It's MAVERICK Time: Ford's Tiniest Truck Takes On The World's TOUGHEST Towing Test!

Get 20% OFF + Free Shipping @manscaped with promo code FASTLANETRUCK at www.manscaped.com!
( tfl-studios.com/ ) Check out our new spot to find ALL our content, from news to videos and our podcasts! Nathan and Andre take an all-new 2022 Ford Maverick On The World's TOUGHEST Towing Test - the Ike Gauntlet!
( / tflcar ) Visit our Patreon page to support the TFL team!
Watch more videos from TFL Studios:
The Fast Lane Truck ( / tfltruck )
The Fast Lane Car ( / tflcar )
TFLoffroad ( / tfloffroad )
TFLbike ( / @tflbike )
TFLnow ( / tflnow )
TFLclassics ( / tflclassics )
TFLtalk ( / tfltalk )
TFL Podcasts:
TFL Talkin' Cars Podcast ( tflcar.libsyn.com/ )
TFL Talkin' Trucks Podcast ( tfltruck.libsyn.com/ )
00:00 Intro
00:29 Downhill
2:40 The Trailer
2:55 Powertrain
3:35 Downhill
8:58 Uphill
10:35 Bed & Features
11:53 Uphill
14:25 Ike Score & Verdict
#Ford #Maverick #IkeGauntlet

[@JohnMiller-zn9pf]

I've said it before. THIS is what people wanted and expected when the current Ranger came to market.

[@northernairmtb4183]

The current ranger is pretty cool though

[@ghostlegit]

The ranger is better tho.

[@teslaedison6236]

@@ghostlegit Better how??

[@yamajammer76]

So instead of just making one small Ranger they offer a small Maverick and a mid-sized Ranger. How is 1 better then 2?

[@ghostlegit]

@@teslaedison6236 more horsepower more room better towing better features. The ranger is the pickup every American wants.

[@creigmacc]

Ford's biggest issue will be building enough to meet demand. Gotta say they are on a serious roll with their recent new products.

[@davidstephens8871]

I agree, they will sell a billion of these for sure.

[@Anthony-sn6vz]

@@davidstephens8871 and that they're making it in Mexico

[@codyhall7263]

@@Anthony-sn6vz sucks man but it’s probably why they can sell it so cheap. .i work at ford in Avon Lake Oh and they sent our “promised vehicle” to Mexico as well 😢

[@alexandermiller5425]

@@Anthony-sn6vz Anything to help Mexico’s economy is good in my eyes

[@Anthony-sn6vz]

@@alexandermiller5425 helping there economy is great but the quality control our of the Mexico plant is not near as good as the US Plants.

[@angloblaxon]

I own a roofing company. I have an order for 5 of these. It's perfect for our sales and QC.

[@FonicsSuck]

I work for an electrical utility, I'd also love to have these for the technicians. Perfect for what we do. Plus enough payload to throw a transformer in the back if need be.

[@eliteflare6063]

Honestly that is a great idea.

[@MikeF055]

Not a smart business move at all, since you depreciate that and a full-size truck at the same rate, and at the end, have less of an asset to sell off. I'll edit this because there are many that don't understand the math. Full-size trucks are worth more at their end of depreciation than compacts, so you sell that depreciated asset off at a higher price. There will be no difference in non-deductible ancillary costs during the life of ownership that will not be overcome with the final capital sale of the vehicle.

[@wildbill23c]

@@MikeF055 Have you seen what Ford Rangers and similar trucks are selling for now? A few years ago you could pickup a Ranger, S10, etc. for less than $1000, just about scrap, now if you find a $1,000 compact pickup it should be in the scrap yard...$4k for a beat up, really beat up 2wd compact pickup now...and if you want one that's gonna last ya several years you are paying 1/2 of what it cost new 10-15 years ago. Yeah, a full size truck might sound cool, but many don't need one, and the used market for them is as bad as the compacts right now. So it really depends on the buyer and what they need/want. Many hunters want the little trucks because they're small enough to get down the trails for relatively cheap compared to an ATV or UTV.

[@slingbart705]

@@MikeF055 he didn't say what model he ordered, but if it's the hybrid, how much fuel costs did he save over that of a full size truck? and mind you Roofers prefer Van's anyway, so a $21,500 XL truck for his sales guys is perfect. I understand your points of depreciation and such, but he's saving 50% right off the bat.

[@peiguy1982]

There is no belt, it is planetary gears. Pretty durable and simple looking setup actually. It's not like Nissan's disaster, I wrongly thought the same thing about the transmission. Interesting Ike.

[@slscamg]

Yes this. I hate when people call it a CVT. Like Toyota it’s a power split devices that like you said is probably the most reliable “transmission” on the market.

[@jimfarmer7811]

The other advantages is there is no starter, alternator, turbo charger, or serpentine belt. These are all things that usually require maintenance if you own a vehicle for more than 120,000 miles.

[@peiguy1982]

@@jimfarmer7811 Are you sure it doesn't have any of those? The eCVT certainly looks stout. Nathan thinks it's the belt setup here. If they did this "truck" with AWD I could live with the hybrid. I would get stuck in my driveway for sure though FWD.

[@user-kr1or1hm4v]

A Nissan 4x4 will lasts ten times longer than a dodge pickup lol

[@peiguy1982]

@@user-kr1or1hm4v Typical attitude of an owner of Japanese brands though. Just blinded by the branding and know nothing about cars.

[@solaralloyd6157]

I'm really glad you went with the hybrid!!! All of the other reviews I've seen are on the awd. I drive delivery service for a living and currently use my 05 ranger with the 4.0. This pickup will decrease my fuel costs by at least 50%.

[@rhydynamic8306]

@Stay at Home Dad The base is $19,995 with a Hybrid engine as standard. If she’s coming from an old pickup she probably doesn’t need all that tech.

[@AJourneyOfYourSoul]

@Stay at Home Dad exactly. It is always cheaper to keep what you got.

[@solaralloyd6157]

I'm not getting rid of the old truck. I still need a 4x4. But after building one that fits my needs my total is a hair over 23k. I'm also just paying off an existing loan and need to open another line of credit. I really wont be paying any more. My payments will be lower for the Maverick than what I'm currently paying on the existing loan and I'll be spending a lot less on fuel. It also let's me park my ranger and work on it. There's not a lot I can do if I use it every day.

