This is easily one of the most facinating and beautiful planes ever built.
@oldieschoolerentrolzАй бұрын
Did you know these things were made by obese fascists sucking hitlers toes while doing a Roman salute
@poyopoyo213Ай бұрын
Agreed. I can never get enough of looking at it.
@wilburfinnigan2142Ай бұрын
Only one flew and it crashed and killed the pilot.
@achdumeinegueteАй бұрын
@@wilburfinnigan2142 I remember something similar. But I recently also found footage from sowjet onboard camera capturing one being shot down over Berlin. It was wingman while the single Horten chased the other sowjet.
@bowl-of-chicken-soup7107Ай бұрын
@@achdumeinegueteit’s fake footage. It’s from a video game with a filter over it making it seem like it was caught on a camera.
@ELECTRICMOTOCROSSMACHINEАй бұрын
The best HO 229 documentary i've seen yet.
@JustanotherconsumerАй бұрын
Still gives the absolutely false impression that it was unprecedented or amazing. It was unusual, to be sure, but flying wings had been around since the days of gliders and, like the Ho-229, had control problems and poor safety records.
@ELECTRICMOTOCROSSMACHINEАй бұрын
@@Justanotherconsumer It was the craziest jet fighter of it's time, still is. It smoked all comers. The pilot wore a pressurized space suit, with a solid glass helmet. The first plane and it's pilot were killed when one of the engines quit on landing. By then the war was over, it never saw action. You clearly know nothing about this plane. A jet fighter is clearly different from a glider concept.
@KCrucisАй бұрын
@@Justanotherconsumer the only accident it had was due to an engine failure, tf are you talking about?
@mauboncall20 күн бұрын
HORTEN = TRASH
@mihovildanicic5305Ай бұрын
This is how videos should be made in 2024: AMAZING modeling, great sound, multiple languages, subtitles, short and sweet; all the info you need and nothing you don't. GREAT WORK! Happy to subscribe!
@wilburfinnigan2142Ай бұрын
BUT they have to be on true facts not just speculation and "estimates "!!!!
@Gravity_studiossАй бұрын
@@wilburfinnigan2142 How do you make a video about an obscure, unfinished prototype aircraft without speculations and estimates?
@jamesatkinson8607Ай бұрын
"Best I can do is stolen art assets and an AI narrator" -Average KZbin content creator
@JustanotherconsumerАй бұрын
@@Gravity_studiossbecause they give the impression that it was a great plane just waiting to happen when it was a failure that crashed - no one did flying wings after the war but Northrop (and they didn’t get very far) for a reason. The StG-44 inspired a generation of rifles. The Ho229 was left in the garbage where it belonged.
@victorschoung489Ай бұрын
Por eso les hicieron la guerra, porque tenían un gran desarrollo que ni los ingleses y gringos podían competir con ellos.
@grippingyarnsukАй бұрын
I’m not sure if I am more impressed by the aircraft or the superb quality of the graphics and research that went into making this video .
@cyberdemon651717 күн бұрын
the b2 spirit before the b2 spirit
@WrathlonАй бұрын
This thing looks futuristic even now. Imagine being in WWII and seeing this thing flying around - the psychological effect of how futuristic it was would be significant.
@Arsenic7110 күн бұрын
Especially at that speed...
@savvasgamingchannel50627 күн бұрын
It was kept a secret for many years after the war.
@7x7.2752 күн бұрын
@@savvasgamingchannel5062That is most likely because it took the allies that long to reverse engineer this master piece and figure out how the Germans made such an advanced aircraft .
@diegomarconi524Ай бұрын
One of the most beautiful and futuristic plane of WW2
@Battlemode-l9pАй бұрын
For real
@atomic_bombaАй бұрын
It STILL looks futuristic. Funny how that works.
@arkadiuszk92Ай бұрын
expensive prototype xd
@meltdown6165Ай бұрын
And would have been hard to pick out on the radar of the day.
@michiko4017Ай бұрын
@@meltdown6165before anyone says this, Lockheed tested the Horton and was hard to pick up on radar, but NOT 100% stealth.
@qrrjrmАй бұрын
Your 3D models are getting even better! We may have another mustard on our hands.
@reckitboo8792Ай бұрын
No joke, I got a video from Mustard in my recommended after watching this.
@D9fjgАй бұрын
PUT ON YOUR MASKS!
@PlaylostАй бұрын
@@reckitboo8792 same, 2 of them
@maximilianduehr3450Ай бұрын
You should definitely check out Animagraffs
@joemontano71Ай бұрын
A comparison to Mustard videos - that’s high marks!
@theverseshedАй бұрын
This and the Me262 were surely the most beautiful-looking German fighters that emerged from WW2. An excellent video. Many thanks for the time taken to produce it.
