Is the A350 or A330neo better for Airlines?

[@ThomasNovLoh]

For long haul, airlines should order A350. For medium haul, airlines should order A330neo. For short haul, airlines should order A320neo.

[@DjsAviation]

Good idea!!

[@TheItsmegp46]

ThomasNovLoh Curiously, Hawaii Airlines uses the a330 from Nyc to Honolulu Hi non stop. A sizable long haul.

[@tibianus123]

a321*

[@Alex-ve3it]

Airbus > Boeing

[@oida10000]

@@tibianus123 or a319*

[@paulpetersen3764]

As a passenger, it's the A330NEO hands down...the 2-4-2 cabin configuration is much more friendly than the 3-3-3 of the A350.

[@the_alex_ellis_channel6923]

The A350 is quite possibly the most beautiful aircraft I have ever seen....

[@DjsAviation]

It's a stunner!

[@the_alex_ellis_channel6923]

Air New Zealand are currently deciding whether to buy the A350 or the B777X - fingers crossed for the A350.

[@salemsuljkanovic2067]

Concorde...

[@thetravelbubble6154]

Fran Gipane pfff, no the a350 wings are wayyy better!

[@thetravelbubble6154]

It's Me it’s out of service you dim wit! It’s interior is also lacking heavily in comparison to the aircrafts now, as well as fuel consumption, comfort and noise. Although I would of loved to gone on a Concorde at supersonic speed. Wish they were still here😕

[@FluppiLP]

the video isn't bad however I would recommend you use some graphics to support the things you say. Footage is nice but having footage throughout the video is just not necessary. But having a neat little table helping to visualize the things you say would be great. For example listing prices and range, advantages and disadvantages of each plane. Because all I hear is numbers which makes it hard to follow the pros and cons of each aircraft. The difference between A350 and A330 is one number and once I get to the point where you name the price or range of the A330 I've already forgotten the range of the A350 or the price. It's just too much to handle if I don't want to spend the time of watching this video serveral times. Just as a hint for the future :)

[@DjsAviation]

Thanks for the help :) I really didn’t mean for this video to be like that and quickly realise once I listened to it again just how number based it was :) since this video I have made an effort to make it less numbery and give you more time to digest the information :-) hope you have an excellent day!

[@stephen_101]

A330 Neo + A350 could easily operate side by side. Many airlines operate 767 + 777s, and A330s + 777s. With the A350 being a good 777 replacement, Airbus would do airlines a good combo deal to keep them away from the 787 camp. Great video, keep up the good work.

[@DjsAviation]

Indeed it could! Thanks for watching :)

[@planeup__3049]

Airlines should make a 787 & A350 combo which are both best in class with superior efficiency and comfort to other aircraft, A350 is a good replacement for 777 family and 787 is a good one for the A330 family.

[@petermelia3384]

I think that the A330neo is more of a Middle of the Market sort of plane. That operates low demand long haul flights or short haul flights with high demand. The A350 is more of a Traditional long haul plane that has a long range and can carry a high number of passengers.

[@DjsAviation]

Middle market is a perfect way to describe it! Thanks for watching

[@thebravegallade731]

Meanwhile 320neo goes for short haul?

[@Ibirdball]

I think you hit the nail right on the head, it depends. The A330neo will fill the role of the 767-300ER, mid-range, 250-300 passenger routes, such as Middle East to Asia and trans-Atlantic routes. The A350 is for more long range, >300 passenger routes, such as trans-Pacific and Europe to Asia.

[@DjsAviation]

Thank you so much man! It really depends on the routes airliners are looking at operating.

[@bringmethemilkmother3798]

Ibirdball the Middle East is in asia

[@Ibirdball]

When I say Asia I mean more like China, Japan, India, Philippines, Indonesia, etc.

[@jrcolmena]

when you say asia, you mean east asia

[@ERZAJOP]

Air Senegal purchased 2 A330-NEO.900 to start its mid range haul.. After reading the comments here, i rest assured we did a great bargain considering our country is the western most part of Africa on the Atlantic ocean, 6hr from Europe, 6hr from America and around 7hr from Asia...Air Senegal is the 2nd customer for the AIRBUS' newest bird after TAP Portugal, and the 1st and only in all Africa so far to operate the NEO... We purchased 2 new ATRs, prior to this, for the regional and domestic market , and counting. Things are getting better around here, and by the way, Senegal is also the launch customer worldwide for the newest military jet trainer of tcheque's WODOOCHY, with 4 new L39NG for our millitary pilot training school...Wish us good luck.!!

