I MISS THIS SO MUCH! I want to see people in horrible branded shirts playing magic with paper cards and coverage like this.
@rileymeyer45403 жыл бұрын
Hell yeah man everyone is missing life
@erikmoore29183 жыл бұрын
Me too man, me too. Just built a hardened scales deck, ready to take it to my LGS.
@drummingtildeath3 жыл бұрын
It hurts me watching them flick them, knowing I did the same
@jarrybryant7183 жыл бұрын
You have to give it to Reid though he played extremely well.
@subzero3082 жыл бұрын
Same digital magic is garbage.
@Awaken2Ascend6 жыл бұрын
Wow, coverage with the player audio is WAY better. I mean like 500% better. Please keep it this way, even if you're not covering the top pros. I can actually follow the action so much easier.
@EvaSlayAllDay3347 ай бұрын
No such thing as a “pro” Magic player, no matter what spin they want to put on it.
@spidermonkey728024 күн бұрын
@EvaSlayAllDay334I mean. If you play the game for money and it’s your career, is that not what “pro” means?
@mrscratch473 жыл бұрын
Look at all those people standing around breathing on each other. Those were the days.
@johnfromtennessee26513 жыл бұрын
Those savages.
@iamlogic24676 жыл бұрын
I like this zoomed in audio where you can hear the players conversing
@BrunoBarcelosAlves3 жыл бұрын
Seeing this in 2021 and the person in the background at 22:24 is definitely ahead of their time.
@quinnquitars3 жыл бұрын
Anyone else love the way Reid rolls dice haha, puts so much force into it.
@soapbox1873 жыл бұрын
Bring back the original ink and paper from 90s Magic Cards!!!! That smell of a freshly opened Urzas or Masques booster is something I long to experience one day again 🙂
@benlittle55436 жыл бұрын
Damn what a couple of professionals. Reid Duke is one of my favorite players and this match show cases why. Good games.
@willem20994 жыл бұрын
That right dude is scary AF
@stevemont70226 жыл бұрын
It’s so frustrating the times they keep talking over or muting the players mics. They really caught lightning in a bottle with this experiment but they keep not knowing what’s so compelling about this whole setup.
@simonwillig53166 жыл бұрын
8:39 winning turn one confirmed "much better than any other turn" lool
@RagingPoo6 жыл бұрын
If I were Matt Nass I would have appealed the judges call, even if there is no chance of an upgrade. He 100% did not deserve an infraction. And if I were Reid I would have said that.
@KiddyCut5 жыл бұрын
WTF was he even getting a warning for? WTF?
@Ohushi3 жыл бұрын
He let a spell resolve?
@wolfganggangwolfe2 жыл бұрын
@@KiddyCut Definition A player allows another player in the game to commit a Game Play Error and does not point it out immediately. Penalty Warning There are actually several things going on here. The first is that a player committing a Game Play Error can never earn Failure to Maintain Game State. The only person that can get Failure to Maintain Game State is the opponent. A player earns Failure to Maintain Game State when they do not catch an error made by the opponent. Also note that if a player points out the opponent’s error right away, they do not earn this infraction.
@KiddyCut2 жыл бұрын
@@wolfganggangwolfe after 2 restless years i finally know the answer. Thank you, Wolfgang.
@cameroncorrado3935 Жыл бұрын
Matt did mention something immediately, though, literally before any other game action took place. You can even hear it in the audio. I don't see how giving him a Failure to Maintain Game State infraction is anything other than asinine.
@EnJaded06 жыл бұрын
Yeah, Matt did not, in any way, deserve a demerit.
@Daniel-cv3dn6 жыл бұрын
I agree. I felt as though the judge didn't want to seem like he made a bad call in giving him a warning, so he just continued with Matt's (failed) warning to save his rep at that point. Honestly, Matt did nothing wrong. For one thing, Matt did nothing wrong at any point (he even noticed the mistake, for crying out loud). Also, I don't like how the judge portrayed Reid's mistake as a sign of game incompetency from Matt (again, even after Matt had noticed and the mistake), which is completely false when considering Reid and Matt agreed that they had noticed the mistake at the same time. Even then, Matt didn't make it a big deal or blame Reid for the mistake; yet, he still got a demerit? This situation was blown out of proportion because of the judge; and, the players, even Reid, were fine in their agreement without the judge.
@EnJaded06 жыл бұрын
Danny Solis that’s some shit. Shouldn’t be happen8ng
@Director102936 жыл бұрын
@@Daniel-cv3dn The judge should've made it very clear to both players that they have the right to an appeal in this situation. I'm fairly sure the head judge would've overruled the FtMGS. Reid did commit a (textbook) GRV and was issued the proper warning, but the IPG definition of FtMGS is "A player allows another player in the game to commit a Game Play Error and does not point it out immediately." As a judge myself, I believe it was much too quickly to issue a FtMGS to Matt as he hardly had the chance to read the spell before the judge stopped the game. However, one could argue that since he allowed the spell to be cast and begin resolving, he was complicit in allowing his opponent to commit a GRV. Long story short: I agree that the FtMGS should not have been issued, and that the GRV on Duke was absolutely appropriate.
