India & Pakistan | From Ashoka to Battle of Panipat to British Empire: Issues of North & South?

[@ProfRaviRanjan]

Thanks for very informative vlog. Despite few aberrations as well as omissions and commissions it may be helpful for the beginners. Wish to inform that Indian Universities have been able to retain several historians of international repute like Prof.R.S.Sharma, Prof.Romila Thaper,Prof.Irfan Habeeb, Prof.Bipin Chandra and many more who are considered authorities on ancient,medieval and modern India respectively. Your viewers/subscribers may go through books and articles by these stalwarts in due course and get true picture of the history of Indian subcontinent.

[@ravishingravi]

Well those Marxist historians and their view of history has got increasingly exposed. More will happen in coming years.

[@GVSNEWS]

Dear Prof Zanjan, I have pinned your comment on top! I claim no mastery on the subject, and there are many generalizations in my broad sweep in this video, but I wanted to point out towards change of power dynamics between North and South with the arrival of European arms, tactics and knowledge etc! And I am glad at the quality and depth of comments on this video! My goal was to provoke a debate! which is happening but once again overall interest in the subject is much less! Most viewers are obsessed with the daily events and treat Vlogs as reporting sites! Moeed Pirzada

[@siddharthbanerjee2816]

Read about chola empire and it's navy that had marriage alliance in modern day Singapore Thailand. Such uneducated man. Typical half educated Pakistani

[@deepakishere-e1d]

Communists masquerading as professors! Guys don't read a single historian this guy has mentioned they are a laughing stock in India if u quote their funny ideas. People just laugh on Thapars n chandras and some advice for pakistanis, these so called historians are actually the same elites from past, some are sons n daughters of Indian zardaris then some are relatives of Indian sharifs n bhuttos

[@shahroseamir]

@@GVSNEWS dr. Pirzada, I do understand when you complain that your viewers are only interested in Pakistan’s geopolitical developments. I partly agree with you but to be fair with your viewers, if one’s house is on fire he/she don’t cares what new colour his neighbour is painting his house with. On the same note, majority of your viewers are overseas Pakistan. Considering the current news embargo in Pakistan, you vlog is one of the few resources for any reliable news. I can turn on the CNN to see what’s happening around the world. Food for thoughts.

[@khalidashraf555]

The ancient city of Pataliputra is not in South of India and not in South of River Sutlaj, but located in North Eastern India. It's present name is Patna, which is the capital city of Indian Province of Bihar. This may kindly be got corrected.Furthermore Chandragupta Moria dynasty later on taken over by Ashoka had ruled India except South of India, and ruled part of Afghanistan and Iran also.

[@luckysingh2231]

Some correction The Mighty Indian Maurya Empire not only ruled upto eastern part of Iran and Central Asia, but the actual boundary of maurya empire is - Major Rock Edict 13 inscription clearly talks about the expansion of Maurya Empire - It mentions victory & influence of Maurya Empire over Selucid Empire, Egypt, Macedonia, and to as far as Magas of Cyrene , Alexander 1 of Epirus and to victory over Ceylon (Sri lanka) in the south. By the way this is the same inscription which talks about Kalinga War, but in the very same inscription ahead , it mentions about victories of Maurya over other parts. But people ignored that. i would suggest you to read a book - Book : Bharat's Military Conquests in Foreign Land. Author : Venkatesh Rangan. Regarding Indian History,which unfortunately we r not taught correctly bcos of distortion by British which was designed in such a way that to make us feel inferior. As George Orwell said - “The most effective way to destroy people is to deny and obliterate their own history'. There is a proverb that says, “Until the lion tells the story, the hunter will always be the hero.” No wonder instead of reading History of Indians, We read history of outsiders. And till now we read history which was designed by british. And it is a big shame for all of us. Like for eg - one fact that over 1380 years have been deleted from the Indian history in order to adjust it into biblical timeline which is limited in nature i.e 2000-4000 years. Prof Vedveer Arya has written books on this & has given challenge to western historians on this.Vedveer Arya has given his talks on KZbin. OR Aryan Invasion Theory, which was designed to create animosity between North India Vs South India. Infact it has been proven wrong by many people. And this theory now has been debunked many people now. So, there are plenty of things like this. Its only now slowly a lot of things are being unearthed and debunked and they are coming to limelight. When I am talking about India (it includes pakistan also as both Indians & pakistanis are the same people. Some Indian Empire who influence went beyond India ( Modern Day India + Pakistan) : 1. Maurya Empire - influence of Maurya Empire over Selucid Empire, Egypt, Macedonia, and to as far asMagas of Cyrene , Alexander 1 of Epirus and to victory over Ceylon (Sri lanka) in the south. 2. Samrat Vikramaditya - Legends says that his empire reached as far as arab peninsula to Mid-Europe. No wonder why the traditions before islam and christianity in these areas are very much similar to Hinduism/Santana Dharma/Dharmic traditions.Infact Arabic Poet Bintoi, who lived 165 years before Mohmad, endorses the fact that Samrat Vikramaditya ruled over Arab to East-Europe & he praises Vikramaditya for bringing prosperity to them. I hope someday Arab Govts allow the research for this. Indian Calendar is also based on Vikram Samvat Era.*For those who dont know that over 1380 years have been deleted from the Indian history by british in order to fit into biblical time period which is limited in nature i.e. 2000- 4000 years.Infact Professor like Vedveer Arya has explained this & has given open challenge to western historians on this. 3. Rajendra Chola : Great King of Chola Empire. Control over the land & seas.He established his supremacy over Arabian Sea to Bay of Bengal and conquered land upto Orissa & Bengal to whole south east asia upto Indonesia & Philippines with his influence reaching as far as East China Sea. By the way Chola Empire lasted for ATLEAST 1500-1600 years whereas Roman Empire lasted for only 1000 years 4. Lalitaditya Muktapida : His empire extended right from Bay of Bengal to Caspian Sea. He defeated the Arabs, Turks(Turkmenistanis), Tibetians, & others. Defeat of Arabs by Lalitaditya was a humiliating defeats for Arabs. He inflicted extraordinary humiliation on the Arab armies. Lalitaditya ordered the arabs, who were left behind to shave off half their heads as a symbol of their submission. 5. Kanishka - His empire extend from Northern India particularly from Bihar (state in India) in the east to Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, some more parts of Southern areas of Central Asia to Khotan areas(western areas in China) to Khorasan (Eastern areas in Iran). 6. Bappa Rawal : He defeated the arabs and he thrashed & chased them upto Iran and made check posts all the way from Iran to India. 7. Deva Raya II : Deva Raya II (r. 1422-1446 CE) was an emperor of the Vijayanagara Empire. The greatest of the Sangama dynasty rulers, he was an able administrator, warrior, and scholar. Defeated Gajapati Kingdom and annexed areas from them . Deva Raya II's empire included Kerala where he defeated the ruler of Quilon as well as other chieftains in the region. He later on invaded Ceylon and collected rich tributes there. The Zamorin of Calicut and even the kings of Burma ruling at Pegu and Tanasserim paid tribute. This information was obtained from the writings of Nuniz. 8. Samudragupta : Samudragupta is undoubtedly one of the Greatest Emperors of Indian History . He belongs to Gupta Dynasty. And according to me, if we consider all the factors, Samudragupta is probably, the Greatest Emperor in the world. Prayag Prashasti inscription talks about Samudragupta Extent of his influence - His capital was Pataliputra. At peak, his influence extended from Bihar and Bengal & Bangladesh in the east to parts of Rakhine areas of Myanmar to Assam & North East India to Nepal in North to Afghanistan and parts of Southern Central Asia in the North west to Tamil Nadu in South & to Sri Lanka & other Island Nations like Java,Sumatra & Malaya Islands.His authority over Java,Sumatra & Malaya Island proves that he also maintained a strong Navy. Gupta Empire had regular maritime contacts with Persia, Arabia,Byzantine Empire, Africa, and even further. 9. Ranjit Singh - His dominance was from western part of Delhi upto Kabul 10. Maratha Empire - At its peak Maratha Empire stretched from Attock to Peshawar in the North West to Tanjore(Tamil Nadu) in the south & to Cuttack to influence reaching Bengal in east with Nawabs of Bengal handed over Orissa & agree to pay Rs 1.2 million of chauth(annual taxes) from revenue of Bengal & Bihar to Maratha Empire. Some books recommendations to read 1. Book : Bharat's Military Conquests in Foreign Land. Author : Venkatesh Rangan. 2. Book : Unbreaking India. Author : Sanjay Dixit 3. Book : India that is Bharat. Author : J Sai Deepak 4. Book : India, Bharat & Pakistan. Author : J Sai Deepak 5. Book : Maharanas. Author : Omendra Ratnu 6. Book : Revolutionaries. Author : Sanjeev Sanyal 7. Book : Ocean of Churn. Author : Sanjeev Sanyal 8. Book : The Hindus of Hindustan. Author : Meenakshi Jain 9. Book : Flight of Deities & Rebirth of Temples. Author : Meenakshi Jain 10. Book : Chronology of India: From Mahabharata to Medieval Era - Vol I. Author : Vedveer Arya 11. Book : Chronology of India: From Mahabharata to Medieval Era - Vol II. Author : Vedveer Arya -> Book number 10 and 11, talks about missing years from Indian History. Over 1380 years have been deleted from indian History in order to adjust them to Biblical timeline of 2000-4000 years by British. Thats why there a lot of confusion fron the times of ancient Indian era to 12th century AD. Vedveer Arya have exposed that. And he has also given talks regarding this on KZbin platform. 12. Book : Brainwashed Republic. Author : Neeraj Atri 13. Book : Savarkar Part 1. Author : Vikram Sampath 14. Book : Savarkar Part 2. Author : Vikram Sampath 15. Book : Bravehearts of Bharat. Author : Vikram Sampath 16. Book : A Brief History Of Science In India. Author : Sabareesh P.A 17. Book : Understanding Mohmad. Author : Ali Sina. -> Its available on internet for free as PDF by the author himself.