[@syxepop]

@Stay at Home Dad - depends on the dealer and the equipment she buys. If you order it from Ford through some dealers (Long Mc Arthur in rural KS, with a substantial YT presence, is one of them, but there are others as well) you may get the one YOU want WITHOUT ADM AT MSRP (the best you can hope for, as dealer stock has LOTS OF ADM FAT on them). If you keep it as a FWD with the 2.5L Hybrid it can get as low as in the U$23-24K range OTD for a "steelie" XL. One many would like (an XLT FWD Hybrid with medium equipment) can go below U$28K OTD that way.... That's still way below the U$41K AVERAGE (fat included) transaction price for all new vehicles.

[@syxepop]

Try ORDERING it from Ford from a dealer such as I mention below on this thread or others in or out of state, that promise to sell Mavericks AT MSRP (do your homework on the Net). Equip it as you like and you may get a nice surprise on the price (don't expect deals on units already on stock units at almost any dealer). Remember that hybrids were not delivered to dealers on initial launch and that the T-2.0L adds U$1100 and AWD adds a total of U$2300, as the Turbo is required for AWD (the towing package goes on top of AWD prices).

[@bobuncle8704]

The Maverick keeps on impressing me. Well done TFL, and we’ll done Ford.

[@TFLtruck]

Thank you for watching.

[@ripfletching]

Ford really hit the nail on the head with this truck probably one of the most purpose built vehicles Ford has produced since the raptor and their cargo van

[@seanbutler2291]

Its an escape that they hooked a bed to. Chill out francine.

[@STEALTH1USA]

Are you getting one?

[@matao87]

I think not offering the hybrid as AWD is a big miss.

[@STEALTH1USA]

@@matao87 Agreed, it should be an available option. Personally being in Texas I'm not too worried about it, just less moving parts.

[@ripfletching]

@@STEALTH1USA no I have a f150 my wife’s in a wheelchair so the next vehicle I buy needs to be a wheelchair accessible van

[@voltecrules624]

42 mpg city, starts under $20,000, and scores 92 pts on this test? This may be Truck of the Year.

[@brandonreder9869]

Yeah but Motor Trend won't give this magnificent truck truck off the year, they'll find an excuse to put the Ram up for truck of the year and give it to them again because they're all up on their nuts! Oh it's got a different shade of blue exterior color available to it now, looks like it's the truck off the year again boys!

[@creigmacc]

Ad revenue isn't silent that's for sure.

[@FrankySilverFace]

Can't trust money trend anymore.

[@cjeam9199]

42?! Wow

[@lostsurferjames5]

These will be a hit here in Florida. I might switch in a couple years muself

[@drewelliott9062]

In all the reviews from all the different channels I've watched on KZbin the Maverick has received overwhelming positive opinions.

[@tomosburn3838]

Thank you, guys. great review. Ordered mine in June also XLT Hybrid, coming out of a 7.3L 1997 F350 4x4 that I've owned for 15 years. Empty nester and a move from Colorado to Mississippi means I just don't need a big truck anymore. This should pull my johnboat just fine. Thank you, Ford, and thanks again TFL.

[@mattbrew11]

Hi Coach!

[@conduit242]

Be careful! You need to spend $90K on another F350…the bed needs to be larger than the boat you tow 🤣👍

[@jg8263]

Good to see a guy with the sense to know you don't need a half ton to tow a jon boat. Most have lost that sense.

[@mattbrew11]

@My Pronoun is WTF wtf are you talking about

[@FonicsSuck]

@@mattbrew11 I think he's saying that trucks have gotten substantially bigger over the last few decades.

[@Xavier1320]

Honestly the more videos I see of the Maverick the more I like it. Really impressed with how well Ford built this truck!

[@samwolf8151]

I’m interested to see how the 4K towing package, with a fully loaded trailer will do.

[@coreybatorski9626]

I think they said in December they are doing that test

[@tarzwelu]

Ditto but I'm also curious to see their thoughts on the Santa Cruz. I used to never consider Hyundai but lately they've been too impressive to ignore

[@emed1977]

@@tarzwelu Nothing is “free”, so if Hyundai/Kia have sharp designs and nice interiors for less, where are they saving costs?

[@tarzwelu]

@@emed1977 less corporate bloat? Less legacy cost from decades of unionized employees? I'm sure it used to be quality but not sure that's still the case

[@shitloveaduck]

@@tarzwelu I have driven the Santa Cruz and the Maverick 2.0. They are comparable in performance. I felt the Maverick was a bit quicker, but it was only a seat of the pants opinion. The Maverick was quite a bit easier to see out of. The box was easier to use. The Santa Cruz in Canada is very expensive. They offer 2 levels, both being AWD and almost loaded, starting around $42,500 Canadian!!! Ouch! Feature for feature, the Santa Cruz is a little more expensive over all and really only compares to a Lariat model of Maverick. If you want a loaded XLT model of the Maverick, it’s about $8,000 Canadian less!!! Or over $10,000 less when compared to the top of the line Maverick (a bit of an unfair comparison, but the Santa Cruz in Canada doesn’t offer anything less than a Lariat equivalent,,,,,, big mistake on their part.

[@yamajammer76]

Ford is going to sell the hell out of these little pickups. Lots of value for the money and they actually look like a little pickup, not some bizarre lifestyle vehicle. To be honest, this is pickup enough for a lot of people unless you must compete with the Joneses the next house over.

[@seanbutler2291]

Its just going to take sales away from there ranger line. 27k is base b4 dealer fees and tax title registration. Its not that great of a deal out the door, wen you lose that much capability, in comparison to a base ranger.

[@yamajammer76]

@@seanbutler2291 Then buy a Ranger. That's what I have. I only have one vehicle so it is the perfect all around vehicle for me. The Ranger is a frame based truck and has a lot more towing and off road capability. How is Ford giving people choices a bad thing?

[@chancemcbay5585]

@@yamajammer76 this dude has a strange hatred for the Mav and is obsessed with Escapes for some reason. Kinda weird

[@jimh.412]

@@chancemcbay5585 😂😂

[@KB-bh9hp]

@@seanbutler2291 With all do respect, you don't seem to understand how Ford is positioning these things. If I need to tow a trailer, or a boat, I'll but a ranger. If I need to tow an RV, or something like that, I'll buy an f-150. If I need to tow a mountain up another mountain, I'll buy a super duty. But I don't need any of those things, I just need to haul a couch or an exercise bike a few times a year. It would be nice to have a truck, but I don't need a truck so badly that I'm willing to live with truck compromises. In comes the maverick, a hybrid that gets 15 more miles per gallon in the city than our '09 Kia Rio. Thats affordable, that's cool looking, and extremely durable on paper. That's who the maverick appeals to, the hatchback owner, not most of your ranger or super-duty owner.