@Captmorgann6 жыл бұрын
*note just asking a question* So with the silent tombstone being Matt's card does that not put him at fault more so then reid ? I know they changed the rules so that it's suppose to be both players responsibility to maintain the game state so that would put both of them at fault no ?
@Director102936 жыл бұрын
@@Captmorgann There are basically two separate infractions here. Reid committed a Games Rules Violation. At it's base, he made a choice that wasn't legal. We all agree (even Reid) that this is true. The judge issued Matt a Failure to Maintain Game State.This infraction is defined as "A player allows another player in the game to commit a Game Play Error and does not point it out immediately." To answer your question, it does not necessarily make either player more at fault, in fact both infractions have the same penalty: a warning. This warning usually amounts to little more than a note written on their match slip and an entry into the reporting system. To steal words from the MTG Annotated Infraction Procedure Guide, "The key point here is that both players are responsible for the game state. If the opponent is being observant, they can help catch a player’s error before the problem becomes more severe." Hope this answers your question!
@connorpwnsatlife78 Жыл бұрын
The smirk when he Surgical Extraction’s the Griselbrand🤣
@jeffswett45796 жыл бұрын
No homo, but Reid has that kinda hair you wanna run your fingers through. Maybe it's just cuz I've been bald since 21.
@Darin.Hilbern6 жыл бұрын
You must be a ugly girl Jeff!
@jeffswett45796 жыл бұрын
Darin Hilbern nope... Little known fact over 80% of bald men miss there hair. since I'm a guy I guess I'd make an ugly girl.
@VeniVidiVici956 жыл бұрын
Jajajajajajajjaj ur a fcking legend
@nebDDa3 жыл бұрын
Damn dude this is super gay!!!!!!! Good thing you said no homo first though!!!!
@DiabloTommaso6 жыл бұрын
Why reid look younger as time passes?
@michaelsimoneau83646 жыл бұрын
he is a vampire
@BlightningBrightling6 жыл бұрын
I believe it's called Keanu Reeves syndrome.
@ralki156 жыл бұрын
He fucked bitches and get riches, duh........
@paulcabero49286 жыл бұрын
It's his beautiful hair
@goodguyshuckle92706 жыл бұрын
He attained the stone of Aja and with that became a perfect being
@BlackPowderTherapist6 жыл бұрын
Judge is totally an ass here. I would totally push this up to head judge. Good on Matt for not getting mad here
@Director102936 жыл бұрын
Either player definitely could have. All players have the right to an appeal from a head judge.
@KiddyCut5 жыл бұрын
WTF was he even getting a warning for? WTF?
@nickfanzo3 жыл бұрын
@@KiddyCut failure to maintain a game state
@tokyoghost70203 жыл бұрын
@@nickfanzo what does that even mean?
@nickfanzo3 жыл бұрын
@@tokyoghost7020 do you know the rules on an advanced level? It doesn’t seem so,
@Tehcarp5 жыл бұрын
When Reid is eating it he still keeps his cool.
@vanthadoun16 жыл бұрын
Laboratory Maniac win!!!! Awesome and I liked that Reid asked to confirm and said 'Good Game'
@Thesunburntcrack2 жыл бұрын
Reid is a stand up dude
@spaceranger1456 жыл бұрын
KCI looks really weird these days
@D4ddi0G4m3r2 жыл бұрын
I loved being able to hear them talking it out.
@mrzjohnson46 жыл бұрын
I haven’t seen my mtg cards since 2004, I don’t know how I ended up here or what’s going on. I like it though
@jameswhitcomb47735 жыл бұрын
I love these players
@ImaginationHobbies6 жыл бұрын
game 1 is the epitome of 2 people getting together and spending over an hour and thousands of dollars to flip a coin -_-
@mjenkins913 жыл бұрын
Look up the word epitome
@Ohushi3 жыл бұрын
Kinda the point of matts deck. Rieds deck is a favorite games 2 and 3
@ImaginationHobbies3 жыл бұрын
@@mjenkins91 a person or thing that is a perfect example of a particular quality or type. Here is some food internet troll
@mjenkins913 жыл бұрын
@@ImaginationHobbies meaning a literal example. There were no coins flipped were there dingus?
@ImaginationHobbies3 жыл бұрын
@@mjenkins91 a 50/50 chance is the same as a coin flip dingus
@mr.blackcat62236 жыл бұрын
I don't even understand how this game works, 😂
@thelonedart9166 жыл бұрын
Time to learn
@nickfanzo3 жыл бұрын
Learn?
