GARMIN R50 - My Honest First Reaction

[@gibsonjk4]

I just got one of these yesterday and i think its a pretty awesome machine HTH is better then people lead on and im sure it will get more features in future updates

[@Shaboodle0114]

I think you, like many others, are approaching this release from the bubble of DIY sim builders. There is an entire world of golfers that have been avoiding simulators due to the complexity of it all. The R50 simplifies the process, while presumably giving 3 camera accuracy for $2k less than the GC3. You can take it to the course and then come home and plug right in to your projector. Of course HTH is not GSpro. But for all of the golfers who don't currently have simulators (most of them), being able to play every course in the world including their local course with the improved graphics is going to be very attractive. P.S. You seem a little salty that they didn't give you a heads up :)

[@friendly_golfer]

😂 might be a little salty lol. Not really though, I have never had any interaction with Garmin or PlayBetter so I wouldn’t expect to hear anything about this. I agree with your bubble comment and try to remember that some people will have no interest in playing courses, tournaments, online, and all those other things you can do with software like GSPro and full simulator build. That’s why on one hand you could compare it to ST+ which can be run on pretty much any device someone already owns, also very simple. Seems like this will be higher quality hardware than ST+ which will justify it being almost twice as much, a GC3 certainly is. Ultimately it comes down to if it will be as accurate and reliable as a GC3. If it is then your assessment will be right. Maybe this video came off too negative. I really am just looking at it from the outside and trying to guess whether it will be a winner or not. As someone else said, the more competitors in this market the better for all of us.

[@ppierpont]

@@friendly_golfer I don't get this thing with PlayBetter. All the reviewers who had pre-release units talked about getting one from PB and that PB had already sold out and was taking pre-orders. All this time, Garmin HAD THEM IN STOCK direct. They had them at launch and still had them available on Friday. A business I own is an authorized Garmin dealer, and I checked the availability on the backend.

[@dominiccarvelas3657]

I agree playing local course. It being accurate as shown in videos that have come out comparing GC3 and even sky track plus the portability, just plugging in HdMI cable is nice. Not only to go the range but if you have left righty you need to move it from one side to the other which is now simple to do. The unit is big but similar weight to a GCQuad. Size is most likely to accommodate the screen. It’s a winner in my books that’s why I already ordered one 3 days ago.

[@jerrybissey2642]

Going to the range is useless range won’t give you decent data. Range is for loosening up only. Their software looks cartoonish. Nothing compared to GS Pro.

[@JG_20_25]

Great video. You did a better review without having the unit than others did who had it. An honest and straightforward assessment. You brought up all the questions that anyone considering this unit should be thinking about. Nice job!

[@friendly_golfer]

Thank you! Just my thoughts from what I’ve seen so far.

[@alexhare9451]

Appreciate the review. You seem to be one of the only honest KZbin golf sim reviewers. Really looking forward to your take on the Square Golf sim.

[@friendly_golfer]

Thank you! Square was delivered today!

[@bowl816]

@@friendly_golferI’ll be interested in that review too. I ordered a Square Friday. Primarily of the good reviews from JLag & Blue Collar Golf. Both rave about the chipping and putting. This, no subscriptions, and iPad support had me order one.

[@Evan_Rodgers]

Hey Bobby I’m rewatching this bc I’m obsessed with the R50. I wanted to point out that the R50 does/will shortly support the E6 iPad app. It would be no trouble at all to place an iPad on a stand above the LM. Also, another thing to note about the Garmin Golf subscription is that if you have a Garmin watch the same HTH sub gives you green contours on like 15K courses on your watch.

[@friendly_golfer]

I know a few people have suggested there might be integrations with more Garmin products like that. That would be nice to see and an advantage that other launch monitor companies don't have.

[@pakmanstudios]

That is great point about face angle. I also assumed that face angle must be calculated.

[@hjlamb]

I was thinking that it could be measuring the face angle based using just the one dot. Since it is larger, depending on the resolution of the high speed camera, it can calculate the angle based on the shape of the circle. I assume that's why they use larger stickers than Foresight.

[@friendly_golfer]

I wondered that too but I would think anything other than a single circle would work better to determine angle. Maybe a rectangle would work.