[@supersnot4]

Just throwing this out there for the uninformed, this is NOT a traditional CVT. There are no belts, clutches, or wear parts of any kind in this transmission. It is entirely gear driven, with every gear in mesh all the time, even in park. It's one of the most unkillable transmissions ever designed. In a nutshell, there are two electric motors. One is used to control engine RPM, by varying its own RPM (similar to a differential), as well as start the engine and generate electricity. The other is directly connected to the axle, and is used for regen braking, EV driving, and reverse. It's also mated to one of the most reliable engines ever made. The Ford 2.5 isn't all that outstanding in terms of power, but they tend to run forever, rivaling even the venerable Ford 300 I6 in terms of durability.

[@Fabwal]

Too bad it has to be explained over and over again about the Ecvt not being a cvt. Lots of folk don't understand the difference.

[@seanbutler2291]

I can tell you with 100 % confidence that the 300 i6 is faaaaaaaaaaaar superior and more durable. Like if i had liquid in my mouth wen i had read that statement, it would have shot out my nose. Those engines were doin 500k regularly and still runnin like new, inside real trucks that took hard abuse. Abuse that would crack the mavericks frame to pieces. They even put them in tractors cuz they were soo tough.. .. I dont see too many 2.5s in tractors. Not saying the 2.5 is a bad motor. But naw it hasnt earned the nod from the 300 i6 or even the 7.3 n/a diesel. Not even close

[@supersnot4]

@@seanbutler2291 I've owned and had plenty of experience with both, and my experience directly mirrors any data I've found. Most recent for me are a '96 F-150 300 with 190K miles, a 2009 Escape hybrid with 150K miles, and a 2010 Fusion hybrid with 210K miles. I do tow trailers with the Fusion (2Klbs) and Escape (3Klbs). 300 I6 engines can and do easily top 500K miles, but they do have minor issues that usually need to be addressed by then. The phenolic timing gears are known to crack, fuel rails can overheat, distributors have minor issues, etc. Few and far between, but they do exist. 2.5 Duratecs are also known to top 500K miles, especially in taxi service. Most cars that have them end up being junked because the chassis or transmission goes bad, with the engine still running perfectly. They have their issues too, but nothing major. Things like throttle body motors, engine mounts, etc. Also very minor.

[@tammieandrzejczuk2573]

@@seanbutler2291 good thing a maverick does not have a frame to crack 😂😂😂😂😂

[@seanbutler2291]

@@supersnot4 u can google that the 2.5 can with a good owner do 2-300k,no one says anything about 500k tho. And yeah minor issues...thats jus called maintenance. Iv never seen a vehicle with that motor over 300k iv seen dozens of those 300s tho. Again im sure its not a bad engine. But u give me the choice 100% of the time im goin with the i6.

[@leslyerobinson3963]

I've had this truck pegged as a winner if they delivered the price and specs they promised months ago. Looks like they have, and in the sub $30K market it would be hard to beat. With gas through the roof this couldn't have come at a better time.

[@vj8452]

Seems like the US consumer for Pick Ups is finally coming to its senses. Not everyone needs to drive an F250 around. Alone. With zero scratches in the bed.

[@daveunknown01]

@@vj8452 you just described the 3 people who live on my block lol. I haul more shit in the back of my 94 suburban then those 3 trucks have seen combined.

[@timjohnson1199]

@@vj8452 Not just consumers, manufactures too.

[@dennisporter753]

I think it's pretty awesome for what it is.. a small pickup.. it's not pretending to be a full size gas guzzler.. at 27,000 dollars it's a bargain to get all the versatility the Maverick delivers.. Glad you did the Hybrid test.. put it to its limits and did a 92% ratings.. Fantastic if you really think about it..

[@seanbutler2291]

U could buy a 2012 used ford escape and get the exact same vehicle for way less than 27k, hell u could get one all optioned out for way less. I say the exact same cuz u jus have to ignore the roof in the back. Base model like what they have is a bit cheaper than the ranger, u start putting options on, might as well get the ranger u get sooo much more. Its jus ford trying to take ridgeline sales.

[@Fabwal]

@@seanbutler2291 Ford has a hit on it's hands with the new Maverick. Ranger gets the same bad gas mileage as a F-150. Plus the 1500 hundred pound payload, equals larger trucks. Works for me. lol

[@josephs8364]

@@seanbutler2291 not the same vehicle at all.

[@yamajammer76]

@@seanbutler2291 I don't get your comments about this vehicle. You seem to be upset that Ford is offering this vehicle for sale, but why are more choices for consumers bad? Simple solution... Don't like it. Don't buy it. If others like it and it seems like a lot do then let them buy one. It's called a free market economy.

[@normcheers1726]

@@seanbutler2291 Hopefully you realize there is a bit more engineering involved then throwing a bed on an escape. You could buy a 2012 escape cheaper, that’s thought provoking. You could get a Ranger that was designed in 2012 and rides and handles poorly, and has less interior room. If you don’t need an off-roader but you need awd, and you tow under 4k, then seems like the Maverick would be better with better mpg.

[@billymiller8891]

The 2 liter gas engine marvick will have a 4,000lbs tow rating and AWD. I would love to see a review of that one!

[@maxracingteam23]

Yes with max trailer on the Ike!!!

[@MrLM002]

That's fair. That being said the only reason I think the non hybrid Mavericks are selling RN is because you can't buy the hybrid rn..

[@Wearyman]

@@MrLM002 You can order any version right now. Takes about 3 months to get one in. Ford apparently was able to get a big shipment of the Maverick electronics in JUST before the supply chain problems kicked in, so they are delivering vehicles as fast as they can build them.

[@mccall5938]

I would rather see the Ecoboost awd do the test.

[@MrLM002]

@@Wearyman Order and buy are two different things. I ordered a Tesla M3 that Tesla never made. Buying is 'This car is available for purchase now'. I've yet to see a single hybrid Maverick on any lot.

[@RobertBeedle]

I knew it would drone a bit after owning a Prius for 7 years. I can handle that, great review

[@1guyin10]

That can definitely be forgiven in exchange for a pickup that gets 40ish mpg.

