looking forward in your lectures to Lacan's Psychoanalysis. Watching from the Philippines 🎉
@justanotherdump-ft5rf11 ай бұрын
By any chance are you a psych student? ik asking this seems weird
@unusualpond9 ай бұрын
I work in drug and alcohol rehabilitation. Can attest to the perverse pleasure (some) clients take in repeated relapse. Like you say, it feeds into their introjected guilt.
@addammadd11 ай бұрын
9:55 figure of the pervert 10:14 fetishistic disavowal and trauma 10:50 Freudian version (of course) 11:20 2 ways to deal with trauma
@joachim658511 ай бұрын
Hello from Berlin - and thanks for your thoughts.
@kkanden11 ай бұрын
Great and intriguing lecture as always! Are you planning on making another series focused on Hegel? I really loved the last series on Hegel and really learned and finally understood a bit of Hegel. I would love to hear you talk about Hegel's view on law and the state and how it relates to Marx' early work. Cheers and keep up the amazing work!
@shipaoroa40110 ай бұрын
2:30 intro - pervert v. Neurotic (of conceptual usage) - their relation to the fetish disavowal 4:00 brief lives of the idiots - 7:18 its obsessive neurotic turning into pervert enjoyments - 8:00 paranoia twd content
@pr144159911 ай бұрын
Brilliant, thank you!
@taboulefattouch47445 ай бұрын
Thanks for the elaborate explanation !
@midtalkpodcast6 ай бұрын
40:06 Omg the doormetory anecdote made me laughing 😮 indeed it is crazy anxious and weird 😱
@FlygandeSjuk11 ай бұрын
Signing in from Sweden.
@osoisko193311 ай бұрын
I'm watching from Hell.
@joostietoost422011 ай бұрын
This is nice to know, now I'll derive surplus enjoyment from this knowledge once I go to heaven
@mistressmandyz11 ай бұрын
Same (Texas) 🙋🏼♀️
@X_TheHuntsman_X10 ай бұрын
@@mistressmandyz Alabama myself...
@lilomark254311 ай бұрын
watching from Mars
@bobvp943411 ай бұрын
thank you for your work! just curious: was framing the no smoking sign in the back intentional?
@salehali33725 ай бұрын
Ur so good julian..
@vanjagruntar11 ай бұрын
does anyone know the precise citation and it's place: Hegel - as soon as you speak, you are doomed
@akbar-nr4kc11 ай бұрын
hello julain i have question from you is wishful thinking a form perversion? or neurotic
@jabrane156411 ай бұрын
most relgious people do not engage theologically with their faith. And if they did they will leave it. The sad reality, most relgious people will state that they beleive in God because of evidence and logical arguments.
@taciprince740010 ай бұрын
39:52 was definitely too high to hear this at once
@theonetruetim11 ай бұрын
wow
@theonetruetim11 ай бұрын
Seriously; this IS brilliant! Pervert v neurotic.... very useful framing device. very useful, indeed. thank u. thank u. thank u. This gets straight at it, whatever it may be. per the ideal, the pragmatic, the norm, or the not.
@chaosmos249 ай бұрын
Lacan is pure sophistry.
@Jack-in-the-country8 ай бұрын
I have many, many criticisms of Lacan that I'd be happy to go into, but for now, I'd like you to tell my why Lacan is a sophist.
@ahmedmusa51039 ай бұрын
This sounds similar to avoidant and anxious attachments 🤔
@chaosmos249 ай бұрын
No church has Hegel's understanding of the crucifixion.
@bolm16 ай бұрын
29:12
@chaosmos249 ай бұрын
Telling that these discussions always invoke Catholicism and Protestantism, but not Orthodox Christianity.
@thisiswheezie9 ай бұрын
In this sense, the term Catholic includes Catholic-like systems, meaning it also refers to other Apostolic forms of Christianity, like Eastern Orthodoxy, Oriental Orthodoxy and Church of the East.
@chaosmos249 ай бұрын
@@thisiswheezie There are relevant theological differences between them though. Zizek's framing of sin is foreign to Orthodoxy.
@sanammalik711611 ай бұрын
Anyone from India ??
@Frownbrows8 ай бұрын
Hello there
@chaosmos249 ай бұрын
Taking Freud seriously today? Might as well use astrology as the basis for your psychological project.
@chaosmos249 ай бұрын
21:32 The inversion is heretical. Hegel was a hermeticist, not a philosopher. The that his subversion of religious text is simehiw authiritative rather than one idiosyncratic interpretation is bizarre. Hegel/Marx/Lacan is an unholy trinity of bullshit. Incredible that anyone takes a project built on them seriously.
@ViniViecelli18 ай бұрын
It seems like the only Karl you want is of the Popper kind 😅