[@Eyob797]

The A350 is a very comfortable and great airplane. I would not be surprised if more airlines around the world orders many A350s.

[@DullesPlaneSpotter]

I love how fast your channel is growing! I had not known that the A350-800 had been cancelled.

[@DjsAviation]

Thanks mate! It sure has been. I guess it was so the A330neo could flourish.

[@btarunr]

A330-900neo for domestic and small/mid range routes (up to 9 hours flying time) with no real competitor from Boeing; and A350-900 for long-haul (8-14 hours flying time), competes with B787-10. A330-800neo for "slim and long" routes (8-14 hours) with 250-ish pax, and a competitor to B787-8. A350-1000 is a B777-300ER competitor, and intended to replace A340-600 fleets. This makes the B787-9 a truly peerless plane. It has the capacity of an A330-900neo, but with the range of an A350-900, while being priced in-between them.

[@DjsAviation]

Absolutely spot on!

[@junioraspirin6324]

The Boeing 787-9 does not have the range of the 350. It flies maximum of 14 100ish km and even at that will have limitations of payload whereas the 350 can go 15 000 up to 17600 km with full load. Still a very efficient and marvellous aircraft tho!

[@80sfreak14]

Both are good but idk.......A350 looks more modern.

[@DjsAviation]

Thanks man, I think they both look good :)

[@80sfreak14]

I really like the nose of the A350, reminds me of a hawk. But the A330 nose is so similar to the A300, I can't decide, depends on the airlines business.

[@adamp.3739]

It's like comparing SpaceX's Falcon rocket family to the Antares family. You know which one is the more modern one.

[@echt114]

It does look more fit and less fat.

[@a.b.2897]

This is the first video I've seen by you and I'm not dissapointed. Keep up the great content!

[@DjsAviation]

Thanks man!

[@Alex-ve3it]

Airbus ≥ Boeing Depends on the model but mostly it’s an Airbus win.

[@gamecop1317]

At first kudos to you for making an such an interesting video! I think both variants are very different between each other, the A350-900 and -1000 are intended (especially the latter one) to compete against the very successful B777-300ER and the 777-200ER. As well as an replacement for all A340-600's, whilst the A330Neo is the in house replacement for their A330's and A340-300's as well as a direct competitor to the 787-8. In the end airlines tend to order aircrafts that suits their current fleet and I think both variants a very interesting for future orders from various carriers.

[@DjsAviation]

Thank you my friend! I think they all complement each other and serve their purposes well. With them being both very different to be honest.

[@thomas9374]

I belive the A350 is the more advanced plane, it is a good option for Longhaul and Ultralonghaul routes which are operated by flag ship carriers. I belive if you also have A330ceo in your fleet is an option, but the A330 neo is more suitable fore domestic short long haul routes or even medium haul on high demand routes in Asia.

[@DjsAviation]

Its fantastic! I think it really varies on the routes as the A330neo is more targeted at shorter routes.

[@doctorderpyduck5778]

I work for Lufthansa which highly sponsors the a319neo a320neo a321neo and Lufthansa loves the a330's and a340's the neo will be awesome for them :3

[@DjsAviation]

That's so cool! The A330neo is a great aircraft!

[@aviationloverexpert7435]

Rydz West How come Lufthansa don't order Boeing planes anymore? Have they become biased towards Airbus (a similar thing with United Airlines only most ordering Boeing)?

[@ChuksSpotting]

An impressive episode mate! Love both Aircrafts. I agree that the airlines will ultimately make a decision based on their needs.

[@DjsAviation]

Thanks so much!

[@akhilmaganti3533]

Nj man! Love the vid and the rate at which you have reached from 8k to 29k is amazing it took only ~2 months! Keep it up

[@anupeace73]

Nice one. First time in the channel and like it. Just one note, please also include some text on the video, specially when talk about numbers. Keep it up.

[@DjsAviation]

Thanks a lot :) I realized after recording their was far too many numbers haha. None of my other videos will be like that :-) Thanks though!

