Ronnie didn't "often" squat with 3-5 reps at all, he explained the 900 pound squat was all for the camera. He too trained in the mid-high rep range across all muscle groups.
@TypicallyUniqueOfficial6 ай бұрын
What does it matter? Ronnie was an n=1. People need to stop using random bodybuilders as examples.
@theiceman75906 ай бұрын
Yeah he didnt do deadlifts much either, just in that one dvd footage but the others he didnt do them.
@1TieDye16 ай бұрын
@@TypicallyUniqueOfficialbro but he’s my favorite bodybuilder bro he’s gotta know what he’s doing. he’s my idle bro
@KurokamiNajimi6 ай бұрын
@@TypicallyUniqueOfficial What would you consider proof of x training method/variable
@matusjurcik69746 ай бұрын
Thats kinda obvious as he was a bodybuilder first (and succesfull)
@artvandelay17206 ай бұрын
I usually do 10+ reps because it reduces joint stress, injury risk and makes it easier to do proper technique. There are some that are fine with low reps like squat though. There are also plenty like skullcrushers or preacher curls where the joint stress is below 10 reps is excessive.
@honeybrew50636 ай бұрын
I mostly do 8-12 on Compounds and 15-20 on Isolation. But it also heavily depends on the machine (e.g. on some Machines I do the full stack for 20+ Reps)
@omegaman_6 ай бұрын
Good stuff Wolf..
@LouisSerieusement6 ай бұрын
I admire your productivity, I hope you can still find time to enjoy non-work activities :) Thank you for sharing, great video !
@herbmerced77806 ай бұрын
How about a video for older guys in their 50s or 60s?
@stevemann12995 ай бұрын
12 to 20 with moderate weight its best for your joints.
@BjornJonasLarsson6 ай бұрын
great video as always! A friendly correction.. Small typeo at 1.21 15 reps @ 70% 1rm written out as x0.6 x 20 = 3600 in the calc example.. where it should be 300 x 0.7 x 20 = 4200 if following the V.O. "set of 20"
@DANA-lx8cv6 ай бұрын
I get bored doing high reps on compounds. I generally use 3 to 5 reps with 1 or 0 RIR, and throw in a lot of heavy singles. On accessory work, like curls and such, I do lots of reps. Not sure if it's optimal, but I want to be strong as well as looking good, and this seems to have worked well over the last 30 years or so of lifting, as I'm still improving in both 1RM strength as well as physique.
@Himhymn_6 ай бұрын
You might want to increase from 3-5 to like 6-8 if you want the best of strength and hypertrophy with the compounds. 3-5 is amazing for primarily strength gains though, if that is priority, but I like to hit both. Bonus points on minimizing connective tissue damage and minimizing injury risk (6-8 reps).
@legrandfromage96826 ай бұрын
That’s what gets you strong
@KurokamiNajimi6 ай бұрын
You don’t need to lift heavy all the time though and if you were intending to stay peaked year round it would make more sense to do it in a conjugate style with just 1 heavy set a week (maybe even less depending on the exercise)
@kobemop6 ай бұрын
High reps are rather just exhausting (cardiovascularly as well) and are hard to estimate how many reps you have left. For hypetrophy the effective rep range, 4 to 8 can be enough.
@KurokamiNajimi6 ай бұрын
@@kobemop You don’t have to estimate once you go to failure you’ll have a gauge of how many reps you can do with that weight and what a grindy 0 RIR rep feels like. As for how exhausting it is just depends on the exercise
@dannybyrnes10526 ай бұрын
I think as you gain knowledge of what works for your body, you incorporate both low reps high weight and lighter weight higher reps in your routines. Good video pal
@flow11886 ай бұрын
How Brad said by himself. The best you can do is to train your Muscles in the reprange of 6-(15)30+ Reps, to get the max stimulus.
@rockyevans15846 ай бұрын
How Brad said by himself? I don't care for your sentence man. Brad doesn't train close enough to failure, that's why he's a dyel despite all the studying and research
@flow11886 ай бұрын
@@rockyevans1584 And i dont care for your Sentence man. To train to failure is not necessary for Muscle growth. Your Point is Useless. You dont need to be an Astronaut to create Spacecrafts. He reached more Goals than you thats enough, and hes a well known expert and his studies and researches has the far most impact in Modern Bodybuilding.
