If Climate Change Can Be Addressed Is It Truly An EMERGENCY? | Spectrum Street Epistemology (4K)

[@drpeterboghossian]

If you're interested in watching another Spectrum Street Epistemology video on climate change, watch this next: kzbin.info/www/bejne/eYK4pnyZmMdrrZY

[@LouisGedo]

Another terrific session! 🫂

[@DaniTofte]

Consenting adults' sexual proclivities, whatever...but what about children? I want to know if climate catastrophizers aren't including children in their future plans because they're afraid. Are they not afraid of getting older without a younger generation to take care of them when they can no longer care for themselves? Are they expecting the children of other people to care for them...who will have their own parents to take care of? Seems like these nice people are in a death cult.

[@jswets5007]

@@DaniTofte The Nuevo Movers and Shakers... 😂

[@gergenheimer]

When I was a biology minor in college 35 years ago and took an ecology class, climate alarmism had already become well-entrenched in the media and academia. Science is supposed to live and die by its predictions - we've been 2-3 years from the extinction of mankind for 40+ years. When do we call B.S. and ignore the financially- and politically-motivated chicken little activists?

[@SineEyed]

I'm gonna go ahead and cut in line here to call out your claim as BS. I'll add that your opinion on the matter is irrelevant, as it is obviously biased and based on ignorance. Feel free to show that I'm wrong by presenting any published scientific paper which predicted human extinction in 2 - 3 years out..

[@TheKatieLea]

Not to be cynical, but the couples/partner questions lose a lot of their value when the partner is there with them

[@riukrobu]

And if in front of a camera, they have no value at all.

[@enekaitzteixeira7010]

Absurd comment.

[@TheKatieLea]

@@enekaitzteixeira7010 You're right, enek, nobody would ever think of giving a self serving answer to avoid relationship drama when they know their partner will hear it. How absurdly silly of me

[@enekaitzteixeira7010]

@@TheKatieLea Yes, you're silly, but not because nobody could do that, but for assuming selfish narcisism triumphs honesty between people that are in an actual relationship so much that even the question itself loses value.

[@enekaitzteixeira7010]

@@TheKatieLea In other words: "Not to be cynical..." * Proceeds to be cynical.

[@megan6808]

Ummm, it’s been only “five decades” since the Industrial Revolution? Clearly not referring to the one that occurred around 1760-1840.

[@Azathoth2980]

We are almost 50 year into Information Age. The 3rd industrial revolution

[@Si_Mondo]

More like 1700 - 1900, but yeah, she ignored it.

[@mattbrown4631]

Climate aside, I love these street epistemology videos. Would love longer form content rather than short clips, but I'll take what I can get.

[@LibertyPlusTV]

"Steal-man the position" "There's an emergency coming" LMFAO

[@Muonium1]

@@LibertyPlusTV steel, but yes

[@LibertyPlusTV]

@@Muonium1 lmao

[@derp8575]

@@Muonium1 Round earthers are the worst at steel manning the flat earth. Worse than liberals against conservatives, sadly.

[@mattwilliams3427]

It would be a great time to bring up the signed declaration that there is no climate crisis. 1,900+ scientists and professionals.

[@nickieglazer33]

Yes, it would. Those making the claim have zero evidence, in order to back up and prove said claim.

[@mattwilliams3427]

@@nickieglazer33 agreed, the climate crisis crowd has faulty models that have been proven wrong over the past decades every single time. It’s almost like they have forgotten the scientific method and just wish to push only the bits of data that back up an assumed outcome.

[@travismyers3396]

Almost none of those scientists were climate scientists, so why does their opinion matter?

[@TerryMurrayTalks]

I like the way you are refining the process of getting the participants to engage. For example the flip of a coin to create opposite veiws.

[@Lurch685]

Tony Heller proved to me that science doesn’t lie; climate scientists do.

[@thunderstreet78]

I had a close friend who was polyamorous. She (and others, obviously) got an STD, which broke up their little group. Here is the kicker: a dear friend came to visit me from another country and it was clear my two friends were going to hook up after meeting each other for the first time. My dear friend had just gotten out of a long relationship and was in a weak emotional state. It put me in the position of having to have an extremely uncomfortable conversation. Be more responsible, people. This is not a game.

