Judge Faith - Over the Hedge; Gone to the Dogs (Season 1: Episode #37)

Over the Hedge; Gone to the Dogs - A woman claims she is in emotional distress after her neighbor cut down her hedges without permission; A woman was attacked by her neighbor's dog and claims she has avoided paying the hospital bills
Stream every Judge Faith episode on Amazon Prime.
Judge Faith Season 1: www.amazon.com...
Judge Faith Season 2: www.amazon.com...
Judge Faith Season 3: www.amazon.com...

[@dymond4207]

I think the lady in the first case was mad because she lost her husband a year ago, she probably didn't want anything in her life to change and those bushes were apart of those memories.

[@janedeauxxx]

Plus she probably liked the sense of security that separation between her space and his the bushes provided. The privacy statement she said stood out to me, sounds a lot like my mom who was scarred by a peeping Tom growing up

[@michaelbar-dov214]

10% what happens to you and 90% how you respond? Fantastic!

[@lbu9542]

I thought the same thing. Very wise statement.

[@malaysiarobinson6757]

No one gonna talk about the woman in the front row with blonde hair falling asleep 💀 11:26

[@lonnekejansen2306]

Hope that will never happen to me, I snore ... 😂😂

[@Randompotatoes-qs7bm]

Malaysia Robinson that would be me after listening to 2 adults talk about bushes for probably an hour .

[@tichinasherrod8804]

The guy on the end of the second row too behind the defendant 😂😂😂

[@mimikinmiracle83]

Poor thing was really fighting it too LMAO!

[@mikilacunningham6259]

I think that if they get paying them to sit there, they should be put in the back row from now on

[@hey2930]

Edward Scissorhands 😂😂💀

[@ladyg3nius]

The older folk can speak civilly to each other, no attitude

[@Randompotatoes-qs7bm]

ladyg3nius spend a day in a nursing home and see how true that still is 😂.

[@latarareed7321]

YES ITS ALWAYS REFRESHING TO SEE THEM SPEAK CIVILY

[@omgitstee9035]

She said when we turned to dust

[@janedeauxxx]

I love that lady

[@amberpeach6948]

OMG!! Its Tee LMBO😂

[@nancyverite1564]

Shout out to the announcer for being able to say the defendants name in case #2. 12:26

[@_alycial18]

😆😆

[@fantanuradin9574]

then he called plaintiff KIM

[@highlander666]

It was impressive

[@xXLilSmurthXx]

LMAO!!! Saw your comment and was waiting for the second case!

[@JB-uy9ts]

He nail it ... I am black an barely can pronounce.. my own name

[@devdasrai]

The way the narrator said the defendant’s name in the second case 😭😂 I cannot

[@ebonydyer9284]

The second case the defendant was not in any disagreement of the payment she just wanted to see the actual bill before making a payment which is the right way to do before dishing out any money. I think the judge was trying to rush that case cuz she wasn't even trying to hear the defendant. Which was a little unfair because the lady wasn't even rude she couldn't even finish saying what she was trying to say but hey it's Judge Faith courtroom and I do love and respect her.

[@davionalexander147]

Well in the case she mention to the lady she was going to have to pay way before she ruled it.. She was just hearing the story out and both sides.. But the other lady kept agreeing to pay so it was really no need to keep letting her talk... Thts all i think it was.

[@tiasway]

@@davionalexander147 when exactly did she hear both of their sides of the story she kept cutting the lady with the dark hair off every time she spoke

[@kaylaj490]

In my opinion, she ruled fairly, there was literally nothing of any relevance that lady could've added to her defense. 1. She admitted to being negligent by leaving the door open and her dog got out, therefore at that moment she is 100% at fault. 2. She said that she never disagreed to pay but wanted to see the bills herself because she thought that the bill amount was inaccurate, so Judge Faith let her physically see that the bills were legit. 3. She was not there to witness the accident, so everything she said was indeed speculation and assumptions based on her opinion... Easy ruling, case closed, no need to drag it out unnecessarily.

