Gravity is Not a force it's an Illusion

Welcome to our riveting KZbin channel, where we embark on an extraordinary exploration of the universe's enigmatic mysteries through a captivating documentary-style journey. In this channel, we challenge conventional beliefs and take an in-depth look at the fundamental concept that "gravity is not a force."
Through thought-provoking documentaries, we'll navigate through the illusionary aspects of our cosmic surroundings, shedding light on the perplexing phenomena that captivate our imagination. Dive deep into the realm of physics and witness the profound revelations of general relativity, as we unveil the intricate workings of the universe.
From the breathtaking expanse of space to the mind-bending complexities of theoretical physics, each episode will take you on an awe-inspiring adventure. Whether you're an avid science enthusiast or simply curious about the wonders of the universe, our content is tailored to enlighten, engage, and intrigue.
Join us on this intellectually stimulating journey as we unravel the secrets of the cosmos, unveiling the beauty and complexity that lies beyond the stars. Subscribe now and embark on an enthralling documentary experience that will leave you in awe of the universe's grandeur. 🚀🌌📺

[@thealchemist2792]

"Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistent one." ~ Einstein

[@davidmudry5622]

Einstein's 'Equivalence Principle', is it true or not? A massive amount of new technologies were developed in the 20th century. Of the 100 chosen candidates, Albert Einstein was chosen as the Person of the 20th Century. In a century filled with scientists, he was the paramount scientist. As documented in Section 6.14.4 of NIST NCSTAR 1, these collapse times show that: "The WTC 9/11 building section above at the top came down essentially in free fall." The Equivalence Principle says in a local area there are no forces in free fall, gravity does not pull down. And therefore there would be very little forces going on in a collapse that was measured at, and agreed to by NIST who said, the collapse was almost in free fall. Very little gravity because 100% weight became 36% weight during the downward acceleration of the collapse. kzbin.info/www/bejne/e57Vi2aQlr2giZY

[@ClintMcCaleb]

The voice over absolutely makes this channel. I love the narrator's voice, and cadence.

[@steviereedeker3314]

It felt pretty real while I was tumbling down the stairs.

[@davidmudry5622]

Einstein's 'Equivalence Principle', is it true or not? A massive amount of new technologies were developed in the 20th century. Of the 100 chosen candidates, Albert Einstein was chosen as the Person of the 20th Century. In a century filled with scientists, he was the paramount scientist. As documented in Section 6.14.4 of NIST NCSTAR 1, these collapse times show that: "The WTC 9/11 building section above at the top came down essentially in free fall." The Equivalence Principle says in a local area there are no forces in free fall, gravity does not pull down. And therefore there would be very little forces going on in a collapse that was measured at, and agreed to by NIST who said, the collapse was almost in free fall. Very little gravity because 100% weight became 36% weight during the downward acceleration of the collapse. kzbin.info/www/bejne/e57Vi2aQlr2giZY

[@MilkoOfficialChannel]

@davidmudry5622 The 9/11 WTC event was a controlled demolition. You should know by now. The "airplanes" stunts were the theatrics, a distraction. Though an airplane would’ve become an accordion when crashing against a wall of concrete and steel beams of such caliber…you should know too. The twin towers where built airplane crash proof, and coincidentally the airplane model used in the blueprint calculations for that matter was the same that allegedly crashed.

[@ecmswagger]

In The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy, Douglas Adams wrote that the trick to flying is to "throw yourself at the ground and miss."

[@ditto1958]

@@ecmswaggerYes. Never tried it in real life, but I’ve had vivid dreams a couple of times where I could fly. 😊

[@williamtell5365]

In reality, it is more correct to say the stairs were moving up on you. Seriously.

[@Danboi.]

Sometimes i like to tilt my head and look at everything upside down and see how stuff is pulled to the earth. 🙃

[@Hydroverse]

You do that too.

[@Danboi.]

@@Hydroverse 😂👊 You mean I'm not the only nut who geeks out in gravity?

[@Hydroverse]

@@Danboi. You're not alone. I've done that quite a few times.

[@Danboi.]

@@Hydroverse it gives a great perspective on how strong the the "week force" is.. the day we learn how to artificially recreate it...wow possibilities are endless

[@Hydroverse]

@@Danboi. Agreed.

[@eddominates]

great visuals to accompany the explanation. good job

[@nutterbutter1133]

Thank you for daring to challenge logic and reason as we know it. Only you, a denizen of the deep American South has the courage, the sheer perspicacity to tear down the logic of a thousand years of painstaking research and experiment with these groundbreaking, paradigm-shattering insights into our reality. The real crime here is that only 6.5K people have deigned to drink from this pool of deep deep wisdom. All this time, whenever I've dropped something or saw something fall to the ground, imagine my shock to now know that it was just an illusion. It didn't really happen! MINDBLOWING!!!

[@Danchell]

Very thought provoking. This will occupy my mind for weeks. Thank you.

