Hasselblad 907X Review | It's Not for Me

[@UnverifiedUser10]

I'm watching it like I can afford it.

[@blindsleep]

Aren’t we all?

[@jonjonckheer5063]

What blindsleep said 👍🏼

[@hiltsyartnstuff1142]

Even if I could afford it, I still wouldn’t buy it.

[@UnverifiedUser10]

@@hiltsyartnstuff1142 Exactly

[@MrShuaiGuy]

😂

[@PedroLauridsenRibeiro]

The older 500C, 500C/M and 503CX models in Hasselblad's V system have a time exposure lock-up function (small lever around the shutter release button) that was removed in the 501CM and 503CW. With that, you can shoot with the CFV II 50C in Live View using the electronic shutter without holding the shutter release button with your finger or a release cable - just set the shutter speed on the lens to B, set the time exposure lock lever to T and press the shutter button - both the lens' leaf shutter and the secondary shutter on the back of the body will remain open until you disengage the lever back to the O position, leaving the optical path open for the sensor to do its thing. This is nice even if you just want to be painstakingly accurate with your focus by appealing to the focus peaking and zoom functions on the back, disengaging the time exposure lock and then shooting the usual way (although you'll probably want to use a tripod setup for all that as well). On the other hand, the 501CM and the 503CW have the gliding mirror that prevents the viewfinder vignetting with longer lenses (above 150mm, it seems) that plagued the older V-system models - the viewfinder vignetting becomes immaterial for the lenses that matter (up to 250mm) with the CFV II 50C back due to the sensor crop, though - especially if you use a focusing screen with the framelines for that sensor (more on that below). Although the 907X manual doesn't make it clear, the camera and the XCD lenses are in fact weather sealed (this was clarified by The Photoblographer's review of the 907X), although I guess not to the level of rugged pro-level DSLRs like Nikon's D850 or D5 - otherwise Hasselblad would probably be more vocal about it. I'd wager it's about as weather sealed as the X1D II. A feature of the CFV II 50C back that handicaps both the 907X and the V-system bodies somewhat is the sensor format. 6x6 negatives in medium format mean that you don't have to rotate the camera by 90 degrees to shoot in portrait mode (after all, it is the same as landscape mode if your negative is a square), which is a necessity if you use the waist level finder that comes with the camera. This also applies to Live View in the 907X if you use the back screen facing up. This is not a problem for the X1D II since it has an EVF and a grip. However, it can be mitigated to a great degree in the V system bodies if you use a prism viewfinder accessory such as the PM45 (45 degrees), the PM90 (90 degrees) or their respective analogues equipped with TTL metering (the PME51 and PME90), possibly combined with a grip if you shoot handheld. In my opinion, a TTL meter-equipped prism viewfinder is an indispensable add-on to a Hasselblad V-system camera. As for the 907X, you can add the optional grip but the lack of a TTL viewfinder (be it optical or electronic) is indeed a bummer - Hasselblad seemingly tried to emulate their old SWC camera when they added only the non-TTL optical viewfinder as an option. I hope they go further than that in the future. The CFV II 50C also has a cropped square mode that does away with the portrait mode issues but that wastes a good deal of the sensor and the lens. The ideal situation would be having a full-frame 6x6 sensor (56mm x 56mm) but there has never been a medium-format digital back with a sensor that big, not even the far more expensive, state-of-the-art backs from Phase One and H-system Hasselblad. One thing I miss from the original CFV 50C back is that they downgraded the accompanying focusing screen with the cropping frames for both the full sensor and the aforementioned square crop to a focusing screen mask. The latter has the advantage that you can use any focusing screen you want (specially since Hasselblad recommends using split-image focusing screens with the CFV II 50C back for better manual focus accuracy, which becomes more critical than when using film), but you no longer have the framelines for the squared crop mode. You probably can find the focusing screen with the crop framelines to buy separately, though (either new or used) - _Update_ : the Acute Matte D focusing screen with the split microprism at the center and the CFV (II) 50C framelines _is_ being sold by Hasselblad separately, you can find it new e.g. at B&H. It's a great focusing screen (in my opinion, even the best one for the V system) and it costs _less_ than used Acute Matte D's, I recommend it even if you're not interested in getting the digital back. I don't see much sense in buying the 907X over the slightly less expensive X1D II if you are into Hasselblad (especially if you are considering using the superb XCD lenses) but don't already have a V-system film camera, and Hasselblad is clearly aiming at V-system owners with the 907X since the idea is to keep as much of the V-system experience and haptics as possible, for better or worse. Sure, the small form factor for medium format is cool, but ergonomics suffers. And yes, the Fujifilm GFX 50 has the same sensor, none of the cons of the 907X, and shoots faster for a bit more than half the price, but how do the software / color processing and glass of both systems compare? It's an honest question - after all, when all is said and done all that matters are the pictures. For V-system owners who want to have a digital option to it (and may even consider adding XCD glass to the legendary Zeiss lens portfolio of the V system), I think that the lackluster autofocus, fps and video capabilities of the CFD II 50C back are rather minor setbacks (hehe) since they will be shooting manual most of the time anyway, that's what the experience is all about (even if at the price of a probably less-than-ideal focus accuracy for 50MP digital standards). Having a metering prism viewfinder in your V-system camera would be immensely helpful when using the CFV II 50C back with it, though.

[@inter-linked]

The lock-up feature was simply moved to the right of body. The 907 ‘camera’ is a distraction. The real product is the back.

[@PedroLauridsenRibeiro]

@@inter-linked you are correct regarding the mirror lock-up button - it stays just below the film advance crank on all V system models (both old and new). I actually meant the _time exposure lock_ lever around the shutter release button, the mirror lock-up doesn't really have anything to do with what I meant to say, sorry for that - I've just edited the first paragraph of my comment above to make it clearer. That being said, I also meant that the 501CM and the 503CW really don't have the time exposure lock lever like the older V system models, and this piece of information is accurate (I don't have either model, but I've checked it in their manuals).

[@SangSamuel9999]

Your comment was very helpful to me. Thank you very much.

