Can 25 Liberal College Students Outsmart 1 Conservative? (feat. Charlie Kirk) | Surrounded

[@jubilee]

Want more? Subscribe👆

[@mxeditsz]

do a part two with different liberals this was entertaining asf

[@MalomP_Storyteller]

Just did 🎤

[@aidelizz]

subbed

[@weiposkha7428]

charlie kirk vs feminists

[@ravecutabodiu2544]

Charlie Kirk vs Dean Withers

[@mortal.lover_927]

The fact they applaud the most ignorant ones and vote out the ones actually trying to have a debate is insane

[@leahaderoju1411]

That’s because people no longer have the knowledge of a debate and insults have been replaced with the ability to actually have reasonable conversations or in this case a debate

[@jersydvl]

You're dealing with a death cult. There is no rationality when you are dealing with narcissistic cultists.

[@michaelscottintl]

Should have guaranteed 1-2 mins to talk

[@BeatsBySelim26]

You win a debate by getting the other person to agree with you. To do this you have to show some form of understanding towards the person you're debating with and liberals spend so much in their echo chambers that they immediately turn hostile towards any sort of nuance or stepping out of line with the popular opinion which is usually necessary to win a debate

[@ArctecGemini]

They say the government shouldn’t have a say over what women do with their bodies, but federalizing abortion is the government telling women what they can do with their bodies. What they really mean is the government should say “yes” instead of “no.”

[@Tj-es4fi]

Just because you don’t let someone talk, doesn’t mean you’re winning a debate.

[@worldseeker8246]

That's exactly what im saying

[@SergBurgerGG]

This is a very important thing to remember. If you are the one who sits down, ask questions, and listens all while not trying to stop the other person from telling their view, then you are the one learning, taking in information. you are winning!

[@booskz]

reall

[@dalefrancis9414]

The guy who I will refer to as "Mr.Unbearable" should see this comment

[@tylersyoung]

Agreed.

[@katcelestia]

i don’t care what side you’re on, personal attacks and rude behavior will never do your argument any justice. edit: yall need to heal fr

[@DonalRomano]

Spot on, sadly we award mediocrary in the form of humor and a lot of times this humor is deprivating.

[@nicholassok5797]

Usually what the woke liberals do when they feel like they’re losing a debate

[@colinbickford3470]

@@katcelestia which is what all these woke people did then cheered each other and clapped when they did. Constant interrupting and had no class or composure. I blame the parents.

[@shawnmonteiro8757]

@@jumpy2783 I don't see conservatives. I'm sorry but it's usually woke liberals. Maybe I have not seen enough but yes, rn 100 percent certified yappers are woke liberals. Again it's woke liberals not liberals. If they were liberals they wouldn't be hypocrites like the ones there in the video

[@candacekyle282]

​@@nicholassok5797always, every time.

[@eliomehanna1150]

Parker is the type of guy that has never been hit in the face before

[@im3369]

😂😂😂😂👍👍👍

[@EricaChavira-on4oz]

😂😂😂

[@leahnoeldickerson]

He did get hit in the face and then he started crying and made his daddy call their lawyer

[@yousa3705]

True

[@DogeUSA]

I would love to change that

[@stefanarran]

what really made me mad is when someone was willing to have a respectful debate and convo they’d vote them out

[@derp8575]

It's the Liberal way!

[@ironlordflash4346]

it’s because we’ve lost our ability to disagree with our stances on certain issues and topics to the point where if your on the opposing end then you’re supposed to be the enemy or someone who’s opinions are invalid

[@G2Tradez]

Describes the democratic party perfectly...

[@SpinningBirdFlip]

No I'm speaking no I'm speaking no I'm speaking

[@ReginaRajyashreeThapa]

​@@ironlordflash4346That is an American Liberal problem. Non American Liberals are commonly NOT like this

[@cathyallsup7731]

As soon as a real conversation starts, the red flags come out.

[@perturbedxtirade7428]

The real question is America getting taken advantage of to the tune of trillions by Israel.

[@LoofiSunic]

that sh1tty guy with glasses LOL, hes so annoying.

[@sadieklobchar4255]

i feel like people used the flags in the wrong way. most of the time people raised their flags when the speaker made a point that they wanted to add onto, rather than allowing the speaker to continue their point.

[@erikaLS305]

Pretty much all working together trying to make him look bad. It didn't work. 😂

[@Casperdcvd]

Shows you the amount of intelligence in the room...

[@kcsworldd]

The ones who actually knew how to debate were voted out when the real conversations started 😂

[@aceman0000099]

It's not that they were voted out specifically, it's that these people were riled up as well and really wanted to sit on the chair themselves.

[@Madison.13yr]

@@aceman0000099I get what you mean but normally the first few people that raised their flags never went to the chair 😭

[@aceman0000099]

@@Madison.13yr maybe they were undercover conservatives

[@chphotographix]

It's called leftism

[@catherinekarabas3276]

Of course. They were all taught by woke professors, who scream, cry and become violent when proven wrong, just like a toddler.

[@jasonclarkson3246]

The red herrings are insane. The topic is if college is a scam, and this guy went on to try and disprove an entire religion, and these kids are clapping for it. Makes ZERO sense.

[@YesterdaysDeadTodayOnlyExists]

Non of the unspeakable actions done in the name of religions makes any sense either religion cause a lot of untold sufferings and false teachings

[@JulNyarko-ve9bz]

​@@YesterdaysDeadTodayOnlyExistsSo it's not Religion that causes that. As Religion itself has been taken out of its original context and meaning.

[@3myst3ri3s3]

@@YesterdaysDeadTodayOnlyExistsThats incorrect humans are responsible for the suffering inflicted upon one another “in the name of religion” people made their own choices. Religion is used as a scapegoat for the atrocities committed.

[@espuchi5315]

@@YesterdaysDeadTodayOnlyExistscan we name some of these unspeakable acts? And also using something as a scapegoat doesn’t mean it sanctioned it if I say I do this in the name of my mom does that mean my mom made me do it?

[@theflyingfetus9405]

11 people vote for a new person, yet only 3 run for the chair. That says a lot.

[@kjolii]

sooo true!

[@Monkeyman-69-420]

Sadly yes

[@theliberaldestroyer3796]

Facts

[@Cherryblossoms110]

It does. And it's a shame. But more than anything, it shows that leadership isn't easy.

[@tony-cl-303]

“Someone else go speak for me, I don’t know the lines for this one!”

[@beeninthisfandomlongerthan9500]

The red flags are a great addition because it shows in real time how people will try to shut down a conversation when they don’t agree with the narrative

[@remora8829]

exactly. our minds are made up, we only want validation.

[@thomaschristenbury1143]

It's pure ignorance in real time! There's not one physics professor, there's no one there proving thev learned anything in college! They'll all have nervous breakdowns before it's over !

[@AlexSantos-yd1jq]

For real, didn’t even let some people finish their points.

[@sphinx3749]

true.

[@aymericdeascalon4590]

That's how the woke work,. They can't truly justify their positions and know full well that actually allowing an extended argument won't go their way. It's easier to repeat talking points as if they're fact and talk over anyone who says anything different.

