The main thing that puts me off MoW2 is the lack of a UK/Commonwealth faction - and especially when they did an Operation Overlord campaign, in which the majority of the troops were UK and Commonwealth. I think that's a real shame.
@buckcherry25643 ай бұрын
those got added later in MOWAS2 same with japan
@portman89093 ай бұрын
They'll likely get added later for free or maybe as DLC.
@omare46823 ай бұрын
the developers i belive russians what you expect it will be rubbish game
@buckcherry25643 ай бұрын
@@omare4682 They are Ukrainian. Even if they were Russian that doesnt automatically make them bad devs. your comment is ignorant and weak-minded.
@markussuppe3 ай бұрын
@@omare4682 devs are from Ukraine
@Oshnook3 ай бұрын
As a long time fan of the men of war games, I was just hoping they would stick to their roots. Instead it appears that they tried to make the game more like CoH to try and attract a more casual audience. Which kind of alienates the core fans of the men of war series.
@twiglets23 ай бұрын
@Oshnook The "realism" mode does pull it back towards the old school men of war, though I appreciate that is not enough for some
@VMUDream3 ай бұрын
@Oshnook That is simply not true. Call to arms had the same realism mode.
@HughJon-ni1he3 ай бұрын
Watch Rimmy a famous clusterf*ck arma KZbinr and his review on the game
@ninhkhang913 ай бұрын
I was thinking the same. The demos and models look arcady for me
@VMUDream3 ай бұрын
@@HughJon-ni1he rimmy said the same things about call to arms when it came out and he is now telling people to buy call to arms, guys full of shit
@FORTHEPI3 ай бұрын
Thank you for the rather objective and unbiased review.
@twiglets23 ай бұрын
@FORTHEPI my pleasure!
@CaptainCrowd43 ай бұрын
As someone who has sunk in about 160 hours into Gates of Hell, well over 800 hours between all three COH games. I am enjoying the game, because of the different styled games that I have played. From realistic to arcade like RTS, it feels right for me. I understand where the core fan base is coming from. As they expected something entirely different. I think for MOW2, you just have to come at it with a different approach.
@twiglets23 ай бұрын
@evgeniyvodolazov1798 I couldn't agree more, thanks for sharing
@chantan93583 ай бұрын
Thanks for that two minute TLDR! Ive never came across your channel before but I like how you do things! Keep it up!
@twiglets23 ай бұрын
@chantan9358 thank you! Hope it was useful
@negima12763 ай бұрын
Extra factions will undoubtedly be added as DLC
@twiglets23 ай бұрын
@@negima1276 agreed, and a shame they are unlikely to be free additions. One of the main appeals of assault squad 2 was the number of factions as standard
@Napswhilewatchin3 ай бұрын
1:33 Still think they changed the tank damage models. Tanks take alot less damage and almost all of the tanks explode when HP hits 0. Also the claim "Hull HP was always a thing" is strange. In older MoW and GoH, tanks can sometimes take an absurd amount of penetrating shots, without beeing disabled/destroyed. Something about the tanks is off.
@jacksheldon85663 ай бұрын
Are you talking about realism or competitive setting? The hp thing in other mow games and GOH is true. You can still damage all tank components in mow2. The weird feeling must come from mowas2 where tanks could randomly get one shot because of an RNG system.
@Weihnachtskeks953 ай бұрын
IMHO i think the game is more balanced now, you can kill any Tank kinda easy.. i dont like the HP thing... in AS2, as far as i can remember, i never noticed something like HP.. just armor thicknes and penetration. yet its a great game and i love playing it.
@buckcherry25643 ай бұрын
Realisim mode makes tanks survive "death" to be stolen far more often
@ChrisSmith-yw6tn3 ай бұрын
I think it's possible they had a sort of abstract hp bar that was hidden, although I did notice that in the new game, tanks seems to die outright a lot more than being repairable like in the other games. I also noticed it seems like AT grenades "lock" to vehicles, whereas soldiers would miss often in the older games.
@Detrian1593 ай бұрын
Simply not true. If you don't hit anything that causes an instant loss, it takes exactly five shots from a P4F2 to destroy a Tiger in GoH. Every time. I uploaded a video showing as much and if you search for HEALTH, HEALTHBARS, THE TRUTH! on google/Steam, you can find a post from the GoH devs themselves explaining they use HP too.
@joshuamarengo31452 ай бұрын
Just wantedto say thanks. Your channel provides so much content on a genre where its not easy to find well such structured and tought out material. hope you can continue dong this for as much as you want to! cheers mate
@twiglets22 ай бұрын
@joshuamarengo3145 Thank you! Kind words such as yours keep me trying to improve :)
@xxxbg311Ай бұрын
is this game has first person mode?
@MightyMordoogle3 ай бұрын
I tried watching a number of KZbin videos about MoW2 but none of them gave me a great sense of what to expect, until I watched this video. So thanks very much @twiglets2, this was the best video I've seen yet on MoW2 and it convinced me to give the game I shot. As someone who owns but barely played the previous games in the MoW series but played many many hours of modded CoH, CoH2 and someone who also rates more or less all WW2 RTS games against the venerable Close Combat series I grew up playing in the late 90s, I have to admit I was struggling to decide whether to try out MoW2 or not. I passed on CoH3 because I felt it looked/felt a lot more "arcadey" than CoH2 or CoH1 but I also really struggled to get into the MoWAS games because it just felt extremely clunky and required so much micromanagement of individual squads which is not really to my taste. Hopefully MoW2 will fill the void that's been missing in my WW2 RTS heart since I stopped playing CoH2 Spearhead Mod years ago. Thanks again @twiglets2!
