Is This A FAKE Seagull 1963? An Investigation.

THE 'ORIGINAL' BY SEA-GULL IS TO BE FOUND HERE!
jomw.link/ali-...
BUT THERE ARE PLENT OF OTHERS THAT LOOKS THE SAM EBUT FOR MUCH LESS MONEY HERE!
jomw.link/ali-...
THE WORN AND WOUND ARTICLE IS HERE!
wornandwound.c...
ALBERT KAMINSKY'S BLOG IS HERE!
kaminskyblog.com/
SEE MY SELECTION OF TOP VALUE WATCHES AND ACCESSORIES ON AMAZON!
jomw.link/amazon
USE THE CODE ‘JOMW10’ FOR 10% OFF ANY PHOIBOS!
jomw.link/phoibos
USE THE CODE ‘JOMW20’ FOR 20% OFF ANY XERIC!
jomw.link/xeric
YOU CAN NOW HELP OUT THE CHANNEL BY BECOMING A PATRON! THANKS!
jomw.link/patreon
(The Small Print: Some of the above links are affiliate links. I am an Amazon, Phoibos, Spinnaker, Xeric, eBay, Jomashop, Meranom, and AliExpress Associate. If you make a qualifying purchase, I am paid a small finder’s fee from the companies in question. You don’t pay any extra for the product. Thanks!)
A reupload as I took it down when the channel was deleted due to the nature of the content. As discussed in the video, I do not think these are fake watches at all. In fact, it seems like Sea-Gull only decided to call the others fakes when they realised they were late to the party and wanted a piece of the action (other than selling the movements in all the others, of course). Anyway, a fun vid, and maybe a career in investigative journalism awaits me after all. Cheers, Jody

[@JustOneMoreWatch]

Hellooooo! This is a reupload which you may have seen before. I pulled it the week that the channel got deleted and reinstated because it contained the word 'Fake' and I was paranoid! Time it made a comeback! Cheers, Jody

[@MrWansty]

hi jody a shop on ali called flexfil has aquartz 1963 for 30 quid i kid you not...as well as a dubious longines heritage style watch also labelled seagull

[@nickp97]

Cheers 🍻

[@MrWansty]

@@nickp97 its probably plated alloy and they claim its sapphire crystal which i doubt

[@rag_man673]

It even comes in a bronze case now too.

[@TheAechBomb]

I knew it was a reup, because I didn't hear the new intro :D

[@glitchedoom]

Less than half price for sapphire and a display back for the most attainable mechanical chrono movement? Think I'll stick with the "unofficial" version.

[@H0kram]

Sapphire is not curved, the curved part is in steel on those versions. It's a totally different and not pleasant design feature not many people seem to take into account, because of too much focus on sapphire.

[@glitchedoom]

@@H0kram It does sound nicer, but I don't know if it's worth an extra $250+. My main interest in the 1963 is the movement more than anything anyway.

[@shlawchablaas]

That’s funny, the sapphire on mine at least is slightly domed, it’s a “red star” 1963 off Ali. Mind you, the movement can have issues (mine will run down if the chrono is started, then stopped but not reset, other people report other QC issues) but it’s a lovely watch, and the mechanical chronograph is so much more enjoyable than the various quartz ones I’ve used.

[@ashleymalamute]

If someone made a higher quality Rolex Daytona, it's still a fake.

[@servantofallah9425]

@@ashleymalamute the movement matters the most

[@VaioletteWestover]

I tried to buy another of the genuine version of this watch directly from China via my Chinese friend! She actually reached out to all of the sellers in China and they are all "fake" in that the actual 1963 reissue ended years ago and there are essentially NO genuine 1963s on the market anymore! The ones that ARE genuine costs around 1000 dollars! All sellers she reached out to in China have told her that the 200-300 dollar versions that they sell are copies made with the ST19 movement of the genuine 1963 sourced from seagull and some are even made by Seagull themselves but they are not technically the genuine versions which was the official reissue! Seagull also appears to have told watch manufacturers that they can copy this watch as long as they don't copy the back plate which are never see through on the actual reissue and has a three dimensional seagull logo on it!

[@Ben.N]

similar story, I am trying to buy one from within China.

