Getting crushed by a computer cheater

:(
Twitch: bit.ly/2JnuTtI
Twitter: bit.ly/2sFmNqa
Instagram: bit.ly/2HspaBa
Website: bit.ly/2JGqVA1

[@katkisedpikslid]

He is not cheating, he has a really good gaming chair

[@ptbcf4966]

Siim Koppel that explains so much, thank you mate :D

[@spoder22]

but can it do _this_

[@feminist098]

And a gaming mouse.

[@serxuegoldisprettyuselessi2683]

@@ptbcf4966 isnt that minecraft meme XD

[@Gruesome_j]

Wow this is so funny guy, how did you think of such a funny thing to write on youtube all on your own?

[@mafik90]

Eric: "..at least he is thinking" Cheater : *went to kitchen to make himself a coffee...

[@thebus3181]

Then he went oh no my queen for the classics two bishop mate

[@filomontani8683]

Man, engines are pretty good at chess

[@-_Nuke_-]

Just imagine someone building a mechanical chess engine lol!

[@geometricart7851]

Engines have been pretty good at chess for about 25-30 years now.

[@TG93Handle]

@@geometricart7851 man, you are pretty good at not picking up jokes

[@gabington8990]

RAAAR

[@dayumn7528]

@@gabington8990 GO BEN

[@NortinhoFB]

Yeah average 10s for really strong moves and knowing the best moves against this type of gambit at 1700 is a giant red flag, such a shame that cheaters always ruin the fun of online games

[@Jim-pq9pm]

It baffles me why people cheat in games

[@fuadasyari6600]

Cheaters in online chess is a Shame.

[@Jim-pq9pm]

I actually played one yesterday, coincidentally. I went through his last 3 games, and one of them had a 100% best move, on a 30+ move game.

[@cohatch1]

I don't really get the point of cheating, how that can be good for people? I am learning and I get crushed most of times, but I play myself! stupid selfish people

[@GabrielSilva-gj6bs]

@@cohatch1 they're destroying the game we all know and love...

[@CheapShotFail]

"He's gonna mate me, but he's going to think before he mates me" LMAO As if the move metronome wasn't flagrant enough. Sorry about your horrible luck facing this guy and suprememonk in the same tournament.

[@marfeddewrwz]

I love it when they think before the obvious move. Like when promoting a pawn to a Queen or also giving mate. Humans we follow a line of thought so we can move fast if we have already calculated the forcing moves. But cheaters... they don't even understand what the computer is trying to do...

[@reyalomarooz]

not always buddy..i am 1900 player and many time i waste alot of time finding obvious move like taking hanging queen or pin the queen to the king with my bishop..so its not always the case

[@rogergeyer9851]

As a class A USCF player (1900ish ELO, when I played rated tourneys actively), I've run into a LOT of this over the years. Even back in the days where the network was mostly BBS systems, before the internet got big. I even had players, after a few minute pause, suddenly morph from being, say 1300 players, to masters. They could not discuss ANYTHING about the game, even in a totally drawn endgame like opposite colored bishops with no serious imbalances. All they could do was say "move" and slavishly follow their engine. Now, friends tell me in serious tourneys like the annual World Open in Philly, that they monitor for cell phones in bathrooms, due to cheating. I love computers and even have written a couple of interesting chess programs, but all the cheating is really sad and takes away from the fun, IMO.

[@2019inuyasha]

if I see a good move I always wait recalculate. look at something else and now look back to see if the move is actually what I want to do. seems reasonable to spend a little time since he still has most of his time remaining.

[@mikehunt7810]

Lasker said '' when you have a good move look for the great move"

[@minhtrietvo8448]

@@mikehunt7810 Yeah nah if you are 1 minute in the endgame with king and 2 pawns you are not looking for great moves anymore.

[@Edge0fPain]

>takes 5 seconds to think of GM level moves >takes 5 seconds to find mate in 1 edit: spelling

[@owen429]

To be fair mate in 1 is pretty gm level

[@JimmyDaGent796]

Eric: I'm playing the Budhapest...Opponent: I'm playing Le Stockfish

[@AllThatInterestingStuff]

It's Budapest.

[@aniketbramhankar5980]

I had already told in the beginning of the game, u said I was too pessimistic :(

[@CCPlayz2k]

Haha

[@RBG9000]

How did you know he was gonna cheat??

[@snoviapryngriath]

@@RBG9000 Probably he played against cheater earlier

[@SuperYtc1]

Plot twist: Aniket Bramhankar is Crapbasket.

