HYDRAULIC PRESS VS ORIGINAL AND FAKE SHOCKPROOF WATCHES

Let's test the strength of the Cassio G-shock shockproof watch with a hydraulic press. Copy and original which is stronger

[@taimurdurani1692]

According to the price of fake G-shock (12$) i think the watch is still worthy to buy because the watch has tolerated 157 kg of weight 😂

[@ElitexEdits]

Yaa

[@surajsinha897]

Ysss🤣

[@alpon6]

Approx 13 kg of tolerance per buck, damn this is great in fact

[@LWIN729]

I wanted this say this too. The fake one👍 is good enough for daily. G shock will shock your wallet too 😂😂

[@ElitexEdits]

@@LWIN729 haha ur right

[@Sadhana-Vibhuti213]

Ziarex must be stopped at all costs. People are losing money since their mega clone watches started to be sold as originals on the aftermarket.

[@tyroneuva-py1pg]

This person got a fake one

[@motu-ki3el]

What a crime to see a historic clock from the 70s smashed in an unprecedented test that proves that with enough pressure from a hydraulic machine, any clock breaks. That old and still working clock did not deserve to end like this.

[@ThinhNguyenNow]

It's a Russian watch, Vostok Komandirskie, same design as in the cold war but you can bike for

[@BlueFalcata]

Science requires sacrifices

[@Kriegerdammerung]

@@ThinhNguyenNow It was a Soviet watch, not Russian.

[@Nikioko]

😥

[@Nikioko]

@@ThinhNguyenNow It doesn't matter what it costs. Destroying a genuine watch is a crime.

[@seahorse1171]

"Don't try this at home " Me slowly keeping back my hydraulic press in the pocket

[@timetraveler9019]

Dark 🌚

[@Bored_wreked]

Lightless 🤭

[@HarbingerOfDawN_]

@@timetraveler9019 bruh nothing's dark stop faking

[@mevio4665]

Thank you 😂😂

[@ivanrovinov]

@@HarbingerOfDawN_ NoThInGs' LiGhT.....iTs OnLy ThE aBsEnCe Of DaRkNeSs!

[@branimirantic3625]

Shock resistant does not mean crush resistant. It was build to resist G forces (therefore G-shock), not heavy weight.

[@sccorpiongmr4742]

Exactaly what i thought

[@julius12345ceaser]

Hence good structural strength to resists 157 and 350 Kg respectively.

[@speedingdyno2702]

Exactly g shock ka matlab hi gravitational shock jisse agar wo apse gir jaye to use kuch na hoo

[@demonga9150]

Yeah bro I was also thinking ths

[@GOTTHEDAWGINME]

G forces are literally forces of gravity... What will gravity even do to a normal watch...

[@arnavaher2826]

Ahh yes, a regular scenario where my arm goes under a hydraulic press. What a reliable watch

[@menantumakawak]

Durability test

[@marioelburro1492]

You never know when someone kidnaps you and puts your arm under a hydraulic press😂 You might break your wrist but at least youll have a cool watch💀

[@lucky_lol]

@@menantumakawak he is just kidding around lol (Nice username btw)

[@lucky_lol]

@@marioelburro1492 chances of that are low but never zero

[@evolution8662]

The watch will survive the hydraulic press...... Not your arm......

[@nikosmarkos]

1:15 i like the fact that he gently passes the knife through the original glass and later on at 1:36 really pushes hard to create a scratch on the fake.

[@mitulgoyal6533]

true bro😂😂

[@Anonymous_o]

Basically he wants to prove that fake is fake😂

[@elvirareforma7970]

Actually,if it does not scratch it just slides and looks like your not putting any effort but when it scratches it burrows some of the blade bc thats a cutter, a very sharp blade it looks like your putting alot of effort.

[@grrbrr5290]

No the real one has a much smoother and harder surface than the fake soft one, hence the blade glides over and sinks in respectively

[@theprodigy2653]

Was expecting it on the fake before he does. 🤣😅

[@bigbuba5212]

Whoever made the fake should start their own brand because that's a pretty solid watch for the price

[@JandonGames]

They already did. The brand name is SKMEI :-)

[@riteshkashyap1468]

Oh is it urs 😂

[@jamesieadams]

70’s watch featured a function that ejects the movement when it realises its in a hydraulic press. What you didn’t see off camera was the parachute deploy and the movement land safely on the ground.