@skylarsj2761 Жыл бұрын
Matt Nass is one of the best combo players ever
@bumpasaurus4874 жыл бұрын
At 29:45 the play by play guy says Reid tapping out end step to play brainstorm isn’t a free spot because Matt could play shallow grave as an instant to get grissel in play and draw a lot of cards. But how would that even work...it would only be in play till end of turn and I guess draw him 7 or 14 cards, but he would have to discard almost all of them being in his end step. It’s not a control deck, so doing all that just to fill his hand for next turn seems pretty lame, as it then removes the grissel from the game and he has a tough time going off the following turn. I can’t really see a reason Matt would ever make that play, even if he had it.
@Readceras4 жыл бұрын
Shallow grave would exile Griselbrand at the beginning of the next endstep, i.e. at the beginning of Reid's endstep. Matt wouldn't activate Griselbrand before his own cleanup step that turn.
@bumpasaurus4874 жыл бұрын
@@Readceras even so, he wouldn’t be able to go off too well, not being able to cast creatures and he can’t crack leds for mana without losing his huge hand. It’s so much easier to go off on your turn to take the cards in waves and be able to play that creature to gain life back
@Readceras4 жыл бұрын
@@bumpasaurus487 Sorry, I'm not sure that I understand your point. Matt would not be forced to go off during Reid's turn, as Matt does not have to discard to handsize during Reid's clean-up step. Had matt successfully resolved shallow grave in his endstep, he would most likely draw fourteen cards with Griselbrand with the shallow grave exile trigger on the stack, untap, thoughtseize/unmask/cabal therapy to clear the way, then try to put vampire hexmage and another creature into play, so that he's less vulnerable to an edict. Alternatively, he can entomb + exhume another Griselbrand into play, ideally with another fodder in play against an edict as well. Note that with mutiple rituals in hand, Matt's definitely well set up black-mana-wise. Keeping a living wish in hand for a rec sage would also help Matt beat a bridge. The downside of doing so is that Children of Korlis no longer functions. I would argue that this downside is not big enough for him not to go for it. Letting Reid resolve a brainstorm and untap would turn on Reid's flusterstorm, give Reid more opportunities to find a FoW, and let Reid disrupt Matt's hand. Perhaps you'd still be inclined not to go for it, but saying that there's no reason for Matt to ever make that play, is imo absurd.
@bumpasaurus4874 жыл бұрын
@@Readceras not just children not working, also leds won’t work for mana as effectively. Cause it works when u draw 7, play it and sac it, then use that mana to play some of the next 7 cards u draw. Also, his gris will be gone which he will need to find, get it in yard and get back again to keep going off. My point is that even tho 14 cards seems helpful, it really isn’t cause u can’t finish going off. Even if u clear the way with hand discard, get a 2nd Gris, and reanimate it, how do you draw more cards at that point? I’m pretty sure he wouldn’t have animated it even if he had it in hand, cause it would be very hard to win from that point on. It’s much better to hold it and try during your turn at some point.
@bumpasaurus4874 жыл бұрын
@@Readceras I was mistaken about discarding, you’re right. But I still think it’s not a consideration at that point based on the flow of the game. There would be no reason to go for it like that. It would be much harder to win from that point than just dealing with a counter or two. He could wait till he draws discard or gets him to tap out.
@Serge08156 жыл бұрын
Can someone explain please what happens at 17:20. I am a beginner and don't get it
@33shin336 жыл бұрын
Reid Duke tried to cast Kolaghan's Command targeting Baleful Strix in the graveyard and Silent Gravestone, however Reid can't target Strix because of Silent Gravestone's effect which prevents precisely that. Reid commited a game rule violation because he tried to do something not legal, clearly by his own mistake. Right after that Matt asked if that play was legal but before asking he puts his artifact in the grave for no reason, that's another violation called failure to maintain game state both players received a warning each for the whole situation, no big deal, both players are incredible magic players specially Reid Duke one of the pillars of this game among many others. Welcome to Magic.
@luxaa3194 жыл бұрын
To summarize, one made a mistake and the other realized it too late, so they both got a warning.
@tylerb73536 жыл бұрын
Wow this judge handled this is the wrong way. Reid didnt argue or get upset but was totally fine with the challenge of the play of the card. Sometimes people make mistakes unintentionally.
@UltimatePokemonFan756 жыл бұрын
Nass should not have received a warning.
@joybarber24306 жыл бұрын
What are you talking about? If you accidentally run into someone while looking over your shoulder would you not say sorry or excuse me? Just because you didn't do wrong on purpose doesn't mean you didn't do wrong.