@rockyevans15846 ай бұрын
@flow1188 no, but you do need to train at adequate proximity to failure. I appreciate any contribution towards exercise science, i wasn't saying anything bad about his accomplishments in the field. Just said he doesn't train hard enough to grow. You need to grow too, grow up.
@Burkhimself6 ай бұрын
Would like to see a vid discussing the different types/angles of shrugs ! Kelso, behind the back under handed, etc…..💪🏼
@Louis-uq2jc6 ай бұрын
Firstly, a new subscriber, and you have instantly become my favourite gym bro alongside people like Eugene, Jeff, and Kaseem. Your content is great, and the lengthened partial stuff I am loving. You've mentioned occlusion training, which is something I try to do with high reps on biceps/triceps. What are your overall thoughts on occlusion training? Thanks
@Louis-uq2jc6 ай бұрын
Also shout out to beard gang
@D91MartАй бұрын
Thank you so much for this video I have a heart problem and was told I can only do really high reps like 50 reps, it's nice to know I can grow muscle.
@Kax6786 ай бұрын
I find that with higher reps i tend to lose focus. When stick with 5-8 on compounds and 8-12 on isoltions i find that it easier to progressive overload, keep better form, less fatigue and it does not interfee with my boxing trainings as I don t get sore that much if at all
@nmnate6 ай бұрын
It can take a ton of focus to really push your higher rep sets hard. Sometimes I forget how many reps I'm at in a set... ugh! 😆
@Kax6786 ай бұрын
@@nmnate i just find it makes you stop becuse of the latcit build up insted of muscluar failuere and gets boring especially when you doing unilaterl exrcises
@repswithroscoe6 ай бұрын
Thank you Milo another goodie😎
@googlymooglyman6 ай бұрын
You should react to kneeovertoes guy. I just wonder if the stuff he pushes is actually important
@d3rpn1nj476 ай бұрын
Some is good but most of the science is bunk. I would ironically say for the most part his form is really good on the progressions.
@weekendwarrior81796 ай бұрын
I have found that using different rep ranges in the same workout is really good. Heavy on the first 2 modern on the next 2. And light on the last two or 4-6/ 8-10/ 12-15
@VertigoColdSweat6 ай бұрын
Another downside of really high reps is that the sets take a very long time to perform. If you take 3 seconds for one rep, a set of 10 will take you 30 seconds to complete. A set of 50, on the other hand, would take you 2.5 minutes to perform...
@1TieDye16 ай бұрын
Agreed, even 20 reps sets can feel pretty tedious with a moderate tempo. I can’t imagine 50 reps lmao
@bensbarbaro60216 ай бұрын
I try to spend just an hour in gym per visit with two pull days and two push days weekly. Four visits/week.
@dory_m786 ай бұрын
I disagree I need longer rest time when doing 10 reps compared to 15
@BenG-rd5wg6 ай бұрын
Could you please make a video on which types of exercises are more conducive to higher/lower reps?
@ParvParashar6 ай бұрын
Great video! 🙌
@KurokamiNajimi6 ай бұрын
My logic is just use the least amount of weight you can reach failure with for the exercise. If I was doing weighted push ups I could push a set of 30+ but if I’m doing a larsen press while it’s doable pushing 0 RIR 20 reps would be a challenge. It also depends on how much weight is used. For most of us a set of 5 on any bench variation isn’t even 200 so we don’t have to worry much about getting injured assuming other variables are taken care of
@brianforrester96706 ай бұрын
I'd be curious to hear the expert opinion on reverse pyramids, i.e. starting your lifts heavier for lower reps and progressively dropping weight for higher rep sets for the same exercise. For example, presses for sets of 6, 8, 10, 12, dropping weight for each set.
@dory_m786 ай бұрын
I do reverse pyramid sets for everything .I drop the Weight after every set but try to aim for same rep range. For heaving compounds I drop the second set by almost 10%. Isolation smallest change I can drop (usually 0.25kg)
@dhtgains20536 ай бұрын
I do 3-4 reps for the first 2 sets then do another 2 sets between 5-15 reps
@Dehura6 ай бұрын
Im curious to know differences of short rest vs rest pause. 🤔 Why people say that short rest is bad for muscle growth and rest pause sets are good. 🤔
@nygeek64716 ай бұрын
What about static exercises I.e. a farmers walk, what is best for hypertrophy there?
@nathanmeyer4906 ай бұрын
Great stuff here. Possible topic question--why is volume always referred to by sets? Shouldn't volume be delineated by effective reps and total amount of effective reps as the greatest indicator of growth and not sets? For example if max effective rep range is a given workout is 25-50 total effective reps, then wouldn't rest-pauses and drop set reps all count toward the effective total and reduce total amount of sets needed in any given week?