[@C_R_O_M________]

The fact that Peter called them lovely people blew my mind! These are irresponsible children in an adult's body (not to mention that they have no idea what they are talking about in reference to "climate change").

[@jswets5007]

@@C_R_O_M________ I think it is similar to when someone says, "oh bless your little heart". Irony. But I could always be wrong. 😅

[@C_R_O_M________]

@@jswets5007 He went ahead and hugged these guys! I think he really meant it. Peter is not that bright when it comes to morality and metaphysics. His beliefs are mainstream Atheistic and that takes away many points from his intellect. He's a younger version of Dawkins (not as bright imho) and an improvement of Sam Harris. His metaphysics are also non-existent.

[@jswets5007]

@@C_R_O_M________ At least you added an h to your o. The riddle of steel, very good sir.

[@alextitei9748]

​@@C_R_O_M________ They were sort of nice, not highly intelligent but I've seen worse. I wasn't much smarter than them in my 20's. Nonetheless, they seemed fit, healthy and capable of rational thought. When they will find out that the CO2 warming effect declines logarithmically, as the CO2 concentration in the atmosphere increases and that there are currently 10x times more extreme cold related deaths globally than due to extreme heat, they will come around. From a societal point of view they do seem lost, they lack a meaningful purpose and posses a broken moral compass. As for Peter I only watched one video of his apart from this one, but personally he does strike me as pretty intelligent. Religious teachings however old they may be are interesting for non-practicing Christians/Jews as well.

[@stopthatluca]

Interesting that she thinks there has been more natural disaster than ever before - something that the IPCC would not agree with.

[@ADanZLife]

"if you look at the science and data" -- I bet you she has not looked at the science or data and is merely just believing what people have told her. I would urge everyone to watch John Stossel's interview with climate scientist Judith Curry.

[@jacobnussbaum2309]

​@@ADanZLifeI mean she did say she's doing a graduate degree in environmental studies so I think it would be fair to assume she has in fact looked at the data

[@ADanZLife]

@@jacobnussbaum2309 Incorrect. She said she studies "sustainability management". The guy said "climate and society". Neither of these are climate science. This comes straight from Columbia University: "Graduates transform organizations by formulating and implementing the sustainability strategies necessary to compete and win in the 21st century."

[@33greenleaf]

@@jacobnussbaum2309 she’s looked at the propaganda

[@jswets5007]

​@@33greenleaf She's bought and paid for the propaganda. 😂

[@Robert-Downey-Syndrome]

My boyfriend is a homosexual.....move.

[@Podcastforthewin]

dude, its not "Boy friend" its partner. now move. whats with this generation and being so fucking soft

[@garygogo9048]

😂😂

[@rd-mu2vj]

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@indeswma4904]

Bwahahahaha!

[@enekaitzteixeira7010]

Get some dignity.

[@davidpaul9961]

In the beginning I was asking myself, so she’s dating a gay guy right? And then the ending happened. lol

[@jamesbizs]

lol I was listening to this. And when I heard them say they are a couple, I was shocked, had to pause, and actually watch the screen

[@enekaitztixeira70I0]

You thought a woman was dating a gay guy. A woman. Holy shit. Do you have a single neuron?

[@enekaitzteixeira1070]

You thought a woman was dating a gay guy. I can't begin to describe how intelligent you are.

[@ajwysopal]

​Clearly you didnt watch the video.....the dude literally said at the end he is dating her.... And then went on to say he is also not straight.... So yeah.. Maybe watch the video

[@davidpaul9961]

@@enekaitzteixeira1070 plot twist. She’s literally dating a gay guy.

[@ADanZLife]

Question: If people believe there is a climate crisis/emergency, then why don't they live like there is one?

[@iancurrie8844]

"Fact don't care about your feelings, gang." It doesn't matter how people feel or how they act based on their feelings.

[@33greenleaf]

@@iancurrie8844 you misunderstood the question. The question was WHY don’t they walk the walk instead of just talking the talk.

[@iancurrie8844]

@@33greenleaf People are inherently selfish and short sighted.

[@jamesbizs]

Lol they claim that because they live in the society, they have no choice but to participate . Or, they need to use cars and planes and etc, to be able to spread their message. It’s all nonsense

[@33greenleaf]

@@iancurrie8844 you’re still not understanding the question. The people who BELIEVE this is an existential threat. Why don’t they act like it? If they believe and aren’t saving themselves it’s not because of selfishness or shortsightedness. Neither of those explanations make any sense.

