Is Darwinian Evolution as factual as people claim?

[@OnePathNetwork]

Watch the full episode on the OnePath Network app: onepathnetwork.app.link/gYzZLhCWreb

[@ishaqalexander1305]

Please upload full episode here. This is not something to upload in ott /own platform.Please🙏 Jazakallahu khairan.

[@Shammer1]

I was just wonder why one path network started using music

[@atiqueahmed6344]

Have you used music in this video?

[@contagionmoviepredictscoro827]

OnePath Network Too Many 0f 0ur brothers & Sisters Are Learning About Islam From the book Fazail-e-Amaal, As You know This Book Has So Many Teachings In It Which Are Contradicting The Quran & Hadith ...Please Make A Video Telling Muslims To Turn To Quran & Hadith instead 0f Fazail-e-Amaal

[@atiqueahmed6344]

@@contagionmoviepredictscoro827 First of all many people including me came to practicing Islam because of Fazail e Aamal. There nothing contradictory in it. It contains Fazail (Benefits/Advantages) of aamaal and according to human nature it attracts to the benefits and that's what our Prophet pbuh had done and his teachings are there in Fazail e Aamaal along with our Aslaf (Spiritual Ancestors) as we are told to ask and follow them in Surah Fatiha last 2nd verse. Hope you might have read it before saying anything about it and have attended those gatherings where it is been preached. May Allah guide us to the right path.

[@thisisme9130]

Actually i like all colours

[@nordanibinadrijuhann5397]

Alhamdulillah, thank you for uploading this video. I was having serious doubts about this.

[@muhammadshahedkhanshawon3785]

I recommend you a channel it will clear all your doubts- Subbor Ahmad Darwinian Delusions

[@chiharo8468]

I also recommend Dr. Eyad Qunaybi's episodes in which he debunks Darwinism. He approaches the issue from both scholarly and Islamic point of view. kzbin.info/www/bejne/pqfTmXVpn7hkqrM

[@trikusniati8622]

@@chiharo8468 thankyou for the link

[@Bill_Garthright]

I recommend that you get your information about biology from biologists, rather than from religious apologists with a predetermined conclusion.

[@danh4435]

Dw.... Evolution is a theory.. We do evolve as humans but from humans and animals from its own kind of animals 😀. Evolution the so called " theory" needs to be around centuries in order to test it and guess what? Humans don't live that long to test it, reason why it's called a theory. They just want to believe in something other than God that's ALLL... We muslims Alhamdulilah believe everything has been created by Allah not only that, we worship the right God. 😆.

[@saims.2402]

At this point they’re just finding a excuses to believe in evolution. Isn’t the scientific method they talk about to always try to prove your hypothesis wrong.

[@palani9376]

yes thats why darwin himself has parts in his books where he talks about problems he found with his theory but people want any excuse not to believe in uno who im in the toilet so dont wanna say his name just to make themsleves not feel guilty for the stuff they do on earth

[@Aiden_Muslim]

I knew I would find you here

[@palani9376]

@Christopher Sagan aint noone watching a 2 hour doc on evolution

[@fluffytoast8713]

@@Aiden_Muslim trueeee he's always in the comments lmao

[@pedroamaralcouto]

I recommend you to watch the video again. It's not about biological evolution, it's about darwinian evolution (ie: evolution through natural selection).

[@ashrofu]

I love the content however I don't feel it is sufficiently elaborated. Can you upload more about this?

[@RiskyWiskyHD]

Subbor Ahmed Darwinian Delusions - this is brother subbor channel (the guys who is speaking about evolution).

[@chiharo8468]

I recommend Dr. Eyad Qunaybi's episodes in which he debunks Darwinism. He approaches the issue from both scholarly and Islamic point of view. kzbin.info/www/bejne/pqfTmXVpn7hkqrM

[@OnePathNetwork]

Watch the full episode on the OnePath Network app: onepathnetwork.app.link/gYzZLhCWreb

[@ashrofu]

@@OnePathNetwork thank you so much

[@ishaqalexander1305]

@@OnePathNetwork please upload full episode in youtube too... Everybody can't/simply dont want to download one path app like me.

[@maodijong3661]

Exceptional video...I've seen so much of Subboor but rarely are the names he quotes brought up on screen and it is often difficult to understand the pronunciation. This however is excellent, thank you brother.

[@captaindesperatehousewife2441]

Considering we're talking about Evolution, I would love to share my views on Darwin's explanation of Evolution (I would be pleased if you read this): 1) Of course, we all logically mutate and evolve, but I disagree that having mutations = unlocking new functions and becoming a whole new specie because people who have many mutations tend to always die because their body cannot handle that great amount of mutations, and an example would be cancer, it all starts when the DNA mutates or change via an error, correct? I doubt organisms overtime were able to survive and become a whole new specie without being killed throughout the process by cancer or a harmful mutation. 2) I believe that we lack the experiements on relativity as well. For example, we proved that as a fact, DNA is passed down from the parents to the offspring and it counts for relativity by using humans, apes, snakes, and literally all the other living things with their own specie, however, because our DNA looks familiar to our "Ancestors", we concluded that we came from them. However, I'd disagree with that. You see, relativity was proven to be working when it was tested on humans-to-humans or "Ancestors"-to-"Ancestors" experiements, but have we ever made any experiements on the first human and our last so-called believed "Ancestor" that we are told humanity came from? As far as I know, not really, why? Not only because we have never found the fossil to confirm, but when you look at the RBC (Red Blood Cells), there are 4 types of them, correct? Now, think of it this way, a person with blood type (A) donated his blood to another person with blood type (A). It works, right? Another person with blood type (B) donated his blood to another person with blood type (B). It works again, right? But now a new a person with blood type A came to donate his blood to a person with blood type O, but it failed and got the acceptor killed because of it. In other words: -RBC (A) can work with RBC (A). -RBC (B) can work with RBC (B). -RBC (A) CAN'T work with RBC (O). In the same way: -Relativity works when tested on humans-to-humans -Relativity works when tested on "Ancestors"-to-"Ancestors" -But does relativity really work when tested on humans-to-ancestors? I mean, have we really ever made a relativity experiement where we used our ancestors as the "Parent" and a human as the "Offspring" to make sure that we are all really connected? 3) The Endosymbiosis Theory: The entire theory revolves around the idea that the Prokaryotic Cells became Eukaryotic Cells as the Bacteria started eating Mitochondria and the other organelles not found within Prokaryotic Cells. However, while Bacteria do 100% consume and use whatever they eat, no experiements were done to show how does a Bacteria react to a floating Mitochondria and how will it use it. On top of that, that makes me question why on Earth was there a Mitochondria back then floating around by itself...? The entire purpose of that organelle is to create ATP, or energy for the cells, but according to this so-called "Theory", it was without cell and was floating alone, but wouldn't that be weird when you think about it? Wouldn't natural selection favor Bacterias with Mitochondria? Shouldn't there be common amount of Bacterias with Mitochondria out there? 4) As a fact, all living things with DNA mutate, but I think Scientists fail to consider that mutations are random and have many types when they talk about Evolution. For example, according to Evolution, mutations are basically changes within the DNA that changes the organism, giviving it new functions and change it as a whole while treating mutations as something beneficial. While mutations can be beneficial, there are many that are harmful, silent, affective, small, big, and so on. There are many types of Mutations that needs to be looked at. Now I know by natural selection, harmful and silent mutations are mostly likely guessed to be at an disadvantange (So they die out), but we certainly have no clue how the environment back then used to be. For example, think of X-Men. They are humans with mutations that gave them super-powers who fight for their rights to live while people are afraid of them and their powers. If you read the title only, you would guess that natural selection would favor the X-Men over humans and the X-Men will win. That's the same way how we look at species who have a beneficial mutation vs their normal form when we speak and study of Natural Selection. However, when you watch the movie, X-Men at the end lose against humanity. What I'm trying to say here is that having a beneficial mutation doesn't necessarily = "You'll live, reproduce, and have a happy life with no harm". It all depends on how lucky life treats you. So when we, for example, assume that a fish and its offspring managed to mutate and reproduced more and more and kept on passing their genes forever until we became humans without being stopped or striked down by an unlucky day that draws an end to them seems really off and something you'd find within a Fairy Tale story. It's not impossible, but there are infinite outcomes to what could have happened to any organism every second, which like I've said, most Scientists fail to consider when talking about Natural Selection... One final note to my first reason: I believe that there's a limit to mutations. For example, SARS mutated to COVID-19, right? However, despite the mutation, they still have the same function. They are just more stronger. I think there's a limit to SARS, like a final form. Maybe that's why having many mutations can kill a human because they passed their limit?

