German Tiger Tank Encounter | Fury | Clips & Chill

[@bobbyricigliano2799]

1:27 That Gregorian chant / Imperial Stormtrooper entrance music for the Tiger Tank is epic.

[@el_benja]

Dude... THEY WERE REALLY a nightmare. The initial rate was 1/4 when they appeared on the battlefield in 1942. You can see this in this very battle. Although Fury was an improved tank compared to the other Shermans, it took him a lot to destroy it. It must have been horrible.

[@heaven-is-real]

oh sht its a gd tiger

[@timdiddy9914]

Nice Hollywood Video but no tank commander would act like this! The German tank would not move forward, because he has with 1000 meters a excellent distance to hit and break the Sherman light amour. The remaining 3 Sherman tanks would not attack an enemy tank with a more superior cannon and amour from the front. They would try to split and to attack from the side or behind. Anyway, a great movie!

[@disfordiogenes8681]

Uhh, smoke?

[@ppjk5203]

The smoke forced the tank to advance so it wouldn't lose track of the platoon. Flanking wasn't an option because of the open terrain. I think the lack of realism is more in the overall scenario of a lone Tiger randomly sitting in a field, but maybe this was inspired by the late war operations of Kampfgruppe Fehrmann.

[@ВикторАбакумов-в4з]

сказочка сидел бы в кустах и пулял максимум маневр в пределах лесочка - белый тигр - танковую роту положил в одиночку ))@@ppjk5203

[@juannatchayevhg8004]

in that case they would request air support, but they would never come face to face with a tiger

[@davidbaca7853]

It moved out of the smoke.

[@sigmaway5717]

Finally we were able to see the only real operational Tiger on a movie

[@KriegLuke]

Not to be that guy but this is not the first film to have an operational Tiger Tank Theirs is the Glory was the first film to have fuctioning Tiger which is the same in Fury Tiger 131

[@konstantinpetuhhov5693]

Т34😂😂😂😂😂🎉🎉

[@loganwoolard2621]

There are a few in the world one is at the Boston heritage tank museum which I highly recommend

[@spateri728]

​@@konstantinpetuhhov5693Dickhead

[@РестораныТанцыКуняЕдаКостюмы]

НУ КАК ТЕТЯ ПОНРАВИЛОСЬ ? ТАНК ТИГР V , MG 43 Лента 500 патронов , 3 штуки и гранаты складываются перед президентом США мистером Джо Байденом . Кубик прошу оставить татуировку волка стереть . Шимон .

[@davehooper5115]

Those Tiger tanks were something else, so brutal

[@davidlloyd3116]

I am so glad that I never (and now 60) have had to experience war. I knew relatives that fought, and died. I am forever grateful for my peaceful and fulfilling life, and that I have helped others less fortunate than myself. We live on a beautiful planet,and I hope that I have brought happiness, with a gentle chuckle, as a wastrel child strokes a homeless cat, who purrs in kind, a simple gesture to a kindred spirit, in a troubled world. Live life. You only get one chance.

[@Michael-wv9dq]

My country is at war right now. Thousands of people died... Wake up!!!! Help Ukraine!!!

[@Slipzedits]

@@Michael-wv9dq you've been given billions its not our war to fight

[@mikesabota2570]

Low velocity gun on that Sherman..point blank right in the rear and still took two shots to take it out.. Tigers were a beast!!👍👍

[@dennisyoung4631]

Fury (furry?) had a 76mm gun, (note the longer barrel) which is a hotter round for armor, but less effective as a high explosive round compared to the 75mm on the usual Sherman…

[@bernardvance9041]

It's a movie

[@jtpowell162]

The longer barrel on the "Fury" tank was supposed to give it the ability to destroy German armor (even the Tiger) reasonable ranges. Fury should have been able to disable the Tiger from the side at the close range it engaged it. This scene was more dramatic than realistic (thanks, Hollywood!)

[@stevenrobinson2381]

@@jtpowell162 NOPE. The ONLY tank gun the U.S.had that could remotely stand a chance of piercing a Tiger's side armor by that time in theatre was the 90MM in the M36 Jackson & the M26 Pershing. That's why they had to put 2 rounds of 76MM AP up that beast's ass-note the "clean" holes in the aft armor-the weakest point.

