MoFi Triple 8's: Andrew Jones' Newest Masterclass in Audiophile Bliss!

[@ErinsAudioCorner]

These speakers are absolute junk. Send them to me instead of back to the manufacturer and I'll take care of the rest. LOL Great review, Ron!

[@Newrecordday2013]

I appreciate that and completely agree! I’ll make you a deal: I’ll send these pieces of junk to you, and you can send me those speakers you just reviewed in exchange. Thanks for watching, Erin. Stop telling people to put speakers 2 feet away from the walls! 😂🤣😅

[@ErinsAudioCorner]

@@Newrecordday2013 lol!!! from now on I'm gonna say you recommend putting them right next to the wall.

[@JamesWilliams-gf8gm]

@@Newrecordday2013 honestly I really liked seeing the in room measurements in the 1’ increments. Really puts some data to what we hear.

[@ichigobankai2343]

Most people dont realize that the bass/lower frequencies can change the way we hear the higher frequencies.

[@fonkenful]

And the reverse also holds.

[@ichigobankai2343]

@@fonkenful AGREE!!!!!

[@markovlasic1978]

transmission boxes are doin that job really good

[@ACM1000000PT]

@@markovlasic1978 transmission boxes have nothing to do with ichigobankai2343 comment.

[@ichigobankai2343]

@@chinmeysway I agree. Even frequencies we cant hear can effect the ones we do hear.

[@haasmail1]

I own these speakers. I’ve had many other speakers of higher cost. These are absolutely terrific. Ron, your reviews and your humble nature are appreciated. Top to bottom, these are extremely cohesive. You can not go wrong and the reviews like this are 100% on spot. I use Pass XA100.5’s with them; 200w pure class A. They also sounded amazing with my Audio Group Denmark Axxess Forte’ 3 integrated. I can’t wait to try them with some EL34 mono blocks.

[@globaltune8580]

One cool feature about this one is that it crosses over at 130 Hz to the base drivers. This means that you can implement Dirac live or other room correction (Lyngdorf, mini dsp, etc) as if these are subwoofers by adding two monoblocks directly to the woofers. Hello ganfet by Orchard. Then part of the crossover can be disabled. So you can feed only the coax drivers by a much smaller amp. Hello 300B SET. For the coax drivers the Crossover can be replaced by the one that gr research did for the source.point 8. Although, the 888 crossover is already way better than the one for the sourcepoint 8. From some of the show reports, the 888 already performed superbly well. But I believe with the changes above, that it would be very hard to beat. ⚡️⚡️⚡️

[@CButti-x1s]

Thanks! Fantastic review Ron. I've been waiting for the reviews to begin dropping on these in hopes that they lived up to the show hype they received. Looks like Andrew hit not only a home run, but a grand slam with these. So glad to hear about that smooth top end. I think I've found the upgrade from my current Q Acoustic Concept 50's! Keep up the great work!

[@Newrecordday2013]

Thank you!

[@ACM1000000PT]

Depending on the room size, i'd pick the concept 500.

[@michaelschultz1125]

Thanks for the very informative review.

[@Newrecordday2013]

Welcome!

[@The340king]

On my system, these speakers sound closer than anything previous to them in matching my home setup. The in room response helped with the bass on the last couple of sound clips. The holographic sound stage is an important part of the presentation that I could hear a tiny bit of in the in room response, especially in the vocal reverb. Sweet sounding speakers.

[@sudd3660]

i was thinking about that 130hz crossover point, there is some benefits with crossing over higher. those 70hz extra up to 200hz would have added some impact to the sound higher up. and made the crossover parts smaller, there are some huge coils involved the lower you go in hz, either lower the cost or used higher quality parts if you did so. assuming no other drawbacks..... and the midrange would have even less bass to play. that is my experience playing around with crossover from larger woofers to midbass drivers, 80hz to 300hz i have play around with. there is some magic happening when you let the larger drivers or larger cone area play higher up, assuming the cabinet and damping inside is up to the task.

[@daviddrake6875]

I agree. And Albert Von Schweikert does too. My VR-4 Generation II cross up to mid at 185 Hz. Also has lower at 65 Hz and double transmission line.