[@hector463]

If you're not angry enough or condescending enough, the group votes you out. lol.

[@Idk.lol7689]

Yep. They vote out the people having an actual debate/conversation, but keep parker who is annoying loud, arrogant, fast loud talking.

[@idontevenknow741]

They’ll literally start clapping and laughing if you throw insults at him

[@vanessa.85]

There were some great conversations starting. They let Parker talk the most and and everyone else would roll their eyes at Charlie's statements. Says so much about most if those 25.

[@akhiltrc9708]

Rad lefties atm tend to measure arguments based on very personal emotions. Not rationality, not evidence, not any form of cause-ane-effect analysis. Of course, it's further exacerbated by the ego boost you get from mob mentality; and conformity bias. This gives them no reason to respect debate as a communicative tool. They're just there to virtue signal, at best.

[@kingbreck4648]

Says everything about their real intentions though. The people they kept in were not there to reason with anybody, they just wanted to fight Charlie, and Parker is a great example of that.

[@junab3743]

Parker: •pale •bad faith arguments •has never touched grass •not interested in arguing the actual topics •wants to monopolize the conversation

[@ACSuperstar]

Also: *super annoying *arrogant *condescending *completely resistant to other viewpoints *wants to argue for the sole purpose of being "correct"

[@avanillasodapopslice]

if ur pfp is u then u cannot be talking bby 🤨

[@lampasix]

We pale people do not claim him.

[@Shay56787]

@ACSuperstar Also *Creepy smile 😅

[@walkerscobell.n.taylors]

he literally needs to shut his face and touch grass

[@Damarismira]

The people who kept raising their flags and never actually debated are making me mad

[@cheeseyeet1009]

I was literally thinking the same thing

[@Lroexx]

LITERALLY OMFG IT'S PISSING ME OFF SSOOOOOOO BAD

[@MatthewMM414]

Why waste any of your energy letting people that mean absolutely nothing to your life effect how you feel or mood. This is all background noise and means nothing. These are all NPCs in our lives and should be used as entertainment only.

[@samsharif8303]

​@@MatthewMM414 This comment clearly made you react a certain way. Why would you react and leave a comment? Everyone are NPCs in our lives

[@sugarsaltspice]

ikr

[@BarkotBogale]

The idiots voting out the people actually making valid points is so irritating omgggg

[@Mr_Ago14]

Your team 😂

[@Addison_Ryan]

Omg Fr and most of them weren’t even participating in the debate

[@StanStuloviz]

there was not a single valid point of them

[@Sirous369Cyrus]

That is how the world works, that why we are here !

[@nameee6037]

realest

[@cloroxbleach7263]

I like how the ppl who were respectful and nice got voted off in like a min, just tells u the type of ppl in that room

[@random-eh2lv]

To add, they only cheered for emotional behavior lmao > Talk over charlie: cheer > Rude comment: cheer > Speak emotionally: cheer

[@azraelthecasul4882]

@@random-eh2lv Yup, that "what if your daughter" girl smh

[@shansen008]

@@random-eh2lv This is what happens when college faculties are filled with Angry marxists. You end up with college kids with no wisdom, and no logic. Everything is emotional gotchas.

[@Cimlite]

This is why Shorts and Tiktok is the main source of news for this generation.

[@grillinnchillin4009]

I think it mostly corellated with "groupthink" and how in-line with the progressive dogma one is. Once someone shows some nuance, they start getting flagged. I imagine those who are more thoughtful and original in their own positions are generally going to be more respectful as well, since they care more about moderation towards truth. Though, I did notice the flags aren't entirely bad since some people who were giving weak arguments or getting tied up over their own logic were getting flagged too. I'm only half way through, but it is annoying how Parker keeps finishing these debates without getting voted off even though it does feel like he's not being a totally fair or faithful interlocutor (even if he presumes he's being logically consistent).

[@ookamihime5122]

Remember everyone, this is the side of “love” and “kindness” and “acceptance”. And yet she said that about his child. Absolutely disgusting.

[@jaylaw.7660]

💯💯‼️

[@danyonvial843]

The comments of one woman in this video don’t necessarily reflect the entire “side” you’re referring to, other people in the room like dean are incredibly respectful. Also, just based on the viewpoints posited in these comments, the more conservative side isn’t very accepting of those who support abortion.

[@snekysnek1791]

you’re telling me the guy with glasses incessantly raises his flags for ninety minutes straight but never bothered to make his own views heard? coward behavior

[@YouDontKnow-that]

typical liberal behavior

[@gman955]

All cowards

[@rhi-y9x]

FR BRUH it pisses me off bc literally wtf

[@Drunkenknifingducks]

That’s what most liberals/ Wokes are brother it’s really sad…

[@ConanThebarbarian-n2e]

His face Pisses me off

[@Flynn_Rider543]

WHY ARE THEY PULLING THEIR FLAGS OUT WHEN THE CONVERSATION IS LITERALLY SO REAL

[@athenabbb]

Because they don’t like hearing the facts. It hurts their feelings 😢

[@Lastchance2030]

@@athenabbb True that!

[@SilentKnight37]

Any sort of pressure causes a crumple. It's very common, look out for it and you'll notice it. Almost all of them were very nervous wrecks to begin with, so when the conversation turned real, it was too much for these people to handle.

[@ArtIrae]

Because he´s speaking the truth. That means "he´s winning". They can´t have that...

[@kolbe6250]

They are scared of the truth. That's all.

[@trannongoble7722]

They should change it up. The first time that a personal attack is used, you're automatically disqualified.

[@dth91]

I would love to see that one the conversation would be shut down even quicker than they already are

[@ArbiSyarifudin]

upvote

[@pod8234]

I love that, wish we’d do that IRL

[@Lochlann13]

None of them would ever be able to speak.

[@bybritney]

Agreed

[@angelyntansiongco4048]

Maren is so triggered. She's like dumping her traumas on him.

[@EricaChavira-on4oz]

😂😂😂

[@ethelfleming4375]

First girl: I’m a catholic Everyone: 🚩🚩🚩🚩

[@chirayudesai793]

Yeah that was ridiculous, the moment you have a slightly different view, 🚩🚩🚩? Like you aren’t letting her debate in any sense…

[@MrMonchis04]

Yup being Catholic and a liberal is a an oxymoron.. She will have to chose soon

[@StrawberryMilk_Fan_Club]

​@@MrMonchis04why?

[@thebestSteven]

​@@MrMonchis04lmao. Wait until you learn human history. Edit: sorry, meant to say American history. My b

[@habana4286]

@@MrMonchis04 She's a wanna be catholic. Only applies what she likes and forgets what she doesn't.

[@samuelwittlinger7790]

People should have immunity of not being voted out for at least a minute, it would improve the format

[@courtney1727]

🌝

[@soraxas000treyu]

I like that but I think most were in there for a min or 2 but we onky got clips here and there

[@JohnathenStamos]

A-frikkin-men

[@aceman0000099]

It was edited for brevity

[@Keyser___Soze]

It would improve the format if you got rid of the whole format. Got rid of running to chair to beat others to talk, ending the debate/conversation/discussion in the middle of it because red flags were randomly raised. Basically the whole format was chalked

[@froggied5191]

I’m not liking the fact that literally anytime an individual is trying to debate RESPECTFULLY, they vote them out.