[@cubanspy1231]

@@stevenrobinson2381 lmaoooo bruh u trippin

[@Asiansxsymbol]

I was there and witnessed everything. Intense fighting.

[@hunterhudson4577]

Did you live?

[@edenbreckhouse]

Fury looks like a Sherman Firefly with the 76mm gun. Fireflys were absolutely able to take on Tiger tanks.

[@ms8600]

It’s Sherman M4A3E8- Easy Eight. The rest is correct.

[@222rich]

er, where did you get that from?

[@fetusofetuso2122]

that's why any german tank commander in ambush would have said: "Hey. Long gun, me kill that one first"

[@Rancast4763]

Very intense battle scenes! British Shermans mounted the British 17 pounder ver😅y capable of taking on Tigers. For some reason America did not do that upgrade. From the looks Fury is mounted a 76mm which was an improvement but still unable to take on frontal armor of a Tiger

[@ms8600]

@@Rancast4763 In 1945, the M1 76mm gun (and that's what the Fury had) with M93 HVAP shells could penetrate 130mm of armor from a kilometer away. The Tiger's frontal armor was 100mm....

[@duelist66]

Nice movie, but this sequence is nonesense.....Tiger would never advance ...it's not a jousting duel...It could stay there and pick them off just as they were trained to do,.

[@Republicansareidiots]

How do you know. Are you a communist trump follower?

[@sirloin8745]

Have you paid to watch a war film before? 🤷‍♂️

[@emrehalitkoc7985]

Trust me. Except pit's nazi hatred or rage against foreigners all armored battles were duels. Suchs as Al alamein, such as Kursk!

[@3Kiwiana]

Yeah bit of Hollywood of course

[@ThanHtut-gy8rj]

​@@emrehalitkoc7985eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeertrrř#

[@egemwn]

this was the best marvel movie i have ever seen

[@philmuskett265]

Crapping myself just watching this. Imagine what it must have been like to have been there!!!!!!!!!

[@oOBlackadderOo]

Anyone else see the opening scene with 2 gunners on the first three tanks? Then in in the close ups on Fury only the commander shows up while all the crew doing R&R in the the belly of the beast? Did they watch their own movie while doing the cuts?

[@geoffmcnew5863]

Pretty good technical accuracy, unlike most war movies...SPEARHEAD! Brad's tank had a little 3" main gun and a Ford V-8 Engine...it was an 1,100 cubic inch 60-DEG. ALL aluminum double overhead cam, too! BLUE OVAL, BABY!!!

[@dannyinaus]

it was also correct when the Sherman rounds bounced off the Panzer.

[@marcuswright3569]

its pretty funny how the only tank that can penetrate its armor is shooting smokes and equally that the germans ignore that tank until last

[@robertpage2023]

Did no one in a tank know that when you first encounter a German tank to immediately spread out and the flanking tanks go as wide and as fast as possible to get behind it as that is the weakest point. One of the flanking tanks might get hit but one of them will eventually get behind it. All the other tanks have to do is lay down suppressing fire and NEVER convoy so close or in a line. The government tank contractors were idiots in designing the Sherman. It was a death trap against the Panzers and 88's of the Tiger. Even Patton was disappointed in the Sherman. To kill a German tank, a Sherman had to get behind it where the German tanks saved armor thickness or when the German tank was in an upward climb and exposed it belly.

[@neurobook]

There is no sense in waiting for the smoke to clear, they should’ve dispersed immediately. It was poor tactical execution. They should’ve use the smoker as cover, dispersed wildly instead of sitting like ducks in a row.

[@nicolasortiz6282]

Stop being a nerd it’s a Hollywood movie. Name a better tank movie rather the critiquing the writers and directors that most likely do not give a crap about what neurobook thinks on KZbin comments

[@nicolasortiz6282]

Also atleast the tiger and Sherman’s used were historically accurate and the visual effects are badass. Appreciate the little things rather then being triggered at a Hollywood movie that is highly censored by third party entitities…

[@nicolasortiz6282]

The tanks used are real lol

[@mattmurphy8288]

While Nicols isn't down... I get your point... they should have kept pumping smoke in the Tigers face as they ran to flank him on both sides.... the reality of the movie is this may have well been their first encounter with a Tiger.... all those frontal shots they took should they really had no idea what they were up against...