[@wildbill23c]

Yeah just turn the radio up louder HAHA!!!

[@rdubs1705]

I might be adding some sound dampening to my Mav hybrid =)

[@davidyaroch6622]

Like he said, That's why there's a stereo in the truck.

[@1leggeddog]

This lil truck continues to impress me everytime

[@kennethwilliamson6565]

I like how they complain about certain things and put in “for only 27k I should have satellite and a quiet cab” etc. and I’m here trying to understand how they are building a hybrid starting at 20k that’s more usable than a Honda Accord. Seriously I get they have to critique things but you get a little truck hybrid with heated seats and steering wheel and apple car play/android auto. For 27k in this insane overinflated market. That’s a straight win. And you can’t compare the ranger. To get a full 4 door and 4x4 on a base Model XL trim it’s 33k… that’s how much a loaded maverick is with the 4k package awd lariat heated seats the works. And a slightly roomier rear seat configuration. You either build value in the ranger with tech or features or lower the price. The ranger doesn’t even get integrated trailer brakes!!! Also I’m happy when Andre and Nathan do the Ike I like the perspective from them two. Glad grumpy Roman doesn’t do them anymore. Anyways good episode thanks for doing this for us.

[@johnross6314]

You are 100% 💯 correct. I will go back and edit my comment now. Adding what you suggest about the total bias against Ford. That stems from the old man patriarchy, who has disdain for Ford. And fetish with Ram IMO. Look, this comes with Apple Car Play and Android Auto STANDARD. THIS SHOULD ADD BACK TWO POINTS :). Ford stats show that this is the group they want to cater to. They get their music (and Podcasts of FLT) online or downloaded. Sat radio has a 3.6% take rate for vehicles like this. I subscribe to Sirius/XM in multiple vehicles. However, over time, been dumping them. They served a great purpose over the years. But, have not kept up with HD audio, costs to customers have exploded, cell build out is much more complete (with unlimited plans too).

[@Jbayle1]

This truck seems like a good idea when you don't want to pay $40 grand and don't really need a truck all that often.

[@austin_bennett]

I'm glad this segment exsists & I hope it grows but this just shows that despite not being as capable as a midsize truck it can still be a little workhorse if needed

[@CraigSmith568]

I'm glad to see you test this one over the all wheel drive model. It really doesn't compare with anything else out there. I would consider one of these as a replacement for my car while keeping my truck for heavy hauling or towing. Great for everyday use where you occasionally need to haul something a little more than your average car is capable of while getting great fuel mileage.

[@youtubeaccount9058]

I love how this entire truck costs than just the options package for the F150 in their "Cost of luxury" video a couple days ago.

[@rik999]

I've towed with FWD and uphill it's a struggle on loose or slippery surfaces. The tongue weight of the trailer unloads the front axle of the tow vehicle and you can get stuck with the front wheels spinning madly on even modest grades. A weight distributing hitch is essential to tow with FWD even with a very light (2000 lb) trailer and a 200-300 lb tongue weight.

[@shitloveaduck]

Well said!! More people need to know how important load equalizer hitches really are! There are so many KZbin RVers out there that have totalled their units and damaged or totalled their units that are saying they crashed due to not using the hitches and sway control. Multiply that by the number of other people out there with improperly hitched up units,,,,,,. I responded to so many accidents with RVs rolled over. Not all with positive outcomes for the people. There were fatalities over the years.

[@richardbrown4816]

Andre and Nathan were the weight distribution

[@bryanhersman4037]

Depends on how far the hitch is behind the rear axle. The closer the hitch is to the rear axle the less it has for leverage to unload the front. That super short bed actually helps here.

[@wildbill23c]

That's why the 4k tow package is only available on the AWD model, so you still have traction to get moving and keep the vehicle stable LOL. Equilizer hitch is a must for these types of vehicles to help put some of that weight back on the front end.

[@slingbart705]

@@richardbrown4816 HA so true!

[@hunt7572]

Perfect review because I plan on getting a teardrop camper with my Maverick and traveling to all the NASCAR cup races on the east coast

[@Commoncrumbs]

I’m also getting a teardrop for my hybrid maverick. Mine just got changed from scheduled to production on Friday!!!!

[@nascar88ford]

I have a F-150 to tow my camper, but I ordered me one as my 120-mile daily commuter vehicle. You'll have fun at the races!

[@cjeam9199]

@@nascar88ford why would you have a truck as a commuter vehicle though? Hell get an EV for that.

[@nascar88ford]

@@cjeam9199 Good question. I feel like this vehicle offers the best of both worlds... Bigger than my current Kia Rio, comparable fuel economy, bigger cab, more comfortable, it has a bed, it's practical, and a big bang for your buck.

[@AHungryHunky]

@@cjeam9199 Cheaper than any decent EV on the market, better fuel economy than it's competition without the range and charger dead zone anxiety of an ev and roomier than nearly anything else in it's starting price range and it's still smaller than a full size making it more friendly to drive. Seems like compelling reasons to buy it even if one never intends to use the bed. Ford really wants a slice of everyone's pie with this thing and I honestly wouldn't be surprised at all to find out they are selling them at a loss to encourage more people into their more expensive models, like the F-150 powerboost or lighting, later on.

[@thunderroad7289]

I’m buying one of those for short trips around town hauling light loads. Not worried about it being a unibody. If I’m going to haul real loads I’ll use my F 350

[@johnross6314]

@@wilmarbarrick3194 not just the fuel “savings”. Where and tear, believe me again know as F350 owner, that leads to more maintenance (leave the mileage growth to SD worthy activities), Mav is easier to move around town and visits to supply companies. It is nice for the spouse. It just works. I bet many people will get one to supplement their heavy duty truck.

[@NANA-lq5md]

@@johnross6314 that's why I'm getting one.

[@seanbutler2291]

Id get the ranger then. If u get completely base maverick, sure its cheaper, u start putting options on might as well get a ranger. Or jus shell out 3k for a used ford escape. Same exact vehicle, jus has a roof where the bed would be.

[@TheFlooringInspector82]

@@wilmarbarrick3194 I get your point, but I too ordered one of these and own a Ram 3500. I put about 40,000 miles a year on my company vehicle which is why I ordered a Maverick Lariat, FX4, with luxury package and 4k towing. Mine was around $37,500 but the annual fuel savings will be $4,257.60 (compared to if I used my Ram) so over 4 years of ownership (about how long I keep my company vehicles) I will save over $17,000 in fuel.

