I like the aircraft you built in 1944, the horten ho 229
@sargaa84718 ай бұрын
that didn't aged well...
@christiancampi17365 жыл бұрын
Nothing is so beautiful than à flying Wing
@dannyl65075 жыл бұрын
Obviously you have never seen a sports illustrated swimsuit edition.
@luke_skywanker76434 ай бұрын
@@dannyl6507 🤣🤣🤣🤣👍👍👍👍👍👍
@johnsmithfakename84224 жыл бұрын
I consider flying wing aircraft to be the pinnacle of aircraft elegance. I want one.
@AndrewMellor-darkphoton2 жыл бұрын
It's sad they need a fast computer to work with instability.
@Catsrule1132 Жыл бұрын
Lipish delta 4 was tailless and was made in the 1930s
@jamesgoddard232126 күн бұрын
@@AndrewMellor-darkphotonYou’re wrong here. With a swept wing and dual rudders at the wingtips it’s plenty stable. I used to own a flying wing ultralight sailplane called a Millenium and it was plenty stable. Pitch was pretty sensitive but it handled turbulence at relatively low speeds pretty well.
@TastierBackInThe80s8 ай бұрын
Its beautiful. Elegant and sleek.
@dr.gudmundssonaircraftdesign5 жыл бұрын
That's a gorgeous airplane! I wish you all the best with the development.
@electricaviationchannelvid78633 жыл бұрын
motion agreed...
@death99ification Жыл бұрын
let's gooooo!!!!!!!!! Horten is still in the aviation game!!!!
@icorezx14r2 жыл бұрын
It's good to see Horten back in the hunt. Bravo!
@DruideRC5 жыл бұрын
this wing is a beauty please if you can, try to rebuild the legendary HO229
@MelindaGreen4 жыл бұрын
This looks like an improvement.
@Irobert1115HD2 жыл бұрын
impossible: the gothaer waggonfabrik is gone.
@zy87192 жыл бұрын
Why would they?
@Irobert1115HD2 жыл бұрын
@@zy8719 do you mean my comment or the comment from druide?
@DruideRC2 жыл бұрын
@@zy8719 to prouve the effeciency of the design, that German engineers have succeeded in the first stealth model in history in a flying wing with double reactor. in fact its for science and memory
@FrugalBuilding Жыл бұрын
The Dyke Delta is a 4 place flying wing that has been around since 1962. It is by far the most stable aircraft that I have ever flown!
@nevillecreativitymentor22 күн бұрын
❤❤❤❤❤❤ I have a dream ...of building a DD and its good to know that your experience says it's the most stable. That is extremely reassuring.
@LeeTaylorpilot3 жыл бұрын
GORGEOUS! Why not? Same reason as almost any pusher. Debris kicked up by the tires into the prop.
@tomthompson7400Ай бұрын
still looks fresh and sleek.
@bryanewyatt11 ай бұрын
Pretty neat looking little bird!
@myperspective50915 жыл бұрын
It's nice that you guys finished up your airplane Its good to see it flying 👍☺👍
@hortenaircraftgmbh20195 жыл бұрын
thank you.
@TheFroztv5 жыл бұрын
I'm in love with the design ! Looks like a personnal B-2 !
@hortenaircraftgmbh20195 жыл бұрын
Thank you.
@stupidumbasshithead57152 жыл бұрын
@@hortenaircraftgmbh2019 pls continue the HO 229
@lsx0012 жыл бұрын
Yes, even cooler would be a personal HO-229.
@ericoschmitt4 жыл бұрын
SHUT UP AND TAKE MY MONEY! wait, i got no money...
@solidaridadjusticia1438 Жыл бұрын
I might be getting this wrong but your company name is Horton reminiscent of the Horton brothers that made the ho-229 the first jet powered flying wing amd a very stable flying Wing at that
@MililaniJag5 жыл бұрын
Love flying wings. Looks like a lot of oscillation. Met Chuck Yeager and asked him about the Northrop YB-35/YB-49. He said it wasnt stable enough to be a bomber due to oscillation. Also got to see the Northrop N-9M. Good luck Horten!!