[@joeyblogsy]

Omg, it’s you! 😂

[@RBG9000]

Thankfully im too low rated to get paired with engine cheats haha!

[@rogergeyer9851]

Random: I'm just a random 1900ish ELO player (or I was when I played OTB tourneys a lot). I've had people suddenly saddle up and use an engine mid game -- COMPLETELY changing speed, strength, move style, etc. And they couldn't discuss ANYTHING about the position when it was a dead draw (I was winning when they switched) -- all they could do was say "move" and follow what the engine did. Pathetic. It can happen to anyone.

[@patstaysuckafreeboss8006]

@@rogergeyer9851 Since when is 1900ish a low rating?

[@eastweymouthchris]

I don’t bother with standard online chess anymore.

[@IIBLANKII]

You say that, but there are 1100 that use engines.

[@galactica1419]

Random Brown Guy same, 800

[@chinmayh2745]

That guy is engineous 🤣😂

[@michaeldepinto3562]

😂😂😂

[@fioloshubert6549]

Everyone has blundered mate in one, when there's 10 mating variations.

[@rajztsharma]

report to lichess you ll get your rating points back

[@satishprajapati1684]

raJzt Sharma how to report to lichess?

[@DeShark88]

But this was in a tournament, so it's not quite so straightforward. There's the time he's lost playing this cheater that he can't get back, and imagine if he'd come third (obviously the cheater wins), but then maybe the points he would win would be enough to bump him from 3rd to 2nd place (and hence winner once the cheater was DQ'd) What then?

[@Spudge]

@@DeShark88 Sorry for bumping this but I know what would happen. The game is treated as if it didnt happen in regards to the tournament but your rating would change. The Chess Network had this happen in one of his tournaments resulting in him winning if my memory is correct

[@DeShark88]

@@Spudge yeah you get your rating points back, but it could cause you to not win the tournament!

[@2019inuyasha]

for his terrible handling of this opening he should get no points returned...LOL

[@rmendeljacobs2832]

"Have I ever blundered mate in 1" *JoannaTries enters the chat*

[@emmanuelhoule8070]

Hes ready to sacrifice his soul to teach you a chess lesson, this man is very empathic !

[@simple5907]

Genius cmnt

[@diabl2master]

So generous

[@awkweird_panda]

Eric is such a good person. Not once did he say the word cheater himself even when he knew exactly what was going on.

[@eugenesesmaiii3278]

I'm surprised this video didnt get age restricted for inappropriate content. That was disgusting!

[@Qrip]

He got reported and can't play in any rated games any more xD Cheaters usually don't even know what to do, most players would go for the obvious pawn promotion but like a cheater, they look at the engine and sees it's M in a number and they just follow the line and win, good thing Lichess has a really good cheater detector.

[@ypsilondaone]

They also ban not cheating players.

[@PrestigeLoft]

Been cheating for years and never caught

[@yusufhussein8204]

Titanium Hearts Loft shame on you dude

[@anthony1003]

I cheat just to make everyone think I'm Magnus or any other GM being mischievous while shrouded in anonymity. I'm sure it makes their day, and mine as well to bring joy by crushing everyone XD.

[@DGTLCLANGAMING]

@@anthony1003 fucking loser

[@IvanToman]

That's why many like bullet timing more because there is no time to use engine in that case.

[@valen771]

its still possible but requires some basic knowledge in programming/scripting.

[@theaveragegenius1376]

There are cheaters in bullet chess too i have faced some i am 2000 on lichess but i dont know how do they cheat lichess has notified me about 2-3 times that i played a cheater and refunded me points

[@adityasinghaswal4923]

AD Hacking Productions. bots definitely otherwise it's imposible to play bullet.im no cheater but i blunder in bullet all the time can't imagine how a person can use a engine alongside

[@vadimniessen]

There are 1s engines

[@Jim-pq9pm]

Well to be honest he only lost 10 seconds

[@TheHigherSpace]

His name is "crapbasket" what did you expect !!!

[@GuanTones]

i think that guy is going to become a grandmaster one day

[@WorkDayPegasus]

a GM in engineusing that is....

[@RBG9000]

@@WorkDayPegasus basically maurice ashley

[@brucexu313]

@@RBG9000 why tf is that

[@ymoob4190]

@@brucexu313 he has multiple engines installed in his forehead

[@GreerFried]

@@RBG9000 Yep.

