I Bought A Rolex Submariner For My Collection, But Why?

I bought a Rolex Submariner like everyone else, but why? Let's discuss.
List of References Rolex Submariner: (No Date)
Ref. 5512 - (1959-1980): Cal. 1530, 1560, 1570
Ref. 5513 - (1962-1989): Cal. 1520, 1530
Ref. 14060 - (1990-1998): Cal. 3030
Ref. 14060M - (1998-2012): Cal. 3130
Ref. 114060 - (2012-2020): Cal. 3130 (Super Case)
Ref. 124060 - (2012-2020): Cal. 3230 (41mm)
List of Bond Films and Watches:
1. Dr. No - Rolex Submariner Ref. 6538
2. From Russia with Love - Rolex Submariner Ref. 6538
3. Goldfinger - Rolex Submariner Ref. 6538
4. Thunderball - Breitling Top Time
5. Casino Royale (1967) - Rolex GMT Master
6. You Only Live Twice - Gruen Precision 510
7. On Her Majesty’s Secret Service - Rolex Chronograph Ref. 6238
8. Diamonds Are Forever - Gruen Precision 510
9. Live and Let Die - Rolex Submariner Ref. 5513 & Pulsar LED digital watch
10. The Man with the Golden Gun - Rolex Submariner Ref. 5513
11. The Spy Who Loved Me - Seiko 0674 LC
12. Moonraker - Seiko M354 Memory Bank Calendar
13. For Your Eyes Only - Seiko 7549-7009 & Seiko H357 Duo Display
14. Octopussy - Seiko G757 Sports 100
15. Never Say Again - Unknown Watch
16. A View to a Kill - Seiko 6923-8080 SPD09
17. The Living Daylights - TAG Heuer Professional Night-Dive Reference 980.031
18. Licence to Kill - Rolex Submariner Ref. 16610
19. Goldeneye - Omega Seamaster Professional 300M Ref. 2541.80
20. Tomorrow Never Dies - Omega Seamaster Professional 300M Ref. 2531.80
21. The World is Not Enough - Omega Seamaster Professional 300M Ref. 2531.80
22. Die Another Day - Omega Seamaster Professional 300M Ref. 2531.80
23. Casino Royale - Omega Seamaster Professional 300M Ref. 2220.80.00
24. Quantum of Solace - Omega Seamaster Planet Ocean Ref. 2201.50.00
25. Skyfall - Omega Seamaster Planet Ocean Ref. 232.30.42.21.01.001
26. Spectre - Omega Seamaster 300 Ref. 233.32.31.41.21.01.001
27. No Time to Die - OMEGA Seamaster 300 Series 007 Edition

[@Dr_LK]

3:26 is not the Parthenon (which is at the acropolis in Athens Greece), but is the Pantheon in Rome!

[@jtullyil]

Perhaps you could fix this error post-production

[@Brimful22]

Please do correct it, it may harm future generations that see this video and get it wrong for ever

[@pulsefg]

@@Brimful22 Yes, I agree. Should be corrected as it’s rather unfortunate. Why bring it up at all if you don’t know it.

[@etebol]

Just the fact he efed that up, reinforces my idea that anybody with a paycheck wanting status gets a Rolex.

[@kleitosaliagas5668]

Yes, big difference and a relatively common mistake, but should definitely be corrected. Ironically, he could have used an image of the actual Parthenon to make the same point.

[@WatchesBeAwesome]

The no-date looks so much cleaner. Definitely my favorite!

[@ugabrew]

The cyclops was an interesting attempt for improving legibility, but the execution was never great and I think it makes every watch that has one look worse.

[@jeririce4928]

it’s more boring though and less functional

[@desireless4092]

@@jeririce4928 Ironically it's more functional and less cumbersome. I pick my Sub, I set the time and I go. That's it. Especially on NATO and rubber straps it is really fun. Now it might be boring for people who are not really into watches. They think they are, but they're not. They are more interested in the recognition hence why the cyclops is requested most of the time or the [insert shiny color] type. Because people will know you wear a Rolex (or Paganmi ). I don't have to worry when I bang him here and there for fear of scratching the cyclops. Worth nothing that most of my watches have no date. I just love certain aspects of this watch and like I said - people who are NOT really into watches but more as a fashion statement and resell value will not understand.