@dand5795 жыл бұрын
It is interesting that some pilots reported that the YB-35/YB-49 was acceptably stable, some did not, and that Northrop's flying wing was initially was awarded the contract, which was then cancelled under questionable circumstances. Any instability could have been overcome by control systems available at that time. For reference, see what it took to augment the stability of the B-58 Hustler in the late 50's. Those that disliked the flying wing seemed to have an agenda to support the competing B-36. I've talked to old SAC pilots who said that the B-36 was horrible - it's only advantage over the B-29 was range and payload, that it was painfully slow, not much faster than a B-29, and very unreliable. "Six turning and four burning" turned into "two turning, two burning, two joking, two smoking, and two unaccounted for!" Regardless, the fact that the B-21 is replacing the B-52 is vindication of the flying wing and casts a further shadow over the initial cancelling of the YB-35/YB-49. I'd love to see a reference for Yeager's comments, if you have one. As far as I know, he never flew a YB-35 or YB-49. kzbin.info/www/bejne/i5rCoGVrbKmNe5I
@MililaniJag5 жыл бұрын
@@dand579 Ironic the last Northrop Flying Wing (N-9M) just crashed. No reference of Gen.Yeagers comments. I met him on a commercial flt from PHL to ORD in '83. He flew Glamorous Glennis (or Bob Hoovers P-51?) to PHL to promote The Right Stuff and was returning home. I had just bought a book on the Northrop YB-35/YB-49. Asked him about the conspiracy. He said that the tech of the time wasnt able to stabilize the YB-35. I was reading The Right Stuff and he autographed it for me. A very nice guy. Dont think anybody else knew who he was. Thx
@dand5795 жыл бұрын
@@MililaniJag You are very lucky to have had quality time with Chuck Yeager. I've only seen and heard him speak from a distance at the Oshkosh airshow many years ago. The loss of the N-9M and the pilot is truly a tragedy. It was little more than an early prototype and flying museum, but hopefully the investigation will yield something that increases safety going forward. Many flying derivative examples of Northrop's flying wing live on in the Mitchell B-10 ultralight motor glider. Early versions without the winglet rudders had stability problems. I am very curious to learn about the flying properties of this Horten HX-2, and if it will ever be more than a science project.
@MililaniJag5 жыл бұрын
@@dand579 I got to see the N-9M and talk to the pilot about 10 years ago at the Palm Springs Air Museum. At the time I was based in HNL and the N-9M pilot was interested in Hawaii and I was interested in the N-9M.
@hortenaircraftgmbh20195 жыл бұрын
@@dand579 You can find properties of the HX-2 on HORTEN® website www.horten-aircraft.com. More details will be published in due course. You are welcome to visit our Fly-In on May 18 at Eisenach Airfield EDGE with several flight demonstrations of the HX-2 during the day. There you will see its more than a science project :)-
@pheenix425 жыл бұрын
Most beautiful. I hope Reimar and Walter got to see this.
@hortenaircraftgmbh20195 жыл бұрын
Unfortunately not, but initial prototypes they did.
@pheenix425 жыл бұрын
Imagine that! Ranks up there with Jack Northrop being shown a model of the B-2 Spirit stealth aircraft before his passing.
@ritaheinen41245 жыл бұрын
Very nice plane designed by Hans M Heinen. 👍
@utubeaccess73 жыл бұрын
I have always loved and studied flying wings, but why do most require up-elevon trim when flying level? To me, it indicates a huge drag loss. Proper flying wing airfoils have reflex built in to counter the forward-pitching tendencies of lift. However, in all of these photos, the elevons are pitched up considerably (negating the efficiency gains of a flying wing). Is this due to a conservatively forward CG? How do you mechanically provide exponential control inputs to counter the flying wing's inherent pitch instability?
@redlioness66272 жыл бұрын
in the early 1990's Benetton put out cars such as their 1993 Benetton B193 which was totally unstable and as a result the most unsafe car on the F1 grid, to offset the flaws it was computer assisted like a fly by wire system where the car was fitted with multiple sensors that relayed their data to the computerised system and the system would programme the car to make corrections with immediate effect and so assisting the driver to race better, such a system built onboard such a flying wing would effectively make immediate automatic corrections throughout the flight and so providing the flying wing with such a reflex system as you have mentioned.
@EngineeringFun2 жыл бұрын
They are beautiful, yet extremely twitchy and unsafe. For a fixed center of gravity machine (some drones), they are OK, but when you have any kind of variable load, missing the ideal center of gravity might mean disaster. And indeed, a good reflex airfoil has about half the glide ratio of a regular airfoil. Separating the wing and the stabilizer drastically improve efficiency. There is a reason everyone tried the concept and eventually dumped it.
@gee_bee-zn9tz3 жыл бұрын
So schön kann ein Flugzeug sein.
@arnaldoleon15 ай бұрын
Cool aircraft but why the need for winglets? Are you now using a bell-shaped lift distibution?