[@abdulroqibbello6591]

This is awesome. The first point sank in immediately, I love what you did with the X-men thingy. Was really relatable But I don't really get the blood transfusion part of A dying from O's blood. Kindly expatiate. But this is a must read, no doubt. Thanks a lot

[@captaindesperatehousewife2441]

@@abdulroqibbello6591 Oh, thank you❤ Basically, the *A* type of Red Blood Cells are surrounded by "Anti-Gens" that are special to *A* only. At the same time, your body contains *Anti-B* type of proteins that are called "Anti-Bodies" that defends you and fight against anything that enters your blood and have a *B* type of Anti-Gen, hence that's why the *Anti-B* won't attack your Red Blood Cells because it contains the *A* type of Anti-Gens. The *O* type of Red Blood Cells are surrounded by zero Anti-Gens and their blood contains *Anti-B* and *Anti-A* Anti-Bodies that attack anything that have the Anti-Gens of *A* or *B* and only allow Red Blood Cells that have zero (O) Anti-Gens to pass. When a person with a *O* type of RBC (Red Blood Cells) donate to a person with *A* type of RBC, the *Anti-B* Anti-bodies won't attack it because the *O* type doesn't carry the *B* Anti-Gen, so it gets a pass. When a person with *A* type of RBC donates to a person with *O* type of RBC, the body of the person with *O* type of RBC will attack the new *A* type of RBC because *Anti-A* hate *A* Anti-Gens, so his body will start fighting the *A* type of RBC, causing great sickness to you for a long time that can kill you. In other words: - *Anti-A* hates *A* Anti-Gens - *Anti-B* hates *B* Anti-Gens

[@captaindesperatehousewife2441]

@@abdulroqibbello6591 So what I'm trying to state is that maybe relativity of the DNA when experiemented works differently when we experiement it on the first human and the last Homo Erectus (The Homo Erectus as the "Parent" and the human as the "Offspring") that they believe we came from to prove that we are truly related. I'm trying to point out how they assume that we are suddenly related all because: - We made DNA experiements on, let us say, a cat that's the mother and the cat's kittens or babies and then found out that they are related (Consider the cats as Homo Erectus, for example) - We made DNA experiements on a father human and his kids and then found out that they're related. And then all of the sudden, we assume that humans came from cats, despite of the fact that there's zero experiements on that. And the RBC explanation proves that assuming things is dangerous and wrong.

[@captaindesperatehousewife2441]

@ISLAMIC 5thCALIPHATE You could be correct that the fact that we are made mostly made up of the same elements could be the reason behind that, thought I believe that when Allah stated that the humans were made up of the Earth (Water and Clay), I'm sure it (Allah) was refering to the human body as a whole, not the DNA, but the only problem with this statement is that the thing that makes our DNA different from one another would be the way codons are placed, not based on what elements we are made of. A better explanation would be that God created us normally and that the reason we share DNA that's alike would be answered by the fact that we share similar functions and proteins that our RNA makes from our DNA, so that's why our DNA looks alike. However, even my explanation faces a problem, and that's the fact that whales have similar functions to fishes, yet whales are mammals and have alot of difference when it comes to a whale's DNA and a fish's DNA, so there's some problems with this explanation too that I can't answer yet.

[@abdulroqibbello6591]

@@captaindesperatehousewife2441 exactly, this is what confused me. Cos you said O (donor) transfused blood to A (acceptor) then the acceptor had problems, whereas O is a universal donor. So I was confused of how A should have an issue. Probably a mistake though. But I'm clear now. Thanks a lot

[@nmanra1452]

I feel like there should be more videos about how we muslims should respond to people who say we come from apes. This videos didn't go though everything I hoped it would and it was too short. I would love it it you did a more in depth video about darwinism, because unfortunately they teach this to the new generation in schools and tell the younger muslims that it's facts. So many muslims in secular countries are taught to believe darwinism. So therefore I would appreciate it if you did more videos on this topic. But this was a good start 👍

[@chiharo8468]

I totally agree. Dr. Eyad Qunaybi addresses thèse issues in his Channel but in Arabic. His arguments are thoroughly elaborated. He is translating his Arabic videos in his New channel in which he debunks Darwinism. He approaches the issue from both scholarly and Islamic point of view. kzbin.info/www/bejne/pqfTmXVpn7hkqrM

[@alhomsiyyah]

Suboor, the guy in the video, has a channel dedicated to deep-diving into evolutionary theory and Darwinism if you want to see more of him.

[@Bill_Garthright]

No one is taught to believe "darwinism." They're just taught science. They're just taught biology. And evolution is the _foundation_ of modern biology. You can believe in magic if you want, but magic isn't science, so it's not taught in science classes in civilized countries. You might want to get your knowledge of biology from biologists, rather than from religious apologists with an axe to grind.

[@nmanra1452]

@@Bill_Garthright The interesting thing about science though is that it's always changing. But let me tell you something, at the end of the day, I'd rather believe in God and follow my religion (which helps me become a better person and brings me peace) than to be an atheist and die with no belief in an afterlife. I'd rather die as a believer and be wrong than die as a non-believer and risk being damned to hell, because by then it would be too late. Salam alaikum (that means peace be unto you btw)✌️

[@Bill_Garthright]

@@nmanra1452 _The interesting thing about science though is that it's always changing._ Yes. Every day, scientists are learning more and more. But that's a _good_ thing, isn't it? Or do you think that staying ignorant is good? Science is accumulating more and more knowledge every single day. So, yes, it's "always changing." (If you mean something else there, I highly recommend Isaac Asimov's brief essay on "The Relativity of Wrong." It's very short and freely available online. Just do a quick search.) _I'd rather die as a believer and be wrong than die as a non-believer and risk being damned to hell_ Sorry, but you're as likely to be "damned to hell" as I am (assuming that a hell actually _exists,_ which seems like a silly thing to believe, to me). The thing is, you don't just have to believe in a god, you have to choose the _right_ god. And then, you have to do what that particular god wants you to do (basically, you must decide which human being to believe about that). But theists are all _over_ the place when it comes to which god is real, whether or not a hell exists in the first place, and, if there _is_ a hell, what you have to do or believe in order to escape it. I suppose you just believe in the god - and the hell - that you were taught to believe as a baby? Certainly, that's the clear worldwide pattern of religious belief. Worldwide, faith-based people _overwhelmingly_ believe in whatever religion and whatever god or gods they were taught to believe as children. That's just a fact. Yes, converts exist - in _every_ direction (even though Muslims who leave Islam risk being _murdered;_ apparently, you guys aren't so confident that they'll be punished in hell after all, huh? ) - but they're a tiny minority. Typically, you theists just believe whatever you were taught to believe as a child. There's a reason why 83% of Italians are Christian, while 90% of Egyptians are Muslim and 80% of Indians are Hindu. So it's really hard for me to take your claims seriously, especially since _none_ of you seem to have even *one* piece of good evidence backing up your diverse, contradictory claims. _Salam alaikum (that means peace be unto you btw)_ Right. You claim I'm going to be tortured in hell for eternity, but then you wish me "peace." Heh, heh. You know, as an atheist, I'd be murdered in any majority Muslim country. So I tend to think that you guys don't actually _mean_ that when you make your ritual claim at the end of an email. Maybe you're different, I don't know. But Islam makes a big deal about being "the religion of peace" while also being the most violent religion on Earth, currently. In 13 majority Muslim countries, 'apostasy' and/or 'blasphemy' are _officially_ punishable by death (not to mention all of the fanatic religious nuts who will eagerly kill nonbelievers for free). It's almost as if you guys don't actually _believe_ that your god is going to punish people in hell. I mean, doesn't your god have a plan for that? Or maybe he's just so puny or so inept - or so absent-minded? - that you have to kill people _for_ him? Either way, when you're not even confident enough in your own beliefs to permit freedom of speech and freedom of religion, that's pretty telling, isn't it? After all, if you're _right,_ then you shouldn't _need_ the threat of murder to keep Muslims from hearing alternative views and making up their own mind. (And, in reality, you _don't_ need that. Typically, most people are going to believe whatever stories they were taught to believe as a child _anyway._ You don't _need_ murder to keep your flock - and the status and political power that gives to your religious leaders. But religious leaders often seem to be terrified that they might lose their advantages, huh? And if the threat of hell isn't absolutely certain to keep people in line, then maybe actual _murder_ will be?) Yeah, "peace." Sorry, but I'm skeptical.