[@Maggie_n_Mitch23]

@@mattmurphy8288 , , , enter stage left 👈 '' TIGERMAN '' 🤔

[@GrafMichael-z9k]

Das beste ist wie der Tiger aus seiner Stellung raus fährt Die Musik unheimlich

[@jimparsons6803]

I've seen a lot of the docs from the 60s, on CBS' series '20th Century,' often narrated by Walter Cronkite and aired on Sunday afternoons (this was a bit before 60 Minutes --- also an interesting series). Anyway, the US tank crew members from WWII, that were interviewed on that earlier show (remember that this is some 20 years after the fact, not quite the teenagers that typically were the crews) recalled that their personal tank battles were pretty deadly and quick. Tigers were the worst. The US teams adopted an idea from the Naval plane fighters, the 'Thatch and Weave,' (from what I gathered); the tanks were to act in two unit teams where they would alternate being point. Once an enemy tank would start firing at the 'point' tank the second tank would try to sneak up on the backside of the enemy tank an try to shoot the enemy's tank in its backside. I've seen on PBS' doc (Secrets of the Dead) that the US and Britain would sometimes give their solders amphetamines' to "keep them awake," (The Germans also did this.) --- 'World War Speed.' One of the side effects of speed is that there is an enhanced aggression often seen in the person on speed. A fact that I had not known about. Thanks PBS.

[@GumpGav]

Fascinating, 'tanks' for sharing

[@user-uh7wb4fl8q]

what do you know about the Battle of Kursk?

[@honzavasicek]

US forces encountered barely any tigers in western front. For crews, pretty much everything was tiger or panther due to fear of them. Even god damn AT guns in bushes. That "group tactic" is huge misconception as shermans normally operated in smaller units of 5 tanks so usually they engaged german tanks in group. German tanks often operated alone or in smaller unit due to lack of tanks, spare parts and fuel. Most common tank on western front was PZ IV, JGPZ IV and Stug III or IV, not tiger or panther. In second half of 44, US got long 76mm shermans and britsh used Firefly version from D-Day already, both of them capable of penning tigers front at around 1000-1500 meters (which was around or above average range at western front), that scene is utter bullshit.

[@gdjaybee742]

@@GumpGav You mean, "Tanks" for sharing. 😁😁

[@GumpGav]

​@@gdjaybee742😂 edited

[@amitantil]

Tiger NO NEEDED to come forward LIKE THAT 😅😅that’s so Hollywood

[@disfordiogenes8681]

Uhh, smoke?

[@thespartan8476]

You British better not get caught wearing any Greek military Pegasus Patch in Greece or Europe. My Greek family fought and liberated Europe with Yugoslavia and the Russian forces. The British would retreat in every battle. Europeans could never trust the Americans / Canadians / British / French. Nothing changed after WW2. Americans / British / French, continued to invade the world and murder millions more than Hitler could ever dream of. Greece & Russia make the best WW2 European movies because Greece & Yugoslavia and the Russian forces were the best soldiers in WW2. The real unsung heroes in Europe are Greece & Yugoslavia and the Russian forces, indeed.

[@bengan9613]

👍👍👍

[@MessiaxMessiax]

In the film you see two 75mm Sherman Fireflys, it was a rare caliber. Usually only one Sherman Firefly was sent, for every three Shermans. the only caliber capable of piercing the Tiger's armor at short distances under 500 m. While the Tiger's 88 mm FLAK 43 detached its turret at 3 km...

[@panzergrenadier123]

Not logical enough.In such situation when a column is moving. Enemy will always hit the leading tank in order to kill the commander of all tanks.

[@danielcalero3929]

have I seen wrong? The tiger hits Sherman's (Pitt's) side with a projectile just meters away, and only the trunks he is carrying fly? he ha ha haha.