[@sirgengar1189]

Great post. I'm a proud owner of the 203FE and unfortunately I think my time with film is all but done. It's getting too expensive to have film developed and scanned (hobby Vs work) I've got a fair few unprocessed rolls loitering with intent and I'm at the point where I don't want to turn my back on the camera but don't want to keep putting into the money pit that is film photography. They have recently opened a Hassleblad store in Birmingham, the only one in the UK currently and I was able to try both the 907 and it's more standard looking sibling and I fell in love with the former (obviously being a V body owner I can't help but admire their workmanship and how fantastic it looks and feels). The 203FE has a built in meter and of course the 110 f2 lens, which feels like it would be a great combination with this digital back. I do also own the XPan II so initially when I walked into the shop I was expecting to pick up the XD1 II and come away happy with that being my new camera as I could always buy Thier (albeit expensive) adapters for the V / Xpan System. I didn't even know they had made (to my shame) the 907 and I left with a lot more to think about hah. Needless to say I'm still a little torn but my heart says go for the 907X 😅

[@dezfoto7534]

Really great reply with a lot of info!

[@jean-claudemuller3199]

Hi Thomas The 907x is indeed sealed ! Each XCD lens has a rubber gasket on the bayonet The back face of the 907x module is completely lined with rubber to seal it against the CFV II back The internal face of the CFV II side door (battery and cards) is internally rubber lined to seal it The connectors under the rear screen are covered with a rubber plug. The CFVII 50c is the cheapest MF back on the market, Fuji has no MF back. Operating the 500C wit CFVII in live view is not the normal way to use it. The normal way is to operate it like a film SLR, the exposure is measured by the prism lightmeter or external lightmeter the same way as with film

[@wadeduvall7026]

It's sealed between the body and back and at the lens mount but several reviewers have mentioned the sealing on the battery/SD door is very minimal which I think is what he's worried about as well.

[@SnapCracklePop1010]

It's a bit misleading to say the "CFVII 50c is the cheapest MF back on the market" because it is not for sale as a standalone product. You currently can't buy the back without the 907x body.

[@jean-claudemuller3199]

@@SnapCracklePop1010 Hasselblad says that in this package the cost of the 907x compared to CFVII is that random that they don't sell the CFVII alone right now. It's also a marketing strategy to sell more XCD lenses, and perhaps X1D bodies that are way more ergonomic in general use with XCD lenses

[@jean-claudemuller3199]

@@wadeduvall7026 If you show in details how it's made you will notice that the door itself isn't sealed but the SD card slots and battery have a compressed rubber bloc on top that prevents water to touch them even if water can go behind the door.

[@jean-claudemuller3199]

I even just found a 5th rubber seal. The CFVII can be powered by DC 12V to 24V, the socket is underneath and closed by a rubber plug.

[@angloart8410]

This review actually persuades me that this would be the camera for me (if I could afford it). I rarely work outside and produce studio based images in the conceptual/abstract photography realm - need none of the bells and whistles that most cameras have, just the highest quality image files that I can print very large (2m or more in some cases). And I've never looked at a histogram in my life.

[@kurocamera]

You can shoot with the 500cm without pressing the shutter the whole time. Option 1) Set the lens to Bulb to use live view Option 2) Select the 500cm mode on the settings menu to use 500cm as you regularly would (without live view)

[@BenjaminKanarek]

Way too convoluted!

[@NicholasAndre1]

This camera is primarily a digital back for those that want the ergonomic experience of a film camera with a 203FE and the 110mm F2 lens but also want a digital capture mode. It’s workflow is to use it identically to a film camera (set iso and then use the camera shutter, viewfinder, and meter). The shimming of a mini mirrorless digital “camera” onto the front of it seems like a bit of a gimmick or a “why not” afterthought bridge between their V system offering and the X system lenses. I believe the intent would be that people primarily purchase this for use on a 203FE and then consider the ability to work with X lenses a bonus. The 500cm has a shutter lock as well obviating the need for an external cable release as well. One of the other drawbacks is the lack of a shutter in camera, so even though the adapter is available you cannot effectively use the mirrorless camera with a V system lens.

[@atapourhassan7442]

Disagree, I have been shooting Hasselblad for a long time. I will not sacrifice the quality over comfort, specially when quality is the most important when you finally find a lovely composition. Zeiss lenses on the Hassy 's are the best thus far. As far as your issue with keeping the shutter open during live view you can use a locking cable release while lens is set on B. Some Hasselblad bodies like SWC have shutter locking mechanism, I use them all the time. For metering you can get a Hasselblad view finder which has light meter. Some 500 Hasselblad series like FE has metering built in and you may utilize Zone system in your light measuring. For most of your shots you use long exposures anyway- and for that having a handheld light meter is the best. Your honesty, however, is admirable.

[@SummersSnaps]

Bought a 645D, cheapest entry into digital MF imo and its stunning, even still in 2020.

[@domsphotography]

I thought when used with a 500 series camera you were supposed to focus through the bodies view finder no the lcd thus there was no need to keep the the shutter open.

[@jamesbrickert1301]

Being that I inherited a Hasselblad 500 C, 500C/M and a SWC, I am really interested in a digital back. Since Hasselblad won’t sell the CFV 50c II individually, I surmise that I will have to purchase the 907x. Enjoy your videos. Thanks.

[@arrykitting7682]

Fujirumour says a smaller 100 MP medium camera is coming in Q2 2021. Stick around for a while Tom with your full frame. You can see later whether you should go to 50 MP or the new 100 MP medium format 🙂. Your Canon lenses can also be used in GFX; certainly with some limitation.

[@sweetdavey]

Why would you buy a 100 mp camera, honestly? Just out of curiosity. I don't get it :)

[@declannorton2023]

@@sweetdavey image quality/ size as you can crop loads and retain the detail. but you also get an extra stop or two of dynamic range with medium format compared to full frame

[@sweetdavey]

@@declannorton2023 yeah I get the draw of medium format due to the great DR and clean files, but 100 mp? Do you really crop that heavily, and if so how often? Also wouldn't you need to absolutely nail the sharpness of every shot to be able to take advantage of that? Higher mp cameras also tend to be more demanding in that sense, requiring perfect handling to get that sharp results (so I've heard). It just seems so excessive, and a hassle to handle such big files.

[@declannorton2023]

@@sweetdavey its not just to crop but you can, its mainly just for the highest image quality possible. MF is usually used in product photography and other studio work to get the up most quality. You'd still need to hit focus to achieve this and the file sizes aren't big if you have lots of storage.

[@stevemckenzie4731]

Nice to have a MF camera with a 100mpx sensor but as a landscape photographer, you may quickly find you'll need to focus stack just about everything if you shoot wide ...

[@vijaychitte6921]

Dear i would super suggest go for GFX 50S if you really want to get switch over on medium format digital camera for landscape ...

[@bassem500]

Hi Thomas, did you consider the Leica SL2? And if you did what are your thoughts on it?

[@jeffreyhorton]

Have you tried Zeiss lenses on your Canon? I found that I much preferred Zeiss over Canon lenses, which eventually led to me leaving the Canon ecosystem.