@wilburfinnigan2142Ай бұрын
BUT..... the Germans still lost the war !!!!!!
@jkmutendar8820Ай бұрын
@@wilburfinnigan2142 So what. The planes were still absolutely awesome!
@MrJohnnysevenАй бұрын
Arado 234 lovely
@williestyle35Ай бұрын
Yep. The Arado 234 "Blitz" is a lovely if more conventional design. It is on display at the Smithsonian Institution's National Air and Space Museum - Steven F Udvar - Hazy Center.
@dom3827Ай бұрын
@@wilburfinnigan2142 yea, giving all other world forces a hard time, making them struggle. Insane for such a small country with so few people. Easily the strongest country the world has ever seen. They could have won every war 1 on 1 vs every nation what so ever for its time very easily. Remember, it took ALL world forces TOGETHER for a tiny country.
@dylanleboff43954 күн бұрын
As someone who loves to learn & read about aircraft I’ve always been fascinated in a sense by the HO 229 & hats of to you this is the easiest to follow & best graphics I’ve seen on the subject, will check out the rest of your channel. Thanks for the effort man
@berttheaceАй бұрын
This is an EXCELLENT Virtual - Reality - Presentation of the Horten 229 , thank you for sharing it at YT ! My father always told me, when I was a kid : '' WAR IS THE INVENTOR OF ALL THINGS '', and if you reflekt our history, he was right. This Ho 229 was the most advanced Fighter - Airplane of WWII and for CENTURIES in the FUTURE. THIS DESIGN IS MODERN STILL TODAY. Respect to the Horten - Brothers !
@Arsenic7110 күн бұрын
Actually war is not a prerequisite for research advancement - in fact it's quite a hindrance. Just imagine if the US$ 2 billion (PER DAY) that is currently being spent on the military alone in the USA were allocated to NASA or fundamental research institutions. We'd live on Mars, have cheap nuclear fusion energy, supersonic passenger transport and so much more. The only reason we DON'T have that is war. Instead of centuries you mean decades... ;-)
@Adrian-AvilaАй бұрын
I cannot believe that I am able to get access to this kind of content for free... thank you for your hard work!!
@隅谷利彦Ай бұрын
さ
@dom3827Ай бұрын
it is not free. You pay with view time and watching ads.
@jakejake892113 күн бұрын
@@dom3827okay
@quadroxd5196Ай бұрын
Bro i wish every engineering themed video on KZbin would be as detailed and well made as your Videos.
SALUDOS AL GRAN PUEBLO DEL JAPON. UDS. TAMBIEN TIENEN COSAS QUE CONTAR COMO ESTAS.
@はもきАй бұрын
ホルテン 運用が複雑すぎる。
@UthandolАй бұрын
@@はもき But yet somehow they flew them. High skill perhaps?
@studlydudly29 күн бұрын
For me this is the most Beautiful Aircraft ever built.
@hruthgardahne822Ай бұрын
Incredible detail, rarely we see documentations that are this good! Thank you to everyone involved! Greetings from germany.
@Flammenwerfer1935Ай бұрын
You made one mistake: The video ended! This is the first video really going into my favorite plane that no one ever talks about. Great vid, keep it up!
@IncompetentJonesАй бұрын
wow the quality of this video is incredible!
@ThePerfectRedАй бұрын
This is an incredible 3D modelling and rendering. You must have spent hundreds of hours, this is just so amazing!
@richardminhleАй бұрын
Rendering was done in Unreal Engine so it is practically a few mins to render.
@andrachambers4234Ай бұрын
Brain warping effort indeed!
@melonshop8888Ай бұрын
🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆 🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆 🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆 🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆 🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆 I LIKE IT TOO. 👍😜
@discoverlightАй бұрын
Man the level of details and quality of these videos is top notch. Hadn’t heard of this plane before.
@anthonylevan4637Ай бұрын
So lucky to have visited the Silver Hill facility and photographed this amazing aircraft.
@sandgrownun66Ай бұрын
Amazing but that's all. Just a mock-up.
@PawheadshotАй бұрын
Thanks for the video David. It's always nice to see in-depth modeling of the different machines you cover. I have noticed a few errors or oversights regarding the drag rudders and spoiler. According to the Royal Aircraft Establishment's report No. F.A. 259/1 the outboard spoilers were part of the drag rudder system, fully deploying before the inboard ones as the pilot pressed one of the rudder pedals independently. To add further info about this, the report also states that both pedals could be pressed silmutaneously to use the drag rudders as spoilers proper and increase longitudinal stability. As for armament "Monogram Close-Up n°12" states that there were two planned fighter loads, either 2xMK103 with 140 rds. per gun or 4xMK108 with 90 rds. per gun and a short barrel, although the book "Spirit of Thunringia" states the same MK108 load and 170 rds. per gun for the MK103. The instrument panel could have used a bit more details since there are quite a lot of period and recent photos showing it in several books. For example, the radio indicator at 11:15 was in fact an AFN2 blind landing instrument which also doubled as a radio navigation instrument but the one depicted in the video lacks its altitude gauge, and the tachometers lack the dual RPM scale. Some of the updated textures could be used for future videos on other german aircrafts.
