It's true - The Earth is flat!

The Earth is flat and I'm going to prove it! I have the math, I have the method. By the end of this video your biggest worry in life will be falling off the edge.
CREDITS
Concept - Something I read when I was a kid
Oblate spheroid - Tomruen CC BY-SA 4.0
Spherical cap - Jhmadden CC BY-SA 4.0
All of the maths - ChatGPT (not me)
DAVID MELLOR'S MUSIC
David Mellor's music on Bandcamp - davidmellor.bandcamp.com/
David Mellor's music on Spotify - open.spotify.com/artist/6OkaD...
Available on all good streaming services
EQUIPMENT USED TO MAKE AUDIO MASTERCLASS VIDEOS
CAMERA - Sony Alpha A6600 amzn.to/3uj7Dtq
COMPUTER - Apple Mac Mini M2 Pro amzn.to/47tW6Wg
MICROPHONE - Sennheiser MKH 416 amzn.to/3QWWvuO
ALTERNATIVE MICROPHONE - AKG C414 amzn.to/3SLqCad
BUDGET MICROPHONE CHOICE - Rode shotgun amzn.to/3G0ni36
MICROPHONE PREAMPLIFIER - Comica LinkFlex AD2 amzn.to/40SMHFT
TELEPROMPTER - Padcaster Parrot alternatives amzn.to/40A55TJ
TELEPROMPTER SOFTWARE - PromptSmart Pro promptsmart.com/
AUDIO INTERFACE - Behringer UMC202HD amzn.to/3ugj6db
HEADPHONES - Sony wired amzn.to/3sEjlht
SPEAKER CABLE - KabelDirekt amzn.to/3ucgQ6T
POWER AMPLIFIER - Fosi V3 amzn.to/3vRumNH
KEYLIGHT- Amaran 100d amzn.to/40A5Gor
FILL LIGHTS - Switti RGB amzn.to/3ufhOPu
SOFTBOX Phot-R alternatives amzn.to/3QGoTjJ
LIGHTING STANDS Phot-R alternatives amzn.to/3QWXOKe
MONITOR - Samsung UJ59 amzn.to/3MEoBsk
MONITOR ARM - Invision alternatives amzn.to/40SLqi5
MIC ARM - Neewer amzn.to/49Ob0sD
TRIPOD - Velbon alternatives amzn.to/46gu2oa
GREEN SCREEN - Elgato alternatives amzn.to/3SG2F3L
DESK - FlexiSpot E7 Pro amzn.to/3QVIWvS
VIDEO EDITING - Apple Final Cut Pro www.apple.com/final-cut-pro/
IMAGE EDITING - Adobe Photoshop amzn.to/3FZ7Ww0
AUDIO EDITING - Avid Pro Tools amzn.to/3QA5Wz7
NOTEBOOK - Leuchturm 1917 hardback amzn.to/47zonKX
PEN - Sakura Pigma archival pen Sakura Pigma archival pen amzn.to/47zz3cP
OSCILLOSCOPE - Hameg HM 203 alternatives amzn.to/47tWN1O
GROOMING - Philips 3000 nose hair trimmer amzn.to/40BdLJo
GROOMING - Nose plier amzn.to/41IOZaR
HAIR COLOUR - Just For Men amzn.to/475OgS1
HAIR CONDITIONER - TRESemmé Silky & Smooth amzn.to/41AdWFd
Disclaimer: Videos on this channel may include affiliate links and may feature software that has been received free of charge with an NFR (not for resale) licence, equipment that has been loaned or donated by a manufacturer or distributer, or equipment that has been bought for less than full retail price.

[@AudioMasterclass]

Haha, KZbin's AI context moderator is having a laugh I think. This video demonstrates that the Earth is genuinely flatter than an optical filter, if my math is correct. If you really do think that the Earth is flat, this video may not make you as happy as you think it will.

[@Semper_Fish]

The simple earth curve calculator is h=r*(1-cos a). Then it is upon the person to apply this in nature using the steps of the scientific method. This can be done at any large body of water at rest on a clear day looking at distant objects across the water and researching their distance from the observer to calculate the curve that should be obsructing the object. What will be observed is that there is no convexity of the water which lays flat and level and will never match the heliocentric required curve of h=r*(1-cos a), and you get to enjoy a nice day outside on the beach.

[@Guy776]

The earth has to be flat can you think of anything shaped that’s not somewhat flat ,round just doesn’t make sense to me I’ve always just figured it was flat

[@BJ-ag2za]

​@@Guy776 yeah globetards all brainwashed by the lgbtq elites George Soros covi jabbers! Flat earth is science😆 no cap homie trump 2024

[@BJ-ag2za]

If the earth was round then how do we not fall of the side of it huh🤔 keep eating what's been fed you sheep bahh bahhh bahhhh

[@VinceMenger]

@@Semper_Fish How dare you verify things for yourself... trust the "authorities" 😇. Oceans are level indeed, well, we call it sea level. The horizon is, well... horizontal too. A pleasure to read your valuable comment.

[@lamaludwig1470]

There are Flat-Earthers all around the globe!

[@montynorth3009]

Because they are smooth operators.

[@Deletirium]

​@@montynorth3009smoothbrains, more like

[@beats_audio_]

When I poured water on my balcony, it rolled towards the drain. From then on I came to know that the Earth is tilted.🤣

[@AbeRempel]

You said it wrong. The joke is "there are flat earthers all around the globe!" Just because something is "all around", doesn't make it s globe. There are squirrels all around my neighbourhood, doesn't make my neighbourhood a sphere.

[@michaelturner4457]

Flat-Earthers are found in every corner of the world.

[@billymack533]

I watch this channel late at night when I’m high so this one really baffled me as you can imagine

[@amcluesent]

(a) Some pasta is linguine (b) All linguine is not spaghetti (c) No spaghetti is pasta, hence all spaghetti is linguine. QED

[@hdrmadness2731]

lol KZbin placed a Flat Earth Context Blurb on the top of the video description - I guess the joke fell flat on the YT ai moderator.

[@AudioMasterclass]

One AI versus another.

