History of Europe [800 - 1200]

[@hitmanmapping_6664]

Great video!Subbed!Greetings from Greece

[@historicalmapanimator6106]

Very good ! Your videos are increasingly huge

[@haraldwarberg9378]

Awesome vid

[@samg5183]

Keep it up bro

[@Albanian_History]

Forgot 1190 principality of Arbanon 🦅☧☦️🇦🇱✝️☧🦅

[@preslavmarinov2749]

Where is Volga Bulgaria????

[@vatterholm]

Early Norway is completely wrong though. And the later Swedish-Norwegian border too. How did you come up with that border?

[@classicmapper364]

Mistake: Swedes aren't the creators of Rus. They didn't colonized that much lands, only the Baltic sea's coast.

[@user-wf8do7uf8v]

Hey,when you continue mapping?

[@dimobogomilovvasilev3204]

MrRussianMapper you are in mistake my friend. ;)

[@classicmapper364]

Dulo Dynasty I know the history of Rus better than you dude, because I live in Russia. Swedes never formed a Rus, they have nothing common with the creation of Rus. The First Rurikovichs (that's a proven fact) aren't from Scandinavia, they are from Baltics or from Belarus.

[@nikjustnik8202]

actually its not swedes as in nation it was swedes as in 2 men created novgorod and the kievan rus

[@DreamWalkerVl]

+Dzoni01 In Sweden so badly taught history? People have already been there. They just invited the Varangians because of local civil strife. The Varangians are mercenary warriors or traders, came from Scandinavia or the southern Baltic sea coast, ie, he could be a Western Slav, although I am inclined to think that he was a Norman. But in Russian history there is no mention of the fact that Rurik was a Swede. This is nonsense.

[@eksiarvamus]

why did the Estonian islands go to Sweden in the 820s??

[@cccp8270]

Sadly is, that the GREAT Moravia has fallen.

[@TheoryMapping]

Top

[@user-wf8do7uf8v]

Bravo monci

[@atanasijezikic5961]

Веома добар видео

[@Viktor123Viktor]

Definig the opening period of the ancient russian state as being a part of 'sweds' is much controversial. A man from Scandinavia (or maybe Baltic - lands where presentday Latvia is located) was asked to come an unite east slavic tribes. No connection with 'Swedes' state located in Scandinavia that period.

[@draskobozic4976]

No. Vikings ruled over Russia for quite some time.

[@Viktor123Viktor]

First. Roerick was a viking just according to one of the versions of origin. Unconfirmed version. Second. Roerick's government had no relation to gothland vikings. So these territories should not be marked one color on the map.

[@ia3078]

​@@Viktor123Viktorlately many historians including Ryssian ones suggest that Rurik are Volga Bulgarians who are connected to Dulo clan and ruler Kubrat of Patria Onoguria a.k.a. Old Great Bulgariya.

[@deidara8neji]

Where is Cilicia ?? Anyway, good work !

[@italianmapperchris3168]

Wait so there was a Italy before the modern Italy. Very interesting.....

[@dripxyproductions]

What is Bulgaria doing as everything but Bulgaria first Ukraine then Romania, Serbia, and Greece. Then finally Bulgaria

[@sugandanataatmaja3331]

Masyarakat semakin mengetahui akar sejarahnya

[@tungstenalloynothingspecia2233]

The Normans become the second kings The Wessex become the first king of England by about 500

[@venomporywczym963]

Prusowie raczej nie utworzyli państwa

[@belaadorian3370]

Everybody can the historical territory of Bulgaria and Hungary

[@antoniopripizducci3465]

Dislike for "Sweden" in 850-s

[@proda12]

Pa ovde se vidi da su Franjevci napravili prvu tvornicu vafli na prostorima Zapadnom Balkana jos 800-te godine i na taj nacin na te prostore doneli civilizaciju :D.

[@supernibba9102]

actually Polans are Slavs but ok.

[@supernibba9102]

and Galicia is bullshit.

[@randomfantasy9523]

Krul Jutubufff hal of europe are slavs, this is the best temple duh

[@giorgi7913]

Georgia powerfull

[@comparisonofempires2226]

Bulgarian empire was bigger

[@DreamWalkerVl]

In Sweden so badly taught history? People have already been there. They just invited the Varangians because of local civil strife. The Varangians are mercenary warriors or traders, came from Scandinavia or the southern Baltic sea coast, ie, he could be a Western Slav, although I am inclined to think that he was a Norman. But in Russian history there is no mention of the fact that Rurik was a Swede. This is nonsense. Besides, firstly the Rurik headed the Novgorod Principality and then was captured Kiev and formed a unified Rus. Down vote for the distortion of the history of my country.

[@DreamWalkerVl]

+David is a fucking ravioli bottom text, The Slavs, which adopts the Swedish interpretation of history? This is ridiculous.

[@DreamWalkerVl]

Okey.