@moses96476 ай бұрын
I sort of infer that when referring to sets in terms of volume the idea is that those sets themselves are effective. There's obv discord on how many RIR is best for muscle growth (i.e. an "effective set") but at the end of the day my understanding is the sets should be meaningful ones and would inherently incorporate effective reps. As for cutting number of sets using intensity techniques like drop sets, I think it just depends on the person (as does everything tbh). HIT training at its core is about one set per exercise that goes beyond technical failure and incorporates exhausting the negative completely. In theory a shortcut to get what 4-5 sets gives you. But some people just need more training stimulus than that. To me the most important variable is what keeps you in the gym mentally and physically. At the end of you're training consistently and progressing over time you'll see gains. Everything else is preference
@alanfarquharhill6 ай бұрын
'Effective rep'/RIR are both still hypotheses at this point, and unlikely to be the whole story. Intensity techniques may well be useful, but there is literally noone serious who thinks that if you do 5 additional reps after 20s rest that this is the same as doing an additional set with proper rest time. A few months ago, I commented on here that if RIR theory was 100% true then a lot of power building and stuff like 531 BBB really wouldn't work *at all*, which again noone actually believes - and Milo replied that he agreed. The recent data definitely suggests that training hard, with low reps in reserve, is probably the most optimal way to generate hypertrophy.... particularly in more advanced trainees. But there is plenty of nuance still to be discovered I'd bet.
@ew-zd1th6 ай бұрын
Whats about potencial Hypertrophy type differences. Myofibrilar vs sarcoplasma. There are some evidence that pump style training can increase sarcoplasma
@MerelG-x5cАй бұрын
Can't you give some examples as to what exercised would benefit best from 15+
@miladranjbar10606 ай бұрын
Usually, for what trainings it is better to use higher repetitions?
@LarryShipeWorld6 ай бұрын
Where's the video where you completed Lyle McDonald's faliure challenge I keep hearing about?
Milo, do you think people are bad estimating their rir in high rep conditions because they are not accustomed to it?
@unicorn16556 ай бұрын
Is low rep high intensity effective if you don’t get your 10-15 sets per muscle group?
@Ultimatefitness3606 ай бұрын
Is it ok if i start my first set with 50% max than next set 65% max then final with 80% max ?? Plzz tell or suggest if any better way
@ساريالقبلي3 ай бұрын
God i love you , iam addicted to your videos
@swoleavocado6 ай бұрын
Does the efficacy of lengthen partials depend on rep ranges? 🤔
@theovercomer20066 ай бұрын
In these types of videos I'd like to hear more about what the size and duration of the studies was. To me the old theories on exercise science seemed more logical and made more sense. I wonder how much is phony science nowadays for clicks likes and views. To me it makes sense that higher reps would Target your red slow twitch fibers more and lower reps for white fiber. A lot of these types of videos just seem to muddy the waters and raise the confusion levels amongst the general viewing audience. What are your thoughts Dr. Wolf?
@Ultimatefitness3606 ай бұрын
Are very high rep range too much time consuming ??
@glenoh886 ай бұрын
All these studies/videos on rep ranges and techniques to maximize muscle growth. What about studies on technique and rep ranges to maximize recovery and injury prevention? A minor tweak and you may be unable to train a muscle for a week or more…that’s probably more impactful than the diff between 5 and 8 reps….
@xavierayayaell5466 ай бұрын
Just don't be a piss wet lettuce mate
@Pain539246 ай бұрын
Best exercises for forearms please
@lewisthelibrarian6 ай бұрын
Watch Jeff Nippard's videos on forearm
@Pain539246 ай бұрын
@@lewisthelibrarian That video was uploaded 4 years ago. Lengthened partials is a recent phenomenon. His primary focus was not on hypertrophy in that video.
@youtubeconnoisseur32156 ай бұрын
Would you consider making a video on arm training, not bicep or tricep training in general, but about programming? Do you think you will get any more hypertrophy gains from training your arms fresh, for example, with the Arnold spilled or push-pull legs where biceps are trained on push or triceps are trained on the pull?