[@MediaComment]

Agreed, but on the other side of Sutlej

[@vsukhani]

Ashok was grandson of Chandragupta Maurya. He did not take over per se

[@alamgir5553]

He is referring to the NorthWestern region and the SouthEastern region as a whole. Geographically, Bihar is South and East of Punjab, even if the two regions are not continuous.

[@sundalwood]

یعنی ہم سے سائوتھ میں ہے۔ ڈاکٹر صاحب آئیڈیا بتا رہے ہیں۔

[@yjkbuddy]

Thanks moed for showing the correct map of India..😄

[@vinodbhandari6679]

U r madrsachaap teacher therefore u have build this narrative that there was no bharat before 1947😂

[@numerologysecrets7705]

yes and hindustan Muslims ka mulk ha 😊😊😊😊😊😊

[@priyadarshi8548]

​@@numerologysecrets7705😂 yahi soch ki wajah se aaj ye halat hai musalmano ki

[@gahlawat6764]

@@numerologysecrets7705joker😂😂 tum wo kutti kaum ho jisko koi ghr m jgh dede to tum ghr p apna naam likha lo,,,ek br aa tu india krayenge raaz tujse😂😂😂

[@yjkbuddy]

@@priyadarshi8548 don't waste time bro by commenting bro..dogs tail can never become straight..

[@tarikhinfo]

In the last millennium (1000 AD to 2000 AD), anything north-west of river Indus, came to be considered as non-India and was referred to as "wilayat" and its people as "wilayatis".......a term they used in the meaning of foreigner and later used it for Angraiz. The people of modern-day Punjab were by all essence Indians, and they viewed (and still view) Afghan expeditions in their Punjab as foreign invasions. But the Maratha incursion into Punjab, was not viewed as foreign invasion by Punjabis. Adina Beg (an Arain Punjabi) invited Maratha to expel Afghans from Punjab and stated (according to Tahmas Nama) that we Indians first have to remove Afghans from our soil.

[@mmulbatoora653]

Lol all saints in Punjab came from North lol I don't know what kind of Punjabi you are Martha never reached Punjab lol and who is Adina Beg lol BTW beg are turks lol

[@catchjyoti]

First of all really liked your analysis. Very coherently put. But when you say north is north of Sutlej and south is south of it, then you are saying ti from a person who is sitting in present day Pakistan (or North-West of erstwhile undivided India). But when you think as a person sitting in undivided India, south is south of Vindhyachal mountain and north is north of it. Now within this north region, you of course have the western region with places like Peshawar, Lahore, etc and then eastern region with places like Patliputra (today's Patna). So when Chandragupta Maurya, Ashoka, etc defeated kings ruling in Lahore, Peshawar, etc it was basically East dominating West within northern India. But later on when Marathas conquered a large part of northern and north-western undivided India, they did originate from South-West of undivided India. So in this case you can say South defeating North. From undivided India perspective even Raja Ranjit Singh was northern. So his taking over Peshawar from the Afghans was basically north defeating north. The above is where I have slight difference from your points. But your main thrust that South of undivided India got modern education and institutions much earlier than North is true. And within North too, East and Central parts got is before the west. So that way present day Pakistan had the misfortune of getting them much later.

[@lionkhan6141]

All Pakistani Army Generals past and present are HARAMI and MOTHER FUCKERS.... YEH Fauj aik HARAMI Fauj hai

[@Crail-ok2km]

How come none of you are talking about KPT being sold to UAE ? All irrelevance news being mentioned , no talk about selling of 4 ports of Karachi to UAE ??? Are you oblivious?

[@khittaykachoudhary2360]

Pakistan Ke Parks, Highways, Motorways, Clubs, Golf Courses, Airports, Railway Stations, Ports, Sab Kuch Bikk Gaya Bhaiii😂😂😂 Just Relax And Drink Beer 😎

[@sharmajs1]

Great history lesson. The book Anachary by Dalrymple is a must read if you want to understand British conquest of India.

[@politicalshoeclubstrugglef781]

Well-done doctor, I as a history "buff" and from my ancestral stories found it all out long time ago, when I used to be in school, in my ancestral city of Lahore. I've been living in US, for a long time, and aware of these both subjects, you discussed in this vlogg. Well done 👍

[@lionkhan6141]

All Pakistani Army Generals past and present are HARAMI and MOTHER FUCKERS.... YEH Fauj aik HARAMI Fauj hai

[@nasreenali5631]

Excellent vlog. It’s good to know the history so you can understand the past. Thank you very much!🙏

[@deepakishere-e1d]

Dear Pakistanis if you want to understand the land of your Hindu ancestors then start reading more about the cultural history of Bharat! The only nation which had never lost a cultural war!

[@shashb817]

Reading through the comments I observe that almost all Pakistani viewers commend Dr Pirzada on his intellectual prowess and his knowledge etc while the Indians try and correct or add value to the “knowledge transfer”. We already know this as we have learnt this in school.

[@Javaid96]

That is exactly Dr Pirzada tried to explain, the knowledge penetration in the areas now called Pakistan not at the level as on Indian side. Correction and addition can only come from knowledge, many on Pakistani side are listening this kind of info for the first time thus they are commending DR Pirzada for doing this great vlog.

[@shashb817]

@@Javaid96 This is really a sad state of affairs. How many years before things improve for the common Pakistani then ? Humans all live on hope. Is there no hope ?

[@HiRabba]

Dr Moeed Thanks for your service 👏👏👏👏👏👏👏 You have a gift of communication skills very impressive always hit the dot💯

[@arshadiqbal4125]

Brilliant. A very detailed research based lecture on South Asia. I loved every moment of it. Its very mismerizing and well narrated. Well done Dr. Moeed.

[@vikasbhargava5653]

Certainly a new perspective. One can agree or not is a different thing but certainly food for thought. I'd say a great effort Dr. Moeed in analysing. Anyone with an open mind open to a discussion and NOT argument will enjoy this. I certainly did. Thanks.

[@onlytruth-ep3lv]

Are lodu chand new perspective ka matlab jhooth bolna hota hai kya....gajab chutiye bhare pade hain😭🤣🤪

[@RodeniBaloch]

Balochistan was always an independent state and will be inshaa Allah. Pakistan with Generals is a Curse on humanity.

[@hassanaftab1270]

Balochistan was never a state. It was 4 princely state with quetta municipality.

[@KrishanVermaJi]

Delhi was Inderprastha in Mahabharta time and it was the capital of Pandava. So it's delveloped around 5000 year ago. I know, can understand that you don't know and has very little knowledge about ancient India.

[@sameerahmed1853]

He's talking about history not mythology bro

[@urujchoudhary]

​​@sameerahmed1853i t is not a myth BTW. The geographic locations have all been identified. Kurukshetra, dwaraka, hasitnapur, gandhar etc etc. Bhai please enlighten yourself Sir

[@purnanandyadav844]

Pakistanis have very little knowledge or don't want to acknowledge proper past of india🇮🇳.

[@KrishanVermaJi]

@@sameerahmed1853 After passing 5000 years everything looks like mythology. Even you don't know your forefathers were Hindu, have you remembered anything when you and family converted to Islam, I'm sure you don't know, then how can you know and understand history before 5000 years ago. I can understand it's not your fault brother.

[@sameerahmed1853]

@@KrishanVermaJi honestly bro, you aren't making any sense. Try to look at things in a logical manner, not the prejudicial way

[@naziajahangir9097]

It’s very unfortunate that a large population of even educated Pakistanis don’t see what’s happening outside Pakistani “s politics. Sadly, our politics is like a soap opera which our people follow and awaits next exciting episode We don’t realise what is at stake ? Our youth is so demoralised My neice has just became a medical doctor at the age of 23 and now there are no jobs no future.

[@jameelhussain3718]

Thank you 💕 dr.moeed bhai for taking on a subject hardly youth of Pakistan is interested i.e development of Asian countries from 17th century onward. You have very eloquently described the war strategies of kings and religious authorities and afghan forces. Let me give a short sports activity taking place in a small town Dina and that is a cricket match organized by cricket fans. The matches between few villages around mangla and Dina took place from 8pm to 4am.

[@mmulbatoora653]

When your own home is in fire you don't notice what's happening around you.