[@ddr80]

Yeah the official tianjin seagull mall chinese website only has one chronograph with same same dial which has a non see through back case and black leather strap and cost almost $700usd when converted from rmb; I believe they do sell the st19 movement and other manufacturers can use it to make their own watches

[@HuwarangHaragan]

Do you think the 4k rmb one on taobao is legit to purchase? Im looking at it right now... thanks It costs alot compared to the 400dollar price...

[@hinrei1986]

And the irony fked up thing is, Seagull did it to sell movements. This is why I never had any interest in Chinese watch brands, they don't know how to protect their legacy.

[@bjpargeter466]

Communists tend to not believe in intellectual property ​@@hinrei1986

[@bogrot69]

I decided to pick one up a while back and I was met with so many variations, case size, price, swan neck, no swan neck, acrylic, sapphire, display caseback, non display. My head was spinning like Linda Blair's. In the end it was too much and I bought something else 🤣

[@robertsacknoff952]

Same

[@bogrot69]

@@robertsacknoff952 😂

[@CybertroninfiniteOfficial]

Sapphire no swan

[@longminh2759]

@@CybertroninfiniteOfficial is the swanneck ver better or the non swanneck ver better?

[@CybertroninfiniteOfficial]

@@longminh2759 depends if you plan on adjusting it yourseld

[@mmaclemon3179]

I loved the change of presentation. You told me a wonderful story and I learned a lot. Thank you so much for the history lesson. I’ll always watch anything you have to say about my addiction to affordable watches!

[@jays2001]

I'd pay the extra for the "original" but for one thing. They don't do a display back and I want to be able to see that movement, It's gorgeous!

[@garethsigrist8714]

So glad to see this one back up! Such a useful look into a really interesting watch. Horological history, business, politics and bit of intrigue! This videos has it all! Call me a nerd but this is one of my absolute favourite JOMW videos 🤓

[@JustOneMoreWatch]

Thanks Gareth! It took me 18 hours, so I was pissed of when I had to delete it 🤣

[@anthonysmith2982]

I'm with you Gareth. The Sino/Soviet split?, stolen swastika gold & swiss bank shenanigans, Sea-Gull v Seagull subterfuge & the simple ST19. This story has everything!.. and lots and lots of "S's"!!! In all seriousness though, it is a great little watch and the mov't itself is phenomenal. ✌🏼️

[@lowersaxon]

You are nerd.

[@hgr.7857]

💯 Same. Nerdy? If that's wrong, I don't wanna be right!

[@jazzman5598]

Mine was $369.00 from Long Island Watch. Just like yours…Saphire both sides…..broken….chrono was in-op but Mark was great. He sent me a new one and it runs and looks great with 21 jewels, column wheel, swan’s neck, a lovely watch. Real enough!

[@hgr.7857]

Marc is THE MAN & I fully intend to get a SG1963 from him as well to allay any questions about authenticity... Just as soon as I get my Islander 38, and Islander 40 (in emerald 🤩) lol

[@khairulhelmihashim2510]

the original watch was designed and conceived by government officials , and produced by state enterprise, so the design might be difficult to be copyrighted just like german flieger or british dirty dozen.

[@sjinzaar]

i am in China. I saw the watch on another channel and immediately fell in love. I quickly clicked on one of the e-commerce sites here and ordered one for RMB900 (about US$150). I was so impressed and happy, thinking that it is cheap because I am in China. I went to another e-commerce platform (regarded as more reliable) and found the same watch for nearly RMB 4800 (about US$800). Huge price difference. I immediately cancelled my RMB900 purchase as I was thinking it is a fake. After inspecting both sites, the 900 watch's back is flat with some inscriptions on it whereas the 4800's back has some embellishments on it. So even here it is confusing. I hate wearing something I have to make an excuse for but also don't want to be an idiot who is being taken for a ride. Urgh...

[@RAF71chingachgook]

The "Sea-Gull" 1963 is now up to $580. I just bought a quartz movement 40mm that's got a nice solid back, a plex domed crystal, and very good dial for $35. If original is solid back, I'd rather have the no-hassle quartz and an extra $545 in my pocket. :) Great video btw!