[@ursbeerli9900]

Hello Tom, in order to open the shutter door for the live view with a V system, it should be possible to use the pre release button instead mounting a cable, or not? It remains open. Best Regards Urs

[@knudlindholmlau7570]

Yes, set it to T and then release, probem solved. Desribed in the manual.

[@brucecrossan2284]

That huge sensor looks very exposed. . . why didn't they incorporate a dark slide that you remove after fitting the camera to the body? Would protect the sensor and keep out most of the dust.

[@dennislee8253]

Thank you for an honest and straightforward review here. I fear I've been tempted by the glamour of this Hassy for doing my own industrial landscape work, but I'm going to rethink that a bit now. Actually, you may have put the nail in the coffin with the comment on weather sealing. It's not rain that's my primary culprit, (although I shoot for hours in the rain occasionally) but dust. That could be my nemesis with this camera. Thanks again. Very very much appreciated. Geez it is beautiful though. LOL

[@KoenigF50]

So what's wrong with a Pentax 645Z as a rugged fully sealed medium format kit ?

[@KevinAli66]

Are you going to try out the nikon Z7 ii ?

[@jaredwillson3769]

Why would he? He’d have to give up all his Canon glass. Why would anyone do that unless they were making a switch to another format?

[@silvere36]

@@jaredwillson3769 iso 64.

[@JamesLanePhoto]

I’ve used a GFX 50R for 20 months now. I love it so much. The colour, the image quality, the dynamic range and the lenses all amazing. Only thing that bothers me is the lack of a longer telephoto zoom - but of course this would be GIANT on a GFX. If you ever want to borrow my 50R or any of the lenses I have, please feel free. I’m in Yorkshire and would be happy to send them your way.

[@BenjaminKanarek]

That is why I use a couple of GFX50S's. One for the vertical tilt rear screen capability, Ergonomically perfect for my 250mm f/4.0 lens and the tilting viewfinder adapter.

[@tomscameras]

I think they just gave the wrong camera to you. For you as a landscape photographer, the better Hasselblad option would be the X1D series! The whole point of the 907x is that it is modular, yes it also is a design piece, and above all you can use it very well together with the 500 series cameras. If I read correctly, there also is an option that the you set everything from the back, without using the SLR viewfinder and external light meter. And isn't there a round knob around the shutter button so that you can lock it open on B ?? Then you don't need to use a cable release all the time. But maybe not all 500 series bodies have that. I remember my old one had it.

[@kkqqqqpppp]

This camera has an eye-level viewfinder. Just you have to buy it separately. And about the digital back on 501cm, you can connect them by a flash sync cable.

[@tombuck]

Definitely an “absolutely stunning” camera, just a bummer about the quirks. Thanks for the genuine insight/review!

[@dominey]

I’m keeping the faith that Canon will release a 5DSR equivalent of the R5. Cripple the video specs for all I care! Bring on the megapixels! Come on Canon...we need it.

[@danielb8877]

Thomas, any plans to test out a PhaseOne?

[@QuietLightPhoto]

You know you want one Tom. I am seriously considering, just need to sell a kidney.

[@tamasnemeth2161]

I think he wants a Phase One XT. At least he should try one. I could even help hooking up him with a loaner myself. Maybe a nice, intact kidney would make the business possible. ;)

[@antonoat]

But you're using a GFX why would you want the Hasselblad?

[@AlessioMichelini]

after all, who needs two kidneys nowadays?

[@QuietLightPhoto]

@@antonoat I do but not the GFX100

[@antonoat]

@@QuietLightPhoto Oh yeah a slight typo from me! I don't think Thomas could cope with 100mp, lol. From my experience the R and the S deliver outstanding image quality especially when compared with 35mm sized digital sensors. I don't think many people need more image quality than either the GFX50r/s.

[@ronsteelman6025]

I agree with a previous comment...get the Canon EOS R5...although I have to say, you're 5D Mark IV has served you well...I prefer your videos when you are using it because I believe a large portion of your audience can associate with it including myself.

[@svvancouver3307]

I came here to decide between the 907x 50c or the x1d ii. I know I would use the x1d ii with more ease but tried to convince myself the 907x is better in some way...but of course I am really torn because of the looks. Thank you for your honest review. You really hit the nail on the head on several fronts why this is not the greatest in the field. Also when you said it doesn’t feel complete I knew I shouldn’t be paying more for the grip and EVF, so I think I will go for the x1d ii.

[@benjhaisch]

I believe you can use the electronic shutter on the digital back when using the film bodies, right?

[@raycavicchiophotography4832]

It's a shame you didn't have a good amount of time to test out the camera. I think if you did, your opinion would have been much different. This camera isn't for everyone. It's not the type of camera we've become so used to, where you take a couple lightening fast photos, and then rush off to the next scene. It's a camera that allows you just a little bit more time to put a little bit more thought into the photo you're about to take. It's actually very refreshing to be able to slow it down a little like you do while using a film camera....but with some fairly basic, but important and usable tech, included. There is some weather sealing. The camera portion itself, has a large rubber gasket that seats inside the grooves of the digital back, that also helps protect the sensor from dirt and dust. There's a large rubber pad under the battery compartment lid that compresses when you slide the lid shut. I recently took a trip to Acadia National Park in Maine. I used this camera on a drizzly, foggy morning with no problems. I didn't allow it to get soaked because that would have been careless. Any camera that gets soaked is at risk for malfunction. The XCD lens line is weather sealed also. I have the XCD 45mm 3.5 which is weather sealed. You're complaining about ergonomics and how it feels in hand, but your 501cm is larger, and clunkier, AND you have to use the viewfinder since there's no flip screen. This confuses me because this camera is about 1/3 the size of your 501. This is just the digital version of your 501, in a much smaller, lighter weight package. One of Hasselblad's mistakes was they should have sent the optional viewfinder and grip that's available for this camera. I noticed with other photographers, they sent this camera out to test, Hasselblad didn't send out the viewfinder mask either, to be used with the film body. The mask goes inside your 501cm viewfinder to help you stay in frame with the digital sensor. The digi-back has that flip touch screen that simulates the waist level view finder on your 501cm. The simplicity and ease of use with the menu is perfection. If you used the mirror lock up and put the lens in bulb mode, you would have been able to use live-view with your 501cm. Also, turning on the cameras electronic shutter would have helped with that issue. I've used the back on my 500c and my 203FE with no problems. The software basically switches everything over for you when you choose which body you're using in the menu.There is a histogram overlay available while you're reviewing your shots. I'm happy you brought up the image quality, it is pretty awesome. Maybe I missed it .... one very important feature you didn't mention is the 16 bit color depth. SOOC they are close to perfect and need little adjustment. Highlight and shadow recovery is really impressive. The Fuji is close, with 14 bit. Since you brought up the Fuji, you can't slap a GFX on to the back of your 501cm. These are two different cameras with two difference purposes.