[@StevieOnHisBike]

@@AudioMasterclass Me thinks that you're about to get a whole new audience now that YT's algorithm has you marked as a nutter. What's your take on QAnon? 🤣

[@AbeRempel]

@@StevieOnHisBike KZbin does not recommend flat earth videos to flat earthers anymore. KZbin was told to change their algorithm in court after the term "flat earth" was the #1 searched term on the platform in 2017. KZbin said it would start promoting more authoritative content and demoting conspiratorial content.

[@daviddunmore7076]

The only flat 'planet' I know of is Terry Pratchett's Discworld.

[@chriscasperson5927]

The Turtle Moves.

[@maidsandmuses]

The Dark Side of the Moon is also flat. And made of vinyl, not cheese.

[@AudioMasterclass]

Very amusing.

[@0zyris]

The earth is populated by Us, while the moon is populated by Them.

[@NathanOakley1980]

@@0zyrisWe have no idea what the moon is, you presumably think men travel there via a sky vacuum the gas we breathe isn’t filling in violation of the second law of thermodynamics. Gas fills space! With the exception of inferences of libration, we do not have a binocular vision to the moon, you have no idea what it is let alone its shape or form is! Don’t believe everything men tell you about the lights in the sky!

[@rstknives2423]

The Earth won't be flat if you stop using flat cables.

[@anamnesiser]

Three steps 1. Buy a zoom camera 2. Go and check 3. Think critically The truth can defend itself.

[@MrCheswickMusic]

How do the oceans of earth bend around a 1000 mph spinning ball?

[@anamnesiser]

@@MrCheswickMusic GRABBITY 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@MrCheswickMusic]

@@anamnesiser Ha ha, ahhh yes, the gravity card, the last refuge of someone with no answers or demonstrations, love it

[@anamnesiser]

@MrCheswickMusic the fantastical magical glue that holds the bullsh1t together 🤣

[@MrCheswickMusic]

@@anamnesiser Ha ha exactly mate

[@PaulHaussler-bs1qi]

British humor... Love it!!! Paul H. in Huntington Beach, CA, USA

[@sr3d-microphones]

Filters on the front of lenses, there is ‘optical’ glass, and ‘non’ optical glass, the cheap filters are the latter mostly. The 90’s was pretty good for optical glass

[@markallen9495]

Good fun! You definitely have the mind of a physicist! Two things I noted and liked from the video: From experience, it seems that generally it's a relatively *unknown* anecdote amongst the general public, that the original definition of the metre as defined by the SI (or rather, their predecessors emerging from revolutionary France) was such that the distance from the equator to the poles would be exactly 10,000 km, providing a universal length and a unit of length that would be "for all people, for all time". Once one learns this anecdote, they're unlikely to forget either it, or the circumference of the earth, whereas I imagine just memorising the radius of the earth is the sort of thing that just falls out of peoples' heads on a regular basis. Two, also from experience, when interacting with ChatGPT, you correctly point out that generally it's a good idea to have some sort of reasonable idea of what the answer should be beforehand, lest you be led astray. An enormous amount of my own queries have follow-up questions that go along the lines of "yes, but it isn't it the case that ________ is true/doesn't apply in this scenario", or with mock naïvety saying something like "oh, that's strange, I thought the answer would rely on the fact that ________", etc. and getting an "apology for my confusion" and a brand new answer that's far more plausible. Point being, that like so many advanced tools, ChatGPT is a godsend and a huge timesaver, but only when you *already* know the fundamentals, but very easy to get led down the garden path or completely stuck if you can't tell a plausible answer from nonsense. There are so analogous situations to this in the world that are fun to recognise, e.g. * Understanding computer architecture, low level programming languages and fundamental algorithms before graduating to the real world of high-level languages, automatic memory management, and solving every problem by downloading a library to do it for you. * Understanding calculus and linear algebra etc. before getting Mathematica to solve all these problems for you. * First developing a keen ear and a tactile connection to the music to allow beatmatching two records manually or playing in time, hearing when something is out of tune, or when a frequency in a track needs to be attenuated, rather than relying on SYNC buttons and automatic tools to do this for you, again at least at first. I call this the ladder principle, after Wittgenstein's statement at the end of the Tractatus that: "My propositions serve as elucidations in the following way: anyone who understands me eventually recognizes them as nonsensical, when he has used them-as steps-to climb beyond them. (He must, so to speak, throw away the ladder after he has climbed up it.) He must transcend these propositions, and then he will see the world aright."

[@AudioMasterclass]

Things would be a lot easier if the French had made the metre the same as the yard.

[@hinesification]

That was great! I've seen some of the major debunkers (like Dave dave McKeegan) do similar calculations, but the direct comparison with the Hoya filter is great. I bet Dave pics that up, since he's a pretty solid photographer.

[@beats_audio_]

When I poured water on my balcony, it rolled towards the drain. From then on I came to know that the Earth is tilted. 🤣

[@SteveWille]

‘SFEER’! THANK YOU! Did ChatGPT correct your pronunciation? If so, it maybe the only thing it got right.

[@michaeldeloatch7461]

My receiver's bass and treble knobs each have a notation "FLAT" at the very center. It can be no coincidence that same, very center is also at the top of the semicircle the sweep of the pots describes -- just like in your diagram at the earth's summit.

[@Astronomator]

This is such a delightful abomination of a video. Thank you for going to the trouble of putting it together. Also, warm regards from a fellow math/physics junkie. 😜

[@AudioMasterclass]

I get these crazy ideas in my sleep.

[@AuntieMaru]

I saw the title and I thought you had found a way to prove that the tonality of the earth is flat (lord knows singers seem to be flat more than they are sharp), but this was actually hilarious. I adore the way you troll the commentors. :) Thank you for putting a huge smile on my face today.

[@hamburgmusik]

If the intonation of the whole world was flat that would be the new standard pitch... 😉

[@merakrut]

I have a paint spray can; it says "Flat black". I wonder how flat this paint is compared to my friend's flat feet. I guess I have to do some calculations.