[@Matt-uq3in]

With out The cyclops wort it's pure class 😎🔥

[@fj7509]

The Submariner 124060 might just be the greatest Rolex ever made. The slimmer lugs, thicker bracelet, and upgraded clasp support the watch perfectly in comparison to the previous generation. And this is coming from someone with a 5.9 inch wrist. That should speak volumes to its comfort on so many wrists.

[@saadm5732]

ngl my issue with it is, everyone thinks it fake but at the same time living in London, risk of getting robbed at knife point

[@PyroClit]

same as the daytona. If someone is wearing one, there is always a question if its fake or not.

[@Casa1000]

Why do you care if people think it’s fake?

[@fj7509]

@@Casa1000 People are insecure and need others to know they're a special watch collector. I own a Black Ceramic 124060 and could give a rodent's posterior if people think it's fake. The slimmer lugs, thicker bracelet, and upgraded clasp support the watch perfectly in comparison to the previous generation. And this is coming from someone with a 5.9 inch wrist. This reference might be the greatest Rolex ever made. Rolex has now perfected it IMO.

[@Czeron01]

Why is London so dangerous? I keep hearing that and am surprised.

[@PyroClit]

@@Czeron01 A lot of mugging in recent years. They specifically target people with luxury watches.

[@jcaccord]

The P39 you had is the perfect daily wearer version with the lightweight ti and the sub is the “garage queen” that you admire and smile at.

[@wristopia4101]

P39 is a lovely watch, but a bit small for me to wear. The new Sub and Explorer are definitely the two top GADA watches IMO.

[@rnunez70681]

I agree with you 💯%, the newer subs (114060, 124060) are too heavy and uncomfortable for everyday, the 14060M is a much better choice, just like the P39. And with the P39 you don't have to worry about babying the thing.

[@rnunez70681]

@@wristopia4101 You must be, and I don't mean this in a bad way, a younger dude or a dude with very thick wrists. Dudes in our 40s like me usually prefer the 5 digitg cases, much lighter and more refined than the 6 digit models, that's what we bought a long time ago and fell in love with, even with my 8.25 in wrist I still prefer the late 90s early 2000s pieces.

[@wristopia4101]

@@rnunez70681 Haha, no not young. Have a vintage Seadweller which is tiny now. I have a 19cm/7.5" wrist and tend to prefer 40 or 41mm with 21mm lug width. It was interesting that the P39 was the first 21mm lug widthTudor, and I feel that's why it looks so good, so the new Sub will look much better than say the GMT dimensions in me I think. I am not too affected by weight either way (do not find Pelagos that light feeling anyway) but prefer the weight of steel. Each to their own though ; )

[@rnunez70681]

@@wristopia4101 I think they did 21mm lug width to make the lugs themselves thinner and more refined, the Sub however has a thicker and heavier case with pronounced crown guards, and the 21mm lug width does not resolve the visual proportions of the case. Don't even get me started on the GMT, that's the one professional model that should never have received the maxi case treatment.

[@004NA400]

3 and a half years for a sub is crazy

[@twoedc4202]

Yes, but nowadays you see people on reddit walking in ADs and out with subs and explorers. Market has changed.

[@wolfbrockman3357]

​@@twoedc4202 Proof that it's all smoke and mirrors and artificially scarcity, and anyone who subjects themselves to that is a consumerist fool with no self-respect. If I walk into a Rolex store and they treat me poorly and put me on a list, I'll tell them to go f*** themselves and gladly purchase any other of the dozens of quality watch brands out there. Also the Rolex Submariner is one of the most boring overrated watches on the planet and most people buy it because they're unimaginative unoriginal boring generic people with no interesting tastes.

[@anthonyb2990]

@@twoedc4202idk about that lol, I’m still on the waitlist.. it’s been 6 months.

[@Jaxon-r3u]

Yeah. I did not even put my name on the list the my ad said he cam get it in few months. So the market is not thd same as 2 years ago

[@abdulkhaliqabubakar1033]

@@Jaxon-r3uwow, that’s awesome. Which AD? In Asia, my AD told me - if you’re lucky, in 8 years!! 😢

[@stevemoreno6241]

Congrats on getting it at retail. You do sound super stoked.

