Got My Mind Set On You - The Beatles - 1963 Version [ A.I. Vocals Cover inspired by Beatles ‘64 ]

[@TimmySean]

Also since it "tis the season", here's my "Wonderful Christmastime ‘67" re-imagining I released on Christmas Eve last year: kzbin.info/www/bejne/qofNfnWLpdtqqZo

[@ShoutingAllAboutLove]

This is SUBLIME 🎵🎵🎸🎸

[@empirejackson]

Can’t wait for the next ones

[@rec3de]

Great to see you back!!

[@normtheskull]

I know I should hate this but...Sorry...I love this. Now do Uncle Albert / Admiral Halsey from Paul as a beatle track. Great Work

[@TimmySean]

If it makes you feel any better, the only A.I. involved is after I record all of the instruments and sing all of the vocals, I just feed my vocal tracks through A.I. to match each Beatles voice, then plug them in place of my original vocals. It's all recorded and mixed like any other cover version otherwise.

[@SILVERPYGMEES]

Awesome!!! Great Guitar work on this mate! Love it!!

[@TimmySean]

Thanks!

[@doctorwhoproductions834]

Can’t wait, may I suggest ‘Grow Old With Me’ either 60s style or if they had done in the 90s

[@TheDylandProductions]

I second "Grow Old With Me." My favorite Lennon tune!

[@cowboys4life956]

Love it, sounds like it fits perfectly in the Live at the BBC collection.

[@tlatosmd7074]

Performance, maybe, but most of the BBC sessions lack these high production values and audio fidelity. Regarding production values, this could be an outtake from the "With The Beatles" sessions that ended up on the Anthology, but the performance sounds a bit earlier.

[@alexkx8599]

This is amazing and phenomenal!

[@boonesboroughbeachboy9341]

holy cow awesome wow. great job. thank you. amazing

[@moviemagg]

Great photos...

[@MariaHelenaCorreia-fo9ei]

It's a With the Beatles version. Awesome, Timmy! 🥰

[@georgeesau3943]

This is closer to the 1961 original than Georges cover .

[@arddijkman3289]

Great job. The drumpatern sounds like '63 and vocals like '64.

[@StrawberryFields24]

Sounds like it's come right out of the BBC Sessions - FAB!

[@Pedroisanickname]

Thia AI stuff is mind-blowing.

[@_-_Michael_-_]

Sounds like something of Anthology, good job. The track is something they would for sure play at long nights at cavern, not sure if it would be single in this form, but album track, why not.

[@josedelgadillo4804]

Strawberry Fields Forever version 64

[@wstks-fmworldwide5390]

Not bad!!! Not bad at all. It brought a smile to my face.

[@TheContemplater]

Wait for you, Timmy, thank you for magic job! 🎉

[@thechampestofthemall]

Nice

[@sweetnsourchick1761]

I love it!!!!! (I wonder what Paul and Ringo would think about your creations?) 👏 👏 👏

[@TimmySean]

Thanks! Probably to go write my own stuff haha (which I do though, so if anyone wants to check out that: timmysean.bandcamp.com/album/a-tale-from-the-other-side )

[@BAGHEAD1995]

Fantastic!.

[@thomashagenunger552]

sounds great.

[@cdoakley]

Bravo! This is brilliant! 👍

[@robertocolman]

sounds like a song from 50s, really good

[@timeomyside]

well done!!

[@alexkx8599]

Those two photos of, George, at 0:41 and 00:47 and awesome!

[@PaulMaxwell-u8m]

Thanks Timmy. Your stuff is fantastic and I really look forward to this. Have you considered another George song, A Picture of You?

[@francoisvanderlinden3756]

This is very interesting ... and it sounds like it could have been real ... except .... there's a little something ... every bit sounds too much like a song they DID record .... I can name every Beatles song where I've heard the same gimmick ... and you know, the Beatles tried to never repeat themselves (which they succeeded to do ... unlike their contemporaries) outstanding work nonetheless ...