[@lukejones5272]

If you wanted to describe the earth's flatness as an engineering tolerance, you could use a 4000 mile radius (approximation) and the equation you used. You would get: two inches per mile, half inch per half mile, or eighth inch per quarter mile. Flat within an eighth of an inch per quarter mile is an *engineering marvel.*

[@vendelius]

No wonder I have been feeling a bit flat lately!.. Thank you Doctor..

[@suzi4723]

😂

[@wiggles7976]

A calculation like this is not difficult for me, so I'll do it. I don't know what the shape of just the blue part at 3:33 is, but let's call it a semihemisphere. Thus, a is the radius of the base of the semihemisphere, h is its height, r is the radius of the total sphere, and theta is the angle between the rounded tip of the semihemisphere and the sharp edge between the round part and the flat circle of the semihemisphere (vertex at sphere center). We have that sin(theta) = a/r, and in this case we can definitely use the small angle approximation and still be left with many digits of precision. Thus, theta = a/r. Now, since h + (r)cos(theta) = r, we have that h + (r)cos(a/r) = r, thus h = r(1 - cos(a/r)). The Taylor series for cos(x) is 1 - (x^2)/2 + (x^4)/24 - ..., but we still get many digits of precision by assuming cos(x) = 1 - (x^2)/2 due to x^4 being negligible compared to x^2. Thus, h = r(1 - (1 - 0.5(a/r)^2) = r(0.5)(a/r)^2 = (a^2)/(2r). This gets us all the precision we need, and thus h = ((50mm)^2)/(2*6371000000mm) = 0.196nm. ChatGPT was way off. This is much smaller than the irregularity of the light filter, assuming 380nm is correct. We can plug the exact value 6371000 - 6371000*cos(asin(0.05/6371000)) into wolfram alpha to see if I was lying about precision, and my approximation matched wolfram alpha's answer for 17 digits.

[@AudioMasterclass]

So is the Earth flat?

[@wiggles7976]

@@AudioMasterclass If the 50mm diameter filter cap is flat, and it has a maximum height difference of 380nm, then since a 50mm diameter level circle on the earth's surface has a maximum height difference of only 0.196nm, the earth is about 2000 times flatter that the filter cap. It does sound strange that assuming Earth to be a sphere leads to the conclusion Earth is flat, but we can't argue with numbers. It looks like Earth is flat.

[@AudioMasterclass]

@@wiggles7976 You're a believer.

[@donclingan3925]

Love it I heard recently if we got rid of flat sections of road and turned everywhere into hills n valleys it would cure transport he said a car gets 999 mpg and 30 mpg uphill and he worked out we would get 500+ mpg lol love the vid good break from serious audio

[@andrewsallee6044]

If we're going to have a flat earth, can it be carried around on a giant disc player rather than a giant tortoise? I suggest we watch out for the needle coming around... but what song is it playing?

[@AudioMasterclass]

Good question. And we have to remember it’s disc players all the way down.

[@philtaylor194]

Music of the Spheres?

[@andrewsallee6044]

@@philtaylor194More likely the sound track to "Saturday Night Fever"... you know... disc-o music.

[@Semper_Fish]

Allegedly, the turtle shell has 13 segments and coincides with the 13 lunar months.

[@rufusredneck3981]

Imagine if Harland & Wolff had built a cruise liner ten miles long, with a draft of nearly seven feet (for argument's sake), and it’s putting to sea for the first time. Assuming the globe model curve calculation of eight inches per mile squared, over ten miles the drop would be 66.66 (67) feet. Here’s the problem; what is the sea level profile of our luxury liner in the water? Are the bow and stern both 30 feet in the air or either one 60 feet in the air? Or do both remain floating and the sea water rises to 30 feet in the centre risking flooding of the lower decks? Now imagine if H&W had even more ambitious plans to build a ship 100 miles long; could you still call it a ship or is it now classed as a submarine? Welcome on-board the Lie’tanic! Entertaining read: 'Last of the True Deceivers' Alan Silvan

[@AudioMasterclass]

And the Earth being an oblate spheroid I’d imagine the numbers would be different whether travelling north-south or east-west.

[@humblestever24]

Eureka ! As someone once said.

[@rufusredneck3981]

@@AudioMasterclass You'll understand one day!

[@Ben-no4lz]

8 inches per mile squared is a Parabola & isn’t very accurate for calculated a globe. You want to know the degree of adjustment you get on a Sphere with a circumference of 24900 miles? 0.0143 degrees per mile.

[@rufusredneck3981]

@@Ben-no4lz works just fine for the distances we are discussing here and normally accepted for use by both sides of the argument. Water lies (sea) level; opposing pressure systems need physical separation; inverse square law of light disproves distant stars. Michelson-Morley found no movement but you will no doubt say it just disproves existence of the ether. We've heard it all before; try coming up with something original; David Weiss still offering three Bitcoin for one globe proof, go fill yer boots!

[@martineyles]

When asked what path an object thrown across the room would take in a university physics seminar (many years ago now), I made the mistake of giving the answer, "a parabola". I was immediately shot down by the lecturer as a flat earther. The correct anwser was in fact an ellipse, but most calculations we did at A level had used parabolas because the maths is simpler and the answer is close enough for most purposes.

[@AudioMasterclass]

I knew I was going to learn something.

[@NathanOakley1980]

@@AudioMasterclasswhere did you get that radius measurement? Spoiler, it was *measured* from a flat earth.

[@Semper_Fish]

8"/mile² is a parabola curve equation which is close to the sphere trig of h=r*(1-cos a) out to almost 500 miles where they deviate exponentially. Your professor used a shame tactic of superior intellect and failed to then apply these in nature using the scientific method to see if earth curve is observable to match either formula. The best place to do this is at any large body of water at rest on a clear day and it shows there is no convexity and will alao show other fascinating optical effects depending on the humidity/temp/light of day or other factors. Also, did he ever mention that accroding to heliocentrism the earth allegedly travels in an impossible ellipse orbit around the sun at an astonishing 66,616mph (mach 88)!?

