Judge Allows Anti-2A Groups To Sue YouTube For Mass Shootings

📲 Subscribe to @ColionNoir Here: bit.ly/3OTkrgB
The real people bringing this lawsuit against KZbin and other social media platforms are the anti-gun lobby.
They're just using the victims of the Buffalo mass shooting as a proxy in their culture war against the Second Amendment.
What they're trying to do is get firearm content removed from social media.
They're trying to do this by making firearm content on social media too much of a liability to allow on their platforms.
You do this buy filing ludicrous lawsuits like this one that forces social media sites to spend a ton of money fighting these types of cases to the point where it's just too expensive to deal with hassle of having firearm content on their platform.
Social media sites barely tolerate the gun community as is, whereas sites like TikTok have essentially banned firearm content on their platform
So it's not like this can't or hasn't already happened.
Do you think social media platforms should be held civilly accountable for the content on their platforms, or are you like me and see this as yet another way the anti-gun lobby is trying to destroy the Second Amendment from a different angle?
Before you comment on your thoughts, I want to let you know that my favorite in-ear Wireless Bluetooth hearing protection, the Blackouts, is available again
➡️ bit.ly/3wnUOPf
These incredible things allow you to listen to music, take phone calls, have active noise cancelation, and hear through technology that allows you to still hear the world around you all while still protecting your hearing with a certified NRR rating of 25,
Get them here before they're sold out again.
➡️ bit.ly/3wnUOPf
New 40oz 2A Tumblers, 2A Designs, Vacuum Insulated, With Handle & Straw
➡️ bit.ly/3w0RzNC
➡️ 2nd Amendment Embroidered Premium Hoodies
shop.mrcolionnoir.com/collect...
➡️ Join Our 2A Membership Club here on KZbin and get these perks:
/ @colionnoir
➡️ Join MY Exclusive 2A Advocacy Text List while AUTOMATICALLY being entered in our monthly 2A Giveaways
bit.ly/3FFLHJi
➡️ Get UnApologetically 2A Content In Short-Form On KZbin & Help Protect The Second Amendment
kzbin.info...
➡️ FREE BOOK - If I Only Had One Concealed Carry
www.mrcolionnoir.com/start-here/
Looking to help further our Pro Constitution, Pro 2A message, donate below:
www.MrColionNoir.com/donate/
UnApologetically 2A Content Content On Other Platforms:
Twitter - / mrcolionnoir
Instagram - / colionnoir
Facebook - / colionnoir
Gab - gab.com/ColionNoir
Truth Social- truthsocial.com/@ColionNoir
KZbin Shorts - kzbin.info?...
#2ANews #ColionNoir #ThePewPewLife #PewPewLife #SecondAmendment

[@kcf881]

Hey why not blame the gunman for what he did. This sounds like a cash grab to me.

[@petegregory517]

Always is.

[@HANKHILLFORTXGOVERNOR]

​​@@petegregory517 boosts stocks. Whats more is those who know, dont care.

[@LarryCurley]

Money has nothing to do with this. Do you think if KZbin and the others offered $100M to settle out of court they'd take it? Giffords doesn't want money, they want compliance. They want to bully the gun industry out of existence.

[@sardonicspartan9343]

Cash and power

[@rager_fox8147]

This is what I was going to say.

[@Scruffyman81]

Don't call them Anti-2A, call them anti-constitution.

[@HANKHILLFORTXGOVERNOR]

And if they know the history of the world theyd know they are endangering the USA' future..

[@HANKHILLFORTXGOVERNOR]

If those idividuals were aware of global history, they would understand the potential risks to the future of the USA with this action..

[@terrarecon]

Anti-American

[@toxicdragon323]

Yes on this, because how many amendments are they trying to attack? So far they're trying to violate the 1st, 2nd, 4th, 6th, and 8th amendments.

[@chuckdavis1323]

Both

[@bobmorgan1575]

Ludicrous. The judge that made this ruling should be censured, removed from the bench, and disbarred for LIFE.

[@anthonycristo376]

It is a possibility, however remote, that the judge is allowing this case to establish a Supreme Court precedent against such frivolous and baseless lawsuits. History has show when judges allowed cases that they knew were bunk to go forward just to set an example against it in the future.

[@BurnEveryTalmud]

So you don't like stronk independent black woman??

[@lovedadonald.]

​@@BurnEveryTalmudstronk !?!?!? LMAO !