@coulombicdistortion18146 жыл бұрын
Why was baleful strix an illegal target the first time around? Thanks
@joybarber24306 жыл бұрын
@@coulombicdistortion1814 the artifact that Reid targeted says you can't target things in the graveyard. To even be put on the stack a card has to have legal targets.
@coulombicdistortion18146 жыл бұрын
Gotcha, I just couldn't see from the board state why it wasn't a viable target. Thanks
@zepPNW503 Жыл бұрын
So did thassas oracle just make the grislebrand deck alot better and faster 🤔
@grahamoliver1470 Жыл бұрын
Tin fins has kind of just fallen off the map in recent years. There hasn't been many upgrades for it aside from thassas oracle, but many very strong hate cards have been printed that make it difficult for combo decks to thrive.
@andrebenoit4046 жыл бұрын
I wish I knew any of those cards.
@jacobschwartz49404 жыл бұрын
I watch these videos with Scryfall up in another tab
@9288Savior6 ай бұрын
Where does the deck name Tin Fins come from? What does it have to do with Laboratory Maniac, Children of Korlis, or Griselbrand ??
@dustinpulliam92622 жыл бұрын
Both players reacted professionally to the judge call I feel but can someone explain why matt got a warning? I’m not sure I understand
@B455PL4Y3R2 жыл бұрын
when you agree or allow a play your opponent has made that is a violation, you also get a penalty for agreeing to let that play happen, but only at the REL
@domoarigato98654 жыл бұрын
RD one of the best of all times !
@B455PL4Y3R2 жыл бұрын
7:09 why did he not shuffle?
@codycantfocus3 жыл бұрын
39:05 Marshall Sutcliffe is HUGE
@willlozinak51823 жыл бұрын
i would kill to be getting turn 1'd by tin fins in person right now
@fernandopereyra54334 жыл бұрын
I don't get the infraction. What happened with that Kolaghan's Command?
@charleshayesvaughn4 жыл бұрын
I don't know either! I though it was silent gravestone, but he did it again later and it was still out.
@fernandopereyra54334 жыл бұрын
@@charleshayesvaughn I got it, I thought that it was a Relic of Progenitus, but that's a Silent Gravestone, "Cards in graveyards can't be target of spells". That's why Reid couldn't get back the card from grave, because of that effect.
@charleshayesvaughn4 жыл бұрын
@@fernandopereyra5433 he did it again later though.
@Tupiaz3 жыл бұрын
@@charleshayesvaughn Reid didn't bring back his Baleful Strix but instead chose the discard mode along with the removal of the artifact.
@ptitmaxxx3 жыл бұрын
In the first game, could Duke have resigned to hide his hand (and his deck) after the unmask ? The game was over anyway and he knew what Nass was playing, no ?
@alexandreclement93993 жыл бұрын
Not really. He got to see the whole deck and get info for sideboard, plus he could have messes up the combo.
@BULLZEYEplays4 жыл бұрын
>keep and scry If only the knew what was on the 'horizon' ...
@fbprof2fbprof1124 жыл бұрын
Can smn explain to me pls what happened around 19 min? Why it was not a legal play and what did the judge tell them . It's not my 1st language and can't hear him properly
@planktonweed7274 жыл бұрын
the silent gravestone made all cards in graveyard untargetable, so the spell couldnt be casted. Reid got a game rule violation, Matt a Failure to maintain game state ruling
@fbprof2fbprof1124 жыл бұрын
@@planktonweed727 thank you
@haikvoskerchian28572 жыл бұрын
What sleeves is reid duke using ?
@DataCollaborate6 жыл бұрын
Any GP with Creepy Rudy is a good GP.
@imxfate45306 жыл бұрын
17:40 whats not legal??
@KyuseiFFXIV5 жыл бұрын
Im xFate Reid targeted baleful strix that was in the graveyard while silent gravestone was still in play
@imxfate45305 жыл бұрын
@@KyuseiFFXIVdidn't see the stone also cheers 2month old comment
@Whatmor6 жыл бұрын
Wow a lot of people don't like the judges ruling? I mean he could have stated that they could appeal, but Matt Nass said he didn't care anyway. Also what he said and did is what the rules state.
@malcom916 жыл бұрын
Judge was extremely wrong here. Shame is the players can't argue because... He's the judge.
@VitaKet6 жыл бұрын
Not true, seen a player correct a judge.
@alexisrodriguez71276 жыл бұрын
VitaKet true the very same day, judge tried issuing a grv on duke with his match up against uw miracles
@vereno136 жыл бұрын
How was the judge wrong?
@nickwancho6 жыл бұрын
Reid himself has corrected the judges miss call towards his creature
@Director102936 жыл бұрын
It is important to note that all players have the right to an appeal from a Head Judge. The judge who gave the ruling, upon seeing that Matt was a bit upset, should've alerted him to this option.