[@willbrink]

We need a breakthrough in the understanding of gravity and time.

[@nutier]

Awesome video ! I love it so much . Thank you for sharing . Happy week to you !

[@roland702r]

Thanks for sharing laws of gravity relating to keplars laws. Physics was one of my favorite classes in school😃👍 I still remember how my professor explained, elaborated how gravity works within our atmosphere. Your focusing more on how gravity works above our atmosphere, which I find quite intriguing🤔

[@davidmudry5622]

No, gravity does not work differently within the atmosphere. Every force on an object gives the object weight as an equal and opposite force. Standing on a Bus you get thrown backwards as the Bus starts forward, and thrown forward as the Bus starts to stop. In between you are okay at a constant speed. In free fall there is no weight, therefore there is no force, no action reaction. A Einstein.

[@fiorintinocogin1187]

as was the message of the gravity of the sit u at ion we are all in...gravity is appearing to be what the sun set is ... a bad idea expressed in bad language by people with other things to do than pay attention to what is real and who can make up a good story the sun as you may not be aware does not set nor does it rise it is the motion of the earth at some combination of 301,000 miles per hour at the end of three strings moving in three directions in a fourth direction causing the apparent rise and set of the big yellow ball you are not supposed to look at and that doesn't include the video you are commenting on so better to watch it and listen and may be list the items described so as not to put the matter where the wave belongs on the shopping list and come home with another package of baloney when the sales professional told you it was prime rib at the price you paid

[@davidmudry5622]

@@fiorintinocogin1187 Einstein's 'Equivalence Principle', is it true or not? A massive amount of new technologies were developed in the 20th century. Of the 100 chosen candidates, Albert Einstein was chosen as the Person of the 20th Century. In a century filled with scientists, he was the paramount scientist. As documented in Section 6.14.4 of NIST NCSTAR 1, these collapse times show that: "The WTC 9/11 building section above at the top came down essentially in free fall." The Equivalence Principle says in a local area there are no forces in free fall, gravity does not pull down. And therefore there would be very little forces going on in a collapse that was measured at, and agreed to by NIST who said, the collapse was almost in free fall. Very little gravity because 100% weight became 36% weight during the downward acceleration of the collapse. kzbin.info/www/bejne/e57Vi2aQlr2giZY

[@willbrink]

Atmosphere has no bearing on gravity.

[@wizzardofpaws2420]

I very much enjoy your videos.

[@pascalguerandel8181]

So is my going to the bathroom is a wet illusion....😂😂😂😂😂

[@petersvancarek]

It all depends how we define the force. Depending on definition... other forces may lose its "force status" Electromagnetic force is mediated through photon. What if we define force as something not mediated by particle? But it need to be mediated through space-time continuum? Also, what if we find that the hypothetical gravitons really do exist and they cause all of this, both the attraction and the space-time deformation? We feel the gravity thanks to electromagnetic force. Because it is electromagnetic force that doesn't allow us to fall through the ground into the center of gravity well... or to be penetrated by any objects without injury.

[@davidmudry5622]

F = ma every force has an equal and opposite force. The scale accelerates you up, your weight does not want to go up, it resists going up. In free fall there is nothing accelerating you up, you're weightless.

[@petersvancarek]

@@davidmudry5622 You would feel that acceleration if falling through strong gravity field. Neutron star or black hole. Because the differential acceleration depending on distance of falling object from object with extreme gravity well depth is so high that it can destroy even molecules... You are accelerated uniformly, therefore in shallow gravity field you can't feel it or measure it. The inertia works against gravity acceleration- irrespectively of the mass- it doesn't matter what mass the object has, it accelerates the same way.

[@GuerrasLaws]

The origin of momentum creation is founded on the application of energy. Momentum serves as the initial cause of pushing and pulling. The energy, emanating from the internal core of a planet, is what gives rise to momentum, commonly referred to as gravity, and not due to the planet’s size, mass, or space-time curvature. For example, when energy is applied, it generates the necessary momentum for the actions of pushing and pulling. Without the application of energy, momentum cannot be established. Consequently, force cannot be exerted for pushing and pulling, as it lacks a physical existence. This, in turn, clarifies why force is not gravity. ~Guadalupe Guerra

[@jackspence625]

Mordehai Milgrom's formula is very interesting. Is he simply curve fitting past events, however? It will be interesting to see the arguments for and against his theory.

[@Hydroverse]

I have a question: where does the heat that is from friction between the air and water during precipitation come from? I know it is gravitational acceleration being dissipated as heat, but that heat from friction differs from the heat of evaporation. It's not from converting mass into energy like fusion or oxidation.

[@benjamindees]

I don't want to minimize your question by answering it. Because it is important to think about. But the short answer is that it's still just gravitational potential energy. Those molecules happen to start out in a gaseous phase, high in the atmosphere. But they retain their gravitational potential energy even after condensing into a liquid, just by virtue of still being high in the atmosphere. And when they fall to the ground, it's like a giant game of Plinko as they collide with other molecules and dissipate that energy.