[@adilnaseerofficial]

Dear Nazia Jehangir sahiba: it's pretty well-placed that the masses are getting torpid,disillusioned and lethargic day by day. I remember, a few years ago when I graduated in engg, how there was a climate of hope,idealism and ambitions in Pakistan. Maslaw's hierarchy of needs model fully portrays our sad state of affairs. When our basic needs of security and livable conditions are getting harder and harder to be fulfilled, expecting a scholarly view about world affairs becomes a distant dream.

[@Dividerinchief]

Thanks to the Muslims of India who sacrificed their mothers and sisters to the Mughal invaders in the past , we respect u.. Talwar ke darr se salvar pehen liya..

[@asadshah4194]

It was absolutely amazing research and information.thanks

[@onedirectionlover08]

Lesson of this era of history can’t get better via a ‘v-log’ than this one, great job. This ‘North-South’ paradigm is such an important subject that it needs deep study to guide us towards a better future. Well done Dr Moeed 👏 and thanks a lot.

[@worldofsarthak1628]

This is a very interesting take. Interestingly in India in recent times many data points whether be it about diet, or political choices, women empowerment, various attitudes it is seen that the difference is not so much between northern India and southern India as generally conceived but axially between north-west on the one hand and South-east on the other. And this south-east got hold of European knowledge first and remains even now inclined to progressive ideas whereas north-west is comparatively conservative in spirit. One further point which perhaps also needs to be added is that Indian elites started anglicizing but they didn't just anglicise they somehow tried infused (for good or for bad) revivalism within that anglicization. So they both wanted past glory as well as modernity! And this is seen in India. Though there is a tension between modernity and revivalistic tendencies but they also somehow fuse together to create a synergy of sorts. Pakistan on the other hand sitting on the laps of Mohenjodaro and Harappa somehow succeeded in neither taking modernity, nor past but became fixated on just one aspect of Identity - the religious identity. I think you are right that Pakistani expats from the West can play a significant role if you can take que from how significant role the Indian expats are playing for India.

[@alamgir5553]

Ironically, Indian intelligentsia is becoming increasingly fixated on religious identity of Sanatan Dharma, while Pakistani intelligentsia is increasingly becoming critical of the concept of statehood solely reliant on faith for its legitimacy. The two countries will see the consequences of these reversals in the future.

[@ShamshadAhmed-o2k]

Very good study and insight

[@naveedmushtaq5569]

We should spread this in our circle, Its a new way of thinking Excellent analysis

[@aftabpitafi3157]

Thanks for initiating this kind of debate. I have one question regarding this debate: why did British focus only upon Southern side of India while coming for trade via maritime route? Why didn't they choose Sindh too for trade purpose? as Arabian sea is along the coastal side of Sindh and this coastal area has geo strategic and geo economical potential from date back of history?

[@N.K.Khan-403]

Doctor. India’s progress is something to be envied for the neighbouring countries. How long Pakistan will continue to stew on its own juices.?? Woe to the enemies of the state. 😡

[@Sonia_Godfray_Hindu]

internal disquiet in Pakistan, including the unsustainable and unconstitutional interference of the military in civilian affairs, the incompetence of its policy elites, and its dysfunctional economic affairs are the reason why your country is doomed.

[@szk5110]

Well said👌

[@khittaykachoudhary2360]

Pakistan should compete with Afghansitan. There is a lot that Pakistanis can learn from the success of Afghans. Forget About India.

[@ArmageddonIsHere]

_"Woe to the enemies of the state"_ What do you do when those are the very people supposed to be serving the state?

[@AnilSharma-bd1jy]

Dr. Moeed Pirzada ji, I agree with you that Sanatan Dharma is a continuously evolved, reformed process & not a sticky, fanatic faith/ understanding with forced traditions not to be altered, amended, changed. Ofcourse Sanatan faith practicing persons were & are God fearing, giving respect to other religious philosophies & theie practitioners. As such one can't find wars in our subcontinent on the bssis of conflict of religions like the henious battles faught in Arabs Europe, various parts of world. All different Abrahmic religious philosophies came, flourished, public adopted without any hurdle in oue subcontinent. Later invaders, looters only took advantage of religion & started telling differences, calling Sanatan Dharma followers as Hindus (not a good word) in invaders' language just like our Panjabis from whole Panjab call Arbis as Badhu while serving there in gulf nations. There is a no instance of Hindu Muslim conflict before the arrival of The English in our subcontinent. The whole public faught against the invaders irrespective of their religions. Moreover invaders looted all the inhabitants without caring their religions. Emperor Akbar gave us a secular rule quite opposite to othe Mughal Rulers. Emperor Aurangzeb used moulvi mafia to kill his brothers, to put father Shah Jahan in jail & captured the throne. In return Emperor Aurangzeb allowed moulvi mafia to unleash terror, torture on non muslims & results are known. In the recent past Maharaja Ranjit Singh gave Panjab a secular rule like Shivaji Maratha gave to Maharashtra & adjoing areas. Like Emperor Aurangzeb, Jinnah too used religious card to please PM Winston Churchill of UK & also hatched a consperacy with The English Rulers.Jinnah was a Mir Jaffer or Mir Sadiqe for Indians especially for muslims & very more for Muslims who preferred to stay in Gandhiji's India & are flourishing & their number grew from three crores to twenty five crores which is more than the total population of pakistan & there is no Mian Mithu in Sanatni Hindu forcing conversions upon muslims under the fear of law & media. Ofcourse many like Mian Mithu in Pakistan protected by govt., Miltestablishment togather are indulged in dirty conversations. former PM IK repeatedly announce many Mir Jaffers, Mir Sadiqs in Pakistan. History reveals that 1857 revolt was initiated, faught by Brahmans of UP, MP, Bihar, Bangal, announced Bahadur Shah Zafar as emperor of India cooperated by all in India, but not cooperated by muslims, Sikhs of Panjab & all Pathans of NWEF. Patliputra in Bihar, now called Patna was the capital of Maurya Dynasty & kingdom spread over Afghanistan, part of Iran without four sourheren states which were ruled by another Dynasty for long three hundred years. I am thankful to you for very informative vlog. Pakistan can economically develop only with secular democracy with free media. I have full hope that social media in Pakistan is spreading awareness in Pakistan & an aware society only can bring peaceful change in a nation. Thanks.

[@wordseller631]

We Pathans and Punjabis of Pakistan took pride for centuries as military race like Gorkhas and Sikhs of India, but actually we were less littrate than Central and South Indians; who refused to get abused by British as their mercenary forces. I agreed with you, North of Sutlaj can not be compatible with South of Sutlaj in western democracies.❤❤❤

[@nitishkumar-kc5hv]

good preview ,but u should make note which is u used to do ,because it lack substance and have factual error

[@AbdulRahman-yc7bl]

Very fine presentation. .....yes education and modern scientific knowledge are the decisive factors for bringing about the desired change in the future and fate of a nation or country. .

[@sundusshahid3485]

V. Informative . mashAllah. Thanku for raising our thought process.

[@sammyb.8431]

Great observation and attempt to understand the psyche of people in north and south of the subcontinent. Thank you

[@khurshidalam7766]

EXCELLENT COURAGE, THANKS.

[@ramanvits]

Delhi ka real name ... Indraprastha tha.. You have a lake of knowledge about bharat

[@edwardjohn5507]

Illiterate indian its lack not lake.🤣🤣

[@rafiuddinshah5145]

Sir Voice is low please use a good mic 🎤

[@QabilAGhor]

There was NEVER any country called "India" or "Bharat" until August 15, 1947. One has to go all the way back to Mauryan Empire to come anywhere close to what is now India. But the boundaries of Mauryan Empire are simply based on names mentioned in ancient texts and it's not clear if those place-names were actually part of the empire. That is why there are many different maps of the extent of the Mauryan Empire, none of which include southern India. The word "India" is derived from the Sindhu, the Indus River, and for Persians who named it "Hind," it simply represented a region around the Indus River and beyond. This was later adopted by Arabs who then distinguished Sindh from Hindh because Sindh had become part of the Omayyad Empire. The word "Bharat" was also some region in India, like Siberia in Russia, which never had any boundaries. Even when the British ruled the Subcontinent, it was called the British Raj, Burma was part of it, and the Viceroy of India also handled affairs of the Trucial States which are now UAE, Bahrain and Qatar. The Subcontinent was always a region, like Europe, which consisted of various kingdoms, the Western regions of which were often part of the Persian Empire, Greeco-Bacterian Kingdom, Omayyad Empire, and later Afghan kingdoms, all of which left their mark (and progeny) in this rich cultural mix. Since the area that is now Pakistan was closer to Afghanistan and the Middle East, it was more influenced by them, both culturally, religiously and ethnically. India always has had dozens of ethnic groups, just it had many kingdoms. To say that there was some "Hindu" ethnic group would be historically and scientifically wrong. Because of conquests and migrations (mostly due to Mongol invasions in Central Asia) ethnic makeup of the Muslim population in the Subcontinent began to change around 1000-1200 AD. It was also state policy among Muslim rulers of India to encourage Muslim immigration from Central Asia and sometimes the entire armies consisted of Mamluk soldiers. Immigrants and soldiers were given land grants, so they could survive in their adopted homeland. [This has been recorded in my own family history which goes back to hundreds of years]. Over time, these immigrants married locals and were so fully assimilated into the local culture that it was hard to distinguish them from the native population. Thus the "ethnic mix" among Muslims was not the same as among the "ethnic mix" of the larger Hindu population. Since Islam rejected the notion of "caste," "Muslim" became an identity by itself. I know that both Indians and Pakistanis try to create an Indian or Pakistani identity but make a terrible mistake by confusing religion with ethnic and national identities. Each person has many MANY identities. One can be Hindu and be American, British, Indonesian, Surinamese or Guyanese. It takes hundreds or perhaps thousands of years for national identities to develop. Hardly any country now has just one ethnic or religious group. National identities are lot more complex and have to do with commonality of purpose, ideals, and culture rather than ethnicity. This is why even the UN speaks of "self-determination" rather than imposition of an identity on any group.