[@surfingawaveoflife]

I like having an option to put stuff in the back. Motorcycles, Surfboards...etc. many don't need to pull a heavy load.

[@RogerM88]

This truck fits the needs of most truck costumers, haul those heavy loads of grocery bags.

[@ChrisH421]

And a Toyota Carolla fits the needs of most car buyers yet we celebrate people being able to get what they want

[@seanbutler2291]

Thats what ur ford escape is for.

[@SuzukiKid400]

How do you know what most truck customers use their trucks for?

[@STEALTH1USA]

Damn dictator over here mandating people's "needs" 😂

[@TheZeusJuice]

@@STEALTH1USA They're not mandating nothing; didn't say "bigger trucks should be banned". Just stating a simple fact; "this is a good truck for most truck owners".

[@legochicano]

Very good review. I never see other reviewers measuring sound and hills for towing purposes. Keep up the great work you guys.

[@williamroberts8768]

The Maverick interior cabin looks spacious with two big guys in the front passenger area. Towing is secondary, I am already impressed.

[@Evilliboba]

Supposed to have more room inside than a Ranger because of the unibody construction. I probably should have waited for this to come up instead of buying my Ranger back in August.

[@cliffordmontana4562]

@@Evilliboba I think you made the right choice. You would’ve waited a long while to get your maverick and you would’ve paid msrp for it. Rangers are cool trucks.

[@NaruSanavai]

"Towing is secondary" - as it should be with a truck this size. If you buy a compact truck and your first consideration is towing capacity, you've already screwed up.

[@mcatlow8]

This truck is gonna be another smash hit from Ford. Thanks guys.

[@sho942000]

No, it's going to be a problematic turd.

[@VideoArchiveGuy]

Delivery sometime around 2026.

[@tacticalidiot175]

@@sho942000 You lost lmao. Cry

[@BaracW]

Wait, a half inch squat is calculated as 1/2 inch on left side + plus 1/2 on right side = 1 inch of squat? Come on, even your tape measure indicates it squatted about 1/2 inch...you don't add the 2 sides. Otherwise your 3 inch lift is a really a 6 inch lift. 🤣

[@TheFlooringInspector82]

It was sitting on uneven ground the average between the two sides was about an inch. So in other words the other side was squatted 1.5 inches and the side he showed was squatted about half an inch. If you add the two together you get two inches which would give you an average of 1 inch across the two sides.

[@account4info]

Guys could apply this measuring technique to other things

[@michaelmcgranor1565]

I ordered the XL hybrid with a hitch. Glad to know it can do a good job hauling my utility trailer and some light loads. I think Ford hit a home run with this truck. It’s going to be really successful and probably bring Chevrolet and Dodge into this segment as well.

[@account4info]

An updated version of the original Ranger probably would sell nearly as good if they made it again

[@Sheepleton]

The hybrid should be really reliable too, they've used hybrid escapes as taxis for years and easily rack up hundreds of thousands of miles

[@stephenj4937]

I couldn't live with the XL - I have to have cruise control.

[@heath3757]

Add an aftermarket cc

[@mfgxl]

That is the exact same vehicle I ordered

[@mad125100]

I ordered this exact truck but I don't need to tow with it. I am keeping my 2020 RAM for towing my travel trailer.

[@P4SDetails]

I’m glad you guys are out torture testing the Mav because I am anxious to see how it performs.

[@speharjason]

Ike Gauntlet is back baby. Love to see these test videos rolling out as we close in on the end of the year!!!!

[@joshuahoffbuhr1476]

I started watching this video thinking about capabilities and limitations just due to the drive train and such. I left this video thinking this would be about as versatile a vehicle as you could own. Thoroughly impressed.

[@sydecarnutz972]

Thank you guys! Nice to see a group doing cool tests of the hybrid model. Seems the 2.0 and 4WD gets all the love from reviewers. I have a hybrid on order, so this means a lot to me! Keep up the great work! Subscribed!

[@ontheroadwithralph1530]

Along with Andre's comparison of the various versions of the Maverick about a month ago, this is one of the most insightful review of the pickup I've watched (tho' Nathan was wrong about the eCVT - no belts). Nathan's observations about the bed's accessibility and the ease of reach over the side walls were the features that convinced me to order a Maverick; it will be my first truck ever. I only wish it was available now as either a plug-in hybrid or full battery electric.

[@jked7463]

You need to do the same with the lowest priced 4x4 that has the tow package and 4000 tow rating.

[@frankr111th]

I'm very impressed with this new Maverick.

[@marknelson463]

Glad to see a review of the standard hybrid model as opposed to the optional turbo model

[@billmalec]

What ever been waiting for. May find a place to order the hybrid tomorrow(the last day to order). Wait a second here. You guys put on aftermarket exhausts on other trucks and say it sounds good. Isn't that droning also...

[@solomonshaffer832]

It's called an "ECVT" because it IS continuously variable, but not by a belt.... it's two electric motors interacting with the engine via a planetary gear set to achieve an infinite number of "gear ratios." It's not because it has a "stepped feeling"

[@crimsonzorro]

Thanks for the review. The hybrid engine setup was impressive. You should mention the engine in the title.

[@deltadcrouse]

Great video guys and nice to see Nathan, big thumbs up 👍

[@rash0401]

You guys do an absolutely fantastic job reviewing trucks! Due to the price and market.... iIm not ready yet to pull the trigger. but I feel watching your reviews that when the time comes, I will be making the right choice for my application. Thank you!

[@davidtkach223]

This is exactly what I wanted to see! Thanks again guys!🎯

[@wranglercody8422]

I gotta stop watching videos of this truck, I keep wanting one more and more.

[@nm-qt2hb]

The more I learn about this truck, the more I like it. For under $30,000 , it's a great choice. Great video guys. Go get some hot chocolate with a shot of cheer. You two looked cold 🥶.

[@seanbutler2291]

Yeah 27k base before dealer fees tax title registration. Bet ull walk out the door at almost 40k. Id take a base ranger. U get a much better all round truck, rather than a ford escape with a bed.

[@nm-qt2hb]

@@seanbutler2291 As tested it was under $30,000. All those add on would apply to the Ranger also. Love the Ranger, had an 2005 FX4. Two totally different vehicles. You could also make the same argument about the Ranger and cost Vs the F150. The rear seat room sucks in the Ranger . For a few dollars more you can get a nice F150.