[@erebology]

For all things falling at terminal velocity through a fluid, the upwards force due to friction equals the downwards weight of the object. We know this because the raindrop is not accelerating when it is at terminal velocity. The friction equals the weight of the rain.

[@erebology]

The heat due to falling is tiny, I suspect. The friction comes from water moving against stationary air molecules and rubbing on the air.

[@brandonhodnett5420]

Just because it’s not a ‘force’ doesn’t make it illusory, are the effects of jumping off a cliff an illusion?

[@aneikei]

Firstly @11:40 Mercury's perihelion shifts by 43 arcseconds not angular seconds. Secondly @12:11 if the wavelength of the light is elongated then the light would shift from blue to red, not red to blue.

[@WorldTour.360]

I imagine the gravity like this, which I'll describe below. Imagine! One pool filled with water. Now you have thrown a stone in the middle of this pool and this caused it to create a wave and this wave started to move to reach to the edge at some speed But suddenly a swirl became to existence at the center of the pool and started to absorb the water inside. If it absorbs the water at the high rate rather than the speed of the wave, then these waves never reach to the edge. Instead they swollen inside the swirl. So. Here the pool is the universe, water is the space, wave is light and swirl is a mass which effects on the gravity

[@Pomorchik]

Having created the special theory of relativity, Einstein generalized it into the general theory of relativity, including gravity. According to the general theory of relativity, massive bodies bend space-time, which causes gravitational interactions. At the same time, the nature of gravity and acceleration is the same - we can feel acceleration or gravity if we make a curvilinear movement in space-time.

[@davidknapp5224]

What FORCE creates a singularity if not gravity?

[@kennyc3670]

Apparently we're not being pulled down but are accelerating upwards.

[@samlazar1053]

ITS NOT AN ILLUSION. ITS A PARTICLE INTERACTION. THE MORE PARTICLES ARE INTERACTING THE MORE GRAVITY YOU GOT

[@thekingofmojacar5333]

I am absolutely convinced that gravity exists, but we still don't understand all the physical laws of our universe, our human consciousness is quite limited in this material short term life adventure on planet earth...

[@stewiesaidthat]

The laws of physics are equally valid in all frames of reference. Draw a line from the apple in the tree to the ground and the turn the frame on its side. Now do you get the picture. The apple fell off the truck and smashed into the car traveling behind it. The car being the ground. The earth is not flat people. It's curved. There is no up other than increased rates of acceleration. The apple doesn't fall, it stops accelerating and gets run over by the next frame with sufficient force to accelerate it.

[@bozydarziemniak1853]

Why gravity exists. Starting from Newton's second law of motion: F=m*a F - force vector [N] m - mass [kg] a - acceleration vector [m/s] However, introducing the concept of the Lorentz force taking into account only magnetic interactions: F=qv x B F - force vector [N] q - charge [C] v - velocity vector [m/s] x - vector product operation B - magnetic induction vector [B] If F=qv x B, then we can also write: F=q*v*sine(alpha)*B, where alpha is the angle between vectors v and B for alpha=90 degrees, sine(alpha)=1 F=q*v*B F/(q*v)=B comparing this equation to the second law of dynamics we have: m*a/(q*v)=B since a/v=1/t, then: m/(q*t)=B 1/t=omega (omega is circular frequency [1/s]) m*omega/q=B Substituting the calculated value of B into the Lorentz force, we have: F=q*v x m*omega/q Equating the Lorentz force to the force resulting from Newton's second law of dynamics, we get: m1*a=q*v x m2*omega/q Where: m1 - mass of the object subjected to gravity [kg] m2 - mass of the object generating gravity [kg] If the left side of the equation corresponds to gravitational interaction, then on the right side we have its cause. The cause of gravitational interactions is the translational and rotational motion of particles with mass and charge, and the proportionality coefficients of these two motions, with a constant acceleration value, are q and m/q. In the special case when the value of the angle between the velocity vector and the circular frequency pseudovector is equal to 90 degrees. We can write briefly: m1/m2*a=v*omega The cause of gravity is the translational and rotational motion of massive particles. Gravity exists because every massive particle in our world is in motion (this results from the laws of thermodynamics).

[@1973vanguard]

And the answer is quantum computing. The reason why we are unable to bring the gap between General relativity and quantum mechanics is because we haven't had a computer powerful enough to make the calculations needed. Ones and zeros are not enough. We need to use atoms to calculate atoms. And quantum computing is the answer.

[@roberttarquinio1288]

Gravitation is a manifestation of space time curvature

[@cosmichappening1712]

Wrong: The Cavendish experiment first performed by English scientist Henry Cavendish in 1779-1798 proves that gravity is a pulling force generated by massive objects.

[@TheTruth1sPower]

Gravity is relative to a planets electromagnetic core. A field of that size effects anything within it that contains atoms.