[@Uria-jz1gu]

His engine is probably running a Carlsen

[@StarGamingPubgMobile]

10:56 1700s would probably take much more time in calculations before leaving one rook at the back rank while there's queen and rook battery. Yes I see the white bishop but It would take time to calculate if you can mate white before you as black get's mated.

[@nuagor]

On the bright side, that was a very artistic refutation by the machine.

[@ILoveHuskies1]

12:09 that's actually amazing. I was so confused at why the queen wasn't taken. Didn't even realize the king can't move to g8 cause of the pawn.

[@jothello9162]

"at least he's thinking" yeah, right...

[@ctfrancia]

I missed a mate in one, and then went on to lose. It still haunts me as it would have been a smothered mate playing the King's Gambit FeelsBadMan

[@nofanfelani6924]

Wow, that computer was obviously a cheater

[@TheRovardotter]

That guy sits around at a tournament watching the engine play humans. So pathetic!

[@burrri]

this is one of the top eric moments

[@ploopybear]

"at least he's thinking" _is he?_

[@jarekw28]

10:24 I think the best move was rook e5, he cant kill knight with pawn cause he loose queen and he is forced to kill rook with bishop. What do you think about this idea?

[@subhamyadav1751]

Queen takes knight g6 because the pawn is pinned by the bishop

[@konanxyz6567]

I think it's just Magnus playing and he got his new gaming glasses.

[@joshual4513]

I get the joke, but the ironic thing is, even Magnus has been trolled by these engine cheaters before.

[@happytrailsgaming]

Whenever Eric leans in and bites his lip you know shits goin down 😂😂

[@barthrobert9871]

I reproduce the black moves with droidfish, the comupter reproduce exactly the same moves as the white there...

[@datboitreble9704]

makes me upset when a player, who is nowhere near as skilled as an IM, has the guts to cheat against one. Like, you're making these pretty amazing moves and finishing the game with about as much time as you started with... hmmmm. Definitely not obvious. >.>

[@calvinjohn2105]

It upsets me less when I realize how poorly it reflects on their intelligence lol.

[@internetanalytics618]

Maybe Carlsen decided to troll Rosen.

[@yanisokamisensei327]

+Internet Analytics So smart my boi

[@xxhummerxx3]

video would be more enjoyable if you showed analysis of your investigation into cheating

[@Mossbergg]

he was in a tournament, its not that hard to see for yourself 10 seconds per move. very good difficult moves made quickly and the easiest obvious moves not taken right away

[@davidp.7620]

No analysis is needed. It's self-evident

[@leadnitrate2194]

He's probably saying that because he got points refunded for losing to a cheater.

[@lamblias6od]

You’re a nice person, Eric, I like the way you take this even when he’s cheating , in my opinion I just play blitz, obviously this doesn’t happens, but fortunately I don’t like classic games

[@rogergeyer9851]

David: But blitz, IMO, is a COMPLETELY different game than slow, serious chess. Obviously there's a correlation between playing strength and performance at blitz, but it's almost all tactics and instinct in blitz. To me the fun of chess is the planning and the strategy. When I was a kid and played a serious game, I would have the game memorized after the game, due to the logic of the flow and what happened. To me, blitz is just totally different and MUCH less satisfying. It's a shame if cheaters take away the fun of serious, strategic, contemplative chess online.

[@nayankhanna2367]

I am quite new to chess. Can someone please tell that why in the endgame he couldnt take queen with pawn on the 6-7file.

[@StephenHughes21]

bishop d3 is mate

[@PushyPawn]

Yeah, I encounter these sometimes too, after a while you start to sense you're playing a computer chip at the other end controlled by a not so bright individual. I just block these people now, you end up encountering more genuine humans after a while.

[@bamf75]

isnt #3 suprememonk a cheater too?

[@Artificial-Insanity]

Back when I played, I was rated 1800 and I would not have found all of those moves and most certainly not in less than 10 seconds each. Super obvious cheater.

[@wenxiaying7197]

on move 26 he could do bd6 if he promotes to a queen take it if he does a random move to qf1 he has to take and then you tack his rook with your rook checkmate

[@smartdeco8074]

It's interesting watching your face change. Think about it though, some people's parents did not pass down this wisdom of honesty or it had been ignored. This just shows how privileged we are by being able to live our honest lives.