[@road_side_tog7906]

Nice to see you totally missed the point of his review and his opinion. Please tell us more how wrong people are?

[@raycavicchiophotography4832]

@@road_side_tog7906 ​I didn't say he was wrong. I clearly stated this camera isn't for everyone, and that he probably didn't have enough time to thoroughly test out the camera. It's part of my opening in my comment. What part of this didn't you understand? I added to this "review" because a lot of important info about the cameras features was left out, along with some incorrect information. People should be informed fully and accurately of it's features if they are considering buying one. This "review" was way off.

[@amplimaxi]

I've got the 907x with the grip and don't regret it - the grip extends the usage a lot and the ergonomics are better than a classic camera design. I really don't miss the view finder and I doubt it would help a lot when focus is critical due to the huge resolution. But that's just me and my style, I like the slow motion style when shooting landscape and the workflow and experience is comparable with shooting my old 503CW. I agree with you though when using the digital back on the 503CW: there you have many limitations. I shot with the 907x several times during wet weather (foggy, snowy) and so far no problem. I wouldn't take it out during a heavy rain though, but I wouldn't photograph outside anyway with such weather conditions. I like the modularity of the system and that was one of the reasons for me to get it, plus a similar System V shooting experience and image quality. Color rendition, image quality and dynamic range are a dream.

[@russjt]

Upvoted & watched just because this was a reasonable review, without a clickbaity title. I wasn't actually interested in knowing much about this camera, but it's a breath of fresh air to not see straight up clickbait.

[@RobLawson1982]

Great review. I just bought two based on your recommendation 👍🏻 thanks.

[@stefannikoloff1860]

Ive been shooting the GFX 50r for over 18months now, never looked back. The added bonus of getting capture one was the icing on the cake or was it the combined $4000 cash back ive got from my body and lenses.

[@ALWH1314]

I retired and ordered one, old school style, slow pace, form over function; it is a great joy taking it to Santa Monica beach and capture sunset in that beautiful Hasselblad color. It is also great for street shooting, you be surprised how many people are willing to let me take a picture of them with a Hasselblad 907x 50c but no to Sony A7r4. My favorite lenses are the 21mm and 45mm p, both are small and light enough for handheld.

[@DavidHarrisGRI]

Interesting. The look of a classic style of camera having a positive affect on the mindset of your prospective subjects. People can definitely be shy of a dslr or modern point and shoot aimed at them, I have experienced that many times.

[@jaredwillson3769]

For a landscape photographer, either the GFX 50R or the Hasselblad X1D II would be a better choice simply because of the weather sealing. Both are easy to handhold. Both have the same sensor. Both have a good range of excellent native lenses and the ability to adapt additional lenses. The 907X, while beautiful and cool, is really intended for situations where you can control the environment better such as studio photography and event photography. Which to buy if you are a landscape photographer thinking of moving to medium format? X1D II or GFX 50R? Well, the Fuji is much less expensive as a system. Maybe a third or even a half off once you get camera, lenses, and accessories. Image quality is superb out of either. I prefer the colors out of the Hasselblad (though raw files in either are extremely adaptable, so you won’t have trouble getting the look you want with either, especially if you profile your camera and build a few presets). I also prefer the minimalist controls on the Hasselblad, but that is very personal. There is no getting around the price advantage of the Fuji. Tom, sounds like that may be the camera for you. By the way, Fuji has said something new is coming next year in their medium format lineup, but they have given any hints what it is. Assuming that it’s a 50R with a 100 megapixel chip is, well, a bit of a leap. It could be anything. Could be a monochrome GFX-100. Could be a 50S with IBIS (a great feature, but not really helpful for landscape).

[@robertcristi2008]

Looks like I will keep my Olympus EM-5 II as it is weather sealed. These cameras are way way out of my budget however I appreciate the work you put into bringing this info to us. Not everyone might afford them however it is good to know what is out there if the time hopefully comes to upgrade to something in that range.

[@mattm7831]

Still shooting with my OMD EM1 Mi. Same situation as you, could not justify spending that sort of money. If I upgraded I would probably jump to Sony's A7 line. Will miss the image stabilization on the Olympus though, it is pretty incredible.

[@mattm7831]

@@Jon-es-i6o I've heard incredible things about the EM5. My only gripe to the EM and OMD lines are that the sensors are not great for low light and the menu system drives me nuts. That being said Ill definitely look further into the EM5 for my next purchase. Thanks for the tip!

[@p.io7]

@@mattm7831 it is not worth it upgrading from MFT to full frame imo, you'll just get a bigger camera with a slightly better image quality. Better keep the system portable for day to day shooting. And get a medium format camera when the time is right for crating high quality art work.

[@MeOrNotMeWhoKnows]

@@p.io7 The image quality is noticeably better though, not slightly, especially when comparing the older 16mp mft sensor (from the OP's EM5-2) to the modern high-res FF. Hell, even the old a7rII from 2015 with its 42mp sensor takes images with a lot more details, dynamic range, and less noise than any MFT camera out there. But, of course, there are pros to the MFT system as well. Not much for the landscape photography, though, I'd never go with MFT if landscapes were my main focus, especially how the older Fuji's XT bodies are quite affordable now, and one can even get an older DSLR full-frame for ~ $1k (D750 is exactly $1k new, even 5DS sells for $1200 now on ebay). As a jack of all trades and mostly shooting video - yeah, MFT is still reasonable (Panasonic bodies though, not Olympus). And 2.8 zooms are relatively affordable and decent (pana 12-35/35-100, oly 12-40). Then again, MFT is a dead-end system, and most likely will be gone in a few years, so, while perfectly viable right now, investing a lot in lenses and accessories is probably not a good idea.

[@mattm7831]

@@Jon-es-i6o very true!

[@cf3619]

Which digital camera as the best dynamic range? That’s the one I want 👍🏻

[@edgarin]

I have both cameras. The Canon 5D MK III and the Hasselblad H5D wich is also a modular professional system and I tell you there´s no comparison. MEdium format is much more a photography camera than any other in the market and Hasselblad have definetly the best ones. I really love the 907X but i think my H5D is the same in quality. Nice review!