@twiglets23 ай бұрын
@MightyMordoogle you're welcome, I hope it was useful! I suspect you will find the same clunkiness in men of war 2 but there is a decent chance it will be right for you based on what you say. The settings are very flexible!
@necromorphassasin3 ай бұрын
I knew something was fishy when the reviews on steam were at mostly positive when mere 1 hour of minimum playtime filter was applied. Thanks for this review.
@twiglets23 ай бұрын
@necromorphassasin I was today years old when I learned you could filter reviews that way... Thank you!
@jacksheldon85663 ай бұрын
The game had multiple beta
@ranger_savage84063 ай бұрын
People played the betas. I had like 40 hours in the betas, 0.7 hours ingame before I refunded. Would you have rather I idled the game for 40+ hours before posting my review I already knew was true?
@praevasc42993 ай бұрын
Do soldiers have an option to automatically pick up ammo for their main gun in a short radius around them? The lack of this was the most infuriating thing in the original. The original was fun for small infiltration-type missions with only a few men, but for any larger scale there was too much micromanagement.
@jacksheldon85663 ай бұрын
In all gamemodes with the frontline, all units auto resupply on the spot when staying inside your frontline area... ^^"
@twiglets23 ай бұрын
@praevasc4299 the units auto resupply when near an ammo truck or ammo box which is kinda neat
@GattobuonoАй бұрын
Probably one of the most comprehensive and unbiased game reviews I've come across!
@twiglets2Ай бұрын
@@Gattobuono thank you my friend, that means a lot!
@steinmetz4092 ай бұрын
The battalion recruitment gives me some nostalgia from another old great Codename Panzers Phase One. You had to choose your battle group before each match, and would have no reinforcements. Was a great game. You convinced me to give this a shot.
@twiglets22 ай бұрын
@steinmetz409 I hope you enjoy it!
@MaceUK713 ай бұрын
Was on the fence about this game due to hearing things you mentioned as rumours online. But after watching your excellent review I'm buying it! Thanks for the review and I've subbed too :)
@twiglets23 ай бұрын
@MaceUK71 thank you, I'm glad it was useful!
@ian48463 ай бұрын
The UI is so confusing. As someone who played MoWAS2 and GoH ostfront, the new dumbed down ui is so confusing. I can’t figure out how to make my soldiers repair a vehicle. There’s no button I can find for it and pressing r doesn’t work. There’s a lot of examples like that.
@twiglets23 ай бұрын
@ian4846 Ah yes, the UI! To me the layout is just not logical. It took me ages to find the repair button, and also how to get vehicles to drop off their passengers without the driver also getting out! A bit of a mess really
@ian48463 ай бұрын
@@twiglets2 I think they tried to simplify it but in reality they made it more complicated
@twiglets23 ай бұрын
@@ian4846 classic!
@JozefRM2 ай бұрын
@Twiglets2 tanks do not use HP bars because they use realistic armor penetration properties.
@vonvonvonvonvonvonvonvonvo70093 ай бұрын
"If you enjoy GoH or MoWAS2 you will enjoy MoW2" is just false, every person I know that likes MoW2 are people who haven't played or didn't like the previous titles, it is a pure downgrade on so many levels to the older titles, and no, the realism mode does not at all fix the reasons for it's terribleness, you still have the ni-immortal healthbar tanks that the KV-2 always wins with infantry made of tissue paper.
@shpoopyshpoop3 ай бұрын
Everybody keeps saying it's a downgrade and yet I never see anybody explain how. I literally went back and forth between this and GoH and besides GoH looking better I literally couldn't tell much apart between the two. Both had things I like and dislike about.
@Neon_guyy3 ай бұрын
What a load of rubbish this game is great
@nupe198653183 ай бұрын
Just subscribed. This is the most unbiased review yet. I feel like the Steam comments are point crying about always being online and voice acting. If that is what makes the game bad, then sign me up.
@twiglets23 ай бұрын
@nupe19865318 welcome aboard! If there are any games you would like to see reviewed, please let me know!
@reinach773 ай бұрын
yeah the "tank hp is visible" I can't stand it.
@nupe198653183 ай бұрын
@@reinach77 turn on realism then
@reinach773 ай бұрын
@@nupe19865318 I don't think you understood it was a quote
@nupe198653183 ай бұрын
@@reinach77 lol my bad for missing the quotation. I’ll take the L
@TheFlohRiDa3 ай бұрын
Absolutely love your review, thank you so much.
@twiglets23 ай бұрын
@TheFlohRiDa thank you for watching!
@gunhojput3 ай бұрын
Thanks twiglets2 im trying to like this one but it is hit or miss with me some things are ooh! but a lot else is meeeh! your comment on arcadey is spot on. love to all.
@twiglets23 ай бұрын
@gunhojput I completely agree with the mixed feelings, thanks for sharing!
@HansAlRachid3 ай бұрын
Always online requirements are an instant disqualifier for me. I don't care how good your game is, that does not fly.