[@mechellestriler4079]

I saw that to. Hurting themselves & blind to their chains.

[@許碧玥-j2x]

"賀錦麗"只能說：背稿流利，辯論沒有邏輯，靠媒體撐場面！ (事實上就是，共和黨比較有人類道德觀，以人為本；民主黨比較沒有人類道德觀，不以人為本！) "賀錦麗"只能說：背稿流利，辯論沒有邏輯，靠媒體撐場面！ (美國民主黨執政更惨，已經成為無法控制的大怪獸了！) 例如：同性婚，廢死刑，邪淫(才有墮胎)，殺生，偷盜，妄言，綺語，兩舌，惡口，吸毒，搶劫，干涉各國内政，製造更多仇恨。(美國一年大約一千名警察死於槍下！) 佛陀大覺者預言，人類會越來越沒有道德心，放縱私欲的結果，就是世界越沈淪！ 中國人從古至今，受到聖賢的教導，保有一定的禮儀，善良。(只有少數個案，整體上還是好的。)

[@YanchiSo]

❤😊😊😊😊😊❤😊😊😊😊😊😊😊❤😊❤😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊​@@mechellestriler4079

[@junefousek3644]

Especially when they just didn’t like what Charlie was saying

[@marisolponce7959]

Yea because that’s how they are if you do not believe are agree with them they do not want to hear it.

[@bluebooknotes2519]

I'm a biologist. 25 years experience in teaching biology. I listened the first conversation, and so sad to hear a collage educated woman define a fetus or embryo in fetal and embryonic stages are not alive? This so ignorance , so embracing that shows our education system should be renovated. This is a elementary and middle school level knowledge: anything made of CELL is a LIVING THING! Parasite is a PATHOGEN! Harm to its HOST! Gosh! Literally elementary science subject! @Jubilee could you please add this information to the fact check to clarify the unfortunate statement of the young lady made beginning of the video.

[@lampasix]

Yeah, I could not believe my ears.

[@cameronl2116]

You've just outed yourself as not knowing a single thing about biology. Living things are MADE UP of cells, the reverse is not always true. A living thing (an organism) is defined as "a living being that has a cellular structure and that can independently perform all physiologic functions necessary for life." If your understanding of biology is applied, you would consider any organ, or even a white blood cell, to be "a living thing", which is obviously not true. Secondly, parasites are not pathogens. I don't know where you made this connection, but it's just a blatant lie. Pathogens are disease-causing, which is not an intrinsic quality of parasites. An example of a parasite is a barnacle. Although they don't cause disease, they can inhibit the movement of the host depending on the severity. A parasite is defined as "an organism that lives on or in a host organism and gets its food from or at the expense of its host." In the context it was used in this video, it is totally accurate. Just because a word has other meanings outside of a niche subject like biology, it does not imply the negative connotations associated with that other meaning. I really hope you're just lying about your credentials, because this is just terrible misinformation. *Also, a collage is an artwork.

[@lampasix]

@@cameronl2116 Cells, including white blood cells, are alive. So is a fetus. The relationship between a mother and a fetus is not parasitic, as in exchange for nutrients, the fetus ensures the continuation of the genetic line of the parents.

[@느긋탐험]

I think this year’s election shows that most people actually have common sense. The crazy ones just make a lot of noise…

[@Scags_LoL]

Watching people sprint to a chair, just to get 20 seconds to articulate a rushed point and get voted off so the next person can speak is such a flawed system

[@British_Tanker.]

It's their own friends voting each other off, it's funny 🤣

[@klaj6595]

It’s the only way they can feed the gen z entitlement 😂

[@DBQ42]

​@@British_Tanker. Its not a real discussion either. This is set up to be a lay up for that weirdo.

[@HANKHILLFORTXGOVERNOR]

​@@DBQ42 only a loser would say 25 v 1 is set up for charlie.

[@electriccheese5373]

@@HANKHILLFORTXGOVERNORit literally is. Not only is this his specialty, but they all got taken out before they could rebuttal 🤷🏻‍♂️

[@kk123.4]

*respectful debate begins* Students:🚩🚩🚩🚩 *nasty debate ends* Students: 🙌🏻👏🏻

[@MelekNovruzova-fl6fi]

yeah yeah , this is soooo sillyyyy

[@leocriadasapi]

*"you are nasty" * Students: 🤝🤝🤝

[@johntorres779]

Whole lotta potato brained people in that room

[@AD-yc5cb]

Not only clapping hands, but stupidly snapping fingers??😂😂😂😂

[@azrojenkins]

Those kids are whack

[@jacobdawes6405]

I would like to see the reverse of this as well, 25 conservative young people against 1 media ready liberal

[@yakety-yak]

As long as it's not parker.

[@NoGutsNoGlory-s7x]

Probably get that destiny guy to do it.

[@berkay6947]

Destiny. That would be a perfect chaos.

[@wendyyang2078]

Dani would be great

[@Vincetagram]

Honestly I’d like to see destiny do it

[@queenofhearts6584]

Parker thinks he’s cooking but the only thing that was cooked is his fried brain

[@81Xx_demonwhisperer_xX18]

Because he’s articulated and speaking fast they think he whippin a meal It’s really making the cells out my brain flutter away😭😭

[@adarshguptak]

Words per minute is NOT a measure of intelligence, and interrupting surely is a sign of intolerance.

[@britneyog9537]

💯

[@Alientcp]

Not neccessarily, sometimes you need to interrupt because they built an argument on a fallacy that has to be corrected before they build up (You can see this a lot where Matt Dillahunty lets them rant for 10 minutes when he was in the Atheist Experience). Sometimes they drift from the main point and what they are saying adds nothing to it. But in this case in particular, yes, the kid was annoying, and drifted from the topic.

[@sampatkalyan3103]

@Alientcp not really you can debunk their point after they are finished.

[@boobook3884]

Kamala

[@Hiaki1000]

intolerance? I don't think you know what that means lol

[@adamgibson473]

The black guy never spoke but the camera keeps panning to him whenever the topic is on black people😂😂😂

[@josephinetolentino4657]

HAHAHAHA

[@aceapolonio7284]

I remember that Key & Peele skit where the camera guy shows Jordan everytime Key mentioned gay lmao

[@derekiskindacrazy1541]

​@@aceapolonio7284lmao I know the one your talking about that's funny after 🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@MMovingTTarget]

Yep,

[@brick9233]

@@aceapolonio7284Bro facts 😂😂

[@mimimadhoun1814]

The concept of being voted out so quickly by your peers demonstrates the callous disregard of views that differ from your own.

[@JusticeCenter2733]

This is the problem with just wanting to talk and be heard instead of actually trying to listen more than a minute. These college kids are about as smart as a second grader.

[@calebroberts08]

That's a progressive values these days- complete intolerance of even having to hear another's views and that is taught by educators, it is not inherently human, western or American.