@johnmurphy93806 жыл бұрын
Why wasn't Baleful Strix a legal target? I must have missed something.
@IanJCullinan6 жыл бұрын
The artifact in play, doesn't allow cards to be the target of spells in the graveyard
@Systemp955 жыл бұрын
This perspective was so much better. Wish all the exposure want a problem and they keept doing it..
@jilaxwest97706 жыл бұрын
how does he play that many cards of round 1 with 1 mana?
@Devin-oh7gr6 жыл бұрын
Jilax west dark ritual gives 3 black for 1 mana the lotus petals were free and so are the L. E. D.s providing 1 and 3 mana respectively
@sageblack22396 жыл бұрын
Nass got a warning for failing to maintain game state?...Wtf. The spell didn’t even resolve though. I think the whole interaction lasted about 5 seconds. The game state was completely unchanged. I understand judges sometimes make tough decisions especially when they aren’t present for the whole interaction but this was unjust. Also seems like a rule that shouldn’t really exist anyway if it penalises you whenever your opponent makes an illegal game action and you happen to miss it. That’s not a game anyone would get enjoy
@marccernele61096 жыл бұрын
What? Matt Nass put his Gravestone in his Graveyard, Reid had put Strix in his hand, and had moved KCommand to his GY. The spell had resolved.
@bunnystew6 жыл бұрын
Please never play at Competitive REL event
@Daniel-cv3dn6 жыл бұрын
Whether the spell was resolved or not, the judge did make an unjust call, given the fact that both players literally noticed the play at the same time and asked for a judge to step in.
@marccernele61096 жыл бұрын
Danny Solis Unjust? What nonsense are you going on about? Games have rules. The judge followed the rule book.
@matteobicego76346 жыл бұрын
I am a judge and i ve ti say that this rule is right
@garfieldmcsniffit10306 жыл бұрын
Turn one btw
@stevenforman30446 жыл бұрын
Thanks heaps for this. 👍
@jstuckless4 жыл бұрын
Anyone know why Reid plays with his library upside down?
@AIMLESS-NAMELESS4 жыл бұрын
I think it is so he can always know what is his library and what is his hand so he could not mix it up and be forced to concede.
@Onikens4 жыл бұрын
Why wouldn't the judge call pause the time?
@ARQ936 жыл бұрын
Matts resting face is like angry tho lol
@ARQ936 жыл бұрын
after round 1*
@christopherlundgren17006 жыл бұрын
In game 3, seems like Nass should have been using his leftover mana on Duke's EoT to pluck counters off his land. It's unlikely to get there but why not take advantage. With the Urborg, the Depths can even help pay for itself.
@christopherlundgren17006 жыл бұрын
Oh I guess they actually say that.
@blacknova236 жыл бұрын
This guy is the master at solitaire. He basically played by himself.
@lackstarx68306 жыл бұрын
I still dont get it how to play Magic 😁
@nickfanzo3 жыл бұрын
Learn?
@Bladerxdxi6 жыл бұрын
did reid still have Bolt in hand game 1?
@noegiussani37495 жыл бұрын
Nope, it got unmasked
@HighFlyWOW6 жыл бұрын
Someone know what sleeves Reid is using?
@noegiussani37495 жыл бұрын
Prob dragonshield
@tylerwiggins6625 жыл бұрын
this game is example A when presenting how under-trained judges are these days. It's rather pitiful that judges can just be ushered into level one with only hours of magic experience in general.
@EvaSlayAllDay3345 жыл бұрын
It's especially ridiculous when these judges are presiding over games of Legacy, where the card interactions and text can be very complex.
@ZakanaHachihaCBC3 жыл бұрын
What exactly was wrong? Duke commented a Game Rule Violation by casting K-Command with illegal targets. Nass gets a Failure to Maintain because he allowed the game to progress past the point of the illegal action, by acknowledging Command has resolved by moving his card to the graveyard. Failure to Maintain doesn’t upgrade, it’s just a reminder to the player to be more careful.
@Tacttactification3 жыл бұрын
I’m fairly certain that you need to be L2 before you can judge at a comp REL event.
@ZakanaHachihaCBC3 жыл бұрын
@@Tacttactification You can be L1 and be at Comp REL. it’s just common to be a L1 Floor Judge for an L2+ Head.
@tylerwiggins6623 жыл бұрын
@@Tacttactification the standard for levels is much lower than it used to be.
@tonicasweps6 жыл бұрын
Why Matt Nass didn´t play silent graverstone in game 3?
@Kaowaul6 жыл бұрын
The commentators speculated that he might have been holding one in hand, waiting to draw a second so that he could cast one, have it get countered, and then play the second one after counters have been spent to ensure that it lands. They then add that he might have drawn the second on that draw step, since casting Surgical Extraction during your opponent's draw step can get you more value if they draw the card that you named. Another thought is that he was waiting to draw an Unburial Rites, which has to target, so he could get Griselbrand and use it to draw more cards.