[@danemehring1029]

Congrats on the pickup! I can definitely tell that you’ve upped your video production 😎 Now you recently made a video about a 7 watch rotation…do you plan on selling one to fit that criteria?

[@Thesupermanning]

It’s funny. Some folks start out wanting a Rolex sub. They go on a circuitous route of other watches for a few years, calling themselves watch enthusiasts as they madly flip. Then they finally get their Sub, which is what they actually craved all along. If Rolex would just sell Submariners to everyone who wants them, I think we would have far fewer watch enthusiasts.

[@fj7509]

So sad how the top comment of this video is someone criticizing the owner instead of being happy for him. Well said.

[@esteban6302]

So true

[@Werman20]

I got the new no date sub and I love it 100% but it gave me the itch for a gmt master 2 and now I have the batgirl as well. 😂 my justification is that at least the bracelets are oystersteel and jubilee respectively, also no date sub but cyclops on the batgirl, and just a hint of color (blue) on the batgirl so depending on my outfit or mood I go back and forth. Of course the third player is my blue dial white gold fluted bezel 41mm datejust with the oystersteel bracelet if I want to dress up a notch. I’ve had breitlings, omegas, Tudor, panerai, etc but I sold them all and consolidated to just my 3 watch collection and now the itch has finally been scratched. Apologies if this comes off as pretentious, but the point I’m making is that I understand the feeling he had about having other watches that just reminded you of what you really want instead. I’m very fortunate to be able to even have any of these and it took years of saving and watching the market so when it finally came down from the peak in 2022, I had to strike. And honestly one of the biggest selling points for me was the 70 hours on all 3 watches I have now. My Tudor black bay was the only one that came close to that, which makes sense obviously.

[@rxl77]

Kinda a profound observation.

[@Thesupermanning]

@@fj7509 I’m reading my comment again now, and I feel kind of bad for writing it. Part of me is actually happy for him. The other part of me still feels salty for reasons I can’t express well. I watched him flip a ton of watches over the years and it makes me reflect on my own “watch journey” and I feel bad for the similar journey I am on. He ends up with a bunch of Rolexes like many other KZbinrs. I’ve never owned a Rolex, on perhaps misplaced “principle”. I could sell a few of my watches and buy one. But Maybe I don’t actually care about watches. Maybe if I got a polar Explorer I would end up on a similar route and end up with three more Rolexes before too long . Maybe my twenty years of watch enthusiasm were in vain. Maybe I’m kidding myself. Maybe I should just get a Rolex. I truly don’t know anymore. 🤷‍♂️ what is this world coming to.

[@hoarsefly6066]

Congrats! Enjoy it! Regarding your preference for thinner lugs and 20mm lug width, the SD4K appears to check all your boxes, plus it has a matte dial & cyclops-less date complication…

[@ImperiousRex241]

Congrats on acquiring the sub! Another point is the sub is a great legacy watch that can be passed to family through the years. Hope you have many years of enjoyment.

[@wall269]

Great pickup, congrats ! What were you alluding to when you mentioned the versatility of the bezel / ability to change looks (similar to the 16710)? I picked up a 126610LV last year and love it as a daily. I’ve looked into adding a black OEM bezel insert / setup for added versatility, but everything I’ve read / watched has said this process is pretty high risk in addition to being tough to source genuine bezels (for a reasonable price). Would be curious to hear your plan / strategy around this!

[@ryanroe7]

Great video. You captured the core of what makes this watch iconic, especially the marketing genius of the brand. I have a 14060, but can’t deny I like the new one. Congrats!

[@dec1aim_flow432]

Please, the Parthenon is not a Roman building but the Greek absolute Iconique temple in Athens that inspired the rest. As an analogy, you could say that the design you are talking about is recognisable as the Invicta we all know and love.

[@thegraciefighter102]

I have a no date submariner and just think it’s still the definitive dive watch. It’s classic and wears exceptionally well. I don’t see many people at all wearing one though.

[@key4duty]

I see a lot of people wearing the sub date, it seems the no date version is much more rare. I like the symmetry of it and such a shame they don’t make them in other colors like the sub date.

[@thegraciefighter102]

That’s a great point - wish they made no date in other bezel colours. I wonder why they don’t

[@WornDownCrown]

Congrats on the new Sub Harrison. I got mine last June and it’s the crown jewel of my collection, I absolutely love it. May you wear yours in good health.