[@bhavishaysingh1374]

Sir could you explain me more🙂

[@AR-cy8je]

@@bhavishaysingh1374 he's joking lmao

[@user-ye9cl6eq5y]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/fpjcdIGMeZp4nKc

[@yashrajpatel3502]

😂😂😂

[@kulrajsingh2017]

@@AR-cy8je i think he is joking as well or ge is dumb

[@gabrielrey8258]

The way he try to scratch the Original was so smoothest like he was touching his eyes 🤣🤣🤭 than Fake one 😂😂

[@user-JOHN610]

💯

[@yunhaituanzhang]

Same as my first thought bro.

[@utubeboss4532]

Yes😂

[@abduplay]

Really 💯

[@nagavenkatalakshmi5198]

100

[@illmatic270]

That scratch test was a joke.. 😂

[@Sora_L1nx]

lmao true. just lightly scratching the real while putting pressure on the fake one

[@umacreanonoyt9477]

Mineral crystal vz platic

[@JM-ym8mm]

He's being mindful of the blade. That is a Sapphire crystal, or at the very least mineral glass coated with Sapphire, meaning there's no amount of pushing down with a box cutter in your hand that's going to scratch it. Worst that could happen is that the blade slips and you end up hurting yourself.

[@illmatic270]

@@JM-ym8mm blah blah blah blah

[@JM-ym8mm]

@@illmatic270 go to school kiddo 😜

[@fromfareastindy8234]

I thought it was an impact resistance test, but it was a pressure resistance test. If you want to get a good score in the pressure resistance test, simply make the outer shell made of tough metal. G-Shock has a model with a titanium alloy outer shell, so I recommend you to use that for the test. However, being hard is not the same as being strong.

[@hamdifouzai4713]

My 10€ Aliexpress watch has titanium alloy too...

[@dennismikhailitsky3735]

@@hamdifouzai4713 sorry to break it to you, but most likely it's aluminum, hence lightweight.

[@nemesis91101]

I would have happily taken that old watch and I don't even collect them. Just sad to see a piece of history go.

[@tomas6224]

@@subhojitbiswas5824 yeah... metal vs plastics...

[@tomas6224]

@@subhojitbiswas5824 Just saying it is nonsense to put old watch in this comparison. Then he should put new metal watches as well..

[@nemesis91101]

@@tomas6224 I think the old watch was fake too? If so then i dont care but if it was real...

[@patrickriarchy6054]

On e bay there are tons for under $50. Just search for Vostok.

[@damyr]

@@nemesis91101 It's a Vostok Komandirski, a very cheap watch, pretty tough, but not very reliable and far from being precise.

[@user-mm6fb6jb6g]

It was later found out that the old Soviet watch was worn by Khrushchev, and was valued at about two million dollars.

[@Someone_1_2_3_]

Wait really?

[@xisktrl]

What

[@thomaschristopherwhite9043]

It's a vostok.

[@JordanN404]

I’m dont believe that

[@pukiface]

I immediately thought so, poor antique clock..:(

[@alessandrozuffi5068]

I have the same G-shock, it's a really nice watch and very reliable, as any Casio is. That being said it's a weird test because the G-shock line is built to resist falling, it has to be water proof, so they have to resist shocks and water infiltrations more than sustain weights. That poor vostok tho, it looked like it was running fast and probably wasn't worth the cost of servicing, but as a watch enthisiast it still breaks my heart to see it getting destroyed (I feel a little bad for the fake one too).

[@ryuzaki_ray]

As a watch enthusiast, it hurts while watching a nice piece of watches being destroyed.

[@hamidjarchi8924]

I also felt heart shattered because they smashed to death

[@grimmer2005]

It is a bit painful to see nice fully working watches being destroyed like this xD

[@user-jd7rt3dk5u]

Yes bro when we actually wanted to buy the watch 🤧

[@gavinrabinowitz1255]

I can assure you , when you make as much money from this channel as he does you won"t feel so bad destroying some watches !

[@duckblock]

Have you seen the one where also a guy with a hydraulic press destroyed a diamond?

[@reezevlog]

yeah..just for the sake of collecting views n subscribers…..🤭

[@anandhakrishnana.k.1559]

Not Really 🚶

[@abhisheksarkar_neo]

Love how the fake watch’s alarm started going off as soon as it started getting crushed! Like its a plea for help 😆

[@primordial7486]

🤣

[@shashankkumardwivedi43]

😂😂

[@CrispMan1]

1:28 bro gently scarped the original one and straight up put his whole body strength on the other two.