@ShadowWasntHere84333 жыл бұрын
I would be pretty miffed if I was Reid after game 1, mad respect to lose with dignity
@StefanWB3 жыл бұрын
A top-level pro like Reid is going to know that an all-in combo deck like Tin Fins is going to have a very good win percentage in game one, and then see its percentage drop post-sideboard. He didn't have an interactive hand and the opponent had a T1 kill - it happens. But then he got to bring in his excellent hate pieces - Surgical, Bridge, etc. - and has tons of ways to find them thanks to cantrips, and that carried him to victory. So I think he probably thought he didn't have much of a reason to be miffed, because he knew unless he had some unlucky draws he was going to have a much better chance in the next two games.
@watertreatmentsolutions6 жыл бұрын
That judge should receive an infraction.
@Ohushi3 жыл бұрын
No both players did.
@MrMats176 жыл бұрын
Can someone explain to me what the game rule violation was for?
@Juggernuts6 жыл бұрын
it was for playing atarkas command without legal targets, (the gravestone prevented targeting stryx in gy) and the violation was for to my understanding some dumb shit about opponent not calling out the fact the targets were illegal the moment it happened?
@ulfsaar25836 жыл бұрын
Kolaghan's Command was casted and he used the first mode and third mode, which was 'Return target creature card from your graveyard to your hand' and 'Destroy target artifact'. Silent tombstone, which was the artifact, has a static ability where cards in graveyards cannot be targeted. So when Reid casted the Command, it was a game rule violation to take the Baleful Strix back because it was a illegal target
@cardsgamesandplay67786 жыл бұрын
@@Juggernuts it was stupid because reid explained that nass leaned in to look and they both didnt let the spell resolve. Soo nass shouldnt have gotten a failure to maintain game state since they didnt let the spell resolve. Dumb pedo judges.
@michaelsimoneau83646 жыл бұрын
in magic the gathering if you dont call out opponent error you are violating a rule of calling out opponent error. its simple the moment you get inside a event with DCI number you are a pro player and other pro player and judge expect the same from everyone so if you dont understand basic rule going into a tournament is legit dangerous for new player.
@cardsgamesandplay67786 жыл бұрын
@@michaelsimoneau8364 you watched it didnt you? There was almost no time in between reid casting k command and them realizing it wasnt a legal move for him to even call it out. He did mess up by putting the gravestone in the graveyard before pointing out that cards cant be targeted in graveyards lol. Wooops
@ethanicuscopernicus67583 жыл бұрын
Pretty funny, Reid casts an illegal card, but the judge blames Matt. Why didn't he just choose another mode with the Command?
@ZakanaHachihaCBC3 жыл бұрын
Reid got a Game Rule Violation because he cast the spell illegally. Matt got a Failure to Maintain Boardstate because he allowed Reid to cast the spell illegally and he wasn’t the one who called the judge on the illegal action.
@ethanicuscopernicus67583 жыл бұрын
@@ZakanaHachihaCBC but he didn't allow him to cast it, he caught the mistake right after he cast it, how the hell is he able to say, no you can't play that, before he even cast it?
@ZakanaHachihaCBC3 жыл бұрын
@@ethanicuscopernicus6758 The mistake was caught after they resolved the spell. This is comfirmed by both players as Matt moved his Gravestone from the battlefield to the graveyard and Duke his Strix from the graveyard to his hand. Because Matt allowed the spell to be cast, and resolve, with illegal targets and didn’t call the judge on the error, he gets a Failure to Maintain warning.
@ethanicuscopernicus67583 жыл бұрын
@@ZakanaHachihaCBC in addition they could have just had him choose a different mode with Kargaths Command, since there's like 4 modes, why did they put it back in his hand? some amateur players/judge right here.
@ZakanaHachihaCBC3 жыл бұрын
@@ethanicuscopernicus6758 The infraction was thé illegal casting of the K-Command, so the game was backed up to the point just before the infraction occurred. This is how it’s is outlined in the IPG.
@fistofsteel853 жыл бұрын
Nothing feels more demoralizing when you have to show your hand to your opponent lol
@vecvecvec3 жыл бұрын
pros tend to play with those cards in mind, theyre pretty ubiquitous
@guccimane37312 жыл бұрын
Game one is called “legal rape”
@isaiahgonzales61933 жыл бұрын
That was a garbage ruling. Matt didn't have time to maintain the gamestate there. I understand if he let the turn pass, then yea...