[@zdelivery7573]

they always always say "objectively", "scientifically" meanwhile at the same time they also put their 'belief' hence faith, in darwinism. pure stupid

[@DaNyAaLcEc]

I had no idea that there were serious academic discussions on blue is for boys and pink is for girls. I always just assumed it was a social construct. Thank heavens academia is here to help us with these things

[@jamesginty6684]

have you check out "Exposing the Discovery Institute Part 1: Casey Luskin" and "How Creationism Taught Me Real Science 44 Lucy" on youtube. they shows how ignorant .Casey Luskin and discovery institute is.

[@zartosht06]

People do not treat Darwin like God; it is a common strategy to discredit your opposition by accusing them of doing the thing you are doing: blindly following. What Darwin presented was not perfect by any means but decades of scientific research developed it into awe-inspiring theory. Stop obfuscation and offer intelligent dispute.

[@mohammadtarek3842]

The three limitations of Darwin's theory concern the origin of DNA, the irreducible complexity of the cell, and the paucity of transitional species.

[@Harris19941]

aren't the random mutations also a problem? like do we have evidence of random mutations resulting in new information/characteristics which werent pre existing?

[@TmanRock9]

The theory of evolution doesn’t deal with the origin of dna. The cell isn’t irreducible complex nor does someone have to reduce the cell since evolution begins with the first cell not with how the cell formed. The fossil record will always be scarce however the record shows clear transition throughout. The are over 300 fossils of just one species in the genus Australopithecus as well as dozens of fossils of other species in the genus showing a clear build to homo Habilis, then to homo Erectus then to Homo sapiens and their cousins. None of these are limitations to the theory.

[@TmanRock9]

@@Harris19941yes we do for example the peppered moth mutations which changed the moths pigmentation was the result of an insertion mutation from a non protein coding region of the genome. This caused the moths to be darker in appearance and therefor better camouflaged

[@Harris19941]

@@TmanRock9 i m aware of the moth example gotta read it again but as far as i know there is no nee genetic information and function here only a variety in existing information if thats the case then the moth example will fail as well

[@Harris19941]

@@TmanRock9 fossil record is problematic for the theory as is acknowledged and therefore onr needed to invent other stuff like punctuated equilibrium the fossil record doesn't support the theory clinging on a few specular transitions is not enough fact is that multiple explosions like the Cambrian explosion are a big problem for the theory and according to darwin it should refute the theory but when one persistently wants to hold on to it then nothing can disprove it furthermore irreducible complexity is a problem in the sense that gradual random changes are not possible if they all need to happen at once and coordinated.

[@Mando-wx6pn]

You should actually learn about evolution if you're going to try to debunk it.

[@ramigilneas9274]

Short answer: Yes.

[@abdulweliahmed8832]

Ma Sha Allah, Jazakumu Allahu kheyraa, May Allah grant us deep understanding of the Deen and guide us to the right path

[@jamesginty6684]

have you check out "Exposing the Discovery Institute Part 1: Casey Luskin" and "How Creationism Taught Me Real Science 44 Lucy" on youtube. they shows how ignorant .Casey Luskin and discovery institute is.

[@mohammadtarek3842]

The three limitations of Darwin's theory concern the origin of DNA, the irreducible complexity of the cell, and the paucity of transitional species.

[@whisperingforest9909]

Yes....yes it is

[@goldenemitte2245]

Could you please do an QA with Subboor

[@moi2961]

When I saw the word evolution In thumbnail ,I realised saboor will be there. Mashallah

[@Shashwat_Lakhera]

😂😂 there is no fact in this video disapproving Neo Darwinism.

[@ibrahimmir1399]

I'll be honest here, I see no reason for Muslims to reject evolution as a whole. It's entirely possible Allah (SWT) set up the mechanisms for evolution and allowed life to develop that way. The only thing we Muslims must argue against is humans being a part of that process. The Quran is clear that Hazrat Aadam and his wife Huwa were made from Allah's own hand and were not the descendants of primates. (One of) the reasons why evolutionists are so staunch in their belief that humans are a product of evolution is because...well...what other assumption will they make? Take God out of the equation, and you would never assume that a life form could spontaneously appear out of nothingness. The only logical answer is that humans are a process of evolution. However, as Muslims, we have been given the divine revelation and epistemologically speaking, the revealed truth is above all other truths and so we must argue against the narrative that humans are descendants of another species. That being said, humans have experienced micro evolution (we've observed it).

[@mbb1849]

Underrated comment!! This is what I believe. It makes that Allah could have set up certain mechanisms by which the world functions, essentially.

[@posintabook597]

You are trying to reframe what Quran explicitly says

[@Avistyl]

@@posintabook597and what does it say?

[@krsaditofficial]

Hmm I guess this still won't work. Very poor arguments. I guess the best evolution related discussion was done by Yasir Qadhi. Only he comes close by challenging with academic methodology.

[@samkb6374]

Do you have a link to this video?

[@dondadda1]

What non-Muslim people don’t know, is that Muslims do their homework very precisely/thoroughly, and are very educated on the subject of existence. Way to go brothers, May Allah bless you all and give you more knowledge to share with the world, Ameen

[@samgrainger1554]

It's perfectly possible to learn/know alot about something and still be wrong

[@Edward-bm7vw]

No you're not.

[@muhammadtarique242]

That's so silly for us to believe everything blindfoldedly. Darwin theory is understandable from the prism that we humans have similar genetic properties alike monkey. And that's okay to believe for the point that it's the best way put for our evolution as humans not the exact truth like once we believe 1/1=1 but 0/0!=0 as there will always be exceptional and alternatives truth and claims.

[@shams395]

We came from Adam and Eve who were not any animal of any kind. And we humans are all children of Adam.

[@samgrainger1554]

Our cell type is animal, our genomes are animal, our embryonic development is that of animals, our neural architecture is animal and... we evolved from animals. I think it is time to accept that we are not more distinct from animals than we like to believe we are. What skin colour did Adam and Eve have?

[@intranext1359]

@@samgrainger1554 our cell is made of atoms and rocks are made of atoms. BOOM we are descandants of rocks

[@samgrainger1554]

@@intranext1359 boi, that's one heck of a non sequitur

[@intranext1359]

@@samgrainger1554 Isn't that the person above said. Btw i was just exaturating the person aboves statement. I was just showing the absurdity of Darwinian evolution.

[@samgrainger1554]

@@intranext1359 abiogenesis, the beginning of life is a fascinating topic. Don't dismiss it because it isn't fully sussed out yet. It's a difficult area of investigation. Evolution there after, I mean it's just the emergant result of fundimetals of physics. I don't see why it's so hard to get behind

[@SL-lu1wv]

بارك الله فيكم

[@MeralynBartonico]

2 minutes of this 4 minute video is about some study in evolutionary psychology, it doesnt talk about darwinian natural selection in biology. and for his counter arguments against darwinian natural selection, he sums up a few individuals who have different ideas. so ? its about the merit of the ideas, not about how many people have an alternative idea. who the fuk takes neo lamarckiasm seriously ? new mutation ? how many new predictions did new mutation theory generate ? nada

[@ObiJohnKenobi67]

How did this disprove Evolution? All it showed was that we are learning more about it, not that it is somehow disputed.

[@mubassharshahid5189]

It's often portrayed as a fact or law by many atheist social media personalities. Seeing alternatives to darwinism shows they are still figuring things out. No one knows what the future holds, they may discover something that does not fit at all with the current model. Keep an open mind!

[@ObiJohnKenobi67]

@@mubassharshahid5189 Darwinism is not the same as evolution. The theory of evolution is the most accurate explanation of the diversification of organisms we have, much more so than the alternative (Creationism).

