Games : Silent Hill 2 - 0:34 God of War: Ragnarök - 1:37 Hogwarts Legacy - 2:30 CYBERPUNK 2077 - 3:11 Ghost of Tsushima - 4:19 Forza Horizon 5 - 5:26 Starfield - 6:36 Microsoft Flight Simulator - 7:38 Red Dead Redemption 2 - 8:39 Horizon Forbidden West - 9:48 System: Windows 11 Core i3-14100F - bit.ly/420c9K8 ASUS ROG Strix Z790-E Gaming - bit.ly/3scEZpc 32Gb RAM DDR5 6000MHz - bit.ly/3BOxlni Intel i7 9700K - bit.ly/2DpYKnG Asus ROG Strix Z390-F Gaming - bit.ly/34Vop2L 32Gb RAM DDR4 3600Mhz - bit.ly/2YmtsEA CPU Cooler - be quiet! Dark Rock Pro 4 - bit.ly/35G5atV GeForce RTX 4090 24GB - bit.ly/3CSaMCj SSD - 2xSAMSUNG 970 EVO M.2 2280 1TB - bit.ly/2NmWeQe Power Supply CORSAIR RM850i 850W - bit.ly/3i2VoGI
@fungame81172 ай бұрын
6 years and i7 in terms of productivity at the same level as i3
@MakeSh00t2 ай бұрын
5x6 years u get old.
@vovapapi-sk2zg2 ай бұрын
i7 9700K GOOD CPU
@karan83542 ай бұрын
Well actually 5
@AntiGrieferGames2 ай бұрын
Except efficiency
@chovekb2 ай бұрын
Gaming is not really productivity.
@ur_cristiano_007-s3n2 ай бұрын
50% lower power usage + 3 times cheaper decent+ 5% extra performance is not that bad for i3
@Knoah3212 ай бұрын
Not only that, but he is using a $90 CPU cooler to keep the 9th gen i7 nice and chill. Since he didn't mention a cooler for the 14th gen i3, I would assume he is using a stock cooler.
@LEGEND-rt9zc2 ай бұрын
@@kingwarrior8098 it is , do the math lol
@adlibconstitution16092 ай бұрын
@@kingwarrior8098 pause at 3:41 i3 = 53w and i7 = 82w. That is 50% or more.
@LEGEND-rt9zc2 ай бұрын
@@kingwarrior8098 its sad someone had to do the math for you. Its just embarrassing at this point for you to act like this.
@Jkro-zi5dq2 ай бұрын
4 cores in 2025💀💩
@youcef124002 ай бұрын
High end cpus we have known become budget skus......... technology advance is cruel
@AlfaPro13372 ай бұрын
Meanwhile, AMD sells a glorified low end 6c for US$300 for years!!!
@m8x4252 ай бұрын
The 1% lows languish a lot with the 14100f. More often than not they're flat out lower or they're not in proportion to the 9700k. This is really a sample of what Alder Lake can do and its IPC + L2 cache prowess in comparison to a Skylake refresh CPU (14100f is not a true RPL chip).
@lnxextreme62752 ай бұрын
Got 9700k since launch, still strong tho! Mostly on 1440p and 1600p
@BravoSixGoingDark2 ай бұрын
i7 4790k user here since Dec 2014. Going to upgrade soon. Actually i am forced to because my Z97 motherboard is having funny problems (e.g. PCIE slots causes GPU to crash).
@culixul2 ай бұрын
upgrade to ryzen, way better @@BravoSixGoingDark
@m8x4252 ай бұрын
@@BravoSixGoingDark have you tried testing with a different GPU or tried the GPU in another system? One time I helped a guy who thought his motherboard was DOA, but it turned out to be the CPU, and that was a 6700k.
@BravoSixGoingDark2 ай бұрын
@@m8x425 Yes, tried all the troubleshooting methods, even went down to a repair shop to test my GPU. Came back okay.
@despairdx2 ай бұрын
@@BravoSixGoingDarkthe problem is either with cpu or mobo
@selohcin2 ай бұрын
It's good to see that a Core i3 from 2024 can match a Core i7 from 2018.
@Goreck652 ай бұрын
9700k is still not bad at all
@despairdx2 ай бұрын
Not considering the price 🗣️🗣️🗣️🗣️
@juanme555Ай бұрын
@@despairdx its 70U$D used in my country, the 14100F is 100$ used and i'd have to buy a new motherboard because im on a z390 motherboard with an i3 9100 right now 🤷🏻♂
@mathverickacevedo6633Ай бұрын
@@juanme555 Si pasas del i3 al i7 notarás un gran cambio.
@ogaimon338016 күн бұрын
@@juanme555 crazy country man,even the i7 8700 is much higher than that where i live,i5 12400f is 100dollars and beat all
@baoquoc37102 ай бұрын
Where the 9700K will shine is literally utilizing higher end gpus. 8 cores will still provide less stutters and bottlenecks at highly cpu intensive tasks or scenes
@ExteremeDog9 күн бұрын
i got the i7 9700k with a RTX 2080Ti .. i dont really find any issues with games .. worse case scenario DLSS balance sorts it all out..