[@TheMirolab]

The three 8” drivers are fairly far apart, and the directivity narrows as frequency goes up. You will get beaming and phasing starting to happen as you raise the frequency, and I’ll bet that Jones labored greatly at settling on 130Hz. The reviewer stated that driver integration was superb, so I’m thinking Jones chose correctly.

[@sudd3660]

@@TheMirolab within hundreds of hz you are fine with meters of spacing, lets say 200hz you can place woofers a meter apart. and my point was the benefit from increasing the crossover point, not the possible drawbacks.

[@BostonMike68]

I think that would be low to crossover it wasn't using such a large mid . That's subwoofer territory. I have heard some expensive 3 ways that didn't blend right because they crossed low with to small of a mid . On the other hand I have designed a 2 way with a 10 "woofer crossed at 1400 with a 3 rd order crossover that sounds and measured amazing. I can crank it with no distortion, but the cabinet is built like a tank literally.

[@chrisvand2678]

Fantastic review, Ron. You and Erin are hands down the best in the business.

[@Newrecordday2013]

Ah thanks! Erin is fantastic!

[@wendellgayheart9228]

Thinking on purchasing the 10s in the near future…good video without cutting anyone’s throat 😜👍🏻

[@DonnieMulligan]

Great Work Ron!

[@Newrecordday2013]

Many thanks!

[@RUMBLEGO1]

Haven't even started the review and just wanted to comment on how much I turned up that opening unboxing jam!! That was fun!! :)

[@nathanevans6277]

That Dominique Fils-Aimé album is stunning. If fact her entire catalogue of 4 studio albums is stunning, I can't choose a favourite.

[@dan-qe1tb]

I had listened to them with Andrew! I hadn't known he would be giving a demo in person that day.

[@markhershberger9477]

Hi Ron, thank you for your astutely informative review. After watching this review, the following question arises to me as a regular viewer and subscriber, and occurs to me seeming as the “elephant in Ron’s video” 😉……what speaker, if having to choose among them, do you prefer for your listening?……the 888’s, the Caladans, or the Bullys? Music dependent? Mood dependent? Or hands down unqualified favorite? Thank you for considering!

[@Newrecordday2013]

Time Stamps: 00:00 - Introduction 05:31 - System Synergy 06:49 - Listening Impressions 06:52 - Treble Impressions 11:50 - Off Road 13:37 - Midrange Impressions 16:56 - Bass Impressions 19:42 - Soundstage Impressions 21:05 - Sound Clip Comparisons 25:42 - Speaker Measurements 30:21 - Final Thoughts

[@estoyconfused]

I guess you forgot to timestamp this one. No worries. I gotchu, NRD Hawk Tuah reference 19:41

[@Retro_Analog]

Ron this review reinforces your Goat 🐐 reviewer status ‼️

[@avjake]

I wish I had a listening room deserving of these beauties. Can Andrew Jones design or what?

[@ufarkingicehole]

I really wish this had a transmission line set up along with the coaxial driver.. I would be all in

[@HighResStereo]

I’m more than happy with my Mofi SP 10 these also look great though!! Great review!!

[@Newrecordday2013]

Glad you like them!

[@Pok-001]

I think I would like the 10s better myself. Of course I would be adding a pair of subs. lol.

[@don1946]

Ron, you have done it again, another great insightful review. The triple 888's are from a designer who has hit his stride and works with a company that provides a reasonable budget. No problem with the $5,000 price, just wish I had the room 😢

[@Newrecordday2013]

Thank you!

[@JRadian]

On my setup, Sourcepoint 10 sounds closer to Reference recording than 888, especially in the vocals. I would add 2 fast subs to Sourcepoint 10's and DSP out the tiny bit of roughness in upper midrange.

[@Mishael_Agyei-Boamah]

lol chck your ears... the 10s add a shimmer I found annoying and not needed on songs... as most songs have enough shimmer already

[@MotownAudio]

I have the 10’s and I added a Martin Logan dynamo 1100 sub, and E.Q the treble on some tracks -2 db and it’s absolutely amazing

[@paulchristman4918]

I absolutely loved the comparisons. The 888's sounded amazingly beautiful 💜

[@Newrecordday2013]

Hey, thank you so much. I do appreciate it.