[@shivamtyagi8806]

you must have come by the news that indian aviation industry has ordered 500 plus commercial flight from both boeing as well as Airbus while your PM is begging for $1 billion dollar 💵 to save punjab from being default. Yes I intentionally said Punjab becaue Sharif's jurisdictions is upto Punjab only

[@artculture1711]

Yours is a typical islamist pov .. & hence easily debunkable. India has always through out its history of thousands of years been a civilastional nation. Country is a relatively new concept the world over. Pakistan may be a new country today .. but it is still a part of Indian civilisational nation. Your unease with this fact is none of anybody's concern. You may keep reciting your islamist pov & insecure pakistan studies style assuaging of personal humiliation in which ever way you feel comfortable with. You have already witnessed where it has taken pakistan to, in the past 75 years since it was manufactured. But lage raho bhai. Jo apni mitti ko bhoolta hai .. mitti bhi usse bhula deti hai.

[@bvshenoy7259]

QabilAGhor, *You may still have to go back many millennia to know why India is called Bharat. Indus-Sarswati culture also called Indus valley civilization during 6000 BCE to 1900 BCE was so vast encompassing 1.5 million sq.kms. From Mehrgarh (Balochistan) to Shortugal in present Pakistan and Kalibangan, Rakhigarhi and other Saraswati sites near Delhi to Lothal and Daimabad(submerged ruins in gulf of Khambhat - Gujarat ) in south western India. According to Vedic chronology many great Bharata kings and others of equal prominence ruled in India had close contact with the cities in the Indus valley civilization area.*

[@madmax-bu6wh]

Bharat was the son of Pururva thousands of years back who ruled India.

[@WajahatShah-pf1rs]

Very informative and interesting!!! 🎉

[@houstonians5260]

Doctor Sahab, AOA, excellent study and transfer of knowledge. I think you are doing an amazing job, keep it up, and continue with this great work. 👍 Pakistan Zindabad

[@Jamilesma]

This was a brilliant session, shedding light on the most important factor that I've heard for the first time: the factor that can be considered a defining element of our current behavior, vision (lack of vision as to say) and bit of rigidness. You should be doing more sessions on global power play as well. Cheers!

[@mustafakamal1765]

Amazing,❤ The bottom line is..exercise of power isnt the sustainable solution instead to human prospirity,trading,is through education. Knowledge is power.

[@akhtarosman7765]

Moed sahib you are good in connecting dots. Thanks for giving a guide line for analyses!

[@zulfiqarmahmood8015]

I've been watching your vlogs for some time now especially for my own education, I wish more people would benefit from it like me. The fact is that such vlogs are needed so that we can eliminate the unnecessary bias within us and understand the need for healthy competition with India, I cry like a baby when I realize that India has developed so much as a country and institutions that people like Modi are highly respected in those countries where he was considered a professional gangster, this understanding was not achieved before these vlogs. The historical background of the subcontinent you painstakingly presented to us is very important and especially insightful, I will watch this vlog again. What has been clearly understood is that we must now understand that Pakistan has fallen far behind India as a nation, now we have to remove these weaknesses from within ourselves and put ourselves on the path of development. It has to be done, my heart wants me to say here while speaking the dialogue of the film, O rulers, give us back those fifty years of ours, which you people took away from us because of your lust.

[@baazinews1027]

It is okay brother, don't be sad. I am from India, and i can understand you. You should compete with Afghanistan and Nepal because they have $9 Billion and $10 Billion Forex Reserves, while Pakistan now has only $3.5 Billion. It will be best if you forget India and Bangladesh and focus on Nepal, Sri Lanka and Afghanistan.

[@artculture1711]

Of course your "elites" are responsible for your pathetic condition .. but don't excuse yourself, the common people of pakistan & its society from your own responsibility too. Your problems are more 'fundamental' .. but it would be 'blasphemous' to talk about them in pakistan. Nothing good can happen with Pakistan until they 'renounce' their 'fundamental' problem. Kucchh samjhe biraadar ?

[@ARShanker]

Your prejudice of our PM itself is telling You people run for the Elite's needs and narrative until this continues there will continue to search for a messiah who make a better pakistan and that will lead to your Establish control The day when you people make your narrative the real pakistan will born

[@1525boy]

@@baazinews1027Not Sri Lanka 🇱🇰, it’s too far ahead.

[@RizHassan]

@gvs, is your email listed on this channel functional?

[@jauhariakash]

You rightly pointed out historically we were not 'Hindus', but we were Rajputs, Maratha, Bengali, Tamil and so on. Again you are right, if we were united as Hindus, the muslim/turks/persian invaders would not have conquered India/Bharat.

[@vinodbhandari6679]

Agreed however nothing has changed we r still not hindus

[@NisarAhmad-bb6tm]

Excellent talk.

[@abrarshah7533]

Dr Moeed Pirzada you are Great ❤❤❤❤❤

[@saleemc]

Simply brilliant. The depth of knowledge was amazing. This means because we got Rawalpindi we are doomed.

[@aneesamahmood2104]

😂😂 😢

[@shobhitdagur1086]

It's Kingdom of Bappa Rawal

[@talhashahid3596]

Thank you for informative Vlog. Let me summarize this as follows: 1. Trading was established in Bombay, Delhi, Calcutta, etc. 2. Military was established in Rawalpindi, Peshawar, Gilgit, Multan, Quetta. By these two points, we can easily see the difference.

[@VickySharma-oz3vp]

Again a pakistani telling the wrong history to boast his PoV😂

[@muhammadghaznain2860]

you gave a different perspective of the history ,thanks for enlightening your viewers ,keep going

[@tausifanjum5339]

Dr. Sahib, is this (GVS) your channel?

[@drishfaqkhan786able]

Dr Moeed I fully support and agree with your vision and way forward. I always tried to convince the community to work on knowledge/ education / learning/ utilisation of energy of younger people for their development to benefit the community to exploit the untapped potential of younger generation in modern world

[@avinashmishra7735]

On one hand these Pakistanis take pride in Islamic invaders for destroying kafir temples, naming mountains as Hindukush, forcing jaziya on Hindus, converting people in mass, making harems out of Hindu women, breaking India on communal lines. Andon the other hand he is saying it was never about battle of religions bcoz Hinduism was never a religion.🤣🤣 Muslims from India have written letters to Afghans asking them to attack Delhi. It's well documented that Aurangzeb gave Hindu kings options to either die or conver to Islam. Yet this man is claiming it was never about civilizational battle (Islam vs Hinduism). He is saying Maratha had muslims in ther armies and Afghans had Hindus in their army. So what? Modi and RSS has also kept some Muslims in his party. Will you now accept Modi is not anti-Islam? Islam has taken refuge of kaffar's secularism for far too long. Hindutva has risen after 1000 years to not only end the evils (like Caste System, Gandhism) within Hinduism but also to end the enemy of Dharma. All scores will be settled. Moeed you must know Hinduism is not at the loggerheads with Islam only but Christianity as well. You will witness us engaging in a long battle against Missionaries in India mass-converting people with the power of Vatican Wealth. Hidutva will prove development does not need minority appeasing secularism. Hindutva will show the world how to teat Islam on the basis of Mutual Respect. Game is ON.

[@Liptan-di-cha]

Awesome presentation, I learned the idea, thanks.

[@abdulhafeezkhan475]

Yes very excellent analysis Moaid Sb, please keep it up 👍.

[@sultankuku]

Thanks Dr Moeed, I really like your historical vlog!

[@iqtidarbaig8532]

Moria's and Ashok were of northern part. Geography can't be changed . One can't shift Taxla and today's Patna to south .

[@currentnewsandanalysis4261]

Patana is in bihar where chandragupta born and taxila where chanakya the stubborn Brahmin leader born.

[@avishekbhattacharjee812]

Maurya*, Ashoka*

[@bilaltariq366]

Nice. Thanx

[@abrmuni569]

Looking at the Indian comments, it seems they are also taught history their own controlled ways. Most of Moeed's contents refer to Western literature but they think it is a comedy.

[@VickySharma-oz3vp]

It is most of it. Geographical referring is wrong maurya was from present day Bihar which is in north not south, South india had other empires like cholas marathas n all so he researched it but he researched selfishly

[@abrmuni569]

@@VickySharma-oz3vp You have to give him some leeway about his bearing. His origin is Kashmir. Everything below him is south. In Punjabi, south direction is called Deccan (modern day Telangana) and north is Parbat (means mountain). It does not mean there are no mountains south of Punjab. He did mix Mauryan and Gupta empires though. He is right about the word Hindu as a single religious entity. Looking at the millennia of history of "Bharat", it is a very recent phenomenon taken from British colonial literature.