[@woopimagpie]

Well yeah, but if you want to talk reality at a range of 700m the firefly's 76mm gun could easily punch a hole in a Tiger. There's no way they had to get that close, or even try to get behind.

[@paulkowalik9604]

Great movie, tank crews on both sides went through hell.

[@upturnedkangaroo]

The Tiger: "Because using tanks that are cheap to produce and that actually work is unsporting"

[@pedrooyarce1037]

SIEMPRE el primer disparo va al tanque que encabeza la columna. Y los tigres se mantenían a distancia por la ventaja de su mejor cañón de 88 mm. Bueno, es solo una película para exaltar a Brad Pitt.

[@artxxx7832]

Remember you can see people beheaded deaths on all sides blood and violence but you can not that if you hear insults or foul words that is censored

[@unclecreepy4324]

This was a pretty good movie.

[@candidate3512]

The Fury, cant stand even a single hit from a Tiger irl. And the tiger itself, took 2 more times to produce one and 4 times more to fix just its tracks :))

[@kutyna4nogi141]

the scene at 4:04 is the height of stupidity. 88 from such a distance that it would blow that Sherman into atoms.

[@mierpaul]

The German tank commanders used to say, "Our tanks are better than 20 American tanks. However, the Americans always had more than 20 tanks."

[@ms8600]

W kwietniu 1945 „Easy Eight” z działem 76 mm i pociskami M93 przebijał Tygrysa bez problemu z ponad kilometra. A scena z 4:04 to już szczyt debilizmu. 88 z takiej odległości by tego Shermana rozniosła na atomy.

[@arekpanasiuk1341]

Słusznie. Dodam od siebie, że ładowniczy prędzej by się osrał w gacie niż wyciągnął jedną ręką z pionowego magazynu nabój p/panc kalibru 76,2mm. Kit kitem pogania ale hollybrud musi kaskę trzepać, nie ma że boli.

[@СергейВампир-л6в]

Во время Второй мировой войны англичане и американцы бомбили Германию, убив 2 миллиона немцев, при том, что от ракет Фау2 и Фау1 погибло всего 70 тысяч англичан, при том, что немцы вообще не бомбили американцев, Америка далеко, но никто в мире не верит, что британцы и американцы - преступники, Хамас, не лучше нацистской Германии, вы, палестинские террористы, были первыми, кто напал на израильских мирных жителей, а не на военных, женщин и детей, а теперь вы расплачиваются за преступление Хамаса, который вы поддерживаете, а значит вы вместе с Хамасом несете полную ответственность за последствия и не надо сюда тащить мирных жителей.Они не миролюбивее немцев в 3-м рейхе, к тому же Хамас строил туннели, в которых прячутся их боевики, при этом не пуская туда мирных жителей, то есть фактически используя их как живой щит, если в туннелях прятались мирные жители и информируя ЦАХАЛ, где они скрывались, тогда жертв среди мирного населения в маскировке было бы очень мало, так что все претензии к ХАМАСу

[@menatwar]

reactive armor

[@damianzxcvbnm1403]

Ta całą scena z tygrysem to bajka dla dzieci. Z takiej odległości to pocisk by przebił chyba Shermana na wylot a nie zatrzymał się na kawałku drzewa

[@СергейКаримов-з1ю]

Jeśli zwalniasz, jako dziecko upadłeś na głowę, upuściłeś ją i nie podniosłeś) trochę. Look 8,8 cm Flak 18/36/37/41.Pistolet T:6 Tygrys i Ferdynand (Słoń)

[@Twirlyhead]

OK. This is a scene written around 75mm Shermans but acted out by Shermans with the more anti-tank capable long 76mm experiencing the difficulties that the 75mm would. It's a movie ..

[@stevenrobinson2381]

NOPE. The 76MM was a pathetic attempt by the U.S. to up gun the Sherman. The British did a great job with the Firefly-they stuffed a 17pndr. high velocity gun in the Sherman & it became quite a killer-so much so that the Germans made quite a stink about how to deal with it.