@twiglets23 ай бұрын
@HansAIRachid you're not alone on that one. They have said that introducing an offline mode is their top priority at the moment, we shall see how long that takes to introduce....
@creedleader55833 ай бұрын
After watching this and your Assault Squad 2 review, I went with Assault Squad 2. The best edition of AS2 is just $9.50USD on Steam, and as someone who always wanted to try out an RTS in this style but doesn't wanna drop $45 on a kinda iffy entry in the series I think I'll be content with my choice.
@twiglets23 ай бұрын
@creedleader5583 I think you made the right choice. Assault squad 2 is a brilliant game and a way to dip your toe. If you like assault squad 2 you will enjoy men of war 2, but should also consider gates of hell Ostfront. Enjoy!
@CmdrSoCal3 ай бұрын
Owned by the CCP. Developed by Ukranian POWs.
@archangel64973 ай бұрын
Yeah I was so excited when I heard this was coming out then I saw it. It reminded me of COH3 which is sad no real improvements that really shake anything up the graphics are pretty much the same and the only 3 factions was the deal breaker. But the worse part is the the idea of cosmetics its sad to see it failing almost has the same amount of player in MOWAS2.
@twiglets23 ай бұрын
@arxhangel6497 yeah they seem to have played it safe by not changing much and making it easier to play with friends. Personally the 3 factions is the biggest disappointment. Having a tonne of factions in MowAS2 was the best bit!
@cirmothe93 ай бұрын
Great review. I like the excessive amount of single player modes. You don't really see that much these days. I loved assault squad 2. But I never got into gates of hell as much as other people. So it being more of a sidegrade to gates of hell is fine by me.
@twiglets23 ай бұрын
@cirmothe9 it sounds like you'll have a great time with Men of War 2, enjoy!
@buckcherry25643 ай бұрын
if you liked AS2 (an AS2 so fan myself) you will enjoy this one. They dropped the ball on a few things (could have updated the UI and made the menu not abysmal), but the game play is solid, and I LOVE being able to comp-stomp with a friend without the game randomly assigning units to eachother. IMPORTANT: for an AS2 veteran, you CAN set the deployment mode back to AS2 style away from the echelon system. also the more familiar AS2 feeling missions are actually in the MP lobby under incursions, just assign bots and make it private.
@a.bridges3 ай бұрын
Great review as always sir! Thank you very much!
@twiglets23 ай бұрын
My pleasure!
@Britephartt3 ай бұрын
Why is this no better than MOWAS 2 from 13 years ago? My least favourite devs because they've take my favourite game and wasted it's potential.
@twiglets23 ай бұрын
@Britephartt You don't have to buy a dlc to play a skirmish against the ai, that's a pretty good upgrade over MowAS2!
@iTomBass3 ай бұрын
Honestly to me it doesn't feel like MOW/AS2 at all. If it was at least comparable to AS2 I would at least feel somewhat happy with my purchase. Instead everything feels ten steps backwards and 'off' in a way it can be hard to describe. Infantry feel like pointless cannon fodder compared to older games. Vehicles are overly fast and the armour/penetration system leads a lot to be desired (even on the realism mode people harp on about). The regiment system leads to so many problems and feels like you barely have enough units. Even the 'classic' mode has problems. Repairing your own tank or AT gun? (which somehow hasn't blown up - so many unnecessary ammo explosions too but that's another point) well you better be sure you haven't called in another unit in that time otherwise you are hit with the 'Not enough CP to use allied unit' message....because that's fun. Shooting an enemy with a machine gun on your tank via direct control? Well better be sure they are in range and not on the edge of being out of range otherwise you will immediately stop shooting and receive a message simply saying 'too far'.... like literally what the fck? Who thought this was a good idea? Why not have a damage drop off like every other game in the series? Gates of Hell is simply better in almost every aspect. I wasn't expecting a GoH 2 but I was hoping for a somewhat coherent game that could at least bring some competition between the products but it's just so shallow. Don't get me wrong, there are some things I like. Though the list is very minor. Custom trenches and fortifications are nice but these take a long time to construct to the point where it feels like they don't gel with the fast pace nature of the game. Like I'd just want this expanded trench system in Gates of Hell. It's just awful decision after awful decision to the point where it doesn't feel like Men of War and this is before we even talk about always online and the steep price of the game. I've been playing this series since 2006 and this is just baffling....
@CastleKnightAO2 ай бұрын
how is the performance? one downside i noticed with MOWAS 2 is no matter how good your PC is it can't utilize it maybe due to limitations with the game engine, my usage don't exceed 40% it's like my computer don't even recognize I'm playing a game but that doesn't mean i have a good experience with large battles as the game engine can't fully utilize my hardware I'm getting single digit fps. I hope the new MOW 2 is a different story
@twiglets22 ай бұрын
@CastleKnightAO From my experience it is better as the engine has been upgraded. Though it's by no means perfect!
@omgabaddonАй бұрын
The UI being shit seems to be a staple of RTS since 2002. For some reason, Warcraft 3 is the only game so far that gives enough customization options until this day, despite being over 2 decades old and having to fiddle with a shitty text file. But the capabilities were there! I honestly think fixing the UI in RTS would revive the whole genre no cap. The vast majority of people who think RTS are hard is because UI and controls are shit so you never really get to play the game as intended, and it creates the worst experience possible for casual players.