[@Emach76]

The Roman Pantheon was built around 25 A.D. and was built in the same manner and to copy the architecture of the Greek Parthenon which was built in 432 (ish) B.C. So our buildings here in the US are built like the ancient Greek buildings.

[@corgiowner436]

The Pantheon is in Rome. The PaRthenon is in Athens.

[@Emach76]

@@corgiowner436 yea but Harrison said Parthenon

[@isaacc154]

We got the idea of what he was trying to say nevertheless.

[@Kilimanjahro]

@@isaacc154 still wrong though, and thats how knowledge gets lost to future generations (kinda like how rumours work ;-) )

[@Emach76]

@@Kilimanjahro exactly

[@JVDM1076]

Great vid, I like how you talked about the lineup history AND the marketing which made Rolex so special

[@nicolatramontano5899]

Omega speedmaster 3861 and role submariner 124069 what is your grail watch ?

[@ridgeracer2810]

Most iconic watch ever made. Period. If you love timepieces this is a must own.

[@robertp5123]

Classic watch! The no date Rolex Sub is a stunning timepiece. I hope you enjoy it for many years and hopefully pass it down. I was able to get the same one in early 2023. I guess it was my lucky day. I had a special birthday coming up and I told him that I wanted the no date sub. He went to the vault and came back with it. Happy birthday to me!!

[@famosguider205]

Congratulations! Your sub earned you a new sub! I’ve been watching you for some time not realizing I haven’t subbed until now. We are all sub brothers! Lol

[@analoguestills]

For the history, design, robustness and branding, the Submariner is the best watch in that price range. This is coming from an Omega fan who has both the Green Seamaster and Speedmaster. When I got my 114060 Submariner, it felt levels ahead of my Seamaster in terms of classiness and feel, which was shocking because I thought it would feel exactly the same given how great Omega watches are. The only downside of the modern Submariner is the clasp. Why is it so damn large and thick? Haha. Congratulations on your new acquisition.

[@harrychristoforou6089]

Do you have both the explorer and submariner? Is there space in your collection for both and why?

[@stagglee]

they are two completely different watches (relatively speaking). different design/function/era. I have the same two

[@ThisGuy41722]

1:02 and you have to pause it exactly on that. Is there rust forming between the crystal and the bezel? You can see orange/red specs in the space because of the high level zoom and clarity of the camera. I doubt anyone can notice something like this with their naked eye, but you certainly can in this video. Id love to know people’s opinion on this.

[@michaelriera6277]

More like wrist cheese

[@iggysmeralda2930]

Just got my 126610LV. Good choice and congrats. I had the explorer 2 and a 126610LN. At the end of the day, there’s a reason it’s so popular.

[@nikouai]

I spent 3 years with the exact same watch. And what I found is that I still like how it looks, but 9 out of 10 times, I go for my BB58 or some other lighter and more comfortable option… I put the Sub on a rubber strap, but really am fan of bracelets. So my Tudors and Sinn 356 (and a couple of others) take all the wrist time

[@lendlneil]

Your whole tone and way you’re talking shows how super stoked you are at getting it. As an owner of the 116610, I still would have kept the P39. The thing about the sub is everyone thinks it’s fake but still rob you for it. I can’t stand the aura behind that watch.

[@mrlong6267]

I own a Squale 1545 in Smurf blue and I love it. Still on the waitlist for a no date sub or one with a green bezel but not sure when I will ever get the call….cheers!

[@bernal4444]

That’s a crazy wait time but congrats on getting it! I got mine last year and love it. I got the date version as to me ir went perfect with my Nttd Seamaster. It does have some heft to it but the bracelet having micro adjust makes it perfect.

[@DDWGG1]

Hope you talk about the buying process in another video. Would love to hear how you kept yourself on your ADs radar for 3 years.

[@dazlarg]

I don’t think I’ve heard you so Animated or excited when reviewing or talking about a watch… this was always my grail when I was a young boy however the whole risky stays of wearing one over in the uk these days tarnishes the thought of wearing one to enjoy, and also there is so much stigma attached to the sub that I’m afraid it’s lost its glamour for me now .. as I crave proper tool watches that still exude its purpose not its status and I’m now leaning toward the 40mm explorer to that end. I have several Tudor divers that are proper tools and omit the shiny bezels and polish and by default are attractive to Me. All that said the sub is still a beautiful iconic watch but sadly for me at least gives me All the wrong vibes.