[@VickySharma-oz3vp]

@@abrmuni569 its not about that he is right or wrong its about his intentions behind it and they are not right for sure

[@abrmuni569]

@@VickySharma-oz3vp Good thing you mentioned about his intention. We should all correct his telling of the facts. No one can fully judge or control someone's intention. Allow me to assume he offends many Indians. You might be surprised, he offends even more Pakistanis because they are not taught what he is telling them. A typical Pakistani does not listen to such "disinformation". That was the gist of my first comment of this thread. Delighted to interacting with you.

[@VickySharma-oz3vp]

@@abrmuni569 appreciate your response. Well if he is doing it knowing that the mentality of pakistani ppl then it becomes worst thsn what their establishment is doing to them. Half knowledge or you can say "disinformation" can do more damage to a society.

[@qayyumwasiq]

بہت عمدہ معلوماتی لیکچر۔ پاکستانیوں کو ایسی تعلیم کی شدید ضرورت ہے۔

[@Captain.Jackk01]

Islam... Convert, Zajiya or Fight, Islam is conversion factory.

[@Allabouthelicopter]

Dr Sab what’s was ur point ? Or can somebody tell what was his point ?

[@Payalpatel71257]

Patliputra the modern city Patna capital of Bihar

[@haroonmirza4453]

Excellent information very good anylisis in depth information

[@mohitcharan2835]

I am from india 🇮🇳🇮🇳 I just want to ask one question to all the pakistanis.... Question :- can you name a single king who fullfill 3 conditions.. 1. Born in Pakistan 2.ruled over Pakistan 3. Todays Pakistani respect him.

[@mtsardar]

Raja Rangit Singh

[@ArmageddonIsHere]

​@@mtsardar You didn't even spell his name right!😂

[@yarkhattak2997]

Hi, can u name one from India ??? Thanks

[@urban-cultivator]

Ranjit Singh was born in Gujrawala

[@mayankumar1312]

@@yarkhattak2997seriously… like seriously

[@read7641]

Excellent pov! Never thought of it like that.

[@Insights9969]

Doc, I watch your v logs very attentively for educational purposes being a teacher of pak studies . I must share with you that I was giving a realistic view to my students ,which was quite contrary to what was being depicted in our books .But since regime change , we are also under pressure and fear to talk about realities ..

[@mudassarahmad3186]

بہت بہت شکریہ،

[@neilmichael2676]

Thank you for the crash course on the etymology of the word India, Dr. Sb!etymology...didn't know it!! Enjoyed the vlog today!!

[@masoodkhan9638]

MashAllah very informative thanks

[@faisalajmal1575]

Dr sb just to correct one small point, the Morias were also Aryans from the north. Original inhabitants of these areas were Dravidians of South India and they never conquered the north.

[@rahuldravid8723]

Ye KZbin ka sabse achha video hai .. Thank you so much for explaining in such detail in a very simple way

[@TheOpeningleader]

Very impressive historical analysis of Indian history. You are a wonderful historian as well 😊❤️

[@amitkulkarni910]

It was very informative and it does make sense in terms of the present state based on the arguments presented by you. Great job.

[@luckysingh2231]

Regarding attacks on India. I want to share few things. Hardly people know what actually happened with India from the times of Arabs to british. Let me tell you in short and summarised way (in below comments rest will include) : PART 1 - Prologue PART 2 - Arabs Vs Indians PART 3 - Why we failed to counter the Turks PART 4 - Ray of hope called Chatrapati Shivaji and rise of The Maratha Empire PART 5 - Decline of Maratha Empire infront of British PART 6 - Period 1818-1857 & 1857 war against british PART 7 - British rule between 1857 -1947 PART 8 - Some books recommendations to read PART 1 - Prologue 1. Turkic are those who came from & belong to people of modern day Kyrgyztan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, & Tajikistan.And they invaded Anatolia and renamed it as Turkey. Otherwise Anatolia was originally and actually the part of Greece. This is the reason why people of modern day Turkey looks like European and not like Uzbekis, Tajiks or Turkmenistanis , better to say Turks. 2. When I say Hindus it comprises modern day Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhist and Jains. They all belong to one Dharmic Traditions. British made division in order to divide the Dharmic society & later on further divided Hindus into castes. They made division and classification among hindus bcos they were constantly facing the revolts from hindus even after 1857, and it was getting difficult to control India & they thought if this continues then they might lose the control over India. So in order to keep the hindus in check, they made those division and classification. I would suggest you to check out Puneet Sahani's talks on KZbin.He has exposed these things with facts, esp regarding how sikhs were separated from Sanatan Dharm (Hinduism) by the british. And by the way, caste is actually derived from Portuguese word 'Casta' . So it is actually a European concept not even an Indian concept & in order to break our spirit & make us feel inferior & embarrased of ourselves with loser mindset, they distorted & manipulated our history. And all these things are documented in 1871 British India Census Documents, Mcaulay writings, etc. Infact during the british era, there were more than 500 princely states, among them over 400 princely states belong to Shudra (low caste) Kings. I suggest u to watch a documentary of Channel - Prachyam , video titled - Sahebs Who Never Left (Documentary) . 3. Regarding Indian History,which unfortunately we r not taught correctly bcos of distortion by British which was designed in such a way that to make us feel inferior. As George Orwell said - “The most effective way to destroy people is to deny and obliterate their own history'. There is a proverb that says, “Until the lion tells the story, the hunter will always be the hero.” No wonder instead of reading History of Indians, We read history of outsiders. And till now we read history which was designed by british. And it is a big shame for all of us. Like for eg - one fact that over 1380 years have been deleted from the Indian history in order to adjust it into biblical timeline which is limited in nature i.e 2000-4000 years. Prof Vedveer Arya has written books on this & has given challenge to western historians on this.Vedveer Arya has given his talks on KZbin. OR Aryan Invasion Theory, which was designed to create animosity between North India Vs South India. Infact it has been proven wrong by many people. And this theory now has been debunked many people now. So, there are plenty of things like this. PART 2 - Arabs Vs Indians.

[@luckysingh2231]

PART 2 - Arabs Vs Indians When Arabs were at their peak and till that time whole Persia Iraq,Syria ,Egypt have fallen in front of Arab Caliphate and expanding their faith , they were defeated by the Indians. Abu Bakr was made caliph after Muhmmad died. 634: Two years later, Umar I became caliph after Abu Bakr's death. Umar I reigned till 644. 636/637: During Umar I's reign, the first ever battle between Arabs Vs Indians took place, It was a naval battle b/w Indians Vs Arabs but the arabs were defeated by Chalukya Pulakeshin II. The Indians under the command of Pulakeshin 2 thrashed the Arab army which was under the Caliph Umar. The attack was repelled with Indians victory over Arabs. 637-643: Another attack on Bharuch was made by Arabs on al-Hakam's orders. Bharuch was then ruled by probably Dadda 2 Gurjara( Lāṭa)/Vijayarāja Chalukya, depending on exact year of attack. This attack was also a Gurjara/Chalukya victory for Indians. 643 : al-Hakam ordered invasion of Sindh,Chachnama declares it Indians victory. Sindh was then ruled by Chach of Alor (Aror). Arabs didn't gain anything by this naval attack on the port of Debal (Karachi), the Indians won. The news of Arab defeat in Sindh was a serious anomaly for the Caliph's ears, which were habituated to hearing of victories in whichever direction the Arab armies went. Such was the demoralisation, that even the next Caliph Uthman, didn't dare attack India till his death. 663: In the reign of Caliph Ali, al-Harith raided the area of Kikanan (Kalat-Sibi area in Pakistan).The Arab commander was killed & Arabs were repelled. During ~660-680, 6+ Arab attacks took place on Kikanan. But, the Indians resisted and Arabs didn't gain any territory despite frequent attacks. Thereafter till 705 CE, the Caliphate experienced multiple civil wars. Kabul & Zabul Indian rulers defeated Arabs twice during this period. 708-711 CE : In the reign of Caliph al-Walid I, al-Hajjaj (Governor of Iraq) sent two Arab armies to attack Raja Dahir of Sindh. Raja Dahir first defeated the Arabs near Debal & killed Ubaidullah.Al-Hajjaj sent another commander, Budail, from from Oman to attack Sindh.Budail fought with Jaisimha, Dahir's son & was killed by Jaisimha. Arabs were again defeated at the frontiers of India & many are not aware before Raja Dahir got defeated, there were many battle between many battle between Arabs Vs Indians & those wars were won by Indians. The battle Arab won was of Mohammad Bin Qasim bcos Raja Dahir of Sindh have given refuge to some Arabs when there was Civil war between Arab & they betrayed him. But later on when the news reached to the ears of Bappa Rawal & he not only thrashed Arabs from Sindh but also thrashed & chased the Arabs upto Iran & made check posts all the way from Iran to India. Probably this is the reason why Iranian r not fully Arabised & they still celebrate Pre Islamic festivals like Nauroz etc. Later on Arabs were defeated by Indians under The Great Indian Emperor Samrat Lalitaditya Muktapida, whose Empire extended right from Bay of Bengal to Caspian Sea. The defeat of Arabs by The Great Lalitaditya was very humiliating for Arabs. After defeating Arabs, Lalitaditya ordered left over Arab soldiers to shave off half their heads as a symbol of their submission to Lalitaditya. Then Arabs were again thrashed by Indians under Mihir Bhoj & Rawal Khuman 2. How Arabs Described Mihir Bhoj - Arab chronicle of Suleiman states that - Mihir Bhoj king of Jurz. Among the princes of India,there is no greater foe of there is no greater foe of Muhammadan faith than he. And Rawal Khuman II fought the arabs and defeated the Abbasid Caliph army led by Al-Ma’mun . It was kind of a final encounter between Arabs Vs Indians. Khuman II fought the arabs & defeated Abbasid Caliph army led by Al-Ma’mun. It was kind of a final encounter between Arabs Vs Indians. Rawal Khuman II defeats arabs & captures their general Mahmud. Khuman’s victory over Mahmud was conclusive & since it was the army of the Caliphate ,it completely demoralised the Arabs. Mahmud was held captive by Khuman.He was let go after extracting heavy penalties from Arabs. So Indians didn't face any problem while dealing with Arabs. The problem Indians faced was actually against Turkic people & Turkic are people belonging to central Asia that is modern day Kyrgyztan ,Uzbekistan, Tajikistan & Turkmenistan.The mughals actually came from Uzbekistan. So they were all Uzbekis. So against the Arabs , Indians did not face problems but it was actually against the Turks, we faced problems that too bcos of our own foolishness *NOTE -Turks are those who belong to people of modern day Kyrgyztan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, & Tajikistan.And they invaded Anatolia and renamed it as Turkey. Otherwise Anatolia was originally and actually the part of Greece. This is the reason why people of modern day Turkey looks like European and not like Uzbekis,Tajiks or Turkmenistanis better to say Turks. So against the Arabs , Indians did not face problems but it was actually against the Turks, we faced problems that too bcos of our own foolishness. PART 3 - Why we failed to counter the Turks

