He lost the empire the castles but he saved his dignity integrity and emaan may Allah kareem bless. His soul ameen
@Allhamdulillahi5 ай бұрын
Amin Thumma Amin
@Ameer-is3dh21 күн бұрын
@@QA8971 khilafah will be back again. Insha Allah
@toni_28912 күн бұрын
Er hat garnichts verloren, er gab dass reich so wie er es übernommen hatte. Der Putsch der Jungtürken "heute immer noch geheimgehalten die (Sabataistische Dönme Juden mit Europäischen Zionisten)" haben nach dem Putsch einen Partei namens "Ittihad ve Terakki"=Union und Fortschritt gegründet und haben die Macht im Osmanisches Reich übernommen. INNERHALB VON WENIGER ALS 10 JAHREN HABEN SIE IM REICH MIT DEM ENGLÄNDERN ZUSAMMEN FÜR KAOS GESORGT. DIE INNENPOLITIK POLITIK DER REGIERUNG FÜHRTE SPÄTER ZUR ZUMMENBRUCH DES REICHES WAS HEUTIGE ANATOLIEN GEBLIEBEN IST. PS: EINER DER ANFÜHRER DER UNION UND FORTSCHRITT Partei (ITTIHAD VE TERAKKI) WAR MUSTAFA KEMAL PASCHA UND ANFÜHRER DER PUTCHISTEN DES SULTAN ABDÜLHAMID. Als mann Sultan Abdülhamid abführte nach 33 JAHREN sagte; WENN IHR ES SCHAFT 10 JAHRE DASS REICH ZU REGIEREN OHNE ES ZU ZERBRECHENWÄRE ES IN MEINEN AUGEN WIE 100 JAHRE !!!! NICHT MAL 10 JAHRE HABEN SIE ES GESCHAFFT. ALSO ABDÜLHAMID HATTE NICHTS ABGEGEBEN.
@SultanSkindarZulqarnain6 ай бұрын
The true last Emperor of Muslims ❤
@aquagaming34806 ай бұрын
there is not emperor muslims nor ottoman or nor any other nor a country is muslim nor a president i think islam deny nationalism and emperors.
@brahim1196 ай бұрын
*@user-ov3xe9jy2t.* Caliph and Sultan, no such thing as _empereur_ or _king_ in Islam. Muslim have only One King, *ALLAH, Al Malik.*
@SultanSkindarZulqarnain6 ай бұрын
@@brahim119 you don't know about Islam there is the Caliphate in Islam not president As you can see in the form of Rashiduddin Caliphate You should take some knowledge about Islam then start talking
@brahim1196 ай бұрын
@@SultanSkindarZulqarnain I think you replied to the wrong person. READ my previous comment again.
@yusuf619rahmani6 ай бұрын
@@brahim119 أَلَمۡ تَرَ إِلَى ٱلۡمَلَإِ مِنۢ بَنِیۤ إِسۡرَ ٰۤءِیلَ مِنۢ بَعۡدِ مُوسَىٰۤ إِذۡ قَالُوا۟ لِنَبِیࣲّ لَّهُمُ ٱبۡعَثۡ لَنَا مَلِكࣰا نُّقَـٰتِلۡ فِی سَبِیلِ ٱللَّهِۖ قَالَ هَلۡ عَسَیۡتُمۡ إِن كُتِبَ عَلَیۡكُمُ ٱلۡقِتَالُ أَلَّا تُقَـٰتِلُوا۟ۖ قَالُوا۟ وَمَا لَنَاۤ أَلَّا نُقَـٰتِلَ فِی سَبِیلِ ٱللَّهِ وَقَدۡ أُخۡرِجۡنَا مِن دِیَـٰرِنَا وَأَبۡنَاۤىِٕنَاۖ فَلَمَّا كُتِبَ عَلَیۡهِمُ ٱلۡقِتَالُ تَوَلَّوۡا۟ إِلَّا قَلِیلࣰا مِّنۡهُمۡۚ وَٱللَّهُ عَلِیمُۢ بِٱلظَّـٰلِمِینَ﴿ ٢٤٦ ﴾ • Dr. Mustafa Khattab: Have you not seen those chiefs of the Children of Israel after Moses? They said to one of their prophets, “Appoint for us a king, ˹and˺ we will fight in the cause of Allah.” He said, “Are you not going to cower if ordered to fight?” They replied, “How could we refuse to fight in the cause of Allah, while we were driven out of our homes and ˹separated from˺ our children?” But when they were ordered to fight, they fled, except for a few of them. And Allah has ˹perfect˺ knowledge of the wrongdoers. Al-Baqarah, Ayah 246 “Successorship (al-khilâfah) after me shall last for thirty years. After that, there will be kingship.” (Ahmad) Many other narrations also, monarchy is accepted
@osmanlisuleyman99099 ай бұрын
In a short span of maybe 15 years, the heroes and villains the Ummah has seen....May Allah give Abdulhamid Han and Fahreddin Pasha the greatest positions in Jannah❤
@sulaimaanahmad6 ай бұрын
اللهم آمين
@KILLER.KNIGHT6 ай бұрын
Ameen.
@KILLER.KNIGHT6 ай бұрын
@@cartesian_doubt6230 Shut up infidel! That’s where you’ll end up you dirty devil!