[@fj7509]

As an owner of a new 36mm Explorer, I want to be honest with you and say I don't rate the watch at all. I tried using it as an excuse for satisfying my desire for a Submariner 124060, and I still ended up getting the Submariner a few months later. There's nothing wrong with the Explorer. It just doesn't speak to me. I would just end up purchasing an Oyster Perpetual with the money, or if I can't get that, I would have gotten a Grand Seiko.

[@BlondeDavey]

Great video. I’ve been into the watch hobby since 2010. My first Rolex was Explorer 2 16570. Since then I have owned Rolex, Omega, Tudor, JLC, IWC, Grand Seiko and other more affordable brands. My favourite watch over this period was a 1991 14060 Sub with Tritium dial. Unfortunately my OCD brain told me it was too polished, not original with hands and bezel, so I sold it. My most recent purchase is this 214060 Sub. It has all the appeal of the vintage Sub with modern improvements. It keeps perfect time and the dial pops due to AR coating. In my opinion not only the best Rolex, but best all-round watch ever made. Enjoy yours for many years to come.

[@eddyliu5194]

You spoke a lot faster than you normally do in your previous videos, is it because of the excitement?

[@tylerjames676]

A timeless design that has been imitated countless times, and is the benchmark for a diver, in my opinion. Beautiful watch, I am happy for you!

[@rons9067]

Um, because it is probably the most iconic watch ever made. It doesn’t hurt the it is also a contender for best GADA watch ever. Congrats on an amazing piece of horological history.

[@wristopia4101]

You beat me to saying that lol 😉 I do not have one yet (long story) but having just got an Explorer and am wondering if that is actually the best GADA?

[@kaczynski2333]

No, it's really not in the running for best GADA; that would be G Shock.

[@martinskowronek]

Na it’s the sub I wear one all day everyday (gym, beach, I work in insulation/drywall). G shocks are great but def not gada

[@kaczynski2333]

@martinskowronek great, a watch that only tells the time is not "do anything"; and that's ignoring that it's a scratch magnet with exposed crystal. And the bit where your watch stops running, so you have to reset and wind. Are you sure you know what GADA means? Care to guess how many special forces guys are in the field wearing Rolex?

[@kaczynski2333]

I wear G Shock or Garmin when it matters; everything else is jewellery.

[@Prime182]

The common look of dive watches is due to certain ISO standards that it needs to be able to be called a dive watch

[@deadlypredator3]

What is your wrist size?

[@Milofchg]

Congrats!!!!! Amazing watch!!!! I'm on the fence between getting the no-date Sub 41mm or the 2014-2017 40mm ceramic SeaDweller 116600 for a few thousand bucks more (no waitlist, smaller size than the supercase 40mm Subs). I would like to see a Speedy vs Sub vs Explorer 36mm comparison. Also curious to see the 41mm Sub on a leather strap, or NATO. Looks like you have all watches checked off, dress, diver, chrono, dress, affordable, digital, Japanese watches. My perfect collection would be 36mm Explorer, the Speedy Pro, 41mm Sub no date, Reverso small seconds mono face, Patek Calatrava 5196, Patek Perpetual Calendar 5140.

[@justingalore123]

I had one and liked it - but not as much as: either a modern Tudor Pelagos or a vintage Tudor sub! The square indices and extra toolyness do it for me!

[@hzt7000]

If you feel this watch is expensive, do not lust after it. Concentrate on getting on in your life to a point that this watch is just another affordable wrist accessory.

[@pulsefg]

I always find the clasp configuration that people chose interesting: Have you tried going for 4 links on the 6-o-clock side?

[@RedWolf5]

You can’t ever get bored looking at such an amazing piece. These watches are truly stunning!

[@BoscoRedBob]

I bought one in 2008 for around $4800. I have worn it, as well as other Rolex watches every since then. For me, it is not about prices going up or down or what other people think. It is the simple fact that I buy them because they make me happy. I enjoy wearing them and looking at them and I love the mechanical craftsmanship.

[@corgiowner436]

Wow 3.5 years waiting! I’m too old to do that.