[@monsterman6342]

He cannot scratch it with that metal knife. The knife just glides across the surface with whatever force you apply. It's due to the hardness of the glass. Original G-Shocks generally use Mineral glass and/or sapphire glass which comes second only to diamonds in terms of hardness. (It should be noted that hardness does not mean resistance to breaking rather hard substances are generally brittle.) You'll either need an object made up of diamond or sapphire itself to scratch the glass. I have tried scratching my G-Shock with knives and other metals which generally do nothing. But things were not the same when I tried it with sand. It got scratched with sand. (I looked it up and found that sand contains mixture of many minerals which includes sapphire and even diamonds in some cases) . My point is it's nearly impossible to scratch it that easily with metal. It's otherwise if you're applying force like a maniac to that little glass.

[@aryanthakkar9206]

Exactly

[@Mr_Kuky_]

I was looking for this comment xd it's obvious xd

[@dr.charlesedwardflorendobr3952]

I'm impressed! How did you keep the watches in place while they got pressed so hard?

[@prayagrajbhuyan9791]

The 12$ one is only 10% of the original’s price, but took almost 50% of the weight the original one took. So certainly, I’ll go for the 12$ product because it is 90% cheaper but also 50% capable of the original one.

[@kingsly1031]

It's not always price.

[@armingamer5546]

Besides, who the hell can hold like +100kg on their wrist 😟

[@rhezaedward]

have you calculated the durability and reliability percentage?

[@dheerajmalviya]

@Hey Girl I Like Your Kitchen Romania ?

[@victorbraga6572]

Yeah bro, because a hydraulic press test definitely show the entire value of a watch, thats what they're made for

[@andriyzhuk8830]

For $12 I'm pretty impressed.

[@ayanbossyt7536]

Here in india we can get the same 12 dollar watch in just 1 dollar

[@scaredmouse6643]

@@ayanbossyt7536 no ones giving you a watch in 75₹ even in india 😂

[@ayanbossyt7536]

@@scaredmouse6643 they actually do in up

[@aniket5825]

@@ayanbossyt7536 lol maybe 🥴in region you live but no way near where i live lmao stop fooling

[@ayanbossyt7536]

@@aniket5825 no here in local market they sell for 75 rs if you dont believe then that's your opinion

[@noisepuppet]

The basic digital G-Shock square cost about $50 US, and after I finally bought one and wore it, I wondered what took me so long. These are fantastic tool watches and certainly more accurate than any Rolex. (Not a fair comparison, I realize.)

[@edip2128]

This video helps me a lot. You certainly hate it when your hand goes to the hydraulic machine.

[@unofficialgamer1884]

Seeing him destroy the vintage watch almost gave me heart attack

[@borbetomagus]

Admittedly, I've cringed when people did 'drop test' videos of products that are very desired, yet (at the time) were very hard to come by. This watch is still made, but with a different casing -- Vostok Watch Komandirskie 439072 for $40. Other 'Komandirskie' watches utilizing the same case -- 219123, 219179, 219452, etc. Vostok offers replacement parts, so one could probably piece together a close replica, if so desired. It's not certain if patina will occur as some of these 'brass' cases age. The acrylic crystal is a feature on the Vostok 'Amfibia' dive watches, as they flex and add protection while under heavy pressure -- /watch?v=FwNFy2A7rmU&t=377s One can use 'PolyWatch' to buff out any scratches that may occur while wearing watches with acrylic crystals.

[@azeemjoyia640]

I was in the same stage when he first showed the vintage watch i was like what the hell bro who will did this with such ⌚

[@loloutplays5232]

You actually can buy this kind of watches from eastern europe from local people and they are cheap...

[@mikemikeetoo9094]

I thought the same it was a beautiful komandirskie watch

[@nathancullen5073]

Can't believe he destroyed an original g shock Casio

[@ilhamn1177]

If my watch was put under that much pressure in real life, then I would already be crushed long before my watch 😂

[@blahmin8344]

Bro fr

[@dukegotpowers]

You made The best line of all………

[@oldguy624]

150 kg won't do much to you tbh.

[@creeper6831]

​@@oldguy624bro why not? If a 10kg hammer falls on ur wrist it already hurt like hell

[@oldguy624]

@@creeper6831 because it falls on you, so it's no longer 10kg, as it has all the energy from the fall, in other hands of you gently put a 10kg hammer on your wrist, you wouldn't feel much.

[@jteaa21]

that 70's was gorgeous. Sad to see it getting destroyed like this.