[@QFSAviation]

Awesome video. It's kind of confusing to discuss this topic, and you did a great job. I think the 330neo looks cooler, but the 350-9 is more economic

[@DjsAviation]

Thanks mate, was confusing to put together!

[@speedbird1598]

The A330 NEO however is far more optimized to short/medium haul routes as well...

[@aviationloverexpert7435]

Speedbird Shorter wings are better for shorter so 787 could actually better for shorter routes despite being optimised for range comparable to a350-900

[@nntflow7058]

On Shorter routes, around 3000-4000nm. A330-900neo would perform better in terms of fuel efficiency. Using A350-900/-1000 on 3000-4000nm routes wouldn't be that economical. It's mainly the wings design and the empty weight of the A350 that made it "a horrible" choice for shorter flights. Sames goes for B787-8/-9. Hence why many airlines still bought A330-300 or A330-900neo even though B787-8/-9 is around. On extremely short regional flights bellow 3000nm, B787-9 would actually be way worse compared to A330-300. Yes, the old A330-300 is better at shorter routes compared to the new B787-9.

[@TrainsWow]

Awesome video! I could see the a330 neo pick up with some smaller airlines that serve long distant routes, like Edelweiss, Level, Air Transat, etc. that are looking for newer aircraft.

[@DjsAviation]

Thanks so much! Indeed those airlines would fit it perfectly!

[@zrhaviation5574]

Interesting video mate!

[@anuaviation3510]

Honestly the a330neo is going to come in and sell more than the a350

[@DjsAviation]

Maybe!

[@danchan5741]

JJW AntiguaAviation Hard to say, the 350 is pretty cool.

[@tpgskyfaris]

airasia just ordered 100 a330neo worth of 30 billions dollar

[@justinray8255]

The A330 has already made it's name. The A350 is so quiet and smooth but for some reason I feel more comfortable on an A330

[@adamp.3739]

My advice to Airbus: Never blow money on a brand-new aircraft that has more or less the same purpose as other, existing aircraft. Just reengine them. Result? Profit!

[@pasoundman]

No joke here but in truth the answer is BOTH depending on the route. To understand why you have to look at the history of the A350's development and several other factors, namely ETOPS, advanced engine developments, the issue over hub/spoke operation and direct point to point flights and the increasing use of (lighter) composite materials in airframes. Firstly, ETOPS is now so well advanced that SOME twin engined aircraft can fly for up to 6 hours under ETOPS i.e. over water before needing a diversion airport for emergencies.That means that MOST routes can be flown ETOPS. Secondly, modern engines may be around 15% more fuel efficient than their predecessors due to a number of technical advances. Thirdly the change in operations to increased point to point direct flights increases the need for medium high capacity long haul aircraft. Lastly, it needs a new plane design to make best use of composites. Long ago, Airbus were approached with an interest in a new aircraft of A330 class with enhanced range. They initially offered a new A330 version but it wasn't widely liked. Eventually they were persuaded to make the A350, a totally new aircraft. Designed for long haul with medium to largish capacity it looks to be a winner. Airbus didn't forget the A330 though and, borrowing some 5% of parts designed for both the A380 and A350, plus more efficient engines they were able to create the A330neo at a bargain price, about 25% less than the 'equivalent' A350 but with more limited range. So the A330neo will attract medium haul operators and the A350XWB, longer haul operators. Take your pick. Airbus really pulled a rabbit out of the hat here. Together with their now majority interest in the Bombardier C-series programme, they have a really attractive product line. Now consider the remaining quad jets that are selling slowly, the A380 and the B747-8.

[@nielskastbjerg4117]

Nice video dude :) i have searched for a aviation Channel in Long time. U are doing an amizing job bro. Keep Up the good Work :D

[@DjsAviation]

Thanks, bro! Really appreciate it!

[@3storiesUp]

You can talk about the 350 being the less expensive aircraft to run .. but the unit cost of the 330 neo mitigates any saving I would think. With aggressive pricing the 330neo could be a huge seller.

[@RobisAviation]

Great video! Video suggestion: why did the Airbus A318 fail and what happened! Cheers -Robi

[@idawan09]

Random Robi maybe too small and not fits economic of scale

[@DjsAviation]

Thank you so much! I think Nice guy is spot on!

[@duk2k]

Wonderful content!

[@davidhunt3808]

I See the A350 come in to Brisbane everyday and it is a very good looking aircraft !

