biomechanism12 жыл бұрын
I would love to see eco mode vs setting PPT and CO manually. Great review!
@Gho5tComplex2 жыл бұрын
The new camera, lens, and/or LUT on the vids is looking great! Love seeing the evolution of the channel. Keep up the amazing work!
@darkkingastos43692 жыл бұрын
Keep in mind the 65 watt mode is probably for mini atx systems where you can pair it with a small rtx a4000 or a4500 or similiar card so it would also make for a tiny workstation that could be tucked away in the corner of your mancave. You could use a itty bitty air cooler or 120 mil radiator and take up a fraction of the space a tower would and still run cool and quiet by adjusting the fan and power consumption of the small workstation cards.. I'd love to see some tiny workstation builds with this cpu
@shadyweaver2 жыл бұрын
HP or Dell usually try in their workstation lineups, but forget to configure the TDP limit accordingly and make the whole thing fry itself in two years. I can only hope it'll get better, eventually...
@thentil2 жыл бұрын
This is really timely. Thanks!
@kathrynck2 жыл бұрын
A small amount of under-volting is what you want. You can get the thermals and power draw down significantly, and the "overall" performance up (due to absent thermal throttling). It needs a PBO2 'tune'. Ideal power is close to stock, but just a bit down.
@sebastienleboucher1819 Жыл бұрын
this video is a diamond, thank you so much... !
@kw78652 жыл бұрын
I do a lot of Blender type workloads. Stock my 7950x was just way too hot == noisy. Set it to 105 eco and lost maybe 5-7 percent performance maximum. But my machine is relatively quiet now and energy costs have gone through the roof so that's better too
@Matti69502 жыл бұрын
What are your idle, medium low (games) and all core load temps? I'm insanely curious what temp it will be (95°C is unacceptable to me - biggest reason my 3570k Intel lasted 8 years, i do not trust a perma 95°C cpu to make that) but if the eco mode shaves op permanent 10°C in cinebench, all-core loads (and much more in others), that would make me accept it. If it shaves off 20°C while using something like Noctua cooler, I would finally stop doubting the ryzen 7000 series (except for DDR5 and motherboard prices).
@kw78652 жыл бұрын
@@Matti6950 medium (KZbin and other bits) below 50c. Rendering up to 70c. Noctua D15
@Matti69502 жыл бұрын
@@kw7865 Thanks a lot, that seems totally what i would fine acceptable (much better then 95°C). Friend is recommending me strongly the Noctua ND-12U, over Noctua ND15 but both are on my shortlist.
@lazy_cameko2 жыл бұрын
I’m happy to see this testing borne out. I’ve been on a 7950X on my build running in 105W Eco mode and have been perfectly happy, especially since power where I live is closer to 40 cents/kWh all in. The one thing that I think might be worth it is that while I’m running an AIO cooler now, I know I could probably get away with a good double tower air cooler and be reasonably comfortable knowing that it should be able to keep up.
@shiruki.fan.account2 жыл бұрын
I actually had a 5950X running in Eco mode but mostly because it was installed in a small form factor system. Only took a hit in multi core performance surprisingly.
@glosan95162 жыл бұрын
Same with my 5900x. Single core performance actually increased slightly in Eco Mode.
@DigitalJedi2 жыл бұрын
That makes sense. Boosting only 1 of 16 cores should stay well within the power limit when the other cores aren't loaded heavily, and of the other cores are clocked lower to begin with because of the ECO mode, you can actually send more power to that single core due to the additional thermal headroom. I noticed something similar when I was undervolting my 9750HK laptop. I lost about 10% on multi-core performance, but gained 9% on single-core while never touching the 135W power limit. I actually stayed below 120W even in a full Cinebench R23 10-minute test.
@jierenzheng76702 жыл бұрын
@@glosan9516 Do you use the default Eco mode or do you have a handmade one? I am running (95W TDP): 128W PPT, 80A TDC, 125A EDC but hoping to see if anyone finds a better balance based on the efficiency curve like what Debauer showed for NVIDIA.
@frederickmiller5492 Жыл бұрын
I've been running my 7950x in 105 mode for over two months. I haven't had any issues. Like none. It doesn't get hot, my fans stay quiet and I haven't noticed a huge drop in performance. I love it.
@serbianboss3294 Жыл бұрын
would u recommend 65W if I wanna do render 24/7? What temps are you hitting and what MOBO would you recommend?