@qzorn44402 жыл бұрын
sweet idea.. now combine it with the car for a cool air/road trip 😍 thanks
@doughoffman94636 ай бұрын
Are those "rudders" I see on the trailing edges of the "winglets/vertical stabilizers"?
@mro94664 жыл бұрын
great design
@basbeek81494 жыл бұрын
Beautifull aircraft! Love its appearance!
@yves35604 жыл бұрын
Flying wings are okay, we know that. All that was missing in today´s flying wings is style. Up to now, it´s here, congratulations.
@powerhousepaperairplanesrogers3 жыл бұрын
You guys love flyingwings
@engineerernest5 ай бұрын
Tell me about stall / spin... Is this a factor in this type of aircraft? If so, can you recover?
@the23rdradiotower412 жыл бұрын
Anyway we can find out more about this?
@clockworkpotato3 жыл бұрын
Very interesting! Guys, what is your current project status? I wish you luck and patience to make it a commercial product.
@davidmick92093 жыл бұрын
Beautiful!
@samvance65712 жыл бұрын
Ooooooh, I want one!
@kolbola4 жыл бұрын
This is the one and only aerodynamic arrangement which will be able to solve all kind of challenges of the motor glider world. Big wing, huge, low aspect ratio for the best glide quality, compact design for high aerodynamic loads, easy to arrange the canopy-engine-propeller trio in the structure. What I would modify (ok, quite big worlds from an amateur) is to move forward slightly the complete canopy section for a better field view, add a minor LERX at the root, improve the lifting body character of the center section, elongate backward the engine compartment (or the gearbox/shaft at least) for a better shape coefficient and use a co-axial 4+4 blade propeller for a neutral propeller momentum, reduced precession and improved propulsion efficiency. That would be a very nice aircraft! :)
@GodzillaGoesGaga3 жыл бұрын
Cameras can be added easily. Cockpit can have glass to show outside views. COG and profile are very important from my understanding.
@rogerpha139810 ай бұрын
Since this is all wing, can I type glass this as a self launch powered glider?
@FrugalBuilding Жыл бұрын
It would be nice if their website were in ENGLISH.
@mcduck53 жыл бұрын
Any progress on devalopment? Thanks!
@PorscheGTRSWeissach5 жыл бұрын
Geil! Find ich Klasse, das wieder ein original Horten Nurflügler fliegt! Wurde auch Zeit! Noch Geiler wäre allerdings ein 2-Strahliger Nurflügler! Das würde dem Ganzen noch die Krone aufsetzen!
@PorscheGTRSWeissach5 жыл бұрын
Ist es soo schwer eine moderne Version der Ho-9 zu bauen? Die Leute wollen bestimmt auch eine Ho-9 sehen! Heutige Mini-Triebwerke wären ja viel zuverlässiger als damalige... Es geht ja auch nur um die Optik und auch darum zu zeigen, das eine Ho-9 flugtauglich is! Mit heutiger Technik dürfte das doch kein Problem sein oder?
@philippbock34444 жыл бұрын
@@PorscheGTRSWeissach Die sind dabei, eine Jet-Variante, einen unbemannten Typ sowie einen Senkrechtstarter zu planen.
@armonrakhman37912 жыл бұрын
German technology! Awesome
@microtheguyfromearth10 ай бұрын
Horten really likes flying wings, huh
@FatGuyFliesRC4 жыл бұрын
Just to cool!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
@lokesh3031012 жыл бұрын
Love it.
@jamestunedflat8942 Жыл бұрын
Since I noticed that Horten was responding to the comments, I've had an idea for propulsion that's been rolling around in my mind for about a week now. I was thinking about a ducted fan hybrid system based on a turbo prop turbine spinning an electric generator and running the exhaust through the duct behind a set of electric motors powering the fan blades. This setup would work especially well with a flying/blended wing design. Having a small battery pack would allow more power for take off than the generator can provide on its own, and the exhaust would also provide additional thrust that would be wasted using a standard turboprop design. How would one go about starting a project like this? I'm a truck driver so I don't exactly have a lot of free time or savings to build a prototype.
@cease_requiem60342 жыл бұрын
i remember back when this company was building high altitude bombers and fighter jets
@muzkat1014 ай бұрын
I feel that someone like Burt Rutan and Horten should partner up to make a full-size but private size, 6 passenger Lifting Body Flying Wing Pusher similar to the Celera 500L, but with a full body blended wing design, maybe as a semi-delta wing configuration. A design similar to but scaled down in size to that of JetZero, however, built with a fuller blended wing design.