[@luckysingh2231]

PART 3 - Why we failed to counter the Turks *NOTE -Turks are those who belong to people of modern day Kyrgyztan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, & Tajikistan.And they invaded Anatolia and renamed it as Turkey. Otherwise Anatolia was originally and actually the part of Greece. This is the reason why people of modern day Turkey looks like European and not like Uzbekis,Tajiks or Turkmenistanis better to say Turks. *By the way, all these Ghori were Tajiks (Turks), Gznavi, Khilji , Tughlaq etc were all belonged to Khallaj Tribe which is actually a Turk Tribe. They islamised the whole Afghanistan after the fall of last Hindu King of Afghanistan , Jaypal. The first serious Turk settlement happened in 1206 with start of Slave Dynasty in Delhi. And all other later dynasties after them were called Delhi Sultanates. And their actual rule was just limited to Delhi and nearby areas and later on they were overtaken by Mughals who came from Uzbekistan. And mughals were Turks too. Initial Turkic attack happen in Afghanistan in Battle of Peshwar (1001), King Jayapal wid Bhatti Rajputs fought against these turkic invaders though first SERIOUS Turk attack happen in 1025 & King Suheldev defeat these Turk led by Salar Maqsud in 1025. But later on why we failed to counter them in later years esp from 1200s onwards.Bcos of following reason a) Over dependence on Horses - 50% (b) Not understanding the islamic ideology - 30% -> A common reason for others too (c) Not being united - 10% (d) Miscellaneous Reasons - 10% 1. Bcos our Kings were over confident & not united. 2. This is the most important reason which comprises of 50% reason as i mentioned. It all started with mistakes by Hindu Shahi Dynasty of Afghanistan when they lose their grip over Central Asia particularly over Southern part of Central Asia & they didn't bother to establish their influence over their again.And why Central Asia was so important bcos all the Indian Kings used to get their majority horses from there. As Central Asian Horses were considered the best. In mediaeval time horses were the engine of any army.And unfortunately the Indian Kings from 500 A.D. onwards have started shifting their military tactics slowly, from being Infantry to cavalry that is horse based.And with each new century years passed,this dependency process speeds up. Its not that horses are not there in India. There are Indian breed horses. But Central Asian Horses were far more superior as compare to Indian horses. So Indian Kings used to have horses even the Indian breed horses,but they never depended on them on the primary level when it comes to military. Horses were always seen as an additional strength for the military. And infantry was the strength of Indian Kings from the Ancient Vedic times ,this is the reason why infantry marital art was developed in India. The natural military strength of the Indians was always - Infantry, Elephants & Naval Power. Even though there are several reason why they did that by shifting military tactic from infantry to cavalry. But if I have to choose one reason among many,then in short they did bcos - dusre ki thaali hamesha achi lagti hai. This happened bcos when Indian Emperor Skandgupta defeated Huns* & we Indians have established our supremacy over Eastern Hun Empire,esp Central Asian Region.And from their onwards Indians started shifting their military tactic from infantry to cavalry. It's not that people didn't caution them not to have over dependence on Horses & infact also stick to your natural strength that is infantry.And one can use cavalry as additional military method but dont let go off your natural strength that is infantry. But no one really bothered. And once the grip was lose over Central Asia. It created problem. And there was sudden collapse in the military structure & everything fall like a pack of cards. And the dynasties which didn't shifted their 100% strength to Cavalry & stick to their natural strength,those dynasties survived & defeated these invaders like Vijayanagar Dynasty, Gajapati dynasty, Ahom dynasty etc. Infact Ahom Dynasty of North East India defeated mughals more than 17 times. Both Vijayanagar & Gajapati Dynasty were got destroyed bcos of some other reason which I will explain later. *Huns = Huns were considered a dangerous force in the world at one point of time. The Huns were nomadic warriors who terrorized much of Europe and the Roman Empire in the 4th and 5th centuries A.D. The terror which the Huns caused over the Europe and the Roman Empire is something un-imaginable. Its was the Huns, who were responsible for the annihilation of Roman Empire. And with invasion of their Capital Rome in 452 AD, the Roman Empire was wiped out. But the force, which used to terrorize whole europe was defeated by Indian Emperor Skandgupta. The Hunas, under the leadership of Toramana, suffered a crushing defeat by the Indian Emperor Skandagupta in 458 AD 3. They all failed to understand religious ideology of invaders.Bcos even after loosing grip over Central Asia. We still won many battles like - Taimur Lang was defeated by Jograj Singh Gurjar in 1398. And the defeat was so devastating for Taimur that he literally fled India OR Ruler of Gajapati Empire (Eastern Ganga Dynasty) defeated these invaders in 1248 & many more etc. So Indians still won many battles but they were so naive that they didn't understand that enemies they are facing. They all failed to understand the religious ideology of invaders. Bcos even after loosing grip over Central Asia. The Kings still won many battles but they were so naive that they didn't understand that enemies they are facing are not your typical enemies. They are all driven by ideology of Islamic Zealotry.

[@luckysingh2231]

4. Over Confidence, being naive & foolishness. Even though there are so many examples but I will give you few examples among many examples : Queen Naiki Devi defeated Ghori in 1178 but instead of chopping his head she let him go free OR Another eg : After defeating & capturing Mohmad Ghori in 1191, Prithviraj Chauhan releases Mohammad Ghori in 1191. And this proved to be a heavy mistake for Prithviraj Chauhan OR Alaudin Khalji was defeated in battle in 1488 by Badal-Gora OR another eg - Rana Hammir Singh defeats Muhammad bin Tughluq in 1326 and captured Mohammad bin Tughlaq & jailed him for 6 months and then let him free. Another eg - Rana Sanga defeated invaders like Ibrahim Lodhi, Sultan of Delhi in Battle of Khatoli (1517) and Battle of Dholpur (1518) . And Rana Sanga also defeats & capturs Malwa Sultan Mahmud Khilji II in 1519.Later on he defeats Gujarat Sultan Malik Hussain in 1520. Malik Hussain surrender in front of Rana Sanga & he later took all the wealth of Gujarat. Later in the same year, Rana Kumbha defeats the coalition army of two sultanate of Gujarat and Malwa. And with this Rana Sanga became the supreme power in the Northern India. After Babur (Founder of Mughal Dynasty) capturing Delhi, Babur decided to attack Rana Sanga as soon as possible. In a two months long battle between the Turko Mongol army of Babur & Rana Sanga took place in Bayana (near Agra). The Mughals got defeated & & were forced to retreat to Agra. This time Rana Sanga didn’t follow the policy of wiping out the invading enemies as he did against the Sultans of Malwa & Gujarat. He was sure that from this defeat Babur will not attack him and this gave Babur enough time to recover & to recover & prepare for the final climax at Khanwa, which was the first and the last defeat of Rana Sanga. The undefeated Rana Sanga had finally made a miscalculated move and this proved to be a heavy mistake on his part. Another eg : Maharana Pratap when he defeated 3rd Mughal King Akbar in Battle of Dewair (1582) ,he had the golden opportunity to grab the Delhi Throne and when everything was going in his favour, he just let that idea go away. Maharana Pratap not understanding that they are not your typical enemies, infact the aim is Jihad & expand their ideology. And there are many examples like this. And there are many examples like these. Not understanding islamic ideology has been a big problem of Indian Kings. Stupidity like many of mughal expansion was done by some Indian Kings bcos many Indians kings had ego tussle & internal conflict between them. So it was obvious, outsiders will take advantage of this. Like - it was Raja Man Singh who expanded Mughal Empire by defeating & subduing old kingdoms of Bengal, Bihar and Odisha and also conquered Kabul for 3rd Mughal King Akbar. Infact, in mughal empire, the land right from from Kabul to Bengal was actually conquered by Indian King Raja Man Singh when he allied with 3rd Mughal King Akbar as there was ego tussle between Raja Man Singh and Maharana Pratap. That's a different story altogether. There was also a big issue with Indian Kings that once they have given their word to someone, they always maintain that at any cost. And these invaders always took advantage of this. And this has been a big problem of Indian Kings esp from 13th century onwards, when they have given their word to someone they fully respected it & maintained it as it was a matter of pride for them and it was seen as a manly thing, a sign of masculinity. But whenever the enemy got a chance to violate it & defeat the Indian Kings, they always did. 5. Another example : When Humayun (Father of 3rd Mughal King Akbar) was leaving they get refuge in Amarkot in Sindh by King Rana Prasad. He gave refuge to Humayun and his family who were struggling at that time. Not understanding the islamic ideology. Later on these were the same Mughals who butchered the people in order to spread islam. * You gave invaders one chance, they will come and annihiliate you. Like people of Anatolia gave one chance to Turks and Turks captured Anatolia, destroyed them and islamised them completely. And unfortunately our ancestors gave invaders multiple chances to revive and attack us