@mustafagolubic22356 ай бұрын
Ameen
@KILLER.KNIGHT6 ай бұрын
@@cartesian_doubt6230 We know you will be.
@Haroon38931 Жыл бұрын
Only by returning to the Quran and Sunnah will the Ummah be revived.
@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543 Жыл бұрын
people skip teaching the right Aqida is wrong, that is how the sahabas build themselves up first, in fact just ask how the last Caleef peaked & fell, in 1680 they peaked under Taymiyyan Turks teaching Tawhid and shunning shirk, but when they were exiled, Sufi grave worship took over... Allah tied Tawhid to safety in Quran 24 :55, the sufi Uthmanis lost land, divided , even infiltrated as they made up stuff anyone fit in... and became secular until wanting to remove Arabic and Ashari Jordan rose up backed by uk, the exiled Taymiyyan turks went south to Syria & their students taught Ibn Abdul Wahab whose later generations would form the sunni gulf nations today, like Saudi Qatar or Bahrain ... and save the Haramain from uk and jordan... So where did the victory go... it went with the right Aqida... the correct Aqida is needed for victory in Quran 2 :137, Quran 9 : 25 shows numbers isn't the key to victory!
@Afghan3111 ай бұрын
@@falsesectslikeshiaarejudeo6543 Where was the 'correct aqeeda' before Abdul Wahab?
@aviatorzthebest24529 ай бұрын
Indeed.
@منذر-ح1ذ8 ай бұрын
@@abdullahassaffahAudhubillah, do not compare Muhammad ibn Abd Al-Wahhab to Hajjaj.
@Abrahamicunity7 ай бұрын
So true but sadly we are living in times when even 'Muslims' are criticising sharia law and rather then learning lessons from last 100 years we continue to be reactionaries and every time 'they' succeed to cause further disunity in ummah 😢
@tackmerci93136 ай бұрын
Wahhabism, founded by Ibn Abdul Wahab, was one of the important factors that contributed to the downfall of the Caliphate. They began by accusing Muslims, especially the Ottomans, of being kafirs and advocated for their eradication. They aligned with the British and received military support. Later, they signed the Treaty of Darin. Today, this manipulation of religious teachings to serve the West continues, with military bases spreading in Wahhabi countries. Despite Wahhabism's existence for three centuries, no fights have been led by Wahhabism against England or the USA. Their so-called scholars were once advocating for Jihad on every media channel during the Arabic Spring, but now, during the genocide in Gaza, there is silence on Jihad from them.
@dhuss146 ай бұрын
Salafism was brought to Saudi Arabia by freemasons and merged with the divisive, deviant wahhabism to create a watered down, subservient to the government version of Islam. It was put into a high position by Rockefeller Oil
@FerayKelan6 ай бұрын
The New name of Wahabis are now Salafists saying to peaple first pray and then talk about Gaza or dont protest to the government leaders dont boycot it will not help . Even McDonald's,KFC big Pro Israel supporting places are open in Mecca & Medina there is not boycoting if you saying anything they take u in the prison. They working togehter with Crusaders to fight against Islam .
@werewolf71406 ай бұрын
Well said ,to the point
@ER-ot4bh6 ай бұрын
👏👏👏👏👏🙏🙏
@yassine073t6 ай бұрын
The late Ottomans were known for their sufism and shirk practices. Mohammed ibn Abd al-Wahhab introduced renewed Tawheed to the Muslim world.
@H.ÖzerkanMavi5 ай бұрын
He fought the British for 2 yrs. They fought him with a million soldiers but couldn’t touch him. Nor could they touch the tomb of the prophet (saw).
@dildarbhai576713 күн бұрын
Arabs cannot be trusted, they are traitors
@kirankrishnan50856 ай бұрын
The last true and powerful Caliph of the Muslims, Sultan of the Ottomans and Khagan of the Oghuz Turks of Anatolia. May Allah SWT grant him Jannah and may he dwell in the heavenly tent of his ancestor, Oghuz Khagan.
@rojvankoc72524 ай бұрын
What Oghuz Turks in Anatolia? There are barely none. What have you smoken mate? Have you ever been in Turkey and seen Anatolia?. By the way Abdul Hamid was never called "Khagan of the Oghuz Turks of Anatolia". You dreaming pal
@rojvankoc72522 ай бұрын
@@عبدالرحمنعبدالله-ز4م My family clan have lived in Ankara, Haymana for 300 years. If history is correct my ancestors fought beside the Ottomans against the Safavids which ended with the Ottoman Sultan granted us (Kurdish tribe) land in the capital of Turkey. What you talking about braah. Real Turkic people are not a majority in Anatolia. Everybody got more or less mixed with time. That what im trying to tell you
@ividuri-hr2hf5 ай бұрын
I am a historian by profession. Let me say this for sure: he was the last True caliph of Islam. When he was deposed the UMMAH died also...
@sucrecalderon5 ай бұрын
Exactly ,,he knew about the intrigues against ummah to late but still.tried to build a new wave and builded schools around the empire to teach them right so the future youth would act righteous but he was to late sadly
@ilkercan855421 күн бұрын
I think you didn't read enough history books. Abdülhamid the second was one of the worst sultan in the history of Ottoman Empire. In 33 years if he did what German or Russian empires did, Ottoman Empire could survive.