[@simonwright6882]

Great video and delivery Harrison! Congrats on buying an icon.

[@caseyzaft6734]

Where did you buy that Rolex book?

[@HarrisonElmore]

Amazon! The place for everything haha

[@kpmcclellan]

had one for over 8 months and sold it ... got tired of wearing the same thing as everyone else ... decided I'm not into being one of the crowd, but then again I'm an architect/designer and my job is to make NEW things, not copy other work.

[@BPFnSC]

I’ve had mine for around the same time. I’m with you about it being prolific and a little boring. On the other hand, I like that it’s a classic and will never sell it. But I am looking at other brands like Grand Seiko to be a little different than the crowd.

[@Kilimanjahro]

Switch to the FF, i did. Funny how that looks like s "modern" diver to the generations of today.

[@Nakkisampyla]

It's like 1st gen Mustang, every car enthusiast has one. BORING

[@jeririce4928]

all of your work is derivative, I guarantee

[@Soulheads-yy3zq]

I’ve been wearing my 124060 for a year and will always enjoy it. It fits perfectly with my personality and style and it’s really a watch that you make your own. Definitely not for everyone.

[@dean5346]

The non date Rolex sub is an iconic watch. The glide lock clasp is amazing on the new submariners. 3 and a half years is a long wait for the no date sub. I went for the Starbucks which I picked up in Feb 24.i waited about 2 years and 7 months. It’s the mark 2 dial, which I prefer over the mark 1. Which is basically the hulk bezel. Congratulations on your non date sub, enjoy.

[@Kanvar010]

Thanks for the great review! The overall weight and lug width are giving me second thoughts, notwithstanding that it is a classic great watch!

[@mattl165]

Great video. Thanks for all the history and insights. However, you referenced the Parthenon but showed a picture of the Pantheon.

[@danny6825]

Got this watch in December. It’s been my daily watch ever since. Absolutely love it. Enjoyed this video.

[@Watch_Papa]

Wait they’ll sell you different color bezels?

[@ralstonjosephrj]

I've always wanted a Submariner- at first I wanted a no-date Subbie because of the symmetry. Hoping in the future I can add it to my collection. Congratulations on your timepiece! Enjoy!

[@David_10157]

Congrats! Beautiful watch and great dimensions. I bought a Submariner 14060m a few months back and I don't want to say the honeymoon period is over, but I recently bought a Seamaster 2254.50 (Peter Blake) so on any given day, one of them is my go-to. Unfortunately my 16570 hasn't been on the wrist for around 6 months now.

[@gavinwhite9743]

First if all congrats, stunning watch. I own my 14060m no date…and love it. I am currently wearing it on a rubberb strap, which makes it very comfortable in summer. Brings a pleasing aesthetic too. It may be common, but it's also classic, ageless and a Rolex. You can wear it with anything or activity, and it just works. To be fair, it's just my daily beater, but it does that effortlessly.

[@gislisnbjornsson690]

Love it - have the exact same watch on order. Have a sneaky feeling that I will not need to wait that long

[@user-wv5hb7lb6w]

What’s your wrist size ?

[@johna797]

I’ve just been offered a 124060 as well as a Speedmaster 321 (having just sold my 3861 Hesalite). I’m slightly torn, two very different watches obviously and the 321 is a few grand more.. but it’s more discreet, seems a bit more special?

[@michaelriera6277]

Tell your AD that your dear friend Mike would like to purchase the Sub and you will buy the Speedy. Then let me know when to pickup the Sub from the AD and we can both go grab drinks afterwards to celebrate wearing our spanking new watches! There that’s what you should do.

[@johna797]

@@michaelriera6277 😂😂😂

[@rnunez70681]

I knew you were going to mention the weight!!! Although I really want a (no date) Sub it is my main deterrent againts the 124060. I, like you, am used to the 120-130 grams weight of the 5 digit models and the slimmer case/lugs, therefore I still think the 4 liner 14060M may be a better future choice for me but for now I'm happy with my 16570 Polar. Can't weight for the next video comparing this 124060 to the 5 digit models!!