[@gigachad69775]

The front glass of the original one: Aight imma head out

[@hoomanAdnan]

2:18 soul getting out of the body 🙌🏼

[@NotsoPHYSale]

This is too cruel You can hear the fake watch screaming for help at 2:12

[@NotsoPHYSale]

And the hydraulic's evil laugh at 3:00

[@AlwaysOnForever]

Idk why but it feels sad though

[@user-co7ze1do4g]

Although I had doubts about buying a replica watch, gussl dispelled my doubts. The watch has an authentic look and feel.

[@disclosed2229]

It's a good job they told me not to try this at home!!! I was just going to put my watch in my hydrolic press..

[@madhavdua1246]

5:47 I love the fact that how the Glass of the Original one remains safe

[@FrozenBusChannel]

That's real quality

[@mikeg8276]

That’s because it’s a heavy duty mineral glass. A sapphire crystal is more scratch resistant than mineral, but it’s also more likely to have shattered under the same pressure. The other two watches probably had acrylic crystals, which is why it bent rather than shattering or popping out of the bezel intact.

[@ahmedvlogs9473]

It’s shock proof yo!

[@Toogoodtobetrue458]

In the 70s watches were pretty much made with acrylic crystals. I have a Waltham diver and a omega sea master both with acrylic. At the point when the movement pops out the test is over.

[@draydicayne]

the real watch on the thumbnail, that model is exactly what I got.

[@brotendo]

I love how you glide over the real G Shock with the utility knife and then dig into the fake lol.

[@nsbogert]

This is how I check all my watches for authenticity.

[@mevio4665]

Way to go Nick. Nobody can fake that. And if you need to know the time, you can always ask someone on the street.

[@ioannismichalopoulos4173]

Why the fuck did you destroy the soviet one? At least, you proved the superiority of soviet endurance...

[@Frumious_Jabberwocky]

Because it has no collectable value and it is still in production.

[@madnimalek9282]

Now I don't have to fear putting my arm under the hydraulic press until I've a G-Shock on!

[@yogeshkumawat3083]

I would definitely buy the fake one after watching your demo😂...

[@trucidio]

luckily there is a warning before the video starts... I almost used my portable 500 ton press to smash thing that I have at home

[@JaspreetSingh-hf3rz]

😂😂😂

[@jeffsmith351]

I'm laughing at this! So so funny!

[@spudeedeelweiss]

somewhere in this world there is someone who would treat that $12 watch as his most priced possession and will be grateful forever in his life.

[@DodgerEcho]

Sieklo, sensing danger, immediately decided to retreat...🤣🤣🤣

[@danaycroyd]

It would nice if you do summary of performance of everything you destroy in the end of the video. In this case- original took that much pressure, fake that much and so on. By the way, brilliant channel and you are spending a lots of money. keep on doing it, you are one of the kind, not much competition for you!

[@arkadiybalickiy4620]

Касание ножа????

[@nazhercorcega6332]

agree

[@armaanahmed69]

"Don't try this at home" Ah! Man I was about to buy a hydraulic press

[@akhlaqueahmad467]

Old is always gold✊

[@rushikeshjagtap233]

Shock is subjecting an object to sudden loading and this test demonstrated gradual loading. Also G-Shock stands for gravitational shock so I doubt it would be subjected to loads of intensity so implied in the video.

[@bookedsam]

Exactly. People seem to believe if it survives gradual pressure increase its better but, in reality, when you drop the watch the shock will be sudden. The cheap one will most likely transfer the energy to the internals while the g-shock survives

[@nathaniel261]

This is so painfully shocking to watch.

[@SoapMcCallister]

mate

[@shyganlegend3040]

Bro

[@suri1641]

Bro

[@littlethor]

Bro

[@WoW-nz2gp]

dude

[@nemesis91101]

_scratches at a level 7 with deeper grooves at a level 8_

[@afonsofreitas3595]

I see what you did there JerryRig fanboy 🤣🤣 Love his videos too 🔥

[@nemesis91101]

@@afonsofreitas3595 YES! Great channel

[@anees-pilaparambil]

Jerry

[@rakeshsrivastava3821]

You are the best bro keep going

[@LucasPenido23]

In love with that Vostok Komandirskie!

[@SankalpaMadhawaMusic]

That fake looks 100% identical for the original (from outside) . I've seen a lot of fake G shocks but this is lit 💥

[@696DRK]

You can see made in Japan on the fake one, but Casio now made in Thailand and China only so only cased in Japan is the original one.