[@Lydus3032]

Did you get a chance to use Hasselblad Phocus software with it? I was wondering if it makes image look even better then Lightroom - thanks for your perspective - i love your videos!

[@sophietucker1255]

I use a rain sleeve even with my weather sealed cameras if the rain is coming down. Easy to use and less cleaning of a wet or dirty camera after a long day in the weather. I use them at the beach or really sandy locations too. The weather sealing isn't up to blowing sand and salt spray on most cameras. I do agree about the histogram. I have no idea how I ever made any images without staring at a histogram before pressing the shutter release.

[@andrefelixstudio2833]

I have the impression that a Hasselblad has an ability to B set to B to keep the lens open and the mirror up you wouldn’t have to have your finger pushed on the button all the time, I think mine do that, and yes I shoot mostly in the studio with catalog work. These days I shoot mostly with my canon no need for a medium format those days for me a long gone! Nice video!

[@jefft3814]

You may not like doing camera reviews, but let me tell you that you have made at least one excellent. Because I listened to at least fifteen reviews of this camera on KZbin (907X) before watching yours and yet, you are the first to have taught me that: 1) this camera is not weather sealed; 2) there is no histogram in the live view; 3) it shares the same sensor as the Fujifilm GFX that sells a lot cheaper! Thank you for this very valuable information!

[@Astrolavista]

I really hope digital medium format becomes more affordable one day. Around 2k for a camera body then I'm in!

[@issue_1337]

Have you thought about the GFX50S?

[@JohnDrummondPhoto]

So if you love the medium format image quality and are open to upgrading from your 5D Mark IV, is an R5 or the rumored high-MP R5S in your future? I'm looking at both, myself (although the latter camera isn't in existence yet).

[@hauxon]

The juiciness of the MF files in post is a combination of pixel count, per pixel sharpness, fatter more malleable pixels and the general extreme high quality of MF glass. Canon is (finally) doing something great these days but Thomas would end up selling all his SLR glass for RF. The cost of the best RF lenses are on par with the Fuji GF lenses ..so why not take a full step into the image quality high end.

[@haraldselke]

Well, the advantage of switching to the EOS R system for someone coming from EOS SLRs is exactly that you don‘t have to sell all your glass. You would probably replace some of your lenses but you could also do that later rather than sooner as all the EF lenses work perfectly on the R cameras. And since Thomas probably has pretty good lenses, they should be good enough for the higher resolution of the R5 at least or maybe even higher resolutions than that. I am currently mainly using two of my Zeiss Milvus lenses on an R5 and they perform brilliantly. And focussing manually is so much more fun on the R5 than it was on any AF (D)SLR I have ever used. But of course you are right about the other advantages of medium format (though as a hiking landscape photographer I also see some disadvantage with respect to size and weight in particular).

[@hauxon]

@@haraldselke Yes ..and no. Using an adapter may work but it's not ideal especially when hiking, just unnecessary hassle. And speaking of hiking I find no problem hiking with my GFX gear. The 50S+GF23 are about the same size and weight as the 5D2+21ZE I used to have (and love). The camera hangs off a Peak design Clip on my backpack sholder strap. Fuji has made an effort of doing small (and slow) glass for this purpose. For me the GFX system is the ultimate system when it comes to hiking for landscape photography and I hike a lot.

[@haraldselke]

@@hauxon You are certainly right with respect to the Fuji system. For a medium format system it really is very small and lightweight. Whoever wants to see if that is a feasible alternative, should check with their priorities and way of taking photographs. Besides the lenses mentioned in my earlier post, my most used lens which I almost always carry with me is a 70-200mm f/4. Maybe a light-weight equivalent is available for medium format, I haven‘t checked. Also, I use a filter system which would probably also have to be bulkier for a medium format system. My main point, however, was that switching from EF to RF does not mean that you have to buy a whole lot of lenses. So far, my adapter has been sitting on the camera all the time - so no hassle at all. If I were to switch frequently between EF and RF lenses, I would probably buy a second adapter and would leave the adapters on the EF lenses. And since I rarely go hiking with more than three lenses, two adapters would be the maximum I‘d need. But then again: That‘s me. Your mileage may vary.

[@reinhartreuschel5499]

About 50 years ago, I got aquainted & familiar with the Hasselblad 500C/M. Outdoors I appreciated more a TLR or the surprisingly handy Pentax 6x7. But indoors a Hasselblad, sturdy on a tripod, was the best choice because you needn't turn the body from horizontal to vertical format. If you needed more but with an equally fast camera, you'd chosen the Mamiya RB or RZ 67. To me the biggest con of the new Hasselblad is its turn away from the square format. So I have to turn the body from horizontal to vertical format what is at least awful with long and heavy lenses. The otherwise genious Hasselblad engineers forgot fitting a rotating frame if you didn't want to stick to the square. But that would be an easily possible optimisation of an otherwise wonderful camera. In its current shape it's nothing but a lifestyle symbol to showcase richness without optimising usability. @philosimot

[@eriksellstrom2679]

This was actually a super helpful review. I've been lusting after the Hasselblad 907x since it was announced, but honestly, I think I just wanted it for how cool it looks. You've convinced me it just wouldn't be practical.

[@johnwatson4695]

It does have weather sealing, not sure how good it is but it has thin rubber seals inside the battery/SD card door and between the camera body and the back. It is small, light and takes amazing photographs fitted with the XCD 45p. It just doesn't fit Thomas Heaton's particular needs but it might fit into yours :)

[@TypewriterChicago]

I think I'd find it incredibly practical, as I come from a film background. I'd use it solely as a digital back. I enjoy the workflow of my camera, and would treat the back like film, set the ISO and ignore it. I wouldn't even check shots, I just would love the ability to have files readily available for product shoots etc, and to not worry about the cost of film. But 6k?? Ridiculous. Maybe it'll come down in five years or so. I'll wait.

[@keithratcliffe5576]

Out of my league but I applaud your honesty in this review. Just got your calendar - thanks.

[@alberttherkelsen9099]

why wouldn't you use it on your vintage hassy?

[@jvusa]

Nice review Thomas, How is Hasselblad H6D 50C?

[@jean-claudemuller3199]

H6D 50c has the same sensor and same imaging system, but the back is much more expensive

[@jvusa]

@@jean-claudemuller3199 Thank you so much Jean,

[@jvusa]

@@jean-claudemuller3199 Jean, I have another question, did you see any 3d pop look on the image as people talk there is a 3d pop look compare to full frame dslr?