@OliverInc.Ай бұрын
Quite the in depth and thought out comment! Im sure that the team will appreciate your constructive criticism and I hope you have a fantastic day!
@和足蓮見11 күн бұрын
Thanks a lot` before Paris ending flight of me Goー229 1970
@jeffreyhagelin36729 күн бұрын
Those missing instruments might have been taken by Allied souvenir hunters. Also, by that late stage in the war, aircraft parts were often pirated off of crashed aircraft. I believe the Horten 9 nose gear ,once belonged to a bomber.
@echopapacharlieАй бұрын
Your 3D modeling of WW2 machines is amazing
@JimseracАй бұрын
I have watched many of the numerous videos about this remarkable aircraft and there is no doubt in my mind that this is the best, most detailed and most visually stunning of them all. The integration of the commentary with beautiful computer graphics, 3d visuals of the plane in flight, the explanation of the unusual control surfaces and fascinating exploded views of the craft showing the cleverness, simplicity and resourcefulness of the design all contribute to a perfect viewing experience. Liked and subscribed.
@ghixref478110 күн бұрын
The ho-229 truely is a wonder of technology, its shape is the one that goes best and was also a jet. German engineering really did push itself to its limits!
@American_JeeperАй бұрын
Absolutely incredible video. Every once in a while KZbin gets its suggestions right. Liked and subscribed.
@pinochioo5678Ай бұрын
mom wake up blue paw released a new video
@JayKumar-mr2ohАй бұрын
Mom? It's babe right?
@jeremybear573Ай бұрын
My brother literally did this to me 2 days ago!
@t.b.5115Ай бұрын
You sleep in the same bed a your mom?
@nicktozie6685Ай бұрын
🌭
@fredwild190Ай бұрын
The question is how higher speed gave the Horten an advantage against allied bombers. A quicker engagement reduced the Horten's time under fire, but it also reduced the pilot's time to target a bomber. Time for new tactics. Beautiful video. Thank you.
@juslitorАй бұрын
Considering the numerical superiority the horten would have gone up against, speed would definitely have been an advantage.
@ragnar704Ай бұрын
That's why it carried a pair of 30mm autocannons: it could dump a lot of heavy, destructive rounds in just a burst of fire. The Me262 carried four MK108s, so I would imagine they would have up-armed the Go229 to at least four had it actually seen combat.
@Axel_AndersenАй бұрын
If we look at the history of any/most successful WW2 (or WW1 for that matter) we will see that it is a process of continuous improvement that finally produces a truly effective and successful war machine. I expect the Horten would have followed a similar path. The first few generations would not have been that great and effective. And at the same time the enemy would have developed their machinery to counter the new threat or come up with new strategies to nullify the assumed advantages. So all these words in this and similar videos about how something could have affected or changed the course of a war are a bit of a hype.
@sandgrownun66Ай бұрын
From reading what you write. Anybody would think that this thing actually flew. It never got past the mock up stage, and would have been unflyable anyway.
@maultasche668Ай бұрын
It did fly several times@@sandgrownun66
@SR-dq1ecАй бұрын
非常に詳細な、かつ高品質な解説を有難うございます。ホルテンの解説だけでなく、全翼機の実用化何故が難しいのかまで非常に良く解かりました。 Thank you very much for the very detailed and high quality commentary. Not only did you explain the Horten, but I also understood very well why it was difficult to put a flying wing into practical use.
@CJB-ln8eb6 күн бұрын
You should do a video on the A10 warthog
@gargara77Ай бұрын
A design and technology far ahead of its time, truly a masterpiece
@KaiBrunk125Ай бұрын
Thank you, David. Passionate work as always
@-sturmfalke-Ай бұрын
My favourite airplane design. While it wasn't that effective, it looked so cool, maybe it was designed with the old engineering methods, but still looks so futuristic.
@3KiwianaАй бұрын
The only reason it wasn’t effective is because the axis forces were outnumbered more than 20 to 1 combined with the fact that Germany couldn’t get the resources required.
@Nyx_2142Ай бұрын
@@3Kiwiana This aircraft was a pipe dream for the Germans and would have gone nowhere. Like the rest of their "wunderwaffe", It would have changed nothing. There are many reasons aircraft of this design went functionally nowhere for half a century beyond that point.