[@guysumpthin2974]

Pushing meds , pushing psyc, removing philosophy from higher education, promoting weed , promoting alcohol, promoting anger . What you see here is the result

[@donnellwilliams2015]

Well said 🤔.

[@flymyguy1841]

Well said

[@tedbeech-6245]

“I want to hear your points, I’m talking too much” Words none of the students have ever considered in their lives

[@rens3675]

But they are rushing because they know they have limited time and want all their points spread out before they get voted out, which they know will happen. Although I do agree they could use more insight as to when to talk and when to hold back and let their "opponent," the person they are debating with, get to say speak.

[@tedbeech-6245]

@ I said “in their lives”.

[@SmirkTheJerk]

Who gave Parker 2 monsters and a line of cocaine before this debate?

[@InvaderMedia420]

I don’t know, but I thank them for it.

[@harriso.3190]

Best KZbin comment I’ve ever seen

[@BelaDesouza_]

@@InvaderMedia420me too😭

[@fatmattaadams-oe3ns]

@@supdog12hi

[@DetachedK]

Parker without his mute button can't debate anyone as usual, his place is in his TikTok's not in a debate room

[@SableSunsets]

Whoever didn’t talk over Charlie and be completely disrespectful got red flagged. These people are ridiculous

[@ghostwmost4938]

Charlie talked over EVERYONE

[@tanusuafoa5849]

@@ghostwmost4938no he didn’t he was talking and got talked over and just kept talking very different

[@whisperissleepimgzzz]

didn’t charlie kept interrupting everyone?? he kept talking over them, you don’t win by interrupting, in a debate you listen respectfully, wait for your opponent to finish, and THEN start talking.

[@totallynelson]

@@whisperissleepimgzzzparker

[@ronpetersen2317]

@@ghostwmost4938 It was mostly back and forth.

[@zachw4200]

Today I learned that debates are 85% asking questions back and forth and only 15% answering each other's questions

[@tortol4847]

Its because people don't know how to have productive discussions anymore. They just ask questions over and over trying to catch someone in a trap so they can claim victory.

[@Arnelle_Art]

Aww you watched the presidential debate I see

[@_w_w_]

This is true for the liberal crowd. Charlie Kirk almost never get to finish his answer.

[@tuaneneel1842]

Also to just make ridiculous comparisons

[@Jaehyunzz]

Bc he always interrupts ppl.​@@_w_w_

[@slavetotheroad]

“No I’m speaking” and her three brain cells begin overheating

[@EricaChavira-on4oz]

Lmao 😂

[@LocalMingiStan]

and you SHOULDN'T speak

[@81Xx_demonwhisperer_xX18]

Like the intentions are there ..she just doesn’t know enough to get it out, and no one votes her it’s so irritating. 😭😭

[@MrMonny]

It annoys me how when a real conversation where they find a middle ground, everyone raises their red flags

[@b3sso862]

Yeah it’s because they don’t want to have a middle ground they think they will be correct only if they have a different or opposite point. Even if they agree they won’t admit it.

[@acceptibilation5506]

@@b3sso862I still don’t understand what the red flags mean

[@frankaliberti]

Children just want a podium to scream and call attention to themselves. It’s how Gen Z was raised.

[@Tenn-Tater]

The liberals hive mind.. squash truth and sensibility at all cost.. no rationale allowed . I have to scream my point of view first

[@dawg9991]

Yeah, they want to get their loser out and hopefully find someone who can interrupt Charlie better

[@phizzles]

Why do they vote out the ones that are genuinely trying to debate but leave the ones who get emotional and just scream??

[@AndrewSayer-rj6dv]

Because they are fighting against his views, whenever he creates a point that will affect the debate they vote the person out

[@lezardvy]

They aren't there willing to listen

[@Safwaan-s7k]

@@lezardvyexactly, I feel bad for these kids since they have no idea how much they’ve been brainwashed

[@billygregory1547]

Well i mean if u think about it most Liberals are just emotional fruit cakes by default 😂

[@JACK-wh6jl]

IT IS "JUST A SHOW" ... entertainment. no one is an official of knowledge, degree-held, to be a 100% accurate" judge" for the CONVERSATIONS, that is all either side has, is believed opinions, no physical proo: you did not see it written !!!f( not a paper written , these are not proof) or an AGENCIES POLICIES= those are chosen opinion choices not provable facts....( policies are for EMPLOYEES OF AN ORG OR BUSINESS, NOT APPLICABLE BY LAW ONTO ANYONE ELSE.: GENERAL SOCIETY. a-WHILE-BUNCH OF OPINION REPEATERS, NOT A SELF (truly) CRITICAL THINKING CONSTRUCTED, FORMED FACT THAT IS THE LEAST BIT PROVABLE. 80%OF STATED(believed truths): are actually false, misled beliefs that are lies, said enough times, the box of rtocks eventually, w/o any proof, believe the lie to be the factual, prove able fact of truth !!! ( but not provable)....

[@fiesta9282]

A debate between parker and Ben Shapiro would need to be played at .25 speed for anyone to be able to understand.

[@taylortiwari7118]

And zero valid points would be made on either end

[@nylens471]

I don’t think Parker would stand a chance against Ben with his extremely flawed arguments because Ben always says his religious beliefs are his own and not something to be pushed onto others.😂

[@commonsenseisdeadin2024]

@@nylens471 goodluck trying to get them to understand that...

[@TakenWasTakenYT]

Honestly the most well suited person to debate ben is probably some no name in highschool

[@shiningmudkip5687]

​@@taylortiwari7118yooo you can predict the future???? That's crazy bro

[@galactichand551]

The minute Charlie began answering Parker’s question Parker would start asking another question. Parker would speed run talking with big words to trick people into thinking he had anything to say.

[@trevormayfieldmusic]

The first girl got voted out because she didn’t agree with abortion. I actually wanted to hear what she had to say

[@elitewolfzz567]

She got voted out becuase the liberals can’t bear to listen to an opinion that’s not theirs

[@OsirusIrdia]

FROM THE RlVER TO THE SEE!!! 🩸🩸 I did not. The fact that she agreed to Kirk's crappy definitions made her stance logically inconsistent. Glad she got canned.

[@MasterChief968]

@@OsirusIrdia So we dont want to hear peoples opinions???? If u hate freedom of speech that bad i suggest you go to North korea

[@hxxxxxxxnxtd]

@@MasterChief968yea exactly. They didn’t wanna hear eachother speak they just wanted to speak 😂

[@hxxxxxxxnxtd]

@@MasterChief968crazy world we live in

[@Evan-nl4gt]

Parker ignored every single topic and just attacked his faith. Im not religious, but that was pathetic. What a POS.

[@BellaGrace622]

One of the most irritating brats there

[@henrymartin7843]

That's because charlie kurt sees himself as christian nationalists

[@sledgenft8856]

yea he annoyed me too, the interrupting argument, not debates needs an i got you moment for his tiki toki

[@AbimaelLopez-hz3qq]

I feel like I’ve seen Parker on tik tok

[@clownprince1313]

​@@AbimaelLopez-hz3qqI"m sorry you had to see that. 😐

[@dembabadem6808]

The concept of rushing the chair is weird. Do it by random choice.