[@chriscasperson5927]

Flerfs have already tried to use ChatGPT to prove the Earth is flat for debate and got caught and laughed at for it. Austin Witless was one. All they have to do is that the Earth is uncarbonated. Bingo, flat.

[@plenus7392]

Ohh, so flatness like on my carefully made equalization preset? Now i get it!

[@rienpost3145]

A decent frequency response is flat! (Desperately trying to drag this back into audio territory.)

[@DynamicAudio]

Haha...no matter if everyone agrees with you or not; but you do have a way with words which is unique...your sarcasm and cynicism is next level...love it.

[@csgamer6973]

I watch this channel when im on dmt. Great as always!

[@richardlister1737]

By far the best episode of inspired nonsense I’ve seen in a long time! For the avoidance of doubt, that was a compliment. Quod erat demonstrandum, indeed? My response: Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? Let’s hope someone guards the guards who guard your padded cell. Lest you escape 😉

[@AudioMasterclass]

Illigitimi nil carborundum.

[@richardlister1737]

@@AudioMasterclass haha! No, don’t.

[@logotrikes]

I asked a pilot what he thought on an international flight once. The earth is both round and flat, he said. From this I think he was saying is that the earth is flat but round in shape. Like a dinner plate say. Intellectually this sounds right to me. However from the first day of school as a five year old, I was introduced to the spinning globe on its stand. So the indoctrination began and has continued to this very day 71 years later. I believe the flat earth model and have for many years once I shook off the indoctrination....

[@Ben-no4lz]

So you believe a “Model” that is in direct opposition to actual observable reality.

[@logotrikes]

@@Ben-no4lz So tell me Ben, have you observed that the earth is actually round? Reference to it appearing curved out of airplane windows doesn't cut it. The glass is curved and gives the appearance of curvature. The pilots windows are flat by legislation and they get an entirely different view to a passenger. They get a flat horizon. There's plenty of vids on the interwebs showing the cockpit view of a flat horizon... Many experiments have been done which demonstrate the earth is flat, but none, as far as I'm aware of the opposite. "Movies" from NASA don't count because they've admitted that it's all photoshop. A pilot will tell you that pushing forward on the joystick all the time to hug the curve is erroneous. The attitude of a plane is nose up a few degrees all the way on level flight on any commercial or international flight. Nose up... No, I'm not convinced the earth is a ball except being told so for the past 76 of my years. I've seen nothing in all that time to convince me otherwise despite all the propaganda and brainwashing... Have you ever wondered why the so-called astronauts on the moon took hardly any pictures of Earth, when all they had to do was look up and click? They took plenty pictures of moon rocks and lunar dust and landscape. They went ballistic with their cameras, thousands and thousands of moon pictures, but nothing of the big blue ball just by looking up. The only extant pictures of Earth and so-called "Earth rise" are photoshopped or the equivalent of what was available in the 60's. The "famous" extremely contrived picture of an astronaut, a flag, and the Earth shows on closer inspection with the gamma turned up that the Earth was pasted into place. There is a clearly visible oblong surrounding this "Earth" which is a different shade to the rest of the sky. It's been added in. Not remotely questionable. So who is kidding who? The Webb telescope is manually controlled from Earth. Ever wondered why they don't turn the thing around and take magnificent pictures of Earth. But no, not one.They can do it, but haven't. Why not? Wouldn't the public love to see their home world in blazing colour? I would. But they won't because they're hiding something. Plenty of opportunities over the past 60 or so years. Sophisticated technology, but no pictures. I don't know the exact reason of course, but I could make a good guess... I don't have a horse in the race. The earth can be flat, square, a cube, rectangi-circuloid or banana-shaped for all I care. What I do like is truth, and I don't think we're getting it here...

[@Ben-no4lz]

@@logotrikes Yes I have, and so have you. Ever stood on a beach and watched clouds and ships come and go over the horizon? Ever seen the Round shadow of the earth on the moon during an Eclipse? Ever noticed how the higher you climb, the further you can see? Because climbing higher allows you to see Over the Curve of the horizon. Ever done long distance shooting? Because anyone who has will confirm that you have to account for the curvature and rotation of the earth if you want to hit your target. Ever noticed how the stars rotate Anti-clockwise in the Northern Hemisphere & Clockwise in the Southern Hemisphere? Literally only possible if the 2 hemispheres are on opposite side of a spinning globe. How do you explain timezones? Because if the earth was flat, sunrise/sunset would happen at the same time everywhere. Your pilot comment shows you have the same grasp of basic Geometry as the average 6 year old. On a sphere with a circumference of 24900 miles, do you know how much of a “nose down adjustment” a plane would need to make in order to maintain a fixed altitude?…..0.0143 degrees per mile. Which is so slight the changes in air pressure and elevator trim on the plane will do it automatically.

[@MrEjwheeler]

@@logotrikes "Many experiments have been done which demonstrate the earth is flat" Go on then, name just one.

[@logotrikes]

@@MrEjwheeler Really? Do I have to? The Bedford Level Experiment. Duplicated many times since its inception in 1838. Results are sometimes fuzzy though, so it's not a good example. Many laser experiments over vast inland lakes have shown some good results. Lasers being reflected by a mirror on the opposite shore. There was a recent KZbin clip where the guy did some measuring which showed two flat areas both in the US. One a lake and one across land distance. I wish I'd kept it or knew where it is. The lake one was very convincing, though I don't remember his measurement technique. Something to do with sonar or radar or something. I'll see if I can find it, and provided I don't lose you, I'll send a link.. Many land/sea observations using telephoto lens to show that a ship that has apparently gone over the curve is still there once zoomed in sufficiently. Now you don't see it, now you do. The Chicago skyline, where buildings should be seen as being underwater according to the geometry of what is it? 8 feet per mile squared. Seen from an opposite shoreline some 50 miles away, the foundations of these buildings spring back into view with a telephoto lens. Numerous examples exist... The Chicago example, a news anchor said "What you're seeing is a mirage" Mirages don't quite act that way sonny... With a skyline that is curving away from the viewer, the horizon should dip with it. But the horizon always stays at eye level. That's how you know you're on a flat plane... Theres a balloon experiment 100,000 feet or something, using a GoPro, with a straight lens not a fish eye lens. Rotated 360 degrees and a straight supporting rod acting as proof that the lens is not fish-eye, one sees a flat horizon 360 round. You also see the sun showing a localised hot spot on the clouds underneath, something a 93 million mile distant sun should not do, but that's for another conversation. Isaac Newton in his Principia Mathmatica wrote that we really don't know how far away the sun is and 93 million miles is as good a number as any other. Some good guesses have been made scientifically using parallax, but it's still not clear what the mean distance the sun is from Earth, assuming a ball. Recent declassified docs show the USAF and others conducted high altitude tests over the years "...assuming a flat non-rotating Earth." Maybe it was better to do the math this way rather than variables introduced by a rotating globe earth model I don't know, but it still begs the obvious question... I've given you several Mr EJ. Perhaps you'll return the compliment....?