[@dawolyan13]

Once again, great post. Thank you bro.

[@daviddrake6875]

Boy! These Jade Audio JT-1 headphones crank out the bass! And very well balanced and detailed.

[@yippie6862]

I preferred the sound of the 10 from the sound samples. In person that may change.

[@Newrecordday2013]

The 10's are fantastic! Im a big fan of those speakers.

[@yl1974]

I as well. To me they sounded closer to the reference tracks.

[@oohtob6685]

Me too 10s for me.

[@bearclaw5115]

I can hear what Ron is talking about, the extra crispness in the vocals and the extra bass in the vocals too. It seems the 888's are more natural, closer to the recording but the 10's may be more exciting for some.

[@cruise2023]

@@yl1974 Agree!

[@richh650]

Excellent in-depth review Ron! Andrew Jones is certainly running white hot in his designs.....

[@JoeDogInKC]

The 10’s seem to more closely resemble the original reference tracks. The low end sounds fantastic in the clips of the 888’s, but is artificially accentuated IMO. I could easily hear the difference shown in the graphs.

[@ufarkingicehole]

@@JoeDogInKC how do you come to that conclusion? You've heard them side by side?

[@JoeDogInKC]

@@ufarkingicehole I came to that conclusion by listening to the audio in the video on headphones with the descriptions showing what was playing. Now, it is possible that NRD had different EQ settings set for the 888’s that he had dialed in and forgotten about, but I did make an assumption that with the intent being that we were supposed to listen to the differences, he would have left the same EQ settings to compare them all.

[@Newrecordday2013]

@JoeDogInKC No EQ is used. You are hearing the speakers recorded with nothing altered or changed other than volume matching. Thanks!

[@JoeDogInKC]

@@Newrecordday2013 Awesome, thank you for confirming my assumption there. The 888’s do certainly sound great and likely more pleasing to most people, even if not quite as accurate.

[@carlsitler9071]

John Hunter, from Rel, has a video showing how to set the gain on a sub. Basically, you don't listen to the base but instead, you listen for peak performance of mids and highs. I figured it would also apply to my bi-amped quad 15" woofers as well and I was right. My MTMs achieved a massive improvement when I tuned the base correctly (they were previously too hot).

[@Scav68]

I feel like I can hear the cabinet of the woodwind instruments better with the 888. Where the vocals sound more forward on the 10 but more balanced on the 888

[@mikegallagher2732]

THANKS RON !!!!!! STELLAR Review !!!!! And i Value your reviews over ANYONE... Looks like I'm Selling My Beloved Klipsch's for THESE .. ASAP...I have Been DYING for a review on These ever since Andrew Debuted them !!!

[@hifiman4562]

Hmm, how about LS Encore sitting on a double stack of GR Research servo subs? For less money?

[@TheAgeOfAnalog]

This

[@mrt6349]

Problem for us Europeans is we cant easy get GR equipment, unfortunately.

[@rikardekvall3433]

@@mrt6349No. purchase at GR research homepage , it will calculate freight cost and all. Add on VAT and you got. Even cheaper then CSS from Soundimport.

[@talents010]

Ok, now it's time to please compare these to the Caladan.

[@tommyK7282]

Now we need the triple 10.

[@boneseyyl1060]

I agree with the review. A slightly leaner, maybe more detailed lower midrange. Great bass response. But looking at the price and then looking at my smallish room, I think a pair of SP 8's and subwoofer would be close enough and save quite a few bucks. Really impressed with how close these speakers come to the reference recording though. Well done Andrew.

[@Newrecordday2013]

Well said!

[@glenschneider5978]

Why only compare to Mofi? Why might someone opt for these over some of your other favorites or the other way around?

[@boneseyyl1060]

@@glenschneider5978 I assume you are asking Ron, but I think I understand why. The sound signature is essentially the same as the other models. I believe he has already compared a pair of the Source Points to other speakers in another review.. Doing it here would not not be much different and esentially repetitive. The real question in this review, is why would you choose the Triple 8's, over the other Source Point models? And is the the extra cost worth it. I think that is what Ron was trying to answer with this review.