@twothreeoneoneseventwoonefour5 Жыл бұрын
What fans do you use though?
@JosiahBradley2 жыл бұрын
This is my first time watching on my monitor at 4k and wow the new cameras are paying off, Amazing DoF, RT, Steve with Global illumination is just tooo real.
@Z4d0k2 жыл бұрын
Thanks Steve!
@syntrx81852 жыл бұрын
What is your monitor?
@JosiahBradley2 жыл бұрын
@@syntrx8185 LG OLED 48 C2. I normally watch on my phone haha.
@kxngmars6527 Жыл бұрын
Eco mode is definitely impressive. I live in QLD, Australia and it can get pretty hot in my office. If I got this chip I'd be running the 105W Eco mode for sure. Nice review, as always.
@JBrinx182 жыл бұрын
Was looking for more CPU testing. Should be good
@future23002 жыл бұрын
waited for this since the release!
@kyoudaiken2 жыл бұрын
Back then it was overclocking, now it's tuning for efficiency. Weird times we live in! I'd pick the 105W mode all day over stock if I had a 7950X.
@mtunayucer2 жыл бұрын
Yeah, undervolt is the way to go man.
@Agent77X2 жыл бұрын
Waited for this discussion for a month now!😊👍
@SergeyPupkoMusic2 жыл бұрын
So, TL;DW, 105 eco mode is for productivity, 65 eco mode for gaming, and stock if you want to compensate for something, have a seriously intensive CPU workload, really love the sound of fans at 100%, or you're too cold. Great breakdown, as always, from Tech Jesus.
@mumar1002 жыл бұрын
Thanks for this very helpful content. I´m planning to build a 7950X system next week and as I will stick to air cooling (Noctua D 15) 105 W Eco is the way to go, stock settings are a pure waste of energy. With some luck in silicone lottery and a negative value in curve optimizer the results could get even closer between stock and 105 W.
@Dave52819682 жыл бұрын
Surprising results, but at the same time not too surprising results. This is just how CMOS works: Power consumption scales exponentially compared to switching frequency. The 105W results, however are very surprising. Thanks.
@blancobull2 жыл бұрын
Glad to finally see a Intel X processor in your list. Thank you Sir.
@irridiastarfire2 жыл бұрын
It's worth noting that limiting CPU power draw to
@djashjones2 жыл бұрын
No one cares about music production pc reviews. It does not bring in the clicks. The reviews I have seen are pretty rubbish, shame really.
@Sleepless4Life Жыл бұрын
@@djashjones Did you just call Steve's video rubbish?
@alexv89402 жыл бұрын
Thanks for this video! It will be very helpful when AM5 laptops come out, as they don't usually reach even 105w. So seeing performance at these lower wattages will be helpful for see what trade offs there are for more cores at lower frequency versus less at slightly higher frequency.
@jackalclone12 жыл бұрын
I'd actually love to see GamersNexus do a dedicated deep-dive video on PBO curve optimizer for the new Ryzen generation. Since a lot of Ryzen users tend to optimize their boost clocks via an UNDERvolted (negative offset) PBO curve optimizer, I'd love to see GN revisit the topic of Ryzen's curve optizer and achieving good clock numbers that way while reducing power.
@ethansurveski24522 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the amazing content Steve and team!
@thericethatsmilesback54642 жыл бұрын
For a minute there i thought it was the 7900XTX you were benchmarking, i was like only GN could do something like this this early hahah
@ydfhlx59232 жыл бұрын
FR this is third time AMD launched 7000 series, there will be confusion for times to come... Why did they do that, idk. Itsenot like they ran out of numbers.
@GamersNexus2 жыл бұрын
hahaha, I had to check and make sure I didn't write that in the description or title by accident!
@sp00n2 жыл бұрын
To be fair, Steve _did_ take the 7900XT(X?) with him in the last video. 😬
@swarnendubiswas47122 жыл бұрын
Sometime amaze by his hardworking, keep going
@aliancemd2 жыл бұрын
I kept looking at 0.1% and 1%. It looks like stock is doing quite a lot better there and 7700x was doing by far the best in a lot of those - the “top” CPUs in some of those were dropping under 60fps for 0.1%.
@evrythingis12 жыл бұрын
The 65w mode is perfect for making a professional workstation the size of a shoebox. Most artists are freelancers, and the desire for smaller and lighter weight workstations is real.