[@T_oasty]

Yeah, that was a bit weird. Felt a little too aggressive for the type of video this is supposed to be.

[@me________]

Yep and then the person who gets to the chair first doesn’t know what they’re talking about or the convo goes nowhere like in the beginning with Naima

[@DrewTBG]

no. i like watching liberals try and exert energy. they don't do it often.

[@loveyalotz]

Why do they have others raise the flags for different speakers? Is it because they think the speaker sucks?

[@Saffron831]

@@DrewTBG Bruh, the healthiest states are all liberal leaning ones you dork.

[@Kel_sang_100]

Charlie Kirk deserves all the respect for being so calm and composed through out this heated debate w these woke kids who are here just to speak their opinion but never once listened to what the other person is saying.

[@jptrady1997]

Why is parker just attacking his religion and completely ignoring the main topic in every single instance he gets n the chair, not once but 3 times he changed the subject to attack charlies religion instead of addressing the topic

[@andrewmoriarty3359]

Because he wants to get Charlie pissed off to get him to say something out of pocket. I’ll give Parker this, he’s a smart kid yet very unwise and condescending.

[@thewanderingapprentice]

​@@andrewmoriarty3359id say he's intelligent but not smart.

[@josephfouche2006]

Because his main reasons are coming from his religion so you have to “attack” the basis to understand.

[@HowardKline-j4h]

Because he’s a worm that’s never been punched in his face or been in any other conflict beyond words. He’s the kind of person push someone to physicality, then call the cops once he’s knocked out

[@nateivm]

@@josephfouche2006 Exactly, if you're going to base your root knowledge on 'religious science' it's already flawed as it requires 'belief' without proof, the biggest argument ever.

[@pinkland5302]

why were people raising their flags so fast? this wasnt even a full discussion, people kept getting cut off

[@brahmas1685]

They wanted to end the conversation when it became clear their side was losing ground.

[@Jagged-Dust-Jacket]

@@brahmas1685I think that in some cases. But I also think people would make points, and then the people in the chairs would get an idea for a talking point. The video format does not encourage an actual conversation here, but instead a rapid fire of arguments.

[@brahmas1685]

@@Jagged-Dust-Jacket Yeah it's not ideal. But it is an interesting idea and fun to watch.

[@nmlobos]

Democrats 😂😂

[@his7ory]

Because if there was even remotely a hint of thinking differently than the mass thought, they wanted them gone

[@gwisscheese8891]

why did that one girl even come into the argument without the proper knowledge of what a C SECTION is

[@seyicrw]

fr tho

[@Hippyhop888]

She didn't know the full term cesarean section, but she understood when he said c section

[@charlessynowiec3876]

@@Hippyhop888her comment still stands. u come into a convo w bare minimum education and most the things she said get debunked w ease.

[@Randominternetvidz]

Yknow the funny thing is, I honestly believe she’s really smart. Majority of people can’t/wont admit their wrong or that they don’t know something in a argument

[@whois_arielle]

and these are the same people that can vote, smh

[@teletubby1008]

I’m a college student and I feel embarassed for these “American” college students for their lack of reality 🤦🏻‍♀️

[@soulla.in.2d]

They kept voting out the speaker way too early on, at least let them try to make a point...

[@DetachedK]

they had no arguments except attacking the person not the argument

[@MJ-mi9qc]

yeah like they voted out the 3rd guy who I'd say was actually winning the debate with the IUD point. Even Charlie admitted he was actually sweating a bit so not sure why he got voted off

[@TheShardFenix]

​@@MJ-mi9qc It's cause he was exactly parroting the current woke liberal thought process. Any deviation and it's bad.

[@joshmdmd]

@@MJ-mi9qc its because he said he agreed that abortion after 20 weeks or whatever shouldn't be legal.

[@KemiiLou]

Yeah it's really annoying. They should give them at least 1 minute and then after that time they can be voted out.

[@nolynnoel1032]

I hated the flags. It really disrupted the conversations.

[@davyroger3773]

Its much more beneficial to the participants to have to sit through opinions they don't want to hear and don't agree with, this should be a learning experience for everyone .

[@iroclife7909]

The flags mostly kept the less intelligent arguments from continuing to actual point

[@guysumpthin2974]

80 yrs ago , people this age were already married and had 2 or 3 of their 6 kids . But , people keep calling them kids , because they have no talents except anger, deceit.

[@s.r6331]

The conservative one is night and day. Lol

[@thegorn]

I really hate the rush to the chair. I mean we have the technology to randomly select people. It's a one-line script command. Weird.

[@ibnAmat]

The red flags are great examples to show just how *quick* the students were to “kick” each other out, if they said something wrong.

[@snow5962]

Absolutely, lol. Not towing the line.

[@danielasaro3918]

Not something “wrong” but different from their opinions. What happened to open minded individuals.

[@jimjames4348]

I noticed that too. Reflective of their society.

[@guysumpthin2974]

14% of the population should run over half of everything? thats not “inclusive” for the 86% ?

[@guysumpthin2974]

Remember the slaves were sacked and sold into slavery by other blacks (moors slave traders)

[@BDC_BRZY]

I find it funny how it’s 21 vs 1 and they still didn’t manage anything. When Charlie takes a second to think they think they won. Maybe they would be reasonable people if they took a second and thought

[@TeddyGrahams101]

Charlie Kirk: "Hello, nice to meet you." Liberal: "Hel-" *11/21 flags raised*

[@amiabears05]

😂😂😂😂

[@NoName-1239]

Liberals 🙄

[@angelusmortis3256]

@@NoName-1239 it happened the same with you republicans and Dean... its annoying... everyone just wants to have their chance at the spotlight

[@ForTEEHEE]

@@angelusmortis3256 for real the generalization of saying all liberals are like this genuinely makes me so mad when literally everyone does this regardless of views

[@YahwehsMessage]

@@angelusmortis3256 Libfart.

[@tellyomaw4]

The gentleman asking about iud is the best argument I heard so far. He was knowledgeable and emotionally stable during his time. I wish they let him continued.

[@GodAboveAaE]

He was being too polite and wasn't yelling insults, which showed the group that he wasn't a woke individual

[@microsoftpain]

They let Parker talk way more even though the dude never made a single argument with the intention of actually listening. The people that were there to listen and engage in conversation were quickly removed in favor of Parker.

[@kyamasmith]

Definitely polite, knowledgeable, and wrong lol

[@I_love_liberal_tears]

True, but its still pre conception

[@touhouenjoyer]

Almost seems like they voted him off to make Kirk stop talking lmfao.

[@pieyeh1]

One of my favorite things on this planet, is when people think that laughing at someones argument suddenly makes them correct

[@Spikethepurpledragon-gr6rn]

Frrr

[@GamingCaveman1989]

or laughing at information or words they dont know or understand to protect their ego and make the speaker look like the ignorant one

[@ferencszabo3504]

That's their last line of defense before their ego goes flat!