[@jimx1169]

Great review, Ron. The 888s are on my short list for my new house.

[@psyphonyxaudio]

MOE FI !!! ... I like the style on these =)

[@rjclendenning]

This is why legendary speakers like the Kef 104/2 do exactly what the triples do…crossover at 150hz to their twin internal 8 inch paper bass drivers. It creates a magic midrange and pure music!!

[@evilmonstertruck]

5k for a pair of speakers is getting super tough to choose!! These caladan, something for GR Research. I really want to know which one would be best?

[@BrentLeVasseur]

There is no empirical “best”, just what is best for you, and that depends on a whole host of variables such as the size of your listening room, configuration, what kind of music you like, what kind of bass you like, whether the speakers will double for home theater, etc…

[@homeaudiobasics]

Just wait till you hear the new SVS prime pinnacles

[@evilmonstertruck]

@homeaudiobasics Haha I know. Another 5k pair I believe!!

[@BrentLeVasseur]

@@evilmonstertruck Having said that, You can’t go wrong with the Caladans. Clayton Shaw is a genius.

[@bearclaw5115]

Glad you reviewed these Ron (of course you would, there awesome!). If these things do not offend your highly trained ears then there is no way they aren't good enough for me!

[@bradloseke9725]

Would you pick those over the Brute?

[@PossibleAudio]

To hell with the speaker! That intro music is dope AF!!!

[@CashGravel]

But are they better than the LRS encore upgraded kit with the open baffle servo sub inquiring minds want to know

[@jimx1169]

Great review, Ron. Based on the sound samples it seems that the 888s would sound their best with a few more dB of volume compared with the SP10s. As always, YMMV. Cheers!

[@lithiumstatic]

The 10's don't sound vastly different than the 888. It's noticeable when pointed out, but not a deal breaker on the 10's. Very interesting.

[@mikehanks1399]

So glad I subscribed.

[@Newrecordday2013]

Heck yeah!

[@JamesWilliams-gf8gm]

Ah man Erin beat you to it by a few hours… so I am not watching this… lol. Just kidding, checking it out now.

[@Newrecordday2013]

I couldn’t let him have all the fun!

[@fonkenful]

@@Newrecordday2013I can’t be the only subscriber with my headphones at the ready, awaiting the inevitable sound clips; regardless of what some YT experts proclaim, I find they can be a useful tool in showcasing the highlights of differences between speakers, and to paraphrase one of that cohort “the only person to whom you need to justify your subjective opinion is you.

[@Harrisongrey19]

@@fonkenfulif your room and equipment is the same

[@fonkenful]

@@Harrisongrey19I’ll disagree with you there in part; insofar as when listening to numerous of Ron’s sound clips over the past year or so, I can definitely hear differences - some subtle, others not so much. I’m well aware they can’t tell me what any of this gear would sound like in my own rooms. Even with over 50 years in this hobby listening to a high end system in an audio shop’s frankly pretty lousy front room - which I did just yesterday - can’t adequately demonstrate what that gear would do in my space. As much as I don’t enjoy the overall headphone experience, it certainly has its merits with well recorded and produced audio.

[@chrishamilton5960]

Listening samples you can definitely hear the difference in soundstage width and the bass is so much richer on the triple 8s.

[@Cookie-mg8wf]

Hey Ron Can you pleeeease tell Danny to speed up the development of those new monitors he spoke about in his new video ? Haha; just joking

[@joenovak6393]

For pricing I would like to compare with Fyne Audio F501SP. I would put all the chips in with Dr. Paul Mills (the former head of engineering at Tannoy) at Fyne Audio.

[@PeterPuno]

Thank you for the review! Will ask what should sound better, these speakers or the Sourcepoint 8 with 2 sealed subwoofers?

[@FOH3663]

In my opinion, no question ... Triple 8's hands down.