@Yuki22042 жыл бұрын
Being able to cut power consumption in half and keep close enough to the same performance is amazing, I can see the use of Eco mode for those who might live on Solar batteries rather than mains power, An environment where keeping to a power budget is important.
@jkell4112 жыл бұрын
I power limit my 4090 to only 80% and don't feel bad at all. It performs light years above my 3090 Ti still. I undervolt my 5900X as well and it does better in performance and temperatures.
@xeridea2 жыл бұрын
I UV 5800X somewhat out of necessity, running Hyper 212 Evo cooler, and prefer under 80C for video transcodes. I am able to get essentially stock performance though. They say 95C is fine, but I would rather have more safety margin.
@Praxss2 жыл бұрын
What is total system power consumption?
@jkell4112 жыл бұрын
@@Praxss, I've never measured it before, but the 4090 alone is less than 400 watts when gaming/running benchmarks.
@odytrice2 жыл бұрын
This is a really useful video for me. It addresses my main concerns with the Zen 4 CPUs power consumption
@PowellCat7452 жыл бұрын
So basically the 105W ECO mode runs at about 60% of the power and achieves almost the same performance as stock. Almost the same productivity performance as 13900K but consumes half the power.
@andyastrand2 жыл бұрын
And generates massively less heat
@WaterZer02 жыл бұрын
The problem is you can also turn down the 13.9k and get better performance.
@PatalJunior2 жыл бұрын
@@WaterZer0 But the point here is, this is a toggle option, while Intel might be more complex, if it was a toggle, GN would test it as well.
@spookyskellyskeleton6092 жыл бұрын
@@WaterZer0 you need to do custom tuning
@PowellCat7452 жыл бұрын
@@WaterZer0 Zen 4 can also use curve optimizer. Your argument is moot.
@michaelvail4769 Жыл бұрын
Ok, so first of all, my friend, you're a genious! The way the stuff you say comes out as though you've been programmed to deliver it is truly amazing. I'm totally impressed. Second, I stopped this video at the 8:00 minute mark because I was laughing and coughing so hard I couldn't focus. When you said Bulldozer was a "Dumpster fire", I literally busted out laughing and almost coughed myself to death because I have a major cold and my lungs are dying! Thanks for the great information and the laughs, even though they almost killed me! :-)
@vensroofcat64152 жыл бұрын
I have been undervolting/limiting basically everything lately. Those last 5% for the price of 30% are not my thing in the current market and noise preferences.
@duckzor2 жыл бұрын
105 eco is a win for those who care a lot about efficiency!! Thanks for the testing!
@broklond2 жыл бұрын
WOW. I'm not one to come to GamersNexus for visually pleasing videos, but now I noticed that the visual quality is off the charts! Great work, guys!
@zickzack31062 жыл бұрын
Ecomode could be well worth it in select circumstances, as power cost approach the cost of the cpu itself. With 170W saved in 65W ECO, with 24/7 operation and power costs at 0,4€ (not unseen in Europe right now) the CPU would gulp 595€ in just a year. At the end a 100% utilization is unlikely though and opportunity costs can be significant. 105W ECO could be a good tradeoff for highly efficient computing and lower running costs.
@zickzack31062 жыл бұрын
With a 25% perf drop you lose 1000€ (Cpu+Mb)* 0,25 = 250€ in opportunity costs (roughly), so you need to redline your cpu but you could save maybe/roundabout 300€/year.
@twocows3602 жыл бұрын
Thank you for this video! I wish there was more focus on efficiency in general. As a side note, KZbin hasn't been recommending GN videos to me much recently -- I had to go into channel videos to find this.
@alexnicolov2 жыл бұрын
Great video, it'd be even better if you can test manual pbo2 tune with curve optimizer and custom ppt, edc and tdc limits.
@jasonhill86962 жыл бұрын
Finally the important benchmarks
@TNTom678902 жыл бұрын
I actually really think eco mode has a place in the laptop market. Imagine being able to plug in your laptop and get the full 170-watt performance, but when on battery it consumes 65 watts. Accompany this with the ability to swap between integrated graphics and a dedicated GPU. You could have a laptop that can GAME hard when plugged in but have a really good battery life.
@lukeforce1232 жыл бұрын
Don't laptops already do that?
@ShawFujikawa2 жыл бұрын
Laptops have done this since forever, albeit not as much for battery life and thermals as much as laptop batteries aren’t powerful enough to drive desktop CPUs running at full tilt.