[@lisaswarn9838]

The first case...I hope they are good.

[@guguonpoint8668]

1st case, love your neighbor. Am Against suing ones neighbor, things can be resolved amicably.according to this defendant he tried to resolve the issue. Besides that the man has been trimming the bushes for years. LOVE JUDGE FAITHS JUDGEMENT ON THIS CASE.

[@mariooiram3390]

Those free edge trims are over

[@dashisan91]

Old people can be so cute.

[@Dolly351]

DARCIETHEMOM like babies all over again

[@ELIZABETH-rw8rn]

🤣🤣😋

[@Michelle-pn9xt]

What is the point of making an ignorant comment like that?

[@dawnae75]

As a owner of a large dog that looks like a small dog bite. But since she admitted her dog escaped she has the burden of proof. I tried to stop my cat and a neighbor cat from fighting (bad idea..I was 10yrs old) and both cats scratched the mess out of me so I understand what the defendant was trying to say.

[@quanita9350]

Black lady in the first episode is a pretty older lady

[@mortalwombat78]

When you're older you should be wise and calm and respectful. If you're gonna be pretty at least have those qualities too.

[@therealestmcc0y]

Always at least one simp in these comments.

[@Michelle-pn9xt]

Why can't you give her a compliment without using the word old?

[@quanita9350]

@@Michelle-pn9xt I said “older” .

[@karenwinston2833]

She said Edward Scissorhands!! 😂

[@fatimazahramarah2634]

I always agreed with this judge judgment 99% Other than personal injury court

[@laurynorsborn8352]

No one is going to talk about 14:25 he said Kim instead of Karen 🤣 I know people make mistakes 🤣🤣

[@oopadur]

Two Grown Folks Disputing Over The Two George Bushes!, it's HILARIOUS!😂🤣😂🤣

[@winonaryder6305]

lol

[@crystabellecampbell5148]

The first case didn't needed to be in court bushes grow back smh. What's emotional damages hmmmm

[@myaabaee]

she is only upset because some people don’t want things to change after a passing. they probably drink lemonade together right now.

[@mikilacunningham6259]

@@myaabaee it sounds like this guy was a piece of wk he hasn't paid for the bushes they weren't on his property it wasn't his right to cut down someone's else's property.....

[@Whydtheyaddusernames]

Mikila Cunningham He tried to fix the issue and buy new bushes. I’m assuming, that he thought it would be okay because they had been friends/neighbors for decades and he was the one taking care of the bushes to begin with. The woman was emotionally unstable and the guy tried to make it right but she still took him to court.

[@mckenziecash5844]

It would’ve been better if she tried tree law. If they were so important she should have looked into that

[@ghostdragon5735]

1,001 is a weird number for a med bill

[@simyascorner]

you're ugly

[@erickmatamoros1853]

@@simyascorner 😂😂😂

[@lissaajz]

Judge and the plaintiff were really aggressive with the defendant in the 2nd case. Poor lady, she just wanted to see the bills!

[@zoeelauren4649]

She has every right to see the bill.

[@twice-3]

I’ll only sue someone if they try to cut down my food 😂

[@patsamuel9472]

I was awaiting the judges decision and she did well 👍🏻👍🏻💜

[@safiyayana]

sekonanaa sounds like a cool ass last name to hear during roll call.

[@victoriadoolittle105]

Yea it does like "Doolittle"!:)

[@tonydagreat3826]

I believe it’s Samoan

[@squirrell19861]

The defendant in the 2nd case has the COOLEST last name.....ever

[@suzanabrams1]

In the first case, there's one lady in the audience who used to be present at almost every episode of the earlier Judge Judys and she's here as well at the back. Here she's a blonde. On the JJ set, she had dark hair.

[@joet840]

Susan Abraham They are hired to be there. It's all court reality tv. Even some litigants are not real people involved in the case.

[@ThePresentTimeNow]

The cases are all real.