[@Daves_Not_Here_Man_76]

funny way to spell set on fire

[@buddyreynolds8036]

​@@anthonycristo376Courts cost money and court costs must be paid. This is also Rico of the courts using lawfare.

[@burkena]

When can we sue.. for unfair denial of freedom of Speech.. and Censorship??

[@-o-dq7nd]

We can, but nobody does for whatever reason.

[@keithmoore5306]

that's what the tube really needs to answer for!!!!!

[@seraph6758]

I get censored everytime I explain something to a detail without vitriol or nasty behavior. Yt prefers acrimonious interactions and actively promotes "interaction" with bias and malice.

[@BurnEveryTalmud]

​@@seraph6758It is the exact opposite of how you just described. Jewish/Talmudic/satanic censorship algorithms target anyone getting too rambunctious.

[@madtabby66]

When you find a court that won’t laugh you out of the room.

[@coyote520]

Suing, banning, and blaming everyone and everything except the actual criminals.

[@xostler]

Criminals don’t have money

[@ElizabethF2222]

Exactly!! The 2nd Amendment says: "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED. Hear that anti gunners? Our 2nd Amendment protects our 1st. If we ever lose our 2nd, we will no longer be a free country. These disgusting groups won't blame the criminals only law abiding citizens.

[@ph1ni422]

Yes, and those criminals are the police creating a dangerous zoo around us by not doing or poorly doing their jobs. SIMPLE!!!!!!!

[@user-xf1ur3hu4z]

to be fair, it not just the parents, and kids that are at fault.... drug companies, sellin adderal and other drugs for adhd etcc need to be looked at how many of these mass shooters in the last 20 years have been on adhd drugs? and or other bs made up crap? like horone blockers or vice versa and so on. add on top of that. social media, facebook and stuff like it are horrible on kids. even adults..... i am pro gun. but if u follow the history of mass shootings u will see a pattern....... mid 90s is when all this bs breaks the patters..... and a whole new trend began. where mass shootings became a monthly, then weekly and now daily thing in america..... and it is bs. what has changed the last 25 years? internet, and more drugs in kids. along with ofc shitty parents. i 100% believe good parents will win out. but sadly parents are so wrothless. need to be held accountable for what their kids do

[@davidulmer9774]

@@xostler Really? Then how are all politicians millionaires? How is an AG that makes less than $200k worth $15 million in less than 2 years? The real criminals have money and they have it by cheating everyone else right in front of their faces because they know they can get away with it and you'll still vote for them.

[@christhomas9842]

When are they going to sue Hollywood ?

[@P_E_P_1966]

RIP Hollywood ;)

[@barneymm2204]

Oof!

[@Streetzsanchez]

Don't hold your breathe.

[@garretlewis4103]

Interesting….. I didn’t think about that.

[@SaleemBey]

Ugh huh?

[@MonkeyMind69]

If they succeeded in removing firearm content from KZbin, it would be the final nail in KZbin's coffin for me. As it already is, their censorship of comments is ludicrous.

[@keithmoore5306]

hell the tube is just looking for the excuse to do it anyway!!!!

[@mastathrash5609]

The tube wants you to live in a utopian bubble where you only see the bad that they want you to see and everything else is Just Smiles and fake good vibes. The only learning is pre-approved. And your freedom of speech is what they dictate. 🫤

[@davidswanson5669]

Is it them censoring comments, or is it the channel owner?

[@jordanbelander589]

​@@davidswanson566999% of the time, it's KZbin.

[@MonkeyMind69]

@@davidswanson5669 Supposedly it is an algorithm, though clearly Google (who owns KZbin) isn't doing anything to correct it. Take into account that Google has "buddied up" with certain govt. interests and "Three-letter" agencies, I have no trust that it is simply a byproduct of negligence.

[@redman112010]

I still don't understand how KZbin is responsible for murder?

[@carltonmetcalf-doetsch8999]

Better question, why is this group allowed to sue and YTs defense if just a platform not a moderator rejected for this case. When it was the opposite before when more conservative group tried to bring a case. I don't remember details bit I want to say for radical groups posting videos with calls to action on specific days and locations.

[@raymoneetillman3552]

So, it's not just the 2nd Amendment but technically the First Amendment

[@sway696]

It’s all of them. And people see it. That’s why they are 6 months behind with reporting record sales. Keep buying people! When everyone legally owns it will be impossible for them to reach their goals. Help open people’s eyes, and welcome to this community and encourage them to get involved. Then everyone will start realizing that they are responsible for themselves.