@mrm70582 жыл бұрын
65W is quite a lot for battery. 15W to 25W would be better in this case.
@Sunlight912 жыл бұрын
No proper laptop has the cooling for a 170W CPU.
@madd52 жыл бұрын
170w on laptop? LOL
@djsnowpdx2 жыл бұрын
Topic of great interest to me. Thank you! I use Eco Mode on my 5950X for silence and lower ambient temperatures in my room, and I don't mind the 0-20% performance falloff in games. My GPU isn't new, so I'm usually GPU-bound or have plenty of performance anyway. Not only is the stock, but well-cooled and higher power 7950X 56% faster than the stock 5950X in the GN benchmark all-core workload, but it loses only 6% of its performance moving to the same power level, maintaining an almost 50% lead as AMD claimed in their unveiling, and better still, Zen 4 loses less performance all-core moving from 105w TDP to 65w, widening the gap between itself and my eco mode 5950X. Awesome. Of course, in games, it's not as impressive, but still an improvement.
@Vole1822 жыл бұрын
I've struggled with not sleeping for a while, and I want to thank you. Now I just turn on a Gamers Nexus video and Steve's voice going on about watts, voltage and hertz puts me to sleep within 5 minutes! It's great, I start the latest episode and boop! Sleeping like a baby.
@Barncore Жыл бұрын
As an audio professional, 30 degree drop while staying with 90-95% of stock performance is HUGE. Less heat means less fan noise, which is a big deal when the thing that makes you money is your ability to listen. What an awesome CPU
@CHEFKOCH18372 жыл бұрын
I wish there was a bios where you can set a frec/volt curve like afterburner but for cpu in the bios and a option to set it per core that would be the best thing ever you would also have full control over the boost steps that way
@NightKev2 жыл бұрын
I think you can do that with the Ryzen Master software (or Intel's XTU for their CPUs).
@smallbutdeadly9312 жыл бұрын
I think Curve Optimizer in PBO does exactly that. You can adjust them per core, and there is even a tool called CoreCycler that you can use to test stability.
@kyoudaiken2 жыл бұрын
Read about the AMD Curve Optimizer!
@sp00n2 жыл бұрын
@@smallbutdeadly931 In the latest version of CoreCycler I've also included PJVol's PBOTuner tool that allows you to control the CurveOptimizer and power limits from within Windows itself, so you don't need to restart your computer and go into the BIOS to change the CO values during stability testing. It's a cool tool for quick testing, but of course it comes without any liability whatsoever. Additionally it seems to support CO values for the 5800X3D, which is disabled by default in the BIOS.
@CHEFKOCH18372 жыл бұрын
@@smallbutdeadly931 no i menan i like to set 0.8Ghz 0.9v , 1.5 Ghz 1.1v , 2.5Ghz 1.3v , 3.5 ghz 1.35v 4.5 Ghz 1.48v i want to also be able to edit the steps between like that not just the end points also every core is diffrent i testet pbo alot with 5800x but just check afterburner voltage curve settings exactly that customisablitty is what i want on a per core basis
@TheDirtyBirchTrails2 жыл бұрын
Wow just wow that is incredible !!!
@thatsgottahurt2 жыл бұрын
Would love to see an updated and deep dive on PBO with information and tips from AMD directly (or at least have them confirm your findings\data). Especially things like tuning Curve Optimizer for Ryzen 5000 and 7000
@xeridea2 жыл бұрын
der8auer has interesting videos on power efficiency of Zen4 and 13th gen, in increments of 25W. For curve optimizer, -10 should be fine for everyone, and most should be able to do -15 or lower. My tip would be test idle stability, I can run -25 Cinebench (5800X), but crashes at idle unless I go to -15. Wish there was an option to boost idle voltage.
@four20thirdeye2 жыл бұрын
@@xeridea idle voltage already runs at 1.4-1.5 volts, not sure why you would want to increase that. If youre crashing at idle regardless of your CO settings you probably have plenty of other settings tuned poorly. I would do some more some research before giving advice.
@xeridea2 жыл бұрын
@@four20thirdeye My idle voltage for 5800X is 0.95 volts, load is 1.15-1.25. Zen4 voltages are similar, or slightly lower. I have no earthly clue where you got 1.5V for idle. CPUs haven't ran at this voltage in ages. Even OC people don't even run that high without liquid nitrogen. Do you think CPUs run 2 volts under load? I suggest you hold back commenting altogether, you clearly have no idea what you are talking about.