[@jean-claudemuller3199]

IMO the 3D look comes mainly from the optics. Having very sharp lenses at full aperture and over the entire frame. The best XCD lens for a 3D look is the 80mm

[@jvusa]

@@jean-claudemuller3199 Thank you so much Jean, Appreciate.

[@jpdj2715]

Hasselblad has a discrete analog-to-digital conversion (which you need to convert the analog measuring of the photosites in the sensor to digital values) and with that it can discern 16 bits - which I would find extremely important in shots with lots of very fine nuances. With Fujifilm limiting to 14 bits, we can assume that they source the same sensor but with bundled, integrated, AD conversion circuit and consequently the 16 bits option is lost. As each Hasselblad lens has its own shutter - a so called leaf shutter which is like the diaphragm that gives you the aperture, only it can completely open and close very fast - it has speedlight (flash) synchronization (X-sync) up to its shortest exposure time (aka fastest shutter speed (*) ). With a focal plane shutter that provides an exposed slit rolling along the sensor, the Fujifilm gets 1/125 sec X-sync that is old-fashioned slow, especially if you need to overpower the sun in outdoors shoots, even by a little bit only. The "old fashioned slow" is due to the larger sensor that requires longer travel of the "curtains". I think the 16 bits can benefit landscape photography, especially in very large prints that are very subtle in their graduation - and I advise to experiment with converting 14 bits shots to 32 bits in Photoshop to investigate here and compare with native 16 bit shots and 16 bits converted to 32. The X-sync will generally play with people, sports, moving objects, not landscapes. (*) shutter speed is a bit of an oxymoron as the mechanism always travels equally fast. The exposure time is caused by the time between opening and closing.

[@derekgillan7314]

outstanding knowledge

[@keith5824]

Fuji GFX camera can shoot 16bit. And as a landscape / wildlife photographer I never use flash so shutter speed wouldn’t be a problem to me. Seems like I have a decision. Thanks for making my mind!

[@jpdj2715]

@@keith5824 - B&H specs said 14 bits, but if Fujifilm says 16 we have to believe that. Your interpretation was exactly what I meant. Consider your use cases and from that what you need. So if you buy into that, good luck with it.

[@keith5824]

@@jpdj2715 yeah I think some old GFX models shoot in 14bit and all new models can shoot 16bit. I do agree that different cameras fit different needs. There is no ‘better’ or ‘worse’ just whichever fit us the most. And for me the answer seems to be the Fuji cameras. However one thing that makes me can’t make my mind is actually Hasselblad’s fantastic color science. Although I’m not sure if I would like to pay twice the money just for that 🤔 also Hassel lenses seems to cost a lot as well Anyway, thanks for the advice. I’ve watched tons of different reviews. However at last, I’m afraid that’s a question only I myself can answer. Probably better to actually try them and see

[@jpdj2715]

@@keith5824 - Yes, try and see. If try is difficult, rent first. As to 16 v 14 bits, note that a certain semiconductor manufacturer now sells sensors with integrated (baked onto) AD conversion. At the semiconductor interface level, these communicate in 16 bits and this is what their marketers communicate in their website. If you read the small print, they admit that of these 16, only 14 bits are photographically meaningful and the other two bits are used at the interface protocol level (they could just be a tag to indicate if the other 14 bits in the 16 are red, green or blue.) You really have to go into the camera's menu to see what setting you can make. Also note that 16 bits in a Hasselblad does not give you a larger color space - which DxO rates the same as of top 14 bit full frame cameras. Then what does it give? Better gradation resolution: the ability to discern more fine nuances. Color space define the extremes, like dynamic range. The bits define the nuance levels. In Heaton's case with his sometimes moody very finely nuanced pictures, I am inclined to advise 16 bits, but you need really large prints and an extreme printer in gradation to be able to visualize that. Probably it is easier and cheaper to convert your files-to-be-printed into 32 bits in Photoshop. After you cleaned up in one Topaz and maybe even scaled up in another Topaz app.

[@theshortlist]

Same sensor as my Fuji GFX 50r, and that one is not compatible with C1... but i stil want to test it on a tech camera Arca RM3D...

[@iFlashasten]

I like this channel because of shooting mostly with 5d mk4. It's so good camera and I like he's still using it in time when mirorless is so popular.

[@0zymanndias773]

Would you say a X1d I is a better option?

[@inthestudy]

Would you revisit it with a 51x51 square sensor?

[@desgardner7169]

Fair comment!.......but somebody will buy it though and think they will get better pictures with it. Thank you for your time...

[@JoachimDyndale]

I couldn’t agree more with your assessment. I’ve used the X1D for 2+ years and ultimately switched to the GFX100 precisely because, for that price, the camera needs to be more versatile. Seeing as the one you just reviewed is even less versatile than the X1D, well... Also, you’re an amazing photographer, so you’ll definitely get a lot out of the GFX line - so I highly recommend that :)

[@Dannnnnnnnnyy]

under the film advance winder is the camera curtain release, so you don't have to hold the shutter open :)

[@arricammarques1955]

The CVF II 50C + Hasselbald 503CX. Carl Zeiss 50mm, 80mm & 150mm.

[@mascmedia_]

It's nice to see a real review with reasoning, as opposed to someone just spouting off specs and hyping up the camera because they are sponsored. I'd personally love a Hasselblad with a digital back, but I probably would struggle with it given the style of work / images that I do.

[@andrewporfyri559]

Not a studio camera at all,it’s a modular camera which was designed with V system photographers in mind and it’s also a great tool for Architectural photographers who can attach the digital back to almost any technical camera with movements for perspective & depth of field control not to mention being able to stitch panoramas for landscapes Different tools for different applications and this camera is not designed to compete with the likes of the GFX in any way at all, they are 2 totally different systems

[@hybryd83]

I was really cheered up last year when they've announced this camera. Hearing your opinion I have to agree that Hasselblad sacrificed the functions. Thank you for sharing your thoughts.

[@hudwa]

About the two technical issues you experienced using the back on the film body: I'm surprised that the back doesn't have a simple exposure simulation mode. It doesn't make sense to have the image at a constant exposure on screen... And about having to hold the shutter button down to use the back, have you tried mirror lockup? I know that some model Hasselblad bodies don't have this feature, but this seems like the perfect time to lock the mirror in up position, thus exposing the sensor.

[@TheGazmondo]

I think you will find using the mirror lock up won’t let you view through the lens, it’s to prevent the mirror returning during a prolonged exposure, when you eventually fire the shutter on the lens it’s self.