[@ArtisticLogic]

Gravity is not a force and gravity does not pull. All the bright scientific minds here go take another read of Einstein's very clearly explained definition of how gravity behaves. No body of mass is being pulled or dragged once it interacts with the fabric of space-time...

[@ericreid8111]

Gravity bends space time. Its forcing space time to bend. Therefore, its a force.

[@phineascromwell]

That is a pseudoscientific thought experiment, and it reifies non-existent, non-physical conditions.

[@paulbennett7021]

No, it causes space time to curve

[@garypippenger202]

An illusion that can be measured and, thru mathematics, predicted. I don't think we're using the word "illusion" in the same way, and no wonder few understand (the illusion of) Gravity!

[@dexter8705]

Equivalence principle, accelerating in a rocket through space and you standing on earth and space accelerating through you is equivalent.

[@stewiesaidthat]

The laws of physics are equally applicable in all frames of reference. Vertical. Horizontal. Curved. Only a moron like Einstein would think that you have different laws of physics for different frames of reference. This is where collective stupidity comes from. First Newton with his brilliant laws of motion with acceleration as the force multiplier. Then goes off the rails with his gravitational attraction using mass as the force carrier. Einstein. Same exact thing. The properties of light make it an absolute. Is constant. Is the same for all observers. Travels in its own frame. Then he goes off the rails with his 'special relativity' . Utter nonsense. You can tell exactly which is the preferred frame of reference. If the theory doesn't work in all frames, it's an invalid theory. Relativitists have become the new flat Earthers. Mocked and ridiculed for centuries to come.

[@michaelkahn8744]

Dark Matter, Dark Energy, Gravity, Void and Antigravity, ... all these are same phenomena. They just look different. Alternative Explanation of Dark Matter and Dark Energy - 4-D Hypershere model of Universe can easily explain Gravitarion, Dark Matter, Dark Energy, Void and even the reason why the measurement values of Expansion Rate are around 70 km/sec-Mpc Dark Matter, Dark Energy, Gravity, Void and Antigravity, ... all these are same phenomena. They just look different. The problem of modern physics is they're trying to explain everything with particle physics and the physics is being cornered more and more to the dead end. To escape the dead end, they invent or design another imaginary particle in vain instead of trying to revise their way to approach to the problem. I agree to the idea that the interaction between mass and space must be explained with quantum mechanics. But that doesn't mean gravity is the QM phenomena. That's because gravity is not a force. Dark Matter, Dark Energy, Gravity, Antigravity, Void... all these are just joint effects of the expansion of the Universe and the curvature of spacetime. Details are given below. Einstein’s theory of General Relativity states that spacetime is curved by the presence of mass. This curvature influences the motion other objects with mass and gives rise to gravitation. Thus, gravity is a result of geometric features in spacetime. However, we also observe gravitational effects - curvature of spacetime - in areas without any detectable mass. This has given rise to the concept of dark matter, which is matter that does not interact in any detectable way with normal matter, except through gravity. So, there is some large quantity of dark matter scattered throughout the universe, which curves spacetime and causes gravitational effects just like normal matter, but we cannot see or detect it with any known method. An alternative theory to the identity of dark matter is proposed - it is not matter at all, but rather an intrinsic curvature of spacetime. In other words, spacetime is not naturally flat. Even in the absence of matter, we observe some inherent curvature of spacetime. So, the question is now - why is spacetime naturally curved? Why is it not flat in the absence of mass? The universe is 4-dimensional, with 3 spatial dimensions and one dimension in time. Rather than consider time as a linear dimension, we can consider it as a radial one. Therefore, rather than describing the universe with a Cartesian coordinate system, we describe it with a 4-dimensional spherical coordinate system - 3 angular coordinates, φ1, φ2, φ3, and one radial coordinate in time, t. We live on the 3-dimensional surface of a 4-dimensional bubble which is expanding radially in time. Thus, the Big Bang represents t=0, the beginning of time. The crucial point is that the expansion of the universe is not homogeneous in all directions. The expansion rate at one point on the bubble’s surface may differ slightly from another point near it. The universe is only roughly spherical in 4 dimensions, the same way that the Earth is only roughly spherical in 3 dimensions. The same way we observe local mountains and valleys on the surface of Earth, we observe local “mountains” and “valleys” on the surface of the universe bubble. The inhomogeneity of the expansion of the universe has given rise to natural curvature of spacetime. This natural curvature causes the phenomenon of “dark matter”. “Valleys” in spacetime pull matter in, similarly to the warping of spacetime of massive objects. So “dark matter” is really “valleys” in spacetime that are expanding slower than the regions surrounding it. These valleys tend to pull matter in and create planets, stars, and galaxies - regions of space with higher-than-average densities of mass. Conversely, “mountains” in spacetime will repel matter away, an “anti-gravitational” effect, which gives rise to cosmic voids in space where we observe no matter. Each point on the surface of the universe bubble traces out a time arrow in 4-dimensional space, perpendicular to the surface. These time arrows are not parallel to each other since the universe is not flat. This causes points to have nonzero relative velocity away from each other. It is generally accepted that the universe is expanding faster than observable energy can explain, and this is expansion is believe to be still accelerating. The “missing” energy required to explain these observations has given rise to the theory of dark energy. The time dilation caused by non-parallel time arrows can be proposed as an explanation for dark energy. Alternatively, dark energy is real energy coming from potential energy gradients caused by non-parallel time arrows. As a sanity check, we can calculate the expansion rate of the universe based on the universe bubble model. Since the radius of the universe bubble is expanding at the speed of light in the time direction, it increases at 1 light second per second. Therefore, the “circumference” of the 3-dimensional surface increases by 2π light seconds per second, or about 1.88*10^6 km/s. This expansion is distributed equally across the 3-dimensional surface, so the actual observed expansion rate is proportional to the distance from the observer. At present, the age of the universe is estimated to be 13.8 billion years, so the radius of the universe bubble is 13.8 billion light years, or about 4233 megaparsecs (3.26 million light years to 1 Mpc). Thus, we can calculate the expansion rate of the universe, per megaparsec from the observer, as: Expansion rate = ((d(circumference))/dt)/radiusofuniverse=(1.88*〖10〗^6 km⁄s)/(2π*4233Mpc)=(1.88*〖10〗^6 km⁄s)/26598Mpc=70.82(km⁄s)/Mpc The popularly accepted empirical expansion rate is 73.5 +/- 2.5 km/s/Mpc, so our calculated value is close. There may be some additional source of expansion (or observed red shift) to make up for the discrepancy. For example, if two adjacent points have some gravitational gradient due to non-parallel time arrows, then light passing through these points will be red-shifted. - Cited from www.academia.edu/82481487/Title_Alternative_Explanation_of_Dark_Matter_and_Dark_Energy