@jackarrows14362 ай бұрын
Hello Man, Can you try to testing Monitors PC Gaming 4k refresh rate 144hz to 240hz?
@ClayWheeler2 ай бұрын
That's impossible to do on KZbin because KZbin is limited to 60 FPS anyway.
@jackarrows14362 ай бұрын
@@ClayWheeler what? Are you Serious? Compare only Aio Monitors PC ips Va... OLED
@ClayWheeler2 ай бұрын
@@jackarrows1436 and how's exactly the comparison supposed to be uploaded to KZbin if KZbin itself cannot deliver beyond 60 FPS? Both 144hz and 240hz will look exactly the same once it's uploaded to KZbin. Ever heard about Video Compression?
@jackarrows14362 ай бұрын
@@ClayWheeler Not this, i told ...but a test report 🧟♂️🧟🧟♀️
@BMAChannel.Ай бұрын
@@jackarrows1436This guy is a benchmarking youtuber and you ask him to test monitors? lmao
@robertvogel4056Ай бұрын
Playing games 1080p on 4090 and 9700K is not OC to 5ghz is waste of time. If you are on old build like 9700K, OC it to 5ghz and play 2K, 4K res if you have 4070-4090 or 3080-3090 you see no bottleneck worth enough to upgrade. The GPU becomes the bottleneck.
@Lexzx2 ай бұрын
Почему нельзя было поставить частоту оперативной памяти на 14100F как у 9700k? 6000>3600
@ghostbuster23392 ай бұрын
С добрым утром, на рынке уже 4 года как ddr5 присутствует
@TomCruiseArbuz2 ай бұрын
Всё просто, 9700k не работает с ddr5. Отвечая на ваш вопрос, 3600 - одна из стандартных рабочих частот для ddr4 и до 6000 память не разогнать. Кстати, тесты показывают что между ddr4 3600 и ddr5 6000 нет большой разницы
@Lexzx2 ай бұрын
@@SilvãoOldGamer 14100f не работает с DDR4 что ли? Почему нельзя было вставить DDR4 на 3600? Чтобы тест был более честный, мы же тут не память тестируем
@stickergamer2 ай бұрын
Me: **Cries in i7 7700K**
@Schneiderhahn2 ай бұрын
Das ist doch Unsinn. In Hogwarts Legacy und Cyberpunk schaffen beide CPUs nicht mal 60 fps? Hat man die Taktrate beschnitten oder den Turbo deaktiviert?
@haliderdogan20052 ай бұрын
Can you show the average fps of the games at the end of each of your videos?
@Shonade_Malik2 ай бұрын
Intel Core i3 is a quad core god.
@guguelino152 ай бұрын
Aqui no Brasil é uma Raridade encontrar um I7 desse. Antigo, porém, muito bom.
@P0werINC.2 ай бұрын
8 physical cores are better, this is visible when both processors are loaded at 100%
@culixul2 ай бұрын
not necesarilly, i3's cores are faster and has more performance per core than i7 9700k's.
@AlfaPro13372 ай бұрын
Nah, IPC matters, if your 8c has poor piss IPC, it's going to flop. Take a look at Faildozer, US$300 8c but fails miserably.
@artorias892 ай бұрын
i have the 9700k its a good cpu until you activate ray tracing
@thealien_ali33822 ай бұрын
Ray tracing is GPU
@artorias892 ай бұрын
@@thealien_ali3382 i have a 4090 and this cpu cant handle it, cant use raytracingin many games
@kiubilatortuga71172 ай бұрын
@@artorias89 I understand that there is quite a bottleneck between an i7 9700k and the 4090
@artorias892 ай бұрын
@@kiubilatortuga7117 9800x3d is coming bro
@pctek10004 күн бұрын
@@artorias89Ray Tracing even on the highest end cpus is a chore
@syedawishah2 ай бұрын
This is 5 generation difrence
@-Rizecek-2 ай бұрын
9700k vs 14500/14600K please
@Relox3612 ай бұрын
Theres no way that the i3 holding so good, wow
@chovekb2 ай бұрын
It isn't. Ddr5 6000.
@Relox3612 ай бұрын
@@chovekb Ok now it make sense XD, I totally forgot about that.
Nothing bad for i3-14100F but still same performance of a i3-12100F...
@azeem2k2 ай бұрын
hey try to add space marine 2 in CPU benchmarks please.
@ZteBlade-e4t2 ай бұрын
Porque o processador i3 se sai bem do que os outros? Não era para ele ser inferior?