[@sethdavid2117]

Urban basketball people do that. It’s astounding to witness. 🤓

[@susan073054]

It's childish.

[@cakes.magick]

Why do they think being rude supports their points

[@luim0924]

This is not getting anywhere. It's more like bullying. I can talk faster and louder than you. Like, do they want to hear the other person, or do they just wanna be heard?

[@alexrice1870]

Most people talk to speak and be heard and too few people listen and respond.

[@eyesofascension8678]

​@@alexrice1870Conversations are not one directional. Just because someone is speaking doesn't mean that you're only supposed to listen and respond.

[@Seibertz]

That kid just wanted to think he was smarter 🤡

[@TH-1661]

sadly that's how 'debates' work nowadays

[@MG1K]

Fr

[@justincampos653]

Parker’s obsession with Christianity was ultimately his downfall. Completely avoided the main topic

[@lunchbox819]

He was there to get content for his TikTok not to debate. It's all about "gotcha" moments and not intelligent discourse

[@thewayofmusic100]

Parker = beta

[@WanHakimi-xc8ge]

The moment he defined what a woman is was the moment that he was yapping more than Charlie

[@skidmoda]

yeah, questions was about women and he keeps bring up Charlie's faith.

[@sethdavid2117]

Typical lost kid. 😂

[@ianr1985]

As an independent, watching this was torture. No one who had valid points was allowed to speak for longer than a few minutes. The moment the conversation started going it was cut short. This format definitely needs a rework

[@kathryncox7775]

Me too bruh. The arguments are BONKERS, the premise BONKERS

[@unknown_truckers]

Wokism at its finest, stop discussing points when they are no longer relevant to what you feel.

[@babypuppy9614]

Independent aka republican 😂

[@zacharyberg3711]

i would argue that there were many valid points. mostly from the krik side but also from the liberal side.

[@channingb5014]

@@babypuppy9614no an independent does not equal a republican. it is one who actually votes based on policies and not based on the box they have forced themselves into. plenty of independents vote democrat or for third parties. an independent is one that can actually think for themselves instead of letting the political party they “identify” with do all of the thinking for them. educate yourself.

[@melindakalos1279]

The young people completely destroyed this guy, every time they won the argument he would try to detract and try to confuse them. It didn’t work!!

[@81Xx_demonwhisperer_xX18]

The only person so far that I think put a valid argument up with him was dean

[@subtare3900]

I think everyone except the people who were automatically voted out destroyed Charlie, they just did the same thing he does in his arguments by being a prick ​@@81Xx_demonwhisperer_xX18

[@Skirraq]

I found it extremely annoying that people trying to have an actual debate get voted out, but people like Parker get to talk the most

[@boppy2sloppy]

Parker is a big TT guy that does hours and hours of debate and makes bank. He's annoying AF.

[@makananigrace]

@@Skirraq um no wtf i thought parker was great ?

[@MitchellMcBroom]

@@makananigraceof course you did, talking fast and with dialect doesn’t equate to making strong points….

[@cosmos7506]

@@makananigraceI’ve seen Parker’s debates on TikTok’s and I was really excited, but he was the only one who actually really annoyed me I’m ngl

[@jahthejestah]

​@@makananigrace😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 No. No.

[@danzig73079]

That one dude who just couldn’t stop bringing up religion when it had nothing to do with the subject was annoying. He’d make a terrible lawyer.

[@shinineagle23]

He didnt want a dialogue he wanted a monologue.

[@shawnyerdon4685]

@@shinineagle23 parker sucks

[@MidwestArtMan]

I want to ask him what "Christian" cult he grew up in. Nobody has that much animosity for something without it being personal.

[@angzmov]

Agreed

[@prncessdove]

It rlly was so annoying. He hates Christianity so much he can’t even stay on the actual topic.

[@maryeeuh]

everybody raising their flags on that one girl who barely had 2 mins to talk, they literally are so rude

[@kairavideshpande6508]

time stamp?

[@s.sampson9960]

​@@kairavideshpande6508 I got you: 8:39

[@bladehoon]

I checked the amount of time, she had 44 seconds to talk

[@musicman123ization]

Because she sucked

[@GetFukt33]

I mean, she didn’t even know what a cesarean section is lol

[@8Ellyelly]

Once Kirk talks about the realistic horror of abortion they flew those flags up

[@jennlackey8519]

It’s crazy how 25 people who share the same opinion, struggle to share the same opinion.

[@barbarafurst6772]

People can agree with a topic and desagree with other topic, it would be the same if as 25 conservatives

[@junefousek3644]

Being in one political party does not make you agree with every single point of that party

[@DuA-vs8bk]

It’s crazy how wtvr u commented here doesn’t make sense at all

[@bakedturkeys2132]

@@junefousek3644 Except when the Democrats vote the party line 99.9 percent of the time. They're mostly unified. When they held both the house and senate they passed almost all Democrat bills with 100 percent of the party

[@zoominmonkey278]

that’s not crazy… that’s called being an individual, everyone isnt just a carbon copy of eachother.

[@taekwondodude8]

"My name is-" *11 red flags, disqualified*

[@TidanOfc]

slim shady

[@ammosexual415]

😂😂

[@dmon44dav]

The flags go up as soon as their feelings get hurt. Just to stop the subject

[@Digger-Nick]

Seriously who designed this show

[@dmon44dav]

@@Digger-NickI think it was liberals and the comment section is not going the way they thought it would 🤔

[@richardhitchcock90]

This debate format sucks. The second you start getting a decent debate they vote the person out

[@samuelcroll344]

It is awful which is why it is hilarious.

[@wargodest]

Agreed, it's literally so unproductive and horrible 😂

[@muhammadmuizzuddin7328]

does this shows the real true of them. selfish.

[@djdb1214]

The less woke people speak the better

[@marleennijland4244]

Lefties don't like debates.

[@MammaPaula]

My baby is kicking be crazy at 24 weeks and at 13 weeks I felt his fluttering…no one can ever convince me that a baby in the womb is not a person. It’s a growing person. You’re a person at conception.

[@im3369]

❤❤❤

[@zh6232]

"I don't know what a c-section is". 11 flags immediately.

[@whyuu25]

She never said she doesn't know what a c section is, she just didn't know the full term. Still a valid reason to vote her out.

[@misfitm1457]

@@whyuu25 and he didn't know that a woman wouldn't be allowed to terminate her child if caesarian was an option for a safe delivery that'd save her life

[@sunnywells]

@@misfitm1457That is just false

[@pager4506]

@@misfitm1457 So its bad to save the life of the mother and the child?

[@squirtysquid]

She didn't deserve that

[@retropixels873]

I like how the first person was calm and reasonable, saying how her beliefs shouldn’t portray what the law says, yet got knocked off almost immediately. We definitely live in a society, my friends

[@southerncreationskitchen3392]

That's the first thing I knew how this would go when they didn't let her get past "I'm Catholic"

[@kyleliu8038]

Great debates from everyone but the tall girl who looks like offspring from Alien Romulus, Destiny, and a literal demon.