@krtlkrtl890318 күн бұрын
@@ilkercan8554 Bilgilerin resmi tarihin yalan öğretilerinden ibaret. Abdülhamit Han dönemini araştırırsan çoğunun yalandan ibaret olduğunu göreceksin. Ve ihaneti kabullenmekte zorlanacaksın. Abdülhamit Han, tahtan indirildikten sonra imparatoluk 10 sene dolmadan yıkıldı. Büyük toprak kayıpları bu dönemde oldu.
@rb766910 ай бұрын
May Allah have mercy on the Ottomans those who fought for the holy places. And may Allah curse the munafiqin like the munafiqin of nowadays.
@nizameusope67306 ай бұрын
Ya Allah. To you we doa to place Sultan Abdul Hamid among the righteous. Despite the tough times, he did his best. May Allah bless us with future equivalent leaders among the ummah.
@H.ÖzerkanMavi5 ай бұрын
The Pasha was tied up and turned over to the British, not by the Ottomans, but by the sheriff of Medina. This is in the testimony of the Sharif Hossein himself. The British fought him for two years with 1 million soldiers but they could not get near him or touch his forces near him.
@shabzinoo5011 Жыл бұрын
May Allah have mercy on the Sultan. Great work from the team. Keep the videos coming!
@JaaKamSaa_10126 ай бұрын
Thank you for compiling this video! I've been waiting for someone to put together the event that took place toward the fall of the Ottoman Empire: Sultan Hamid II's dethronement and fall!
@Armanispice5 ай бұрын
A ruler of dignity, who felt for the ummah, may Allah accept him into the highest level of al firdaus 🤲🏼
@ae86scorpio7 ай бұрын
Great documentary. Keep up the good work.
@Historyun7 ай бұрын
Much appreciated!
@Mr.Therapist16 ай бұрын
He was the last true Head of the Muslims, a fatherly figure looking after his children all over the world!
@japaniphal87211 ай бұрын
Splendid. Loved the documentary. MashaaAllah great work . Amazing!
@baberali-gm2hr7 ай бұрын
Thanks for the documentary.MY ALLAH UNITE US AGAIN
@ertugrulbae466 ай бұрын
It was a combination of the zionist west which was allied to jewish extremists within Turkey, the arab traitors who revolted the Ottomans with western backing, and internal proxy-terrorists backed by the west including the wahabi saudi tribes and western backed secular turks from the youth. On the otherhand we also had koofar crusaderists from Russia on the other front, who also backed armenian terrorists to instigate chaos within turkey.
@fuadahmed55016 ай бұрын
We don’t need any caliph to be a good Muslim. Your great Caliph was responsible for massacring 1.5 million Armenian Christians.
@SonoftheFortunate5 ай бұрын
Why don’t you mention the internal decadence and racism as well as shirk done by the turks as well? You think everyone is to blame except the Turks themselves? Fact is, errors were made by all sides.
@Truthseeker6129-f7dАй бұрын
@@ertugrulbae46 kisa ve oz, Bravo!
@IroncladStrangerАй бұрын
So in other words people within your empire didn't like being ruled by foreigners, revolted and won. Your ancestors lost haha.
@saadimadina133713 күн бұрын
Bingo. Finally someone gets to the root of this whole thing. British this British that but no one says the Brits were just lap dogs used for this grand plan to bring down the caliphate so Palestine can be taken over which was the ultimate goal.
@_Z.K_9 ай бұрын
Excellent presentation of an important topic. Woe unto those who assisted in the betrayal of Islam
@arizkabir26286 ай бұрын
This video deserves way more views.
@PhilExp5 ай бұрын
Secularists in modern Turkey do loath him. At the end of the day, have a look at the current situation of Turkey in every aspect as well as those of the world and Muslims altogether. I personally long for the Ottoman Empire and the great Emperor Abdulhamid the Second
@PhilExp2 ай бұрын
@@عبدالرحمنعبدالله-ز4م History is not a field of conflict of ideas, and ideologies etc. It is not an area to exonerate the Ottomans either. What is meant here is that the Ottoman period relatively coincides with the most prosperous period in history
@PhilExp2 ай бұрын
@@عبدالرحمنعبدالله-ز4م Your comment gives the impression that it was quoted from the official history book used in the history classes in an Arab country. We can talk about what the Ottomans did wrong as well as what they did well. It cannot be said that they were completely perfect or bad. Likewise with the Abbasids and Umayyads. They were all part of the Islamic civilization. The sincere period of the Ottomans lasted only 300 years. Then the decay began. Despite everything, it must be admitted that the Turks served Islam a lot. Imam Ali may Allah be pleased with him, had a warrior unit consisting of Turks. Ammar's father Yaser and his mother Sumayya, and Salman the Persian as well may Allah be pleased with Them were Turks. During the time of Our Great Leader Prophet Muhammad peace and blessings upon Him, activities were carried out in Khorasan to convert the Turks to Islam. Turkish warriors of Khorasan