[@ThanikaSalamT-fy1ms]

Earth gravity is most important role on Gas-Liquid-Solid in the earth

[@markeelaino9858]

Flat earthers gonna hate this...

[@jenburkholder6541]

Why doesn't everything in the universe gravitate towards one point of mass and become so dense that it turns us into something the size of a turd?

[@zeroonetime]

It I.S. another form of G.P.S. ~~ Gravitational Propulsion Systems.

[@jossarian]

Physics describes measurable events - data - , not the "nature" of events. If I have: F = ma, then I measure F, m and a, respektively, and the = sign makes this to - Newton's - law and I "name" F: force.

[@Oldschool811]

Put a bowling ball on your mattress and a tennis ball next to it the tennis ball will gravitate to the bowling ball my best analogy of space and gravity

[@Hydroverse]

The only issue is that you're using gravity to do that.

[@erebology]

The bowling ball on the bed gravity model is the biggest misconception in Physics and it should be discarded.

[@Oldschool811]

It's just a visual representation to perhaps children and the uneducated that is all!!!! I didn't mean to imply it had any scientific merit.

[@tomgrimes8379]

Andrea Ghez, not Gez.

[@ValMartinIreland]

There is no such thing as an object. There is just a collection of atoms.

[@jayb5596]

You are alive right now, your body is resisting entropy. When you die what happens to your body? It decays and entropy takes control and the body gives way to decay. What happens to a star when it dies, the same thing the star gives way to entropy? Gravity because its a conscious measurement which requires atleast machine level logical processing, that absolutely requires a God to either perform the calculation or to build the logical processor to perform the calculation. To be specific it's called node edging weighted and unweighted measure. Gravity is a logical operation. It is a force but it's applied through logical processes. The reason gravity is a force is because it applies weight to mass, which is why your physical body weight depends on the strength of the gravitational field of the planetary body you are at rest in. Inside the proton are lots of tiny little packets of energy or conscious measurements being applied to our mass by earths gravitational field through vectors. This represents node edging weighted and unweighted. When you are in freefall your body is in a state of unweighted measure, which simply means the force that would normally apply weight to your mass is instead accumulative across vectors while you are at rest in space. In freefall because you aren't resisting earths gravitational field in free fall, it's accumulative, when you are in freefall all that force even though you can't feel it, is accumulating as you fall and upon impact when you find rest again all that force catches up to you. We already know the measurement thanks to newton. When you are at rest in space (freefall) instead of opposing gravitational force over time increments you accumulate force over time. For example I am on earth constantly resisting gravity so the force dissapates out. When I am in freefall I am not resisting the force, so I am accumulating force across vectors which will be applied when you come to rest with earths field again. We defeat this by opposing forces like a parachute resist gravity (using earths atmosphere) essentially earths own energy to dissapate the force preventing it from accumulating, it prevents a persons body from accumulating all that force on the way down because they were at rest in space. If you are at rest in space you are accumulating force from earths gravitational field and when earth catches back up to you and you find rest with earth which is in motion not at rest in space. Well you get the point. Take an infrared measurement of an active processor and power that processor off, Continue to monitor the heat dissapating you now have a visual idea of why stars leave a core to radiate.