@thatsgottahurt2 жыл бұрын
and ^thats^ why I want some information from AMD
@viennagamer16832 жыл бұрын
very informative video and for me, perfectly timed as well, as I will get my 7950X next week and build my new system, I will definitely try it out both on full power and 105 TDP and see how it differs in the areas that are relevant to me, which are temperature and loudness of the overall system. thank you!
@LeftJoystick2 жыл бұрын
I’ve been intentionally limiting perf on my 5900X + RTX 3070ti. It’s addicting.
@SergeyPupkoMusic2 жыл бұрын
So I tried limiting my 7950x by temp. Before I would get a cinebench score of around 6050-6150, tried tweaking a few things in bios, got 6240 but BSOD'd and stability went out. Went back to defaults with D.O.C.P and thermal limit of 85 degrees with fans only spinning up at around 80 degrees, before that total idle. I got a scores between 5950-6050, giving up at most 200MHz, most of the time I was only about 100MHz under stock. Ryzen Master was also showing that I was running at around 154W instead of the 170-230W... Yes, the selli g point of this CPU is unbridled performance I'd your cooling application is sufficient, but, when you turn it down to reasonable levels its efficiency is off the charts. Great job AMD!
@Blue_Monkey2 жыл бұрын
Basically: If you have a AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, run it at 105W eco mode, for wallet, longevity and thermals.
@ZeroKOR12 жыл бұрын
makes sense. Though if I was gaming I would just run it lower it seems to the 65w mode.
@randxalthor2 жыл бұрын
Woohoo! Been waiting for this. Hoping you get a really good response on this video so you have an excuse to do more analysis like this. Would love to see how Intel 13th gen runs at low power, too. I'm not running any CPU at 250W. My office is hot enough as it is.
@zengrath2 жыл бұрын
It is surprising eco mode doesn't lose hardly any performance, especially in games where it's near identical performance.
@WaterZer02 жыл бұрын
Most games barely touch the CPU anyway, so it won't matter if they're not getting full juice.
@spookyskellyskeleton6092 жыл бұрын
@Defective Degenerate where did you see performance lost for 105w
@jonathanabbott30972 жыл бұрын
I'm glad you made this video, because I wanted to know too. I know you asked why would you do this. But it's a good idea, if you ask me. I would like to game at 1080p and not use too much power, because of the cost. But then ramp up the cup, when I'm using handbreak for example. Also to help preserve the life of my CPU, by keeping the voltage down and temps. Thanks for making this video 👍
@alistairblaire60012 жыл бұрын
Would be great to have a physical button on a PC case that instantly would switch between stock and 105W Eco. Maybe label it “Turbo”…
@AceStrife2 жыл бұрын
Boomer spotted! Meanwhile I grew up thinking it made things faster, like turbo buttons on game controllers.
@amunak_2 жыл бұрын
What a novel idea! Just for shit and giggles when it's on make it use the eco mode, too.
@sandmaster44442 жыл бұрын
I wrote an AutoHotkey script to switch Windows performance profiles for essentially this effect!
@midniteoyl89132 жыл бұрын
iunderstoodthatreference.jpg
@joshgunn74862 жыл бұрын
Having the option is great instead of locking it down to 105 only and keeping the default at ultra-max is fine for the most part. Love the sleep deprived still going hard effort, thanks Steve!
@kaldeban-xm7oy2 жыл бұрын
I looked at thumbnail and my first thought was 'um, why it doesn't support winamp'?
@GamersNexus2 жыл бұрын
rip...
@tegkgiof2 жыл бұрын
Thank you for the video.
@smallbutdeadly9312 жыл бұрын
I've been waiting for Gamer's Nexus to cover this. I'm one of those people who want to game without consuming an expensive amount of power. For those reasons, I don't usually buy Intel or Nvidia if AMD is being much more power efficient with their products.
@sandmaster44442 жыл бұрын
Check out derbauer's video on 13900K launch day
@afre33982 жыл бұрын
I am impressed with the AMD ECO mode. You can dial the 7950X back to 105 watt or even 65 watt. And in those modes it will in worst case preform equal or better to 12900k. If you need the max power you will be able to flip a switch and unlock the full potential. For my work I see that as very tempting. As you can select to have a docile office 65 watt CPU office PC. Or a semi HEDT PC in the same package