@twiglets2Ай бұрын
@@omgabaddon it's a good point, though I'm not sure what they would do differently, any ideas?
@vintagedude59053 ай бұрын
Ive always liked the men of war series, played it since it was called faces of war. i really like the direct controll ability, just command a scquad here and there while you direct controll a soldier you outfitted with a big machine gun. Speaking of outfitting soldiers, is there still a inventory system in the game? like you can go to a dead soldier, pick up their weapon and grenades, and also pick up med kits and repair kits to heal soldiers and repair tanks. Its always been the case in previous games, i wonder if its also still in this game since you did not showed it in this review.
@twiglets23 ай бұрын
@vintagedude5905 absolutely, the inventory is basically the same in this game as it was in previous games.
@vintagedude59053 ай бұрын
@@twiglets2 Cool, good to know. i really love that aspect of this game series, it makes it unique compared to other RTS games. its also a lot of fun, and being able to repair enemy tanks is also fun and increases your win chances.
@valyshknee42032 ай бұрын
yeah i kinda grown to dislike the men of war series, sadly the last good one was men of war assault squad 2, and then i moved on to gates of hell. which is better than men of war in pretty much every way i know of, better game modes (especially last stand), better missions, higher graphics which keeps you satsified even years after release and playing it just like i am constantly, everytime i play even years later i sometimes just zoom in all the way and admire the battle from a soldier's perspective, if anything gates of hell is the much better option and i suggest everyone buy that instead of men of war 2.
@EmberFall_2 ай бұрын
I'm interested in this game. I love Assault squad 2. I'm just waiting to see if they actually remove the online thing.
@twiglets22 ай бұрын
They have said they will, let's hope they keep their promise!
@sheldonlaney83153 ай бұрын
So I know many people want MoW2 to resemble Assault Squad, which is completely valid, but considering the amount of titles (triple a or not) that are absolutely NOT doing the right thing (aka EFT, Battlefield, CoD, Star Citizen), MoW2 is a breath of fresh air. If you expect it to be a certain way, it can often lead to disappointment when you are not the one developing the game. But MoW2 is FUN, and they are giving the power to the people through modding and campaigns and that is worth it to me. I bought it just to figure out if I’d like it, but I played well past the 2 hours steam required for you to get a refund
@twiglets23 ай бұрын
@sheldonlaney8315 I'm excited to see what comes out of the modding community for this game!
@thesilentdj42792 ай бұрын
Great review...really well thought out. Thanks!
@twiglets22 ай бұрын
@@thesilentdj4279 thank you! I hope it was useful
@sebparry33943 ай бұрын
At 9:16, is a British Cromwell Tank right?
@couragepizzapizzas15992 ай бұрын
Its a churchil that was shooting
@Lem793Ай бұрын
Nope, That's a british heavy tank, Churchill.
@JamezGamez13 ай бұрын
Your mic took me to Heaven, dayum
@twiglets23 ай бұрын
@JamezGamez1 you're welcome!
@varyagace3 ай бұрын
The biggest problem with this game is how all of it is made out of a recycled failed live service game. Almost all of it's problems can be traced back to that, chief among all and the very first hard dealbreaker, being always online. Then, you get into the game design, which owes many of it's choices due to that, too. 5v5 teams being the default on most gamemodes (filling your team with AI even if you're playing solo) because they wanted to make WW2 League of Legends, tanks trying to be World of Tanks (which honestly is the worst tank game and where the health bars and shot pen indicators came from) and then the choice of "deckbuilding" because back in the live service game they made you grind or pay real money to unlock more units to use. Then, after all that, there is the game _feel_ which is completely ruined. Sure it doesn't feel as "hardcore" as Gates of Hell, but it also feels worse than MOWAS2!! That's what fucks me up. I'm fine with more colors and faster combat, but it still is worse than their own most popular old game. Then there is the UI which is universally considered shit even by people who gave the game good reviews, and the one thing you failed to mention, which I think is still an important thing, is how the balance is absolutely fucked up, with cross-map artillery hitting your spawn from the start of the game. And so many of these things could still be fixed, if they actually listened to the feedback people like me gave them from the betas. There's so many small details that are just bad compared to AS2. Going back to the "Online only" thing, also have to mention: you tell people to wait for mods, but MODS WON'T WORK ON AN ONLINE ONLY GAME. Not when the game isn't running on your own machine. So they ruined the one thing that made their franchise so beloved and long lasting. Until they fix all of those things, I won't be spending money on this game, and honestly I don't think they ever will. It would require making most of the game again from scratch.
@shotgunbadger3 ай бұрын
mods literally work on it right now what are you talking about
@twiglets23 ай бұрын
@varyagace Thanks for sharing! I'm pretty sure mods do work? I'm happy to be wrong on that...
@MaximusGermanicus-df8js3 ай бұрын
It's garbage.
@aXPw392 ай бұрын
I'm waiting for the offline update.
@twiglets22 ай бұрын
@AxpW39 I predict a large spike in players once the offline update arrives.
@dakinoytc9863 ай бұрын
Conclusion Men Of War 2 is not a bad game, just not my style compare of CTA East Front. Thank you Twiglets2 :)
@mattkramer71373 ай бұрын
Is the AI pathing better than Company of Heroes 1? Thats all I need to know
@twiglets23 ай бұрын
@mattkramer7137 I think worse, it's very bad in this game! Hopefully they will be making it better though
@thishandleisavailableplease3 ай бұрын
MoW2 vehicles do have HP mechanics tho, try shooting a tank's turret enought times and it will explode, at least with Realism Mode Off.