[@mubassharshahid5189]

@northseapirate2313 It is the most accurate with the current evidence. However, evolution relies on alot of deduction. Not all areas are accounted for. It is still the best way to describe how things evolve. But again it ain't 100 percent as say gravity. Hope you get what I'm trying to say.

[@ObiJohnKenobi67]

@@mubassharshahid5189 Science is never 100%, because we are always learning more.

[@saims.2402]

Natural selection is a mechanism that Allah created to maintain balance in the animal kingdom.

[@samgrainger1554]

And your evidence? You know it would happen regardless of if anyone wanted it to happen right

[@samkb6374]

@@samgrainger1554 Not if God also created the whole universe.

[@samgrainger1554]

@@samkb6374 ...and your evidence? Compadre, there are many "if"s but we should determine which of them is correct.

[@samkb6374]

@@samgrainger1554 This universe didn’t pop out of nothing and the multi verse story still doesn’t give answer on what created everything. Atheïsts try to (ab)use Darwins concept to present an argument against God but they didn’t figure out what created everything.

[@samgrainger1554]

@@samkb6374 I certainly ain't gonna make assertions about how the univervese began or even if it had a begining (no begining actually requires fewer assumptions since we "know" that there is presently a universe). I'd caution agaist broad sweeping statments about what athiests belive as they'll certainly have a mix of views and not all of them will argue that evolution disproves god. I agree that "a creator being/will not existing" is not a statment that follows from evolution by natural selection being true. ...however it does disprove the argument from desgin. Evolution proves that we can have what looks like desgin and it better explains the kinds of degins we do and don't observe, explains the kinds of imperfections and it better explains the observations of desgins over time. It doesn't disprove God but it does make God as an explination for the world less nessasary.

[@hexa1905]

Why don't you also attack cosmology ? I meant it contradict your holybook just as much. The earth wasn't spread as a bed and stars aren't lamps fixed on the firmament to be thrown at devils.

[@BadbīpaBāsi]

need 100hrs of video on this, because now a days BD has also included this in the curriculum.

[@abbasalie8563]

I love Black color.

[@rparwez6206]

JazakAllahu khair...

[@CanalPSG]

Quote-mine alert. The quoted biologists generally accept the theory of evolution, but have criticisms on some minor points.Tthat doesn't mean they support intelligent design or the ‘God did it.”-theory.

[@curiosone8843]

You are right and the other point is that the theory of Evolution isnt even the opponent of the Designer Argument.

[@muhammadshahedkhanshawon3785]

Love you Subbor Ahmad ❤️

[@samgrainger1554]

Disproving one application of the ideas of Darwinian evolution does not invalidate Darwinian evolution. It shows that it cannot be applied to explain that example. that is all. To disprove Darwinian evolution you'd have to take it down at its roots. We have not been successful at doing that and it is highly unlikely we ever will.

[@jakewebdev6428]

The Darwinian evolution has itself evolved from the theory where acquired characteristics can be transmitted trough gemmules in a process called Pangenesis. Darwin stated in the first edition of "The Origin of Species": "In North America the black bear was seen . . . swimming for hours with widely open mouth, thus catching, like a whale, insects in the water. Even in so extreme a case as this, if the supply of insects were constant, and if better adapted competitors did not already exist in the country, I can see no difficulty in a race of bears being rendered, by natural selection, more and more aquatic in their structure and habits, with larger and larger mouths, till a creature was produced as monstrous as a whale." While Mendel made came to deduction that acquired characteristics (muscular mass, san-tan...) cannot be inherited like the length of Helianthus tuberosus that varies according to altitude. From it's roots we have no idea about how life began. While it was a common conception at that time that life can emerge from non-life "worms formation from rotten meat" and that came from the founder of biology "Snakes do not reproduce, worms grow and turn into snakes." Aristotle, "Book IV". The History of Animals. Translated by D'Arcy Wentworth Thompson. Oxford: Clarendon Press A process latter on disproven by Louis Pasteur. Vestigial organs that were a valid argument supporting evolution In 1893, a German anatomist named Robert Wiedersheim drew up a list of 86 human “vestiges”, organs “formerly of greater physiological significance than at present”. Over the years, the list grew, then shrank to 0 until recently we taught that the appendix was a vestigial organ until Researchers deduced that the appendix is designed to protect good bacteria in the gut. That way, when the gut is affected by a bout of diarrhea or other illness that cleans out the intestines, the good bacteria in the appendix can repopulate the digestive system and keep you healthy. When finally chemistry and emerged we discovered that humans and monkeys could not be related humans have 46 while other primates have 48 chromosomes, even thought to overcome this other theories and models have been issued where a fusion occurred in the 2q13-2q14.1 this supposition was made a decade before we finished studying the human genome in 2003 where we discovered that if that fusion happened that cell would have cancer.

[@samgrainger1554]

@@jakewebdev6428 I was trying to keep it simple. I got the sense that many watching this vid wouldn't be familiar enough with the general theory of evolution to be able to use the detailed history of the theory to date.

[@samgrainger1554]

"From its roots" I was not talking about the origin of life. I was taking about the algorithmic logic of evolotion and how it works whenever you have the scenarios that it predicts it would work in.

[@jakewebdev6428]

@@samgrainger1554 I have a great respect with non-dogmatic atheists like Noam Chomsky, Michel Foucault and I find many atheists to be respectful. Just earlier last month I had an argument with a Hitchens fan who kept on saying "You believe in fairy tales, Grow up, Hahaha!", later when he took evolution as a main argument first of all I asked him what is evolution? He replied by a common false misconception. That person did not even know what a mitochondria is . He was mocking me in such an arrogant way all the time while he did not even know high school cellular biology. Later on we went in the miracles area and asked him about how much is 2+2 he answered that it is four, he clearly showed his ignorance of the uncertainty principle in the quantum mechanics where 2+2=5 is a possibility. Those people are using the same ideologic weapon that dogmatic Darwinists use "superficial reasoning", one of the best selling book denying the existence of God had as a primary argument the "The vestigial pelvis" in the whale, later on and recently we discovered that those bones have a vital role in reproduction. I studied it when in SAT preparations and all recent printings of that academic book it has been removed. And by the way this misinformation is still circulating everywhere.

[@samgrainger1554]

@@jakewebdev6428 let me also apologize now for big dyslexia.

[@lacag-lacag]

its darwin theory not a darwin fact

[@Bill_Garthright]

No. Actually, it has little to do with Darwin these days, but evolution is both a fact _and_ a theory. (Note that, in science, "theory" is much higher than "fact." Theories are explanations, backed by an abundance of good evidence, that _explain_ facts. It doesn't get any better than "theory" in science.)

[@samgrainger1554]

Yesterday is a "mere" theory not a fact

[@samkb6374]

@@Bill_Garthright We still don’t call it the law of random natural selection.

[@Bill_Garthright]

@@samkb6374 _We still don’t call it the law of random natural selection._ True. We _don't_ call it that. But... so what? What's your point?

[@proteensheikh8601]

Nice video :)

[@Hudanasheeds]

suboor spitting facts

[@kamranbasheer4659]