@3KiwianaАй бұрын
@@Nyx_2142 never heard of so much tripe, just check project paper lip, the Americans wanted got and used all Germanys technology including the jet fighter, obviously like anything new it got improved on
@Guido_XLАй бұрын
@@Nyx_2142 The idea was to make the Allied populations weary of the war, offering Germany a (slim) chance for a separate peace with the West. The Germans held no illusions about these weapons allegedly being able to turn the tide from a merely militaristic perspective. Resources were simply too slim to even begin to approach such an endeavour. From German perspective, the entire WWII was never meant to be waged for an extended period of time, as it was obvious that resources wouldn't last long enough. This was also the reason for their hesitation to allow for such a war in general, in contrast to the popularised myth that they allegedly drove for war in the 1930's.
@tandemcharge5114Ай бұрын
@@3Kiwiana>Tripe >Responds with even more tripe You're an absolute clown
Excellent animation, and reconstruction of the Horten : )
@ToniJovic814 күн бұрын
Pure art.
@TOMCATnbrАй бұрын
Having it in french is a nice touch, and your french is perfect ! Thank you for those amazing video.
@jaumetdepalma5347Ай бұрын
your spanish language is quite good too ! regards from Mallorca, Spain
@Alex--ARTАй бұрын
This is a fucking IA voice !! And a lot of word is not correctly translated. 'Horten' pronunciation is incorrect. Around 13:00 the "bouton d'amorçage" is wrong (correct word for engine starter is 'démarreur') and "tachymetre" pronunciation is "taKymetre" Stop using IA for everything !! Ask to real people for this !!
@agentomatАй бұрын
A german audiotrack would be nice for a german plane.
@Daronor01Ай бұрын
I would love to see something similar but as topic the Heinkel He-162 A2. It´s such a unique and fascinating design that was used in the last weeks of the war! Wolfgang Wollenweber even wrote a book about his experiences with the Volksjäger. I could provide some more info if needed.
@kentjunellsuspene6906Ай бұрын
I have class tomorrow, it's currently 12:17 am but I gotta watch this first before I sleep Edit: it's 4:53 am now, I didn't sleep cuz i have important things that needed to be done. You know.. school stuff and etc.
@Juan-qv5ncАй бұрын
Why the numbers (12:17) in your comment don't get turned into a link to the time-point?
@kentjunellsuspene6906Ай бұрын
@@Juan-qv5nc idk man...
@Juan-qv5ncАй бұрын
@@kentjunellsuspene6906 It seems you have hidden powers.
@--AnonymousUser--Ай бұрын
@@Juan-qv5nc Maybe KZbin recognizes the trailing am/pm
@Juan-qv5ncАй бұрын
@@--AnonymousUser-- Nice hypothesis. Let's test it: 12:16 am
@robertkerr41995 күн бұрын
Nice work on the modeling! I love how the pilot just gets wedged in between the two engines.. would be nice and warm at altitude.
@robertmiller2173Ай бұрын
I have made a model of this aircraft. It is beautifully simple! 1,000 Kg bomb load, at 1,000 mph, with a range of 1,000 kilometres. It is truly beautiful!. This is an excellent documentary!
@FiveCentsPleaseАй бұрын
+@robertmiller2173 Goring's design request was for an aircraft capable of 1,000 kg (2,200 lb) load over 1,000 km (620 mi) at 1,000 km per hour (620 mph.) The Horten brothers offered a design for the request (but it really was a way for them get money to do more research on flying wings.)
@deltavee2Ай бұрын
Outstanding graphics and logical and comprehensible commentary have just got you another subscriber. Looking forward further works. Good stuff ! I've always been an admirer of the 229's design.
@peekaboo1575Ай бұрын
The most fascinating aircraft of WW2, hands down.
@taproom113Ай бұрын
Agree!
@theboi9382Ай бұрын
Me 163, Me 262 and Ho 229 are the peakest planes
@22airjordan1Ай бұрын
I would add the Boeing B29. Worlds first Nuclear Bomber. It was a larger project and cost more than the Manhattan Project. It was extremely advanced and very complicated for its day
@JustanotherconsumerАй бұрын
Check out the contemporary XP-79. Equally disastrous failure, but even more exotic for the day with experimental prone pilot and magnesium construction.
@robertelmo7736Ай бұрын
@@22airjordan1 And it actually flew, and did stuff lol... this thing was a pipe dream.
@TricksterJ97Ай бұрын
Great video! You asked for feedback : I don’t believe the Horton had afterburners. Therefore there should not be any flames coming out of the jets. The burning should be concluded before the turbine wheel.