@bkzlab2 жыл бұрын
How much will this plane cost? I want it
@abcabc-yy6vn Жыл бұрын
полохой обзор с места пилота в бок !
@DANTHETUBEMAN3 жыл бұрын
Will you be building a electric plane?
@drantonytoben88103 жыл бұрын
PUL9/PUL10 = Why is Siegfried Panek not mentioned? Panek Ultra Light - Bernhard, you remember me from Australia?! Give Siegfried some credit re his visit to Reimar Horten in Argentina!
@thomasleemullins43724 жыл бұрын
I think that is cool.
@davidgrainger59942 жыл бұрын
When will they be available and what is your projected price point?
@wckoek2 жыл бұрын
I am surprised that you guys use side by side seating, I very much prefer this kind of arrangement but it is not optimum for pusher configuration due to airflow goes over fuselage before going to the props, the props have to be larger than the diameter of fuselage. If the prop is too close to the wing, air flow is vastly different top and bottom of the wing. Engine cooling also an issue. But would be very interested how you guys counter this problem, not many people manage to make such a dream on paper come true.
@digitalranger42594 жыл бұрын
Such an interesting aircraft! Will there be an LSA version? When will it be shown in the U.S.?
@anim8ted9235 жыл бұрын
Beautiful aircraft. No performance specifications on their website.
@hortenaircraftgmbh20195 жыл бұрын
Dear Kevin. The current specifications are indeed on our website- www.horten-aircraft.com/
@Flybrei4 жыл бұрын
Sehr schön 👍
@marc_frank3 жыл бұрын
aber nicht so schön wie deiner 😂
@savagecub5 жыл бұрын
How about putting two small jet engines (like on the Sub-Sonex) into the wings ?
@mariosantisoferreiros22384 жыл бұрын
Was thinking the same, mini ho 229
@antonblebann68235 жыл бұрын
Die originalen Horten Entwürfe kamen ohne SLWK, Winglets, Tiplets.....aus, trotzdem, schön anzusehen 👍🏻
@glennstubbs82324 ай бұрын
Five years later. What went wrong?
@sumanm87414 жыл бұрын
Well that's a beauty! Please share the build plan 😉
@aaroncm545 Жыл бұрын
i think i need it.
@lukoil49664 жыл бұрын
What is the base price?
@GreasyBelcher4 жыл бұрын
Base price? Are you sure you don’t want the sports model?
@il_vendicatore5 жыл бұрын
this is cool
@henriksegercrantz3625 жыл бұрын
I want one! (I already have a Rotax engine! ...on my Funduro..so just a little power boosting ...and wings missing.:)
@yves35604 жыл бұрын
To work ! ;)
@derikafriedrich93065 жыл бұрын
What happened with the bsld wing twist? This design looks more conventional compared to the PUL10.
@hortenaircraftgmbh20195 жыл бұрын
We are very proud of our achievements in having proved that the HX-2 delivers on what has been calculated and expected.
@EddyJean-claude6 күн бұрын
So i guess now every new plane has to look like a stealth bomber. The SEMA society of aviation.
@demej002 жыл бұрын
Beautiful flying wing. I fly rc flying wings cause I can't afford to fly a real one.
@EngineeringFun2 жыл бұрын
They are beautiful, yet extremely twitchy and unsafe. For a fixed center of gravity machine (some drones), they are OK, but when you have any kind of variable load, missing the ideal center of gravity might mean disaster. And indeed, a good reflex airfoil has about half the glide ratio of a regular airfoil. Separating the wing and the stabilizer drastically improve efficiency. There is a reason everyone tried the concept and eventually dumped it.
@nor_cal_trailrides99904 жыл бұрын
it's awesome, but it looks expensive :(
@martinschubert81155 жыл бұрын
Hallo, ein sehr stimmungsvolles Werbevideo. Viel Erfolg mit der HX-2. Vielleicht können wir einmal miteinander reden. Freundliche Grüße vom "Luftpostillon"
@bullshitter9054 жыл бұрын
crazy that dr horten was in argentina, wonder why. But cool airplane tho
@kek2074 жыл бұрын
because he was engineering the flying wing for the NAyis and had to escape
@MonostripeZebra5 жыл бұрын
Interessant.. wie schauts aus mit der Nickstabilität?
@hortenaircraftgmbh20195 жыл бұрын
We are very proud of our achievements in having proved that the HX-2 delivers on what has been calculated and expected.