[@TheMarslMcFly]

A quartz 1963 for 35 bucks? Where did you find that?

[@RAF71chingachgook]

@@TheMarslMcFly AliExpress

[@deiveonmartinsen1831]

How’s it holding up? I’m considering the quartz as well.

[@alanmckinnon6791]

I was wondering where this video went, been looking for it for a while now, thanks for the re-upload Jody! The real Sea-Gull factory has loaded up their Ali page with tons of "information" and it all looks very much like an attempt to re-claim a lost spot. The telling bit is where they say someone looked again at the docs 50 years later... So what I think happened is someone else (HKED?) started making 1963 copies in the 2000s and Sea-Gull probably were not too interested. Some years later, and late to the party, Sea-Gull realized the market had run away with something they declined and they wanted to get back in the action. So Sea-Gull realized their own copy/homage and tried to shout to all concerned that theirs was the "official" "proper" "real" one. Hmmm, yeah well maybe. Maybe they can pull it off. One thing I do know is that Western values of copyright and trademarks don't apply 100% in China. They have their own values, different from Anglo-Saxon ones. Besides, as some other poster mentioned it was designed and made by state enterprise, so everyone's claim to anything is murky, even Sea-Gull's. Let the market decide. Quality should win out.

[@kristiangustafson4130]

Great comment, good observations.

[@justinnicholson8372]

So who has the best quality? Is it HKED or Sea-Gull?

[@terrybyford3605]

@@justinnicholson8372 I've not seen a Sea-Gull but I can attest to the finish of my HKed 38mm domed acrylic version is impeccably finished, and is very accurate. Tested against my Junghans Mega RC, I've not adjusted the HKed over 3weeks continous running and the minute hand has not yet reached 1 minute fast. I've read that he returns movements that don't reach his (higher) standards and by weeding out the poorer performing movements it really does look like he is able to offer a superior product, and whilst not the cheapest version of the watch, it is less than that charged by Sea-Gull themselves.

[@JimIBobIJones]

The "originals" were a side project by a Hong Kong seagull employee. Hong Kong seagull used to cater to 3rd party "own branders" who would work with them to design and manufacture watches in Seagull factories. The guy sold a handful of batches of them through various watch forums (if you have the patience to trawl through watch-u-seek It wasn't sanctioned by Seagull, wasn't an official model, but had "Tianjin Seagull Watch Factory" on the dial. The guy left but continued to make and sell watches. Seagull continued to make the "fakes" at their factories for own branders, the success and popularity of the model saw lots of different sellers flood the market. Seagull has sold a few "official" airforce watches throughout this time, but until 2016 none of these were identical to the "replicas". When they did make a "real" one, they retroactively laid claim to the original Hong Kong batches as "real" reissues.

[@olivierolivier2290]

By far the best intro to the Seagull 1963. The links are very helpful. Best compromise : the "official" seagull released in limited edition (5500 units) with a display case bought separately as Sea-gull does not supply them. But pricey...

[@tranthaison5982]

2:34 I'm sorry but why isn't the red second marker moving?

[@wingi7722]

Maybe some are Seagulls, some are Sea-Gulls, some are Oyster Catchers, Ferry Terns etc, (not to mention the ocean going Duck), which would mean the 42mm version is an Albatross.

[@mckiki4029]

Take a drink for every time Jody says “Seagull 1963” as a fellow Scot I’ll happily down my drink and start a fresh before I start! 😂

[@lindboknifeandtool]

I absolutely love the inclusion of cultural pieces from the years discussed. Amazing stuff.

[@carlosbornes]

Saw this for the second time. After the first time and went on and bought an official Seagull 1963. As a collector I believe the limited editions might make a good investment. Had it for almost one year now and I love. The only problem is that the movement is loud AF

[@UrbanRave1982]

Loud???? Mine is not.

[@xavierteacher]

very interesting video about the 1963, thank you so much for all the informations, in the final, I didn't quite understand if the movement(st1901) in the "not originals" 1963 variants, is original or just a different movement that is similiar to the st1901??? Thank your for the respond!!!

[@swagikuro]

Without knowing the rich history/discussion around the watch, I fell in love with the look. I went through this rabbit-hole hole myself the past few days and have decided I will get one the HKED recreations. He seems to have the best rep for quality and the look of the watch is apparently closer to the true original design.