[@brian91145]

The explorer 1 is just perfect

[@michaelriera6277]

Have you actual worn the Explorer 1 36mm? The new one 124270 I so wanted to love the watch. I loved the history and look of the watch, timeless elegance. I got the call from the AD and it looked perfect on me at the AD it was prefect. After 7 months I sold it I just couldn’t get used to how diminutive it wore on my wrist and the severe 14mm taper just never felt right. Too bad because I always thought that would’ve been my one and done.

[@kaczynski2333]

So buy a Nivada Grenchen, Super Antarctic.

[@Malagon194]

​@michaelriera6277 have you tried the 114270?

[@basketballfan4eva]

@@michaelriera6277 Had the same feeling as you and ended up going for the larger 40mm 224270. But sometimes I do feel like 40mm is too big for an explorer... Meanwhile the current 124270 is most definitely too small and dainty. Wish they made the explorer in 38mm, that would be perfect!

[@michaelriera6277]

I have not as this is not a model available at an AD.

[@Mackster248]

Congrats! Looks great. I prefer the SMP, I have the 2254.50, as it just looks so unique and I love the Omega branding. But a fluted DateJust would be by dream Rolex. Hopefully one day.

[@redauwg911]

that's a beautiful Omega watch

[@demi9843]

( I realize now it might be a fake I did a little research on it but I don't care just something I'd still get fixed would still love some advice on it though) Would love some advice about it I just got my grandpa's old one it hasn't worked in awhile been looking to get it repaired it's in good condition but the clip is the only part that isn't Mine is a stainless steel oyster perpetual date it also has a japan movt on the bottom and blue inside Not watch person but I'd like to know when it was made

[@Maxlazona]

Another point to add to the list is that a Submariner, like many Rolex models, is among the least expensive watches to own in the long run. If the original purchaser bought the Submariner at retail, they can enjoy it for many years. By maintaining it in good condition, they could potentially resell it for more than what they initially paid.

[@JohnHeos-no1hg]

You pretty much summed up why I like a Tudor, the remind me of a time when they were well crafted tool watches. I have no desire to own a Rolex, they are too much bling, too shiny. I’m perfectly happy with a Tudor gmt and a Pelagos. To each is their own

[@chriscoleman2724]

I really want a EXPLORER II AND SUBMARINER don’t know why because like you say everyone has them but it’s something about them 2 watches that does something for me great video

[@emg1233]

I've always wanted a submariner but after getting my Explorer I think its largely scratched the itch for me. I still wouldn't mind getting one someday but I think it will be an older 5 digit model

[@Werman20]

Honestly that’s a solid pick too. Good for you

[@ElectricShadowsZone]

Thanks for your video on the Submariner. By the way, the second building image was actually the Pantheon and not the Parthenon.

[@pkoster5874]

I have no problems at all waiting a few years for a Rolex, my trouble is that they show me the door without even give me the chance to wait (I have a small buying history at that AD with an Omega AT)

[@wheelsandwatches]

Never have so many people owned a watch that is so hard to buy 🤪 Glad you are happy with it and enjoy.

[@singflorent]

Nice Harrison your Rolex collection starting to slowly grow lol 😊

[@rickyromano6659]

Congratulations! In my opinion it is the closest thing to a perfect watch. Being good in pretty much any scenario it's maybe a little boring, but for me, if I could only have one watch, it would be a black bezel sub.

[@sinjinadams2862]

The no-date Sub has been and always will be the best looking watch of all time!

[@mrkattm]

I have a 2004 Submariner Date that I have had service twice now (by an authorized dealer), both complete overhauls that cost over $1000.00 each time (ouch) I definitely need to start taking better care of it. My point being is that I wear it as an everyday watch so it gets a ton of scratches but the good news is that when you send it in for service they buff right out.

[@kirkbickley3505]

Congrats mate on finally getting the call!!

[@fdlqfdlq]

Congrats. You deserve the best. I got the same watch. It was available so I got it with no waiting! Im so lucky 😊

[@Howard24]

A good analogy to the submariner I think would be the Mercedes G Wagon. It became iconic because of its capabilities before it became a status symbol, yet to this day, it is still capable of doing what it was originally designed to do. Just like how the submariner is still just as capable as a tool watch as it is as a status symbol.