came to help Imam Hussein may Allah be pleased with Him in Karbala. Imam Hussein may Allah be pleased with Him sent them back to face his fate. Abbas' son Kussam may Allah be pleased with Them is buried in Samarkand. The Turks are the sword of Allah. This must be accepted as such. Racism is a disease prohibited in Islam. It is the custom of ignorance. Except for the period of the Four Caliphs (may Allah be pleased with Them) in the Golden Age, all rulers are kings and cannot be expected to be perfect. A king cannot be a Caliph. Of course, the period of Omar bin Abd al Aziz, may Allah be pleased with him can be taken as an exception. I think it is necessary to look at the issue from this perspective and realize that there is no use in cursing history. Does Turkey have the ability to represent Islam today? No way. Unfortunately, most of its people have no knowledge of religion. They have become ignorant. However, Allah willing, pure-souled and good-hearted people will return to their roots. May Allah grant guidance to the entire Islamic world. Amen. In my humble opinion, currently Gazan people are most pious Muslims on earth. They are deliberately abandoned by the whole muslim (?) world and have nobody but Allah. Thanx for your patience. Sincerely
@oguzmergun2 ай бұрын
almost everyone in turkey loves fatih sultan mehmet secularists love him too
@crafterianinks721915 күн бұрын
Is it true since you are a turk?@@oguzmergun
@oguzmergun15 күн бұрын
@@crafterianinks7219 yes i am turkish and secular and definitely love fatih sultan mehmet yet i didnt see anyone didnt like him
@axis231210 ай бұрын
Akhi this is brilliant. I'm listening for the second time. Who are the speakers? Barak'Allahu feek
@len.gal1Ай бұрын
The first speaker is a tasawwuf Sheikh Loqman Effendi (Osmanlı Dergah) MashaAllah. jazakAllahu Alf khayran to @HISTORYUN
@sultana_1344 Жыл бұрын
Great video, I liked the way it flowed like a story. However, please could you provide sources?! Every great historian or seeker of knowledge wants to know where they got their facts from. For instance, who are the speakers in this video? And where can we find their original talks?
@_haniif_8 ай бұрын
I second this request, Ustadh AZ. JazakaLlahu khayr for the presentation. But kindly include references one could visit later.
@haashaas25084 ай бұрын
HE WILL ALWAYS BE MY HERO!! I COULD NOT STOP CRYING WHEN I WENT TO PRAY FOR HIM AT HIS TOMB. HE WAS DONE WRONG!
@nikkinounou83556 ай бұрын
They are still doing the same thing now. They will never change
@rahyasircreations60883 ай бұрын
May ALLAH grant our beloved sultan highest place in jannah and accept his services to islam and ummah!ameen
@ANRZtravels5 ай бұрын
Payhet series is really good insight into Abdul Hameed ll
@bill59316 ай бұрын
Shaykh Lokman Effendi Hz towards end of the video is a true Tasawuf Shaykh. (From the Osmanli Dergahi)
@zbfilms67514 ай бұрын
To all young Muslims including me - let’s remember this and learned from this and never to repeat the Foolish steps of this traitors - I had never cried like this 😢
@haashaas25084 ай бұрын
I cry every time when I think about how the greedy Saudis betrayed the Caliphate and Islam
@PhilExp5 ай бұрын
Rest in peace, the late Great Emperor of the Muslim Empire. But never despaire the Phoenix will rise again soon
@Imrenicli6 ай бұрын
Great video. Who is the English speaker in the Documentary?
@rafailsyed70518 күн бұрын
I could be wrong, but i think its Dr. Yakoob Ahmed. Would make a great guest for the channel anyways.
@mohammedabdulhameed95113 ай бұрын
May Allah bless the great caliph of islaam❤
@rocketkneez757021 күн бұрын
HISTORY is filled with short sighted and emotional men. Islam is always the middle path.
@LeixWUxLong5 ай бұрын
Secular Turks had the biggest hand in the downfall of the Ottoman empire.
@oguzmergun2 ай бұрын
ottoman lost the domination just becuase of missing the industrial age and it is the biggest hand others are just the last blows
@Ameer-is3dh21 күн бұрын
@oguzmergun they did catch up though. It's just colonialism gave Europe an edge over others
@oguzmergun20 күн бұрын
@@Ameer-is3dh they definitely did not catch up completely
@metrokentenerjiteknoloji63132 ай бұрын
لقد قاوم الأتراك الحروب الصليبية لمدة 1000 عام. ماذا قال قائد الحاكم الاستعماري البريطاني عندما سقطت القدس قال الآن انتهت الحروب الصليبية. ليست الهزيمة هي ما يزعج الأتراك. تطعمه لمدة 500 عام وتطعنه في ظهره بخنجرك. نحن الأتراك لن ننسى أبدًا الخيانة، وستصبح تركيا عملاقًا عالميًا مرة أخرى قريبًا جدًا. المشكلة هي أنه لا ينبغي للجنود الأتراك أن يذهبوا إلى غزة أبدًا. أنتم أيها العرب يجب أن تدافعوا عن أنفسكم. أمريكا وإسرائيل تحبانكم كثيرًا.
@lml7Ай бұрын
Imagine the amount of sins of soooo many years of broken ummah piled on their treacherous shoulders!! SubhaAllah
@mohamedr97656 ай бұрын
Good video, can you please provide citations? Where did you get the quote for king Wilhelm?