@JustanotherconsumerАй бұрын
It did not, the first afterburners did happen during WW2 but the Germans did not use them.
@StevePotterАй бұрын
Beautifully done graphics! I love the exploded views of all the parts.
@tomparatube6506Ай бұрын
Amazing, unbelievable modeling & animation coupled with great narration and presentation. All together so educational on a near-mythical plane. Thanks so much!🤗🤗
@carknewАй бұрын
One of the most amazing documentaries I've ever seen
@sandgrownun66Ай бұрын
Well, you obviously haven't seen many documentaries then. The Ascent Of Man, The World At War, and Life On Earth would be a good start.
@carknewАй бұрын
@@sandgrownun66 You sure seem to have astounding social skills
@ukasz-zm9qcАй бұрын
This is not a documentary. You could rather call it a 3D visualization.
@sandgrownun66Ай бұрын
@@carknew You're welcome. I'm glad to be of assistance. Have you seen the documentaries I mentioned? I have several times. I'm going to add "Civilisation" to the list as well.
@BELCAN57Ай бұрын
Great way to bring this aircraft to life. Thank you !
@agrxdrowflow958Ай бұрын
Good job. Impressive CAD.
@stevfellАй бұрын
Not sure why and even how you can dislike this video. This channel is goated
@dimitrijensk2845Ай бұрын
14:54 loved the video! For future videos though, it would be nice if you could include the length of an average runway or the takeoff distance of a more well known aircraft like the bf109 for example, so we can have something as a reference.
Ай бұрын
Impresionante y detallado informe. ¡Felicitaciones!
@jetlifex4355Ай бұрын
this is top tier content
@AndyBonesSynthPro6 күн бұрын
Such a great doc on this incredible plane. The graphics, specs, narration= worthy of premium platforms. Instant subscribe, thank you for this!!
@luisalbertovizarretagalicia17 сағат бұрын
What an interesting connection! The Horten Ho 229, known as the German "flying wing" from World War II, and the ideas of Pedro Paulet, the Peruvian pioneer of astronautics, share certain parallels in terms of avant-garde design for their time. Both envisioned innovative concepts that broke traditional aerodynamic paradigms.
@cicker007Ай бұрын
I've seen a lot of videos, but this one in particular is unique not only because of the story of the plane but the fine quality of the creators' graphics!
@joshuabrown2337Ай бұрын
Could you do the sturmtiger?
@paralystepsisАй бұрын
Or just tiger
@Fv4k5Ай бұрын
Chief this is a plane priority channel
@TheBreadSoldierАй бұрын
@@Fv4k5priority? Yes. Only? Possibly not.
@Lumine_KaiАй бұрын
@@Fv4k5they did a sherman and submarine, no reason they cant do another tank
@TheGermanKrankenwagenАй бұрын
Maybe the Do 17/215/217 next? Particularly the nightfighter variants.
@LOLA6ifyable17 күн бұрын
Never thought a video about a war machine could be so relaxing. Love it! beautifully made video , through and through .
@williamclaeyssens7 күн бұрын
never thought i could learn so easy watching a documentary ! Congratulations ....factastic !!
@acQ_piАй бұрын
Beautiful video.
@Idahoguy10157Ай бұрын
Jack Northrop had a flying prototype flying wing. Then Northrop built a flying wing bomber. Two bombers actually. Concurrent developments
@norsenomadАй бұрын
I agree, John Knudsen Northrop was a great aerospace engineer and designer of his time. But the Horten Brothers (particularly Reimar) were even further ahead, with their long series of elegant designs (a total of 71 known airframe designations, according to R.E. Lee), since their teenage years. First Horten true flying wing took flight in 1933, and first Northrop true flying wing in 1940. Reimar had inspiration for pure designs and scientific insight from "the father of modern fluid dynamics", the famous Dr. Ludwig Prandtl of the world leading University of Göttingen. Reimar achieved his PhD in Fluid Dynamics. I can recommemd the book 'Only the Wing: Reimar Horten's Epic Quest to Stabilize and Control the All-Wing Aircraft' (2011) by Russel E. Lee, curator in the Aeronautics Department of the Smithsonian Institution’s National Air and Space Museum. Northrop made great aircrafts, but just look at the clean lines of the elegant Horten gliders, e.g. the Ho-IV.
@romanvarcolac2238Ай бұрын
@@norsenomadYeah, Northrop was great, but he certainly did not put a jet engine in a flying wing ahead of Horten. The YB-35s were only flying after the war, though they were really impressive aircraft.