[@user-rn2xp3mw5y]

So much sense. Where have you been all my life? Brilliant!

[@louismarina7225]

I used a spherical cow in a vacuum and the result was more accurate

[@markus_the_npc]

This must be the british wits ;) . Thanks for the chuckle.

[@nabman_]

It should be flat but it's not. It's rolled off at Arctica and has a slight boost at Antarctica.

[@ChihuaVid]

I feel like a Flatearther listenig to my - out of phase stereo baffle- with ports pointing to the sides, it is almost like a sin but I can hear a great stereo separation, no crosstalk and deep base... I would like to contact someone who would listen to it and tell me if they might have something to contribute to the knowledge of audio. I am a Mexican strugling to write in English

[@KenHinnenkamp]

If water curved over a globe, photos of still lakes reflecting mountains would be distorted. If you have ever been to a funny house with curved mirrors you will understand what I am talking about.

[@marxman00]

Are people slower closer to the pole/s ?

[@jasonkloos6348]

Yes. It takes them the same amount of time to complete a single rotation as someone at the equator despite having less distance to travel.

[@lukejones5272]

People are slow everywhere. But a blessed few think for themselves.

[@YilmazDurmaz]

"the earth is flat, but in nanometer scale" :) very nice! By the way, equinox is nearing, and it is the day flat-earth destroyed to the core. why? sun rises at exactly east (or say, 90 degree from north) everywhere on earth (not at the same time everywhere, that would be crazy. I meant its rise over a single meridian of course), which would cause "infinite suns" if they were true. One of many geometry things by which the sun destroys flat ideas.

[@__ZANE__]

time for your 6th jab grampa

[@__ZANE__]

@AnonYmous-yj9ibtell that to snoop's daughter and lebron's son

[@MrEjwheeler]

@@__ZANE__ tell that to Rob Skiba

[@__ZANE__]

@@MrEjwheelerLike Bob, Skiba was CIA. An actor/infiltrator. they off'd his character to try and convince truthers to get the jab.

[@MrEjwheeler]

@@__ZANE__ Might want to loosen your tinfoil hat a bit there.

[@MrCheswickMusic]

@@MrEjwheeler What jab are you up to now Einstein, is it 6 or 7, and are you still mixing & matching, or are you strictly a Pfizer fan?

[@krogers17]

I don't understand this video. Does someone think something else is true?

[@NathanOakley1980]

Yeah, many believe we live on a sphere model made using measurements of a flat earth. Most of the western world have this belief. It’s known as the “one world religion”, or “heliocentrism”. It was invented by the church and refined to better predict Easter using flat earth angle measurements to the stars…I’m guessing this is quite a shock?

[@cambee3070]

Why do you think that you live on a magical spinning waterball flying through outer space fantasy land with people walking on the sides of it?

[@JohnHazenhousen]

No one believes that.

[@cambee3070]

@@JohnHazenhousen oh then tell me more lol. What do you believe?

[@JohnHazenhousen]

@@cambee3070 …that I live on Planet Earth.

[@cambee3070]

@@JohnHazenhousen what shape is the earth you live on?

[@JohnHazenhousen]

@@cambee3070 The one I live on (the only one) is an oblate spheroid. There are some people nowadays who say it’s actually flat, but those people are either charlatans who don’t really believe it, or irredeemable morons.

[@acmelka]

Flat earthers need to buy telescope or watch a lunar eclipse.

[@MrCheswickMusic]

What has looking up at the sky got to do with measuring the ground you stand upon?

[@Zodiac4711]

@@MrCheswickMusic A lot.

[@MrCheswickMusic]

@@Zodiac4711 In that case then Einstein, look at the light on my ceiling and tell me how big mt back garden is

[@Zodiac4711]

@@MrCheswickMusic If your garden is big enough, why not? Sailors have measured their position on the sea by the stars for centuries.

[@MMID303]

It's funny people are actually arguing about it in the comments.

[@MarcellJjr]

the rainbow proves the firmament dome under water. The earth is flat and is on pillars

[@MrEjwheeler]

Sorry but "muh holy book" isn't evidence, and rainbows prove no such thing.

[@rabit818]

I want my music frequency response to be flat

[@NathanOakley1980]

My room acoustics are as flat as the earth! But seriously, I get +/- 6db in my heavily treated room from 25hz to 17Khz, sounds amazing! Also, earth is measured flat!

[@willdearden8373]

I'm guessing his pension is not meeting he needs.

[@DPSingh-px4xu]

Lack of flatness ...flatter than what ? Of all the habits I've contracted lately, listening to this man is pleasantly disturbing in a most dubious way as I cannot understand a word he says yet I feel better educated just having sat through this " master class".....thank you Sir !

[@montynorth3009]

A 100 foot pancake cooked in a 101 foot flat pan is flatter than the Earth. Hence, "As flat as a Pancake"

[@BadTrip69]

The whole Earth is just a CD.

[@suzi4723]

I've always known it..thx for confirming 🤪👍

[@fredashay]

But did you know that birds aren't real?