[@chancemcbay5585]

@@nm-qt2hb right, this argument doesn't hold up. For a few thousand more, just get a F-150. A little more buy an F-350. Little more just get a tank. Bro just buy a space shuttle

[@nm-qt2hb]

@@chancemcbay5585 That's kind of my point in the first place? Two different vehicles for two different needs.

[@chancemcbay5585]

@@nm-qt2hb I'm agreeing with you. That comment was more directed to the guy you were replying to

[@eliasnull]

Great video. I always enjoy the hands-on review and non-biased judging.

[@slightlynuts]

The people who are saying that the Maverick isn't a real truck are the same kind of people that back in the early '90s said the Cherokee XJ wasn't a real SUV. It doesn't need to be 100 feet tall, for get 5MPG - If it has a bed on the back, its a truck.

[@davidtkach223]

I'm also so glad you used the Hybrid for this test its rare to see a Hybrid video. Ordered my hybrid in July, I just wish Ford would tell us why they are not shipping them.

[@sydecarnutz972]

I believe that it was just last week that they started shipping them to the USA. I ordered mine last month. I expect it'll be March before I see it on the lot to pick up! You should have yours soon!

[@C-Henry]

I've already marked this rig as one to consider when I need to replace a vehicle, but its the weirdest feeling thinking that, depending on the package, I could either replace my dedicated commuter, or consolidate my commuter and 4x4 back down to one vehicle. I've seen enough reviews to believe the AWD version could do almost everything I use my 4x4 for. I never would've expected this kind of choice from one model of car.

[@seanbutler2291]

A ford ranger or tacoma can literally do anything this thing could do but better. Except mpg, u trade a lil mpg....for a lot more capability.

[@C-Henry]

@@seanbutler2291 True, but in my current situation price is a big deal, at best I could maybe do a used Ranger, but I doubt I'll ever have Toyota money.

[@Mattthewanderer]

I just now started looking around and found this gem. Thank you so much for testing it the hard way!

[@RVAHokie]

One of the most interesting TFL reviews lately! This little "truck-lite" ticks a lot of the right boxes for a lot of people, like a new millenium version of my dearly departed 1989 Mazda B2200 which I loved. That MPG on the climb was amazing, and the FWD didn't prove to be much problem at all until that last 2 seconds of the vid pulling out of the snow. I would worry about grip if I lived in the snow belt, but that is what the AWD 2.0 version is for. Anywhere else, this little thing would be great 90% or more of the year for light duty service.

[@tomastylecek7209]

i love it hope they fix the supply issue soon

[@09blackcobaltss]

Good Video and yes its a truck if Ford calls it a truck and the Unibody Ridgeline is a truck its a truck no need to go into schmantics, Also taking off points for not having Sat radio which is some subscription you have to pay for and it comes with android auto and apple car play so you can just connect your phone and use the better and more tailored Spotify or other music streaming services is just plain Odd to me. Also its a cheap vehicle of course is going to have hard plastics but at least they arent dull grey and boring looking like 90 percent of other hard plastics in other vehicles. I am debating going all out and getting a mostly full optioned lariat or saving a few thousand and getting a 2.0 FX4 with the 4k towing package and 360 packages which is around 29 to 30k

[@andrewgee241]

Whether it is unibody or body on frame is a relevant piece of info but it is just one piece of info. Not an automatic disqualification like some think. If it does 95 percent of what pickup truck owners do in real life then its a pickup.

[@ZilsR922]

Thank-you Ford Motor Company, especially the great people at Sames Ford in Corpus Christi, TX. for being so wonderful to my brother on Veteran's Day. What a great surprise for him to receive his 2022 White Maverick on Veteran's Day.

[@racecar021872]

Some people need to do more research when doing drives or reviews on vehicles. The E-CVT in the Maverick is a lot like the Toyota Prius, Rav 4 and Highlander Hybrid Transmissions. They are also E-CVTs. They have a Planetary Gear Set (which Toyota calls a Power Split Device) which is driven via an Electric Motor/Generator and varies its speed to give you Variable Gear Ratios, no belts or pulleys needed or used. Much less moving parts than a typical Automatic or Belt driven CVT transmission. Go check out Weber Automotives video on the Toyota Rav 4 E-CVT Transmission, they go into great detail on how it all works, very informative.

[@mikesawyer1336]

I believe he did call it a power split.. But they should highlight the eCVT as being completely different than the old Belt driven CVT. They did take points away for the Droning of the engine though - which is the aspect of all CVT that a lot of people don't like. ( I don't mind it at all as it puts the engine in it's most efficient power band.)

[@m3bimmer1]

I think your videos on trucks are great. I do have one recommendation I think would be a good addition to your testing programs. I own a full size truck and personally towing, payload, handling under load are all applicable tests for a truck. However 0 - 60 is useless to me since a truck I fell should be rated on it's capabilities as a truck not racing. 1 second faster or slower is of no consequence. My recommendation is to have braking tests. How well does a vehicle stop when empty,loaded , towing and towing while carrying a full load. This is directly related to the safety of a vehicle and should be tested in the real world.

[@marklihsu]

Truck newbie here. The Maverick can tow 2,000 pounds and has 1,500 payload does that mean you can have both and the truck will still move? So tow 2k lbs along with 1,500 lbs in the bed?

[@jameswitte5676]

No. 1,500 is your max payload. If your towing 2,000 pounds, that puts about 200 pounds on your hitch. That leaves you 1,300 pounds from which you must deduct your weight and the weight of your passengers. Then there is GVWR - gross vehicle weight rating. This is the max allowed weight for the vehicle, passengers, cargo and trailer. The GVWR will probably prevent you from maxing out your payload AND towing capacities at the same time. I don’t see a listing for the Maverick’s GVWR by Ford.

[@jeffman3]

CVT and hybrid already tells me they're doing a towing test with a truck NOT equipped with their full towing setup which comes with the ecoboost and AWD. This really is an impressive little trucklet.

[@galamonkey]

Saw my first one in person from my car yesterday. Didnt have a chance to get out and walk up to it, but looked great in person.

[@christopherhamilton5557]

That looks like exactly the spec I have ordered. Velocity Blue XLT Hybrid with XLT lux package and co-pilot 360! Cool! $27,300? Before discounts? Nice!

[@alvareza3]

I love that you did it with the hybrid motor. That is literally the truck I am looking at. XLT with luxury package and the ford 360. Great video. No points take. Off. 100/100. New benchmark. Keep up the great work.