[@Out_of-_Box_Thinker]

The actual cause of gravity explained here: kzbin.info/www/bejne/Y3rVdqOIr6pnm68

[@YSLRD]

Still looking for, " Gravity for Dummies". So much assumed base knowledge. Either this idea is misdirected or nobody knows how to simplify the concept.

[@bertnout9959]

Jan Oort was not Danish. He was Dutch.

[@karlmoody4891]

I like 'em both

[@renesoucy3444]

Does that means that the term gravitational waves is also delusional? I doubt that…

[@Jackie-wn5hx]

Gravity as a force that all inertia observers agree upon is the illusion. Gravitational waves are never called illusions.

[@ohara89]

If each force has an equal and opposite reaction, explain gravity. It must be an illusion.

[@stewiesaidthat]

Gravity is caused by acceleration. The mass of one frame of reference pushing on the mass of another frame of reference creates Gravity. What causes light to slow down is not Gravity, its an electromagnetic field interacting with the electromagnetic wave.

[@DUTCH-CHRISTIAN2008]

Everything is an illusion

[@jaymzs8221]

And I thought I was reading your comment…. Now I find your comment was just an illusion. How disappointing..or should I say a disappointment to you. It doesn’t bother me…. I’m just an illusion. What?

[@OneRuthless]

gravity is real ... not an illusion

[@Brewerhaus]

The Warp. If we can predict then rules exist. If rules then is it designed or one set in one Universe where every permutation exist. Either decision is at its core a faith until all that is to be known is defined. But at that point you will have only defined the design Universe decision and in doing so proven the version of thought of all is not designed and is random to be wrong. Seems very boolean to me. Especially given that random is a definable rule.

[@RuelDomalaon-fy3hf]

Antigravity house is inside the gapping zone, and the nature's way out to ends life. Why ? Matters can enters only and no solid and water , if you are inside the house you can walk in the ceiling in side by side and walk to the main . All around you is a gapping zone area . And Antigravity way. No gravity can peneterate. You ate in another level like you are not in earth , all your surrounding is aged and you don't aged . All life is going to ends nature's way and you are not affected, just take care of you body . Gravity takes life and ends life . I can see to stop aged , Want it 100m $ first.

[@RuelDomalaon-fy3hf]

Gravity is a natural force , you can't feel it but it does, full what ? The time and date it's counting up to your end , It's a nature's way to ends life , Me I can give you not counting you're way of life , You can live longer and you can ages thousand or more ? Want me to share ? It's a construction designing of a house

[@edimbukvarevic90]

It's an acceleration (g in m/s^2) and therefore a force too (W in N or kg*m/s^2). It's clearly a force (also called weight).

[@Synthematix]

Gravity is the direct product of weight

[@Ryan-gx4ce]

No. Weight is a direct product of gravity.

[@anthonydoyle7370]

@@Ryan-gx4ce The gravitas of the subject will lend weight to your argument.

[@karlmoody4891]

A more accurate description would be this: Gravity is the indirect product of weight, while weight is the direct consequence of gravity.

[@PrometheusZandski]

Unfortunately, you came to the conclusion that gravity is not a force without providing a definition for what a force is. In the Newtonian sense a force is anything that causes a change in the velocity of an object. Then gravity is a force. In the quantum sense a force is the emission or absorption of a scalar boson by a fermion that results in the change of energy and momentum. Then we aren't sure if gravity is a force because we have never found a scalar boson that relates to gravity. As you never explained how mass/energy warps spacetime, we don't know if gravity is a force or simply a side effect of spacetime dilation. BTW, at 10:49 you say that gravity does not work on the light itself, but gravity works on energy density, not just mass. Massless particles create spacetime dilation and are very much affected by it.

[@stewiesaidthat]

Those sugar plumbs are really dancing in your head. Gravity is the resistance to acceleration. The earth rotating on its axis creates curved space. The earth rotating on its axis creates the day/night cycle giving as the concept of time. There is no gravitational attraction. Only electromagnetic as shown by Quantum Machinics. Mass is inert. It has no force without acceleration. Something both Newton and Einstein didn't fully comprehend. Newton tried to give force to mass and Einstein countered with his warped space nonsense. You relativists have been 180 degrees off target ever since. What did you get wrong? Mass decreases with acceleration. F=ma/E=mc. Time experienced increases with acceleration as proven by accelerated heart rates and objects accelerated in space losing mass from heat(force). You are being accelerated outwards and forwards from the center of the Earth's rotation causing curved space. Relativists are so blind to the fundamental error of assuming mass has a force unto itself that you can't see how messed up your reality is. Space and Time are separate reference frames because you can control the time aspect with a counterforce such as cryostasis. Which is exactly what atomic clocks do. Prevent the atom from being accelerated in time when a force is applied so that it can accurately measure its motion in the Space frame.