[@trinstraphouse]

the cases are real, but the audience isn’t

[@tiasway]

I thought they were only supposed to speak to the judge the lady with the blonde hair continued to speak directly 2 the other lady without the judge saying a thing. I also feel like the judge didn't even give the lady with the dark hair a chance to say a word she would ask a question then talk over her

[@info4u177]

She was trying to say the lady didn't get bit or her own dog bit her. The bite occurred regardless of which dog did it, that lady didn't close her door or gate and the dog got out. I watched a child get horribly bitten by a dog, I ran up and tried to hit the dog so it would stop biting the child. Dog owners need to be more responsible.

[@legodsantos]

I'm almost sure that the plaintiff in the second case was lying, those were very small bites to be from a bullmastiff, she was probably bitten by her own dog during the confusion they got into.

[@kaylaj490]

Even if her own dog did indeed bite her, the defendant is still at fault because the accident wouldn't have occurred if it wasn't for the defendants negligence by leaving the door open for her dog to escape in the first place.

[@irenelopez2152]

@@kaylaj490 Oh yeah

[@christinewilcox7080]

Dog bite case...why did the judge let the plaintiff talk directly to defendant multiple times? That shouldnt have been allowed. If i were the defendant, i would have insisted on seeing the bills, but i would have paid, not make them bring me to court

[@jacobborys8817]

The old people in the first case are SO cute!

[@KhajiitKitty1999]

Of course the blonde in case 2. Is named Karen 😹

[@julieholt2864]

So sad, hope they can reconcile.

[@SamanDroid]

If he had cut it like Edward Scissorhands it would have been a work of art

[@Michelle-pn9xt]

Exactly.

[@blessedtobealive]

I feel like she was really harsh on the defendant in the 2nd case. Wouldn't let her speak much.

[@info4u177]

The judge wasn't harsh, the accident was caused by her not closing the door/gate. This wouldn't have happened had she been more careful. Thank God no one's child gotten hurt. You have to be more responsible when you have dogs, they bite.

[@takiyah_6193]

For case two why was she suing for 1001 dollars if the bills was 916 and some change

[@citticat2]

I wonder if she had medical insurance and tried to make 2 claims.

[@kenyettaready]

yep. what i was thinking.

[@marilynwillett804]

he resembles bill cosby

[@geezee8710]

Hopefully he doesn't act like him 😂

[@lonnekejansen2306]

Only on the outside, I hope

[@hurricaneheli79]

1st case: Verdict is correct. 1) Neighbors for 30+ years 2) He did work for him over the years for FREE over that time. 3) Get a life, you should of been able to work it out with him without taking him to court. O wait he tried but you kept refusing. 2nd case: Verdict is WRONG 1) Faith, you cut off the defendant every time she tried to speak. 2) There is NO FUCKING WAY that was a Bullmastiff bite. Those bites are far worse even the minor ones by them. Her dog biting her I'd believe, look at it better. O wait you can't now & Judge this correct. I have been bitten by a dog before, a lab, minor compared to how bad those bites can be & it looked far worse than her bite. $1000 is HIGHLY EXAGGERATED. My bite was way lower than that.

[@zedmak]

hurricaneheli79 the verdict can’t be wrong she is the judge, where is ur law degree from? I think one should wonder why she ruled the way she did. You know that this edited, and she has a microphone in her ear, so I doubt u have her understanding of the law to interpret it....

[@hurricaneheli79]

@@zedmak "Can't be wrong" Bullshit Obviously you didn't read everything I put in the comment.

[@almacoleman1786]

hurricaneheli79 This is for vet AND emergency room. I went to ER for a bad sprain and my bill was over $2,500. The judge is looking at the bill, how exactly could she exaggerate it?

[@lorielhassani]

$1000 is NOT an exaggerated amount for a dog bite...she got lucky to ONLY owe that!