@theintuitivetruth5 ай бұрын
It is well know.. if you look it up about Wilhem II
@mohammedbashir17656 ай бұрын
Plz my special request to all Muslim ummah plz when you visit blue mosque in Istanbul do visit his mazar my role model my hero the great sultan Abdul hamid khan 11 he’s burried in grave yard behind blue mosque 🌹❤️🌹❤️🌹❤️🌹🇵🇰❤️🫡🫡🫡🫡🫡🫡🫡🫡🫡🫡🫡🫡🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷
@shmuyou313 Жыл бұрын
Beautiful
@nikkinounou83556 ай бұрын
Thank you for bringing the truth out. Today people are ignorant of their own history.
@rozanahwirt13112 ай бұрын
The British wanted the land of the Ottoman Empire.
@omercelebi20126 ай бұрын
Before the Ottoman Empire was founded, its collapse was obvious; In total, 36 sultans would ascend to the throne. Osman Gazi was given the good news by St. Mevlana. They tried the 37th caliph but it didn't work.
@biisgurey9185 ай бұрын
May allah have mercy on sultan abdilhamid. And brother as you tell the truth there is still some facts missing the rule of the itihadi’s and Zionist they are the real problem of the umah
@UR-MUNEER5 ай бұрын
Can i use this video and translate it to our language Malayalam
@Historyun5 ай бұрын
Yes
@awaisrafiq65774 ай бұрын
@Historyun what are the name of these speakers one of the is sheikh muhammad musa al sharif of Saudi Arabia I think
@deanjackson21026 ай бұрын
turks/arabs been helping the west for 100 years now
@IM-30006 ай бұрын
Araps still....the actual turkish leader not
@Giga-cat-c6b3 ай бұрын
Just imagine if he rules until his death in 1918. No Ottoman entry in WW1, no Arab revolt, no Armenian and Greek genocide.
@Zakariya36037 күн бұрын
Armenians and Greeks will still find a way to make it about them, they wanted Turkish lands for themselves, the "genocides" were mainly a response from Armenian and Greek aggression.
@shantsol15 ай бұрын
Ironically, the same education institutions that the Sultan sponsored proved to be his downfall. Large sections of the pro-constitutionalist Ottoman intelligentsia sharply criticized and opposed him for his repressive policies, which coalesced into the Young Turks movement.[6] Ethnic minorities started organizing their own national liberation movements. Armenians especially suffered from massacres and pogroms at the hands of the Hamidiye regiments. Of the many assassination attempts during Abdul Hamid's reign, one of the most famous is the Armenian Revolutionary Federation's Yıldız assassination attempt of 1905.[7] In 1908, the Committee of Union and Progress forced him to recall parliament and reinstate the constitution in the Young Turk Revolution. Abdul Hamid II attempted to reassert his absolutism a year later, resulting in his deposition by pro-constitutionalist forces in the 31 March incident, though the role he played in events is disputed. From Wikipedia: He was the mastermind of many Christian massacres and oppressions of the major Christian communities with the help of the powerful infiltrators of jews. Shame on you for depicting this man as an hero. History is repeating itself currently with state of Israel massacring the Palestinians. Please remove this content of bad lies and history from your channel. It's shameful and destructive of his true life story. He Paved a way for the 1.5 million people of the Armenian genocide other than the Greeks and the Assyrians.
@ahmadsaad94652 ай бұрын
Thank you
@IroncladStrangerАй бұрын
Arguing that the ottomans were innocent of colonialism is not just an absurd lie but the highest level of narcissism possible, even for a Muslim. The ottomans attacked, enslaved, raped and castrated all the way to Vienna and got fought back tooth and nail until they finally capitulated. If they weren't bankrupt in the 1800s they would have no doubt industrialised and carried on with "pan-islamism"
@surfacesvelocity33773 ай бұрын
loved it and understand it well
@umitaltay4656 ай бұрын
Poor guy didn't have chance sebatay jews from Greece Armenians and west not to mention the zionists were all against him,Also The Arabs in Arabia who were promised a kingdom then later screwed by the English who Attacked the train line and the Turks ,Ataturk giving way for the english to take palestine ,All this because the ummah failed ,Once the ummah wasn't airtight leakes started to happen ,Water sleeps but the enemy does not !!
@saadimadina133713 күн бұрын
Facts. The infiltration was finally unraveling - it started in the 1700's took them 200 years.
@UcmayiBilmeyenKus20 күн бұрын
im turkish and im happy that we got rid of this guy early enough.Developement and progress could not raise in our country because this little royals who built castles everywhere but let the people be unedcuated,poor and no idea whats happening in the rest of the world.Thanks Atatürk who finished these guy's rule.
@N4C206 ай бұрын
23:19 the man number four from left is, emanuel carasso (karasu) He was a jew , after it succeed for for this group of jews to take Ottoman imperium down, he moved to europe, and he was one of the creators of Danone.
@werewolf71406 ай бұрын
The answer to your Question is the Arabs betrayed the whole Muslim Ummah, which lead to other betrayals.
@Nixo776 ай бұрын
You can't forget those young Turkish rebels and the fake turk kemal.
@werewolf71406 ай бұрын
@@Nixo77 Who made the Ottoman Empire weak for that phase to happen the cowardly Arabs.