[@kiefmanning7394]

She thinks the industrial revolution was 50 years ago? Your opinion is discounted

[@Muonium1]

"We're polyamorous" Nicolas Cage 'you don't say' face intensifies

[@daldladla]

"This is really fun for us, so we can explain if you like," Oh I'm sure it is.

[@jswets5007]

@@daldladla The fun part is freaking out the squares man, just like those free loving hippies from a the summer of STDs... 😂

[@jswets5007]

@@daldladla The fun part is freaking out the squares man, just like those free loving hippies from a the summer of STDs...

[@ElementsUnknown]

(To this couple) Daniel Tosh: “I am not honest but you’re interesting!”

[@derp8575]

She's poly, he's cucked. Is she using her powers as a woman to bring him more women? Doubt it.

[@davegrimm9091]

Polyamory, why don't just call it sleeping around?

[@HelloTygr]

It feeds their ego. They’re “special” and people who disagree are “bigots”.

[@jswets5007]

@@davegrimm9091 Why don't they just call a trans woman a man?

[@averageatom]

It’s an identity

[@enekaitztixeira70I0]

Because it's not the same.

[@enekaitztixeira70I0]

@@HelloTygr I'm not ina poliamorous relationship, but I just found the bigot.

[@paulsnow]

I would really prefer having more people in the game, including some who are at least somewhat informed. Other examples of Strret Ep. where he got exactly this were much more interesting, and that's evidenced by people changing some of their opinions.

[@nox2889]

It certainly appears that Peter just gets whom ever in public is willing to participate and that most of the public is opinionated and yet uninformed. I'd imagine a lot of people walking by would be too nervous to publicly state their opinions on video for KZbin for the world to see. With the era of social media today, it's very easy to be made the laughing stock of the internet over night.

[@paulsnow]

@@nox2889 Yeah. Also, I think many people haven't really thought through much of the issues...

[@jswets5007]

@@paulsnow They have to do unannounced pop up street epistemology because they have been targeted by bad actors who have tried to physically assault them in the past. At least that is what Peter has stated in some of his live stream conversations. The ones with several people are far better, I agree.

[@paulsnow]

@@jswets5007 I totally believe it.

[@LibertyPlusTV]

How do people have time to be polyamorous? I've been putting off laundry for two days lol

[@qigong1001]

And now you know why Mpox hits certain areas harder than others.

[@gabeo9474]

"I'm just totally making these up!" 😂 They were probably thinking, "is this dude crazy?"

[@Toorek100]

If my partner is not faithful to me, then obviously she is not honest with me. So it's almost the same thing.

[@ADanZLife]

Probably because you were monogamous, whereas they are polyamorous. Which means not being faithful by definition. Personally, I don't care the sexual lifestyles of strangers as long it's between consenting adults. I am 100% monogamous and I would put faithfulness above honesty. Everyone has their secrets and there may be good reasons for keeping those secrets, but if you're going to cheat, then don't be in a relationship.

[@queenpurple8433]

@@ADanZLifeyou should care about polyamoury. Just because someone is consenting adult doesn’t mean it’s morally okay or good for society or the human race. Polyamory is bad

[@jamesbizs]

@@queenpurple8433for the human race? While I think it’s mostly stupid, let’s not pretend that most of our early ancestors didn’t do this lol. I bet the only reason we are where we are today, was due to that. Hell, the shape of the human penis , is such, so that the head of it is able to remove sperm that was already in her. Sperm, is also capable of fighting off other sperm. We LITERALLY didn’t evolve based on monogamy. And our numbers wouldn’t be so prolific if that was the case. Monogamy is a choice. A choice that we make as a conscious and now intelligent being. As long as the kids are raised properly, society will be just fine. Most of our issues are coming from all the single moms. Better to have 2 dads and 2 moms, than just 1 mom, right?

[@Toorek100]

@@ADanZLife But if someone is cheating you, then that's person is not honest with you. It's impossible.

[@ADanZLife]

@@queenpurple8433 Lots of people have lots of different ideas about what is and is not moral. What is and is not "good for society". Who are you to dictate how others should live? Do you disagree with freedom and liberty?