[@TimmySean]

Thanks and also 100% fair! I almost didn’t release it because I had the same thought, but figured the fun of it outweighed any overuse of tropes. Also, justified it in my head that they did repeat a *little* in ‘62-63 vs. the years following (Ringo using the exact drum fill break in Wanna Hold Your Hand / Not A Second Time, the overall arrangement similarities of Please Please Me / There’s A Place, yadda yadda yadda), but I guess most importantly…I’m not The Beatles haha. 😂 I’d be happy to be a pale comparison to The Rutles with these. 😁

[@francoisvanderlinden3756]

@@TimmySean totally agree 👍

[@Jimmie_Rudolfsson]

Wow! Just wow. I would like a bit of a more "modern" mix as well with maybe at least some of the instruments spread across the channels.

[@jackabbott2202]

Jealous Guy 1969 version

[@LowerLenz]

Great! It sounds like you've also taken a bit of inspiration from James Ray's version. Am I right?

[@TimmySean]

Yup a bit! I originally tried to work in some of the sections that George omitted in the Cloud Nine version, but ended up deciding it should stay as short as possible to fit the ‘63 vibe.

[@Fancapcut]

🎉🎤🎸🎸🥁

[@caua8751]

Hey Timmy, where is the "original" 1964 version of Now and Then?

[@TimmySean]

Sadly got pulled with a Copyright Strike on my channel back in the spring. kzbin.info/www/bejne/bZzck3SlmN-IiK8

[@rudi1616]

👍👍😀😀👏👏yeah...............,.🖐🖐

[@pyro-gliffix1738]

Cool solo!!! I would love to hear a live version of Bad Boy. I always felt Bad Boy really captured their early edginess and had a cool punk vibe to it. Maybe like a king biscuit version.

[@DrStrange1995]

Please make a Ai cover Of Starting Over Beatles version

[@MarcoZucchi81]

It would be great! And John Lennon's "Woman" by the Beatles in '64 would be great aswell!

[@johnanthonycafe2993]

Years later George to his credit changed the skip beat in the vocal line and did this after the Beatles. The line ‘but it’s gonna take a money’ is a horrible sentiment.

[@Ptpop]

Doesn’t sound a bit like Cagney.

[@TimmySean]

@@Ptpop 😂👏👏

[@harrodsongs]

Why? No.

[@JhonHernandez-q4c]

Te aseguro que si los beatles hubieran hecho este cover harrison no hubiera cantado sino hubiera hecho lennon y mccartney

[@Borella309]

I'd would have prefered this to "Now and Then"

[@jooooooeee]

Needs more claps cmon AI

[@tlatosmd7074]

One can tell this was TTS rather than STS. Namely the vocals and partly the instruments sound way too mechanical and don't allow for the kind of slight flexibility required in timing, pitch, and attack or punch when the shifts in pitch and tempo occur that humans would perform automatically. This kind of robotic, lifeless, kitschy performance also emhasizes the incorrect association of The Beatles with shallow, hypercommercial bubblegum pop. I also have the impression the background vocals are a tad too deep in pitch and too wary or unenthusiastic, especially when they're singing actual words, not the kind of savage, zany, bubbly frenzy and enthusiastic exuberance that conquered the world in storm. It reminds me of what I've recently heard about their somewhat "leaden and uninspired" performance at the Decca audition which contributed to their failure of securing a record deal at Decca. But having said that, everything else is near-pitch perfect: Which instruments were used (down to the specific brands and models of guitars, amplifiers, and Ringo's Ludwig drumkit) and how they sounded independent of performance style, and the entire mixing and mastering. Basically, everything that George Martin would've arranged and the instrumentation choices of the lads themselves. And ignoring the uninspired, mechanical vocal performance (especially of the background vocals), the voices are spot-on, of course.

[@cmorales932]

Nice try.

[@user-mi1oh1bf2o]

You are going to have trouble with this grift. A Harrison track done by the boys? You boys and that damn software. Winston has already passed. How did he contribute? Discovery here we come. Winston on a Harrison track after Winston had passed. Good luck.

[@davidcashin1894]

this is sad

[@mattpunk931]

and why's that?