@mariog92022 жыл бұрын
who were you working for in 1945? asking for a friend
@ericoschmitt4 жыл бұрын
I really wish I could have a prone pilot flying wing glider with high aspect ratio. I fly hang glider, maybe one day I can have an ATOS+mosquito, but beyond that I dream of a prone pilot glider for high efficiency thanks to smaller fuselage. I might build my own one day, who knows. The old Horten designs are really cool, but can be made better.
@Depresdude4 ай бұрын
A friendly ho-229
@adrianhsieh42765 жыл бұрын
If the price can be kept below €200K this will totally dominate the market.
@hortenaircraftgmbh20195 жыл бұрын
We hope to announce very attractive standard pricing very shortly. Visit our website www.horten-aircraft.com for further information.
@meocutduoi1235 жыл бұрын
Horten HO-2?
@jebise11265 жыл бұрын
so who of the original horten brothers designed this?
@hortenaircraftgmbh20195 жыл бұрын
Some of the original designs were inspired by Dr. Ing. Reimar Horten (1915-1994)
@jebise11265 жыл бұрын
@@hortenaircraftgmbh2019 so you mostly took the name?
@hortenaircraftgmbh20195 жыл бұрын
The early prototypes were in fact designed by Dr. Ing. Reimar Horten. The PUL 9 Flying Wing was created from Dr. Horten's calculations and it proved the concept. On Wikipedia, you can find more information here: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horten_HX-2
@ar1hk4 жыл бұрын
Ww2 secret plane concept
@WindThrusters3 жыл бұрын
Pilot can't see anything below.
@KlingbergWingMkII5 жыл бұрын
Pretty flying wing; nice styling. However the flight footage exposes some potential issues. There is a slight wobble entering, during, and exiting turns. This could be a small amount of dutch roll due to the dihedral (which is increased by the tall winglets) causing a coupling of the equations of motion for roll and yaw. This could be annoying to a pilot over time. This issue can be resolved by removing all dihedral or having a small amount of anhedral. The result will be more tendency to have spiral divergence, but the period of that motion will be long enough for the pilot to correct easily. Also, there appears to be a "pecking" motion in pitch which is common to many flying wings (for example the SB-13). This is due to the flat nature of the pitching moment curve near trim. This issue can be resolved by moving mass (pilot, engine, etc) to below the wing. Probably not possible at this stage of development so an electronic pitch stabilization might be in order. There also appears to be a lot of elevator needed in turns. This is typical of flying wings due to the short moment arm. These large deflections cause a lot of spanwise flow which can promote spins. It appears this design is attempting to prevent this problem with a large wing fence. Perhaps it is working, but care must be taken when testing aft CG locations. Elevons that have a planform where their chord is larger at the tip compared to the root can greatly reduce this issue. I hope this aircraft has a spin recovery chute. With proper sizing and placement of inboard flaps, they can be deployed downward to create a nose up pitching moment. If this approach is used, then the inboard flaps can be used to provide the pitch trim required in turns and the downward deflection of the flaps will actually reduce the spanwise flow. Perhaps the wing fences could be eliminated this way and reduce drag. This wing is beautiful and I hope it is also safe. Please test fly it with great care as you expand the flight envelope.
@hortenaircraftgmbh20195 жыл бұрын
Thank you for your comments which are most interesting. We are delighted to have designed and manufactured the HX-2 to become a highly stable aircraft following extensive computer simulation and a great many number of flight tests over a 20 year period working with some of the very best experts in aeronautical design. Anyone is highly welcome to visit our Fly-In on May 18 at Eisenach Airfield EDGE with several flight demonstrations of the HX-2 during the day. Thereafter, there are regular flight demonstrations ongoing. Please contact HORTEN® website www.horten-aircraft.com for more information.
@JPF1235 жыл бұрын
@@hortenaircraftgmbh2019 Are you IMPLYING commentators on KZbin don't know more about aircraft design than the entire Horton design team?! Pfft the gall. You might as well gift ME one of your new HX-2s! Certainly, I'll tell you all about the the flaws and wonders of your design.