I believe in ultimate authority of Quran above all... But our present religious creation story is not in harmony with Quran وَاِذۡ قَالَ رَبُّكَ لِلۡمَلٰٓـئِكَةِ اِنِّىۡ جَاعِلٌ فِى الۡاَرۡضِ خَلِيۡفَةً ؕ قَالُوۡٓا اَتَجۡعَلُ فِيۡهَا مَنۡ يُّفۡسِدُ فِيۡهَا وَيَسۡفِكُ الدِّمَآءَۚ وَنَحۡنُ نُسَبِّحُ بِحَمۡدِكَ وَنُقَدِّسُ لَـكَ​ؕ قَالَ اِنِّىۡٓ اَعۡلَمُ مَا لَا تَعۡلَمُوۡنَ‏ (2:30) This verse says khalifa which may mean a successor and not the beginning... ﷽ 2:36 فَاَزَلَّهُمَاالشَّيۡطٰنُعَنۡهَافَاَخۡرَجَهُمَامِمَّاكَانَافِيۡهِ​وَقُلۡنَااهۡبِطُوۡابَعۡضُكُمۡلِبَعۡضٍعَدُوٌّ ۚوَلَـكُمۡفِىالۡاَرۡضِمُسۡتَقَرٌّوَّمَتَاعٌاِلٰىحِيۡنٍ‏٣٦ Then Ash-Shaytan (The all-vicious, i.e., the devil) caused them to slide back therefrom, so he drove them out of what they (both) were in; and We said, "Get down, each of you is an enemy of the other; (Literally: some of you an enemy of some) and in the earth you (The pronoun is plural, not dual, i.e., more than two) will have a repository and an enjoyment for a while The above mentioned verse says that Adam and Eve were exiled from jannah and left on earth But God already says that He was making a successor for earth So it will be better to interpret jannah as a simple earthly garden here which was destroyed when Adam and Eve sinned and not actual heaven which humans will be granted after death... اَوَلَمۡيَرَالَّذِيۡنَكَفَرُوۡۤااَنَّالسَّمٰوٰتِوَالۡاَرۡضَكَانَـتَارَتۡقًافَفَتَقۡنٰهُمَا​ ؕوَجَعَلۡنَامِنَالۡمَآءِكُلَّشَىۡءٍحَىٍّ​ ؕاَفَلَايُؤۡمِنُوۡنَ‏٣٠ Did the disbelievers not observe that the heavens and the earth were closed, then We opened them? And We created from water every living thing. Would they still not believe? In this verse Allah clearly mentioned creation of every living thing was made from water... We too Allah also mentions that humans were created for mud ,dust etc This simple means that Allah created us from earth , or from very humble building blocks... Allah says I perfected man and proportionated him We often fail to understand that it might have been a longer time... Much like evolutionary biologist say... Allah says that he created earth in six days رَبَّكُمُ اللّهُ الَّذِي خَلَقَ السَّمَاوَاتِ وَالأَرْضَ فِي سِتَّةِ أَيَّامٍ ثُمَّ اسْتَوَى عَلَى الْعَرْشِ يُغْشِي اللَّيْلَ النَّهَارَ يَطْلُبُهُ حَثِيثًا وَالشَّمْسَ وَالْقَمَرَ وَالنُّجُومَ مُسَخَّرَاتٍ بِأَمْرِهِ أَلاَ لَهُ الْخَلْقُ وَالأَمْرُ تَبَارَكَ اللّهُ رَبُّ الْعَالَمِينَ Surely your Lord is Allah, Who created the heavens and the earth in six periods of time, and He is firm in power; He throws the veil of night over the day, which it pursues incessantly; and (He created) the sun and the moon and the stars, made subservient by His command; surely His is the creation and the command; blessed is Allah, the Lord of the worlds. Why can't we understand that these are the eras of earth's geology... Quran is not a science book but is is in harmony with science I don't say that darvanian evolution is 100 percent truth but denying evolution totally is a hypocrisy when a person witnesses animals and plants divided into distinct groups... Identical genetic make up of species and so on... I believe that Adam was first prophet who was taught sciences of agriculture and community and was provided with law and Eve was not made from his rib but she was from same species... And when they married their children made first human settlements and from those we came into being... As Allah mentions that from Adam and Eve he made us into nations ... Science , fossil records and research are not enemies of Quran but thinking that what we know is the ultimate truth except the oneness of God is indeed an enemy to Us... When our ancestors questioned Quran and searched for answers they brought golden ages ... Then our behaviour changed we stopped questioning and bought colonialism to our kingdoms , we forgot that there is no doubt in Quran but there can be in tafaseer Don't Ibni Abas and Ibni Kaseer sometimes contradict each other so which one is the ultimate truth I say none is. for Allah says in Quran that as the time passes the truthfulness of Quran will get more evident not fade away... This clearly mentions that in future Quran will be better deciphered and old interpretations will certainly Change... Whoever reads this comment my request for those is that search for the truth and don't hinder yourself to think critically.... And Thinking is not a sin but a command of Allah the creator and all knowing....

[@abdulrahmanshahid8665]

Interesting take. However, it is interesting that there is no other human species present today (or for a while). While all other creatures have similar species present today.

[@kamranbasheer4659]

@@abdulrahmanshahid8665 Isn't extinction a reality?

[@abdulrahmanshahid8665]

@@kamranbasheer4659 isn't extinction a reality for all the other creatures that have similar species present today

[@kamranbasheer4659]

@@abdulrahmanshahid8665 Who will decide which should go under extinction and which not...

[@afsanaaktermila4714]

It was a good one!

[@Muslimah-ct9pm]

The messenger of Allah ( peace and blessings be upon him) said - whoever enters the market and says : La ilaha illAllah Wahdahu la shareeka lah , lahul Mulk wa lahul hamd , Yuhyi wa yumeet Wa huwa hayyu la yamoot Bi yadihil khayr Wahuwa Alaa kulli shay’in Qadeer. “None has the right to he worshipped except Allah, alone without partner , to him belongs All the sovereignty and praise. He gives life and causes death , and he is living and does not die. In his hand is all good and he is capaple of doing everything” Allah will wipe a million bad deed from his record and grant him a million good deeds , and will elevate him a million degree (of virtue) Tirmidhi No# 3428 and 3429

[@micdeymearstienbeiger37]

Is evolution a religion? See what atheist scientists say: "Modern evolutionary biology is a minor twentieth-century religious sect within the sprawling religious persuasion of Anglo-Saxon biology”. - Lynn Margulis, Prominent evolutionary biologist, agnostic Jew, professor at University of Massachusetts, Amherst. Michael Ruse, atheist philosopher of science thinks evolution is a religion. See his book: "Evolution As Religion". Julian Huxley, a prominent atheist evolutionary biologist, says evolution is a religion without revelation. He has written a book called, "Religion without Revelation". Masatoshi Nei says, "Darwin is a god in evolution, so you can’t criticize Darwin. If you do, you’re branded as arrogant." Thomas Nagel, Professor of Philosophy and Law Emeritus at New York University says, "People have been browbeaten into accepting evolution." They called him a "heretic" for challenging evolution! David Stove, atheist philosopher in "Darwinian Fairytales" says evolution is "a New Religion". David Gelernter, Yale University Professor says, "In rejecting Darwinism, "I am attacking their religion". "You take your life in your hands to challenge Darwinism intellectually. They will destroy you if you challenge Darwinism". It's time to wake up and stop worshipping evolution. It's a fake modern religion masquerading as science.

[@TmanRock9]

Sounds like a bunch of bias especially since the scientific theory of evolution can not by any definition be a religion. Some of these people even said they rejected it. This is like a flat earthier claiming physicist have formed a new religion about the round earth.

[@johngurvan8279]

Where were you not educated. Never heard so much rubbish. You do not even know what a religion is by definition.

[@CanalPSG]

I regret to tell you that random snippets of quotes do not count as proof. In what context did these scientists make these remarks? Where can I find them (book, article, page number)?

[@altonmassson]

Is it just me, or did this video say a lot of nothing 👀

[@zohaib4439]

It's just u

[@crtinsts5052]

@@zohaib4439 No. The video didn't said anything of value

[@samgrainger1554]

We are so far beyond the point where saying that some biologists disagree should prevent us taking the generally accepted view.

[@samkb6374]

We should accept Darwinian as popular model but not as a undeniable fact.

[@samgrainger1554]

@@samkb6374 I agree, but my comment is about something different. They implied (via saying that some biologists disagree) that there is more trouble with Darwinian evolution than there actually is. It's a popular model because every attempt to disprove it so far has failed. And there have been many attempts, so many that we can essentially take tge theory of evolution as an everyday fact, amost as sure as that you an I exist. The attempts however have ocasionally made refinements which have brought us to the Modern Synthesis. There is still more refinement and understanding to get out of it but Darwin got the gist. What I'm saying is that stating "some biologists disagree about elements of how evolotion works or that they disagree about the whole theory" is a dishonest rhetorical device.

[@easyijaz]

ماشاء اللہ

[@photoboothx7810]

It’s Darwin’s Theory not Darwin’s Fact

[@BUSeixas11]

In science, theory does not mean idle speculation

[@samkb6374]

@@BUSeixas11 It’s also still not a Law.

[@bigbomb6533]

@@samkb6374darwins theory of evolution cannot become become a law because laws are different from theories, there is isaac newton's law of gravity which we know exists and we have Einstein theory of relativity which explains it. Such as how dariwins theory of evolution (now it has changed since darwins time) explains how evolution occurs.

