Ostensible Owner or Doctrine of Holding Out (Benami Ownership under TPA, 1882)

In this session I have tried to cover the concept of Ostensible Owner or Doctrine of Holding Out or Benami Ownership which is discussed under section 41 of The Transfer of Property Act, 1882.

[@ashokhegde3321]

One of the best law series lecture and I am appreciative of you Prof Poojari

[@aanchaljaiswal8693]

There was lot of confusion before coming to this lecture nd infact upto 2 slides I was not able to understand it........ Now after complete lecture everything is clr..... tq sir👏

[@jahidhasanimon2076]

Thank u Sir for making this point so easy..doing self study.. Love from🇧🇩💚

[@vinuthabc5596]

thank you,i understood verywell plz continue this

[@chitranjali01]

Ha ha ha example of Mr Shashi Tharoor 😃😃😃 nice video made by you 👌

[@pamelalobo4835]

i love the way u teach keep up the gud work God bless you

[@ashimajiji8060]

Thank you so much sir🙏🙏 from Kerala

[@arjunyadav2613]

You make the topic so easy to study

[@avdnr1961]

wonderful lecture . Very clear voce i am very happy thank u very much

[@umauma2105]

Awesome explanation sir👍

[@vismayauchambally8716]

Thank you sooo much sir. Iam always thank to you♥️♥️

[@harnamsingh5544]

Good analysis.

[@suribabunsuri7414]

Verry good explanation sir Verey eassy wiring exam. This topic

[@2002dimpu]

Very nicely presented..well done.

[@parthgaurav3649]

Sir ur smile is as lovely as your teaching

[@advashutoshshukla8499]

Sir, you make it very easily understandable.🙏🙏

[@bhuvanathangamani7590]

Really its to good to understand and very useful for examination

[@rajkunwarupadhye3510]

Thanks a lot sir very helpful lecture

[@faizalmohamed7543]

It is very useful class for me for guiding me for all subject conversation in Tamil also...

[@anbujayabal3079]

Thanks for explaining in English only

[@gowrinandana5109]

U r gem❤❤❤❤❤❤❤

[@ajayshukla6365]

Thak u really ur explanation is excellent

[@shikharbhardwaj4599]

Brilliant Sir!!!! Very Helpful

[@GaneshPoojaryLawforAll]

Thanks for comment. Please share videos with your friends ☺️😊

[@charanharish578]

Thanks a lot Wonderful explanation sir Always smiling Gives us positive vibes to study And makes tough topics easy❤️

[@RightandWrite]

Very simple and quite helpful

[@mouriyaraja5295]

Video of sec.41 yet to complete but now i feel am comfortable with your expression and the way you explaining things with background picture. Very kind of you sir. God bless you. Can i get your number sir? ....happy dreams sir. Vanakkam🙏🍎

[@meeracyriac3789]

Good video sir.. please do more videos on tranfer of property act

[@bhuvanathangamani7590]

Thanks a lots sir

[@SB-jp7wd]

Good...explanation....

[@arjunyadav2613]

Very well done sir

[@geetanjalidas2673]

Very helpful sir....

[@lawyerparijat]

Thank you so much.

[@venkatuduthala7205]

Superb

[@vaibhavpkhanna]

Even i doubt Shashi Tharoor would have given such tough words :D

[@GaneshPoojaryLawforAll]

👏👏👏 ☺️😊👌

[@advarathypraveen3738]

Great effort

[@spicybond007]

Is there a link or copy judgement on “Luchmunn v/s Kallichuran (1873) 19 W.R. 192” that is mentioned in the video?

[@jintukalita7911]

Great

[@souravdas5137]

Good lecture sir

[@vanshbatra7640]

Awesome video Better then others. Shashi Tharoor punch was lit 💥.

[@GaneshPoojaryLawforAll]

😊

[@athulyams444]

❤️🔥

[@pryankurbhardwaj5625]

Its great

[@athirasajeev6013]

Very useful class sir

[@faizalmohamed7543]

Continue your career for all legal subjects...

[@jagadishtg]

Can you do video on doctrine of lis pendence u/s 52 & doctrine of part performance u/s 53A

[@rukminiray3366]

Please make a video about 53 and 53A .I need it very badly

[@ranjitbasfor420]

Sir, may I mention a little bit of error ? that's Bunnoo Bibee was wife of Alexander and Macqueen was daughter of Alexander, during the lecture, you mentioned Macqueen as wife of Alexander. Ranjit Basfor, Guwahati, Assam.

[@bilalshaikh7055]

Sir i have a qestion if husband purchase a property on the name of wife she became ostensible owener but the possession is under the husband then can wife sell that property and can it become a valid trasfer?

[@aabidislam1997]

Nice sir

[@bhuvanathangamani7590]

Sir please cover all the topics in property law

[@vismayauchambally8716]

Sir, in this in whose name the agreement of property lies?

[@MsDONSHERE]

Sir a doubt in requirements point 2 there should be consent from real owner but in mc donald case there was no consent from husband no sir?

[@ratnanjalibansal4359]

Sir you explained it very well..🙏🙏

[@vishnump9502]

Sooppr sir

[@kannamavlogs159]

Valid

[@sowmyasai8204]

Sir under ram kumar vs MC queen case the sale was valid without the consent of mc Donald But under requirements u said that consent must be there Can u pls clarify on this?

[@anupamsharma9970]

Sir this is mains question please tell me which provision will be explained in this question from transfer of property act. The question is Where there is no gift but a direction to transfer from and after a given event, the vesting will be postponed till after that event has happened, " Are there exceptions of this rule? Explain

[@supriyanavali2082]

🙏👌👏

[@tharanishreedinesh145]

Sir....plz can you put a video doctrine of lis pendens in transfer of property act....mu semester exams is coming soon .....I always follows your video to clarify my doubts ....I can't find out the exact explanation in others video

[@goldengirlgoldengirl7498]

😮😮😮

[@Ankit-xi8nw]

A brings his horse and B his tonga and they ply it and divide the income everyday. Are they partners? Please reply..

[@roadtripwithkhaleef1665]

Mr. ganesh poojary ji its more help full if you use Hindi language and cartoons to make better uderstanding undoutedly ur teaching is amazing

[@GaneshPoojaryLawforAll]

This is a English Channel and my Hindi is poor

[@anbujayabal3079]

Put videos to Evidence Act .... Please sir

[@chandrakumari7683]

Sir can you please explain Doctrine of Priority sec 48 of TP Act

[@GaneshPoojaryLawforAll]

Will try sometime

[@adv.dipalikamalakar7998]

Easement pe video plzz to make

[@neelamprusty7631]

Sir make video for Section 43 to 53

[@GaneshPoojaryLawforAll]

Will try

[@umasanthu83]

sir u have wrongly mentioned that mr. donald purchased a property in mr. donald name... i think it should be mrs. donald name..

[@nooriamina7043]

sir kindly minimize your picture as it is hiding the slides

[@jadejanandkunvarba9765]

Sir no match

[@jacobzachariah9756]

What is so difficult about the word " ostensible " ? Is it not another word for " apparent " ? " Ostensible" appears to be more attractive ! That's all.