[@wadesaxton6079]

It doesn’t look identical. They’re very different and you can tell the fake is lower quality.

[@bryanobrien2726]

Fakes only look good from far away . The screws on the back were cheap as hell . Casio screws are beautiful . The hands were crude as well . The blue paint on the bezel is very crudely applied if you look closely at it . The printing on the face tends to be not as sharp as the real thing . I've seen worse fakes , but this one is not perfect by any means .

[@Makavelian97]

​@@696DRK the higher end Casio - Oceanus, MTG and MRG are the exceptions to this.

[@ABCRapster]

From a distance it may look the same but some details make the original and fake stand out. The back plate, the hands, dial’s, etc. The strap on the original one has a glossy finish as where the fake one just looks Matte.

[@ThomasWilde3003]

5:08 Wow! Can't believe that this old watch withstood 482 kg! This proves that *OLD IS GOLD*

[@hydrafx2090]

Because the watch was made of metal

[@tathagatachakraborty9353]

Yeah and he has wasted it! Unworthy fellow

[@ThomasWilde3003]

@@tathagatachakraborty9353 You're right.

[@brianilagan887]

that's all we need if we buy legimate watch to proved the authenticity of this crap. make sure that the store have a hydro machine then demo and try infront of the buyers so that the proof??? so wheres is the watch store that have hydro machine so that i could buy???

[@tonka555]

The original g-shock uis so impressive, the glass didn't even break, it just popped off

[@syafieq_rhzm]

Legend ever said.. Every masterpiece has their own cheap copy

[@i____r9480]

Him: DO NOT REPEAT AT HOME Yeah as if i had a freaking hydraulic press at my house😂

[@kapsakattumaram]

1:19 you not put pressure to scratch 🤣

[@ianholderness5773]

The only thing you have proved is that your hidrolic press can crush a watch, which i think most people would have guessed. i dont know why, but i still watched it 😂

[@nadinebaki1201]

“Don’t repeat this at home” Ah yes, him doing it in his living room

[@catherinehughes2155]

I love the concept and idea behind this video. Keep it up. I have to mention this also. In life the major goal is to be healthy, have a good shelter over your head, feed well and be FINANCIALLY STABLE in other words have money, once you have all this, life will be easy.

[@kirkcameron9465]

This particular reason is why I invest, because its the first step to build and accumulate finance for a better future.

[@torkwaskipolischez8484]

So your advice will be " For someone to become financially stable, he or she should invest?" If so, can you provide tips or guide?

[@charlescharling8282]

Over the years, the Stock market has proven to be a lucrative type of Investment providing you with high accumulation of profits on your portfolio with a professional guide and managerial skills.

[@lindsayharps3494]

I agree with you but I strongly believe and advice this, to thrive and make gain from the stock market, you will need to have a good stock portfolio handler with expertise. with there expertise, they will provide you with explicit information and guide on how to begin generating profits from the stock market.

[@charitytoke6461]

Oh wow, this sounds interesting. So any recommendations about a portfolio manager that guarantees profits from the stock market with there services?

[@sudeepbattu5525]

0:00 we don't have hydrolic press in our home to repeat this 😂

[@sytian808]

Thank you for this Definitely gonna get the fake and cheaper one

[@pete6705]

Kind of seems crazy to me that someone would buy a fake version of a $120 watch. But I guess a dollar saved is a dollar earned

[@aravarora36]

i love how in the original the glass just popped out

[@CSJiGSaW08]

5:05 - Watch started to go back in time. Maybe hydraulic pressure is the key to time travel LMAO

[@FrozenBusChannel]

It opened up a portal

[@NeO-tt2nh]

Swissarex watches are like a piece of art on your wrist. Ive never seen better craftsmanship.

[@Doomslayer_1818]

KZbin's recommendation is improving!

[@davidhamilton2093]

I'll put my money on the Vostok being the best ... I own 4. Brilliant watches!

[@randomvideos-ol6xt]

who cares of your warch.?

[@acaiPRScapik]

@@randomvideos-ol6xt atleast he choose one of good branded watch... u warch

[@giandujavettorello6184]

If you don't work on a construction site, fake is fine too.