@imawormbeforeiamman60526 ай бұрын
@@Nixo77nah, the seeds of trouble came from as far as during Suleiman I reign. He Made too many bad decision regarding his sons. His immadiate succesor was to be the first Ottoman sultan that never go to lead the Ottoman army into war. The Ottoman went backwards in the 18th Century after series of incompetent and uncommited sultans
@SonoftheFortunate5 ай бұрын
@@imawormbeforeiamman6052 Not just that, the people began committing shirk.
@werewolf71403 ай бұрын
Please don't forget the Arabs were the root cause of the decline of the Ummah, so don't sift the blame.
@muhammadpatel13685 ай бұрын
Next part?
@samsulazizan90993 ай бұрын
Our Sultan❤❤❤❤
@MasumAli-r9yКүн бұрын
Ironic that 'Sunni' arabs allied with the crusaders (British empire, Australia et al) to destroy the Caliphate. The British even used the word crusade during the wartime propaganda. Sunni's accuse Shia of allying with the crusaders but the Sunni allied in recent times!!!
@kabiruzzaman51293 ай бұрын
Peace 🕊️
@aqsamaryambee Жыл бұрын
imagine being so full of audacity, you topple the kingdom just because you're bored I always felt that Ataturk (who btw wasn't even Turk) was more of an antimuslim traitor than a wise leader, espacially when I heard that he provided that roadmap to Hitler and Turkish people just celebrated 100 years of democracy
@abrahamgustavoguitiperez-m29379 ай бұрын
Please explain further.
@aqsamaryambee9 ай бұрын
@@abrahamgustavoguitiperez-m2937 Ataturk was a member of the Freemasons order. He was very pro Europe. That wouldn’t have been a problem if he did not push the Turkish nationalistic narrative, built the narrative that the Caliph isn’t a truly Muslim caliph because he’s not supporting the Muslims of India using Islamic values as a tool, got Abdul Hameed II disposed off with a group of like minded people, offended the Shareef of Makkah which initiated the whole Middle Eastern revolt against the ottomans, and once the caliphate was over, he introduced a brand of secularism which was very very anti-Muslim 1. He banned azan in Arabic 2. His policy makers shifted the font from Arabic style alphabets to Latin alphabets 3. Introduced the hat law 4. Banned Islamic clothing for men 5. Witch-hunted the sufi orders, criminalising zikr 6. Turned Hagia Sophia into a museum These are clearly steps to divorce the Turkish nation from their Islamic past. Other than that, he basically Europeanised Turkey. Giving third names to families, which isn’t a Muslim tradition but a european practice. The very thing for which he criticised the caliph, he did that by developing relations with UK. And he himself was quite a debauch person. He contracted an STD because of which he had to have his physician up close till his death, his drinking habits caused him his liver and he couldn’t hold on to a wife. He even refused to accept the dead body of the last caliph in Turkey. And ordered his own burial, not in a grave like Muslims, but in a sarcophagus like Pharaohs. People think of him as a hero who fathered the nation, well he just made it illegal to criticise him. All books, all literature, all the things that came out of his time were heavily censored. This sounds very much like dictatorship to me. And till date, it is illegal to criticise him in Turkey. This was quite impressive for Hitler who followed in his footsteps. Kurdish people are still suffering because of his regime. Infact, his brand of secularism is what France insists upon now I have no stakes in Turkish history, but I refuse to see Ataturk as the hero he’s painted as.
@nighatullah38574 ай бұрын
Ataturk he wanted to get of all 🕌 , Quran, even Anatolian language & dress code . He wanted to get rid of ☪️ in Türkiye he made into a secular country . He did die painfully, Allah’s will
@Gulchih4 ай бұрын
The subtitles are really difficult to read. Half of it is in Arabic audio with 5 pt font subtitles appearing in white over black-and-white images so we lose our eyesight in learning about Sultan Abdul Hamid. Please, subtitles should always be in a simple dont, black on white or white on black with clear contrast.
@ashah40344 ай бұрын
Can you list the speakers names?
@bosbanon34526 ай бұрын
99th comment, i think this video is taking audio from other channel is saw few years ago, maybe you did it with their concenst but i hoping more 😊 like the discussion video. About muslim only care the history of their nationality aren't muslim nationality is inseparable with Islam? Ottoman history is also Turkish history. Last day i saw a podcast in a channel named Al Hakam who said the Ottoman desecrated our Propeth tomb by using it as fort and military storage ?
@Era_Of_Awakening6 ай бұрын
The Last Caliph.
@esataaa5 ай бұрын
Allah swt is the Greatest, the All Knowing, Allah is The Best Planner, look how Islam is moving towards the West, Everything happens by the will and command of Allah swt. Muslims are gaining more strength in their believe in Allah swt, disbelievers are getting to know what Islam actually means, lots of peopls in the West are converting to islam, nobody can push or oblige another to become Muslim, only by the will of Allah swt! There are always things happening around us, but we as Muslims understand that Allah swt is the one in control of everything, We can't blame others on the day of judgement bcz of our own actions! There is no lawyer defending you and me on the day of judgement! So, obey Allah swt, do rightious deeds, gain beneficial knowledge, look at your own actions, don't judge others, we have so many blessings from Allah swt!! Always remember, we are not in Jannah (yet), we are in Dunya, shaytaan is here with us, there is always the whispering of shaytaan to do sins and to disobey Allah swt!!