[@raycavicchiophotography4832]

@@TheGazmondo Bulb mode on lens

[@leemski]

Indeed, that Hasselblad looks beautiful. Turning an old film body into a modern era digital (sort of) camera is awesome. No histogram for shooting outside is very tricky. Shooting landscape, often under demanding weather conditions is what I would want to do with this kind of sensor - but no weather resistance of any kind sounds like a joke (what's more, for its price tag). In a fact there could be an option for an attachable digital viewfinder (another £1500?). Live view is insanely cumbersome when mounted on a film body. Shiny screen, outside, in full sun must be a pain in the neck too. Yeah, there is a lot of drawbacks in this Hasselbald body. And the PRICE tag? £5400? Bling bling, No other comments. FUJI GFX 50 R wins and is the right answer. Totally agree with you! Thanks for this honest review. Heading up to get FUJI ;) half price of the Hasselblad, YAY!

[@medes5597]

It has weather sealing. It's not as robust as a DSLR and pros are customising them to give them even better weather sealing so they can use them a bit more widely (although honestly why not use the X1D if that's what you want). The screen isn't shiny, it's anti glare and is designed to adapt to bright sunshine or poor light on the fly and it does a good job There *was* an EVF accessory planned but here two years later and it's been scrapped with the company now pushing the screen as a "TLR Style viewfinder" in recent literature pushing the company Honestly used one for two days, loved it, but also felt like it had an awful lot of drawbacks for it's price. If I was a wedding photographer though I would buy one in a heart beat. The look of it alone would justify your price to clients. I know this was an old comment. Just chipping in with my 2c.

[@carlosgastelum8251]

I had the GFX 50s and 4 lenses for 2.5 years, I sold everything and bought the 907x. 90%of the time the Gfx will be a better tool for the job but the 907x makes me happy, and I can fit it on my 503cw and on my Alpa Swa which was the main reason I switched. That said one of the cons of this system is that the cost of native xcd glass is around 1.5 to 2x the cost of Fuji Gf lenses so add that to your budget.

[@BenjaminKanarek]

Totally opposite for me. When I shot the Swarovski Crystal Ad campaign, I shot it with a Hassy, as that is what was available at the studio hired by the prod company. I find Hasy's so slow and cumbersome compared to the 50Ss'. I couldn't be happier with the GFX. Let's not forget those Fujifilm firmware updates as well. The 50s is so accurate at AF and those lenses are amazing. I presently have their 45, 63, 110, 120, 250 and 32-64. It serves me very well indeed!

[@carlosgastelum8251]

@@BenjaminKanarek I completely understand, if I was using the camera commercially then the GFX will make more sense. I like shooting with my Alpa and that takes ages to set up, so the slower speed of the hasselblad is not an issue for me. Also I needed the hasselblad since I can mount it on the Alpa, if Fuji made a digital back I would have gotten that instead.

[@LuciusGraciusMaximus]

most important con : sensor size isnt 6x6

[@BeePee1503]

The fuji and Hasselblad have the same sensor but vastly different image quality. The Hasselblad color science is on another level.

[@enigmabletchley6936]

I'm a former Hasselblad film shooter so naturally I am attracted to the 907x. In fact, my dream would be the 907x back (the CFV50C) paired with the Hasselblad SWC as the lens is possibly one of the finest ever made. However, I already committed to the Fuji GFX system as my MF camera of choice before the 907x was introduced. When the 907x became available I decided to spend the day with my GFX50R set up with a 1:1 viewfinder mask and set to a black and white simulation. I also used the flippy screen only as per the 907x. I came back with beautiful images. There is no doubt in my mind that GFX50R is the better solution. It is bigger and heavier but the ergonomics, weather sealing, versatility (film emulation, histogram, function buttons etc) make it a no brainer for landscape shooters, as well as pretty much any other genre except for action and wildlife. The other compelling reason is that although Hasselblad lenses are excellent, Fuji lenses are equally excellent but often at a third to half the price of the equivalent. If I could afford the 907x as purely an object, almost a piece of camera 'jewellery', if you like, I'd get it in a shot. Back in the real world, it would be a poor choice for anything but good weather shooting, as you point out. PS You forgot to point out that on the 500 series film body, it is in effect a crop sensor as it does not cover the full 1:1 aspect ratio, iirc?

[@nathanhirschphotography871]

Great review, Thomas. For the money I think the older Phase One backs are a better choice for the Hasselblad 500.

[@SloppyPastrami]

did you try the mirror lock up on your film hassy to live preview?

[@sportsshooter2574]

On an A3+ print from a normal viewing distance would you see the difference between the Blad and the 5D MKIV???

[@The_Moose_Trophy]

Are you going to switch to the GFX50R? Video?

[@carltanner9065]

I agree. Studio camera, portrait camera, casual landscape but not for a full on workhorse for landscapes and nature work. Not without weather sealing. Too risky, especially with what it costs. Like Leica, you're really paying for the brand name and whilst I like them, I wouldn't buy one as my main camera and they're just too pricey. Which is what it boils down to...the cost. The 50R makes far more sense and even a 1XD does, but I still wouldn't buy one with the Fuji's on offer. It sort of reminds me about guys that use waist level shooters for street photography and this camera might even make a great "yuppy" camera for street photography. Like those that use an M3 or M6 for street, this camera is a "status" symbol. A "red dot", a canted "H". Great pics for a premium.

[@stevenvanhulle7242]

3:48 Tom, the first version of the 907X user manual (dd. 2020-08-28) already mentions an optical viewfinder for the 907X.

[@timrobson8337]

Thanks for the thoughtful review. In my view, the 907x is all about the back, not the body, which Hasselblad has thrown in as a bridge to their current lens selection. I would venture that most of the people who buy this combo are going to set the 907x aside and never look at it again. If you set aside the back's pretty much seamless compatibility with (most) Hasselblad V-system camera bodies and all of the lenses, viewfinders and other accessories for those bodies, then the only possible conclusion is that it's not a wise investment. However, I'm looking to extend the versatility of eight V-series bodies, over a dozen C- and F-type Zeiss and Schneider lenses, bellows, metered and non-metered prisms and waist-level finders. I'm a hobbyist, not a professional photographer, so for me they're basically pretty toys. For me, the back is a no brainer, because I can get it brand new (with the useless body) for little more than I would pay for a used CFV back.

[@sundeepsembi6091]

Wondering what you think of the x1d v’s a gfx

[@250157andyw]

Yes - what about the H X1 DII? Interesting that all these ‘medium format’ cameras are just 44x33mm cf the ‘full frames’ at 36x24mm and the lens range is much more limited. Depends on what you want to use them for of course.