[@tjwright]

I read that Sea-Gull sells the movements to and officially licenses two other factories to make the 1963 - Red Star and Sugess - and that any that don't come from one of those three is a "fake" and might have a knockoff movement that's not an actual Sea-Gull movement. At least that's what I read about it.

[@user-kw9qu2gz8v]

I strongly doubt that fake st19 movements exist, due to the extreme complexity of a mechanical chronograph, and that a real st19 costs $70 retail.

[@andrewlim7751]

With the official supplying of parts to these 2, Seagull also used to sell rejected parts cheaply to everybody, they subsequently stop doing that.

[@shawnsheep5141]

In the Chinese forum, it is a believed “Sea-Gull Tianjin” did not authorize the licenses, but the licenses might exist. The reason was the Tianjin Watch Factory went through several reconstructions in the past 20 years. The “Sea-Gull” trademark were held by several holding companies, in Tianjin, Shanghai , Hong Kong and Singapore. These holding companies also went through reconstructions, so though the Tianjin Factory exists, there are several other legal persons own the right to use the trademark.

[@anthonysmith2982]

Thanks for the re-upload JodyOMW! It was good to see if again with a bit more experience under (the gut above) my belt. I have a 38mm 1963 from Sugess. I was constantly having to re-zero the chrono hand... until it fell off. So I got a lemon. Didnt 𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑙𝑙𝑦 bother me, as it's a bit small for my 8“+ wrist, so I bought a 40mm version from Seakoss. Love it. Great dial proportions, and the 40mm X 50mm case is 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑓𝑒𝑐𝑡. I've got a 38mm Pierre Paulin panda from Murkur, but again - bit small. Gonna flog that and grab a 40mm Panda from Sugess... again. But I've got a Hemel Air League with the mov't too and will be buying a Poljot Strela with the ST19 rather than the Poljot 3133. I really dig the mov't. I buy the swan neck regulator version (when possible) and always go Acrylic (also when possible). In fact, after I significantly down size my collection I'm going to collect ST19 powered chrono's. They're great looking, reasonably reliable, in-expensive 𝑎𝑛𝑑 I have a spare mov't (without a chrono hand yeah, but easily fixed). That'll give me the freedom to buy & sell the ~$1K re-issue tool & military watches I love and still have some $ to collect something I really appreciate. These mov'ts are special man, for those of us who dig retro chrono's but don't have the funds to fuck around with vintage or Swiss column wheel mov'ts, this is pretty much it. Cheers and thanks bud.

[@jokur2630]

May I ask why you prefer the acrylic over sapphire? Just for the vintage look?

[@riothero313]

My 1963 is the 42mm, gold tone dial, sapphire crystal, display back, and 1901 movement with the swan neck regulator. I love the thing. What never shows up on the photos online of the 42mm is the side of the case has an amazing reverse curve on the side from the middle toward the case back. It's almost like a covetto/cove or something.

[@jasonsmith1375]

What a great video Jody! I have been looking at this watch for sometime and all of this information was extremely informative. Thank you so much!

[@Texmotodad]

Hey Jody! I learned how to drive in a 1963 Bus! Thx for wearing the shirt and bringing back some good memories!

[@FrankLavoy]

Ouf! 😅 I'm out of breath! What a journey. Thanks for sharing Jody! Hope all is well in your neck of the woods.

[@zckls]

Based on this video I bought the genuine Sea Hyphen Gull, and very glad I did. It is truly beautiful. Unfortunately the sapphire ones don't have the "bubble" shape to the glass, which really makes it look special. For those worried about acrylic vs sapphire, invest in a $5 tube of polywatch and give it a polish every few months, and it will look as good as it did on day one.

[@travr6]

Where did you buy an actual one? Shows sold out.

[@zckls]

@@travr6 aliexpress on the official sea gull store.

[@brianmsahin]

Great explanation Jody......can you tell us all that again? LOL.

[@JustOneMoreWatch]

😳

[@user-rt9rx8us6c]

nice Tee Shirt Jodi the VW Bus is close to my heart and I know collectors that have gone down that rabbit hole.