@animeexpresscon6 жыл бұрын
Its been a long time since I've played mtg tournies, did they change the rules around multi targeted spells? I remember around Ravinica block, that if you cast a spell with multiple targets and one or more targets are not legal targets, the spell would fizzel. At the time the that meant things like Hex and Rack and Ruin could be thwarted by making a single target illegal.. Did they change that rule at some point, -unwinding a spell cast on a spell that would have fizzeled on the stack doesn't make sense to me. i e, let the spell fizzel (because one target is illegal), then continue play. There shouldn't be a rules warning for what is in my mind a play mistake, not a rules infraction (unless like I mentioned, the rules have changed since I played). Feel free to comment if someone knows the rules surrounding multi-target spells.
@Nanofuture876 жыл бұрын
In order to put a spell on the stack in the first place it must have legal targets (for example, you can't simply decide to cast a counterspell with no spells to counter). If after that something happens to those targets (either they no longer exist or are no longer legal targets) then the spell fizzles when it goes to resolve.
@aftonlagrandeur57773 жыл бұрын
In game 3, why isn’t nass removing an ice counter at the end of every turn? With urborg, depths is a swamp and can tap for black, giving him 3 to remove a counter every turn on end step.
@al_kaufman3 жыл бұрын
Anyone else get Christian Bale as Bruce Wayne vibes from Reid? Similar face and speech if I do say so
@Slim33983 жыл бұрын
Started watching that dudes first turn and got so mad he could do all that
@rowdyruu82753 жыл бұрын
Its mainly why I'll never step foot in Legacy.
@mmmicroplastics3 жыл бұрын
Thing with combos like that is that the if the opponent as much as sneezes they fall apart
@StefanWB3 жыл бұрын
Tins Fins is an all-in combo deck that needs a specific sequence of cards in order to execute. You saw the potential power of the deck in game one, but there are major fragilities, specifically a) you need to aggressively mulligan if you don't have the right sequence of cards in your hand, and b) as Reid proved, there are a lot of hate pieces that players carry in their sideboard to deal with combo decks that work very effectively against the combo. And c) inexperienced played run the risk of messing up the combo due to sequencing errors or miscounting mana, but that's not something I would assume a pro like Nass would do. So on one hand, Legacy has these kinds of decks that can just go off. On the other hand, it also has the best interactive cards that can disrupt such combos. Force of Will (and now Force of Negation) is played by such a big portion of the metagame because it can just stop these kinds of combos and leave the combo player with almost no way to build themselves back to a winning position. Matt Nass's turn one win would literally not have been possible if Reid had a Force of Will+blue card to pitch. Nass won because his combo worked and Reid happened to have a non-interactive hand. It happens.
@MMarcuzzo6 жыл бұрын
I wish I knew the cards. I just played as a child.
@SunmasterThirteen4 жыл бұрын
22:29 Pirate!!
@blondiwithstyle3 жыл бұрын
This is why I despise combo decks. Duke took 3 seconds to make his play and pass the turn. Then, he had to sit and wait/watch for 8 minutes while Matt Nass took his turn.
@ericcolbenson55856 жыл бұрын
Ok... that seemed fun I guess.
@su0tin7316 жыл бұрын
It's awesome to hear what the players are saying, but other than that, the audio was terrible, we don't need to hear every announce they make on the hall, and the commentators can be heard at all. That's terrible.
@spaceranger1456 жыл бұрын
Su0T iN clearly you don't understand how microphones work
@su0tin7316 жыл бұрын
Well, if you do, try and get hired by wizards for these events, because they clearly need someone with your expertise.
@spaceranger1456 жыл бұрын
Su0T iN Yep, I got a degree in audio engineering, both players would need decent lav mikes but that would stop you from being able to hear the judge. CFB tried to hire me to work the GPs but I declined as I can't be in the same building as Rich Hagen because it would result in me going to prison for murdering the annoying overly opinionated fat fuck.
@thekevmeister77 Жыл бұрын
Time to get nassty
@mrantihippie6 жыл бұрын
Wait.. so if i don't catch my opponent making a mistake, i get punished too ? Both Matt and Reid handled the mistake well, but that judge kinda pissed me off lol.
@pendagar4496 жыл бұрын
C-C-C-COMBO BREAKER
@georgecolby74886 жыл бұрын
Both players were upstanding citizens. Judge was a dink.
@emilj68584 жыл бұрын
What did the judge do wrong in your opinion?
@ryanroberts54226 жыл бұрын
Seems unduly heavy a punishment. I don't agree with the judge's call here. There was no arguement.
@MattPlaysRs6 жыл бұрын
Likewise, I have cast a card in a similar way and was like oops, called a judge and the judge simply told me I can't cast the card so return it to my hand, after it had been revealed. At the very least, Matt getting a warning for that should not have happened.