[@fiorintinocogin1187]

3:06 start here the earth as most people seem to now be aware due to apple watches and other things which are expensive and have very short useful lives takes about 24 hours to spin something as small as one of the 8,000,000,000 heads rolling around on the blue dot these days one complete circle around itself and as it turns out the distance covered by a length called a radius is about three times twice the radius leading to a n oddly odd 3:2 ratio but that is not the matter is it the wave that matters and so while you have a blue ball spinning at about 1000 miles per hour you certainly want to point the cannon to the west as that is where the action is ... but you have to question what the newty was newton on as the 4500 mile per hour speed that the theoretical ball of iron is supposed to fly is about four and a half times as fast as the apple that newty was noodling on which makes about zero sense and explains the rest of the nonsense at a finer point by pointing out the one thing which aside from the idea that in a system moving 1000 miles per hour this way and at a 186,000,000 mile diameter bumped up by 3 to the distance traveled in a year by the blue ball of spinning nonsense it takes about 365 days of 24 hours each to traverse the 186*3=558 million miles at about 63,000 miles per hour in the next yearly direction and the third thing which you never see any nice complicated abbreviations for is the speed at which the solar system within which the blue ball system within which the apple failing to follow some other idea is moving at not a fixed speed of motion less ness in spite of newtyz zzz ness as he wakes from the dream you can not actually calculate the speed that the larger idea is moving at given the distances to be traveled over the span of space over which this imaginary trip will occur but according to the shiny pennies pulling down LHC sized paychecks to tell you what is what the guess is somewhere on the order of 240,000 miles per hour just to keep the numbers in the ball park...and the time to get around once is fun da mentally useless to fathom so you have an apple moving at 240,000 + 63,000 + 1,000 miles per hours in three directions at one moment and everything surrounding the apple is moving at least as fast in at least the three previously divided attention spans resulting in not some magical force that just happens to wake up a sleeping crackpot looking for worms to fill tequila bottles with butt head in the direction of the moon and find that every thing in the vicinity of nothing in the vacuous space filled with clear gasses gassing up the place until you have solid balls of oxygen floating around the blue ball of oxygen deprived calculator carriers means nothing in terms of the friction felt by the rotating rotations at varii radii at all 9:07 a better way of thinking of time given the nature of time as the relationship between a radius and a curve scraped out by an infinitely thin collection of lines defining the imaginary line defining two points in any space anywhere is to thing about musak and how in four quarter time one can play a back beat at a triple step that will get your granny out of the rocking chair faster than a fig newton disappears from a freshly flayed package of the most useful idea of a newt on toast ever dreamed up by anyone... the diameter of the yellow/gold colored thing you are not supposed to look at is 432,000 miles which in cycles per second is music at a particular note and a frequency defined by the speed of the light that generally speaking tends to fly off the surface of the sun at some radius or rate which when one gets ones head out of the cookie jar is one of the four factors in how a fig newton gets into a package of fig newtons to begin with which is the critical point defined by the critical moment at which it will not depend on the distance from the center see however it has several serious problems because ... well it has nothing to any other imaginary dream such as black holes those are the seeds from the figs which get stuck in the spaces between the teeth and cause the black holes in the teeth that people at that time used to make out of wood because that was the best idea available at the time and it looks like your nice collection of imaginary pictures is ended now with absolutely no information useful to anyone of the 8,000,000,000 heads rolling around on the floor right now...thanks for nothing at least we didn't have to wait as long as the other 8,000,000,000 people who all think that the people pulling down large LHC sized paychecks are putting their money to some sort of useful use based on the solidly accepted and thoroughly misunderstood statement meant to say that nothing is not moving faster than any one of the 8,000,000,000 heads moving that fast could possibly imagine moving in reality and no one has a clue even how to possibly imagine that obviously given the pretty idiotic suggestion that a cannon ball could have been fired out of a cannon a few hundred years ago at 4500 miles per hour using anything other than a wildly overactive imagination in need of another outlet for the excess energy all that hard pressed apple cider was having on who ever it was that was sitting around thinking about what to do with all the apples laying around on the ground down ground and where the entire line of thought is actually going as a secondary consideration which might matter and might be a wave which is where the whole thing is headed as it always was always is and always will be for eva and eva after amen

[@3Designlab]

Jan Oort is Not danish,, do your homework

[@lancethrust9488]

THE CONSTANT LIES FROM THE MAINSTREAM

[@colleendougherty4475]

einstein is so wrong for example if space really did push it would be the same as if we were all of a sudden placed under water you would feel the crushing push of the water . but gravity from mass the gravitons wave passes through your body it would pull you from inside out to the mass or the ground . that is what we are we are experencing not being pushed we can feel the difference sorry einstein . besides if space pushed the tides wouldnt work it wiould be a even push from all arount there would be no buldge , but gravity from mass the sun and the moon pulling on the ocean causes that budge so i hate to say it einstein but you wrong . gravity is fron mass and it pulls sorry . Reply

[@ChristopherRyans]

Gravity is so weak

[@dmahan8841]

This is all completely wrong. I can't believe they can't figure this out. It's 2024 guys. Gravity is not a force. Space does not bend. Time is linear. And gr is a joke. Sr. Worse. Geometry allows for only one solution with these correct parameters....