[@RunawayYe]

These two things are certain: 1) If any of the unofficials have "sea-gull" written on the caseback then that is a "fake/replica". 2) The HKED models are "homages" to the watches that actually went to production (the red star ones were only prototypes as far as I understand). As for all the other unofficial red star models... who knows? They're not outright replicas if there's no "sea-gull" written on them but they're definitely more than homages. I mean Pagani Design might make a Submariner homage but you don't see them using the Rolex crown as their logo. On the other hand the red star is not exactly sea-gull's logo...

[@its_ruhan]

and considering they use the exact same movement, don’t see homage watches sourcing rolex, omega etc. movements much 😂😂

[@dannyg6592]

Excellent video! I love my Seagull 1963 as it is the most charming watch I own. It is the 38mm version with display case back. Lovely movement to look at. I paid $138 and that included a second (and very nice) vintage leather strap.

[@oak6302]

Whered you get it

[@dannyg6592]

@@oak6302 Aliexpress. They have gone up a bit since 2021 but you can get one for around $150 on sale (I have the Red Star version and it is a great watch).

[@jwags24]

Here for the re-upload because this is great content and learning material 👍🏻

[@coldfusioneer]

It's $630 now! Wow ...

[@shauncol1967]

really useful - i've been through the pain of trying to work this out - great video.

[@EdgyShooter]

Trying to work out if I want the closest to the original (38mm, acrylic crystal, 19 jewel etc) or a more practical but still beautiful one with the sapphire crystal (usually 21 jewel) maybe even with lume? Also, I will be getting that clear case back as the mechanism is just too beautiful to hide

[@youyoutube6716]

Miss the old background 😌

[@JustOneMoreWatch]

Ha! I don't miss my old apartment though mate. It was small and mouldy 😬😬

[@paulsteele6120]

Having seen these watches for sale since the early seventies in the so called "Communist China Stores"in Hong Kong,Kowloon and other Chinese based shops. It was interesting with all the tantalising watches on sale in the former British possession, the young engineers on board bought these watches, mainly based on price. Some years later having moved to Australia I met up with an old ship mate in Sydney for a beer or three, I mentioned that he had bought one of these watches and was told that he wore it only infrequently, because the he had it serviced in Aussie and it cost him a fortune. The reason is that original cost at Chinese production rates was and is cheap. However, the movement is still a complicate Swiss designed mechanism and western watch repairers do not work for Chinese rates. It is safely concluded that don't have the movement serviced, keep it for spares and purchase a brand new movement from any of the many clone manufacturers. Still nice looking watches , however.

[@mark01ization]

The question is how much does it cost to have someone do a movement swap on it?

[@hambone988ubet]

This may be the time to “buy what you like” since you really don’t know what you are buying!

[@robllewellyn]

Thanks for making this. Interesting layers of info!

[@sergei971]

In the Soviet Union, same product might get manufactured in different factories. Not all factories were equal. For example quality at Factory A might be better than Factory B, even though supposedly they are manufacturing the same product. They probably made minor changes as well. As there are no trademarks or patents in the Communist system, I suspect same theory applied in China. Different factories were making this watch and there were minor differences. There is no such thing as fake or not authentic, as long as the watch was manufactured in China, they were all “authentic” but with slight variations in quality or design.

[@SidBonkers51]

A great subject and highly interesting history. That said I'm pretty sure the one I own is fake as it cost £21 and has a quartz movement in it ;)

[@gromit1996]

I bought mine from Burnside Chrono in Australia and I'm happy-ish enough with it as a "homage" and/or "reissue". They tested it and made sure some of the QC problems they were having are ironed out. Mine is a Seagull 1963 ST1901 Venus 40mm Chronograph with a Sapphire crystal and Display Back. I think navigating the myriad options to buy the "original" was a bit too complicated for me and I just went with the one that made things easy.

[@johnwheat5199]

I have the so called "Official" version, I have also owned two other "None Official" versions, including an HKED. I don't know if I was unlikely, but both of the unofficial watches suffered from a slight stutter on the stop watch function, where as the official version performs flawlessly.