[@montynorth3009]

The Earth being flatter than this particular filter doesn't make the Earth flat. It just means that the filter flatness tolerances fall outside of the curvature of the Earth over the same 50mm diameter. The flatness of the Earth over the tiny length of 50mm flatters its true flatness.😄

[@shaylehirschman1748]

Fun through satire, as the premise doesn’t make sense. The formula for the variation of curve of a flat lens, provided here, makes no sense when applied to a globe. The height from the globe’s center to all points on the globe is the same height- the radius. You cannot prove a surface is flat by using a formula that cannot be applied to globes (r is too large in all dimensions relative to surface variation). But this would make a great April Fools joke!

[@robbedoeslegrand236]

Everybody knows the Earth is round. Just like a pancake. 🤔

[@NathanOakley1980]

Naa it’s measured flat using angles off a flat plane to the stars ✨ That’s why all the maps are flat. You can’t draw areas of equal altitude, or measure angles from a sphere, that’s just silly.

[@syanhc]

I find the title of these videos are click bait.

[@AudioMasterclass]

Try this - kzbin.info/www/bejne/manSg5aposdljdk

[@sidesup8286]

Did you run out of ideas? Ways to make fun of audiophiles who can hear differences that you can't; so let's make fun of them! Creativity is not something that grows on trees I guess. Flat is something you can photograph. Sound is "invisible"; fortunately for guys like you, who claim there is little to no differences, with things where there is improvement galore. Otherwise anyone could just take a pic and prove you wrong. Bad advice for audiophiles trying to get great sound. It's not hard to prove something is flat. If I recall, you can set something down on a flat surface and "magically" it will not roll off. Unless it's the top of Herman Munster's head, when he's not motionless. Al Lewis who played Grandpa "the Count," the "Vampire"and who sometimes changed into "The Vampire Bat", once ran for Mayor of New York. He lost because many people thought he was "too square."

[@user-ss6tk4ts2l]

I genuinely can't tell if your joking or not.

[@earthoid]

Since flatness is a human invention, I don't think much about it unless I'm involved in a human invented activity that requires it, like bowling perhaps. Regarding sound, if it sounds good to my non-flat logarithmic equipped ears then I'm happy. The earth? I see hills out my window, so not flat.

[@Hipyon]

😊 Of course it is flat I can here the difference 😂

[@noname-hl4vs]

🎉

[@SPINNINGMYWHEELS777]

didn't you know they have flattened the flat earth rhetoric with the bookend 'but may be convex in nature and a more complex structure we did not determine when it was flat"... 😂 I'm laughing because a major flat earth proselytizer stated this just last month without qualms

[@allenjgoldberg6960]

I really wish you’d ignore the idiots and devote yourself instead to we others who admire your experience and know-how. IMHO the best way to deal with the ranks of idiots is to offer them no attention at all.

[@Robert08010]

So... you better mean its "flat" as opposed to "sharp" or I'm outta here! I waste enough time on idiots who think the earth is flat.

[@nickdryad]

Do not watch if you have an Irony deficiency. Anyway, once you started talking in mathematical terms I reverted to my high school self and drew a guitar on the table.

[@AudioMasterclass]

A guitar? Could have been worse.

[@V2760]

3:05

[@ericdere]

(I stole this) Me: 70 % of the Earth is water, right? Scientist: Yes, that's true. Me: And all of this water is not carbonated, right? Scientist: Not sure were this is going, but OK Me: therefore the Earth is flat Scientist: Now wait just a minute you little shit...

[@AudioMasterclass]

That’s a good one. Even Phil might laugh.

[@NathanOakley1980]

Science deals with cause and effect relationships based on natural phenomena. Water is used to establish horizontal (that’s flat) planes of reference so we can build things as water finds and maintains level (that’s flat), we take an average of *sea level* to reference the heights of everything we have ever measured with respect to a flat earth….sea *level* Many globe claims use this flat earth proof to claim earth is a sphere, however we build on earth flat and use earth as a horizontal plane to navigate. Were you waiting for a punch line? You all got duped into a religion (globe was invented by the church) using measurements of the very thing you deny 😅 hilarious eh!

[@anamnesiser]

Chat Gpt the truth 🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@Gguitarist1]

I'm uncomfortably obsessed with the "American Gothic" painting on the wall behind you. What gives?

[@AudioMasterclass]

There's another painting to the right. Maybe you can obsess over that one too.

[@Gguitarist1]

I can't tell what the other one is. OK. So now I have to ask, why "American Gothic"? BTW, I very much enjoy your KZbin channel. Informative, Insightful, and Entertaining.

[@AudioMasterclass]

@@Gguitarist1 There is no reason other than I like it, like I like many artworks. As for the other one, I like that too. Oh yes, and they're both out of copyright so no problems there.

[@Gguitarist1]

👍✌️

[@markksargent]

Long Live Flat Earth

[@rufusredneck3981]

Well said Mark, distinct lack of non Google research here. It's a bit like those MagicEye pictures we used to stare at. Once you see it you cannot unsee it. David Weiss is still offering three Bitcoin for one globe proof; come on helio lovers, how hard can it be!

[@MrEjwheeler]

Mark demonstrating how irrefutably stupid he is by not even realising the video is taking the piss out of his dumb pizza planet.

[@MrEjwheeler]

@@rufusredneck3981 "David Weiss is still offering three Bitcoin for one globe proof" Has he put them into escrow yet, and set up an independent judge to determine the evidence? Of course he hasn't because he's nothing but a conman shilling a living through a useless app, being an oxygen thief too dumb to hold down a real job, like Mark here.

[@evasuser]

The Earth is flat.

[@MrEjwheeler]

Incorrect.

[@mr.c8033]

The earth is indeed, FLAT.@@MrEjwheeler

[@MrEjwheeler]

@@mr.c8033 Strange, since all the evidence says otherwise.

[@mr.c8033]

You have zero evidence. None. However, if you'd like absolute proof the earth is indeed flat, I will provide that for you, if you have any discernment at all. NASA says the earth has a curvature of 8" per mile squared. Be prepared to get your mind blowin' - if you dare. Which I doubt. .kzbin.info/www/bejne/qHOoYomYn92Debc @@MrEjwheeler

[@user-ub8ph5nt3e]

Flat earth in 5 mins video

[@andymouse]

Thats very odd, I was brought up with an old fashioned concepts called 'Manners' and I also find myself saying 'please' and 'thank you' or 'Ta' to ChatGPT as it feels uncomfortable to do otherwise. Of course there is no point at all to burn any bridges either.....cheers.