@hortenaircraftgmbh20195 жыл бұрын
atter0 are you interested to purchase?😉
@KlingbergWingMkII5 жыл бұрын
@@hortenaircraftgmbh2019 Actually, I have 40 years’ experience designing and building flying wings, full scale and models. I have a MS degree in aeronautical engineering and I have worked in the aerospace industry for more than 35 years. I am a pilot rated in all types and I test fly my own aircraft. Your design shows many of the classic issues with flying wings and those issues can result in nasty crashes. The dihedral you set combined with the winglet config is causing coupling of the yaw and roll equations of motion. The large wing fences indicated that you are dealing with significant spanwise flow and that is being aggravated by the wing taper and the design of the elevons. In addition, I’d guess that you are using laminar airfoil(s) and on flying wings they become a problem because they significantly reduce yaw damping. Bottom line, I beg you to be extremely careful when doing slow flight turns, especially when you are testing the aft CG location. You could very easily experience tip stall at a much lower angle of attack than expected. The explanation of why this happens is too complex to cover here. The bottom line is that you could easily end up in a flat spin without any warning from the aircraft and those spins can be unrecoverable when the CG is at its aft limit. I see your wing doing things in flight that could result in loss of the aircraft or, heaven forbid, loss of life. Fair Warning!
@mcduck53 жыл бұрын
@@KlingbergWingMkII What? Somebody in the comments section that knows what they are talking about??? What's the world coming too?
@DustyCowdog5 жыл бұрын
Let the University of KZbin Aeronautical engineers begin their analysis..... I think she's beautiful.
@electricaviationchannelvid78633 жыл бұрын
I heard that due to the WWII Germany was forbidden by the USA to develop flying wing / flying body designs...meanwhile Boeing and Lockheed pushed out multiple military aircraft using this advantage....
@peterson70823 жыл бұрын
Not really
@danielmolinar866911 ай бұрын
No. Even if so, it wouldn’t matter as the designs for future US flying wings was based on Jack Northrop’s designs.
@powerhousepaperairplanesrogers3 жыл бұрын
Hello
@csoehlig5 жыл бұрын
Ich will eins kaufen
@hortenaircraftgmbh20195 жыл бұрын
We hope to announce very attractive standard pricing very shortly. Visit our website www.horten-aircraft.com for further information.
@csoehlig5 жыл бұрын
@@hortenaircraftgmbh2019 Klasse!
@SusanTroglan5 ай бұрын
That extreme seat placement to the rear will make ensure this never succeeds.
@SouthernHerdsman4 жыл бұрын
Flying wings are much more agile than traditional 'boomers'.
@rickbrown035 жыл бұрын
Would be nice to see a 6-seater one day.
@hortenaircraftgmbh20195 жыл бұрын
We hope so too.
@ericoschmitt4 жыл бұрын
Have you heard about Koen Van de Kerckhove’s project inspired on the Horten HXc? Prone pilot and all. Unfortunately unfinished, but looks absolutely amazing. You should have a chat with that man. Here’s the link: www.nestofdragons.net/weird-airplanes/flying-wings/special-horten-flying-wings/dragonwing/
@paulomesquita77354 жыл бұрын
Show...
@mrgreyman3358 Жыл бұрын
without appearing to be a karen or anything, isn't that more in line with a blended wing body aircraft?
@rcman4.2flyboy3 жыл бұрын
Beautiful flying wing aircraft but to much money for the real one but at least I have my own remote control flying wing
@gotzvonberlichingen10423 жыл бұрын
Clevere Idee die Seitenruder in den winglets zu verbauen. Ich hab mich jahrelang gefragt, warum noch niemand daran gedacht hat dieses Konzept weiter zu verfolgen.......
@williammann90073 жыл бұрын
The only airplane I truly want.
@620ironwolf2 жыл бұрын
Love the aircraft. But y'all still haven't figured it out? Get help from us RC scratch builder guys lol.
@johndalman66165 жыл бұрын
Looks like downward visibility is terrible. Beautiful plane but it would not be much fun to fly and not see the sights.
@hortenaircraftgmbh20195 жыл бұрын
You can see this is not the case by looking at our other video which shows scenes from within the cockpit: kzbin.info/www/bejne/pWO9Z4WGqqlrhpY
@Raven3one3 ай бұрын
dont stall in that
@EamonnSeoigh4 жыл бұрын
I really believe in this design. I didn’t see any reference to V numbers. Interested in xcountry capability: cruise speeds and range with the rotax. Ich werde auf Updates und andere zukünftige Angebote achten. Gute Arbeit!
@miraclepie17204 жыл бұрын
How do you feel dudes - you just reinvented a hang glider.
@powerhousepaperairplanesrogers3 жыл бұрын
Channel
@henriksegercrantz3625 жыл бұрын
I can see you must have got inspired from this: kzbin.info/www/bejne/eqrJc6uEiqqSirc hahaa! But I have to admit I got my inspiration from the Horten nurflugel!