[@Twirlyhead]

@@stevenrobinson2381 Nope. The 76mm was a better anti-tank gun than the 75mm though obviusly not as good as the 17pdr.. So which part of my unimpeachable comment are you actually disagreeing with.

[@stevenrobinson2381]

@@Twirlyhead the mere fact that by 1945-the year the movie is set in-BOTH the 75 as well as the 76 were hopelessly outclassed & a lot of American tank crews found that out-the hard way.

[@PedroAlves-pj4dy]

Look at the ratio!!!just One tiger!... Hollywood...😂

[@dobermannreilly9994]

Waschbrett Pit auf dem Weg an die (Film-)front! Wie immer sehenswert!

[@markusalexiuskostezer9298]

Auf Gefechtsstation ist immer Lucke zu und Sicht durch die Periskope, auch der Kommandant... Das Flab-MG ist zur Bekämpfung von alten Doppeldeckern... Ich war Centurion-Fahrer bei der Schweizerarmee.

[@rogercude1459]

That Sherman fury, has a high velocity gun that unlike the low power standard m4 75mm would have had a good chance of penatrating the 100mm frontal armour on the tiger 1.

[@drjamespotter]

I have only just realised that Brad Pitt was wielding an STG44 at the end.

[@amitantil]

That mighty tiger imagine if they weren’t outnumbered

[@jameswalsh5023]

Complicated and resource heavy to build; unreliable and under powered Maybach engine; difficult to transport; difficult to repair. Patton wanted the Sherman for tank warfare in North Africa. They weren't great in the ETO, but were available in unlimited quantities.

[@apatriot4400]

They were the jats of the tank world. Outnumbered yet stalwarts.

[@hawker7488]

It took two weeks to build a Tiger. A Sherman could be built in three HOURS.

[@thomashahn4425]

So ein Blödsinn, Tiger fährt aus der Deckung obwohl er aus dieser Distanz alle amerikanischen Büchsen öffnen kann.

[@danielcalero3929]

Nur ein weiterer Yankee-Film, der über den Zweiten Weltkrieg lügt. Grüsse aus Argentinien.

[@Ginny.galaxy]

pro, it's comedy movie, just laugh

[@thomashahn4425]

👍 Thanks, have a nice Day.@@Ginny.galaxy

[@сергейсокол-е1ц]

Тигры не выходят в поле , из за засады. Он их и при такой дистанции уничтожил бы. А вот Шерману нужно сближается. Почему Тигр поехал в клинч? Голливуд?!

[@АбвгдДаже]

поп корн в студию . Пиндосы после подобной лажи думают что они и на самом деле так воевали 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@ИгорьШушаков-ы9д]

Видимо режиссёр приказал, американский)))

[@michelmendoza1769]

Does anyone know what kind of assault rifle Pitt is holding?

[@dougjustdoug6391]

It's a German sturmgewehr 44, also referred to as an StG44.

[@jonpatterson7211]

@@dougjustdoug6391 Don't know what your thoughts on it are Doug, but given the Soviets' habit of taking captured weapons and tweaking them to fit their purposes, I'd say the STG44 was the Grandaddy of the AK47. They look an awful lot alike.

[@Viator19]

The Tiger - the tank equivalent of the Tirpitz

[@spana123321]

Sunk by a British biplane,may have been piloted by twenty Americans I’m not sure yet may have to check that one😉😉😉

[@T3t4nu5]

So you'll show a man's head exploding but "shit" and "fuck" are censored.

[@haitolawrence5986]

Why would the Tiger break cover? It's winning ffs.

[@disfordiogenes8681]

Uhh, smoke?

[@malfeitorgai9112]

Lol. Tanks getting turrets blown off, bodies crushed and commanders getting liquified in their cupola by a KwK 88 and you bleep the language. Silly internet. Priceless.

[@michelmendoza1769]

Thanks I thought it might be but I guess there were plenty lying around after Falaise

[@РоманКуличенко-е1в]

Он Обеспечил свою Семью и Погиб.

[@РоманКуличенко-е1в]

Оторвал Палец

[@JUSTICEathena80]

Unfortunately costly Victory ...