[@Kentchangar]

Just like Peter said: agree or disagree with them, such lovely people.

[@jetnavigator]

Not a single catastrophic climate alarmist prediction has come true.

[@33greenleaf]

@@jetnavigator they just keep moving the goalposts though 😂

[@averageatom]

It’s an identity.

[@GeorgePapadopolous]

Numerous predictions have been realised. No need to use the pejorative "catastrophic". The planet is warming rapidly due anthropogenic CO2 emissions. Sea level rise is accelerating, hurricanes are getting stronger, heatwaves are becoming more common, polar ice caps and glaciers are rapidly melting, floods and droughts are increasing, the ocean is acidifying, fire seasons are getting longer hotter and drier and intense rainfall events are increasing due to Climate Change. All predicted, all happening.

[@MattAngiono]

Apparently, you don't understand how science works... Do you have any idea how much sea ice is in the Arctic? Does it even matter to you?

[@33greenleaf]

@@MattAngiono not a single prediction has come true. Not a single one 😂

[@user-useff]

If these two are an example of our future, I don't see a need to try anymore.

[@TheTaysoren]

Often times people suggest more education is the solution to societal problems- it’s not. Faith is. Education will not teach the morals and values necessary for a good society. America has historically been a majority Christian nation, and has been the catalyst to positive world changes; unfortunately we are slipping, as is the rest of the world.

[@Toorek100]

​@@TheTaysorenFaith is what they have in a classroom. That is the problem. It was not a proper education.

[@jamesbizs]

@@TheTaysorenyeah, just no. If the only reason you’re a good person, is due to fearing hell, or wanting heaven, or just being a god fearing Christian…. Then news flash for you. You aren’t a good person .

[@gabeo9474]

@jamesbizs Why does the motivation behind a good person's behavior matter? The goodness of a person is defined externally, so the cause of the good behavior is irrelevant.

[@_uncredited]

@@jamesbizs What if the reason you're a good person is because you strive to embody the virtues? I'm not sure what fear has to do with it, but a life well-lived is its own reward. Heaven on earth, etc. I'm not even a person of faith, but to dismiss Christian ethics is foolish. It's the basis for Western morality. Science can't help us explore that. Theology and philosophy can.

[@brianreid5891]

Polyamory is a natural disaster

[@33greenleaf]

@@brianreid5891 existential threat

[@jswets5007]

@@brianreid5891 Human nature is a natural disaster and an existential threat all rolled up into one paradoxical paradigm...

[@matthewkoplin4749]

Caused by global warming .... Probably

[@DjArcus]

Speaking from experience: it's very difficult to remove some kind of hierarchy from a poly relationship. 99% of those who say that a poly relationship is going great are not the one's at the bottom of that hierarchy. Who's on the bottom can also fluctuate, but a keeping everyone equally happy and felt equally seen is basically impossible in my subjective opinion. And that also goes for relationships I've observed, not just been a part of. Interesting experience, learned a lot, don't regret it, will absolutely never do it again

[@enekaitzteixeira7010]

Nah, you're just idiotic.

[@jetskiwillywilly7970]

These are the worse people....because they are so "dishonest". Even tho they stood on "honesty" is more important than sex with others, they choose other people to have sex with, but yet they would "stay" together if one had no arms or legs.

[@enekaitzteixeira7010]

Nothing about that is dishonest. Grow up.

[@jetskiwillywilly7970]

@@enekaitzteixeira7010 How can you "stay" together even though they arn't currently together? They can't dedicate themselves together while they have all arms and legs...what happens when they become less desirable?

[@enekaitzteixeira7010]

@@jetskiwillywilly7970 Lol. You're not making any sense. Watch the video slower, and then come back to see if you've understood It better.

[@BillyTeaStoop]

I hope this video is available for the climate activists to watch in 100 years.

[@33greenleaf]

@@BillyTeaStoop they’ll just move the goalposts

[@sloth_energy]

"...we have 10 years to prevent climate catastrophe"

[@33greenleaf]

@@sloth_energy less now 😂

[@bengreen171]

what is it about the constantly refined, constantly updated, accurate models created from billions of data points that have been correctly predicting the changes in climate for the last 50 years, that you disagree with?