@shotgunbadger3 ай бұрын
oh wow you turned realism mode off and it was less realistic?
@twiglets23 ай бұрын
@thishandleisavailableplease Yes they do, but from what others have said they seem to not realise you can still disable parts of the tank and individual crew members, which I think it's important to highlight that you can!
@corneliusthegreat67943 ай бұрын
I kinda think that men of War 2 will never have as many mods as assault squad I hope I'm wrong about that we're looking at newer games now it's not promising
@twiglets23 ай бұрын
I hope you are wrong too! Only time will tell
@bsdetector69083 ай бұрын
You do not know the power of nerds. Good modern RTS games are in short supply, nerds will be all over this.
@twiglets23 ай бұрын
@@bsdetector6908 nerds unite!
@anenvironmentalist47163 ай бұрын
Great review, the first unbiased one I’ve seen.
@twiglets23 ай бұрын
@anenvironmentalist4716 thank you!
@johnelliott78503 ай бұрын
I've got the game (as of yesterday). I felt your round-up seemed fair, from all I've already seen and heard. Unfortunately, I made the mistake of buying Company Of Heroes 3 some time ago. This is in a different league.
@twiglets23 ай бұрын
@johnelliott7850 Ouch re purchasing company of heroes 3. I hope your experience with men of war 2 is better!
@johnelliott78503 ай бұрын
@@twiglets2 Ha! Ha! Ha! As do I with your experience of COH-3.
@jimmunro46493 ай бұрын
NO UK WW2 England 1939 to 1945 UK was Huge part of WW2 it just plain WANK have no England BIG BYE BYE for ME
@twiglets23 ай бұрын
@jimmunro4649 I was disappointed by that too, I suspect there will be a paid for dlc with commonwealth in the future, a shame it won't be for free!
@Zimurch3 ай бұрын
it does suck, they were fighting for the longest
@kihohoki33823 ай бұрын
Awesome detailed review
@twiglets23 ай бұрын
@kihohoki3382 Thank you!
@Cplusplus7453 ай бұрын
I tried gates of hell and was put off by cumbersome inventory management and stuff, was lookiyfor something like coh but with better looks and a bit more complexity, will it satisfy me im wondering?
@twiglets23 ай бұрын
@Cplusplus745 Men of War 2 still has the inventory management like gates of hell, though I think you can argue the graphics are better. Have you considered CoH3? I think that's the best looking ww2 rts at the moment (since they updated the graphics)
@Cplusplus7453 ай бұрын
@@twiglets2 it's getting some hate so I was thinking of giving it some time
@marinewillis12022 ай бұрын
GOH UI and controls were just too much for me. Excellent idea but I just couldnt get into it
@alfredopotatogaming70333 ай бұрын
my opinion is that the playtest was fun but I would prefer realism mode and the game is currently overpriced.
@marekkos35133 ай бұрын
I was waiting for this video ;] You are the men
@twiglets23 ай бұрын
@marekkos3513 I hope it's what you wanted!
@bleo83713 ай бұрын
I am big fan of these games and i am sad they cant make its way back in to community... back in time we were more SP gamers .. but look 2024! and we have same big maps like in 2000 . . i woud expect them make huge maps with more models detailed cities more destruction and events... look games like RUST open world rendering bases items everything... we game like these cant be super huge maps?.. to enjoy tens of hours of progress.. . make sense look what kind of games you like more? small maps short story or big open maps where you create story?... its what i miss.. anyway if its cheaper i woud buy, but right now i feel hype only, looking if games have hidden progress. . for example will they update new maps? new campains?.. or its just what you buy
@twiglets23 ай бұрын
@bleo8371 I hope they give us an update soon for future plans!
@portman89093 ай бұрын
Looks good tbh. I bought it despite also having gates of hell. I don't mind something more arcade not everything needs to be realistic.
@twiglets23 ай бұрын
@portman8909 exactly, I like your style
@dman19853 ай бұрын
Just sick of half-ass released games anymore, why wait to include an offline mode? That should be the primary mode right?
@twiglets23 ай бұрын
@dman1985 agreed! They said it was something to do with preventing cheating... But I'm not sure
@tariqziad89593 ай бұрын
we just want 64bits mowas2
@twiglets23 ай бұрын
@tariqziad8959 I predict someone will make a ww2 rts in unreal engine 5 soon and it'll make all the others look awful
@thespaceproduction55053 ай бұрын
Why are the lobby sizes so small...?
@twiglets23 ай бұрын
@thespaceproduction5505 huh? I'm not sure I follow?
@thespaceproduction55053 ай бұрын
@@twiglets2 The max PvP lobby sizes are tiny compared to MOWAS2
@luisromero64343 ай бұрын
Is performance better than in GoH? Good video!