[@mikesawyer1336]

I ordered oni August - build date December 20th ;-)

[@POWERLEADX]

Great review. You guys make a great team. 👍

[@JUAN75001]

Excellent Work Andre and Nathan !!

[@ragnarmagnusson63]

This video was the clincher for me. I reserved(ordered) my hybrid Maverick, yesterday. Great analysis with data points. Thanks, guys.

[@chrisb5986]

That truck and trailer is a pretty sweet combo.

[@briandeiwert5911]

Guys, it's a pickup truck. Don't get messed up by the lack of a body on frame architecture. You wouldn't say the XJ Jeep Cherokee isn't an SUV because it was unibody. If it has an open bed for cargo it's a truck. The Maverick is a fine light duty truck that 80% of people can live with. Big enough bed for dirty things like mulch, can carry something you found at an antique store, enough of a tow rating for motorcyles and small water craft, and with the 4K tow package it'll handle a decent sized boat or camping trailer. The ground clearance and AWD will handle a typical forest road to that back country camping site you like. If you need more truck get more truck. No one is stopping you. The Maverick is just like the Honda Ridgeline, but one size smaller: Enough truck for what most people actually need.

[@txredkim867]

Great review of the hybrids towing capabilities. Mines a Lariat Hybrid that is built and I'm confident my pickup will have no problems tackling tasks! IF, Ford ever ships them!

[@venomstrike4418]

Will be interested when they release the hybrid with AWD!!

[@Scott-uo7ns]

The maverick seems to be the replacement to the explorer sport trac

[@KB-bh9hp]

I get that vibe as well, basically a sport Trac, but better in every way.

[@MikeXCSkier]

Really like the fact that you guys did this in Colorado (and are from Colorado). I live in Denver and I've taken this I-70 route many times to go skiing. I'm looking at the Maverick seems to check the boxes that I need: fuel efficiency for my daily commute and a small truck to haul my gear to go skiing and mountain biking on the weekends.

[@bechtoea]

I built my truck out. It's around $27K configured the way I want it. It's basically an XLT Hybrid with the luxury package. Just a great little truck.

[@JacobyDannford]

Make an AWD hybrid and I’d be interested. Love the thought of a lightning but am apprehensive due to never owning an EV. Great video though!

[@1guyin10]

I would expect an AWD in the future. Ford tends to hold things back at launch. This drivetrain has AWD in the Escape, so it will take very little engineering to add it to the Maverick.

[@dadmezz4024]

Thanks! I ordered the xl hybrid. It is nice to know its characteristics with near peak payload capability in cold weather. Wonder what the characteristics would be in hot weather. It will add a strain to the cooling system at the engines higher output revs. I don't intend to go up any mountains but retirement is coming.

[@mfgxl]

I ordered an XL too. I almost ordered the XLT because I wanted cruise control, but found out there will be an easy and inexpensive aftermarket cruise control.

[@lightman489]

I own a Toyota Camry hybrid and the maverick has the same hybrid system...in bullhead az this summer it was a 122 degrees I'd idled the car 4 5 hours and rarely did the engine kick on and it maintained 70 inside of the car...during driving on hot days hybrid seem less effected than gas only car's. My neighbors prius just passed 500k then his battery went out $1000 and he is headed to million miles ...and that is why I bought a hybrid

[@thegranddestination]

Great review Andre and Nathan! Looking forward to see the Santa Cruz in the same test. Kindly, it would be great to see the Subaru Baja 2.5L Turbo in the same comparisons and see how past performs vs present. The Subaru Baja is rated for 2,200lb towing capacity. Would be an awesome comparison and in doing so you may influence Subaru to reintroduce the Baja to secure the segment they started back in 2003 and walked away from in 2006 with the last Baja model.

[@ScottWallace5]

Great video and drive, so glad you did it in the hybrid version. Very impressed with this mini truck! I'm curious to see how the Santa Fe version will do.

[@wizeguiz]

Fantastic honest test! I may trade in my 2020 Ranger Lariat FX4 for a Maverick in the summer of 2022. I would want the 4x4 version as I have to deal with a lot of snow here in Western NY(lake effect snow). Cheers!

[@marknewman9430]

Just curious coming from a ranger owner, what are the reasons that would sway you to get the maverick?

[@wizeguiz]

@@marknewman9430 The ride is bouncy with the FX4 package, I do not like the HVAC controls(I prefer real knobs) and the mileage is OK, but I prefer a little more than 17around town and 22-23 on the highway.

[@gerardovm207]

Make more videos for the Hybrid! MPG test, please!!!!!!!!

[@tigman47]

Seriously looking at ordering a hybrid. From your testing how would you say it would perform as a daily driver. 35 miles each way to business at 65/70 mph. Then 20/30 miles city under 45 each day. Is it capable of sustained hwy speeds .

[@timjohnson1199]

Nice! This is timely for me as I'm looking at teardrop trailers right now.

[@shitloveaduck]

I really like the Maverick!! I have driven the 2.0 litre EcoBoost AWD. It’s quicker than my 2021 Ridgeline. It feels very good on the highway and two track trails. I was able to drive pretty quick on the trails. I don’t know that I would replace a Ridgeline with the Maverick for most people, but I am seriously considering it! I don’t tow over 3500 lbs for the use it will see. I do hate the comparison that this could be as much as a Ranger. That’s not true if you match feature for feature!! The Ranger is always a few thousand more! The Maverick has more content though!! A loaded Maverick is more than a base Ranger, that happens with all size classes of pickups in all the brands,,,,,, always has been the issue since they started offering heavily optioned small trucks. It’s kind of a “duh no kidding” type of comment. Pointless.

[@seanbutler2291]

They arent saying they are the same price, they are saying for a few thousand more u get a vehicle that is made FAR FAR better. U shouldnt hear a lil 2.0 hybrid at almost 80 decibels, it was at least 5-7 decibels louder in the cab than the 7.3 big block with pipes, this indicates cheap construction and insulation. I could go get a 2012 escape used for a few grand and prolly get it all optioned out, and do everything the maverick will do, cuz they are the same vehicle. And the escape will do better off-road, better approach and departure angles.