[@jswets5007]

@@bengreen171 Are you talking about weather or climate? Because 50 years ago the "climate-crisis" was global cooling, not global warming. So those climate models from even 45 years ago are absolutely disproven. Which climate crisis prediction, of an extreme unnatural change, has come true?

[@iancurrie8844]

If the fire department can "address" a burning house, is it really an emergency? Yes, yes it is.

[@triumphstagdriver]

But is it still an emergency after it has been addressed?

[@bengreen171]

yeah - you have to wonder about the intellectual ability of Boghossian when he asks stupid questions like that.

[@mitzee8621]

@@bengreen171 For one, did you even watch the video? He mentions in relation to this exact question how it was made by the guy behind the camera going by Reed. For two, why would asking a seemingly simple question give cause to wonder about someone's intellectual ability? Do you also wonder about the intellectual ability of people asking others if they know what the capital city is?

[@bengreen171]

@@mitzee8621 For one - Boghossian signed off on it, and clearly thinks it was a good question. But I would draw your attention to the OP's example to see how intellectually vapid it is as a question. And I'm being kind - because the truth is that it is designed to undermine the seriousness of climate change. It's typical 'centrist' smugness of a mindset that thinks anything extreme is bad and therefore cannot be part of any rational discourse and isn't true. The 'centrist mindset' is limited intellectually because it is restricted by presupposing that truth always lies midway between two extremes.

[@kevin-g1w]

I think the meaning of "address" here is to take measures that would mitigate the "crisis." A burning house is already burning. We are not in "crisis" yet from climate changes.

[@trevorcook4439]

The Thames froze over in 1963. We’re coming out of a mini ice age. The question really is, how much is being hastened by human destruction? If any. The ozone layer was (still is in Australia) an issue and the stopping of CFC use has reversed that issue. Why (particularly in the US) does everything have to be so black and white?

[@JoelAdamson]

New title for this video: "Presenting a Likert Scale to People Who Demonstrate A Complete Lack of Judgment in the Most Important Arena of Their Lives."

[@kentcontreras4692]

The level of dissonance is off the charts, this is brilliant how peter lines up the contradictions. The climate crisis is an emergency to human survival, but strongly disagree that it will cause any human extinction in 100 years. Telling the truth is the most valuable aspect of a relationship, but they have an open poly relationship which implies little to no commitment thus not actually a relationship, but more of a set of social morays' involving sex and social interaction. Also "I could never abandon a limbless potato partner", yet they don't even commit to a solid concept by which a partnership exists; which likely discredits their entire strong agreement that honesty is a core virtue. If I were to be judgmental, I would assume they are incredibly dishonest and do whatever they please, so long as they're perceived as morally indignant concerning social causes among parties they associate. Also avoid any form of responsibility that could potentially create conflict with their egoic false sense of virtue. but I'm not reading into it much...

[@brizziefritz4794]

I struggle to see that 'lovely couple'. All I see is a selfish girl and a soft boy trying to cling to her and out of desperation sleeps with men.

[@TheMatadore]

💯

[@SomeNavyGuy]

@5:03 This is a perfect example of circular logic. The answer given almost sounds rational until the question is reconsidered.

[@Dielonthug]

Polyamory has an extremely low success rate. But good luck I guess

[@TraceyHenderson-ys2iq]

It’s interesting how these new “freedoms” actually aren’t so great once you’ve matured. Bet they’re both married in 20 years.

[@averageatom]

It never lasts but neither does anything else at that age.

[@enekaitzteixeira7010]

​@@TraceyHenderson-ys2iq You should Wait until you've matured to Talk about maturity.

[@enekaitzteixeira7010]

The comments are ridiculous.

[@TraceyHenderson-ys2iq]

@@enekaitzteixeira7010 😆😆😆

[@ShogunAssissin303]

Is the implication that something is only an emergency if you can't address it? So when someone is having a heartvattacknit's not an emergency because it can be addressed?

[@Fraggle-h7o]

I get a consistent impression from the scientific community that Climate Change is currently headed towards dire consequences. The "debate" seems to be entirely political.

[@33greenleaf]

You are repeating propaganda

[@Winterascent]

@@33greenleaf He made no such statement. You're in a cult.

[@33greenleaf]

@@Winterascent the climate cultists is telling people they’re in a cult? 😂

[@33greenleaf]

@@Winterascent cool ad hominem 😂

[@Fraggle-h7o]

@@33greenleaf I am not repeating anything. I am telling you my experience. You are merely demonstrating that you are willing to say things you dont know to be true.