@MrDjhealth6 ай бұрын
My Bro science opinion: extra high reps are good for nerve path development, and extra low reps performed with very good form are good to strengthen joints
@abssick1216 ай бұрын
I have noticed that Tom platz only did lying leg curls for hamstrings which are prob least optimal hamstrings exercise and his hamstrings were huge So I think that all this talk about lengthen partials and optimal exercises it's just good to for beginners or someone starting to use drugs (people who have fast muscle beginners gains which drugs do btw) and after pretty much maxing out your potential you're growing microscopicly so let's instead of maxing gains in eg 5 years a noobie will get them in 4 and a half years For someone who's been training hard for a long time doing some "more optimal" stuff isn't going to do any visible difference maybe under a microscope
@deltoidable5 ай бұрын
Consistency is more important than being optimal. Optimal just means getting the fastest results. A suboptimal workout could be getting 85% of your optimal results. If you're consistent for years you will eventually reach your limit, even if you're working out suboptimally
@Panagiotis17096 ай бұрын
I have a main compound movement I go heavy on at every workout (6x3) and then go high volume for everything else. I do 6 day PPL so at some point in the week I also do a variation of the compound for higher reps, for example 4x10 front squats while I do 6x3 for regular squats. Seem to be working pretty well.
@pandajohn59116 ай бұрын
6 sets of the same rep? Are you training hard enough if you can keep doing same rep number for 6 sets?
@Panagiotis17096 ай бұрын
@@pandajohn5911 It's more of a target weight. Once I can hit 3 for all sets I increase the weight so most of the time I am not actually getting 3 for all.
@kobemop6 ай бұрын
6 sets of 3 reps rather seems specific. Do you not ever evolve those sets and reps?
@gokukakarot18556 ай бұрын
For the algorithm
@NotBrye6 ай бұрын
Medium Reps :)
@corenko6 ай бұрын
4-8 on Compound lifts, 8-12 on Isolation lifts, no need to go above 12 in my opinion.
@varietyryan6 ай бұрын
look into muscle fiber types and what percent is in each muscle, you need to train high(20-30) medium (10-20) low (5-10) reps for maximum muscle growth, if you don’t go above 12 you’re missing out on all the slow twitch muscle fiber gains 💪🏽 also make sure to have a slow controlled (2-3sec) eccentric don’t let the weight fall .
@ratch33stokes396 ай бұрын
Hi @Dr Wolf , isn't it in a sense "fool proof" in the sense of both low heavy & lighter high repetitions will generally build muscle. So maybe choosing one style you like where you can really push yourself mentally.. Anyway love your vids & verified info.. 🎉
@TheHybrid3506 ай бұрын
great
@MestizoMentality6 ай бұрын
Never thought I'd say this, but I miss the Bro-Science days! I just want to go in the gym & pick things up & put them down. Too much Science makes lifting less enjoyable & feel like school!
@kobemop6 ай бұрын
I mean just lift how you want, it's not like you'll accelerate gains by gazillion percent. Sure there are somethings that can be optimized, but then again it's not gonna lead to major differences. People used to say that the "bro-split is bad," then studies came out saying that it's not bad or rather equal to other splits.
@Collect-it-Toys6 ай бұрын
1st
@alexanderchernoshtan98986 ай бұрын
Woof woof 🐶
@user-pn9un3dc8y6 ай бұрын
You need to do both.
@PlasticBagableАй бұрын
ok but what shirt is that though
@adrianthulin306 ай бұрын
but you're small?
@Coachahmadreza6 ай бұрын
@raoul90166 ай бұрын
Milo, is it true that you’re a furry?
@mrAngusGus6 ай бұрын
Wait what? Where are you sourcing this from? What's is fursona? Elpy, the Wolf of lengthened partials?
@martingamer55916 ай бұрын
This is straight up defamation 😂
@PierceRandall-hf7vf6 ай бұрын
Sets of fahve it is.
@lukeharris26226 ай бұрын
✝️💪
@BradSchoenfailed6 ай бұрын
Why does this guy always sound like he has a stuffy nose ?
@timmian856 ай бұрын
2/10 sweater
@AnnhilateTheNihilist6 ай бұрын
Milo. I like you and I think in real life we would be friends… but if I had one comment to say to you that disqualifies some of what you say it’s that you look like you have been working out less than a year. I realise u got ur PhD and that doesn’t give you much time off however you need 3-5 years in the gym to gain some credibility. Look at some other natty’s you can at least tell they work out. No offence intended sir, simply my thoughts.
@danielkanewske84736 ай бұрын
What else do I want to see from this channel ... Onlyfans link! The mind boggles at all the possible Wolf related material?!?!