[@shitloveaduck]

@@seanbutler2291 - I don’t consider the Hybrid when I make a comment. I should have clarified that. I have experience with the 2.0 EcoBoost with AWD. That will be quiet as the Bronco Sport, if not a bit quieter. That is the Maverick I would compare to the Ranger. The Hybrid has some expensive technology and some very high fuel economy ratings that are proving true that warrant a bit of a premium. If you get the front wheel drive model, it’s for very different reasons than the AWD models. Like I said feature for feature they don’t compare. I also said the Maverick offers more features than the Ranger. If you want a truck that gets great fuel economy to haul occasionally and are considering a Maverick, the Ranger isn’t even close to being an option. None of the mid size trucks are. It stands alone as an offering really, especially here in Canada as you can only get the Santa Cruz in AWD and very heavily optioned. Just over 20K for a hybrid pickup?? Nothing compares, and that’s ok, just don’t compare. The reason I always say feature for feature.

[@bryanhersman4037]

The $20,000 hybrid has everything you need in a truck like this and the most basic Ranger isn't a few thousand more, it's 25% more, and will use probaly $3000 more in fuel over the first 100,000 miles.

[@NariTheMan]

I like to see the same sound test in the Lariat trim since it has"acoustic" windshield

[@seriesblueadventures9832]

Good point, though I doubt that will help with cabin drone from engine noise, which tends to come through the firewall, and the floor of the vehicle.

[@NariTheMan]

@@seriesblueadventures9832 I'm hoping it would help with the general outside noise

[@epa316]

Thank you for reviewing the hybrid; this is the one I'm really interested in.

[@petenanna]

eCVT means that there is NO actual transmission. Its just the engine connected (only by wire) to the electric motor. The electric motor controller acts as the 'transmission' by spinning the motor faster or slower and with direct connection to the drive axles spinning the wheels faster or slower. Ingenious really. Simple too. But I hate those calling it a CVT like there is an actual transmission. If there is one then show me in the video and point to it. Then point to the electric drive motor. I'm really really glad you reviewed the hybrid too! You towed with it! You could have told us abiout traction in the snow. How good was it? it Looked good to me. Its much better than some heavy full size truck in 2wd. Those tire bust loose easy even in the rain.

[@allentoyokawa9068]

no one cars about manscape

[@DavidGarcia-vh3ul]

I installed a Tesla style radio on my Ford Focus and in the day most of the time the screen is very hard to see. If Ford would have tilted the screen back, it would be difficult to see in the day.

[@michaeltaylor1302]

Awesome review guys!!

[@GibbSaw63]

Nobody's mentioned it but I'd like to say thank you to ford for not putting bullshit beauty covers on their new models engines

[@Wearyman]

Love this little truck, probably am going to order one to replace my aging 2008 Jeep Liberty. But MAN did they miss a trick when they didn't give the Hybrid AWD. I'm telling you, if they had a Hybrid with AWD, I wouldn't still be hemming and hawing. If they gave the Hybrid AWD AND the FX4 and 4K tow packages I'd already have one in my driveway.

[@venomstrike4418]

I have no doubt they will release a AWD Hybrid, maybe even as early as next year.

[@Wearyman]

@@venomstrike4418 Maybe. there is an issue with the horsepower on the Hybrid though. I suspect that's why they didn't. (I guess it only has like 180hp, vs the 250 of the gas model) So they will have to address that too. Doesn't matter for me, by the time that comes out I will already have the gas model in my driveway.

[@mfgxl]

Weary Man Dude... Patience. Let them get the easier stuff out first and expand with time. My 04 Liberty is staying in the family when I get my XL.

[@Wearyman]

@@mfgxl Oh I'm sure they will. I just feel like they missed something they really should have had at launch. No worries, I'm sure I will be very happy with the gas model. I guarantee it will be more fuel efficient than my "brick on MTs" Libby I have now. :D

[@rowerwet]

It's coming, but right now they're having enough trouble getting it launched. I would expect an electric motor in the rear axle for AWD, over the prop shaft, much like the Prius AWD

[@Quickicecarreviews123]

Wow that’s so impressive! I think most of the points taken were nit picky. I really want a hybrid. Have a fusion hybrid and love it but want a truck. Maybe get it lifted?

[@ericellison1129]

Looks like a great little truck not to bad of a price range, cant wait to see the other companies same trucks on the ike

[@WUStLBear82]

They call it an 'eCVT' because it *isn't* a CVT in the sense of a mechanical device with variable-diameter pulleys driven by belt/chain. Toyota/Ford's hybrid system uses a single-ratio planetary gearset and all the variation in "ratio" is achieved by changing the rotation speed or direction of two electric motors (reversing rotation changes one electric motor into a generator) which along with the internal combustion engine are connected to the three planetary gearset components.

[@bryanmills2295]

99.99% of the posters here bitching about CVTs don't understand this.

[@RogerM88]

These Hybrids, or PHEVs make perfect sense as a transition to BEVs or alternative as Fuel Cells. But first the Power Grid needs to be upgraded, preferable with Nuclear Reactors, and battery technology evolves to produce less toxic batteries, not requiring so much rare metals.

[@georgeionescu6425]

they should start with the power source,getting rid of coal,oil,and son,but the greed is just so big,they dont care about the future,only about getting rich

[@anonym3017]

yeah it's 20 years too late for that. and LFP batteries already use no rare earths whatsoever. what does however use lots of rare earths is hardening steel for valve seals/conrods/crank as well as being required for refining oil into various fuels. SO the entire thing is just a red herring.

[@RogerM88]

@@georgeionescu6425 you can't rid of fossil fuel powered grid without replacing it with a stable output source of power. Modern Nuclear Reactors are way safer, and they would provide less emissions and the power needed to support more BEVs on the grid. Also the aeronautic and naval industries need more efficient engines, not just the car industry.

[@marvetheman]

Good test and interesting info. I'd want the absolute base model version of this with a trailer hitch. I don't need heated and cooled seats or lane departure warnings. I go back to the days when base model trucks had 3 speed manuals and vinyl seats. Any vehicle with air conditioning is all the luxury I need.

[@ElectronicsForFun]

I think things like lane departure, back up cameras, and automatic breaking are federally mandated on all new cars sold in the US since 2018.

[@cjeam9199]

3 speed manuals? Didn’t even know that was a thing.

[@marvetheman]

@@cjeam9199 yup column shifted called three on the tree.

[@ninersforlife7682]

Good video. My brother just bought a Maverick Lariat he says he gets about 30 miles per gallon on the highway he has the 2.0 All wheel drive FX4. So far he likes it.

[@browndogstt8546]

You guys are really enjoying this ike. Cool little trucklet!! Andre has just named a new class of truck.😄