[@bearclaw5115]

Well, the 8's are going to be playing bass through it's only woofer, coloring the mids a bit and reducing the soundstage unless you cross them over really high. But then you end up with localizable bass from the subs so they must be positioned symmetrically near the 8's. And you have to really know your stuff in terms of integrating the subs in order to get them sounding good. I think it would be easier to end up with a great result with the 888's but your approach could work well if done right.

[@PeterPuno]

@@bearclaw5115 thanks for the response. If you were integrating just one sub with the 8’a what crossover setting would you start with

[@TheAgeOfAnalog]

@@bearclaw5115localized bass below 150hz? Probably not.

[@mwahlert]

Would have loved to hear them vs the Caladans.

[@TheAgeOfAnalog]

of course, the same thing could be accomplished with the SourcePoint 8s or 10s, with a pair of subs featuring high pass crossovers.

[@kvrhifi]

I am big fan of Andrew jones concentric speakers but Very disappointed with source point 10 . They were super-hot on top, played by little hifi rose amp, I couldn’t stand more than minute. Walked out from room. Seems all those things addressed with 888. Great review. Ron explained very well issue with source point 10 and what to expect from 888. Sound clips of 888 sounds clean.

[@stevieg2755]

Except putting hipass filters in the mix,

[@bearclaw5115]

The 10 is only hot by 2db up top. Yes, I would pass on them too. Fortunately the SP8's are voiced neutrally up top, have you tried them?

[@Philear4124]

It will have to wait until August 2024 here in Belgium before we can hear this in real life. As you say yourself: hearing them in real life has an even better impression than the sound clip. Although the sound clips already give a clear picture, especially since you played the 8, 10 and 888.

[@TonyFoster-i9t]

Just FYI, I wouldn't trying to sell your 10's right now unless you are willing to take a bath on them. They aren't selling used because the 8s are considered better by most, are half the size, and only $2,000 right now. Also, if you get subs and can't high pass the main speakers, then try plugging the ports. This will also mechanically limit the woofer excursion and likely improve both the bass and the midrange.

[@jyharris]

Another entertaining review! Thank you! I wonder if my 18' x 12' room can handle these. Just because I'm looking at buying my fourth set of AJ speakers does not mean I'm an AJ fanboy!

[@rickyblair2375]

Wow, that first clip comparison was way more obvious than I expected

[@Newrecordday2013]

Hey Ricky, I had a feeling you were gonna notice that one!

[@timhermann2226]

I really enjoyed the review. I currently have a vintage 80's solid state system and have been working coming up with a more modern system and these speakers are on my list. Did you test these out with any of your tube gear, maybe the Black Ice integrated amp you reviewed in the past?

[@Exgol2005]

As always, creative presentation AND informative

[@Newrecordday2013]

Thanks again!

[@sudd3660]

just to clarify, it is dual eights for bass duty. the top one is midrange.

[@Newrecordday2013]

Thats correct!

[@jakep8484]

Whats the speakers that throw the best 3d sound stage? I designed and built an amp that has the soundstage and slight warmth like a good tube stereo but it sounds more clear and dynamic too like a good solidstate amp and has nice organic 3d imaging so would like to find the speaker most known for 3d imaging to get the ultimate life like personal mini concert 😀

[@AJ-zl8bz]

Just had to comment, I always come back bc you break down things like the 130 crossover. I enjoy taking this information and adding it to my audiophile journey. (Also me, how can I get an audio barn ;) ) p.s. are we sure no hawk tuah is required 😂

[@Newrecordday2013]

Man I sure do appreciate that!

[@AJ-zl8bz]

@@Newrecordday2013 I love a good side quest, never stop taking the side quest for us :) happy 4th.

[@VacuumTubes]

Take it off baby! Look at the woofers on that!

[@thomaswachter7782]

Very good review, Ron.

[@Newrecordday2013]

Thank you kindly

[@subcoded]

I'm obsessed with your reviews... Reference audio reviewer... PERIOD.

[@Newrecordday2013]

Wow thanks!

[@ChrisJohnson-c3s]

Nice video Ron

[@DantesInFresno]

You make mention that other speakers you’ve reviewed provide a better soundstage reaching further around the listener. Could you tell us what speakers come to mind?

