How scientific papers are published

You might be wondering how scientific papers are published. I have published 12 scientific papers, and I can tell you the 7 steps need to publish a scientific paper. I have been accepted and rejected from scientific journals, and I will even show you my reviewer comments from two of my accepted papers. The review of research by other researchers is called peer-review. One peer reviewer is kind and straightforward, the other is also straightforward but snarky. Either way, I hope you enjoy some insight into the scientific paper process and how it can take 2-10 years to publish a single scientific paper.

[@docn.235]

Thank you for the new video. I really, really recommend a good external microphone (like i.e. Rhode or Sennheiser) since your sound is sometimes too electronically "squeezed" like in internet-phone with bad connection (I admit, I watch mostly youtube on 1,5x-2x speed). Since you offer great profesional content, your voice should also be professionally recorded and easy to understand acoustically. Also some machines in the background can be heared in some videos (I watched them all, meanwhile). Carry on!

[@friendlyneighborhoodimmuno7192]

Thanks! Maybe I can get one in December!

[@friendlyneighborhoodimmuno7192]

Thank you so much! I think I’ll be able to upgrade in December.

[@tgifford4]

Carriers of at least one APOE4 allele (rs429358) are protected against T2DM related retinopathy (OR [95% CI] = 0.65 [0.42-0.99]. Protection against retinopathy is driven mostly by females (OR [95% CI] = 0.50 [0.25-0.99]); and remains significant (P = 0.044) after adjustment for diabetes duration and BMI.

[@celestialfix]

Is it true that the last name on an article is actually the Lead Investigator? If so, I admire the humble unpretentiousness of that……I hope that tradition continues in Science.

[@friendlyneighborhoodimmuno7192]

Yes that’s correct!

[@friendlyneighborhoodimmuno7192]

Yes that’s correct!

[@SeanRhoadesChristopher]

That’s good to know how difficult it is, to publish, I have a greater appreciation for Chemist Dr. James Tour, who has over 700 papers published.

[@friendlyneighborhoodimmuno7192]

Wow that's an incredible number of publications!

[@lernenderzukunft]

I really appreciate your work! It helps me figuring out this biology world ☺️ Could you please do a comparison of the new vaccines of Valneva and Novavax to the mRNA when it comes to the Delta variant soon?

[@hurtmanp5803]

Isaiah 55:6-7 King James Version 6 Seek ye the Lord while he may be found, call ye upon him while he is near: 7 Let the wicked forsake his way, and the unrighteous man his thoughts: and let him return unto the Lord, and he will have mercy upon him; and to our God, for he will abundantly pardon. In Jesus name....

[@davidsweeney111]

Hi do you know if a vaccine injected into muscle stays in the muscle or does it go into the bloodstream? Thanks 😊

[@friendlyneighborhoodimmuno7192]

I had a video on this, but KZbin took it down. The vaccine mostly stays in the muscle (over 83%). The rest is cleared from your blood stream in 2-72 hours.

[@user-zn9gk9do9l]

How about the book entitled "Plague Of Corruption" by Dr. Judy Mitkovits?Madam have you read it? In your opinion, natural antibodies are better or vaccines?

[@friendlyneighborhoodimmuno7192]

Very interesting question. No I have not read Dr.Mitkovits book. Natural antibodies and vaccine antibodies are very similar because they both come from your B cells. As you grow, you create your B cells so that you can have a B cell that matches almost any virus, bacteria, or fungus in the world. These B cells wait to meet their match. They can be activated by getting sick or be activated by a vaccine. In that way, they are very similar. If you get sick you make a variety of antibodies to various parts of the virus or bacteria. If you get a whole inactivated vaccine, you also make a variety of antibodies to a virus or bacteria. Some vaccines only contain small pieces of a virus or bacteria, so in that way you would have less variety of antibodies. However, the biggest advantage of a vaccine is that you get antibodies before the virus or bacteria attacks your body. Vaccines are the only way to prepare ahead of time to fight a virus or bacteria. In that way, vaccines are better than natural antibodies.

[@user-zn9gk9do9l]

Better u buy it that book..

[@erikakat1812]

Ever see funny movie "The Wedding Crashers" w Owen Wilson and Vince Vaughn......there a one liner...."nature vs nuture, nature always wins"....disclaimer...I'm always wrong.... shhh.. YukTuk is always right

[@friendlyneighborhoodimmuno7192]

@@erikakat1812 I do like Owen Wilson

[@techroach6343]

Are you familiar with Stanley Pearlmans work on t cell immunity in relation to sars-cov-2?

[@friendlyneighborhoodimmuno7192]

No I just looked him up. I would be interested in reading his research papers. Is there something in particular you like from his work?

[@techroach6343]

@@friendlyneighborhoodimmuno7192 sorry for the late reply. I'm interested in his work as it forms the basis for part of Dr J Couey's stance against the subunit mRNA transfection bring forced on people. Pearlmans papers clearly show antibodies to the s glycoprotein are subordinate to cd4 and cd8 responses. I'd be super keen to see you chat with JC about sars-cov-2 immunology. To my mind he's the leading voice on this topic. (JC is a well known and respected patchclamp physiologist - he's well published. He's also a founding member of D.R.A.S.T.I.C). I can organise a stream with him in the future if that interests you. Thanks for your channel. Good stuff. I'm thinking about doing a masters in immunology.