@norsenomadАй бұрын
@@romanvarcolac2238 It is fair to count in Northrop's N-1M (neither a jet), predecessor to Y-35 aka N-9M, which flew almost 100 testflights from 1940 to 1943. Later came the Y-35, but it had some directional oscillation (yaw) issues and also serious structural issues, which was never sorted out before the accidents happened. Northrop's Avion Model 1, which flew in 1929, does not count as a true flying wing, as it obviously had a long tail to achieve flight and stability. A pure flying wing is the lowest-drag design configuration, theoretically. Reimar Horten could envision this pure design, and it became his goal already in his teens (note the book title I mentioned). He understood and realized early the required fluid dynamics science that Prandtl had recently discovered and published, as great steps forward for modern aerodynamics.
@florencemodina6293Ай бұрын
The one he copied from the germans?
@TerrariumFirmaАй бұрын
@@florencemodina6293 Actually, Geoffrey Hill was Northrop's mentor. He travelled to Canada and USA to teach engineers about flying wing design.
@alexcastas8405Ай бұрын
1:59 So the peeps with balsa wood planes with a jet engine are not far off this really!! 😂 Crazy!!
@alexandermoriarty9167Ай бұрын
THE ONLY MISSING IS THE FATAL ACCIDENT THAT OCCURRED WITH THE TEST PILOT I suspect that this accident was caused precisely by the difficulty in controlling the plane without vertical stabilizers. But I would have really liked the video to have talked about this in more detail... Apart from that, the video is perfect! It even made me want to fly one of these... Who knows, maybe there's a World War II simulation game where I can do that... Congratulations on your work!
@einautofan6685Ай бұрын
S.W.O.T.L. = Secret Weapons of the Luftwaffe was a PC Game by Lucas Arts in the 90's, War Thunder is the current PC Game were you can fly the (Ho-IX) Go-229! Have Fun! 😉👍 The crash with Prototype V2 happend because of a failing jet engine. Unfortunately it was the one jet engine that also supports the hydraulics and rudders... Also Erwin Ziller was too low to safely bail out... I remember I have red something like that in one of my Horten Books...
@alexandermoriarty9167Ай бұрын
@@einautofan6685 Man, thanks a lot! That cleared everything up! And thanks for the game tip! Hugs
@einautofan6685Ай бұрын
@@alexandermoriarty9167 There is also a nice, big, Plastic Brick model (Like LEGO) of the Horten by Cobi available, already with painted Bricks, which looks amazing in my Cupboard in my living room. That model was also available as a "Limited Edition" for 80 Euro's (now prizes going up...) with 3 Figures (The Horten Brothers and a Pilot, I hope with more Fortune...😉) You can Display that model with a glass Stand and retracted Landing Gear but also on the Landing Gear. A nice Model, since I'm too lazy with 40 Years... to paint and built too much detailed plastik kit models (like Zoukai Mura) by myself...🤣
@alexandermoriarty9167Ай бұрын
@@einautofan6685 😅❤👍
@TanookiSuitАй бұрын
I've seen this at the museum it's truly stunning. The nazis were all kinds of awful, but credit is due in specific cases of advancement they did make legitimate work towards. This, the V1/2 project, and a few others. In a way the nazis were like a broken clock, they were almost always wrong, but very very rarely right. I had this pop up random, shockingly high quality piece of work for yet another YT channel and with so few videos to rack up that many subs is impressive. Good work.
@gravedigger7510Ай бұрын
Tiger 1 next maybe ? I don't know why but tiger 1 tank always have special place in my memories ( its my first tier 7 tank that i get in world of tanks blitz back in 2015 and the first time i playing it i managed to win 1 vs 4 and getting my first rasenai hero medal and not to mention back then i used to watch fury movie), even now i still thinking about tiger 1 tank and even planning to buy an rc tiger 1 tank for myself at Christmas
@VacaConChompaАй бұрын
El tige para es el icono de tanques de ww2, cual su vida promedio de Rc del tiger I?
@tankdood329Ай бұрын
@@VacaConChompait depends on what rc you get the more expensive ones tend to also be more repairable
@polygonalfortressАй бұрын
I'd love to see details around the Tiger 1's machinery and specifics on how its control systems were more intuitive than allied or axis counterparts 👀
@nightfeather9409Ай бұрын
HELL YEAH DEEP DIVE ON MY FAVE AIRCRAFT! I specifically made a trip to DC just to see this one, she currently rests without her wings (theyre nearby) under the left wing of the Enola Gay!
@TaldaranАй бұрын
Without its wings? Sacrilege!
@sandgrownun66Ай бұрын
It wasn't an aircraft. It was just a concept which never flew, and couldn't of anyway. A flying wing is inherently unstable, which is the last thing you need in a fighter bomber. The Me 262 was the future, and actually flew with great success.