[@nicolebaxter3999]

I would LOVE to see you do this exact game somewhere rural. Where people still maintain common sense and aren't disturbed by the woke mind virus.

[@mightisright]

All real problems are local. Flooding, tainted water, wild fires, soil erosion, etc. But rural people are on their own because the money is spent on pie in the sky problems that conveniently will happen sometime in the future... or not. Where do the resources go? People drinking Starbucks sitting at a desk all day, doing meetings until they retire having never accomplished anything.

[@nedhill1242]

Everything they stated is factually incorrect. Even the IPCC does not think climate change is a crisis. Not now not 100 years of the future. Peter missed a golden opportunity for the obvious second question. As soon as they both said California was the best state to live in. The next question should have been communism is better than capitalism/democracy.

[@geraldfreibrun3041]

But California is not communist...?

[@MattAngiono]

What are you smoking? Where do you get this idea? The IPCC has clearly stated there's irreversible catastrophic climate issues. You must have watched some inane propaganda to convince yourself otherwise

[@damirvaldgoni2625]

Najvažniji podatak za klimatologe: SVAKI RAD KAO NUSPRODUKT IMA TOPLINU. BONUS PODATAK: mali brojevi množeni sa velikim brojevima uvijek daju velike brojeve.

[@orsoncart802]

10⁻⁸⁷ x 10⁴⁶ = 10⁻⁴¹

[@orsoncart802]

10⁻⁸⁷ x 10⁴⁶ = 10⁻⁴¹

[@orsoncart802]

Replies appear then disappear then they reappear again. Just sayin’.

[@orsoncart802]

Nth time: 10⁻⁸⁷ x 10⁴⁶ = 10⁻⁴¹

[@jamesbizs]

They are a couple? He’s not gay? I didn’t watch the video, just listened. He sounded so gay

[@jamesbizs]

Lol ah, ok then

[@Podcastforthewin]

@@jamesbizs hah i take it you watched till the end haha

[@averageatom]

Yeah bro I doubt they’re banging

[@paulbutikofer4284]

Industrial revolution was in the past 50 years? So 1970s? Students today are so sad. And why is there a copy of the arc de triumph in new york?

[@TheNormallyOpen]

I can't help imagining that she has had a lot more partners than he has. "He is kind, and a good communicator"

[@derp8575]

Usually that is how it works.

[@enekaitzteixeira7010]

You're just showing your bigotry.

[@averageatom]

Dang. I didn’t hate these folks at all!

[@SecondVelcory]

Normally you ask good questions but what's up with this one? That's like asking if a heart attack is really an emergency if it can be addressed.

[@Winterascent]

How can you tell it is a heart attack, and not a panic attack?

[@SecondVelcory]

@@Winterascent Do you really want to risk it? Edit: And also that's beside the point, the premise is that it's a heart attack. Regardless of if you believe if climate change is real or not, the question still doesn't make sense.

[@Toorek100]

​@@SecondVelcoryIt's not about risk it's about distinct one frome the another. Without that knowledge you don't know what to do.

[@SecondVelcory]

​@@Toorek100 I added a clarification, my main point was about why the question in the video didn't make sense. Other examples would be, for instance, asking whether a stroke, a car accident or an allergic reaction are real emergencies if doctors can address them when the person reaches the hospital. Just because the doctors can potentially address the problem (if the patient gets to them on time) doesn't mean that the person shouldn't be immediately rushed to the hospital.

[@GeorgePapadopolous]

​@@WinterascentYou monitor his heart.

[@inilegnam]

Insane what people have been convinced to believe about earth's climates and ability to maintain homeostasis...

[@billbliss1518]

What weirdos

[@33greenleaf]

@@billbliss1518 extremely weird

[@ButtStuffBilly]

Why do you think they are weird? They seem like nice people

[@ADanZLife]

I have no problem with polyamory people as long as none of them have children. The way I see modern dating is that everyone is poly and sleep with lots of people. It's rare to find someone who has only been with 5 or fewer people sexually. I think it's better to wait for the bedroom stuff, but we live in a sex-crazed society.

[@33greenleaf]

@@ADanZLife well that’s the problem isn’t it? They do have children.