[@RVNspotting]

Loving this series! I think the A330-900neo is a great alternative basically for all current A330 operators that don't need the A359's range and capacity. The future of the A330-800neo doesn’t look as bright though. It is too much airplane for transatlantic ops and many airlines that need a range similar to -800neo's have already ordered 787s & A350s.

[@decapitanfluffy9634]

The reason why Airlines you said "stay loyal" is not because they love the airplane. It is actually a logical choice to make. It decreases the cost of training pilots as well as employees with working a certain type of plane. It also decreases the human error as well as time. Time is money after all. For example A330, it would be a logical choice to opt for the A350 or A330neo. Since it will replace the current existing routes of the old A330(what im saying is range will not be a problem). As well as capacity isn't a problem, plus the A350 they say has "airbus commonality" in the cockpit so it is easy to learn. There will always be empty seats and it won't be guaranteed for an Airplane to fill up all the time.(Hence this is why they schedule the flights cautiously, for example the frequent amount of flights per week(talking about roundtrips as well.) It is to ensure that the plane isn't losing money(saves fuel costs). When they say that a plane that isn't flying is losing money, thats not true since you have to consider the fact about how many passengers as well as fuel and maintenance costs. It also decreases the wear rate of the plane(saving maintenance costs. However this isn't always the case)

[@alexismorrison8366]

I think some airlines like Qatar, Etihad would go for both A330neo and A350XWB but airlines like qantas would use A330neo and airlines like malaysia airlines would use A350XWB But like you said it all comes down to what the airline wants and what routes there going to use it on, and if need cheaper or better planes

[@DjsAviation]

Qatar has the A350 and Etihad the 787 so I’m really not too sure if they will go for the a330neo

[@MrAlwaysright77]

Great comment, as always good insights, thank you very much.

[@Idzbzejxjdhrcjjxh]

I like A350 but A330neo is the best one

[@DjsAviation]

Fair enough buddy!

[@bijaysitaula7006]

A350 is made to compete B787. Where A330 neo is made to Advanced the technology of A330. Although 787 have more range than A330neo but can fly more than A330.It can fly distance easily like from Doha to New York. I like both.

[@VTGGT]

This is the actual difference between A330 vs A350. Domestic routes(low to mid range) vs Long haul(mid to high range) routes. not-apparently-not-domestic. If you put a A330 do long haul it will probably burn more fuel per seat than a A350 and vise versa.

[@jrwxtx]

DJ: Thanks for the update! Did not realize the A330neo was so much cheaper.

[@DjsAviation]

Thanks man it's a pleasure! It is quite a fair bit cheaper.

[@jrwxtx]

One other ?: Are the winglets on the A330neo the same as A350? It appears that they have that curvature of the A350 winglet, but I can't tell if they are exactly the same. It is easy to see the difference from the old A330 winglets.

[@toucego]

TAP Air Portugal, the launch customer of the A330neo had orders for the A350 that they swapped for the A330neo. As you mention in the video TAP Air Portugal already has a big fleet of A330 therefore they went for continuity.

[@danchan5741]

Great video, I learned some new things. I haven't heard of this new Airbus a330, it looks awesome, they did try and make it look like the a350, which is a magnificent aircraft, and one of my favourite.

[@DjsAviation]

Cheers Dan! Greatly appreciated!

[@danchan5741]

Dj's Aviation Sure thing buddy.

[@briancoughlin5027]

I am a big fan of the A 350 900 I think it could fill a lot of niches for capacity,distance,economy, and speed,I really looking forward to the new 777 then let’s see who wins this war?

[@DjsAviation]

Indeed, I love the new 777x, hoping QF order that!

[@BayAreaLen]

Congrats on the quick growth of your channel. People love aviation and you've presented it very well. That said, I'm a Boeing fan, and while I do like all aircraft, I would most certainly (for my non-existent, hypothetical airline) Have a fleet of 789's and (upcoming) 778's for my ultra long haul routes and 7810's and 779's on my medium and long haul routes. I especially dislike the A350 and think that it is little more than a marketing gimmick to call it XWB (Extra Wide Body.) I would take a current generation 77W instead, which is the true wider body, and still with enough range to cover more than 90% of long haul routes that exist today. I'd also be concerned with now all new Airbus wide body aircraft to only have RR as an engine choice. Great video, friend!