[@msimon6808]

actually the First Amendment

[@trumpetplyrmatt]

Exactly

[@fleatactical7390]

@@sway696 Keep spreading that mantra. I've been cheering on the record sales since the mid-2010's. 2020 and 2021 were glorious in that regard!

[@Tarlkov]

It's always been about the 1st Amendment. The 2nd Amendment is just in the way. You can not have the 1st Amendment without the 2nd Amendment, to defend it. Taking away the 2nd Amendment makes violating or dismantling the 1st Amendment a much easier task.

[@maw1186]

They blame everyone, but the criminals

[@itzcaseykc]

That's because the Liberals find a kindred soul with these criminals, so why would they want to blame them? 🤔😀🙄😒🤣😵‍💫😭🤑😬

[@brienperkins6062]

and everything...

[@williamjonas4013]

because they are the criminals

[@natmarelnam4871]

they ARE the criminals.

[@itzcaseykc]

Well, like the ole saying goes, "birds of a feather, flock together." (non-biblical) Criminals within political gangbangers approve of those in communities that perpetuate all sorts of crimes they wish they could do. Some however have and still walk the halls of Congress freely. Both have a biblically-based theme to them, even if they are not direct quotes. Proverbs 29:24; Romans 1:32; 1 Corinthians 15:33; Amos 3:3

[@revv45acp71]

Here’s a novel idea: hold criminals accountable for their actions and leave law abiding citizens alone!

[@Paniksaw211]

I never thought of that

[@RunNGunPhoto]

That "legal team" is fighting for a payday, not justice. They clearly don't know about the law or Section 230... They're dumb and should feel dumb.

[@SMichaelDeHart]

Can we sue Giffords when anyone is killed/injured in a 'No Gun Zone'??

[@jamesk9939]

We should!! It created the problem!! I don't know why the haven't!!

[@ForestTre]

That's a good idea this is something that needs to be done.

[@LarryCurley]

No. Because the judges won't allow it.

[@ForestTre]

@@LarryCurley but it's not up to them it's up to us they work for us not the other way around. So don't assume that all judges would be against us there are a lot of pro two-a judges that support the second amendment and I'm willing to bet there's more of them than not.

[@williebeamon3083]

Giffords the faker?

[@deputydillhole]

I guess we should start suing judges for repeat offenders.

[@sattymike0155]

Right

[@markmarkofkane8167]

And parole boards for releasing dangerous persons.

[@SoloRenegade]

yes!

[@KeithGan-wn2og]

DIFFENTLY , YOU GOT THAT RITE

[@lindap.p.1337]

Great idea.

[@theequalizer9154]

This is a New York judge, with two New York attorneys New York is the love to sue for anything state. As well, one of the most crooked states in the nation if not the most criminal outside of Washington DC.

[@Hannoshobazz_Neolmech]

Just lawyers keeping their paychecks coming.

[@doughoward7183]

Can we sue judges and D.A.'s who let criminals out of jail if they kill someone?

[@bjty5615]

Why can't we

[@bjty5615]

Why can't we???

[@phillipmarlowe0525]

No because of the criminal justice reform laws.

[@IronskullGM]

No due to Immunity...

[@HANKHILLFORTXGOVERNOR]

​​@@IronskullGM immunity like tenure should be predicated on exceptions.

[@blackmetalmatters9101]

Fight fire with fire. The family of Laken Riley should sue the Anti-2A groups for pushing for "gun-free zones", such as the campus of UGA where she was murdered, and their actions prevented Laken from protecting herself while out jogging.

[@HANKHILLFORTXGOVERNOR]

This should be pinned.

[@brucekopping1287]

awesome point

[@jimkinzer5155]

We need a conservative or common sense lawer to take this case. Or even an entire team to stop the stupidity.

[@HANKHILLFORTXGOVERNOR]

wouldnt this anti 2a groups governmental rights being heard and decided by the government; to infringe on others rights through corporation, be at the least semi fascistic?

[@spankthemonkey3201]

That isn't going to happen. So-called conservatives and 2A advocates are addicted to playing defense in a fetal position and refuse to fight fire with fire...

[@jsmaha]

Not just anti 2A, but also anti first amendment

[@tcschenks]

Why not sue Internet Service Providers, TV companies, and computer manufacturers then?

[@billbaggins7355]

So when are they gonna sue CNN, CNBC, FOX, ABC, NBC, and all the others for doing the exact same thing?