[@mediastarguest]

Very informative. The "big question" is ; if the official Tianjin factory which made Sea Gull "1963's" no longer makes them - what does the factory actually currently make ? Has it been closed down ? Is it still manufacturing watches or is it a watch factory that no longer makes watches ? So instead, does it make parts for lawnmowers ? Why operate and keep running a watch factory which doesn't make its most famous and popular product ?

[@quadrupleheart]

This video is exactly what I've been wanting to see about this watch!

[@peasantrobot]

Compared with that limited edition bronze case, this one is gorgeous! I WOULD LOVE ONE!

[@terrybyford3605]

I went for the HKed version 38mm with domed acrylic. Simple, really, as it seems to me to get even closer than the official Sea-Gull reissue in that it uses the Star Trek style logo most closely relating to that of the original, although it does have the exhibition case, which is no mean thing, IMO, as it isn't often we get to see a chrono movement in all its glory.

[@danielmccarthy1982]

Got mine from Ed today - a beautiful watch, and a great guy to do business with.

[@terrybyford3605]

@@danielmccarthy1982 Agree on both counts. He always responded to my enquiries. He really thinks about his customers.

[@junevenesadang2386]

I prefer the one with transparent back. That is the essence of having a mechanical watch...for you to see how it moves.

[@wayneholmes637]

Not if you travel a lot as it makes the watches very vulnerable to magnetic fields. While travelling I even managed to get my strongly anti-magnetic Sinn 856 magnetized even though people say this is impossible and can't happen from airport security. Happens to me so often I had to buy a demagnetizer to take with me on my travels.

[@timetowatch_francois]

OUF! What a journey! I'm out of breath after all that information 😅 Thanks for sharing.

[@allanlarsen5098]

Bought a 'Red Star' 42 mm with caseback and sapphire glass, from a German importer. Is it an original Seagull? Guess not.... But it makes me smile to be wearing it.

[@impsire]

I own two of these. A 40mm Chrono Heritage M1963/X - SEA-GULL ST1901 bought directly from Sugess Watch in China and a 40mm limited edition Red Star bronze Seagull 1963 that came from the official Seagull 1963 store in Belgium. The Seagull is a watch that is hard to fault and I‘m quite fond of both of mine but my customer experience with both companies was hardly satisfactory. In sum I was swindled twice. The Sugess was supposed to come with the Swan Neck movement but didn‘t and unfortunately too much time had elapsed before I found out for me to be able to do anything about it. As for the Belgian Seagull 1963, it was only after I had received it that I found out that they do not individually number their limited edition watches (instead all 300 are numbered 1/300) and that it was missing it‘s tag, manual and registration QR code. It was also shipped about two months past it‘s preassigned shipping date. The company in Belgium casually dismissed my concerns and when I asked to return it they informed me that the 14 day return policy had expired. Be very careful who you buy from. The Seagull 1963 company in Belgium seems rotten to the core. I wouldn’t deal with them again if they paid me. BEWARE.

[@brianmurphy8154]

Great info Jody...I may have to watch this twice to take in all the information...I did take away that I can also just wait for the Pagani photocopier to fire up and pump this thing out for $45

[@eastcoastwatchconnection7949]

This was a great video. Glad it’s back up😀

[@jarhead6153]

Great history here on this watch…thanks mate…!!!

[@tunghq]

Great video. Very details & clear explaination. Thank you.

[@seacal7946]

I watched this video a number of times and a few years ago, it helped me buy a Sea-Gull watch made from the original factory. As you mentioned, that was just a personal choice. Love the watch and your channel/videos... If you ever find yourself in California, let's have lunch.

[@medgasguy]

I got very confused from your video but not because of your video. It is very well detailed. I guess the bottom line is for me is the movement, i bought mine just for the movement so I opted for the cheaper model with the 2 lines of text and the signed crown.

[@islandterror5198]

Lol , just sniped the 38 mm Sapphire on eBay for $ 48 & it's brand new & running great ! Didn't even know what version it was until it arrived. 😁

[@frankschroth4038]

I've got the Seagull 1962 limited to 650. Great watch with all official papers and leather box. But don't expect great accuracy, even from the original Seagull company. Lol

[@kenfritz9565]

Today, in 2024, the Sea-Gull sells for $766.29!!!! I bought my "1963" on sale for $116.20!! and it's more than fine for me. Same movement and goose neck. I'll keep the other $650.09 in my pocket - thank you.