[@bencarignan2711]

Excellent review. Very thorough.

[@Newrecordday2013]

Thank you kindly!

[@bencarignan2711]

@@Newrecordday2013 Ron, I really enjoy the comparison between the sound clips, but I think you can take it a step further using shorter clips at times. For instance, playing just 2 or 3 seconds worth of drums on the reference, and then on the speaker being reviewed, would make it even easier for people to hear the difference between the dynamics and impact of the two speakers. A drum sample that starts high and then descends lower and lower into deep, bellowing, thunderous impacts is such a great way to examine a speaker's ability to recreate low end and dynamics accurately. There's a great video on YT titled " Drum Collections - High End Audiophiles SoundCheck - NBR MUSIC." From drum nares, to deep impacts, it's a great jam session style recording. The whole recording is fun to listen to, but there's a great section from the 9 to 9:15 mark that starts high and descends lower with great impact. Probably a great section to compare the ability of two different speakers. Keep up the great work amigo!

[@Newrecordday2013]

@@bencarignan2711 thanks for the suggestion, I’ll look into that!

[@legrandgroves8560]

I still have Gallo 3.1’s i love’em. I wonder how these compare

[@dougg1075]

Man they look great. Reviews are very very good Ron

[@Newrecordday2013]

Thanks 👍

[@yanrad]

My unifi 2.0 speakers are sobbing. Thanks a lot Ron! 😂

[@peterbaugh51]

On my cheap system the 10's were very close to source. 888's had much more, deeper bass. I would pick the 888's because I don't use subs. Tried them, don't like what subs do to music overall. You can always turn down bass and hear more midrange, but you can NOT get more bass from a speaker that is not capable of deeper bass (my past B&W's come to mind). Just my thoughts listening with Elac Debut Reference's. Great review. Andrew Jones did it again!

[@ACM1000000PT]

subs do the music very well, the thing is... you KNOW HOW TO PROPERLY INTEGRATE the dual subwoofers in the chain?, the answer very often is NO.

[@dagreatstoney.5869]

Great review tks . These look like a buy👍 when theres some 💰💰💰

[@Justwantahover]

For beginner speaker builders who want to do a similar driver setup, use a 100 mf cap on the top bass/med driver to get about 130 hz cutoff.

[@michaelschultz1125]

Would these be okay in a small room situation?

[@Newrecordday2013]

I don’t think so. I think the bass would be overwhelming.

[@michaelsegel8758]

Nice review. I hate to say it... but both the 10 and the 888 sounded great. A slight edge to the 888 and I have to believe that they would sound even better in person. ( I'm using Dita Project Ms for my IEMs and no EQ. ) I can't be the only one to have a hard time hearing much of a difference. Anyone else? Price wise... $3K (Point 10) vs $5K (888s) either would be a good fit depending on budget. BTW, Erin's review is out now... my next thing to listen to.... :-)

[@bearclaw5115]

I can hear the difference fairly easily. The 10's have crispier vocals and more bass intrusion into the vocals as well. The 888's come off as more pure to the source but maybe less exciting depending on your point of view. For someone like Ron, these differences are everything. For most of us either will do just fine.

[@michaelsegel8758]

@@bearclaw5115 I should clarify... I could hear a slight difference... and yes the 888s sounded cleaner... but it was subtle and both were extremely close to the source. I mean if you weren't paying attention and doing casual listening... you probably couldn't tell which was which. Its not like a night and day difference.

[@jfritzy4358]

You likely are already aware of "Birds" by Dominique fil amie. Great vocal and some interesting sonic content. First time listening surprised by sounds appearing in thin air around and above me. In the Sound Shed bet it would be special.

[@Newrecordday2013]

Very familiar with that track - it’s fantastic

[@robh9079]

Great review. If you add subs it might be worth putting an inline filter to the mains to roll off the bottom octave and let that mid bass driver work less...

