Jesus, imagine being married to that police woman, she never stops talking, one of those that says the same thing in a dozen different ways.
@andrewstratford47533 жыл бұрын
She even told what the male coppers number was cant talk for himself?
@kbeesmot99283 жыл бұрын
@@mapledelight What has your reply got to do with my comments that she never stops talking? landscape photographer and tazering me, sorry, that went right over my head.
@nicklewis18823 жыл бұрын
You never know, her wife might be just the same!
@kevinchamberlain79283 жыл бұрын
She need's dry-bumming.
@nige38012 жыл бұрын
@@nicklewis1882 PC 69
@markgregory71403 жыл бұрын
I am 55 yrs old and NEVER called the Police for anything, watching these arrogant clowns in costumes validates that decision.
@activeshooter93503 жыл бұрын
She admitted earlier that you had done nothing wrong before they misused section 43. Get them done geezer.
@MrJonny23243 жыл бұрын
"If you have done nothing wrong, you have nothing to fear". 🙄 There is no way they had any grounds for suspicion, please sue these corrupt criminals for the sake of public freedoms.
@PINACI3 жыл бұрын
Not the old "if you've done nothing wrong then you've got nothing to hide" line !!
@mat121283 жыл бұрын
One of their favs, along with the climate, and day and age
@PINACI3 жыл бұрын
@@mat12128 Would you like a shout out on my channel ? OK to make up a small compilation of clips and link back to your channel so people can watch the conclusions ? More people need to see these abuses.
@brianhoskins19793 жыл бұрын
The thing is, he has got something to hide. As do we all. It's called basic privacy. Giving your details to Police is objectionable for many privacy related reasons. If you are not known to the Police, why would you want to be when you've done nothing wrong? If you are known to the Police then giving your details exposes you to an interaction with them that you would probably prefer not to have, especially as - again - you've done nothing wrong. Claiming your right to privacy is not equivalent to an admission of guilt. That is the utter stupidity we witness here in this video and on many other videos on YT as well. I personally would not be brave enough to have an interaction with the Police like this because I don't trust them and you can see here how they twist things to fit their own narrative in ways that disadvantage you. Respect to this guy for the way he conducted himself under pressure.
@mat121283 жыл бұрын
@@PINACI Hell yes mate!!! You are a star!
@davidbayley3 жыл бұрын
@@PINACI that's the audit seal of approval is it? Keep your Goggle eyed sprog of the screen.
@greenvalley58433 жыл бұрын
She had far too much to say for herself.
@marcusmacdove72023 жыл бұрын
Don't ever think you being pleasant will stop them abusing you .
@mat121283 жыл бұрын
Makes them look twats when it ends up investigated tho!
@Ca55ten3 жыл бұрын
The aim is to make them look like twats on camera so we can raise awareness etc, the people investigating don’t care what they look like we want them to be publicly embarrassed.
@Ca55ten3 жыл бұрын
@Barry Thomson. Shutup Barry u twat the amount of times I’ve seen police abusing their powers online recently this is one of the victims who’s done some research and manages to make an income from it too and most of the time he teaches them how to do their job.
@iconoclast6733 жыл бұрын
"If you haven't done anything wrong..." classic! Ask them their personal details and oddly their refusal to answer isn't indicative that *they've* done something wrong! 😂
@gregcoston3443 жыл бұрын
I dont understand what they expect to find during the search, an isis membership card maybe?
@mat121283 жыл бұрын
😆
@jordanhinton60453 жыл бұрын
Lol! Hoping to find his ID probably... hopefully Mat doesnt carry ID :D
@richardh17643 жыл бұрын
Rocket launcher, semtex, booby trap.
@topcat13583 жыл бұрын
Greg - Nice one! ...I didn't know ISIS issued membership cards too. I suppose they have to carry them on active service though, just to prevent mix-ups.
@gregcoston3443 жыл бұрын
@@topcat1358 yeah literally, it's an identity card they need to have on them at all times, especially when filming a police station 😂
@ctownstretchy85363 жыл бұрын
how unprofessional can the police be. The girl is painful and smug but walked away with nothing but wasted money/time, embarrassing to watch
@easilyoffended81063 жыл бұрын
Disgrace. Utter utter disgrace. No suspicion of terrorism, no grounds for search, just a bunch of butthurt bullies.
@mat121283 жыл бұрын
👊
@freddyflint38893 жыл бұрын
I think if you wear a official police auditor id would be good
@winstonsmith47503 жыл бұрын
Mat s an officer
@freddyflint38893 жыл бұрын
@Record Your Government Diy
@ysgol32 жыл бұрын
The message is clear Matt - never EVER interact with these people if you can possibly help it. Incredibly corrupt people, using S43 unlawfully for spite. Brilliant work again. Please claim, I'm sure you have, let us know how it's going.