@nightfeather9409Ай бұрын
@@sandgrownun66 .....you are aware that the second one crashed after a bunch of test flights, right?
@ironcity9053Ай бұрын
And the plywood structure is looking ragged. The glue to make it is not something you can get at the local woodworking supply shop it seems, so Smithsonian is still working/thinking on restoration. Horten was not exactly politically correct for the regime so his brother, a moderate-level manager at the Air Ministry, kept him off in the hinterlands someplace to keep him out of trouble. After the war he pitched up in Argentina and continued development through the 1950s but never got anything into production.
@sandgrownun66Ай бұрын
@@nightfeather9409 "Crashed" is the operative word. The US built something similar later, and that crashed too, unaliving five men in the process.
@Creative-SeniorАй бұрын
Best 3D Documentery videos. Love the little details that makes these great to watch.
@sergechabline709014 күн бұрын
La qualité de ce documentaire est extraordinaire ! Congratulations.
@Beta_Tester03Ай бұрын
Love ur content!!!
@pyronuke4768Ай бұрын
Because I know someone is gonna try to bring it up, I am going to nip this conspiracy in the bud; no, Jack Northrop was not inspired by the 229 to make his flying wings. *Because the timelines don't add up.* He had been drawing paper designs for flying wings as early as 1929, he never crossed paths with the Horton brothers, and his famous XB-35 got the approval stamp from the government in 1940, something which would be difficult to get inspiration from another aircraft that wasn't discovered by Americans until 1945.
@wolf310iiАй бұрын
They crossed paths, one of the brothers did go to the USA after WW2 wanting to work for Northrop, but he didnt get hired so he migrated to Argentina to continue to build flying wings by its own
@pyronuke4768Ай бұрын
@@wolf310ii I too heard about this story, however all my attempts to confirm it so far have come up inconclusive. Diving down rabbit holes I found the primary source of the story to be Reimar Horton himself -- 40 years after the fact, around the same time he started claiming that he would've used charcoal to make the Ho229 stealth. From what I managed to track down of the brothers' personal exodus after the war, Walter stayed in Germany for the rest of his life, and Reimar tried and failed to get into the UK and then China before finally making it to Argentina; I cannot find any records of him trying to get into the USA that predate the 50's, after he'd spent a few years already in Argentina. So all I can say is that while there's a small chance the story could be true, I have a very hard time believing it because again the timelines don't add up.
common misconception, the US actually gained their inspiration for flying wing designs from the YB series of aircraft developed by Northrop
@tommdschohns87183 күн бұрын
I was born in Friedrichroda. The Little Town in Thuringia were the Horten Brothers lived when they designed this masterpiece.
@laserdadАй бұрын
I can't imagine how much time it took to produce this, but thank you.
@GSG8-SKRАй бұрын
wonderful video, thank you, just lack of explanations regarding the ejection seat and the parachute mechanism
@__-pl3jgАй бұрын
Imagine flying sheets of plywood at 600mph.
@karolsloboda779816 күн бұрын
Only in one documentary about Nazi planes was mention the method of making plywood. They were using special foil of glue, which was secret and only one factory was making that. Due to that foil they were able to make very strong wood, basically like a composite. But closer to the end of war that company was bombed so they couldnt make good plywood plane, they break down easily.
@gratefulguy413012 күн бұрын
It was stronger than modern plywood. For one thing it wasn't pressboard.
@CmdCodd9 күн бұрын
Like the British mosquito? 😏
@Petequinn741Ай бұрын
Crazy ahead of it's time..
@joachimregel312720 күн бұрын
Ahead of Its time. Great Animation - Project deserved 5 Stars.😊
@juanjoseflorescanales4306Ай бұрын
The takeoff process was not exactly like this for aerodynamic reasons, here is the reason. The rear wheels are far behind the center of gravity, so performing a classic rotation for the takeoff process is not an option, since it does not pivot on the rear wheels, for this to happen the rear wheels should be relatively close to the CG. In addition, the H229 on the ground showed a somewhat high angle of attack. The behavior is that, as in a tail-skid airplane during takeoff taxi, the plane slightly lifts the tail for a moment, at this moment the plane is supported on the ground only by the front wheel, and it is when the pilot had to pull to raise the plane, this moment was very critical due to the lack of longitudinal stability that it presents both aerodynamically and by the fact of being supported by only the front wheel. You can check this both in simulators and in RC models of a certain size, I have tested it in both.
@GarageBandSuperherosАй бұрын
What a neat little plane. 20 hours of operating time near the end of the war is a crazy short time for an engine.
@sandgrownun66Ай бұрын
Wasn't it ten hours, compared to the one hundred hours of the British?