[@djordan7035]

Evolution is a fact! What ever theory you want to believe should be accepting of that.

[@mglow7855]

Evolution is a theory. Atheists are theorists

[@djordan7035]

@@mglow7855 Atheism is irrelevant. Evolution is an accepted theory because it's fact! Just like relativity.

[@Aquacrystal78]

By baseline definition of Evolution as a gradual change the occurs over a period of time.Yes it is Factual. However in popular understanding the darwanian theory dictates the meaning given to term Evolution.

[@djordan7035]

@@Aquacrystal78 I don't think anyone here is getting the baseline definition of evolution confused with Darwinism. DNA sequencing supports evolution by natural selection

[@aqiljavaid_]

Very informative

[@youman5079]

Great video🙌

[@Science_-]

Expected this video to give some conterfactual evidence to finally disprove evolution. Disappointed. I mean this guy seems to have a knack for attacking the weakest points of an argument or subject in order to sell his point. If he wants to really promote critical thinking, go directly at the strongest points man.

[@amardevaja5815]

Keep up the work.

[@abdulalimomar6116]

Those who believe in evolution theory will worship because all the energy on the earth comes from the sun.

[@emukhan3588]

This video is incorrect. Nei does not go against "Darwinian evolution". Mutation supplies the variation that natural selection acts upon. Also, Just-so stories don't challenge evolution as a whole. Not all traits are formed by natural selection. They can be formed by being an ancestral trait that was inherited, genetic drift, and sexual selection. An example is a giraffe where it is hypothesized that the long necks were formed by sexual selection. Evolution is a fact, just as gravity is a fact. Please educate yourselves about evolution and stop listening to this Dawah man who doesn't understand biology.

[@intranext1359]

If evolution is a fact then how did birds get wings why is ther only one intelligent life form on earth(humans) why is ther no intelligent life form on sea, which is bigger than land on earth

[@muhaiminsultan5827]

Suboor ahmad is one of the most educated fellows in the world with regards to evolution

[@crtinsts5052]

@@intranext1359 Check out pbs eons channel on youtube

[@superlegomaster55]

​@@muhaiminsultan5827does he have a degree in biology?

[@posintabook597]

Gravity is not a fact you noob

[@johngurvan8279]

The catholic church in the 1950s even acknowledged evolution is true.. If evolution did not exist why do babies become adults, do you just add more clay. 🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@MegaBlackheart94]

why music ??

[@sabrinaayoubi]

asalam o alaikum, i'm just wondering if i'm able to wear the hijab just for the month of ramadan or do i have to wear the hijab permanently? advice is much needed please :)

[@ahlulhadith6367]

Asalamu alaikum If you have reached puberty then the hijab is obligatory for you in the presence of non mahram. If you don't wear it now you should start before Ramadan to get used to it. And Ramadan is a Iman booster. The month of fasting and Quran and taraweh and dhikr and tahajjud. So it will in'sha'Allah be easier to stick with it even after ramadan. And if you slip up always repent and ask Allah for forgiveness regardless of the sin. The prophet (sallallahu alayhi wa sallam) taught Aisha (ra) a dua to say on laylatul qadr. Allahuma innaka afuwan tu hibul afwa fa afu anni. Oh Allah you are the forgiving and you love to forgive so forgive me. And Allah knows best

[@callistomalady6084]

wa alaikum salam sister. i'd say, just go for it in the month of Ramadan and do it purely for the sake of Allah. do not second guess it if you find your heart yearning to be in obedience of Allah (SWT). what happens after ramadan, you can deal with that when the time comes. you don't have to worry about it now. if Allah helps you, nothing can stop you from attaining the Love of Allah, His Forgiveness and His Jannah. 💪❤

[@sabrinaayoubi]

callisto malady thank you! i appreciate it

[@halalpolice23]

@@sabrinaayoubi Do it sis if you’re above 15 the hijab is mandatory to us a women and it’s up to you if you going to obey Allah SWT or disobey your creator but hijab is obligatory and we need to wear. Don’t just wear bc of Ramadan but wear because of Allah SWT and you want to be good Muslim who follow her Creator❤️❤️ May Allah SWT make easy for you

[@samgrainger1554]

You can do as you like

[@KonsolKombat]

Evolution itself against Science itself because every complex or even simple thing need a wise builder/creator. This like 0/1 in computer world, for example: If you write anything in notepad, the file become bigger and bigger, if no one write anything, then there was no document or text. And yes Allah created everything Elhamdulillah! Essalamu Aleykum!

[@mohammadtarek3842]

You are right as The three limitations of Darwin's theory concern the origin of DNA, the irreducible complexity of the cell, and the paucity of transitional species.

[@samantarmaxammadsaciid5156]

Don't you read the Qur’aan, Allaah’s creation and evolution are one!

[@takenhandle]

love u guys

[@Kuma_クマさん]

🌟 *kzbin.info/www/bejne/bJTCooWAgrSinqs*

[@alquranmetodetalqin9660]

Indeed, the example of Jesus in the sight of Allah is like that of Adam. He created him from dust, then said to him, “Be!” And he was! Ali 'Imran:59

[@KaiseruSoze]

Replace "some biologists" with "three biologists" and that should give you a stronger context.

[@mansoorkhanjadoon1360]

name every biologist

[@Kaplan4]

Nice But why music subhanAllah

[@nupsi6]

What a horrible monologue. No wonder the one listening in the video had a very bored look on his face and only went on and on doing "hmmm ..." "hmmm ..." "hmmm ..." What else is there to respond to such a confused monologue?

[@farzanak8107]

Its called 'Darwin's THEORY not Darwin's FACT'!! :)

[@Bill_Garthright]

It's not called either one. It's just modern biology. And evolution is both a fact _and_ a theory.

[@A-Pro100]

It's sad you guys have resorted to music in the background.

[@dronoid4659]

It's sad you've assumed that there's no debate on that topic and that all this people know nothing about it...

[@A-Pro100]

@@dronoid4659 I'm all ears! plz, let me know where I can find an argument for listening to musical instruments. I'd love it if you can supply a link or something. otherwise, you've probably assumed it's okay without doing the research yourself.

[@Edward-bm7vw]

@@A-Pro100 An "argument for listening to musical instruments"? What?? Who would even argue about something like that? That's on YOU to demonstrate. All we know - is that there is NO evidence whatsoever to say otherwise. In fact, science has shown music is very good for the brain - even people with dementia who has lost most abilities to do much can still play music and are soothed by it. It's very beneficial to humanity. If you've got any evidence to say otherwise besides some old book written by 7th century Arabs then go right head! But I highly doubt you have any

[@crtinsts5052]

For the real science check out PBS eons on KZbin

[@fuadsahinovic9532]

Thank you!

[@MeralynBartonico]

what a stupid analysis

[@dronoid4659]

Is there more discussion on the newer versions of the theory? On newer data ?

[@samgrainger1554]

These hypotheses seem to be additions to the theory

[@crtinsts5052]

Check out pbs eons on youtube.

[@JackReacher340]

Evolution is a fact. There are disputes on mechanism.

[@crtinsts5052]

@Sabir You have Neanderthal DNA. Do a DNA test

[@cyberyousef7519]

Nope it isn’t

[@khalidhmiftha3389]

Natural selection can't give sight.

[@crtinsts5052]

Yes it can

[@CaliphForCaliphate]

More Detail On Evolution. Playlist On Islam & Evolution: kzbin.info/aero/PLgrhw8sbiJg1n9XpyooRdOiTR2z8iLG9j

[@jamesginty6684]

have you check out "Exposing the Discovery Institute Part 1: Casey Luskin" and "How Creationism Taught Me Real Science 44 Lucy" on youtube. they shows how ignorant .Casey Luskin and discovery institute is.

[@Alikhan-tp4nn]

@Squad Y did yu get this testing

[@mahmudulhossain7420]

Allah "formed from water every living thing" (21:30),"We created man from sounding clay, from mud moulded into shape..." (15:26). And, "He began the creation of man from clay, and made his progeny from a quintessence of fluid" (32:7-8). "Allah's is the kingdom of the heavens and the earth and what is in them; and He has power over all things". (5:120) Darwins theory of Life evolving from water is valid, and ALLAH has complete control over everything in the universe, what seems random mutations to us are simply edits made by Allah through the control of the environment, But in case of Humans, we were DESIGNED using clay and mud specifically the same way things are designed in a lab ( clay and mud is essentially biomass and contains dna of other animals). Bruh whats so hard to understand from this ?