[@raelol1499]

Yeah, she was too far in the middle. They only want you in if you’re going to follow their hardcore 100% liberal view and insult/bully anyone who disagrees

[@Olsonbrother]

I thought that was crazy too. She was going about her argument rationally. Soon as religion is mentioned, she’s out.

[@boost91]

they all wanted to see a dunk from their tribe...thats what our conversations are being reduced to

[@Still_Eternal]

Charlie: College is a scam Parker: Church is a scam You can believe Church is a scam, but that’s not an argument for college not being a scam.

[@Sportsgirl-p5p]

Exactly what I was thinking. He can use that as an argument later, but it has nothing to do with the original argument.

[@netron66]

also there arent much church force you to pay to attend, and you can always go to other church, college need to pay college fund

[@janer5444]

Also, the LDS church isn’t even true Christianity, they are a cult.

[@athloner]

He's trying to poke holes in Charlie's logic being applied inconsistently, ie his argument is predicated on ideology instead of a objective view of the facts. It seems strange but it can be pretty effective against people like Charlie who are massive hypocrites and have very shallow reasoning for the positions they hold.

[@athloner]

​@@netron66no one is forced to go to college either

[@yareliesquivel2911]

Summarizing the whole video: No, they did not outsmart him.

[@brandongonzalez_]

Proverbs 18:2, “A fool takes no pleasure in understanding, but in expressing his own opinion” pretty much sums up all these jubilee videos

[@prod.6ixsar]

Amen

[@MiaKalov]

Amen

[@FYAHWEHL]

Amen

[@mihajlodimitrijevic5802]

Amin

[@mermaidswhimsy8601]

Exactly.

[@ily4death]

This series needs a moderator . Maren was able to make a disrespectful comment, other people were allowed to get worked up and emotional and argue on the sidelines and still be allowed to continue the video. People were not listening , just ready to argue. This series needs an on-site moderator. YOU NEED TO KICK THE DISRESPECTFUL INDIVIDUALS OUT THEY SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED TO CONTINUE THE REMAINDER OF THE VIDEO.

[@DChris3]

It was pretty wild how emotionally unhinged these kids are...and I'm just 5 minutes in 😂

[@youngdresbaby]

​@@DChris3 It gets worse.

[@ozzier9483]

Charlie called the guy Impotent how is that not a personal attack?

[@brucehwang9789]

He called the argument impotent...that is a different meaning​@@ozzier9483

[@TheGingering]

⁠@@DChris3for real. That one girl was throwing so much of a fit that she may as well just laid on the floor and started kicking her feet.

[@pappaflammyboi5799]

I think flagging has to have better defined rules. For example, if it's used more than 3 consecutive times, the flagger has to defend their views. Then, afterwards, they're prohibited from one round of debate interruption.

[@benjaminmedrano4493]

You'd have to track so many people and trust that they wouldn't screw the rules over. It wouldn't be efficient.

[@TheSixthRagnarok]

@@benjaminmedrano4493 have one person per person for tracking

[@GrowMasterGeneral]

That just means the people who didn't make it to the chair in time are going to constantly raise their flags. It bypasses the whole purpose of them rushing to the seat in the first place.

[@pappaflammyboi5799]

@@GrowMasterGeneral I didn't really care for the rush to the chair. That's not really what debate is about. Interesting, but inconsequential.

[@Chadrick2]

If it were the other way round the conservatives wouldn't do that.

[@JoeyAllen-wd1dj]

i've noticed that conservatives don't like to let people talk.

[@RocBrew]

It the only way they can control the narrative

[@ToolDudeAnonymous]

This is prime example of listening to respond rather than listening to learn…

[@Cyanpatagonus]

On both sides.

[@ToolDudeAnonymous]

@@Cyanpatagonus 100 percent

[@Eli-jw8mx]

Yes. I’m glad you commented this.

[@tonyrestaino7593]

I dont think I have ever seen, on this scale, this type of the arrogance of ignorance in my life.

[@keifer7813]

"I'M TALKING, I'M TALKING, I'M TALKING!"

[@iso.lulu.]

just because someone is interrupting , talking louder and faster doesn't mean they are winning the argument lol

[@Matty94]

Come on now, don't ruin their whole plan.

[@jsol_03]

Also if you’re actually winning the debate you don’t have to constantly say you’re winning the debate 😂😂😂

[@kayla9973]

so what Charlie Kirk does all the time?

[@Anita..]

Fr so annoying

[@Anita..]

@@kayla9973shut up I’m speaking

[@HLL_raiser_]

I don’t want Maren to be my Psychiatrist 😂

[@Galaxy-27david]

😂

[@U5hry]

bruh why are they waiving the flags for great arguments like wtf

[@AlphaSporeGaming]

What are the flags suppose to mean

[@Eric-kz9nc]

Cause people don't wanna hear the truth

[@elliehall7009]

I think part of it is because they can answer the question better. And/or they just want to be heard

[@nahyouremad]

@@AlphaSporeGamingit means they are voting to switch the person out of the chair

[@cielhunterzzzz]

@@nahyouremad correct but for example I feel like at this part 7:48 they raised the flags just to shut him up.

[@iHeartsxP]

This is actually painful to watch. When someone actually has a valid point red flags pop up.

[@thehightide2559]

i think it's refreshing... to realize that you aren't off as bad as some of us

[@jvon4375]

I know huh , even more painful to think how much their parents paid for their indoctrination

[@Sweep-u5k]

which ones had a valid point in your opinion..?

[@Slap4s]

@@Sweep-u5k that’s what I was trying to figure out

[@damianx1089]

This is evidence that the world is approaching the point of no return

[@annep.1905]

These kids didn't want a new speaker, they just wanted to shut Charlie up.

[@Benssaa]

noticed that aswell. when they don't agree with the point he's slowly making, they will try to stop him and refresh the debate

[@zandikhetwayo7444]

I don’t even like him but I agree😭😭😭

[@bv332fgh]

Yep. It's childish. They came into this seething with resentment, you can see it on their faces and in their behavior. They don't care about any of these points, they just wanted a chance to tear him apart.

[@KipringPayne]

Kids... that was being generous. Some of them were Toddlers.

[@nileverdeen3797]

Rightfully so. That monstrosity shouldnt be given a platform

[@lifeasclaren]

Charlie schooled all of them. They have no idea what the world is going to be like for them.

[@Joseuzumaki23]

People also still need to remember that social media has made people get way too comfortable with disrespecting people and not getting punched in the face for it

[@adellaopthofdella2385]

You think that being personally offended is a valid reason to hit someone?

[@henryhoofenburg]

@@adellaopthofdella2385 no but being insulted to your face is no matter who u are

[@piojo51]

Stole from Mike Tyson.

[@Joseuzumaki23]

@@piojo51 I meant to quote him lol

[@wblckaine1125]

@@adellaopthofdella2385 it is 😂 tf

[@jjberg48]

It's difficult to win a debate against a smart person. it's impossible to win a debate against an ignorant person.

[@Thankuforsubing]

Its like humans keep getting dumber each year. This is why i stay far away from them.