@d-4h190 Жыл бұрын
Turks within the ottoman empire were the great calamity and also equally responsible for the decline.. They were the ones who carried Western ideologies and were Anti Caliphate. Those were the ones who first caused the downfall of the empire. One can say Turks backstabbed their own Turks first. The decline was from within. From the roots..
@AO-jk1pg Жыл бұрын
no
@gajiburrahman7378 Жыл бұрын
I agree, the turks took the first Steps in betraying the Ottoman caliphate when they overthrew Sultan Abdul Hamid II. The Arab betrayal came later on in World War I. The final betrayal, the final nail in the coffin of the caliphate came from secular Turks like Mustafa Kemal Ataturk.
@SalehAbdurRaheem Жыл бұрын
@@AO-jk1pgyes.
@axaqwdfaa Жыл бұрын
This word "Betrayal" ... If betrayal means establishing Islam again, Alhamdulilah they "betrayed" the kuffar government of the Ottomans who allowed grave worship at the end of its reign@@gajiburrahman7378 May Allah Bless the Saudis for establishing Sunnah once again and getting rid of the Polytheism grave worship that the Ottoman empire brought into the masses of people. "Dua is Ibadah (worship)" - Prophet Muhammas SAW ... sunnah . com/adab:714 Allah is above the heavens and Earth as Allah and His Messenger have told us multiple times, "Have mercy on the creation so Allah will have Mercy on you from above the heavens"(or as said in another narration "the one who is in the heavens, meaning "above") - Mohammed SAW. ... sunnah . com /abudawud:4941
@umarshaikh381710 ай бұрын
@@gajiburrahman7378 totally agree with you. Young Turks, arab nationalism t name few
@f.s.14295 ай бұрын
Atheist Turks did it. The forefathers of the Kemalists. Which makes about 50% of the Turks today.
@senadneslan15635 ай бұрын
ottoam is not only turk ...your story is fro children
@anneeq0089 ай бұрын
Sultan Abdul-Hamid and his predecessors did since they ruled with incredibly superficial intentions rather than Islamic
@bm_wuratli68836 ай бұрын
what do u mean superficial intention????
@bill59316 ай бұрын
Rubbish comment
@fuadahmed55016 ай бұрын
@@bm_wuratli6883they used Islam to rule in power. That’s all.
@nikkinounou83556 ай бұрын
Muslims countries should teach theirs history to theirs children at schools.
@AlOstosman6 ай бұрын
How many times have you chamged the title by now
@diasalexandros66516 ай бұрын
To be fair, the Muslim Ummah themselves ruined it. Most Arab, Turk, Kurd, Persian had a relationship with the laws of Allah only. No relationship with Allah. Can a true believer who has a relationship with Allah pursue this ugly world.
@Maida1435 ай бұрын
Sultan Abdul Hamid was the best of the Sultan but sadly his Pasa s betray him so ottomans empire collapse with the help of traitors Pasas😢😢
@jamilhk7865 ай бұрын
Why didn't they bring taxes as required. It's a shame they didn't expand into Africa and stabilise it mabe the resource could have helped. Anyway the biggest problem was the disunity of Muslims which still effects us today.
@Sultan.A-200724 күн бұрын
Salam brother, I have a question about Sultan abdul hamid. Did he really perpetrate the massacre against the armenians and call for the confiscating of armenian land in the 1890s, or was it a lie? I just wanna know if it was true or not?
@saadimadina133713 күн бұрын
No those were the young Turks behind that. They were fake Muslims pretending to be but are something else. False flag playbook from back then.
@abdelmounaimmansour54655 ай бұрын
We should learn better our history as Ummah and stop trusting everything the west teach
@Hernani-c6f5 ай бұрын
Since immomerial religion causes troubles to the peoples of the world 😢
@ZoonChenar-lw5hxАй бұрын
The Arabs did not rebel against the Caliph but against the stupid Young Turks . The Caliph opposed Turkish involvement in WWI.
@artregeous6 ай бұрын
Al.must remember mutazila school Turks un the region carried out disciplines of mutazila un babasi period than later house of Osman as dynasty continued through from %95 none muskim mothers of sultans even allahu teala can not change this fact
@onyxabier4502Ай бұрын
Sorry to burst your bubble but he liked to have a rom in his spare time .
@hoggar145213 күн бұрын
About the Arabs please don't generalize and say the truth. What you said only applies to a segment of the Arab population in the Arabic peninsula. In fact most of the Arab world was already colonized by the Europeans that time.
@trooperffc5 ай бұрын
lost 1,6 million km2 of land. more than twice the size of current turkiye.
@Imrenicli6 ай бұрын
Only if Arabs not betreyed the Ottoman😢
@huthaifaabuodeh73235 ай бұрын
They dont
@huthaifaabuodeh73235 ай бұрын
Brother ottman fall in 1909 the arab fight turk in 1912 and + arab who go up on the ottman they was the arabian land and arabian land was not even controlling by otmman + if you know that ottman was more than 50% the sport in arrmy + oman empire and jabal shamar empire was always support ottman the problem happend after the group of attaturk come and the fitnah start between arab and Turkish
@bm_wuratli68836 ай бұрын
first calipha sultan mehmet han and the last sultan abdulhamid 2 two piece one with unity and other piece alone vs all and yet amazing characters compared to mbs is just a joke...