[@mikeb5712]

You know that will never happen.

[@TropicalDepression138]

Technically all of those outlets report the news with their own "personal" touch, however YT allows all sorts of creators to post all sorts of stuff but this father/daughter team doesn't have nearly as many lawyers or enough money to get into a legal match with big tech.

[@Csarci]

No, they are right. If they win then it sets the precedent all of news and Hollywood are sue-able for the same reason.

[@lindap.p.1337]

Look around the TV shows on these days. Rapes, murders, gangs, illegal drugs……..and on and on. The networks are more guilty than anyone and have been for probably 30 years.

[@jerrypeal653]

WTF is wrong with these Judges ?

[@unmasking7974]

they are gettin paid

[@michaelsolano7343]

It's what they get bribed for 🤷🏽‍♂️

[@P_E_P_1966]

EVERYTHING ! Hello SCOTUS ??!!

[@MaxWray111]

They aren't judges, they are activists.

[@TheJeffbarrett]

Activist judges use their power to corrupt the system.

[@OutWestRedDirt]

Those lawyers are NOT going after justice. What scum.

[@JAllen-vy6ig]

Absolutely RIDICULOUS!

[@jcmount1305]

This father, daughter team is fighting for justice...... nope..... fighting for a big settlement check.

[@user-pn7vx7gr9g]

What else would you expect from a couple Trifling ______.

[@daleprange4436]

Blame the local 6pm evening for showing and naming shooters

[@KH-rt3ef]

Ha, if anybody should be sued - it’s them!

[@fleatactical7390]

That's precisely the catalyst. And include CNN, because you know these shooters are watching that station non-stop.

[@userJohnSmith]

Can't do that, can't do this. KZbin should counter sue the shit out out of the family and law firm. Damn the optics, this cannot stand.

[@HANKHILLFORTXGOVERNOR]

wouldnt this anti 2a groups governmental rights being heard and decided by the government; to infringe on others rights through corporation, be at the least semi fascistic?

[@CarlosRamirez-wb7zu]

America has a gun culture problem. We really don't need guns in the cities. They cause way more harm than good.

[@davidruff4826]

I agree with you. I just had Facebook ban my account for 3 days because I shared a KZbin Video about a firearm. It was going over a pistol I never heard of. The ban said it was because I was selling a firearm, which I was not. It wasn't even my video. So yes, you're absolutely right. They barely tolerate firearm content as is. This lawsuit needs to be struck down.

[@none_o_ur_bidnis]

Sue the mainstream media, who else is making more people angrier?

[@jjnix9517]

Start suing the ATF, FBI, CIA and other agencies for losing their firearms/giving firearms to criminals.

[@AGFrontYT]

YES.

[@Xykaru]

Turns out the gun buybacks often result in the government either reselling the firearms as a whole, or parting them out, even though they 'claim' to intend to destroy them.

[@misterrobins7231]

EXACTLY!

[@danielduncan6806]

And don't forget Fast and Furious, where they actually bribed, coerced, and convinced legitimate gun sellers, licensed gun sellers, to sell guns to criminals. That one was Obama's baby.

[@Xykaru]

My reply got deleted. I was mentioning how shoot stick purchasebacks claim to intend to obliterate the boomsticks, but often outright resell or part out instead.

[@anonamouse5917]

When terrorists use the phone to coordinate an attack, victims families should sue AT&T.

[@groomerkiller3947]

We should sue anyone that votes democrat

[@larrykent196]

The pen and paper manufacturer too they sure used paper and pen to make their plan or manifesto.

[@HerculesEinstein]

apples and oranges, boy. they're not suing simply because he used it, but because of the negative effects of SM and how the algorithm is made to feed ever more radicalized versions of what you're already looking it. it's been well known for years.

[@DrDangerPuppy]

@@HerculesEinstein Chicken and rice. The others have already pointed out to you the ever more radicalized versions of writings put on paper or verbalized and/or shared over the phone. The algorithm people use to produce these negative effects through the use of their brains has been well known for years. Clearly paper, pen, the phone manufacturers & service providers should be sued. Are we about equal justice or not?

[@handtogocam]

😂

[@darkmugetsu6572]

Oh does that mean I can sue ABC, NBC, etc for constantly replaying mass shooting stories on their news ?

[@MadSUPANOVA]

Who just gave that judge a deposit in an off shore account? Got a yacht on order. Current system needs multiple outside groups watching them for corruption

[@kananisha]

Sue the judges and district attorneys for allowing the repeat offenders back out on the streets.