[@olivernew3943]

This is why I hate playing classical games on lichess, cheating happens now and then and it really sucks

[@rogergeyer9851]

Oliver: OTOH, as a kid in the 70's, I could only play OTB, and had to beg rides to other cities, etc. to play in decent tournies, as there were only so many local ones. The technology of the internet is fantastic and a wonderful advantage, even if certain jerks cheat. Maybe to appreciate that, you had to grow up decades before the internet was "a thing".

[@slink66]

How you can tell ?

[@dontuwear]

Can any one help me or tell me how to watch a stream from lichess app not website ?

[@abdelrahmananbar6286]

Mohammed Khafagy just click on tv in the sidebar:)

[@fatfighterxDDD]

that engine should really play professional

[@ankushs6448]

"and he's gonna mate me... but he's gonna think before he mates me. Yes. Okay." --- Yess i know the pain on lichess but this works every time with them.

[@jimmywang7401]

Eric you can take his bishop with queen, then take his queen.

[@carrapaz3645]

10:50 rook e5 was a great move

[@robertmee2]

No, it's a bad move. White takes Knight with Queen, can't take back because of Bishop pin on King.

[@diabl2master]

Someone warned you in chat at the start...!

[@deeprekha18]

how did he find out?

[@vladimirfabri9769]

Is it just me not seeing why you cant capture the queen on move 26?

[@ninjaman7479]

Vladimir Fabri Then white plays bishop d3 check, black blocks with Queen f5, then bishop captures f5 checkmate

[@johnvuillemot4805]

Eric has two videos on losing to cheaters. In this one he plays one, while the other cheater sits at third place

[@aztecachess4512]

Online cheating is a big pest that will never be erradicated

[@abdelrahmananbar6286]

Ajedrez Para Novatos ma man usin fancy words

[@jassnaj7443]

da duude erradicated isnt a fancy word lol

[@thomasmartin4091]

I suspect eventually the big sites will have cheat detectors that will even be able to tell which engine a cheater used.

[@govindthakare8471]

Bro i know u , u upload that master class video , great thanks to u

[@vibovitold]

@@thomasmartin4091 not every cheater dumbly plays the best engine suggestion on every move. they may play suboptimal moves from time to time when the difference isn't that big. and honest players can also play engine moves, and they do. now what percentage do we consider to be a red flag, 95%, 87.5%? every threshold will be arbitrary. you need to balance the risk of flagging honest players as cheaters. detecting cheaters isn't a trivial task. like with shoplifters, it's the dumbest and least skillful ones that get caught.

[@dalibor8397]

thats why i only play blitz.....everyone is suspicious

[@malegupta8404]

black pieicse are not yet palced on good square in the opening

[@vikramsrinivasan8176]

It's so worrying to see my beloved online friend and Guru Eric Rosen so emotionally distressed. God bless you in all your endeavours. Your humbleness humility is a lesson for humanity.

[@Jamesnebula]

If there is two people working together, with tech, it is undetectable, they could be holding up cards with best moves.

[@basudevdas1413]

how can i follow you on lichess...??

[@mardigbidanian7119]

I checked lichess and this user (crapbasket) officially uses an engine it's on the profile of this user

[@miguelsalgado9940]

Doesn’t play blitz but was blitzing every best engine move there was 😂

[@axon4113]

why didnt pawn take queen at 12:03 ? then rook could have taken c7 if the pawn tried to advance. Neither bishops were threating a winning play. Basically giving him the material advantage and the possibility to clean up the board. and if bishop moved to d3 wouldnt the king be able to move to g8?

[@andre-fleischer-music5758]

you just left a lot of chances to defend yourself ...

[@emildaniels2377]

Hey can someone explain to me why he doesnt capture the Queen after pawn takes on c8?

[@emildaniels2377]

C7 *

[@emildaniels2377]

@@sidneyraabe6252 ahh very nice thank you

[@forrestbooker260]

Move 27, what was wrong with Qxc4?

[@mullezapp]

Qe5. I mean really?

[@whatisart2337]

Someone told me my car has a pretty good engine... I should try to teach it chess one day

[@viktorwillyam]

He is not thinking... it is processing

[@andrzejgwacik5443]

Can anybody tell me how in 8:06 white pon captured black while standing next to it? Maybe i don't know rules but i've been playing some chess in primary school and i never heard of that possibillity

[@StephenHughes21]

look up "en passant"

[@andrzejgwacik5443]

@@StephenHughes21 yeah, i already checked that, but thanks ;)

[@marcusfossa6695]

I cheated on one game in my life and I felt like an asshole for weeks after. I don't know how these guys do it.

