Martin Heidegger, Being and Time | Interpretation of Dasein & Temporality | Philosophy Core Concepts

Get Heidegger's Being and Time - amzn.to/2IvzAnX
Support my work here - / sadler
Philosophy tutorials - reasonio.wordpress.com/tutori...
Take classes with me - reasonio.teachable.com/
This is a video in my new Core Concepts series -- designed to provide students and lifelong learners a brief discussion focused on one main concept from a classic philosophical text and thinker.
This Core Concept video focuses on the introduction to Martin Heidegger's early work Being and Time, specifically on his discussion of how Dasein engages in interpretations not only of the being of other things but also of itself. This is involved in all understanding on its part, and interpretation can take place through the sciences and disciplines, through "average everydayness", and in another way through the type of inquiry Heidegger engages in. The key to this turns out to be attention to temporality (Zeitlichkeit).
If you'd like to support my work producing videos like this, become a Patreon supporter! Here's the link to find out more - including the rewards I offer backers: / sadler
You can also make a direct contribution to help fund my ongoing educational projects, by clicking here: www.paypal.me/ReasonIO
If you're interested in philosophy tutorial sessions with me - especially on Heidegger's thought and works - click here: reasonio.wordpress.com/tutori...
You can find the copy of the text I am using for this sequence on Heidegger's Being and Time here - amzn.to/2IvzAnX
My videos are used by students, lifelong learners, other professors, and professionals to learn more about topics, texts, and thinkers in philosophy, religious studies, literature, social-political theory, critical thinking, and communications. These include college and university classes, British A-levels preparation, and Indian civil service (IAS) examination preparation
#Heidegger #existentialism #metaphysics

[@wcropp1]

I'm loving this Heidegger series. Looking forward to the next one. I just read Plato's Parmenides for the first time the other night...what a trip! I didn't know Plato could be so tough, but I persevered nonetheless. I feel like this gave some insight into the difficulty of what Heidegger was trying to communicate. I really enjoy hearing his take on the ancients and their differing conceptions of being. Thanks Dr. Sadler!

[@GregoryBSadler]

You're very welcome!

[@daseinbellen]

enjoyed very much, thank you dr. sadler.

[@GregoryBSadler]

Thanks!

[@vanderlarss]

enjoying this. thank you.

[@GregoryBSadler]

you're welcome - glad to read it

[@gratuitousfootnote1183]

Dr Sadler - are you aware there are some outtakes in this? Seems like something you would usually edit out

[@SolSilence]

I think it made the video better, nice to see how he comes at his videos and how quickly he can get back on track.

[@vanderlarss]

it shows us the complexity of some concepts...and it also exemplifies how we can approach an idea from different vantage points.

[@GregoryBSadler]

Yep - when you're doing a lot of work under deadlines, that sort of thing that I do edit out most times will creep in

[@gratuitousfootnote1183]

Keep up the momentum, we appreciate all the work you do.

[@GregoryBSadler]

Well, I certainly aim to - but you never know what might come long.

[@massacreee3028]

Nice Plutarch plug professor 11:35

[@estebandelacruzg1281]

I liked the way you started the video. I know that is confusing sometimes. I wanted to ask you why are you reading from that particular edition of B&T? Also, is desire a mode of being-in-the-world? From what section of B&T are you reading?

[@3x4architecture77]

He works off of the Stanbaugh translation. (the one from the 90's)

[@3x4architecture77]

He's in the introduction.

[@Alexnovaify]

Put all those interpretations aside for the "time being"...I hope I'm not that one who chuckled at the peculiarity of that phrase in light of a YT video on B&T

[@TheMrthatdude17]

Is it me or is half of classical philosophy 'we don't want to be wrong; so we have to do philosophy this way'?

[@vienna11215]

Perhaps. On the surface, it might seem to be. But consider this: if everyone involved in philosophy strives to "not be wrong", the chance that the ultimate truth will manifest itself will be higher. It's a dialectic approach. True, we will never live to see the ultimate result, but by striving to not be wrong we will be a tiny, minute part of the ultimate end goal. Even if that end goal will only be achieved in a few million years for now, or never.

[@GregoryBSadler]

I've never had that impression about classical philosophy. That's sometimes the case in contemporary stuff though