[@adamcuneo7189]

Yes, there is no reason why a repeat offender with a wrap sheet longer than my leg to be out of jail.

[@TomRolfson]

Outrageous! There's another 1A violation.

[@hyaenamagnus2131]

The gov is already trying to monitor KZbin viewers and online gamers. I'm not surprised.

[@rickosborne6521]

the problem with that claim is the 1A protects you from government limiting your speech. It means you can't be jailed for expressing dissenting or unpopular political opinions or anti-government rhetoric - something you can absolutely be imprisoned for in many countries. Social media companies own the platforms - they can decide precisely what kind of content is allowed on it - they already do - 1A doesn't apply because social media companies aren't the government.

[@HANKHILLFORTXGOVERNOR]

​@@rickosborne6521 wouldnt this anti 2a groups governmental rights being heard and decided by the government; to infringe on others rights through corporation, be at the least semi fascistic?

[@springerworks002]

The 1st amendment is no longer valid, so therefore cannot be violated.

[@xenosayain1506]

Thats what the sage harbor laws are for. It is a 1A issue. It's supposed to be the individual who posts being punished if someone violates the law, not the platform. It's gling to use governments moght to restrict speech on what is essentially the new public square ​@@rickosborne6521

[@TheCorybonuaf]

You know, it’s really wild how they will ridicule these platforms for allowing protected speech that is also about a protected rights to the point of filing lawsuits to try and bankrupt these individuals but yet heaven forbid they take down any type of trafficking ring, whether it’s humans or drugs or otherwise.

[@littledogsbigdogs1637]

I kind of wonder, how many of those 'Money' backers don't have an armed escort?

[@JesusGonzalez-ls5oz]

Why don't they go for news outlets for idolizing the shooter instead of covering more about the victims my opinion 😮😮

[@varanid9]

Because they don't care about justice, they just want to disarm us because, the more their corruption is becoming apparent, the more they're fearing us.

[@heathermillsphantomlimb9314]

100%. The FBI has concluded time and time again that the way the media covers these shootings absolutely encourages others to do the same. They specifically edit out people who run onto the field during baseball games to discourage anyone else from doing it, and yet they spend days on end plastering the faces of these losers who shoot places up all over the screen, then claim it’s somehow a guns fault. Media companies absolutely should be held liable when this nonsense occurs and they cover it like they do.

[@mrmors1344]

@@heathermillsphantomlimb9314 the UK has weekly "mass shootings" despite "no legal guns." they don't report on it for this very reason. add on top of that the mass stabbings "epidemic" they have which is also rarely widely reported, and you can see there is no "weapon control" that will make anyone "safer." The UK is now banning large kitchen knives and next few years expect "assault hammers" to be banned as well.

[@Steve-ev6vx]

​@@heathermillsphantomlimb9314reporting on it at all just feeds the social contagion, but if they didn't report on it at all people would be screaming conspiracy theories even louder than they are now.

[@arushreddi5419]

Source?​@@mrmors1344

[@JDew79]

They should NOT be heald accountable. What about having the criminals and our breakdown of society held accountable? We live in a world of "its always someone else's fault."

[@MrHamlet]

Lots of judges who need to be disbarred and punished.

[@n8saleen740]

So, attacking the 2nd amendment is not enough. Now, we’re going for the 1st amendment? These goofy people must really want to live in tyranny

[@jgrif7891]

How can you have lived through the past 5 years and not think people love being tyrannized?

[@Tarlkov]

The 1st Amendment is the goal. But before that can truly be attacked without backlash, they need to gut the 2nd Amendment, first. It is said, you can not have the 1st Amendment, without the 2nd. You need the 2nd Amendment to defend the 1st.

[@chesslover8829]

The Second Amendment protects the entire Constitution and the Republic itself.

[@OpusDogi]

@@Tarlkov The Democratic party has already attacked the First Amendment by having the Government lean on social media to censor content.

[@douglasferris]

WTF??? Blame everyone except the shooter. UNFN-Belivable!!

[@sslocke]

You live on the opposite side of the country from an incident? It's quite obviously YOUR fault.

[@gregaldr]

1A violation and additionally there is nothing about the platforms that encourages anything but speech, again 1A. Case should have been dismissed.

[@chrisgast]

Why aren't the criminals - the actual shooters - being held liable for these "mass shootings"? I still don't get that. These lawyers are being quite ridiculous going after the wrong people and continue to.