[@Valera_Scotland]

It is iconic, but I'm personally taking a step back. I've had the Speedy 3 times, Aqua Terra twice, IWC, and others.... I've found a Smiths PRS-29A... that's all i own now (apart from my G shock) it is like what a rolex was decades ago. A little bit like the Explorer.... small, beautifully proportioned, hassle free with brushed surfaces, manual wind... for £400 i am very happy. I'm not sure if i can bring myself to spend 10k on a watch any time soon, and this little Smiths is more fun to wear than anything I've owned, because it reflects the time when watches were tools. I had the same feeling when i owned Hamilton watches... at this stage, I'm sick of hype, wait lists and extortionate prices.... that's just me ❤

[@Time_Passages]

My father always wanted a Sub. He got his back in 1979. I always wanted a Sub. Have been on the waitlist for quite some time. I think it is the watch that all others would like to be. I could say the same about Ferraris.

[@Greektourguide]

Congrats on getting the Sub at retail! I own a 16710 and it is indeed like having 3 watches in 1

[@nujabe]

This was a great review, I’ve owned this watch for two years now it’s my only watch and you pretty much explained it all! It’s such a good watch it does what it needs to do.

[@christopherng7304]

Congratulations on the Sub! 🎉

[@wristopia4101]

How does this affect that 7 watch/one per day without 5 watch winders BS?

[@michaelriera6277]

The man has two wrists

[@caseyzaft6734]

The date complication doesn’t belong on the Sub, smart purchase.

[@SickStyle201]

Excitedly got the call today, 4 years to the day I got put on the waitlist (wanted it to celebrate the birth of my first daughter)

[@dannyg6592]

Congratulations, it is a true icon among watches and a superb time piece with a very strong link to past Submariners. I have that same model. Wear and enjoy!

[@afuentesalburo]

My submariner changes personality with every change of strap (I bring 5 colors when I’m on a business trip), and yes, the 21 mm are a pity, but… it’s new, enjoy it!

[@metro2171]

Love the aesthetic of this iconic watch design. This watch design will transcend generations . I never concern my self with what other people are wearing . A lot of people owns this watch for a valid reason . The one you own belongs to you It was purchased with your hard earn money therefore it’s unique to you and no one else. The sub Is an authentic Icon that’s timeless more importantly it has value retention and brand equity. Winner winner

[@imranchowdhury4972]

Before owning a sub, many KZbinrs crisitisez Rolex watches. But right after they own it, the smile on their face is seeable. Suddenly, Submariner becomes the best watch in the world!!!!!

[@siddhant46s54]

The Rolex Submariner 124060 is divers watch perfection personified, they have absolutely nailed the proportions with the last design updates in 2020 , looks so much better than the 114060 looks like a square popsicle on a stick compared to this . Love the 124060 and hope to buy it sometime in the future soon .

[@AZadeh-nd8vx]

Really great review, and i love your intelligent comparisons to the Pantheon and Government buildings etc Ive had ny Submariner (date) for 4 months now and it hasn't left my wrost for a day. No other watches get any wrist time

[@kleitosaliagas5668]

Yaaaaa... Except he called it the Parthenon, so maybe not that intelligent after all.

[@fabienponchard2220]

outstanding ! Stunning watch. I personnaly prefer the prior ceramic ones but all subs are beautiful

[@waxy954]

No date Sub. Great choice. Congratulations…enjoy!

[@v.s.4948]

Wow this was a masterpiece!! And can't wait for the diving video of the Sub!! Congrats on that beautiful piece!

[@michaelwarren4122]

Anyone else think that the waitlist times have been coming down? I put my name on a AD list for a Submariner 126613LN on February 10, 2024 and got a call May 13, 2024 that the watch arrived. Picked it up on the 14th.

[@martinkaplan1805]

Terrific review! Thank you. Appreciate your content as well as your presentation style.

[@taotzu1339]

The thing I don't get is this: If everybody wants a Rolex, then why the hell are there so many used after market watches floating around out there? You'd think that once you got yours, you'd be good and satisfied such that you won't part from it until someone pries it from your cold dead wrist or they bury you with it.

[@TobiasHenreich]

3:34 Sir it is the Pantheon! The Parthenon is in Greece.

[@theraddadinvestor1000]

the weight you'll get use to it, not bad at all.

[@desireless4092]

I have this 124060 and Saphire Speedy 3861. Basically reached my peak desire of owning legends and 2 grails