[@ESquaredSolutions]

It's impossible to win a debate when one side says "it's a YES or NO question", when it's clearly a nuanced or loaded question. The college kids were being pretty respectful IMO but it resulted in giving him too much control over the debate and allowing Gish Gallop techniques to take over.

[@j.t.8685]

@@ESquaredSolutions Respectful? They insulted him constantly lol

[@REPUNKSION]

@@j.t.8685 I dont think so

[@chrisprilloisebola]

@@ESquaredSolutions hahaha 'respectful' they sounded like a bunch of reddtors

[@mycrowpeenus4758]

Noticed that anyone that remotely agreed with Charlie instantly got red flags?

[@CatouMilou]

They're just children trying to aggravate the adult.

[@ihsv85]

Communism loves censorship

[@owen1-q1n]

Charlie is Zionist lol

[@p3tqrdv]

I wonder why 😑

[@charlesfoster2861]

Yeah because all this kids are not smart and can’t think for themselves. They just listen to their professors.

[@adamkovac1991]

That girl at 17:42, that is the worst person i have seen today on internet. Congrat!

[@ethansparrow9806]

Don’t rush the chair. Just make the circle smaller and give everyone three minutes.

[@Lord_Submissive]

Thank you this was weird to watch

[@RendezvousWithRama]

But rushing the chair is part of what creates the high-pressure atmosphere and makes this fun. If you want an ordinary debate, there are plenty of those.

[@vlogbrotherdave]

Buzzers!

[@bigjsquare1988]

I made a suggestion in the comments that maybe flags can't go up until the first 60-90 seconds of a new debate.

[@factualhatch]

Charlie already does that on his own channel and the results are shockingly similar

[@kylewhittle6565]

The rushing to the chair is so ridiculous..

[@Nada-od5nv]

yes especially since some are sitting on the back wont make it as fast as people who are sitting in front of him

[@Jess_lavender]

fr

[@slapshotLC]

thats part of his tactic of putting them off their game.

[@RepEvox]

@@slapshotLC thats cope and an excuse

[@Dylan-sq1wo]

Yeah they could’ve easily had a random name ballot

[@atd.5763]

I'm honestly amazed at how many people my age just... can't? have a civil discussion without scoffing, talking over, being emotional, and implementing irrelevant and personal attacks. Like how does that help get your point across?

[@prodxtendo]

There's no such thing as getting your point across in our generation anymore. These people think talking over, interrupting, being louder and more arrogant than the other automatically wins them the argument, which is just sad. None of them are ready to hear Charlie out.

[@jasl9987]

Totally.... im sure you would do so much better as you sit in your basement on your phone 🤣

[@ronaldodemakpore4338]

It’s sad honestly

[@atd.5763]

@@jasl9987 I actually founded a medical ethics discussion club at both my undergraduate institution and my medical school, so yes, I have 😬 and I did it because I witnessed this behavior and wanted to change it. We’ve had discussions on many of these topics between people from both sides without yelling, interrupting, and immaturity. It was actually amazing to see :) civil discourse is possible.

[@RaelynnBell]

@@jasl9987Well that was rude because there was nothing rude the person said but you did prove their point on people their age can’t have a civil discussion 😂

[@eemmanoelle]

i really enjoy when he debates with dean they both have a great way of explaining things. need a 1 on 1 debate with them.

[@jordantaylor6602]

I love that dean accidentally says unaliving like he’s on tiktok live 😭😭

[@gixymixer]

LMAOO you can take the boy out of tiktok but you cant take tiktok out of the boy 😭😭

[@Foos3yOW]

I NOTICED THAT OMGGG LMFAOOOO

[@highwire33]

And when Parker said P3dos 💀😭

[@aiba6540]

But you got it, what does this matter?

[@zining_90]

@@aiba6540 I didn't get it. What's unaliving?

[@number1techfan84]

The dude who kept bringing up religion is really bad at sticking to the point.

[@RJKYEG]

That's the guy who also was like, "Most people don't understand sentience..." That guy is in every intro philosophy class.

[@chelsacordeiro1187]

He’s a douche

[@sammytime2996]

Could it be safe to assume that he might have been turning his own argument set up against him. Flooding him with questions and pivoting the point to confuse his opponent? I don't think the guy who kept bring up religion was doing it because he had no better point. I think he was doing it to try and put the argument into the same format as the guy in the blue suite to show him his own issues in his argument set ups. But I dont know for sure what the young kid's goal wad arguing in that way so who knows for sure! Just an idea!

[@asterixandobelix195]

​@sammytime2996 Not only is your proposed idea nonsensical, but it also fails to address the context of the debate at hand.

[@AlottaDixonCider]

Loved hearing himself talk & thinks he’s the smartest guy to walk into any room

[@Whereisthelie]

Rude behavior is a clear sign of weak argument and you loose automatically.

[@turbotaro3714]

boo hoo

[@Blackredneck556]

@@turbotaro3714you’re one of the people he’s talking about sad to see

[@jamesmorrison7989]

@@turbotaro3714lol proving his point

[@tei_the_boy2367]

​@@turbotaro3714proving his point is crazy lil bro

[@turbotaro3714]

@@tei_the_boy2367 you just used an insult. Because of this you have a weak argument and have thus lost. I’ll take my medal by mail.

[@Zimmyzim-h7z]

Lord, please help Parker to have an encounter with you. Soften his heart and help him to see who you really are.

[@aprilmorrison9531]

The moment someone makes a personal attack/insults you've already lost the argument.

[@e4ter735]

I couldn't agree more

[@deb364]

lack of intelligence fr

[@tripdillon1074]

@@mrk1224rage bait 👍

[@khedsmann]

​@@mrk1224insult are a sign of low IQ, especially in a debate

[@conchathiestoledo9392]

@@mrk1224 what makes that true?

[@TheFrostASMR]

The red flags made me so mad because they weren’t even contributing

[@Chr1st_has_risen]

They are used to just watching it all on tv that’s why

[@spidery1700]

Yea they didn’t even let Lily speak even if she didn’t know what she was talking about

[@nolancho]

And sitting there thinking they're smart and know better. LOSERS. 😊

[@lottogaz8573]

I think everyone should have had an iq test before the show and they show it while they speak

[@karndorbad6536]

Welcome to everyone who voted Democrat

[@Rez7z]

I don't care for Kirk but anyone that thinks Parker did anything other than be an insufferable pseudo-intellectual is the problem with society.

[@Stickssupremer]

yes 👍

[@TopShut_]

Yup, was thinking the same thing when he had his turn lol

[@luketrojanowski3172]

His tactic was to ask a question and then talk over you while you answer and moving 2 ideas forward. Then claiming you didnt answer his question.

[@feezh]

Yea, this should be top comment lol. Parker is the worst type of person to engage in conversation with. Knowledgeable, but unable to have honest dialogue due to his inflated ego and desire to feel like he “won” the argument in any way possible.

[@MiaCiders]

Yall uncs couldn’t do any better

[@joshuagandia1602]

Parker sounds like the fast forwarded narrator at the end of pharmaceutical commercials.

[@lschild222]

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