[@DjsAviation]

Thank you so very much for the kind words! I think the airlines also base their decisions greatly off what their current fleet is if that makes sense. Thank you once again my friend!

[@aviationloverexpert7435]

BayAreaLen Classic I agree about Rolls Royce. They over advertise for nothing. All their engines have the ancient core of the RB 211, they often have in flight shutdowns and aren't as efficient as GE engines despite their marketing claims.

[@AdAndPlanes]

I think the A350 is the best for long haul flights out of the 2 A350s. Great facts and points for both of the aircraft. I think that the A330Neo is a great Aircraft, and both pose as a major addition to Aviation. I’ll keep it quick. Great video, keep it up!

[@DjsAviation]

I agree! However, the a330 is a fantastic option for domestic flights that might require a larger capacity :) thanks for watching again!!

[@jahurz93]

330neo is usefull for patching up those needed extra payload and deployment 10 hour missions which Is what low cost airlines are looking for and still has a lower operating cost advantage than the a350 and it's commonality to current a330 operators. The a350 is usefull if you have yielding passengers and you really need to deploy them on premiun routes without needing to fill up the plane like an a380 and the cabin is more spacious than the a330 as well. More relax to deploy them on long haul.

[@EthansAviationYYC]

I have never really been an airbus fan but I am leaning towards the A330neo

[@DjsAviation]

It's a beautiful aircraft!

[@jonnairn942]

Great Vid again mate, personally i think the A330 Neo is the one for the Aussie market domestically.

[@DjsAviation]

Thanks mate, I tend to agree.

[@immanuelj8952]

Omg killing it with vids 2day

[@DjsAviation]

Thanks dude! Hope you’re enjoying the content :-)

[@immanuelj8952]

Dj's Aviation it’s great content thanks for putting your time into these it really shows

[@DjsAviation]

Most welcome :)

[@horseplop9]

Immanuel J The A350 wins

[@immanuelj8952]

Uncle Chuckles ?

[@therealpetergriffinyoutube2736]

If they did the a350-800 they would be almost completely ripping off Boeing 787-8 ,9 and 10 A350-800, 900 and 1000

[@DjsAviation]

They’d also risk losing out on the a330neo which was the main reason the A350-800 was dropped :)

[@ASJEAviationHQ]

Tough question... out of these two, I'm leaning towards the A350, but otherwise... I have no comment. =P

[@DjsAviation]

I think it greatly depends on the airline but I love the 350!

[@ASJEAviationHQ]

I'm unsure because I've always been more of a Boeing person, so choosing out of two Airbus aircraft is a hard choice to make. =P

[@danchan5741]

ASJE Aviation HQ I like Boeing too :) But not more or less than Airbus :)

[@noashapps6390]

A larger version of the 737, both with bigger capacity and range, whilst still being smaller than thr 787, with the same range or bigger rangewould be amazing. Smaller capacity than the 787, but same or longer range.

[@DjsAviation]

I think that's going to be the 797 :)

[@noashapps6390]

Side stick's are one of my favourite things about certain aircraft.

[@StarAllianceMan]

Quality video, enjoyed very much!

[@DjsAviation]

Thanks mate!!

[@huynguyen4456]

I think both of them

[@DjsAviation]

Probably depends greatly on what the airline likes and needs :) as in qantas may want the a330neo for domestic routes within Australia and then the A350 for flights throughout Asia etc.

[@huynguyen4456]

Dj's Aviation Wow, cool. I hope they will have a330 daily domestic route to Adelaide

[@skyng380]

Cathay Pacific ordering a350 is the right choice. Cathay Dragon should probably order a330neo for replacing their old a330s.

[@DjsAviation]

I think you are spot on! The Cathay Dragon airline would suit the A330neo's over the A350's in my eyes.

[@ulysseslee9541]

no, CX will swap their A330 ceo to KA 1st

[@justinray8255]

I love them both. But for some reason the a330 is my favourite I've been on both and they're both incredible

[@erikc1775]

Its the same story as it was when both the Boeing 767-300ER and the Boeing 777 was in production at the same time. Even though they operate in what looks like the same market segment (long haul 250+ seats) they are in fact different. The 777 is better at flying those really long haul flights while the 767 is better at doing jumps across the pond (Atlantic Ocean). Yes it has the capacity to fly longer than that, but its not as good for that as the 777. Same goes for the new A330Neo. I think it will be better at doing flight across the Atlantic and the airlines doing charter like Thomas Cook or the Tui group will sure love it too. But doing really long distance flights? No, the A350 is better for that I think. Airlines will probably have a totally different view of it all, but thats my thoughts anyway...