[@yanisokamisensei327]

They are cocksuckers. Thats why. If you feel shame while doing somethin bad, means ur actually not a bad person. But those suckers dont feel their shame, thats why they are suckers.

[@thegoat-ishere4414]

Yanis Okamisensei pussys I enjoyed cheating and crushing people everyday until I got banned

[@freedomlover688]

@@thegoat-ishere4414 A true definition of a goat. At lest you admit it! The cheep and goat may look alike on the "outside" but not of the same spirit. Obviously. At least it is getting more easy to spot the goats and stay away.

[@clivevale]

how many moves is this guy taking at once?

[@thesilenthero422]

Telltale sign of cheating is that, without making any mistakes, somehow all your pieces are inactive while all his pieces are perfectly placed for the attack.

[@justinmccoy4270]

Dxc7 while not too difficult too spot is some highhh level thinking to spot in 10 seconds 😂

[@adamb3422]

At 7:52, couldn’t he do Bishop C6 & take pawn. Then do pawn D6. Then Bishop H3 for essentially checkmate?

[@artmannify]

How come that white's clock at the 6:44 minute:second marks says "19:55" .. and then 10 seconds later at the 6:55 minute mark he has 20:02 minutes left on his clock??? Is it supposed to be like that? Is it something the players have agreed upon as a rule?? Or..??..?.?.

[@tyronea8509]

They were playing with a 10 sec increment (basicallyadds 10 sec every time you move), but Eric berserked. When you berserk, you lose the increment.

[@diabl2master]

Isn't it pretty obvious they gain 10 seconds per move?

[@thuybui1329]

I'm new here and I don't quite understand why after every White's move the time increased? Can anyone explain thanksss

[@7_muhammadmuharromisusmaya196]

don't you hate it when you want to give an answer but you are late? basically every move, they got 15 sec, since it's a classical game, it's 15 + 15, the first 15 is 15 minutes, indicates the time they have, and + 15 mean +15 seconds after they made a move

[@thuybui1329]

SkyMaster Albani it's not too late though, I get it know, thank you

[@7_muhammadmuharromisusmaya196]

@@thuybui1329 no, that's what i meant by late, by the time i answered you already know the answer

[@seismic6402]

Maybe people play a combination of computer moves and their own moves. When the play is flawless and the thinking time similar, very suspicious. The opposing player doesn't get the benefit of the extra thinking time too.

[@dsafasdfsadfasdffdas73]

And look at the standings SupremeMonk is waiting

[@sdavidleigh6642]

Eric had a checkmate when the rookie went up and took the horse. Sack the queen with his rook to land.

[@shanelevene4864]

No he doesn't. After queen sac to rook and then capturing the white rook with check, white blocks check with rf1. Black cannot take with mate as white has a bishop defending f1. So your queen sac would lose you the game on the spot.

[@qubeis]

12:04 why doesn’t work Qxc4? He takes the bishop than after recapture he can take the queen with the pawn... What am i missing?

[@BeatsByCon]

I’m not a strong player so I may be wrong but I believe if queen c4 then opponent queen e5 threatens mate with no way of stopping it

[@qubeis]

Beats By Con yea you re definitely right thanks

[@snickidy6947]

soon as this dude saw eric was streaming he probably "crapped" himself ;)

[@ddflipiq5210]

Hahahahahaha

[@armywashere]

Just last night I beat someone in the city who is a master 2250 and I destroyed him. Yesterday I also beat a 1900 rated player TWICE and I am 1591 rated. There was a spectator who was absolutely stunned. I have been doing over 30 tactic puzzles a day and 2 hours of study a day for months and playing in all the tournaments I can, and playing less blitz. Actually a strange feeling overcame me, like I started to understand chess just in the moments I was playing them. Like it was this hyperawareness that took hold of me. It was quite strange, it was like studying music and then all of a sudden you're composing a symphony. Crappy explanation but you get the point. A rating is just a number at the end of the day. You must have shoshin "a beginner's mind." The spectator told me, you can be a brilliant player, but that isn't always enough you must also play brilliant chess.

[@omniexistus]

And then you woke up...