[@luckysingh2231]

6. Indians were fighting among themselves too. Like the downfall of Gajapati Empire was bcos of continous attacks by Vijayanagar Dynasty from the south.Gajapati Empire (Formerly knownn as Eastern Ganga Dynasty). It defeated the invaders multiple times & later on decided to march towards Delhi & finish this mess once & for all. But it got attacks from its southern part from The Vijayanagar Dynasty. This diverted Gajapati Empire's attention & they got busy in fighting the Vijaynagar Dynasty. And this gave Foreign Invading Army of Delhi Sultanate to revive itself and attack when they saw the opportunity. With the decline of Eastern Ganga Dynasty (later on came to be known as Gajapati Empire) , The Vijaynagar Dynasty captured the Southern part of Gajapati Empire (Eastern Ganga Dynasty 7. Employing these Central Asian people in their Army as commanders and generals. Best eg - Vijayanagar Empire. The capital of Vijayanagar Empire was considered the finest capital in the whole world. And they were very powerful Kingdom. But in Battle of Talikota which was a fight between Vijayanagar Empire Vs Bahamani Sultanate and outsiders like Gilani brothers, who were appointed as commanders of Vijayanagar Army & betrayed King Rama Raya in the name of jihad against kafir & supporting the invader islamic army and boom , the Empire Collapsed. 8. And most shocking the Indians were fighting the Indians. Like during the initial period of Mughal time, the many warriors in army of mughals were actually Indians. And there is a problem with a Polytheists culture like Hinduism , Greeks, Pagan culture etc that they all easily accept the belief system of others bcos in their own Polytheists culture there are many gods and belief system so accepting a new system is not an issue for them. And this is here problem arise with monotheistic religion like Islam and Christianity that says our God is the only true God & your God is fake. And this is here Polytheists failed to understand their ideology. 9. Finally, among all invaders, mughals establish themselves as the supreme power in India. Mughals came from modern day Uzbekistan. Mughals had turkic - Mongolian genes and they came from Central Asian region, specifically from modern day Uzbekistan. From 1526 onwards, From 1526 onwards, Mughal Empire gets founded by Babur when Babur captures Delhi but later on his son Humayun (2nd Mughal King) was forced into exile when he lost battles in 1539 & 1540. He then gets shelter & refuge by Sindh King Rana Prasad. With arrival of Akbar (son of Humayun & 3rd Mughal King) , at that time Vikramaditya Hemu was sitting at Delhi Throne and he controlled an area right from Bengal to Delhi and some areas beyond it. Abul Fazl (court historian of Akbar) noted that prior to battle of panipat,Hemu had fought & won all 22 battle & never lost any battle. Akbar fights Hemu & defeats Hemu in 2nd Battle of Panipat (1556) & finally establish mughals as supreme power esp. in the northern India. And with the help of Raja Man Singh of Jaipur, mughal empire established themselves as the strongest empire of North India. It was Raja Man Singh who expanded Mughal Empire from Kabul-Kandahar in the North West to Bengal in the east by defeating & subduing old kingdoms of Bengal, Bihar and Odisha and also conquered Kabul-Kandahar for 3rd Mughal King Akbar. Infact, in mughal empire, the land right from from Kabul to Bengal was actually conquered by Indian King Raja Man Singh when he allied with 3rd Mughal King Akbar as there was ego tussle between Raja Man Singh and Maharana Pratap. That's a different story altogether. And the exact geographical area of Mughal Empire was - Kabul Kandahar in the North West to Bengal in the east and to Satpura range in the frontiers of deccan. And below mughal empire, there was Ahmednagar Sultanate, Bijapur Sultanate and Golcondas. And below them there was scattered areas which were left, after the fall of Vijayanagar Empire. Part 4 : Ray of Hope called Chatrapati Shivaji & Rise of The Maratha Empire

[@luckysingh2231]

PART 4 : Ray of Hope called Chatrapati Shivaji & Rise of The Maratha Empire 1. In Indian History if there is any hero then that title should be given to Legend Chatrapati Shivaji. Why?Bcos this legend literally saved whole civilisation,against all odds,when all other civilisation were wiped out by Abrahamic Faiths & Islamist & there was no hope left. 2. Chatrapati Shivaji was born in 1630. At that time, mughals have completely invaded half of India. And mughal army was standing at the door of Deccan. 3.Rapid islamisation was being done by invaders,with temples being destroyed,women were abducted,raped & forcefully converted,people were massacred just bcos they refused to accept islam etc. Many horrible things were done. And these things are documented in mughal texts. 4. It was a very horrible time for Indians. No hope left. Infact, it was said at that time, if this continues then within 50 years India would completely become Islamised & lose its culture and identity. 5. Seeing all this, then a 15 year old boy, Shivaji takes a vow in a temple to establish an Indegenious Empire once again, establish a Hindavi Swaraj (self rule of Hindus/Indians) which later came to be known as also known as The Maratha Empire. Shivaji takes blessing from his mother,Jijabai & gave her, his word of defeating these invaders & establishing an Indian Empire once again.He starts his military career at a tender age of 15 year,with no support of any indian kings. He did not have any regular army with trained soldiers, not much wealth to maintain etc. 6. So he builds his army with civilians, like farmers, ironsmiths, tribals etc & not with some trained soldiers. And trains them, gives them hope. Shivaji knew that he cannot face his enemies directly, as they were much stronger than him. So he devised a tactic called - guerilla warfare & since Shivaji army comprised of farmers & tribals, so he uses their geographical & climate knowledge to his full advantage. And he smartly devised his military tactics.He captures first fort called Torna Fort in 1646 at a young age of 16. And later on Shivaji killed General Afzal Khan. And this gave confidence to people under Shivaji that we can turn the tide. And Shivaji also revived the Indian Naval power once again & by 1680, Shivaji had over 380 forts. And with that he established his dominance over the Southern part of India & also re-captured the coastal areas from invaders. 7. This gave confidence to other Indians that we can bounce back,then mughals had face off with the hindus from other frontiers too apart from just deccan. And this gave rise to The Epic 27 Year Long War between Mughals Vs Hindus, which started from 1680(approx.) to 1707. -> Mughal Vs Maratha (1680-1707),which starts with the arrival of Aurangzeb in deccan in 1680. -> Mughal Vs Rajput (1680-1707), which starts under Durgadas Rathore from the western frontier of mughal empire to fight the mughals. -> Mughal Vs Jats (1681-1707), which starts under Rajaram Jat, Ramchehra Jat, & Churaman Jat to fight the mughals which started with the Jat revolt broke out in Agra in 1681. -> And from 1691 onwards, Guru Gobind Singh & Bhim Chand from North also started attacking mughal forces This 27 Year long War was a make or break for hindus.With the collective efforts of hindus,mughals lost their supremacy & with the death of Aurangzeb in 1707, the mughal dominance was practically over. And after that onwards,The Maratha Empire became the dominant force over India replacing mughals and At its peak Maratha Empire stretched from Attock to Peshawar in the North West to Tanjore(Tamil Nadu) in the south & to Cuttack to influence reaching Bengal in east with Nawabs of Bengal handed over Orissa & agree to pay Rs 1.2 million of chauth(annual taxes) from revenue of Bengal & Bihar to Maratha Empire. 9. People don't realise the fact that British did not conquered India from mughals but from The Hindu Maratha Empire, which was established by Chatrapati Shivaji. *My Personal opinion - This is something which i dislike about our ancestors that when The Maratha Empire became the dominant force, they had the golden opportunity to bring back everyone to Sanatana Dharma. But unfortunately they did not made any serious efforts regarding this. And this is a common mistake which our ancestors have been making for past many centuries. And this is a thing with hindus that they accomodate multiple belief system without analysing that belief system of another. Infact among 6-8 major school of Sanatana Dharma (Hinduism) , one of them is based on atheism & they are called Charvaks. Infact Sanatan Dharm is the only culture, which allows atheism to practise. And Many great sages of Hinduism were actually Charvaks. And there are many things like this. PART 5 : Decline of The Maratha Empire infront of British