@tastybiscuit79223 ай бұрын
lagwise I played 6 game and haven't lagged once even in lobby that I have 200ms. Stutter wise the quality isn't great, I have a 3070 and I experience stutter a few times per game but otherwise I am on 60fps
@twiglets23 ай бұрын
@luisromero6434 I've not lagged particularly but as @tastybiscuit7922 says definitely some stutter. Compared to GoH? Difficult to say but I definitely had trouble with GoH in the past so time will tell whether MoW2 will improve, or is the stuttering baked in
@VMUDream3 ай бұрын
GoH multiplayer is unplayable in comparison to this in my experience
@portman89093 ай бұрын
Gates of hell stutters also.@@tastybiscuit7922
@davidbruce73503 ай бұрын
not as good as gates of hell. i wont be buying
@portman89093 ай бұрын
I really don't understand these hardcore gates of hell fanboys. I like both games in their own way.
@robertmu3 ай бұрын
so.... not worth, buy ostfront instead
@twiglets23 ай бұрын
@robertmu depends on preference really!
@Ben-ek1fz3 ай бұрын
Been looking forward to this❤🎉😂
@twiglets23 ай бұрын
@Ben-ek1fz I hope it's what you wanted!
@Czecher863 ай бұрын
nope its arcade garbage stuck in 2005 graphics..
@alehchyzhyk56033 ай бұрын
Wtf is wrong with vehicles ? From 0 to max instantly, turn instantly, stop instantly. Turrets in guns spin like they are attached to a hyper drive. All tanks are just exploding, almost no possibility to recapture it. Honestly idgaf about various campaign modes if all of them have same crappy physics and unusable UI
@solreaver833 ай бұрын
No commonwealth forces? That's me out. Sick of these games forgetting about us
@twiglets23 ай бұрын
@solreaver83 yes that's a big disappointment!
@chadlaker962Ай бұрын
Yo which would rec for new rts player Men of War 2 or Call to Arm GOH Ostfront both look goodt ? another coool vid btw
@twiglets2Ай бұрын
@@chadlaker962 thanks! Both games are good in my view. Ostfront is more hardcore so it depends if that's what you want. you'll also pick Ostfront up for a good price in the sale as it's a slightly older game, so might be worth going down that route :)
@chadlaker962Ай бұрын
@@twiglets2 ahh thanks for the reply been going back and fourth between the two games
@boruta10343 ай бұрын
One thing I personally don't like is that they went with the 2nd world war once again. Sure, it's an interesting setting but I wish they tried something different. After all in the past we had Men of War: Vietnam that I remember fondly. Why not do a Men of War: Vietnam or Korea? Or a proper Cold War gone hot scenario, not that shitty DLC. They could even try their chances in modern setting. I really mean it, I have Men of War, Men of War: Assault Squad 1 and 2, Gates of Hell, Men of War 2 and they're all set in WW2. Despite its flaws, I really like the fresh and modern setting in Call to Arms and really appreciate the devs for experimenting with the franchise. Aside from the setting, another thing that in my opinion makes successors of Men of War underwhelming is how similar they look and (more or less) play. Some would say it's a good that they're all similar, but after 15 years it's reasonable to expect bigger improvements. Graphics in both GOH and MOW2 are just barely better than in MOWAS 2. Dynamic campaign was a nice experiment but it's too simplistic. Devs of both games should base it on Army General from Steel Division 2, where you have tactical (real time) and strategic (turn-based) mode where in the latter you can freely move units around the map, instead of picking one of two of three points to attack, then waiting for defense and repeat.
@Jambrd3 ай бұрын
just bought it guys wish me luck
@twiglets23 ай бұрын
@Jambrd Good luck! It would be good to hear what you think after you've had a chance to get to know the game
@Jambrd3 ай бұрын
I’ve returned, this game is really fun
@Jambrd3 ай бұрын
@@twiglets2 this game is a masterpiece, it has slight problems which u have mentioned but the game is great, I’m loving it so far and I’m sure others will as well they need to just give it a chance
@twiglets23 ай бұрын
@@Jambrd glad to hear you're enjoying it!
@tastybiscuit79223 ай бұрын
thanks for the fair review, yeah the game isn't the best but most video I see hate the game because it isn't goh and have straight up lies in them. I enjoy it right now but the balance is all over the place
@twiglets23 ай бұрын
@tastybiscuit7922 this game is getting a lot of hate isn't it! I basically had to ignore the balance, glad it wasn't just me
@jacksheldon85663 ай бұрын
I appreciate your neutrality in this review. However it is a shame that when you talked about classic and combined arms, the video just showed tank only battles instead of the respective gamemodes.
@jacksheldon85663 ай бұрын
I didn't knew that fixing a spelling mistake would take out the youtuber's like.
@commandercorl15443 ай бұрын
For some reason, the graphics in MoW2 look worse than the graphics in MoWAS2 to me. MoWAS2 looks grittier, and more realistic, whereas MoW2 is far too cartoony, and their faces look awful.
@twiglets23 ай бұрын
@commandercorl1544 I think the graphics are more modern in MoW2 but I guess the art style (or however you want to describe it) could be more cartoony. I'm a bit disappointed with the character models overall
@commandercorl15443 ай бұрын
@@twiglets2 I think I do agree. Like the overall amount of pixels is better, they look less lie they're from a PS3 game, but yeah, for being a more modern game, the character models are significantly less historically accurate.
@PaulJohn013 ай бұрын
living in a country where the internet fails often ( power also 😂😂) i'll have to wait for an off-line version i think.