@Rillant6 жыл бұрын
@@MattPlaysRs Judge here, the judge in question just followed the Infraction Procedure Guide, a document that tells us judges exactly what to do with common errors during gameplay at competitive tournaments. Matt received a warning for failure to maintain game state (section 2.6 of the IPG) and Reid received a warning for a game rules violation (section 2.5 of the IPG). At this level of play, holding up the integrity of rulings is extremely important, either everyone gets a warning for failure to maintain game state or noone, there's no cherry picking. But as the judge said, those warnings cannot be upgraded (as in, when you commit them several times they can not be upgraded to a game loss), so it was just a warning to be official.
@iana38924 жыл бұрын
@@Rillant it would seem the issue isn’t the judge, but the procedure guide.
@ChocciAdam6 жыл бұрын
Everyone here bashing the judge like they’re experts on CREL and the IPG, smh. It’s very simple. Reid committed a Game Rules Violation. Matt failed to catch the GRV, so he failed to maintain game state. Both receive warnings, but Matt’s is not upgradeable. Judge handled it perfectly.
@blitzkrogg25894 жыл бұрын
Right... I played legacy at my local game store for a year. Literally 15% of games ended turn 1 or 2. Why is it always different when you watch these tournaments. Seems like Rochester NY has many hidden pros.
@iNCoMpeTeNtplAyS3 жыл бұрын
Depends on a ton of things. The decks, the players, the knowledge of understanding sequencing, and the experience on how to deal with certain interactions in the game and of course if anyone misplace and if it gets caught.
@dionisoatlante64126 жыл бұрын
In competitive extended anyone can win on first turn, even in the 0 lol.
@ichweissnichtgenau924 жыл бұрын
Matt Nasty
@33shin332 жыл бұрын
8:41 Reid says it was a good game but it wasn't that good of game surely
@Voidmager2 жыл бұрын
So, Containment Priest actually DOES have applications here as more than just a flash-speed blocker; it can be used in response to a Delver of Secrets trigger to prevent the Insectile Aberration from entering the battlefield.
@AnonYmous-pl4rr2 жыл бұрын
Transform doesn’t make the creature leave play. You’re thinking of the Magic Origins planeswalkers, which it also doesn’t work on.
@MrRubixscube3 жыл бұрын
watch carefully at 43:55 + 3s , you won't regret it
@frasert87794 жыл бұрын
Jesus this makes it seem super easy to get DQ’d from a tournament if you make two pretty easy to make mistakes... I realise someone could cheat by doing it on purpose but still...
@Tacttactification3 жыл бұрын
It’s more likely to be a game loss if you only do two.
@frasert87793 жыл бұрын
@@Tacttactification Ah okay that makes sense I guess, is it difficult to get a DQ? Like it couldn’t reasonably happen from honest mistakes?
@googleplusisterrible48376 жыл бұрын
Matt's record is based on his skill. Not the deck. The deck is just straight bad. It has almost no consistency. Matt, really earned the 10-2 that got him here.
@iana38922 жыл бұрын
Skillless decks like Nass’ is the reason Legacy gets a bad rep. That and the reserve list.
@Mightypi2 жыл бұрын
Things like tin fins are real hard to play to it's full potential. Even more so in a field filled with free counter magic. I get it looks easy. But playing the deck out is hard In general, dedicated combo decks like this are substantially harder to play than any control deck.
@brianrouthier87893 жыл бұрын
Anyone notice Matt flicking Reid off the whole time lmao
@svenyproud6 жыл бұрын
not sure why Turtenwald went for Snapcaster after the Stifle to run into Daze. I would have Dazed the Stifle and play just the StP to play around Daze. If that didnt work he still would have got Snapcaster later. He removes Mandrills but it made like 8 damahe to him so TNN came much stronger in the game. Crucial mistake.
@nickfanzo3 жыл бұрын
Reid duke should know what can and can’t be targeted, he’s won big money playing.
@jasonjinx6 жыл бұрын
why do they constantly shuffle cards they are holding? some gay ass nervous tick that caught on ?
@EtienneDupuisMagog4 жыл бұрын
Turn 1 was disgusting. Poor Duke, I can feel the pain. I really hate that kind of plays/combo. At least Channel/Fireball combo back in the days ended things quickly.
@ihaveasnake6 жыл бұрын
Terrible judge
@badvoodoo20975 жыл бұрын
From a player like Reid duke he made a kologhans command missplay game two? He lives in red black x decks The judge call on an honest mistake and they called a judge for the call Amateur pros
@zeyro6668 ай бұрын
Fuck Eduardo is back. But it’s a Reid game so I have to watch. I’ll have to mute this one. I won’t hear Eduardo mispronounce every word known to man. “Deafrite shaman Feef of sanity Free cards in hand Foughtseize” I fink he’ll counter”
@rubenfigueiredo34587 ай бұрын
It's been an absolute riot reading these seething remarks about the way some dude talks.