[@Randompotatoes-qs7bm]

Lori Sally yea I spent 1000s on a cat bite (it was infected),

[@ThePlutoandMarsEffectofTarot]

I understand what she is saying but damn they are just bushes. I don't think he meant any harm.. Now if it was a garden or something major then I'd raise hell.

[@nikita-lee9322]

Judge Faith have you ever owned a dog???? a leash, chained etc behind closed doors???? really …… dogs run out yes it is unfortunate the dog ran out when she opened the gate/door but we don't chain them down on our own grounds. that for me is animal abuse!!!!

[@leslieraab1820]

Not true. My dog has the run of the house for the most part, except at night when she goes in her crate when I go to bed and is let out in the morning. I walk her on a leash 3-4 times a day... But if someone comes to my door, I always put her in her crate or closed in another room before opening the door.... It's not animal abuse, it's being a responsible pet owner. Dogs shouldn't just be allowed to run out and do whatever because their owner is lazy.

[@zoefilmer8818]

Judge Faith was so rude to the 2nd plaintiff & the karen in the 2nd truly is a karen 😂

[@TreeABaby1]

Karen seem like she bout that life! Lol. She looked the woman dead in her eye and confronted her lmao

[@SB18TH]

First case: the plaintiff seemed unreasonable and a little irritating. The defendant tried to rectify the situation but she wanted thousands of dollars for pain and suffering over a bush 🤦🏽‍♀️

[@joannapierson4425]

2nd case the plaintiff's shirt looks really tight. Looks like the buttons that are buttoned are going bust off

[@joannapierson4425]

Going to bust off

[@zoeelauren4649]

Those buttons were scrrrreammmming--'she's gonna blow💥💥 '

[@SurrealKangaroo]

I announcer keeps calling the second plaintiff Kim, but Judge Faith calls her Karen.

[@angelayamoah50]

SurrealKangaroo They probably looking at two different cases and not paying attention

[@kayhaley442]

The way he said her last name was funny

[@destineeconkle9968]

Hahah I was trying to see if someone noticed it too.

[@jasthemua5365]

Why he say the defendant name like that in the second case 🤣😂🤣

[@patsamuel9472]

Pricilla is a piece of work, bushes being cut down is so upsetting to her and they usually grow back and she has HBP and acting like that, wow !! She can’t take them to the grave with her, going to court for foolishness

[@jaeforpay]

Can I hire judge faith as my therapist?

[@ellamcv1212]

It’s bushes. For god sake. 30 years Over bushes. Unbelievable.

[@Dub257]

The first 2 just had a misunderstanding, really shouldn’t have gone court tbh

[@crystalshaw8744]

Emotional damage...girl it's a bush

[@vitorsaints281]

02:00 'oh my Gooood' that lady in the green blouse looks a lot like Janice from friends lol

[@thepoetking70]

On the first case. Judge Faith needs to be more serious about someone's property being damaged. in the beginning she was smiling and act as if it she wasn't too concerned. even though they were bushes those bushes belong to the plaintiff and not to the defendant. the defendant had no right to cut down those bushes....PERIOD!!!

[@Daisy9101-k4u]

Andrew King LMAOOOOOOO you aren't slick. It's very obvious you're the plantiff or the member of the plantiff's family. Most likely the plantiff herself.

[@TheOpelkoenjas]

Oh common, you can't be serious, right? That man had no bad intentions at all when he cut down those bushes. He had been trimming them for so many years, and not one single time she made a complaint about it. He trimmed them and kept her yard clean at all times, even while he didn't have to do that at all. But all the sudden she made a big drama about it, even after he himself replaces those bushes (300 dollars) and several times apologized for the misunderstanding. She's suing him for 2000 dollars for emotional distress - DAFUK??? - and 500 dollars for new bushes (AGAIN), so in MY book either dementia has set in in her head or she needs money and saw an open opportunity (something tells me the daughter has something to do with that one).