[@dominiccarvelas3657]

It’s likely calculated the same way carry distance is using measured numbers. My guess would be the large sticker 4 times the size of GCQuad stickers. Is measured (perceived width) compared to known actual width over time showing if the club is open then closed or closed then open or straight via interpolation of the expected vs actual data over time. This is something that I think they will continue to improve over time as it does appear to be a calculation that needs updating as it is sometimes accurate and sometime not in a couple reviews already out on this.

[@adamshettle5391]

I am presuming the fact that garmins dots are much bigger may be the answer to this. Instead of looking at the distance between dots to "measure" *cough* calculate *cough* the angle, Garmin may be comparing the apparent dot width to the dot height in order to "measure" the face angle.

[@happyhomelending]

Thoughts without testing, trying or owning one is INSANE.

[@jdog8701]

This thing looks awesome imo. Looks to be as accurate as gc3 from ealy testings and idk why people act like hth is bad. The fact you can play almost any course in the world makes it way better than others imo, especially with the new look. I wish it was 4 instead of 5k cus 5k is about my budget and i need a new mat too. Def leanin toward grabbing one of these in the near future if reviews stay good after these first batches go out

[@murp0443]

To me the Home tee Hero is VERY compelling and worth a hard look. Only $100 per year and every course you could want to play. From Pebble, to Augusta, to the course you play down the road (and any course you and buddies may play on a trip).

[@boojiboy2275]

It's a good point. Ok the graphics aren't great but if the gameplay is realistic that is the most important thing. Plus it has putting which is a bonus.

[@friendly_golfer]

That’s something I may have overlooked. I’ve never used it and I didn’t hear anything much from R10 users about it over the years. If the upgrade is good enough that somebody wouldn’t want to play any other software then it could be a selling point.

[@Evan_Rodgers]

This is probably the only way I will ever be able to play some of the smaller local courses at my previous home location with my dad. I played a fun muni weekly and would love to show my dad the course but a golf trip to play some rinky dink course ain’t ever happening.

[@alainjacob3841]

As I'm currently well endowed with a lauch monitor and have reached the point where I hate hitting balls and only play golf courses, I'm wondering if the 43,000 stipulated courses at St-Georges de Beauce and Beauceville in Quebec Canada are part of the inventory. This is the only condition that will allow me to acquire the Garmin R-50 Thank You for the answer Alain Jacob

[@friendly_golfer]

I don’t know for certain but I think this is the course list: www.garmin.com/en-US/golf-courses/?a2=US&state=&new=false&upd=false&cnt=false&q=&addr=

[@gl0ry]

I'll never complain when there's more competition in this space. More competition is always going to be a win for consumers. That being said, I think the R50 is meant to directly compete with the GC3 and perhaps the Original Eye Mini. The price point comes right in between both and for the price it honestly has more features. There is a lot of buzz being generated because Garmin is a well known company. The other thing I keep hearing is that it costs way too much especially compared to the R10... Clearly a lot of folks talking about it aren't really that familiar with the simulator space. I would not be surprised if Garmin launches another launch monitor priced in-between their R10 and R50 within a year, similarly to what Uneekor did with the Eye Mini Lite. Makes sense to release the expensive one first, then come out with a cheaper model afterwards. I have a hard time moving away from Uneekor because I love their swing optix integration. I am shocked no other company has even bothered integrating proprietary accessories like this.

[@friendly_golfer]

Very well said. The in-between unit would make sense. I also love the swing optix. It’s the best camera / launch monitor integration I’ve used.

[@anpc86]

Would like GSPro playable on Mac mini , feels meant for being ceiling mounted with power button on bottom. Or we kinda of need an established go-to mini PC to support the launch monitor and run software like GSPro. Kinda of like how benQ lean into being the projector for golf sim.

[@DurangoLegend]

You could probably run GSPro on the new M4 Mac mini. The M4 max processor is comparable to an Nvidia RTX4080Super. A little slower with somethings, a little faster with others. However, I'm not sure if Parallels running Windows 11 Arm would give you the full power of the M4 GPU capabilities. The nice thing about it is that it runs dead quiet, no fans, takes very little power and very little heat build up, and is incredibly small. The new M4 mini is about the same size as an AppleTV. It would render 4K easily to any projector or monitor. It is also a reasonable price.

[@kevinbordner3334]

That M4 Mac Mini sounds like something to be reviewed ? Although I know nothing about them it does sound interesting !