[@BackFocus11]

Thomas thanks for being honest on this review. You didn’t fall victim to becoming a fanboy just so you can get free stuff from a camera maker like many youtubers do. I’m sure Hasselblad/DJI won’t be sending you anymore gear after this review. Who cares. Honesty sets you free. Thanks Thomas!

[@mostazameansmustard]

It's so cool to see Tom Yorke doing a camera review.

[@gsrox2007]

If you do see this, please consider a new 645z body and used lenses. The 55/2.8 is weather sealed and cheap. The 90/2.8 is weather sealed and affordable used. The 80-160 is cheap. If you want a wider budget lens go for the 35/3.5. The 45-85 is a single "do it all" while being sharper than the used prices suggest. Batteries last forever. Great OVF and superb handling. I just bought into the system as it became really affordable.

[@R.Hogarth]

This might be a silly question, so forgive me if it is but since a Medium Format camera means carrying not only it but also Medium Format lenses, would something like a Sony A7R4 be an acceptable compromise? True, you would not get the 6.5x4cm sensor, but you would get the 61MP resolution and the GM lenses would be the same size (or very similar to) the L Series you currently use on your 5DMk4 without compromising on the lens quality.. I'm guessing that while you were on the F4 Tour, Nick Page and you had plenty of opportunities to discuss the pros and cons of entering the "Sonyverse".

[@fredrikwasland7167]

There is mirror lockup on the hasselblad, that would have made it easier to use with the digital back:) but i can see that its not for everyone🤣 nice review and honest:) keep it ut. Greetings from Norway

[@scottishtornado1889]

Rent a GFX for a few weeks. Adam Gibbs might have some recommendations on what editing software to use to bring the most out of the files.

[@antoniv01]

Thank's for your comment , solved a lot of doubts I had . You are honest and clear!!

[@jacolman]

Great review, thanks for an unvarnished real review!

[@NORTRONGAMES]

Will you be moving to sony tom ??.

[@gregorpichler5899]

Hi Thomas, I really like your reviews :)! I never used the 907x but I find the idea actually very nice, especially from a nostalgic point of view, but of course the price is really hefty and the camera alone faces many limitations. However, its versatility in combination with the modular system of the 500 Series is actually really great. Have you ever thought about using it with a Hasselblad Flexbody for landscapes? But of course the lack of weather sealing still might be a problem... Short note: On CF lenses you don't need to keep the shutter pressed in bulb mode, rather switch it to the "focal plane shutter mode" which is indicated by the green F beside bulb, then the shutter keeps itself open. Have a nice weekend and best regards from Innsbruck, Gregor

[@silverdusssst]

Problem with digital MF is that its not a true 5x4 sensor, they're smaller formats than they were in the film days

[@MeOrNotMeWhoKnows]

"The ergonomics are not perfect" - that's to put it very, very mildly. It's a freaking box with no grip, not viewfinder, and a weird-ass knob in the front. xD

[@mikni4069]

That’s because it’s not meant to be used like that, it’s a modular system where you can upgrade it with a handle and viewfinder and all the gimmicks you could ever wish for but that would make it even more expensive like $18-40.000

[@kerszz3547]

@@mikni4069 or you can just buy something like a GFX 50 which has all of the above included for $3-4k. Hasselblad is a ripoff basically

[@jean-claudemuller3199]

If you want an ergonomic perfect and less expensive body, you take the X1DII. Here you just have a modern V system back that can be converted to the X system.

[@storysupport]

Grip & viewfinder are available if you want them, they are just optional. That’s all. Easy solution

[@jean-claudemuller3199]

ergonomics are never ideal, even with OVF and grip, only the X1DII has ideal ergonomics. The OVF only shows focal length between 21mm and 45mm, and 45mm is tiny for the eye. The central cross in the viewfinder for the central AF has a vertical parallax shift that can bring some problem by pointing the wrong place for critical subjects. The grip is square shaped and is not ideal in the hand like the X1DII grip, if I am right the vital AE-L button of the X1D is missing. I can't understand why some people say that X1D ergonomics are BS and 907x would be great ! The 907X ergonomics are usable, even best for some special applications, but in general use the X1D is way better, faster, more confortable. (I have both cameras, X1D for 2 1/2 year and 907x with OVF for 1 1/2 month)

[@DavidHarrisGRI]

Is it the format or the resolution that makes the difference you see in the images? It would be interesting to see you try a modern, high resolution full frame such as the R5 if you can find one, or A7r4 for comparison.

[@DannyChau7]

Love your honesty as every other reviews are all singing nothing but praises, the Fujifilm 50R and it's the perfect street camera for me.

[@ollielane656]

Thomas why didn't you make a video with your film camera with the digital back on it like you showed in this video? 3:00

[@johnwatson4695]

Good review for the positive aspects of the camera. If there is a love for viewfinders then this camera might not be the best, however, a hooded loupe solves the problem. It does have weather sealing, I don't know how effective this might be, lens, SD/Battery door and back all have rubber gaskets. Why is it not ergonomically good for landscape? Put it on a tripod, look down on the image and take a photo. Lack of histogram is a valid point and for me is the only point against the 907X. If the sun is a problem on the LCD use a hooded loupe, the one I've got weighs nothing. Great portability for general use with the XCD 45p lens. Fujifilm GFX 50R It's advantages are not significant and can be worked round. More importantly, you are not stuck with a big plasticky lump of a camera that feels cheap ;)

[@ArvindVallabh]

I might be wrong here but I thought u could link it with a cable to the side of 500cm to digital back.

[@NickGuttridge]

Leica s3 is weather sealed, with all the lenses! Three frames a second and it’s all about the optics. They out perform anything else I’ve tried. Even at 200% the images look perfect and the feel of the image has a more film like quality to it. It doesn’t feel digital. Ok, it’s about 30k. But you could spend 15-20k on a full Fuji system especially if you bought the gfx100. The Leica is a better camera for a ten year investment. Less likely to go wrong, much better made. Or just continue to use your film back, industry standard in the old days. Beautiful glass. Can’t beat that. Not weather sealed, that was my thought as you finished off.

[@tjmanou6422]

Does it have a hot shoe for studio shoot?

[@gsrox2007]

Used 645z bodies with under 20K actuations are also great value at roughly 50% the price of a new one.

[@josephasghar]

I use a 5dsr and S1r for work, but for landscape and personal enjoyment I take my 2005 PhaseOne with me. The files still hold up.

[@DodoKing187]

will we see the actual photos of the 501 + digi back session you did in the woods?

[@mizuhokusuha]

Thank you for the honest review. Using it with a hasselblad 500 series was my real question and how did it handle.