@ProteinSheik8085 ай бұрын
Can you cover the hamidian massacres or can someone explain to me why Abdul Hamid ii committed genocide on the Armenians?
@abdullahsaeed86345 ай бұрын
abdul hamid died in 1918 wdym he left in 1978
@ajmaeenmahtab84567 күн бұрын
The wahabis and Ahle Saud destroyed it.
@huseyincan55163 ай бұрын
❤
@rozanahwirt13112 ай бұрын
It’s kind of naive. What he wanted was lovely….but you are dealing with the British…..greed….
@umarsamaai8707 Жыл бұрын
Who's the speaker?
@imran.travel Жыл бұрын
Sheikh Lokman Effendi is the one who speaks on Ottoman history
@---ct5tm Жыл бұрын
The other one is Muhammad Musa AlShareef
@hp3861 Жыл бұрын
Dr Yakoob Ahmed
@Herbalist-Pak6 ай бұрын
Allah not protect them who asking help other than Allah.
@TheMatin1 Жыл бұрын
04:05 how we can not? Either explain with clarity and 4-5 example that this is the Sharia, or rule, and such are it's options which can vary and not be constant, so such articulation would be tough and that there are countless such cases and scenarios. 06:51 The year is 1978, Abdul Hameed II was definitely invincible, and immortal, to be not bored of life. 08:31 There was an interesting question in a mock interview of the Indian civil services exam, what is the difference between a Sultan and a Badshah - a term widely used in South Asia, for the King or the rulers of different set of families and era. A Sultan would pledge allegiance to the Khalifa, while a Badshah would be sovereign. Only few initial dynasties of rulers in the Indian sub-continent or South Asia were reffered to as Sultan, the Mongols were reffered to as Badshah, so on what ground would the interference of the Khalifa be justified in the Indian sub-continent, although Sultan Abdul Hameed II interfered into the Indian polity during the British rule, as a reaction to British corruption directly affecting the railway project towards Arab geography, as per the Turkish Drama serial, I've not read any history. The Indian polity has the influence of the Khalifa, because there was a khilafat movement taught in the Indian polity during the British rule.
@xlappart6 ай бұрын
1) they british french etc.. creat Arabs nationalisme with Luwence of arabiya and other side turk nationalisme by bringing young turk with atat turk
@abdisalamfaisal30375 ай бұрын
8:53
@abdirashiidali86926 ай бұрын
Wahabisam sects are longer than we thought. The idear of Daish starts sultan Abubakar and Omar bin khadaab time let alone sultan osman bin Afan time when killing the Muslim umah goes every where
@1010BARCA10106 ай бұрын
Mistake at 6:50. 1878 and not 1978
@xlappart6 ай бұрын
when abulhamid resigne who was there ? Emannuel carosso yehudi ( grand father of createdr of Danone ) see photo and where they send Abdulhamid it was Thesssalonika where 70% population was yehudi and in which was home city of fake messia Sabbatai and Ata turk and in the house of riche yehudi Allatini villa where Abdulhmaid was house arrest until his death
@charlemeH3 ай бұрын
Explain to me who started the African slave trade 1300 years before the Europeans the Arabs or the Turks it’s because of the Islamic slave trade that the Europeans started to do it the a sultan gave the pope black Africa slave as a gift and why was only black African deemed a slave?
@saadimadina133713 күн бұрын
Islamic slave trade? Go sit in a corner with that BS disinformation. Call it Arab trade not Islamic
@RandomEmperor7 ай бұрын
1 little question, abt Armenian killings under Sultan Abdulhamid Han, how did it happen though?
@Resilient7867 ай бұрын
It was not a unilateral one. In it happened in a long drawn out conventional war between Tuks and Armenians.
@kizgintosbaga6 ай бұрын
they revolt and get suppressed. like whats happening in US right now.
@antinonsense6 ай бұрын
You don't seem to know the Ottoman history. Abdulhamid Han was toppled in 1909 and he was no longer the caliph after 1909. Toppled by the so called johnny-Turks who were masons and dönme jews in reality. It was the non influential Mehmet Reşad who was brought to caliphhood after Abdulhamid Han til 1918 and it was Vahdeddin Han from 1918 on until he was also removed and Abdulmecid was brought to, that would be around the year 1922 only being symbolic with no influence on any decisions. The alleged armenian massacre is said to be in 1915 which is also a lie except it was a forced migration to prevent them from being used by French to assault and kill Turks with a false hope that they would be given a country of their own carved out from Anatolia.
@kizgintosbaga6 ай бұрын
@@antinonsense no, they revolted during Abdülhamid he suppress the revolt and armenians allied with conconTurks to topple him and after they complete overthrowing him conconTurks get rid of them :D
@sucrecalderon5 ай бұрын
People write here out of knowledge ,,,Abdülhamid pasha wanted peace ,so he let even the Armenian people in jail all out but they not wanted peace ,so they made alliance with russia and france and with Russian forces they attacked Civil in villages and numbers was 2,8 mil turks that been killed and 1,3 mil Armenian people been killed,,,I saw the archives and armenia not want that archives get showed to the world ,,we say it was war even when from our side more been killed ,,so those with brain,,who made on who genocide