[@aidenmontour7728]

Why didn’t you play e1 at 10:56 is that mate? Or am I just confused

[@aidenmontour7728]

Audi a4/s4 Ik I’m talking a forced mate by being forced to block or else the king would be stuck but sry I didn’t realize the bishop guarding the rook

[@amirnicolai3830]

@@aidenmontour7728 even without the bishop it wouldn't be mate, if white immediatelly retreats the rook and not take the queen first

[@malegupta8404]

he is very strong sir very strong computer engine playing just bullet type chess like carlsen

[@andresrossi9]

I still don't understand what's the point of cheating. If I play chess to have fun, why should I use an engine? First I wouldn't train my brain, second I wouldn't have fun. It is like watching someone playing instead of playing by myself

[@anonymoussecret5948]

Then why are you watching him play chess lol

[@MrRaja]

Chess engines are fun. But against each other not human lol. Carles is a engine type human and even he needs 15 seconds to fish for best moves.

[@nielsliljedahlchristensen4924]

They do it for internet points!

[@rogergeyer9851]

@@anonymoussecret5948: To learn? I love to watch strong players and learn, or watch something like Ben Finegold KZbin chess lectures. Even reviewing basic principles helps you play more consistently, IMO.

[@anonymoussecret5948]

@@rogergeyer9851 OP said "It's [using an engine] is like watching someone else playing [...]." My comment was asking why OP is watching someone else play, not a general question to you or anyone else.

[@cryptonite8495]

Your opponent may have been 1700 but his engine was 2500.

[@Ranety]

Im new to chess. Can someone explain to me, why he is not taking the Queen with his pawn at 11:56?

[@Ben-gd1so]

If the pawn takes the queen (g6xh5), then bd3 leads to mate . His queen can block for one turn but it will still be mate after bxf5. Dark square bishop controls the dark square around white king and the pawn on the 7th rank controls the last safe square.

[@Ranety]

@@Ben-gd1so oh, thank you

[@guylee0]

@@Ben-gd1so good job explaining sir. A chess professor you should be, if not already

[@ShukRiBAhmEd]

Before playing Bb4 ,you could have sacrificed the queen by Qxc4 bxc4 gxh5 and the game now is playable 🌚 And if he met Qxc4 with moves like Qe5 then simply you can play Qxf7 and there is no way you can get checkmate because you have bishop f8 and queen on f7

[@larsondevin9335]

Queen h8 buddy :)

[@turtle207]

100% cheater, but Eric didn't play the best "anticheater" moves.

[@matthewviramontes3131]

I think that's why he said he wished he played a different opening. Although if the engine was strong enough, it wouldn't have mattered anyway

[@kvlpnd]

At 11:22, does Qxc4 works? If bxc4 then white queen is gone by gxh5.

[@mullezapp]

Facepalm

[@kvlpnd]

@@mullezapp explain

[@Chessdummy]

Yes, it appears it was an engine.

[@get_downed_boi6270]

Cheat on cod battlefield csgo but chess? How low can u go lmao

[@dmitrixallo7072]

ayebrahletsksate not even battlefield/cs. GTA is the only game I understand cheating in

[@30minutesLess]

I never resign I take it the very end no matter how bad my pride hurts

[@PNL1992]

In a timed tournament, it makes no sense not to resign in a clearly lost game.

[@Randoo1]

Sad that you cant have an anti cheat for chess

[@neilperko8882]

Mate in 1 was 5 moves deep??

[@relaxedmonster]

Too strong moves... but i would have played dxc7

[@hewardthediamond2997]

Can someone explain to me why he didnt take the queen at 12:11?

[@CatSurfer]

Be3+ leads to mate

[@zepeterinma]

well, you do have a 1-0 record against magnus carlsen the world chess champion, so I suppose you probably know what you're talking about when you say this guy is a computer cheater.

[@internetanalytics618]

happens every day to me and a million other chess players

[@zepeterinma]

erm.. What about that was snide?

[@ishanjoshi1350]

You are clearly insinuating that Eric cheated against carlsen. You can act naive but those words don't construe any other meaning.

[@zepeterinma]

Breh, it was a bullet game, there would have been no way for him to cheat. The meaning is the verbatim meaning of the comment. Not everything you read on the internet is written with the tone you read it in your head.

[@ishanjoshi1350]

@@zepeterinma I apologise.

[@falahnur5871]

You can move rook on right side to the 4th square so when the pawn capture you can take the queen. Maybe? Idk my lichess rating only 1300. This is on 10:22

[@nouredines7359]

If you meant rook to e5, the Bishop could simply capture it.

[@insertesunombre2614]

Queen takes the g6 knight since f7 pawn is pinned, he says it in the vídeo if i remember right