[@Jimsz4392]

This is like a class presentation

[@DjsAviation]

Thank you so much!

[@locoHAWAIIANkane]

Well, Hawaiian’s order of the 330neo is recently up to question being the viable option for them. They’re now wanting to expand to Europe from HNL and OGG so if they wanted to go with that option, the 350 would be the proper choice.

[@thesamshk]

The a330 neo will maybe even kill the a350 program in my opinion. Firstly many airlines already fly the classic a330, which makes them loyal to the a330 family. Secondly the a350 program is new and untested, thus making a few airlines probably sceptical, where as the a330neo is the more advanced remake of the good ol' plane they've been already flying for many years.

[@DjsAviation]

Maybe! The A350 is still going strong. Maybe airlines will order both like Delta

[@Racko.]

Both planes were made for different purposes. A330neo came out a bit too late (made to compete with the Dreamliner) and the Dreamliner is by far ahead. But a330 is a med-long haul plane while the a350 a long haul flight aircraft. Same with the 777 which is a super twin jet made for extremely long haul flights. So the a330 will make profit for airlines that want them. Same with The a350. Gr8 vid!

[@DjsAviation]

Indeed! This was asked by 6 people on a previous video which was why I made it btw :)

[@Racko.]

Dj's Aviation cool 👍

[@yousrichaachoua9814]

Would love to see one of these 2 in service with my country’s airlines in the future

[@rajnirvan3336]

I think both planes look nice. I've been on A330-300 but not A350 yet

[@SlavaUkraini85]

another great video! thank you! could you maybe do at some point a video about the situation and future of MoM aircraft?

[@DjsAviation]

Thanks man, what do you mean by MoM aircraft. Sorry!

[@SlavaUkraini85]

Dj's Aviation MoM= Middle of the market :-) like B757 and its future, Potential B797 and so on... could be very interesting. Btw: any tipps for a first time visitor of Australia: going for 7 weeks beginning of March :-)

[@DjsAviation]

Ah okay mate :) I did a video on the 797 and am looking at doing a 757 one soon :) Where are you visiting in Australia specifically? :)

[@SlavaUkraini85]

Dj's Aviation cool thx! Spending a few days in MEL first and then to Cairns and all the way south with the motorhome. So excited to visit this huge country!

[@abdullabintalib4118]

.!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Your editing and perhaps "cinematography" is Oscar-worthy

[@khumoaviator4060]

A330neo is a good fit but if an airline would want an all airbus long haul in terms of capacity I would choose A350-900 with 1000 and A330-800 if you please or just A330-900 with A350-1000 to make capacity sense.

[@DjsAviation]

Long haul suits the A350 more as you mentioned etc with maybe an A330-900 for more shorter routes that are popular.

[@suzukigixxer1627]

#Dj's_aviation Hey man you forgot Ethiopian airlines also own A350-900.Btw,keep on coming with good contents and hopefully you'll have much more subscribers and views.Peace from Nepal🇳🇵🇦🇺

[@DjsAviation]

Hey mate, I know Ethiopian have the A350 but I wasn't going to mention every carrier that had it xD Thanks a lot!

[@NorgesSpottingchannel]

Maybe the A330Neo is coming out a little bit to late! I guess the A330 Neo is interesting for low cost airlines. And for services where a long range isn't required. Could turn out very well for TAP on flights to North and South America!

[@DjsAviation]

Quite possibly it is. Thanks for watching!

[@nntflow7058]

The main reason why A330neo comes up late is because the older A330-300 is actually extremely fuel efficient and airlines keep ordering it even in 2017, the big order are consistent, in 2017 they have 49 order for the -300 alone. On shorter routes, A330-300 is actually more fuel efficient compared to B787-9. A330neo is only there because airlines suddenly have the change of heart about A330-300. Most operators of A330ceo or A330neo is Full service airlines btw.