[@NotsoPHYSale]

It's not Unless you absolutely love the watch but can't afford the original then that's also not fine.no to fakes! Also don't encourage them to produce more by buying their products

[@sergioromero1626]

@@NotsoPHYSale la falsificacion no está mal hay personas que no pueden pagar el original que tiene de malo la falsificacion si no quieren que eso pase que hagan más baratos

[@akbone9844]

No to już wiem jak następnym razem rozróżnić w sklepie oryginał od fałszywki 😂❤ dzięki

[@jkbe4ts]

The original G-Shock mirror has is not broken😭 how cool💥💯

[@awiez]

Can u see the difference while scratching original and fake watch? Original 1:22 Fake 1:34

[@aaravsaini8687]

No

[@madnimalek9282]

Me : daddy, I want a G-Shock. Dad: but we don't have a hydraulic press at home.

[@helmyyuanda9047]

Jangan lupa simpan tali jam nya untuk kenang-kenangan, mungkin dimasa mendatang masih bisa digunakan.jujur ini adalah pembuktian yang paling jenius yang pernah saya lihat😁😁😁

[@AlphaeusSim0121]

I hope Casio G-Shock series make a watch that can hydraulic press proof

[@mukulsaraf6351]

Then with some sort of AI , watch can rule the world 😂😂😂

[@bubbaluvv]

i like how the lense said "fuck this, its been fun, im out" on the real G-Shock

[@youreveryfavouriteishere]

Old is gold ✨️ 💛

[@udkr6944]

Creator: Shall we try hydraulic press on G-shock today Glass: none of my business - 3:43

[@aviatorguy007]

I love that 70's watch...pure army jem 👍

[@anshpatel8083]

“G-shock isShockproof” *proceeds to apply constant pressure*

[@ahmadbajwa684]

The fake watch is still compatible and reliable with a price tag of 12$ . Worth to buy

[@puppiesarepower3682]

It hurt seeing that old country watch get destroyed. But I guess it's not authentic, because we all know that in old country watch destroys hydraulic press.

[@user-ji2fm3bt4y]

*My friend gave me a small Rolex watch gussl and to my surprise I realized that it can go with any outfit and look very elegant. I don't use it often, only on special occasions. But it does feel good to know that I have something so special. love it ! *

[@Ingefurly]

The degree of damage of the fake under 157 kg is about the same of the original at 200 kg, not 315.

[@trendzeditz7722]

yes bro you are right

[@dukkitikki5406]

so both are original🛀

[@gregorykapa1153]

What's more interesting is that the fake one lasted a bit longer than the original.

[@djbokasuja]

Gostei que vocês pensaram em responder comentários positivos também, e não só os negativos em vídeos longos.

[@FiredEdits]

Even fake g shock worth 12 $ is not affordable for me 😂😂

[@Deminogg]

But the device and the internet you have to type this comment is? Wild asf my G

[@FiredEdits]

@@Deminogg what 🙄

[@h.b.h.rrawat3862]

lol

[@typerightseesight]

You should have used a triple sensor watch and see if it did anything for barometric pressure

[@Akshaycreativite]

The 70's watch was hard asf

[@caferacer_vdk]

And so, we found out that the hydraulic press works perfectly. But why is there a watch here?

[@dimatha7]

As a huge G fan I cried when I saw the original G being destroyed :'(

[@AngusMurray]

Also the old watch is metal, the real gshock would win in a variety of tests. The crystal on the 70s watch would smash with a face down drop

[@ivanlukic2360]

No. Komandirskie has plexy crystal and is very resilient, won't break in pieces if hit. Much better than glass crystal in that respect. But is much less scratch resistant than glass.

[@ShinwariTuber]

I love how the Fake Hold it for so Long😂😂😂

[@basic2596]

The scratching test be like: This is your watch This is *TURBOFLEX* watch

[@lenux21]

Damn kinda hurt to see that old watch destroyed like that probly made a few watch makers and collectors cry with that but still interesting to see the difference

[@silentstormstudio4782]

To be honest I don't expect my watch to be safe when I myself can't take that much pressure

[@haniyunitasari7973]

Swissarexs dedication to accuracy and detail sets them apart from the competition.

[@HowtoMakeThings]

Who’d have thought that a hydraulic press with tonnes of pressure would decimate a watch? I thought the press would give up like it’s being pushed back by Superman.

[@Toby_B]

Why you destroy the soviet watch?

[@christaufanpangalila1849]

Because that is a communist watch 🤣

[@user-xd3nv2le2o]

​@@christaufanpangalila1849 g shock was destroyed because it is a capitalist watch 😁 2:1

[@VishalG04]

When you already know which one's the fake why destroy it 😂