@twiglets23 ай бұрын
@PaulJohn01 oh no! Which country do you live in? That sounds like a sensible plan. I hope it's not too far away
@PaulJohn013 ай бұрын
@@twiglets2 Philippines atm, we do have very frequent power outages as well. Actually i have a small gaming channel for the Total War franchise but i want to start a 2nd or 3rd channel covering science fiction, WW2 content so i've been watching your reviews trying too choose games for those channels. You've been a big help so far as i prefer single player games, sadly in 2024 some companies want you to pay for season passes and seem to think they can take back their content even after you've paid for it so choosing games wisely is important.
@twiglets23 ай бұрын
@@PaulJohn01 that's awesome, best of luck with the new channels! I enjoy total war so will check out your videos
@PaulJohn013 ай бұрын
@@twiglets2 Thanks channel name is Iceni Total War, i'll keep checking your channel for reviews, i probably only need 3/4 WW2/Sci Fi games to get me going.
@RUPSIEISMYNAME3 ай бұрын
At 1.35 you made a remark stating that the: tank armor is your hp bar. I have to call you on that. If the type gun has a better penetration then your armor, it will get destroyed. Butttttt If your armor is greater then the penetration of the tank it will never make serious damage to your tank (especially in the older games) resulting in that your crap tanks get blasted away by 75 mm like they are made of paper. But a 37 mm can't touch a king tiger and it only makes funny sounds when the shell hits the tank.
@twiglets23 ай бұрын
@RUPSIEISMYNAME I mean the hull hp rather than the tank as a whole, if that makes sense? I think we agree with each other but I could have phrased it more accurately!
@bumpermanthesecond6153 ай бұрын
My thoughts on this is that the devs are releasing the game to see if the people like their new concept of gameplay or not, because they announced in their discord that the game will be patched regularly.
@alehchyzhyk56033 ай бұрын
They had multiple tests before release. No one liked that arcady mechanics, they still released it
@Metaz3 ай бұрын
Thanks for the review!
@twiglets23 ай бұрын
@Metaz Thanks for watching!
@huantruonginh29463 ай бұрын
Goh rules period
@stormy10553 ай бұрын
have a wrestling match between GOH and MOW 2
@twiglets23 ай бұрын
@stormy1055 haha now that would be an interesting match up!
@twiglets23 ай бұрын
@stormy1055 haha now that would be an interesting match up!
@stormy10553 ай бұрын
@@twiglets2 that's would be a bloody massacre
@Bigerburger2 ай бұрын
ty so much, the reviews were a mess
@twiglets22 ай бұрын
@Bigerburger Thank you!
@randyhughes4303 ай бұрын
Gates of Hell i think i prefer. Can zoom out further for one thing.
@twiglets23 ай бұрын
@randyhughes430 definitely a pet hate of mine not being able to zoom out enough. I'm not sure why some games insist on keeping you zoomed in
@user-wq9mw2xz3j3 ай бұрын
it is for the star wars mod
@twiglets23 ай бұрын
I need to check that out!
@shotgunbadger3 ай бұрын
I tried to get into GoH but the AI was so bad and the micro was so fiddly and annoying it ruined any 'magic' the game had. MoW has the exact right level of that stuff while having an AI that's actually fun to deal with. GoH fans are just insanely insecure and having to make up stuff as if somehow MoW is going to make them vanish or whatever.
@twiglets23 ай бұрын
@shotgunbadger there's a lot of negativity out there, much of which comes from the gates of hell Ostfront players. It would be interesting to see what the overall ratings would be if you could take away their comments / ratings.
@portman89093 ай бұрын
I think it'd get 70% positive reviews without the GoH fans which is pretty good@@twiglets2
@zzirSnipzz13 ай бұрын
If they had maybe gave us British forces something different for a change
@twiglets23 ай бұрын
@zzirSnipzz1 100%, disappointed by the lack of factions
@twiglets23 ай бұрын
@zzirSnipzz1 100%, disappointed by the lack of factions
@backstabingpikeАй бұрын
😂😂😂😂 you know what the problem is is that rts's haven't become Grand strategies. There's no real goal other than spamming units and they do this over and over again and nobody does anything different so you can go back to command and conquer and spam units. Or maybe somebody could make something way better that has a grand strategy included and that you don't have to play. I don't know Nazis. Every time you know you can make a whole technology tree of your own. Do other things. If you're a fan of a certain era, just make a new story😂😂😂😂😂
@twiglets2Ай бұрын
@@backstabingpike yes I agree to an extent. RTSs evolved into something else plain and simple. I personally still love them but can see why many / most have moved on
@jmaccsarmiesofArda3 ай бұрын
They left the Brits out a WW2 game again. Fking hell
@twiglets23 ай бұрын
@jmaccsarmiesodmiddleearth I bet the Brits will be a paid for dlc! A real shame
@jmaccsarmiesofArda3 ай бұрын
@@twiglets2 One of the few countries in the full war but always left out. Does my tits in.
@Zimurch3 ай бұрын
I hate how i have to wait for the Brits on both GOH and MOWII. there such a cool nation to play as and where really important to the war
@jmaccsarmiesofArda3 ай бұрын
@Zimurch literally one of the only factons in the whole war
@matthiasgrunwald8953 ай бұрын
I like it!
@twiglets22 ай бұрын
@mattiasgrunwald895 Glad to hear it!
@twiglets22 ай бұрын
@mattiasgrunwald895 Glad to hear it!
@chasev81392 ай бұрын
why make a fan fav game arcade like.