[@jeffcoler3104]

They are not suing for justice, they are suing for power to put the constitution on trial.

[@Scruffyman81]

Anti-constitution judges should be sued and placed in prison forever.

[@HANKHILLFORTXGOVERNOR]

If those idividuals were aware of global history, they would understand the potential risks to the future of the USA with this action..

[@HANKHILLFORTXGOVERNOR]

wouldnt this anti 2a groups governmental rights being heard and decided by the government; to infringe on others rights through corporation, be at the least semi fascistic?

[@Roark787]

Milktoast answer!

[@HANKHILLFORTXGOVERNOR]

​@@Roark787 yes, but ill defend to the end your rights to make it.

[@stevenkingma9228]

can you say money grab?! The next time I'm in a car accident I'll sue ford, GM, etc....they made a dangerous product!

[@jdove6883]

Clear violation of the 1st Amendment letting this lawsuit go through.

[@raymattson7928]

I'm about to sue the BMV for giving drivers license to drunk drivers.

[@chrissewell1608]

DMV? 🥴

[@mrmors1344]

@@chrissewell1608that or BMW for selling cars to drunk drivers as well?

[@Protopious]

​@@chrissewell1608it's the "Bureau of Motor Vehicles" for some people. Just like DWI and OWI is the same thing, but depends on where you're at

[@itzcaseykc]

@@Protopious This just goes to show ya how un-united America actually is. IMHO... every state should mirror the same rules/regulations as the rest of the states in America. Being united does not mean loosing one's identity or value. We need a complete overhaul of what acronyms and basic words mean in regard to American English. Too many kids, and even some adults, don't know and/or understand the basics of writing or speaking English sentences nowadays. If everyone who lives in America were able to exude just the basic skills of the three R's, people would then be capable of comprehensive communication. The problem is, schools today push kids through the system even when they haven't acquired the basics in order to survive out in the real world. These very same kids can't even read a newspaper's section of the Wanted listings to find a job.

[@Steve-ev6vx]

​@@itzcaseykcYeah well I was at the top of my class all through but struggle with decent employment because it's all still one big popularity contest. I run into people who couldn't read or do basic math with decent bank jobs making 100 k a year. It's all about popularity, not grades and ability.

[@dansemacabre6515]

This will be used to justify the removal of all gun-related content on YT. When that happens, I'll never watch YT again

[@mikeb5712]

For sure, look at how much stuff is banned or shadow banned on KZbin or any social media app.

[@chiraqkenny]

These lawyers are so disingenuous. they should sue the state for not allowing them to protect themselves

[@davidgreen7392]

Anyone NOT thinking like us, must be a bane on society.

[@Cowboycomando54]

Does this mean they can also sue Bic, Ticonderoga, and Georgia Pacific for manufacturing products that can be used to write down and spread extremist ideology that may or may not lead to a mass tragedy?

[@joeswanson537]

They want "gun safety" and then try to ban the cheapest most readily available way to learn how to actually be safe with firearms.

[@itzcaseykc]

...yeah, then they force the NY SAFE ACT on us in NY State to mutilate a rifle they find *scary* in order to make it safe. It doesn't. Liberals always say just the opposite of what something actually is.

[@thatguy9154]

They want guns for them not us.

[@itzcaseykc]

@@thatguy9154 Yeah, for sure. They also want to make an exorbitant amount of senseless laws for us peons/goyim which that they think they don't have to obey. Sounds just like the Scribes and Pharisees leading up to the time of Jesus; arrogant & tyrannical.

[@Mere-Lachaiselongue]

@@thatguy9154 Exactly. People don't seem to realize this.

[@mastathrash5609]

It's the same kind of folks that want to make ammo more expensive, so only the wealthy can have em. Not only that they want to restrict freedom of speech under the guise of protecting us from harm. It's how they want free speech, only if it suits those in power. That is their game

[@user-ch5wq4ig4q]

Something has to be done about all these judges making laws

[@itzcaseykc]

Definitely an aggressive attack on our 1st & 2A rights. I agree with you, Colion. Whatever we do, it is the result of a choice *we* make personally. Outside influencers, like social media platforms, are not liable for someone's actions UNLESS... a video was meant to incite violence towards another. However, it still comes back to a person's choice and intent no matter what they saw, heard, or read. Bottom line, the individual alone should be held responsible for *THEIR* actions and not some social platform.