[@Gearsandco]

I Got the cheapest 1963 I could find on Aliexpress, $133 after the back to school discount, and I opted with the mineral Crystal since I wanted the supper domed Crystal and a but more durability, and so far I am very happy with it I even checked it on the time grapher it was running 4sec/day which is really good. I can't stop wearing it!

[@antonioputini2675]

I had it for one week when I accidentally hit the glass and lost it along with the bezel. emailed Seagull about the replacement and they told me they don't provide spare parts. Sent it to repair and the watch shop told me they don't repair chinese watches. I just dumped £250 in the bin.

[@UrbanRave1982]

Send it to me in Sweden and I’ll fix it for you

[@purplepurposee]

Thanks for this 😊 it helped.

[@HemingwayJones]

It’s nice to hear the old theme music. Love your stuff.

[@v.t.3194]

The Version with Red Star and transparent back is more beautiful so i prefer this one

[@notrondayt9]

You’re correct there’s a whole industry of non original “seagulls” out there

[@timlee8531]

Thanks mate appreciate the work that would have gone into this.

[@EdgyShooter]

Biggest question, acrylic (19 jewels) or "sapphire" (21 jewels)?

[@danielmccarthy1982]

I may be mistaken, but I believe that all modern ST1901 movements are 21 jewel. The '19 ZUAN' logo references the early remakes of the Venus172, which was a 19 jewel movement.

[@jamesdamenti2092]

glad you are using my favorite background of yours!!!

[@awuuuwa3461]

I remember seeing on their official websites saying the 399 version is actually based on one of the designs that was not used back then.

[@mhirst16]

Anyone have any idea which company produces the Moon Phase 1963's? That's the one I've really got my eye on!

[@QuantumJ67]

At $150, it’s a no-brainer. At $399, it takes some mental gymnastics. But today this watch is $560 on AliExpress and that takes it out of consideration altogether. There are far more compelling watches at that price, new or used.

[@thegit8698]

I have the same style 1963 as you have there and I don't even care if it is original or not, I love it, it keeps excellent time it's pleasing to the eye and pleasing to wear, I realised it wouldn't be an original going into the purchase and after wearing it over the past year I would definitely purchase another

[@markadams2765]

I've ordered a Seagull 1963 made by Sugess, which they call the watch Chrono Heritage SU1963BN with a Genuine Seagull ST1901 movement. As they make no claims that this is a genuine Seagull watch. I would call it a homage watch.

[@Lobstersarefabulouz]

Have you received the watch? How is it holding up? Been looking at Sugess as well. There are so many offerings that it is becoming hella confusing

[@markadams2765]

@@Lobstersarefabulouz I have the watch it's part of my collection so I'm not wearing it everyday , it still works fine.

[@111111111Tiger]

At the official link these are over $600 USD now...

[@kbh2200]

Hands down the best explanation about this watch on KZbin!

[@JustOneMoreWatch]

Thank you!!!

[@Pshpshpshpshpshpshpsh]

Aren’t they all “replicas” or unauthentically authentic?

[@NicholasSadlier]

Very nice watch - I'm pretty keen on it as it's my birth year - first and last time I will be owning up to that. (Not sure why they insist on putting a nato strap on a watch designed to show off its rotor-less movement though)

[@evanwolf6618]

🙄🧐🥸 perhaps the watch should be worn upside down .

[@Hornsvinet]

Been thinking about getting this watch for a long time. I can't tell from the webpages if its a "real" one or a fake one, guess the achilles of online purchases :/

[@dukethiago1]

I sent this video to lots of friends and Whatsapp watches groups, it is so informative and clarifying. Nowadays I have a 42mm case blue dial based 1963 becouse if it can't be 100% original, so kick the bucket and take a blue, green or panda version, still based on the original disign and most important, the same ST1901 movement.

[@stavros_katsopr]

Jodymentary indeed...