@twiglets22 ай бұрын
They definitely have tried to tap into the company of heroes market, even though CoH is clearly more arcady than MoW2 you can tell they've gone further in that direction. I guess for money ultimately!
@Ealdorman_of_Mercia3 ай бұрын
The game felt arcadish to me… I also hate the audio, sound design of weapons and tanks is awful, the voice lines are absolutely shit, immersion breaking, units feel and move very arcadish.. I like the concept and content but it just feels like the raninbow siege compared to ready or not.
@twiglets23 ай бұрын
@Ealdorman_of_Mercia I think we can all agree the voice overs are painful to listen to!
@GG211883 ай бұрын
I bought it. Dont think the game warrents all the bad reviews seems like people just hating always online function and lots of gates of hell fanboys. Game seems good so far i do admit they were lazy on the voice acting its bad but passable and the always online was a D move but other than that its good game so far. Will admit i am new to the series i will state because i k kw people are upset coming from the previous games
@twiglets23 ай бұрын
@naru6081 it's interesting to hear the opinion of someone who is new to the series!
@marekkos35133 ай бұрын
its more arcade the Company of heroes ? I dont thinks so
@twiglets23 ай бұрын
@marrekos3513 it's less arcady than company of heroes, but it comes quite close depending on the settings!
@MALOK0033 ай бұрын
if you liked gates of hell, you will hate this game !!
@kloon96993 ай бұрын
So this game actually has good AI?
@MALOK0033 ай бұрын
@@kloon9699 nah worse
@kloon96993 ай бұрын
@@MALOK003 All games in this series are plagued by bad AI. From Soldiers: Heroes of World War II to this latest entry. The only thing that saves Gates of Hell is that it has great visuals and a good atmosphere.
@MALOK0033 ай бұрын
@@kloon9699 no, men of war 2 is much more arcade, it feels that way atleast with the ai troops already fighting at your side and how the ai rush you with tanks and artillery, also firefights between two squads end two qickly in my opinion, there is no room for the same strategies as before. also the cover system and pathing for the troops is some of the worst i have ever encounterd, they can't even walk down a hills many times my troops has to walk all the way back because of poor design. The fact that medics just spawn on the map and takes wounded soldiers to cover just to despawn is also really annoying, same with the mine layers. the battles don't feel real and tactical they just feel like unites clashing like a total war game. the scale is lost, feels like company of heroes with bigger maps. also the visuals and lack of atmosphere doesn't help
@Detrian1593 ай бұрын
@@kloon9699 Much better than GoH.
@briansiebert85233 ай бұрын
After this review, I might look into this game more originally I was not going to do it because it looked too much of the copy and paste has someone who does love men of war steel division and company and heroes. It might be a decent mix for me.
@twiglets23 ай бұрын
@briansiebert8523 it's certainly worth a look! For me the big question is how quickly they will introduce the offline mode. they've made a promise to do that, and I always keep a close eye on how quickly developers keep their promises, to see whether they are worth trusting with their other promises
@briansiebert85233 ай бұрын
@@twiglets2 I think that's going to be the main thing that holds me back from buying it I have heard reports from some of my friends getting server leg in the single player only session.
@twiglets23 ай бұрын
@@briansiebert8523 worth waiting, you might be able to get it on sale too!
@toneymiller591113 күн бұрын
Not worth it ".
@quicksixhatchofficial28803 ай бұрын
Rubbish game
@R3GARnator3 ай бұрын
Aim is in the reach zone!
@user-cc2mi7bw9u3 ай бұрын
they just put out garbage this time...
@dennis-mariusthieme81282 ай бұрын
This is the most shitty Review I ever had. Men of war 2 is already dead. There is no Multiplayer, there is no single player campaign at all. After 15h I lost all of interest. Thew review is totally wrong in everything. I played all Men of War titles, but MoW2 is just shit.
@humaninterface71533 ай бұрын
perfect review .
@twiglets23 ай бұрын
@humaninterface7153 Thank you!
@marekkos35133 ай бұрын
As much I like gates of hell , I think Men of war 2 is more fun to play.
@buckcherry25643 ай бұрын
GoH has a much nice menu and UI (imagine high-rez icons...novel!) but MoW2 just feels better for my AS2 nostalgia itch.
@portman89093 ай бұрын
MoW2 is more of a successor to MoW than MoW AS.@@buckcherry2564
@Updog1153 ай бұрын
I think the American dialogue is fucking cringe and corny
@twiglets23 ай бұрын
@Updog115 Same!
@TheRingoism3 ай бұрын
It's weird that all the smaller KZbinr reviews of this game aren't giving it the bashing it deserves and so many of these comments seem to like the game, don't you lot have standards, Men of War 2 is clearly a piece of shit, why would anyone prefer or play this over GoH or MOWAS 2
@twiglets23 ай бұрын
@TheRingoism Ouch
@portman89093 ай бұрын
It's almost like people have different opinions on what makes a good game?
@TheRingoism3 ай бұрын
@@portman8909 Tell me what makes this a good game and compare It to Gates of Hell too since they pretty much play on the same engine and mostly have the same audience bar some newcomers who're more casual, Men of War has never been casual, this Isn't Company of Heroes or World of Tanks, Why do you think Men of War Arena failed and this game will fail too because It's pretty much Arena with strings attached, but please go on and tell why you think this a good game?