[@AudioMasterclass]

Pascal’s wager for the 21st century.

[@LickorishAllsorts]

You never know, nothing gets lost and our future overlords may trawl the records one day.

[@andymouse]

And if they do they will find out how very much I love them ! :)@@LickorishAllsorts

[@Meepsmusic63]

it cant be flat or people would be falling off the edge, omg, im loosing the will to live, you shouldn't even be needing to explain this @Audiomasterclass but when in kinda garden etc etc, I guess some people are in serious trouble with their reason. kudos

[@marxman00]

but.. there is no edge....!

[@peters7949]

@@marxman00Bono, Adam Clayton, and Larry Mullen Jr might take issue with that statement

[@marxman00]

@@peters7949 The edge is a ledge

[@r1p2m32]

Thanks, important and useful to know! Unfortunately none of the flat-earthers understand numbers or geometry.

[@NathanOakley1980]

Stereotype fallacy.

[@uchechukwuowiriwa2353]

the bible says that there is water above our sky/heaven (Genesis 1:6-8) it says that our sky is hard (Job37:18) the bible says that the sun leaves it's chambers and runs its course with joy, that the sun has moves on its circuit from one end of the heavens to the other (psalm 19). This exposition about the nature of the sun is explained in detail in Joshua 10:13; for the sun was moving its course when it stopped over gibeon for one full day. If you trust that God's word were not from the private interpretation of man but are indeed the inspired Word of God omniscient (most sovereign and most intelligent), if you believe God's word rather than NASA and godless college science then you will agree with me that the scriptures of the bible favor a geostationary earth with an enclosed geocentric cosmos rather than heliocentric globe earth copernican lie.

[@h.dejong2531]

Anyone can do simple experiments that prove Earth is a rotating sphere, and there's no dome above us.

[@RidgewayMountainhauser]

" If you trust that God's word were not from the private interpretation of man but are indeed the inspired Word of God omniscient (most sovereign and most intelligent)" that statement is the pinnacle of indoctrination. the bible is a collection of occasionally noble iron age goat herder myths.

[@humblestever24]

Next time you're going on a plane take a spirit level with you. You'll notice apart from when climbing or descending the spirit level shows a level surface. This is because the world is flat. Thanks for the change in topic. Audio is much simpler- it either sounds good or it doesn't.

[@GuardianSoulkeeper]

No, that would prove you had a smooth flight. Bring a set of jewellers scales instead. If you're travelling to a different latitude then the apparent weight of a test weight will change - getting lighter the closer you get to the equator. That effect is caused by the rotation of the Earth.

[@humblestever24]

@@GuardianSoulkeeper But you haven't factored in the pressurized cabin. Please think before posting.

[@JohnHazenhousen]

​@@humblestever24 I genuinely can't tell whether or not you're just pretending to be stupid.

[@Ben-no4lz]

You know why? Because the adjustment needed to maintain a fixed altitude is 0.0143 degrees per mile. Even a Laser level will struggle to detect such a small gradient.

[@MrCheswickMusic]

@@GuardianSoulkeeper Ha ha, in that case then, I'm going to buy all my gold at the equator and sell it up north for a profit, man, what an Idiot ha ha

[@stevengagnon4777]

Looking east from Two Rivers Wisconsin on the west side of Lake Michigan one can easily see the curve of the watery horizon. So it does not appear to be flat. I'm sure Betty and Debbie will agree.

[@AudioMasterclass]

As far as I can tell, Betty and Debbie seem to live in a universe that has only two dimensions. It’s all completely flat.

[@stevengagnon4777]

@@AudioMasterclass perhaps we should put forth an inquiry and ask them...they might surprise us.

[@NathanOakley1980]

meanwhile, the horizon (horizontal) is used in navigation to save lives at sea by giving sailors a way to establish a flat baseline to measure angles to stars off a flat plane. See how my flat earth proof comes with a life saving example! Does your example have a practical use or does it just affirm your already established globe faith?! Earth is mapped and navigated flat using angles only possible on a flat earth. “Does not appear” … almost as good as “measured flat with angles 📐 to save lives at sea” 🤣 There are no elevation changes in celestial navigation, the system is a 2d flat plane, also used in GPS, it’s called the “Mercator projection” made using a globe projection of the flat earth angles to Polaris measured off a flat earth for the latitude grid. All angles (flat earth required) are measured to the stars and run parallel to the flat earth at all elevations. The stars truly are amazing! 🤩

[@Semper_Fish]

​​@@stevengagnon4777You either made an observation on a day with an optical effect from humidity or some other factor, or you're making up what what you want to see in your mind. I too have made observations from MN, WI, MI, across another grat lake, Lake Superior, and there is no observable curve to be seen, and it certainly will not come close to the required earth curve claim of h=r*(1-cos a) of the heliocentric model that you don't know.

[@Semper_Fish]

That's quite the bent imagination.

[@evenblackercrow4476]

lol

[@evenblackercrow4476]

I don't know what that means, so I'm going to ignore it. My words to live by, too.