[@anpc86]

​@@DurangoLegend yeah that's what I'm thinking too that new m4 Mac mini , I heard in reviews that the base model is a really good deal but yeah since you got to do parallels or boot camp to run windows , do you lose some functionality...I don't know. I'm still in the research phase for my own setup, I have a big clunky PC with a GTX card that could do it, but m4 Mac mini or some mini PC would be a nicer setup.

[@philtrick123]

Sit this one out Bobby. Get a Square LM and see what can be done for not much money. Interesting to see if you can read the screen outside with the R50. Im guessing its lcd not e-ink. The R50 probably has a niche in the market- but its not breaking any new price points.

[@friendly_golfer]

My square was delivered today! Looking forward to trying it out.

[@DurangoLegend]

@@friendly_golfer The square looks like a fantastic device but I am wondering just how accurate it is with club data. Placing a reflective sticker on the club shaft just doesn't seem like it would work very well. Also I have seen that it doesn't read short chips with any club under 3 feet. Not a deal breaker considering the price and if the single camera works as well as it seems.

[@ppierpont]

I asked similar questions about gaming PCs and the R50 on other KZbin reviews from Breaking 80, Let's Play Thru, and others. The part of my questions that hasn't received any attention yet involves the tablet-ready version of E6 that can run on an iPad. Given that all the descriptions of the R50 include statements like "the screen is like an iPad" and "the unit has a built-in computer", then the right question to ask is whether the R50 will be capable of running that software in the future. I'm not interested in Home Tee Hero, but I could be tempted by E6 on the R50. That would be an amazing all-in-one package!

[@DurangoLegend]

I don't think anyone could answer that question as it involves a lot of speculation. No one even knows what hardware is under the hood. Most likely an Arm processor of some sort. The newest arm based processors like Apple's own designed M4max are extremely graphics capable and could run GSPro or E6 better than most all windows gaming laptops. But it most certainly isn't an Apple chip as Apple wouldn't license it to Garmin. Probably an android based Arm processor with fairly limited graphics capability but could be good enough to run an iPad like version of E6. But that would also require some sort of partnership with E6 to get the license to develop an android / arm version of E6. Same issue with GSPro. I don't really see it happening but then again you never know.

[@ppierpont]

A business I own is an authorized Garmin dealer (not the golf industry), and my regional manager for Garmin visited me today. I shared a ton of feedback about the R50, both my comments and input from this community and fora. Even though it has no connection to my business, he’s the person who handles my territory for all categories. He took notes and told me that he would pass them along to the development team. I got the feeling that the unit and its hardware has more capability than it’s firmware and software currently take advantage of. If that’s the case, it may offer features in the future that it doesn’t have. Garmin has done that with several other products in other categories.

[@sellnbrew1]

My own personal sim experience started with a Garmin R10 and Home Tee Hero. Wanting more, I connected a PC and was introduced to GSPro. There really is no comparison between the two. GS Pro is a comprehensive golf simulation versus something more akin to an arcade game. The R50 might be a good fit for someone less interested in a true simulation versus a Nintendo like experience. Otherwise, a $3000 Bushnell launch Pro and a $2000 PC might be a better way to spend $5000. MHO

[@bam14bam]

Only downside to BLP is ongoing subscription cost. 4 years and you have paid for the R50 difference. Computer, GS Pro cost and projector cost are the same either way.

[@jimross7370]

@@bam14bamAgree. BLP‘s high subscription rate drove me to choose the Uneekor Eye Mini instead ($199 yr)

[@alainjacob3841]

When I go to Garmin's list of 43,000 golf clubs, it says contour and update. First of all, what does that mean? How can we be sure that this one is playable at home using the Garmin R-50?

[@pmata814]

Yea i immidiately thought the same thing about the face angle claim. How can they measure it with only one sticker?? 🤔. Sounds a lot like what the ST+ pulled when it first came out. Claiming “measured club data” only to reveal later that only swingspeed is measured and path and face angle are actually calculated. I wouldnt be surprised if this ends up being the case with face angle and the R50.

[@friendly_golfer]

Yup. Time will tell I think but I wouldn’t be surprised if that’s the case.

[@DurangoLegend]

I wonder if they get the face angel and path from the high speed impact camera. They probably need the one sticker to get the speed and track the club path accurately but can generate the face path and angle by measuring off of the moment of impact from the high speed impact camera. Just a guess but seems possible.