[@ThePlutoandMarsEffectofTarot]

I agree that she needs to be more serious and also stop the audience from laughing. That annoys me with this Show. Old ladies are obsessed with roses, flowers and bushes but if it was me i guess I'd be upset too.

[@kayhaley442]

It aint that damn serious im sorry,once he tried to mk it right she shouldve complied

[@KickinItWithKrys]

🙄 Oh my goodness. You should go sit in on open court sessions. Or maybe you shouldn't, because those judges smile and occasionally laugh as well.

[@rhiannonlambert3348]

Did anyone notice the blonde girl in the first case that kept falling asleep?? 10:36-10:40 ; 11:18-11:29. Honestly me at school

[@rhiannonlambert3348]

Also EMILY SEEKUNANA

[@thepoetking70]

On the first case. I truly believe the defendant was malicious in his act of cutting down bushes that did not belong to him more would have bushes on his property. I am against what Judge Faith has just said in the case

[@drlovie]

The plaintiff in the first case is so over-dramatic and foolish over some plants. She recently lost her husband; life is more than just plants. What is the big deal? She really needs to do more with her life.

[@bomit-araqueenapinkbravegi4770]

drlovie some people take a lost of a loved one different in her case she put her love into growing her plants or whatever she does with them. plus she explained all the events that happened there so they were special to her

[@guykeelen2425]

I disagree she didn't get to see the f n bills that is what the case was about the bills oh my God

[@thepoetking70]

On the first case once again. I have a good feeling that Judge Faith does not own a house or any type of property. If so she will take care of the plaintiff for the defender cutting down and trespassing on her property and taking down bushes that did not belong to him.

[@mysticgalaxy670]

Andrew King lmao he was on his property when he cut them and even if he did it on her property, they are basically friends so he had permission to go on her property. Anyway he made a mistake and he apologized. Plus he replaced the damn bush‼️ smh (ever heard the saying, read between the lines?)

[@kayhaley442]

Damn why u so emotional over some bushes you keep commenting n shit

[@sigerg82nwtbs71]

Andrew King v

[@DC-wo2di]

Andrew King the plaintiff agreed to his purchase of replacement bushes. That’s a legal agreement.

[@Michelle-pn9xt]

I agree.

[@mitylene_bailey]

Plaintiff is so smug!

[@monikadunns9230]

I care less if they are young or old, this man got no right to cut down the lady edges to satisfy himself. It is not his property, maybe he wants to be the man in her life since her husband passed so hes taking small steps to enforce his wish. Am not sure that would go down that well with me, that's taking the fucking pissed. You dont go around pushing you plans and ideas on someone else to please yourself.

[@susannguyen7566]

He has a wife, and yes he was wrong but atleast he was gonna pay $300 to replace her bushes but she didn’t want to tell him what kind she wanted

[@lawrencegoggans2x]

DID Y’ALL PEEP DUDE IN THE BACK ON THE RIGHT SIDE OF THE COURTROOM KNOCKED TF OUT SLEEP! DURING THE BUSHES CASE 💯📜🔥🔥🔥😭😭😭🤣🤣🤣🥴🥴😴😴😴

[@Arxiuz2]

uh sorry wERE YOU THERE

[@oopadur]

Oh Lord!, NOT Mr.Brown Of All People. I Think Cora Was So Embarrassed About Mr.Brown Taking Them Two George Bushes Away From His Neighbor, I Bet Madea Getting Her Life After She Saw Mr.Brown On court Tv😂🤣😂🤣😂

[@anchoredminds5514]

Her name is Karen not Kim, narrator

[@TreeABaby1]

Dude said Kim Spencer but name says Karen 🤔

[@martinaslayton1589]

Uhh BEE hyyyd

[@joesoul4585]

ANOTHER BS RULING

[@arleneandrew8923]

Episode #37.... Was bit? Surely it should be "was bitten"

[@therealestmcc0y]

Yo ONuuh. Smfh.

[@NellieKAdaba]

Neighbour against neighbour.

[@00trevanti]

Really??? A fucking bush