[@anwer1761]

Salam i got many many answers about the correct and actual history of subcontinent Thanks

[@photographymaniac781]

Why you have neglected Pushayabhuti Empire , Gupta Empire , Shunga Empire Palas , Rastrakutas , chalukyas , marathas , Ahoms , Kharvela Empire , Cholas , Pandayas , Palavas Vijaynagar empire , Sikh Empre etc , All these empires/Kingdom some way to other extended towards north , Your Analysis was based on a specific location but India sub continent was much bigger in size , by Contemplating all , it was not always right to say North always pushed the south by neglecting the mentions

[@goodvibes6715]

Don't Take This Pirzada Seriously Brother Just watch for entertainment like Kapil Sharma Show, or don't watch if you want to preserve your brain cells 😂😂

[@آوارہمانندِہوا]

Because those are all imaginary empires 😂😂😂

[@lol8q]

He just trying to say Brit’s invented Indian civilisation

[@photographymaniac781]

@@goodvibes6715 he literally ate the timeline from 300B.C to 1000A.D , Nearly 1300 years , What a dumb Analysis to come up with 🤣🤣

[@photographymaniac781]

@@آوارہمانندِہوا Nalanda university , Mahabalipuram temples , Jain temples , Sanchi stupas , Kailash temples of Ajanta and Elora , Elephanta caves , Hampi City , Bodh gaya Boudh temples and millions more , Kisne banaya tha bhai "Arbo ne "🤣🤣

[@ishk001]

Very informative vlog Dr.Saab.

[@baazinews1027]

Excellent. 😲 Stay Stuck in your version of the Past. 🙂 What else can a Pakistani Do, where a Foreign Supported Government and has been imposed on the Citizens 😂 What a Pity 🥰 Focus on your country, and don't dig the past. These are artificial methods to raise your morale when there is nothing good going for you or your party. 🤗 Try and live in the real life. 😊

[@آوارہمانندِہوا]

And you stop fighting your past cause you can’t change it😂😂😂

[@siddhayogi907]

Chandergupta was 17 years of age when Alexander came to Taxilla. Ashoka was grandson of Chandergupta.

[@wolf_crusher]

Facts gayab hai iske baat me, Pakistaniyo ko bas wah-wah krna hai, padhna ya check krna kuch nahi hai khud se😂

[@abidjoiya4111]

Brother Allah blessed you always❤

[@beautifulchen5695]

Thanks dr sahib

[@mahagulnaqvi2369]

Why do u not consider haider sir a journalist???it is not good to be arrogant for a TRUE journalist, he has written more than 400 column columns columns in newspapers, aur kya journalist ke singh hote hain

[@CASajjadahmed1225]

Thanks 🙏

[@14051960BHAKLI]

Excellent I salute you for your beautiful presentation of history. In joint India Lahore was main Education centre and Dhaka was main commercial Center.

[@shumailafurnaz6666]

Doc your analysis is very deep and intellectual

[@TGill22]

historically also our(indian) south is different from north. Tamils had a great and wealthiest empire going into Asean countries so Tamil were rich and powerful at that time compare to north India. North India was powerful in different stages. basically when Ashoka turned passive after spreading his kingdom he pacified whole his kingdom(now that is before even Christ was even born) so there was no threat so everyone laid back not from chinese, because of mountains and in the west there was no one to challenge So there was acceptance for every religion, they did not cared about religion they traded with greeks got rich. Also sir i would to differ you said in india people think Muslims attacked Hindus because of religion (i agree with you with this part) but muslims did converted Hindus and Buddhists by force, they set fire on hindu libraries and we can go about that for many hours. Their attack was not motivated by religion but after they got land, money they used religion very brutally. for example i am a sikh and what muslims did to us there is no example anyone doing this for money or land so it was religious. So what happened is muslims force convert everyone but when sikhs females declined to convert into islam their new born babies snatched from their mothers tossed in air and spear shoved in their heart they cut them into pieces hang new born babies parts in their mothers necks as necklace so they fear and convert into islam. Our Guru's sons Bricked alive by Wazir Khan at age of 9 and 5(or 6). you see when pakistanis or anyone say that muslims did nothing wrong in india or invaders were just after money it is wrong. We have suffered and you(not personally) say it was exaggerated. And all people say they treated hindu sikhs nicely but no that is not the truth. they wanted to convert everyone on indian subcontinent into muslims but due to population that was not possible, some converted but large number of people did not. And king have to run a kingdom his kingdom can't be at civil war everyday, so ofcourse they continued their conversion but toned down a bit, that is not treating fairly it was economics at its play. This is the main issue between us muslims think invaders did nothing wrong. Just imagine this you are living peacefuly did not bothered anyone, suddenly there is an attack which is noting out of place at that you get defeated also nothing new invaders come nothing new, but they are converting you into islam forcefully on a sword, capturing your trade routes, before that invaders use to come plunder, take hindu females as slaves and sell them to afghan market. now come 1947 india get partitioned which indians accept and move on. But pakistan remain its views and thinking toward india as invaders had, you name your missiles after invaders you teach bad about india and openly talk about gezwa e hind, terrorists coming in india. You want kashmir which was merged back with india legally. You say majority is muslims and ruler is hindu so that is not legal but in you accept its ruler's (ruler which is muslim and majority is hindu) decision to join pakistan. You see still have that mentality to capture as much as you can with lies on one case you respect muslim ruler's decision on other case you refuse Hindu ruler's decision

[@Oiaworld]

TODAY PATNA (bihar) is modern day patliputra

[@kyadav4640]

Kya keh riye ho...khan?🤯 Marathas were confined to central- west of india.They fought in panipat 500 km away from their northern most stronghold of Gwalior without much local support

[@mylord3003]

Guy peddling lies to prove his point. I stopped viewing halfway

[@khittaykachoudhary2360]

Same even i stopped viewing him.😄 He's just another Zayid Hameeid 😄

[@nadeemsiddique6833]

Great job explaining all this

[@electakhan8334]

Good presentation 👏 👌 my son got to learn a lot from history your presented Dr sb!😊👍

[@abhishekkumartiwari5191]

Tell ur son to type modern indian history , medieval history on youtube he will get so many playlist for history lectures he can watch lectures and learn original history pakistanies shows forged history

[@electakhan8334]

@@abhishekkumartiwari5191 thank you 😊 🙏

[@fafaizi]

Excellent historical vlog. Thanks Peerzada sahib. Aap nai samandar kozai mai band kerr diya

[@dehlra]

Hello! Sir, you are doing a lot for this poor nation. I wish to be a part of your struggle. Carl Marx has done this before. No doubt that south has done alot in education but at the same time north was prepared for producing soldiers in the same way as now iin Pakistan. Salt belt is fixed for better soldier, their culture their stories their loves are all for soldiers. // if we insist repeatedly that like other world our leaders must be honest like angel. And repeat this statement frequently we may be able to achieve this, that people should not vote to dishonest. Your statement will be a great help in the regard that "discuss this everywhere "that don't vote to Dishonest. That's all for this thanks

[@csghumman]

Very interesting observation. There is another thing that requires analysis. Why north western India adapted to the new western civilization markedly different than the Southern India adapted?

[@AlreadyInUse]

If this is the level of Intellectuals in Pakistan, i can understand where the Country is headed to.

[@khittaykachoudhary2360]

He is a Chhaapdhi like Zaiyd Hameeid. 😄 Don't take Him Seriously 😄 Even in Pakistan Nobody Takes Whim Seriously, Which is Why He is Hiding in America. 😄

[@sameerahmed1853]

Your understanding of an intellectual just be arnab goswami shouting "mujhe drug do" on live television

[@baazinews1027]

@@sameerahmed1853 India's Forex Reserves - $600 Billion Bangladesh Forex Reserves - $30 Billion Nepal Forex Reserves - $10 Billion Afghansitan Forex Reserves - $9 Billion Pakistan Forex Reserves - $3.5 Billion Well Done Iqbaal Ke Shaheen 🦍

[@jameshardley9793]

The level of response by a non Intellectual reflect with what you said .....Remain in USE and never learn. Lolz

[@ishk001]

I think he did not fabricate anything and he is actually a very learned and a very well read person.

[@sarmadnaqvi-sm3wj]

Just Brilliant. May Allah bless your Dr.Sahib

[@yalmazalpha1]

Court-Martial for Bajwa & Co. No Elections? Then Taxation.

[@آوارہمانندِہوا]

People please don’t disturb Indians in comments ( )they busy fighting their past.

[@rayraja7411]

When in 1947 Pakistan became a country at that time 80+ %bureaucracy of pakistan were consist of those Pakistani who came from India because those migrants were very educated . Pakistan area was like a wild wild west of united India.

[@KhawjaAziz]

Brilliant and concise analysis. Thank you for your effort and share.

[@lol8q]

Imran khan body language during his visit to White House was confident….he talked with eye in eye …..this is pirazadas analysis..someone shud teach him journalism….😂