[@PIMarine7252]

I watched someone on KZbin do an accuracy test against the Trackman 4 and numerous shots it contradicted the Trackmans ball flight path along with some other numbers. Yet at the end of the review they said that they were impressed with its accuracy. As an ST+ owner it seemed the Skytrack + hung in there better than this machine. In all fairness it is new and I am sure it will get updates but it appears they still need to work some things out before it competes with the GC 3 etc.. Just my opinion of course

[@DurangoLegend]

I saw that too except the guy was an idiot. He didn't use RCT balls with Trackman on a very limited indoor flight setup. In that case the Trackman was basically worthless for all spin numbers. If you noticed the Trackman spin numbers were all in italics. It does this when the numbers have to be calculated because it couldn't measure them . That is why there was a mismatch. In addition, he was reading and comparing the wrong things. Angle of Attack is the vertical angle that the club makes with the ground plane and isn't the horizontal spin direction that he was comparing it to. The whole analysis was wrong because the guy didn't know what he was doing. Hopefully somebody competent will do the same comparison again.

[@jdog8701]

Yep that video really should be taken down for how bad it was done tbh

[@PIMarine7252]

​@@DurangoLegendI don't disagree but what stuck with me was he called out the flight path on several shots and Trackman did what he said and the Garmin went in a completely different direction. I'm sure they will work out any issues since it is new. I agree with this videos preliminary review. Another reviewer said he got a firmware update and after the update the other optical machines (BLP/GC3 etc..) wouldn't even register shots. At the end of the day Home Tee Hero seems great with 43,000 courses but it is not in the same league as E6 or GS Pro and especially E6 Apex which may be equal or slightly better than GS Pro. Just my opinion.

[@DurangoLegend]

@@PIMarine7252 Yes, but if your side spin and backspin numbers are off, so too will be the flightpath that is calculated from them. I realize he called some of them out but then you have to trust that he knows what he is doing because many times those shots were fairly straight with only a slight left or right break. He could have thought he was hitting right when actually he was hitting straight or slightly left. You just don't know. There might be issues with the just released R50 or if might be a case of the reviewer doing something wrong, impossible to tell when the guy doing the testing doesn't even know how to properly set up the Trackman for indoor flight use. The one thing that makes me feel comfortable with the R50 is that it is a 3 camera system. No reason it shouldn't perform identical to other 3 camera systems. Also Garmin has had a lot of experience with the R10 so I would expect that they will continue to tweak the firmware and software until their flagship LM performs to its full capability.

[@MarkLiversedge]

Was expecting you to actually have used one before posting a first reaction film- I mean we can all react to watching a video !

[@gavinleeburn1]

Pulled the trigger on one im in the Garmin eco system already other devices im not a fan of devices behind the Mat. I hope Garmin add e6 awesome gokf etc but tbh with home tee hero more realistic im nof sure ill want to play them

[@ppierpont]

The other integration that I want to see from Garmin is connecting the CT10 sensors with R50. That way, the unit would know what club I'm using, plus my LM information would support my on-course data for better understanding of club distances, strokes gained analysis, and so on.

[@DurangoLegend]

@@ppierpont That would be a fantastic addition. Garmin could be in a very unique position to offer all kinds of club data with this new LM an integration with a few of their other products.

[@jdog8701]

​@ppierpont this would be great actually, maybe also a way to start a round and use the watch app as well to select what club

[@jwheels9876]

Bushnell with 6 years of Gold sub is the same price as this thing.

[@MikeSoutham]

Exactly my thoughts. some of these influencers are being a bit 'Garmin Shill' with this unit... One in particular (without naming names)

[@shawndgee]

Can you try the R50 with more stickers and see what happens?

[@ppierpont]

That's what I wish would work on my GC3. If EM / EML can read the same data with 2 cameras as GC3 / BLP does with 3 cameras, then I wish that extra camera (with more fiducials) could give me face angle, face to path, loft/lie, and maybe even impact location! I can wish, right?

[@choppercooney]

If you dont want the built in simulator then surely the review stops at that point. Clearly that is the single biggest benefit this brings to every other device currently available. I think your point about kinda swallowing that price is off the mark. The ability to have a one stop shop for a lot of golfers not wanting to mess about with multiple devices and trying to connect them is certainly for me worth the cost of admission.