[@larrygaines7462]

Tell Andrew to make a dual 10. With a 6in carbon fiber source point top section . Now active crossover and choices of class A tweeter amp.the class AB for mid bass.then use class D for the 10's. You could offer different amp combinations by budget or room configuration. The old out of business mcm had a 6.5 with dome two way that were superb source point after addition of a real good crossover. Humm

[@scootergants]

This or The Bully? Real Q 😁

[@MadLadsAnonymous]

Would love your take on any of the following: • ATC SCM40a • Paradigm Founder 120H • Philharmonic BMR Monitor v2 (not towers) • Alta Audio Alyssa (bookshelves) • Closer Acoustics Ogy • Monitor Audio Studio 89 • Fink Team Kim

[@bearclaw5115]

My guess he'll like the ATC's for their fantastic midrange. He's probably going to love the Alyssa's for their detail. He won't get on with the Studio 89's that well as they lack some body to notes. Great list.

[@MadLadsAnonymous]

@@bearclaw5115 Thanks! My older cousins and family friends were always into HiFi growing up, so now that we have our own place, it's fun to explore this space again as an adult and find a system that suits my listening needs.

[@michaelschneider-]

Tannoy Tannoy Tannoy ..... Do a shot everytime this dude says "Texure" ...

[@SteveWille]

So can you get the advantages of the 888s by using 10s or 8s with a sub crossed at 130Hz?

[@carlsitler9071]

How do they sound at VERY HIGH VOLUME? This is very important to me. A single 15" woofer per speaker started to distort at high volume so I added a second 15" woofer so they wouldn't have to work as hard. 8's are so much smaller.

[@Mishael_Agyei-Boamah]

you need to dispel notions... your ears will suffer before the speaker even starts to notice their too loud

[@mudibluz2006]

These or perlisten r7t?

[@flex-cx9bi]

To me Poinsource 10 sounds more simlar to your reference tracks.

[@bobslave7063]

Nice review, thanks 🙏

[@AUDIO-U4YA]

Boy oh boy! It must be hot in the sound shed because NRD is on fire! You are pumping out great reviews like there is no tomorrow! One question if you don’t mind, how big is your listening? Space?

[@Newrecordday2013]

Thanks! The shed is 28’ deep, 18’ wide and 11’ high.

[@stevieg2755]

Obvious question,triple eights or the Bullies,that's the direction I am leaning

[@bearclaw5115]

That's not obvious and what is your question?

[@stevieg2755]

@@bearclaw5115 which one to buy,what the heck do you think I was asking

[@mannycazz8018]

Well done good sir well done!

[@Newrecordday2013]

Thank you!

[@rikardekvall3433]

Ron. I do like the tweeter on my Encores. Choice, MoFi 8, MoFi 10 or NX-studios on Danny’s Double Trouble subs? Your take on that? I Don’t like fatiguing speakers but not silent on top. Do have severe tinnitus. But can hear all up to 12k.

[@ACM1000000PT]

this remember me a little of the concept 500 sound, just with more LFE and the concept 500 having better innert cabinet, more coloration and warmth? i had a KEF R and the concentric beneficts i only hear them when i get up from the chair, at listening position the c500 to me sound like my previous point source, i also think the c500 should sound more holographic wider

[@rajeevananthan4771]

No “Hawk Tuah” required 😂😂😂 Nice one Ron!

[@Newrecordday2013]

You got that right!

[@adsph]

Good take here Ron. Do you know the length of the warranty? Thank you.

[@mrpositronia]

130hz is a nuisance frequency in smaller rooms, ie. the room usually amplifies it. So crossing over at that point might be helpful.

[@user540000]

Those sound clips sound very clear out of my $200 speakers.

[@deanfisher1656]

'Heard these at Axpona…..blew me away at their price point.

[@hirdeshirde]

Source point 10 are much more closer to reference tracks . I think source point 10 plus sub woofer will be better than 888. Source point 10 bass is faster and clean.

[@rikardekvall3433]

Ron, you are great! You do have a vocabulary that would envy the AI author like hot knife in butter. Team up with SNL and write their monologue and we all are in heaven. Now, the cliffhanger, Caladan, Bully or the LGKs? Hmmmm

[@Newrecordday2013]

Haha! Thanks! Yeah, now that showdown would be intense!