[@nigeldude9597]

Wow good video

[@Alikhan-tp4nn]

i am sorry onepath i had some idiots i had to wash out and rinse for the day.. so sorry for bugging..well be gone fast.. thnx..

[@Alikhan-tp4nn]

​ @Grimm Viper hay did yu get this just testing..

[@afsanaaktermila4714]

❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️

[@saifahmed4247]

Why background music?

[@vesuvandoppelganger]

Animals were popped into existence by a genius.

[@palani9376]

bro thats what im saying all you gotta ask a atheist is if we cone from apes where did the first animal cone from because they would need to evolve right illogical theory

[@youman5079]

@@palani9376 True, they will probably say organism, cells of bacteria 🤷🏻‍♂️

[@palani9376]

@@youman5079 ahah probably but that makes no sense bacteria isnt conscious it cant shape shift its like white blood cells it just does what its created doesnt just turn into a animal

[@youman5079]

@@palani9376 Yh true true

[@samgrainger1554]

@@palani9376 any particular cell of your own body isn't coconscious. The accepted account is not that you can take any one bacteria and make it become a human. The accepted account is that over many generations and on timescales that are impossible for us to truly wrap our heads arround: simple cells (over many generations each one slightly different from the last) became more complex cells and started to stick arround with eachother then this interaction between related cells began to become more complex untill you had very simple multicellular organisms which over many generations became more complex (all whilst the cells that were making them up continued to increase in complexity) untill you got more complicated animals and over many generations some of them eventually some of them turned into us. The begining of the first cell is one that's not yet fully understood but many of the components of a very simple cell can be created by recreating early earth conditions in a container (lightning and tides and rocks etc). And other steps towards cells e.g. RNA self replication 'machines' or lipid bilayers have been shown to be able to spontaneously arise given the right conditions. Something interesting: Our cells are actually most likely decendants of cells that engulfed other cells but by chance didn't destroy them. The engulfed cells became our miticondria which have their own bacteria like genome.

[@Ahmed-pl2gb]

why is there musical instruments

[@Proximittee]

Brother, it is super faint and it's there to create an atmosphere, not amusement. Also, this video isn't about Islam, so respectively, they limit this to all people of all beliefs, such as athiests

[@Edward-bm7vw]

Why? Got a problem with music??

[@SadiqKhan-pe6dw]

Why can,t we find completely varaiant of humans .

[@Edward-bm7vw]

They used to exist. They're all dead

[@yotose]

i havent seen people grow wings like the bird, only then maybe evolution might be a 'thing'.

[@samgrainger1554]

Ever seen a squirrel use its skin between its limbs to glide or a frog use the skin between its digits to glide? If over many many generations this ability was selected for then eventually they may be able to properly fly with powered flight. Humans are very unlikely to evolve wings because we are don't have a strong selective pressure gradient (a need to slow our falls, a need to glide, a need to fly) and the parts of out body most likely to evolve into wings (our arms and hands) already have a very useful purpose and evolution towards wings would make them less good at doing what they do currently. Evolution isn't a prosses is able to jump to a different solution.

[@samgrainger1554]

Human and animal evolution aside, evolution is a more simple and wide spread phenomenon. If you have something that can make more of itself (replicators) and when it does it doesn't make a perfect copy then over many generations those replicators will be somewhat different to the first ones. That's all that evolution is. You can in your own head play this out and see that it makes sense. Over many generations the replicators will get better at replicating themselves because the ones that are better in each generation have more 'ofspring'. What makes it better depends on its environment and selective pressures. This is natural selection. You can see computer programs that put in a replicatior (a stick figure say) and put in the basic rules that is gets to have 'ofspring' in the next generation if it walks the furthest and out comes a multi generational prosses if better and better walkers. This is the essence of evolution and you can see it applies to many things.

[@LEAHKAMAL]

من فضلك اضيفو اللغة العربيه

[@arkaazizul6673]

Huh Checkmate darwinists!!

[@wildbeast1016]

*WAKE UP EVERYONE EVOLUTION IS FAKE AND THE EARTH IS FLAT DO RESEARCH* BELIEVING IN A BALL EARTH IS BELIEVING IN EVOLUTION ↓↓↓ أَفَلَا يَنظُرُونَ إِلَى الْإِبِلِ كَيْفَ خُلِقَتْ - 88:17 Then do they not look at the camels - how they are created? وَإِلَى السَّمَاءِ كَيْفَ رُفِعَتْ - 88:18 And at the sky - how it is raised? وَإِلَى الْجِبَالِ كَيْفَ نُصِبَتْ - 88:19 and the mountains-how they were firmly set up وَإِلَى الْأَرْضِ كَيْفَ سُطِحَتْ - 88:20 and the earth-how it was levelled out? فَذَكِّرْ إِنَّمَا أَنتَ مُذَكِّرٌ - 88:21 Remind them, for thou art but a remembrancer لَّسْتَ عَلَيْهِم بِمُصَيْطِرٍ - 88:22 You are not over them a controller. وَٱلْأَرْضَ بَعْدَ ذَٰلِكَ دَحَاهَآ - 79:30 and, after that, He spread out the earth. وَجَعَلْنَا ٱلسَّمَآءَ سَقْفًۭا مَّحْفُوظًۭا ۖ وَهُمْ عَنْ ءَايَـٰتِهَا مُعْرِضُونَ - 21:32 And We made the sky a protected ceiling, but they, from its signs,1 are turning away. أَفَلَمْ يَنظُرُوٓا۟ إِلَى ٱلسَّمَآءِ فَوْقَهُمْ كَيْفَ بَنَيْنَـٰهَا وَزَيَّنَّـٰهَا وَمَا لَهَا مِن فُرُوجٍۢ - 50:6 Did they not, then, look to the sky above them, how We have built it and beautified it, and it has no cracks? وَٱلسَّمَآءَ بَنَيْنَـٰهَا بِأَيْي۟دٍۢ وَإِنَّا لَمُوسِعُونَ - 51:47 And the sky was built by Us with might; and indeed We are the expanders. وَٱلْأَرْضَ فَرَشْنَـٰهَا فَنِعْمَ ٱلْمَـٰهِدُونَ - 51:48 As for the earth, We spread it out. How superbly did We smooth it out! وَإِلَى ٱلْأَرْضِ كَيْفَ سُطِحَتْ - 88:20 and the earth-how it was levelled out وَهُوَ ٱلَّذِى خَلَقَ ٱلَّيْلَ وَٱلنَّهَارَ وَٱلشَّمْسَ وَٱلْقَمَرَ ۖ كُلٌّۭ فِى فَلَكٍۢ يَسْبَحُونَ - 21:33 And He (is) The One Who created the night and the daytime, and the sun and the moon, each swimming in an orbit. Also I know some people will claim that the word دَحَاهَا means an ostrich egg which is fals the word means flat I know they claim this because they want earth and Quran to prove that the earth is just like what NASA said but no Allah words are perfect and must not changed

[@Omar-_-_]

What earth is flat??? And you also referred it to the Quran!