[@bowl816]

I think you should be late to the party unless you coach as well. I could see someone who does lessons using this, you can write off the high cost, and as a new golfer or one taking lessons I would think it’s pretty cool. I am with you almost the whole way on this video. The 1st review said it did everything, I thought great, no PC and its portable enough, and you can play your local course or any of the 43,000 other courses. Doing the math is makes sense. Then did deeper and see you still need a PC, and all the other stuff, now it becomes an expensive launch monitor possibly. BLP looks better unless this has the accuracy they claim. Both the ball and club data with an impact shot/vision, and a large touchscreen. I can see it being with it. For me, I would think about it at $3500, 5k is a bit high for me, when BLP is 3k right now.

[@friendly_golfer]

Well said, especially the BLP price comparison.

[@Ryglado]

An all-in-one is rarely best. It makes it impossible to upgrade one part.

[@jwheels9876]

There's nothing to really upgrade here. The all in one is just the HTH software and the updates to that will be gameplay wise and not graphics as they just upgraded it for this machine. It's not like you can upgrade any other launch monitor out there on the market either.

[@mickeyfarren3803]

Great video, I think you covered all the main points and I think Garmin didn't do the correct market evaluation as I'm not sure where this fit in. Should have taken a leaf out of the Square Golf Sim market evaluation, as I think they got it spot on.

[@friendly_golfer]

Just received my Square today! Reviews will be coming soon!

[@mickeyfarren3803]

That's great looking forward to them, also how is your old laptop and gaming pc holding up to GsPro ver 3 Mickey

[@friendly_golfer]

@@mickeyfarren3803 I switched to an overbuilt desktop pc for 4k but still running 1080 until my 4k projector arrives so it’s got not problems.

[@mpkelley20]

Those early reviewers are peddling the unit for referrals. Totally biased as they were so misleading. One guy was saying you can save $2k because you don’t need a pc. Ignored the fact that 3rd party needs it. Like we all want to play the 2010 graphics sim it comes with. Not thanks.

[@Evan_Rodgers]

R50 is cheaper than GC3 with more measured data points.

[@mpkelley20]

@@Evan_Rodgers It is also way bigger to carry to the range. Accuracy still unproven. Support unproven. Longevity unproven. And my point had nothing to do with comparing to GC3 or Uneekor or other. My point was the people who reviewed these units told people it was an all in one unit and did not need a PC. One guy even went as far as breaking down his PC costs that he could have saved money on. So people were ordering this thinking they can play GSPro without a PC. Misleading all to get a referral sale.

[@Evan_Rodgers]

Haters gonna hate. This thing is way better and much more accurate than mevo or skytrak+, and it’s much less expensive than GC3 or Quad. Most sim golfers do not use GSPro. Show me a portable LM with the same ball and club measurements at this price point with a built in sim? Mevo+ is useless for face measurements and radar is fundamentally less accurate indoors.

[@friendly_golfer]

No hate here. I’m honestly just skeptical it will live up to the initial hype. If it’s as accurate and reliable as foresight it may well live up to that hype. They all have pros and cons.

[@bradswanson6788]

Lots of untruths in your statement. “Most sim golfers do not use GSPro”, WTF?

[@sellnbrew1]

And you know all of this how?

[@sellnbrew1]

…evan rodgers

[@DurangoLegend]

@@bradswanson6788 I would bet that statement is true. There are a lot of people who use E6 connect, Awesome Golf, or built in sims that don't want to mess with high priced Windows PCs or $300 a year subscription price. GSpro is alright but it isn't the only thing out there.

[@tjwallis7948]

$5,000 is a tough sell. $2500, take my money…

[@friendly_golfer]

I should have just said that in the video lol.

[@VoodooZ]

Totally agree. I don't like Garmin... It's like the Apple of golf products... Good products but way Overpriced. I just don't care about a fancy color screen for a a static indoor setup. not needing a PC but having a lousy sim is not an advantage for me personally. I use GSPro for a reason: choice. I like modular approach so I'm not locked in.. And paying 5k$ for it... even less. Still doesn't beat the mevo+ for me (i have mevo+ w/ Pro Package & Impact). If they just made a 3 cameras photometric LM without portability, screen and onboard processing I'd consider it...