@CarFlightGamesCFG2 ай бұрын
geração uai. Um da 9 geração e outro da 14 geração, isso ai são 7 a 8 anos de diferença;
@kevinyoliveira682 ай бұрын
@@CarFlightGamesCFG Tá doido 7 anos? A diferença é de apenas 5 anos
@S0nnyxD2 ай бұрын
9900k vs 14400f or 7500f 💝🥰
@Theworthsearcher2 ай бұрын
That's why I don't buy intel. If I havve a decent AM4 Mobo, I can pgrade to a decent ryzen 7 5800X3D. Meanwhile here we speak about 3 different Socket generations. 😞
@muhammadasadmalik46692 ай бұрын
@Theworthsearcher But the real question is, did you? Having an option but never using it doesn't make it practical. You can use the same motherboard for Intel 12,13 and 14th generation CPUs. But if you are changing your system after a decade these options would be obsolete. Though I will add, looking at current generation of AMD Zen 5 and Intel Core Ultra, things have rather stagnated so maybe there will be no great advancements in the next decade.
@veela4202 ай бұрын
Did you?😂😂😂😂❤
@CarFlightGamesCFG2 ай бұрын
Quando lançaram o 9700k nem Ryzen existia.
@kevinyoliveira682 ай бұрын
@@CarFlightGamesCFG Para de mentira que já existia os Ryzen 1000 e 2000
@Theworthsearcher2 ай бұрын
Dear @@muhammadasadmalik4669 , Yes and not just me. I did it for some of my friends, as well. And many people did it 2- times (sstarted with st gen, then 2xxx/3xxx, then 5500/5600/5600, then 5800x3D
@prtech78052 ай бұрын
With power draw, 2024 made next step.
@JohnSpartan-1172 ай бұрын
I had this CPU OC’d to 5 GHz in my last pc Was a great cpu.
@onoffgeorg9828Ай бұрын
so i7 9700k now costs 60 dollars new lol
@zarkha_2 ай бұрын
Take i5 14400 and enjoy !
@assassins64512 ай бұрын
DDR5 makes the 14100F faster.
@thealien_ali33822 ай бұрын
i3 14100f It's ddr4 and ddr5 most likely he's using like for like since 9700k is a ddr4 system
@tamimashuri20052 ай бұрын
I3 10100F🔥💪💪💪💪💪
@RichdadfulАй бұрын
lol i3 beating older i7
@pullmeifinger2 ай бұрын
I get how you need to lower the resolution to create a bottleneck but in reality who games at that resolution with a 4090? It's unrealistic 😂
@FeherViktor-zl8bm2 ай бұрын
Starfield cpu hungry ........
@Григорий-о3о2 ай бұрын
Чувствую здесь какой нибудь обман.
@vleaksiae97652 ай бұрын
廉颇老矣
@TogrulAhmed2 ай бұрын
It would have been fairer if you compare them with the same RAM kit. But the change is unbelieveable.
@weejay28222 ай бұрын
Agreed. Maybe the i3 can still beat the i7 probably 5-6fps more
@Franki36832 ай бұрын
To the best of my knowledge. The i3 is a newer CPU and runs using DDR5 RAM where the 9700k can only run DDR4 RAM. Hence the difference.
@aisuotome14132 ай бұрын
same
@NickT93302 ай бұрын
Estaría bueno que las pruebas se hicieran en escenarios reales. Nadie juega a tan baja resolución. 1080p con DLSS en balance? Si pusieras 1080p nativo, el 14100f, no superaría en ningún juego al 9700k.
@ghostbuster23392 ай бұрын
The system performance will be limited by the video card
@NickT93302 ай бұрын
@@ghostbuster2339 exacto, así debe ser ya que, esta prueba, no está hecha para ver que procesador es mejor. Sino hubiera puesto los gráficos en bajo.
@ghostbuster23392 ай бұрын
@@NickT9330this test *_was_* done to see which processor is better. To see tests of one video card with different processors - go to other channels, you wont see it here
@NickT93302 ай бұрын
@@ghostbuster2339 si el video estuviera hecho para ver cual procesador es mejor, no pondría los gráficos altos porque, al poner los gráficos altos, el peso recae en la tarjeta gráfica.
@Diegonando642 ай бұрын
el test está bien hecho porque está usando una RTX 4090 que no llega al 100%.
@gameotic12 ай бұрын
That's why i7's are always better choice.
@qtube20072 ай бұрын
Wow.
@xeone54502 ай бұрын
Да а на 9900к можно вообще беспокоиться, потянет всё.
@ghostbuster23392 ай бұрын
Он наравне с 12400f
@vladimirolef19772 ай бұрын
У меня и тот ,и другой. там где нужно больше ядер 9900к всё же быстрее, а так в однопотоке 12400f заметно быстрее.
@bossmatsymoto2 ай бұрын
🤖
@дэнчикюсупов2 ай бұрын
+
@luxfi7772 ай бұрын
guess my is really outdated since it is 9th gen
@chovekb2 ай бұрын
It's the ddr5 6000 as big part of the picture.
@luxfi7772 ай бұрын
@@chovekb yeah i just saw that its pretty wild nowdays ddr5 6000 is kinda a basic speed