[@aviationloverexpert7435]

NNT Flow I thoughy that shorter wings are better for shorter routes (the a330neo has bigger wings than 787). Last year the 777 made a comeback after only 17 orders were received as demand for wide bodies was slowing. The 787-10 according to Boeing is nearly 30% more efficient than a330-300 and claims 10% better than the a350-900. While the a350-900 has the longer range it's big wing is better suited for long haul while competitor 787-10 os more efficient on 6000 to 6500nmi routes (it's range)

[@ernestosalinas8231]

Personally, the A-330 NEO looks like a very good option for any Airline.

[@davidtjahjadi5079]

The a330 neo will be competing with the 787... And to be precised it will be competing with 787-10. They almost have the same range, but the 787-10 can hold much more passengers. So again those airlines that require more capacity will go for 787-10, airlines that don't need the high capacity will go for the neo. Airbus fuselage/ underside belly is so huge that they protrude tremendously, even the 777-300er's are not that huge...

[@DjsAviation]

I wouldn't have thought the 787-10 but that's certainly an interesting comparison for sure.

[@bluemusicnwn4828]

I like the A330neo, it looks better than the a350. On my opinion.

[@DjsAviation]

Fair enough! I think both look quite similar to be honest with the a330 being more bulky :-)

[@tatianaschipani3384]

I like a350

[@danielclay2503]

Nice huge like

[@DjsAviation]

Thanks bro!!

[@boeingcat5077]

I like the A330-800NEO

[@DjsAviation]

I don't blame you :)

[@UbuhEats]

Im on holiday can't get my daily dose of DJ xD

[@UbuhEats]

Thats why im not commenting btw congrats on 8k

[@hkflightreviews5484]

Both aircrafts looks quite similar , I'm not sure which one is better 🤔

[@DjsAviation]

I think both serve their purpose fantastically!

[@ThomasNovLoh]

It depends on the range. For long haul flights, A350 is better.

[@EdgyNumber1]

Still none the wiser, although A350 may have potential for a larger three class variants on some routes, a 1100 model if you will.

[@DjsAviation]

They have talked about a -1100 aircraft :)

[@hervechrissindayigaya5159]

had to watch the video 4 times to understand numbers! can you use graphics when u are talking in number, for the rest, it's an awesome video! really enjoyed it.......good job bro! A330 looks beautiful than the A350! but i always have an issue with airbus aircraft, except the A330,on the design of their Nose gear placement! they look misplaced and wired to me!

[@brandonfu9308]

What's with the black paint around the cockpit windows!! It looks nice on the A350 but not on the A330neo. Great video!!

[@DjsAviation]

Maybe it's to try and make the aircraft look even more futuristic. who knows? Thanks for watching!

[@jlust6660]

There's some explanation about this with material expanding en contracting due to temperature differences... Their main function however is making airbusses look more 'airbussy'

[@adamp.3739]

What is it!? The new fad with aircraft - painting cockpit window frames black just to look more attractive!?

[@nicolas555539]

Hey Dj! I just want to know what your opinion on the Boeing 727's that are still in service are. :D Do you agree with a number of 727's being charter aircraft or do you think they should all be retired?

[@DjsAviation]

Hey man! I would love for them to remain personally as charter aircraft as they look superb! Unfortunately, I've never seen one before so If I could see one before they retire I'd be very happy :) What are your thoughts?

[@idawan09]

The last one used by donald trump

[@nicolas555539]

I think the ones that are still around will stick for quite a long time. In North America there are still a number of 727's that are used for private flights, mostly from commercial operators retiring the specific 727-100's from their fleets in the early 90s. As you can imagine now, 722's have also mostly been retired and picked up for private use. Also, a notable example of a 727 that visits my area from time to time is a modified 727-200F that is used for people to experience zero gravity environments. I didn't mention any cargo carriers since that'd be a given, I think. But overall I don't think the 727 will go extinct anytime soon :)

[@deangreen3370]

i like the A350 better

[@DjsAviation]

Fair enough!

[@mystixo.]

A350, I chose because, it can go on long or short distances, but the problem, it will have less flight routes.

[@zacharynascimento3921]

Delta now has the a350-900 in service and United has the a350 on order, expected to be delivered in 2022-2027

[@hedemalmcarl]

Here comes Thai again! MY FAVOURITE AIRLINE

[@DjsAviation]

Yaya!