[@RICARD01]

It's about time! I sued NASCAR for all my speeding tickets!

[@mattlanser1830]

I'm going to sue these companies for influencing my daughter to become Trans. With all the vids and tiktoks about that, it's become popular to declare yourself trans.

[@RICARD01]

@@mattlanser1830 BINGO!

[@DiveInThe305]

When can we sue anti-gun groups for removing Constitutional rights? Section 242 of Title 18 makes it a crime for a person acting under color of any law to willfully deprive a person of a right or privilege protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States. Just asking.

[@steventurley2963]

As soon as someone with the money files it. Or sets up a class action

[@Slinginghotlead007]

I don’t know, how about just enforce existing laws…..we better wake up and stop these people before every freedom is gone.

[@hauseradventures5278]

This is so insane, you can’t even make this crap up…

[@davidjernigan8161]

These lawyers should be disbarred as this a blatant civil rights violation

[@octmansuperstar1994]

🤦🏾‍♂️ how exactly is KZbin responsible for mass shootings?

[@HANKHILLFORTXGOVERNOR]

Little yellow bus people are in government..

[@octmansuperstar1994]

I definitely agree 🤦🏾‍♂️. More people die from hands and feet compared to firearms.

[@rodrigopereira3449]

I really don't give a flying F about the law It's ridiculous

[@Robyrob7771]

Sue an aluminum can manufacturer for the actions of a drunk person!

[@ij2750]

Judge is allowing frivolous lawsuits plain and simple.

[@fat_biscuits3928]

So why can't we sue Ford after getting into an accident? Let's just sue everything we don't agree upon... Ridiculous!

[@themightymutt5213]

That's exactly the example I use. Years ago, there was that asshole that intentionally drove his car into a crowd. I didn't hear anyone crying for the prosecution of the car's manufacturer!

[@zaqzilla1]

That's like suing a phone company because criminals use them.

[@tacky4237]

The Shooter was purely to get the foot in the door.

[@oldprophet]

How about GOA sue anti-gunners for lying and for being the cowards they are, and infringing on the 1st and 2nd ammendment!

[@robertlundquist5450]

The city owns the telephone poles. Hateful things get stapled to those poles. Is the city responsible? No. Hateful stuff gets “stapled” on KZbin. Same thing.

[@dashcammer4322]

Well that would be fair if youtube had no content moderation. Social media outfits like to play both sides of the "we are/we aren't" in control of what's on our platform. The best thing to come out of this is a USSC decision that they are or aren't in control of what's posted. If they are, then it's on their head what's on here. If they aren't, then they can't ban, shadowban, or demonetize ANYTHING or any channels.

[@JelaniJordan-uc9nt]

Now this is crazy. Blame the actual individuals that have been spewing the radical mess. Now we need to counter their bs by filing lawsuits against them

[@Killmonger47213]

So tired of this place 🤦🏾‍♂️🤦🏾‍♂️🤦🏾‍♂️

[@worldobserver3515]

Why don't they sue the government for not putting crazy people in an asylum?

[@carlmarks2199]

Criminals should be held accountable for their crimes.

[@chesslover8829]

Is that a novel legal theory?

[@KaoticReach1999]

I doubt the judge has ever even been on the internet, these old/ignorant judges make the most outlandish decisions after being manipulated by emotions instead of facts or commonsense.

[@davidsirmons]

That great moment when you see the guy who's relentlessly cruel to you and the guy who steals your lunch every day get in a fight.

[@bheckner]

Somebody got their feelings hurt so they grabbed a lawyer. F them!

[@DavidBrown-qh5cr]

Your not fighting for 'justice' if all your doing is trying to get a PAYCHECK

[@Gene4666]

This lawsuit and ruling pretty much opens the door for us all to sue the government on exactly the same merits!

[@Zangetsu1435]

Let’s sue car manufacturers because the “product by design” can potentially make it easier for potential mass shooters to carry out their crimes 🙄

[@KH-rt3ef]

Let’s sue teachers for making people literate, because the ability to read is at the root of all mass shootings

[@chuckdavis1323]

It's called a high velocity assault vehicle.

[@wwiiinplastic4712]

They are already being sued for making their cars too easy for criminals to steal.

[@kimberlygolden8182]

Total BS! You are responsible for your own actions. Speech of other's has nothing to do with what someone does.

[@jasonsofaking6342]

When a shooting/ crime occurs, the only person/people liable is the person/ people who participated in the shooting/ crime. I seems pretty simple.