[@JoseCannarile]

Esta película me encanta, pero tiene algunos fallos históricos... en esta escena los carros de combate alemanes atacaban primero al primer carro y después al último para dificultar su evasión al ataque. Después diría que el Tiger sabiendo de su superioridad en blindaje y armamento no se hubiese movido nunca. Pero la película es épica indudablemente. Faltan muchas películas como esta.

[@jorgecarlossalinas3812]

decis que con tres tanques viniendo a buscarlo mantendría su posición fija.... eso

[@JoseCannarile]

@@jorgecarlossalinas3812 cuando hablan entre los americanos que saben su ubicación dicen 1000 metros. Los Sherman a esa distancia de frente le podían descascarillar el oxido, mientras que el 88 atravesaría el carro americano como mantequilla. También hay que decir que puede ser razonable que la tripulación del Tiger no tenía ni puñetera idea de lo que estaban haciendo por ser nóveles ya que estamos al final de la guerra.

[@GrafMichael-z9k]

Richtig zuerst den ersten dann den letzten Ist halt Hollywood

[@PaulHauser1]

typischer Hollywoodkram

[@weerobot]

Lead Role was Cast Wrong.. Director should have Stressed the Actors more .they looked to relaxed...

[@raimorauba3187]

brad bitt - kas said ikka palju pappi selle rolli eest?

[@РоманКуличенко-е1в]

Царь Пушка упала С Лафета Это Присвоили

[@saitoghost1844]

Epico...Buena baja...

[@PaganMin-1966]

Even 2 shots on target and yet incredibly the tiger tank crew still alive😂

[@colorfulstring]

During World War II, most tanks used APHE that exploded inside the enemy tank after penetrating it. Also, the tank's engine itself served as a fairly thick armor (remember the design of the Merkava), so shells fired by the Sherman would have exploded in the engine room, so it is natural that it would not have caused much damage to the crew.

[@gastonramos4330]

segundo 0:24 explota el tanque y no se inmuta nadie, descordinacion entre el efecto y los actores

[@dextersahagun5814]

can please 1 of them hit that chainwheel to at least stop the tigers movement

[@partymanau]

The Tiger would have hit the lead tank, then the trailing unit. Std Tiger tactics. Pens the tanks in the middle for easy pickings.

[@GA49115]

why you peeping that normal words what the film actors saying it ? i dont understand.

[@85Bad4ever]

was wrong ,tiger would never charge like that ,but its movie hehe

[@MR-sj6rq]

They are not sweating enough, it is hot as hell in a tank. And you don't hit the last tank. Ugh.

[@TheAmbientUniverse]

Make sure you BLEEP when the BLEEP and then the, oh wait BLEEP there goes the BLEEP son of a BLEEP now we need to BLEEP the BLEEP of BLEEP and then BLEEP in order to BLEEP so that way BLEEP can BLEEP if we BLEEP BLEEP and then BLEEP so that BLEEP can BLEEP there we go guys! Good scene! (Seriously, what was point of posting this video?)

[@danwint858]

Ya you want to meet one in person, I knew some that did and lived to talk about it.

[@marklaronde6614]

A three Sherman frontal attack across a field against a fixed position Tiger tank......😅

[@user-uh7wb4fl8q]

what do you know about the Battle of Kursk?

[@peterabe5485]

der kann doch den Tiger nichts anhaben

[@Joe-vj2xe]

no peep needed

[@ChrisKrusey]

But "Shinbone wants statehood"

[@Dmitriy_K_Khv_MSK_NN_SPb]

Да уж, сейчас эти леопарды гниют в полях Украины

[@LightVit]

Tiger tank was better than sherman

[@PatrickFoley-vf3lr]

Historically, only the British came up against Tigers, not Americans.

[@РоманКуличенко-е1в]

Ваш Гривус Тут Был?

[@РоманКуличенко-е1в]

Как понял? Прием!

[@thomasfranz1969]

Die hatten keine Chance gegen den Tiger

[@21aesir12]

Why does the sound cut out and there's a bleeping noise whenever there's an iffy word? Blood and gore good. Naughty words bad.