[@jamesbizs]

@@ADanZLifelol sex crazed society? We are probably more puritanical than most of human history. The human penis literally evolved, to scoop out the sperm of previous partners. And sperm itself, is able to fight off other sperm. Most of human history, we just had sex, all the time. Any time. Now, we can actually think about it.

[@MrHonist1]

Once these two separate all the dirt will make it so much harder. And if not the one in a 10 000 they will enviably fall due to jealousy. And if not they do not truly love them self's our there other half.

[@33greenleaf]

Narrator - *These were in fact NOT LOVELY PEOPLE!!!*

[@ButtStuffBilly]

Why are they not?

[@jswets5007]

@@33greenleaf These people are the climate-crisis...

[@33greenleaf]

@@jswets5007 they’re an existential threat

[@33greenleaf]

@@KonstantinosII nope, I’m speaking objectively

[@33greenleaf]

@@KonstantinosII nope, I’m speaking objectively. Those are not lovely people.

[@nikakozar832]

wild how much projection and hate in the comments for the polyamorous couple! you don't know their story. if it works for them it works for them, and you have no evidence to suggest otherwise bc you don't know them. and youa re free to live your own life monogamously if that's what you think is best. they really seemed like lovely people and they had thoughtful answers. (also do you know that men can be bisexual...?) love the street epistemology you do Peter! i got addicted to watching any chance i get.

[@enekaitztixeira70I0]

There is an interesting phenomena in this channel. While the content isn't particularly bright, the values it promotes are excellent: critical thinking, open-mindedness, free inquiry, skepticism, healthy debates, etc. However, when you get to the comment section, the only thing that can rival the idiocy that you find there is the dogmatism. It's pretty wild, and it happens in almost every video.

[@PWMoze]

Peter's reaction at the end is great!

[@33greenleaf]

@@PWMoze you misspelled “gross”

[@enekaitzteixeira7010]

​@@33greenleaf Ooops, you still can't think. Keep raging.

[@enekaitzteixeira7010]

​@@33greenleaf Man, you are really bitter and sad xD

[@33greenleaf]

@@enekaitzteixeira7010 😂😂😂😂 So upset you had to send me two replies? 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 That whole thing was absolutely *GROSS* 🤮 I unsubscribed from Pete’s channel.

[@enekaitzteixeira7010]

@@33greenleaf YT comments work better if you divide the replies, buddy.

[@THATMOFODIRT]

They’re so smart yet they do not understand what the word emergency means.

[@thomaspaaruppedersen6781]

I respect and like Peter Boghossian but I rarely feel like I learn *anything* from these street epistemology sessions. Other than how utterly uninformed people are. Like when the woman said statistics say that weather disasters have been getting way worse in the past 50 years, which is actually the polar opposite of what they say. (Also, AGW causes more heating in the polar regions, because CO2 is a more important greenhouse gas there, which leads to a reduction in temperature gradient across latitudes, which is a main driver of wind and weather).

[@DiogenesNephew]

"If your partner was a worm, you would still date them."

[@yomamma.ismydaddy216]

If I get shot in the chest and an ambulance is on its way to address it, is it an emergency? lol what a weird way of framing that climate question

[@tomoth77]

In the past 120 years, the Earth's temperature has risen about 1 degree. In that same period the Earth's population has gone from 1 billion to 8 billion. So tell me how global warming is catastrophic to humans.

[@enekaitztixeira70I0]

Because the later isn't caused by the former. OMG, you don't understand anything about logic.

[@tomoth77]

@enekaitztixeira70I0 i think you mean latter. But you are correct they are unrelated. Climate changes and life goes on as normal. There is no catastrophe. No emergency. Just unrelated events.

[@enekaitztixeira70I0]

@@tomoth77 The fact that one isn't caused by the other doesn't mean they are unrelated. Jesus Christ, you really don't know a single thing about logic, it's almost comical xD

[@enekaitzteixeira1070]

@@tomoth77 This is your first comment: "If air polution is bad for humans, how come air polution has increased in the last two centuries and population has risen?" And this is is your second comment: "Clearly air pollution and human health are completely unrelated". I can't begin to describe your idiocy.

[@4850937]

Free speech for all is needed to solve this.

[@alcambio5849]

You should just ask climate scientists about this topic.