[@jaredferguson7337]

When will these Crooked Politicians an Judges be held accountable for their actions? We see it every week on the News how that killer has been arrested 30 times for Numerous crimes an still running free.

[@StinkyGringo]

KZbin will ban all those channels now, eventually. Including this one. Watch

[@jimmysmith1400]

How in the world did these Anti constitution judges ever get in that position?

[@Jcdaking81]

blame the democrate party for putting them in place its not hard to find the person responsible, could also be a rhino who did it too ofc traitors are everywhere

[@gregaldr]

Sorros?, Bloomberg? Just guessing.

[@Protopious]

​@@gregaldrall of the above, and then some

[@blackrifle6736]

*At the Federal Level: Clinton, Soetoro and Biden judicial appointments confirmed by DemonRat majority Senates.*

[@-o-dq7nd]

They're democrat judges. We stupidly vote our judges in which leads to political bias. In other countries they are hired ... like a job.

[@PeppperOnii]

Damn, Brandon Herrera really spooked the establishment lol

[@francispitts9440]

Yet another clown show in our courts. Totally ridiculous.

[@MerkDolf]

Social-media should NOT be held accountable.

[@ThePresidentialTouch]

Let's not kid ourselves, this is in direct response to Brandon Herrera spanking their anti-gun stooge and helping turn the tide politically by using KZbin for advertising himself and 2nd Amendment discussion. Rumble and X are SUCH better platforms for America.

[@ForestTre]

Theres also dtube. Which doesn't believe censorship

[@Steve-ev6vx]

​@@ForestTrejewtube

[@ForestTre]

@@Steve-ev6vx no I meant Dtube

[@ForestTre]

What is rumble?

[@Steve-ev6vx]

@@ForestTre it's a conservative friendly streaming platform.

[@AlfredeBlome-df3sg]

Notice how people are so willing to sue anyone but the individuals responsible for the crime or accident ?

[@user-ce6pp6rs4n]

The victims should fight against the groups who make false lawsuits against everyone who does this. I hope the judge who actually gets this case will throw it because it has no merit at all.

[@scottsoares1168]

WTF Is happening in this country this is totally outlandish when is it gonna stop

[@Ravinofsin]

When 1776 repeats itself it will stop with Speech, privacy, action dictation are all things that lead to a repeat. If there are no actions to tell, show or protect people from what a government, company, organization then there is only 1 point of view seen by that stupidity and in the end will lead it back to that point and the only step is revolution because the things that kept stupid in check was the opposing opinions and protections those people had for themselves giving fear, determination, will to survive meaning once again so stupid is not left unchecked without logical opposition to stupid thought.

[@adamcuneo7189]

It only ends until the population puts a stop to it, which most likely will never happen sadly.

[@RoyalWulffDry]

@@adamcuneo7189Especially since they want to grant citizenship to the 20 million illegals here so they will always win a election.

[@VEEGUS324]

Never gonna stop.

[@barnabasmurphy8496]

I agree with you, is not going to stop. There will be gang problems and psychopathic killers out there that go to the black markets that sells illegal guns and illegal assault rifles.

[@DingleBlaster]

I'm going to sue the shopping mall for making convincing ads to make me spend. I'm broke because of this.

[@georgeofthejungle4497]

That judge, as well as that "legal team" need to be disbarred

[@zacharyfett2491]

“No Constitutional Amendment is absolute”. They’ll never stop.

[@chiapets2594]

And we should be able to sue this judge and anyone that is attempting this. What a joke this system is

[@razgriz1258]

Is this an April fools joke?

[@ratagris21]

Everything the Democrats do is an April Fool's joke.

[@PacificN.W.]

Social media should counter-sue for frivolous suit. Court cost and damages should be awarded.

[@overseerslogs]

This isn't just an attack on the 2nd Amendment this is an attack on the 1st Amendment. The scale of this issue is much larger now

[@robbiewiedrick2479]

If that is the line of thinking, then politicians and judges should be held accountable for repeadlitly releasing violent criminals from custody.

[@natmarelnam4871]

That's what it will come to, extra-judicially because our legal system doesn't know how to solve anything.

[@garyokie4893]

When are the gun rights groups going to start suing the anti-gun groups? Especially in areas where the laws are so strict that people can’t protect themselves. Every time someone gets hurt or killed and they don’t have a gun these anti-gun groups should be getting sued by everyone and their brother. We have to play the same game. Restrictive gun states should be sued also.