@andrachambers4234Ай бұрын
Beautiful work brother! Great detail and information. Keep up the good work sir.
@Ausf.D.A.K.Ай бұрын
Fantastic work! I love German WW2 technology!
@jb76489Ай бұрын
Why? It was generally bad
@Ausf.D.A.K.Ай бұрын
@@jb76489 Hahahahahaha good one
@jb76489Ай бұрын
@@Ausf.D.A.K. who’s joking? Where was their cavity magnetron? Their proximity fuses? Their field kitchen that didn’t run on wood? Risers for paratroopers? Spare parts? Logistics in general? All or nothing battle ship armor designs? Carrier designs that could launch more than 18 aircraft an hour? Well designed tank transmission? Antibiotics?
@Ausf.D.A.K.Ай бұрын
@@jb76489 I think you're intentionally omitting the colossal advantage in resources, manpower, logistics and intelligence that the Allies had over the Axis. Italy was basically a liability and Japan was also incapable of fighting a war of attrition.
@jb76489Ай бұрын
@@Ausf.D.A.K. and? So? Therefore? I didn’t say there wasn’t an obvious explanation as to why the Germans were behind. But yes, you can definitely add bad decision making skills and shitty ally to the list of German failings
@Meister18324 күн бұрын
I'm a military aviation historian and I need to make a correction. The official name for the proposed aircraft was Horten IX later when it was made into a prototype it was called Gotha 229. Calling it the Horten Ho 229 while is okay it's technically incorrect
@tomaccinoАй бұрын
This is _unreal!_ Fantastic modeling. Mad respect to whomever made this.
@moonashaАй бұрын
the fact a plane from 1945 managed to be stable without a vertical stab is just insane.
@cristianmigueliparraguirre8750Ай бұрын
No se comprobó que era estable, de hecho se estrello en su primer vuelo de prueba. seguramente porque era inestable.
@ito-wx8wsАй бұрын
German avant-garde design is amazing!! 🤩🤩🤩
@jamesphilip6737Ай бұрын
Now do the Northrup YB-49.
@Pikachugamer-20076 күн бұрын
This video is amazing, my only gripe is that you continued to feature "afterburner flames" out of the exhaust of the jet engines. These early jets did not have flamed exhaust.
@kmod_oneАй бұрын
Amazing Video. Love the 3D Model you guys made!
@carrickrichards2457Ай бұрын
Until the B2 with its constant computer control, flying wings were impossibly unstable. Northrop made several attempts eg YB49.
@bradywomack9751Ай бұрын
So true.
@dom3827Ай бұрын
The Horton was the first flying wing which was actually fairly stable. That is why the US inspected it so deeply on how it managed to do that.
@gp33music41Ай бұрын
@@dom3827 Not really, the prototype crashed, and if the US drew from the 229 for it's stability, the YB 35 and 49 would have the bell shape.
@Just_A_Random_DeskАй бұрын
@@dom3827 germong spotted
@dom3827Ай бұрын
@@gp33music41 one of 3 flying prototypes crashed due to a malfunction. No one said they drew from horton. You made that up to have an argument.
@DH-bw2rxАй бұрын
Wonder if some super rich guy will ever try building one of these? There’s new versions of the 262 from Legend Flyers, maybe this will happen someday?
@LonewolfmikeАй бұрын
The problem with flying wings is they need constant micro adjusting and it hans't been until the last few decades that the computing power was small enough to put it intoo a bomber let alone a fighter. The reason you see them in jet drones noow for fighters is no need for pilots.
@randompalmtopgaming7541Ай бұрын
This channel is just pure brilliant PERFECTION
@johnandreu9115Ай бұрын
It wasn't the first jet. Heinkel He 178 flew years before it. and Turbines were patented by the British as far back as 1929 It wasn't even the first flying wing of WW2. Northrop developed one in 1939. But it looks cool
@christianifechukwu9865Ай бұрын
Imagine doing all this with 1940s technology under wartime conditions. The Germans are a remarkable people
@gratefulguy413012 күн бұрын
Truly
@hoytoy100Ай бұрын
It was great until Captain America ditched it into the ice.
@fiegiАй бұрын
Deutschland war mal Hightec-Land, heute wollen wir Lastenräder bauen, geil!!!!
@jsgf6620 күн бұрын
Mil gracias bro 1ro por la pista en español, 2do por tomarte el tiempo en hacer esas increibles animaciones valen oro, Sub+Like!c:
@morgan398Ай бұрын
Glad your back, the planter looks great , and handy. Thanks for posting.
@cheezeball6109Ай бұрын
This looks like a B2 bomber
@GabrielCunha.Ай бұрын
Na verdade é o B2 que parece com ele, ele foi criado primeiro.