[@duckycrippn3958]

8:25 😂

[@ZalMoxis]

My god, stupidity is certainly in the ascent.

[@Drifty325i]

Great interview, lovely couple, it works for them

[@33greenleaf]

@@Drifty325i no, no, and no

[@33greenleaf]

@@KonstantinosII I know all I need to know, and I’m 100% correct in my assessment.

[@33greenleaf]

@@KonstantinosII I know all I need to know.

[@enekaitzteixeira1070]

It's also funny how they managed to make the sheeps cry just by hugging each other xD

[@33greenleaf]

@@enekaitzteixeira1070 the title of this video should be “Peter BaGROSSian and his two *GROSS* friends” 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

[@DeepImpakt]

The girl had a nice dress though.

[@duckycrippn3958]

That is crazy how dumb/weak mean r these days

[@Outrjs]

The Holy Bible says when wickedness increases, the weather is used against such wickedness. The sun and weather has been more VIOLENT than in the last five decades.

[@iviewthetube]

It is sure great living in these interglacial times.

[@33greenleaf]

@@iviewthetube the lunatics are afraid of warm weather

[@iviewthetube]

@@33greenleaf Yet so many people are moving to the hottest places such as Florida, Arizona and Texas.

[@33greenleaf]

@@iviewthetube 😂😂😂 they definitely don’t believe what they preach.

[@GeorgePapadopolous]

​@@33greenleafHeatwaves can kill you.

[@33greenleaf]

@@GeorgePapadopolous spiders and snakes can kill you too. So can a fatty liver. What’s your point? 😂

[@introvertincognito4518]

So absolutely disgusting.

[@blackdiamond6077]

It’s not an emergency, it’s a scam.

[@GeorgePapadopolous]

There's a Climate emergency. Ripple - World Scientists' Warning of a Climate Emergency 2022 - Bioscience.

[@MattAngiono]

Have you looked at pictures of melting glaciers? You just don't understand what the concerns are

[@GeorgePapadopolous]

​@@MattAngionoI see the shadow banning has begun. Ripple - World Scientists' Warning of a Climate Emergency 2022 - Bioscience.

[@blackdiamond6077]

@@MattAngiono There's actually a paper published September 2022 by Nature Geoscience that debunks that false narrative. In the same spirit of "You just don't understand what the concerns are" I will respond with "you just believe everything you're told".

[@MattAngiono]

@@blackdiamond6077 which false narrative? What article? There's literally article after article on Nature Geoscience describing negative effects and warming... You don't debunk an entire field and all the observed processes with a single article. That's not how science works.

[@SuperSuperdude88]

these two are sheep.

[@enekaitzteixeira1070]

The irony of this comment xD

[@davidbourget9402]

Climate Change 😂😂😂

[@MattAngiono]

Yeah, because the climate never changes 🤦‍♂️

[@enekaitzteixeira1070]

Are you a climate change denier?

[@davidbourget9402]

@@enekaitzteixeira1070 Are you a programmed meat puppet?

[@enekaitzteixeira1070]

@@davidbourget9402 No. And I asume that's a "Yes" to my question, isn't it.

[@davidbourget9402]

@@enekaitzteixeira1070 Wake up…you’ve been indoctrinated. Break free from the programming and think freely. Use your god given discernment and stop being on the wrong side of history.

[@loayzc10]

Destined to not be together lol

[@iamgeoffclements]

Highly underrated comment (assuming your choice of language was intentional 😀)

[@enekaitztixeira70I0]

Neither the original comment nor the response makes ANY sense.

[@loayzc10]

@@enekaitztixeira70I0 I don't get the response either, but mine made sense lol

[@enekaitztixeira70I0]

@@loayzc10 "Destined to NOT be together"? What sense does that make?

[@loayzc10]

@@enekaitztixeira70I0 Like, their fate is to one day separate, because their strange unorthodox relationship can never last. I admit it, ok, it was a weird way to phrase it lol, but basically I just meant their relationship is doomed.

[@schrapnellcotton3413]

Sorry that guy isn't very masculine. That couple is just trying to appease each other.

[@enekaitztixeira70I0]

Your comment is soooo masculine, mate.

[@DiogenesNephew]

"We're polyamorous." Yeah no shit.

[@Dinglebeardedlady]

Dude is up talking.