[@VoiceOfThe]

We have a lot of tank experts in the comments it appears.

[@Truth_seeker-bl5mi]

Lol true....but tiger moving forward like an idiot was bs tho

[@partymanau]

Tank tactics are pretty much common knowledge now. WW2 tactics have been rehashed so many times too.

[@Drew-bc7zj]

Everyone saying the Tiger wouldn't have moved, but how was it gonna spot targets behind that smokescreen?

[@Veekator]

My dad served in WWII in the Pacific and I have his captured Japanese rifle that has the emperors crissanthom and seals that arecstill in it. I missed the Vietnam nam war by about 4 yrs. I was going into HS when peace talks ended it. Yes a ton of flaws. The Tiger would havevtaken the lead tank and just stayed in position. A ned fir the Tiger 1 that was changed forvthe King Tiger was turret rotation time. Tugerv1 took 1 min to rotate. Also that is the only fully functional tiger and they laid black top down then dirt and grass for this scene in order not to damage its tracks and suspension. Also my rifle like may dad was is priceless to me...

[@РоманКуличенко-е1в]

ОНО!

[@pakkeungli6810]

在此情況下為何不使用白磷彈？

[@spomuc]

This scene might be interesting on a "Hollywood Level" but it has NOTHING to do with tank fights ... NOTHING!

[@РоманКуличенко-е1в]

Пулемёт направь В висок !

[@РоманКуличенко-е1в]

Не Понял?

[@jesseburch7063]

At 1:45, Pitt suggests they 'bum-rush' the German tank. This verb wasn't in common parlance before 1985.

[@mikeyerian2562]

Cool. Did you know also know that Brad Pitt wasn't in WW2?

[@RickHunter00110]

@@mikeyerian2562Yes he was, haven’t you seen Benjamin Buttons?

[@АлександрМатросов-м8д]

Если даже китайцы снимаю героические фильмы про войну,то американцам сам бог велел. У американцев наверное убежденность что войну выиграли именно они. Хотя вся тяжесть войны с евросоюзом во главе с немцами легла на советский союз

[@memorybreak1905]

1 tiger = 3 sheman Yeah I know who win in this battle

[@РоманКуличенко-е1в]

Незнаю и ПРО Гамбит, Турецкий ГАМБИТ ГАМА

[@Matthewbraaten]

why censor it?

[@jordanvannortwick9426]

People still today say they like the Nazis. Can you imagine?

[@РоманКуличенко-е1в]

Уже Видно Кровь

[@Maruder148]

Tak Polska powinna się rozprawić z Tuskiem , Ursulą von der leyen , Timermansem, Jourovą i całym tym skorumpowanym bagnem jaką jest Bruksela.😎

[@snakeplissken1933]

At the beginning Tiger commander says that range is 700 meters. Actually Pit's Sherman with 76 mm gun should have penetrated it with ease from that distance. But this is a movie so thanks Holywood for the excitement:)

[@ЮраГайворонский-и7г]

Ребята ето тигр, легко вы американцы удержались

[@279okiap]

Великолепный фильм!

[@127TROOP]

I see the War Thunder Veterans are on the ball as per usual….. none of these panzers had stabilisation and WITH stabilisation and on the move, under pressure and knowing your life expectancy is probably 15 seconds it’s bloody near impossible to hit a moving target that is pummelling you…..and close range? At THAT range you would have to aim off because main armaments aren’t calibrated for close range target acquisition…..these wagons had very simple gunnery systems so dubious tactics aside this is fairly accurate… but the you would know that if you had done it and not fought from the comfort of your sofa…..

[@sib1982]

when blood and gore is nothing but words hurt so much that you censor half of them; hipocrisy much?

[@heinzdauer9487]

Man vergisst das Atmen dabei !!!

[@needfulthings2701]

A German Tiger in cover and four US tanks lined up like a string of pearls. And what does the tiger commander do? He leaves his cover instead of calmly taking out one tank after another. This is one of the stupidest scenes in this already very stupid and patriotic film.

[@danielcalero3929]

Just another Yankee film that lies about the Second War. ​