[@KenDWebber]

You are wrong. Gravity is none of that. Gravity is DISPLACEMENT. You're in outer space in zero g. Before you is a giant ball of water. Place a penny on the surface. The penny will DISPLACE the water and go to the center in an attempt to BALANCE. Take a syringe with air and inject the center of the ball. The water will DISPLACE the air and force it outwards where the air will settle (BALANCE) around the ball as an atmosphere. You can do this will all the elements in the chart. They will all rise or fall in an attempt to BALANCE and DISPLACING other elements in the process. DISPLACEMENT is gravity and that IS A MEASURABLE FORCE!

[@vijaysstudio]

Ya it is. I just need to know shit, relative to my world,... my immediate environment. What do I care about my ass relative to the universe. Besides... you just said "gravity lines are set by earth",.... as in earth's gravitational force. EVERYONE deals with gravitational forces, every day.

[@strangevideos3048]

Its a force ,sorry 😊

[@Jackie-wn5hx]

You can't make that argument without first defining "force."

[@strangevideos3048]

@@Jackie-wn5hx Force just like magnetic or nuclear force between particles.More particles ->gravity force is stronger very simple.Today everyone wants to be a theorist. Theory is not fact. Many theories have failed, many theories are absolute lies. Scientists have no idea about anything trust me.

[@stewiesaidthat]

​@@strangevideos3048gravity, as an attractive force, is electromagnetic in mature - magnets. You need a rotating object with sufficient mass to generate an electromagnetic field. Grains of dust are attracted to each because of their electrical charges. Quantum gravity. The apple fell from the tree because of motion. The apple was no longer being accelerated by the tree and 'fell' to the ground. The gound accelerates the tree and the tree accelerated the apple. Since the tree is no longer accelerating the apple, it loses momentum until the ground catches up with it. You are in curved space. Not flat Earth space.

[@alexandrekassiantchouk1632]

This year result for gravity g ≈ -c²×D', where D is time dilation. That gives exact gravity for the Sun, the Earth, solves Vera Rubin's problem for galactic gravity, and the last but not least explains mechanism of 1000×g acceleration observed for UFOs.

[@strangevideos3048]

@@Jackie-wn5hx Atomic mass. Gravity is one of the weakest forces. Nuclear is the strongest.The more atoms a body has, the greater the force acting on it, very very simple.The only thing that is true, and some scientists already doubt it, is that there is no curvature in space-time. If the body moves at a high speed, that speed of movement affects the spin of the movement of the particles in your body, that is, molecules and atoms. And that in some way effects on aging.There are several of documentary about this theory ! Greeting from Balkan

[@SloppyGoat]

I believe John Wheeler was wrong. I think space tells matter how to move and to curve. Look out into the universe. It is undeniable that the universe is really good at making spheres. And it started doing that, way before there was anything large enough to have gravity. This whole idea that mass creates gravity, or even the curvature in space, is just wrong. It's exactly the opposite. Space itself is the most powerful force. And they're missing that. Look what it's doing right now. It is undebatable that it is carrying everything in it somewhere else, while expanding exponentially.

[@Apollyon-sz9sn]

Explain a black hole and time dilation if mass has nothing to do with it.

[@SloppyGoat]

@@Apollyon-sz9sn Think of this planet as a black hole, that doesn't suck quite as much. That's how it actually works. That's why there is mass here. It has no choice, but to be here, when it falls into the spherical well. Gravity is not a force. That is very well known, nowadays. It is the shape of space. But, what shapes spaces extremely controversial. Especially, if you actually admit that it's not a force. 🙄 And Einstein himself said it was not a force. He almost understood. Space, itself, is actually the most powerful force. And we still don't even consider it a force, for some reason? Why? Because we can't see or detect it.

[@babygirl8181980411]

Tell this to someone who survived a failed parachute.

[@colleendougherty4475]

nonsence einstein is so wrong for example if space really did push it would be the same as if we were all of a sudden placed under water you would feel the crushing push of the water . but gravity from mass the gravitons wave passes through your body it would pull you from inside out to the mass or the ground . that is what we are we are experencing not being pushed we can feel the difference sorry einstein . besides if space pushed the tides wouldnt work it wiould be a even push from all arount there would be no buldge , but gravity from mass the sun and the moon pulling on the ocean causes that budge so i hate to say it einstein but you wrong . gravity is fron mass and it pulls sorry . Reply