[@Dashdonkey]

What about sugess? They seem to be pretty established on aliexpress selling the same thing

[@briangriffin77890]

Is the swan neck version worth it? What does it do

[@a6260075]

這節目內容研究很用心，沒錯現在的1963還有1962都不是當時這個計畫有的產物。而最OG的版本為何沒有在官方生產?原因很簡單~因為賣不好！ 海鷗官方生產最復刻的版本是D304這支錶，在中國的收藏家裡也是非常珍貴的! 然而在當時D304版本推出時不夠有「中國特色」市場反應並不理想且毛利低而提前停產。 現在這些1963、1962只是迎合世俗市場的產物而已，原始的這支錶是軍用品。哪來這麼多色彩繽紛? 不同於ROLEX與OMEGA原本就是世界的精品鐘表，回顧「登月」這個世界矚目的事，以知名軍表而言5517的知名度遠不如登月表(一隻面盤極度簡單只為適讀最大化)，那麼誰還會在乎1963年落後的中國僅僅只是為了一般的軍事飛行而開發的D304??? 這些符合歷史的版本在當時的歷史也只有少數真正使用的人事才懂而已，那是純粹的軍費吃緊的情況下誕生的軍用品，而非商品或精品！ 一個真正的中國飛行軍表在當時就連普通百姓都沒見過的東西談何回憶?談何情懷? 真的追求歷史的你該收藏D304或HKED的全黑或全白那些顏色單調但卻符合歷史的復刻版本！

[@lightberry1197]

This is a great lesson for China on copyright these days. To be frank, copyright thingy doesn't help much when most of the population were starving in China. However, on the bright side, entry level watch player are able to enjoy the non-genuine nice pieces at at much affordable price.

[@hoicho]

Thanks for the explanation . I ended up buying one from Sea-Gull official store. My thought is that the design is named Seagull 1963. If you cannot tell me what is the name of your brand or factory, then it is not official

[@gori277]

Hi mate Have had both the domed acrylic and the sapphire crystal side-by-side? What would you suggest.

[@raymction947]

Get any fake seagull and enjoy - you can not get more authentic chinese watch than that!

[@EPC]

None of them are "ORIGINAL". The original one has another logo instead of the star... it has an arrow with an oval thingy as the logo. The original vintage Seagull 1963 that was used by Chinese Airforce. Sea-Gull "official" is the one who purchased the rights to make the watch entirely, but they're selling the movement to many other watch makers, including the next one below. Seagull "unofficial" buys the movement from Sea-Gull and they make theyr own version... that is almost identical, BUT they offer sapphire glass and ofcourse, the transparent back so you can see the movement. Paying more for the same movement and without having transparent back and sapphire glass... is not worthed. In my opinion, Sea-Gull "official" or Seagull "unofficial" are both... "official" since they're both using the identical movement as the vintage one, they are both equal... "official" but not ORIGINAL.

[@aaaaaa6583]

Was 399 dollars now almost 700 dollars a year later on date 7oct 2022 from same official store. How do they get away with price rises that much 😳

[@brettread1347]

Great show Jody, for what it's worth I bought this off watching your show and really enjoy my Fake:)) keep up the great work!

[@hinrei1986]

This is a perfect example of a watch brand don't know how to protect their legacy.

[@Voldnarok]

I want to be able to see the movement I would get the original if was with the glass on the back... is not possible to see the movement in the original then I'm going to get the cheaper version

[@rayxfinkle8328]

Isn't one of the big differences between an original and a replica the Venus 175 caliber movement vs the new ST19?

[@gerardhiggins1]

I know this is not a fresh post. Hopefully someone will read this. It's gotten to the point that even $50 Casios are being faked today. So when I go on Ali Express I'm afraid to buy anything. Any tips for safely shopping on Ali anyone?

[@Verdoux007]

I noticed the same thing when I started searching for a Seagull 1963 and just gave up because I thought that they were all fakes and I'm not about to spend serious money for a fake watch.

[@jimohara654]

interesting to see that these are now £439 - thats quite a jump since September

[@XtremeKremaTor]

The panda one with a second hand, with a star counter weight, is a gorgeous piece

[@Archer-hg9rw]

you should compare both, the sad thing is they're selling the original for almost 700 now

[@steveblake8766]

Imagine, FAKE Chinese watches! Is no fake safe?