[@friendly_golfer]

The screen looks pretty awesome and probably is when using outdoors. Not sure about it as a home simulator and definitely not sure about the price…

[@DurangoLegend]

Why do you think it is a lousy sim? All the reviews of the new and improved HTH have been very positive and say that it plays very well. Extremely responsive, very accurate in terms of slope, trap layout, and green response. I play GSPro with my Mevo+ and I have been very disappointed with it. First, GSPro only has about 20 to 30 really nicely modeled courses the biggest percentage of them are turds and look like crap. There is no consistency between graphics quality and course detail as they are all designed by different modelers. Second, the Mevo+ is really unusable for putting. Especially short putts of less than 10 feet. Third, setup is a pain. Fourth, short chipping of say 15 - 25 feet is missed about 50% of the time. Last, GSPro doesn't have any of my local courses and probably never will.

[@sellnbrew1]

@@DurangoLegend my experience with GS pro couldn’t be more opposite. There are tons of outstanding courses, and they are capable of wonderful graphics. Perhaps your PC is underpowered? I use it with the Uneekor Eye Mini and all of my shots - drives, approach, chipping, and putting are outstanding.

[@DurangoLegend]

@@sellnbrew1 No my computers have been much more than needed to run 4K GSPro, I guess the courses I have tried just weren't that impressive. I like to play the smaller local courses and GSPro doesn't offer most of them. The ones they do offer have been poor quality. Now the famous courses like Augusta or Pebble Beach are outstanding, I agree. However, as long as the local courses are accurate enough in the new HTH and the graphics quality is consistent with some thing like Awesome Golf then I am fine with practicing on it. If at a later date I change my mind then I will probably run something like E6 Apex which looks better and more accurate than GSPro if it all doesn't turn out to be vaporware. The R50 should be every bit as accurate as the GC3 since they are both 3 camera systems and I have no doubt that Garmin will keep releasing updates for their flagship system to make sure that the R50 is accurate and full featured. After all the thing just dropped days ago.

[@awalsh8011]

Spend the money on a ProTee VX…Would love to see that in your repertoire!

[@friendly_golfer]

That could happen!

[@Evan_Rodgers]

Why waste money on the least accurate ceiling LM on the market?

[@awalsh8011]

@@Evan_Rodgers Joe Lagowski would strongly disagree with that statement

[@Evan_Rodgers]

Gotta say your complaints on pricing are disingenuous. I do believe you own a QC Quad? Do you recommend the GC3 or BLP to any golfers? R50 slots in at the same price point with more features than either GC3/BLP.

[@friendly_golfer]

🤣 I do own a GCQuad. I have no problem with spending $5000 or more on a LM, I’m just questioning if it should be priced that high or more like $3500. I have a GCQuad video where I say I don’t think it’s worth that much more over a GC3 and almost everybody should go with GC3 / BLP. If the Garmin is every bit as reliable as foresight then it will be great priced at $5000. That could be the case! I’ve got nothing against it but features on paper don’t always pan out. Again, I haven’t used one so I’m just watching like everybody else.

[@Evan_Rodgers]

@@friendly_golfer fwiw the R50 offers more data points than GC3 and it costs $1000 less, and that’s not including any of the built in sim and video features.

[@dman9992]

I thought you were giving a review not an opinion. What a waste of time.

[@topgunbass]

I was looking forward to an improved r10. Ive been waiting for a few years now. Then r50 comes out and at the price a big let down. If it actually had a pc inside to play any 3rd party software it would have been a hands down winner. They way it sits now is a hard pass. Lastly is you have to constantly bend down to monkey with the screen, and if you need glasses would be a major pain. For the price they missed the mark. Its a shame

[@philtrick123]

So basically a £2k launch monitor with a £300 tablet bolted on. Lets charge £4.5. Lots of 'shill' reviews. No comparison videos. Buy a cheaper lm with a separate tablet and save £2k?

[@jwheels9876]

LOL so basically every launch monitor other than the new Square one is a waste of money because they're all over 2k especially the decent ones like GC3, UNeekor and Quad

[@donsmnc5319]

Don't buy this, it doesn't seem to be a needle mover in the simulator market yet

[@DurangoLegend]

Actually they sold out very fast and now are pre-order only. I pre-ordered mine and it is going to be at least a week before they get in the next batch of units. I don't know how many units were initially made for the release but they sure sold out fast.

[@friendly_golfer]

I saw a few people even received theirs already. Odd that many retailers aren’t selling it yet though.