[@Ali_7.8.6]

Daily Reminder: Try to supplicate these duas every single day habitually 1. Dua That Guarantees You Forgiveness (Sahih Al-Bukhari) Prophet Muhammad SAW (PBUH) said: "Whoever gets up at night and says: La ilaha 'illa Allaahu, wahdahu la shareeka lahul mulku, wa lahul hamdu, wa huwa ala kulli shayin qadeer. Subhana allaahi, wal hamdu lillaahi, wa la illaaha ila Allaah, wa Allaahu akbar, waLa hawla wa la quwwata illa billaah. There is none worthy of worship in truth except Allah Alone, He has no partners, He has the Dominion and for Him is all praise, and He is capable of all things, praise is for Him, and Far is Allah from imperfection, and There is none worthy of worship in truth except Allah, and Allah is the Greatest, there is no capability nor is there any power except with Allah. "Then he says: Allaahumma aghfirlee. O Allah forgive me! Or he supplicates and his supplication is answered, and if he makes Wudhu and prays, then his prayer is accepted. 2. Dua That Guarantees You Jannah (Sahih Al-Jami, An-Nasa'i, Ibn Hibban) Prophet Muhammad SAW (PBUH) said: "Whoever recites Ayatul Kursi, verse 255 from chapter number 2, Surat Al Baqarah after every obligatory prayer, then nothing is stopping him or her from entering Jannah, except one thing: Death." 3. Dua That Wipe Away Sins (Sahih Al-Bukhari, Muslim, At-Tirmidhi) Prophet Muhammad SAW (PBUH) said: "Whoever says: Subhana allaahi, wa bihamdih How far from imperfections Allah is, and I praise Him. "a hundred times during the day, his sins are wiped away, even if they are like the foam of the sea." 4. Phrases That Are Heavier On The Scales Than An Entire Morning Of Recitation (Sahih Muslim) Prophet Muhammad SAW (PBUH) said: "I recited four words three times after I had left you. If these are to be weighed against all you have recited since morning, these will be heavier." These are: Subhan-Allahi wa bihamdihi, 'adada khalqihi, wa rida nafsihi, wa zinatah 'arshihi, wa midada kalimatihi. Allah is free from imperfection and I begin with His praise, as many times as the number of His creatures, in accordance with His Good Pleasure, equal to the weight of His Throne and equal to the ink that may be used in recording the words (for His Praise). 5. Dua To Stay On The Right Path (Sahih Muslim) Ya musarrifa-l quloobi sarrif qalbi ala ta’atik. O, Allah! The One Who turns the hearts, turn my heart towards Your obedience. 6. Dua To Be Save From Totrments Of Grave Allahumma inni wa a'udhu bika min adhabil qabri O, Allah! Saves us from the torments of the grave. 7. Dua For The Best In The Dunya And Hereafter Rabbana atina fid-dunya hasanatan, wa fil'akhirati hasanatan, waqina 'adhaban-nar. O, Allah! Our Lord give us all the good of this world, and the good of the hereafter, and Save us from the punishment of the Fire. 8. Dua To Help Pay Off Your Debts (Sahih At-Tirmidhi) Allahum-makfinee bi halaalika 'an haraamika wa aghninee bifadhlika 'amman siwaaka O, Allah! Suffice me with what You have allowed instead of what You have forbidden, and make me independent of all others besides You. 9. Dua Of The Treasures Of Paradise (Sahih Al-Bukhari, At-Tirmidhi) Prophet Muhammad SAW (PBUH) said: "Shall I not tell you of a word which is one of the treasures of Paradise?" La hawla wa la quwaata illa billah There is no power and no strength except with Allah. 10. Dua To Literally Boost Your Energy Before you sleep recite: Subhana allaah 33x, Alhamdulilah 33x, Allahu akbar 34x 11. Dua That Protects You From All Evil, Magic And Affliction (Sahih Ibn Majah, Abu Dawud, At-Tirmidhi) Bismillaahil-lathee laa yadhurru ma'as-mihi shay'un fil-'ardhi wa laa fis-samaa'i wa Huwas-Samee'ul-'Aleem. In the Name of Allah, Who with His Name nothing can cause harm in the earth nor in the heavens, and He is the All-Hearing, the All-Knowing. 12. Dua To Get Prophet Muhammad SAW (PBUH) Help in Yawm Al Qiyamah (Sahih Al-Bukhari) Prophet Muhammad SAW (PBUH) said: "Whoever says the following, after hearing the call of adhan, the call of prayer I will intercede for them yawm al qiyamah." Allaahumma Rabba haathihid-da 'watit-taammati wassalaatil-qaa'imatah, Aati Muhammadanil-waseelata walfadheelah, Wab 'ath-hu maqaamam-mahmoodanil-lathee wa'adtah. O, Allah! the Lord of this perfect call, and the lord of the prayer that is about to be established, grant Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) al waseela, Resurrect him with that status, that is so praise worthy, which you have already promised. 13. Dua Forgiveness All Believers Allahumma ighfir lil muslimeena wal-muslimaat, wal-mu'mineena wal-mu'minaat, al-ahyaa'i minhom wal-amwat. O, Allah! forgive the Muslim men and Muslim women, the believing men and the believing women, the alive from them and the dead. 14. Benefits Reciting Surah Ikhlas - Reciting 3 times a day is equivalent to reciting the whole Qur'an. - Reciting 10 times a day and Allah will build for him a house in paradise. 15. Sayyidul Istighfar (Sahih Al-Bukhari, Sahih Al-Jami, At-Tirmidhi) Prophet Muhammad SAW (PBUH) said: If somebody recites this invocation (given below) during the day, and if he should die then, he will be from the people of Jannah. And if he recites it in the night, and if he should die on the same day, he will be from the people of Jannah.” Allahuma anta Rabbi la ilaha illa anta, Khalaqtani wa ana 'Abduka, wa ana 'ala 'ahdika wa wa 'dika mastata 'tu, A 'udhu bika min Sharri ma sana'tu, abu'u Laka bini'matika'alaiya, wa abu'u laka bidhanbi faghfir lee fa innahu la yaghfiru adhdhunuba illa anta. O, Allah! You are my Lord! None has the right to be worshipped but You. You created me and I am Your slave, and I am faithful to my convenant and my promise as much as I can. I seek refuge with You from all the evil I have done. I acknowledge before You all the blessings You have bestowed upon me, and I confess to You all my sins. So I entreat You to forgive my sins, for nobody can forgive sins except You. 16. Dua For Protection From Shirk Allahumma inni a`udhu bika an ushrika bika wa ana a`lamu wa astaghfiruka lima la a`lam O, Allah! I seek refuge in You from knowingly associating partners with You, and I seek your forgiveness for that which I do not know. Brothers and Sisters please memorize these duas and surahs with proper tajweed with the intention of pleasing Allah SWT. Please copy and paste this comment so that you may benefit the brothere and sisters who come across it as well as yourselves. Remember brothers and sisters even though it seems like the whole world is against us, if we are on the straight path, sincere and do not waver from the straight path, we will be victorious inshallah.

[@Aloksheoran]

Nonsense argument

[@karimtit4897]

Doubt Islam. If you see all the evidence on evolution and doubt it ok. But then doubt Islam too.

[@cyberyousef7519]

You doubt all the evidences about islam first, and evolution doesn’t have evidences

[@openyuheyeby8674]

People don't understand when their being lied too. Stick your nose in the Quran and Hadith. Don't focus on the bogus

[@Bill_Garthright]

_People don't understand when their being lied too._ Exactly! They just believe Muslim apologists because that's what they were taught to believe as children and they really, really _want_ it to be true. It's the same reason Christians believe Christian apologists, Hindus believe Hindu apologists, Mormons believe Mormon apologists, etc.

[@openyuheyeby8674]

@@Bill_Garthright okay... Hahaahah. Are you an atheist? Then I will know how to respond to your, "comment".

[@Bill_Garthright]

@@openyuheyeby8674 _okay_ So you _agree_ with me? I'm surprised. I mean, it's obvious. Worldwide, faith-based people _overwhelmingly_ believe in whatever religion and whatever god or gods they were taught to believe as a child. But generally speaking, theists don't like to admit that, and I guess I just assumed that you were a theist. _Are you an atheist?_ Yes. Typically, I ask religious people for *one piece of good evidence* that their god is real, rather than just imaginary. Just *one.* And so far, I haven't heard any. So that's why I'm an atheist. How about you?

[@openyuheyeby8674]

You're a bit childish but I like that. You can't make someone give you ONE evidence to make you believe in the most high. It's like saying make me a tea with just water. I've studied vedas, Tao, Buddhism, old, new, Quran. So we can sit down together have a discussion, debate whatever. But humble yourself to people with beliefs. Just because they believe in something and you don't. Don't make you smarter or better of a human being. And why assume I was taught my belief. My dad's an atheist and my mom's hindu. I was taught nothing. Logical thinking intelligent people should not assume. Ask questions, that's how we learn. And yes like you said. It is a belief! All religions are. You cannot prove it tangibly but, they way I started is prove the books to be wrong. Every book can be ruled out but one. One is flawless with no contradictions no ridiculous statements or commandments, so to me that is proof right now.

[@cr-pz5ou]

Flat earth

[@Justme-zp3el]

“For God so loved the world that He gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in Him shall not perish but have eternal life.”-John 3:16❤️