[@delmonte4824]

Their cabins are somehow cheesy or corny with that color.its reminds me of a cake with artificial food coloring.

[@Benni3]

A350-1000 has more powerful engines that the -900 but 787-9 and -10 have same engines.

[@DjsAviation]

That's awesome!

[@aviationloverexpert7435]

Ben Godenrath The engines actually have better power on the 787-10 over the -9. Otherwise Emirates wouldn't have ordered it because Tim Clarke believed it could not meet MTOW with the thrust of the -9.

[@LacoteCohen]

I love both!

[@mellymarich8822]

A350 is better

[@DjsAviation]

The A350 is a stunning aircraft!

[@ThomasNovLoh]

As for medium haul routes, A330neo is more suitable.

[@mellymarich8822]

ThomasNovLoh True but for the long haul routes like SIN-CGD the A350 would be better

[@danchan5741]

Food and Travel I kinda though the old a330 would be as much good for long haul as the 350, and that this new 330 would be even more. This is news to me :)

[@glorious_help]

Food and Travel for whom?! You do realize they are for different uses, do you?

[@jonnairn942]

Or perhaps the Bombardier C300 for the Aussie domestic market, i hear its a wonderful plane, just ask Air Baltic, they love it!

[@DjsAviation]

I'd love that to be honest!

[@Sacto1654]

Actually, the A350XWB-900 serves this purpose: as a replacement for the 777-200ER's that were built in between 1997 and 2003. Indeed, that's what Singapore Airlines is doing right now. Lufthansa is buying the A350XWB-900 to replace the A340-300 and A340-600 fleets on many long routes.

[@DjsAviation]

I never intended to say it didn't serve a purpose :-) Lufthansa have done well by getting the A350 in my eyes

[@Sacto1654]

Lufthansa needed to get the A350XWB-900 because their A340-300 fleet--the largest of any airline--was rapidly aging and needed a replacement.

[@jetlinerspottingsgn4407]

In my country, the national aviation - Vietnam Airlines has 10 Airbus A350-900 XWB aircrafts and 11 Boeing 787-9 Dreamliner aircrafts.

[@jlust6660]

Seems kinda contradictory to make a330-200's fly domestic, they have a bigger range than the -300. As far as I know, most -200 operators use them more on international routes than domestic. If airlines want fuelefficient airplanes in with that range, the a350 seems a better option. Even though they are more expensive, they seem like a better long-term investment.

[@wwommy]

nice video hope to see more

[@DjsAviation]

Thank you :) you sure will! Just posted a new video some 50 mins ago on the 777x

[@wwommy]

cool! i'd love if you kept releasing videos all the time but maybe itll be better for your channel if you made a schedule to release a vid every few days? that way we (your subscribers) would have a cool video of yours to watch every few days and also you'll always have one ready to release. get what im saying? that's my advice to you! nice videos and goodluck with your channel. i'll keep watching!

[@turbotroll8605]

Like every aircraft, it depends how you plan to use them. Many of the big airlines will use both but on different routes

[@airplaneengine1900]

i really liked their A310. it was a beautiful plane with big fuselage

[@ronparrish6666]

310 300 330 same width 350 is one seat wider

[@gooner72]

I absolutely adore the A350 so I'd have one all day long...... as long as you were buying DJ.

[@SLiewaviation]

AirAsia X ordered both aircraft but they changed some A350 orders to A330neo just because the A330neo is cheaper

[@mattniedbala5839]

whats the difference tbh ? they could be both used for long haul flights.

[@gunthertoastbrot3738]

I think, the A330 is ideal on medium haul to short long haul high demand routes, like coast to coast in the US or Tokyo to Singapore!

[@superbigwhiteshark01]

Good comparisons but you should have put some tables with figures to be more "visually visible"

[@Eyob797]

You forgot Ethiopian AIrlines. It operates A350-900s about five of them right now, the number may grow to 25 aircrafts in the coming few years.

[@ahsanhadi4327]

A350 is much larger and much expensive. A 330 neo is affordable and has as much capacity as most of the airlines has at any route.

[@dhruvsaxena5203]

Why will airlines buy A350 because a380 price is just 98 million above a350 1000

[@blumac9801]

Personally I think the A350 looks better, that’s my favorite plane right there, but I like the A330 too Looks exactly like a 767 tho :/