How to find your Destiny, with James Hillman's "The Soul's Code"

[@johnl5316]

This PhD clinical psychologist in the USA was glad to see this.

[@deborahjessop997]

Thank you for taking the time to revisit James Hillman's book and for presenting his thesis clearly. He deserves reconsideration in our mechanistic, AI world. Thomas Moore also writes about soul and encourages us to respond daily.

[@junefield5420]

loving your channel

[@AncientGreeceRevisited]

Thank you and welcome on-board

[@maddysinclair5232]

Interesting theme. Thanks for exploring... hope you revisit down the road.

[@michellem7290]

Fascinating… I will add it to my list 🙂

[@kevinaldrich5862]

Nice one. I love it.

[@achillebrlnds]

interesting theme, great job

[@AncientGreeceRevisited]

Glad you like it!

[@MeHighB]

Accurate as always. I might add that regardless if Kastrup is right and the phenomena is only a projection in matter of the unconceivable reality of the Universal Mind, and a reduction of our minds of the incomprehensible complexity of Reality, every agency asserted on it, inflicted upon the world of phenomena, will have a domino effect as a substrate, logical and natural. Like our thoughts. And actions. The main error is to expect something unspecific, unnatural and illogical to be the proof of agency. Of free will.

[@AncientGreeceRevisited]

I don’t think I understood a word of what you said :-)

[@MeHighB]

@@AncientGreeceRevisited I meant that every display of free will will have a logical material linage... a deterministic string of events at the atomic scale. Will not be an illogical jump. Regardless if this Universe is a mind or the Universe has a mind... or its constituents, like you and me and anywhere in between.

[@brian423]

Thanks for speaking up for James Hillman again. But after all, you're the one to do it, since you're a defender of the pagan, polytheistic side of the Western tradition. The essential reason for Hillman's unpopularity among orthodox Jungians is his rebellion against Jung's crypto-Christianity, the insistence upon a unified self to mirror a monotheistically unified heaven.

[@AncientGreeceRevisited]

You might be right on that one. In fact, reading Jung is such a fascinating journey, but one feels that he tried to “pin down” some essence about the human soul that always evaded him. Hill man took another approach. He never tried to reach a conclusion but allowed phenomena to speak for themselves.

[@frogman-wm6js]

the fact you get to decide if you believe you have free will or not should tell you something.

[@AncientGreeceRevisited]

Well, for the staunch atheist you don’t really choose, you only think you do. But that’s for another video I guess :-)