[@NathanOakley1980]

Thank you for being moderately respectful. I will extend you the same courtesy when I cover this video. Earth is flat. You can only get elevation angle measurements 📐 from a flat plane, you can not get an elevation angle measurement from a sphere earth. It’s game over. Elevation angle measurement proves flat earth. The world was mapped flat and it is build on flat. If you are actually serious about looking into this subject look into celestial navigation. It’s how the world was charted using an angle measurement 📐 to Polaris. This gives you latitude. The you do the same with the sun for longitude. Earth must be flat to use this system, precisely as we do! You get that *radius value* you used in your sphere assuming maths, by measuring the minimum elevation angle (flat earth required) to Polaris (equator) the celestial sphere has all been measured with respect to a flat earth, more specifically the equatorial plane. Earth is measured flat. All globe claims including yours have their genesis in flat earth measurements to the stars. I’ll cover your video on my show one day next week, with specific focus on where you got that “radius” value you assumed….it was measured from a flat earth as detailed above. If you want more homework, ask yourself why maps are flat then look at “areas of equal altitude”. The equator is one! We use it for latitude as we approach Polaris the angle 📐 (flat earth required) increases with respect to the horizon, a tool also used in navigation for establishing earth flat so we can use it for angle measurement. Perhaps in your globe world of radius values measured off a flat earth you get angles (two straight lines) off a curved surface 🤔 nope! Earth MUST BE and is measured flat, even for your globe beliefs. As I say, I’ll cover your video in the next few days. You’ll know as I’ll send a bunch of viewers to like and comment on this video. Hope you can check it out. I’ve been covering the subject on KZbin for 10 years.

[@NathanOakley1980]

You can also get that *radius value* you assume using Al-Biruni’s method where he measured the height of a mountain *using angles off a flat earth* once he has these flat earth angles he can figure out the height of the mountain with trig, then assuming the ground he just *measured flat* now curves under the mountain he can then derive the differential between *eye level* (flat earth required) and surface *level* (flat earth requirement also). Again as stated above, earth was *measured flat* to get the Radius value assumed in your maths. It’s the same *eye level* and *surface level* differential that give you your begging the question, proof of nothing perspective hijacking, earth curve calculators. They too infer earth curve using a *radius value* measurement taken from a flat earth angle 📐 and uses it to give you a tangent point horizon below surface level (flat earth required) using the difference between *eye level* (flat earth required) and surface level (flat earth requirement also). As you can tell I have 100s of ways to show earth is measured flat, and every globe claim ever, will also use these flat earth measurements. Hope this helps.

[@stevevender1154]

It was a joke. 🙄

[@Mr22brian22]

@@stevevender1154Not to us it’s not ?

[@stevevender1154]

@@Mr22brian22lol, good luck with that. 😂

[@Mr22brian22]

@@stevevender1154 I don’t need luck I just need proof and evidence which I have :)

[@Synthematix]

It is true, the earth is indeed flat, i popped out to get some milk on the weston-super-mare seafront and just as i crossed the road on the high street i fell off the edge, im now orbiting space at roughly 57mph

[@NathanOakley1980]

argumentum ad absurdum

[@NathanOakley1980]

Earth is measured flat using the stars ✨ You can only get elevation angle measurements to the stars 📐 from a flat plane, you can not get an elevation angle measurement from a sphere earth. It’s game over. Elevation angle measurement proves flat earth. ^^^ this is called “a rebuttal”.

[@Synthematix]

Rectum ad absurdum@@NathanOakley1980

[@Jazzaconda]

"You can lead a Flat Earther too Water, but ya sure as shit can't make them think"! Jazzaconda

[@GuardianSoulkeeper]

_You can take a flat earther to logic but you can't make them think._ is the one I prefer.

[@s_r_v]

Funny video well done 😂 seriously though I genuinely can't understand why people want to believe the earth is flat though...

[@MrCheswickMusic]

How come you can't observe, sense or measure yourself spinning @ 1000 mph?

[@jackmehoff5354]

@@MrCheswickMusic How about the fact they say the earth is going 500,000 miles per hour around the sun and moon... that's even harder to observe, sense or measure

[@VinceTomJones]

ohh ffs sake.... rant much?

[@MrCheswickMusic]

Stick to doing audio old timer, critical thinking & demonstrable reality isn't your forte

[@AudioMasterclass]

No thank you.

[@MrCheswickMusic]

@@AudioMasterclass Well, in that case then, seeing as you know so much about this subject, can you practically demonstrate to your audience how a standing body of water, such as an ocean, can physically adhere & bend around a 1000 mph spinning ball floating in a vacuum? A scaled down model will suffice Then, demonstrate to your audience how you can create pressure without some form of containment, EG: if the earth is a pressurised environment, then how is that pressure being created? Please practically demonstrate your quite frankly absurd claims & beliefs, I'll wait

[@AudioMasterclass]

Good golly gosh, you haven't understood the video at all. You should probably stay quiet in case anyone notices.

[@MrCheswickMusic]

@@AudioMasterclass I'll take that as a "No, I can't provide the practical real world demonstrations you asked for" then shall I? Typical, globe cult belief, all talk no action

[@MrEjwheeler]

@@MrCheswickMusic "can you practically demonstrate to your audience how a standing body of water, such as an ocean, can physically adhere & bend around a 1000 mph spinning ball floating in a vacuum? " Gravity. "A scaled down model will suffice" Sure, only problem is the first step would be to get rid of the earth, since it's this pesky mass attracting all the water to it. Of course you could just look at experiments done aboard the ISS, Chinese space station or zero-g flights that show water naturally forming into spheres. "If the earth is a pressurised environment, then how is that pressure being created?" Gravity. You never answered last time so I'll ask again: do you get some sort of perverse satisfaction from advertising your stupidity to the internet?

[@CraigPMiller]

The Earth isn’t flat it’s sharp! 😃😎

[@NathanOakley1980]

It’s measured flat.

[@CraigPMiller]

@@NathanOakley1980 Sorry, my comment was meant to be a musical 'flats and sharps' joke-pun.

[@tubefreeeasy]

At least ‘flat earthers’ will fall off the side of the earth because they don’t believe the cables will help them out.

[@tubefreeeasy]

Sorry, I do have a different interpretation of what a flat earther is. I like your precision of literacy.

[@NathanOakley1980]

@@tubefreeeasyit’s called a stereotype fallacy. How flat an oblate spheroid is, is oxymoronic!

[@ac81017]

I think you've got your wires crossed mate. What happened to AUDIO master class, we don't want Flat earth master class.

[@AudioMasterclass]

It’s my day off.

[@ac81017]

@@AudioMasterclass Fair enough 🙂

[@joso5554]

Silly and boring. Pointless and not fun for a second. Wrong assumptions lead to wrong conclusions. We already knew that.