@TonyBecks19693 жыл бұрын
I absolutely love how you act when they push for details, nervous, not confident,,,,"do i have to give you my details then"?? Love it!!!!! Love it, love it!!!!
@mat121283 жыл бұрын
Reel the tossers in let em hang themselves like they did here
@hnmedia11613 жыл бұрын
Tyrants. That was never a section 43
@mat121283 жыл бұрын
I know, fuming!
@cyberghost45173 жыл бұрын
Because he would not give is details. That's why they come out with that shit section 43 tyrants abuse It all time they are laughing stock.
@johncarrolan85873 жыл бұрын
FFSake. People don't always tell the police truth. The inference is that the police always tell the people the truth. I can see their little Halo 😇 glowing above their head! 😂
@markosmith80372 жыл бұрын
WOW - what a brilliant audit, absolute textbook. Conversely, what an embarrassment from the Kendal Police. Lets hope training is provided. Great work mat12128 🙂
@jamesclough76563 жыл бұрын
Terrorists must be starting to get pissed off when they get mistaken for public photographers in this day and age. 😂
@kbusy67133 жыл бұрын
😂😂
@Neil_Tovey3 жыл бұрын
😂😂
@loved_9793 жыл бұрын
quality
@bigearedmouse173 жыл бұрын
Brilliant Comment Bravo.
@pook28303 жыл бұрын
_"Terrorists must be starting to get pissed off when they get mistaken for public photographers in this day and age"_ He's not a photographer. He's a knob who deliberately goes out of his way to cause conflict so you lot can circle jerk about it.
@jamesclough76563 жыл бұрын
They genuinely believe that because they became police officers that their opinion matters more than a citizen, and that they have a right to talk down to and be condescending towards members of the public who pay their wages. It makes me sick, you cant behave towards the public like that in a minimum wage retail job but you as a tax funded public servant can behave in what manner you want.
@spaceoddity543 жыл бұрын
I love the way this guy starts off the interaction like he is completely confused and feeling threatened by the situation when in fact he is in total control.
@mat121283 жыл бұрын
Glad someone gets it ;)
@livestream39463 жыл бұрын
Hardly he gave them all his details 😂😂😂
@CJ01753 жыл бұрын
"Being cheeky" Is knowing your rights cheeky now? 😂
@mat121283 жыл бұрын
👊
@saraprva41723 жыл бұрын
"If you've done nothing wrong, you're nothing to worry about" - Said by tyrants everywhere
@markjosephbudgieridgard3 жыл бұрын
Disgraceful behaviour from those officers especially the female. Don't let them get you down. You and Oscar are going great work. Very much appreciated by all your subscribers. Excellent 👍
@mat121283 жыл бұрын
🐾 👊
@gc68553 жыл бұрын
You’ve helped pay for those vans. Every right to photographs
@industrialfun3 жыл бұрын
You have to have a job and pay taxes to pay for stuff. So doubt it somehow.
@homebrewinstrumentals77003 жыл бұрын
@@industrialfun sausage
@TheSadButMadLad3 жыл бұрын
8:45 Police demanding that you turn off your camera is unlawful. They have their body cams running so you can have your camera running. They may request that you put it down, but they can't demand that it is turned off.
@welshinfinitygamer51333 жыл бұрын
She stated “you have not done anything” and then said “you don’t have to talk to us” How can they then escalate to Detainment under Section 43 of the the terrorism act for doing the exact thing that she just said was not illegal or wrong to do!
@Brucebogtrotterlovescake3 жыл бұрын
Under section 43 cops do only need to give their collar number, but they did once again abuse section 43 to search you.
@TheBILLANDERSON3 жыл бұрын
the officer searching has to give his , his name , collar number ,station ect, from the full GOWISELY in order, This link here gives more understanding some good reading of cases by Iain Gould iaingould.co.uk/2020/09/14/the-gowisely-procedure-and-unlawful-stop-and-search/
@Stuart_George3 жыл бұрын
@@TheBILLANDERSON GOWISELY is used for 'normal' stop and search under the Code A Code of Practice. The Code of Practice for stop and search under section 43 and 47a is slightly different, and names do not always have to be provided. From the sec 43, 47a Code of Practice..... '5.4.4. The names of police officers are not required to be shown on the search record in the case of operations linked to the investigation of terrorism or otherwise where an officer reasonably believes that recording names might endanger the officers. In such cases (including in relation to section 47A searches) the record must show the officers’ warrant or other identification number and duty station.' Was this an 'operation linked to the investigation of terrorism', or did the officer 'reasonably believe that recording names would endanger the officers'? Probably not, but my point is that Code of Practice IS slightly different for Section 43 stops. Even if the stop is for BS reasons, such as this one.
@zcharged82943 жыл бұрын
@@Stuart_George yes like Stuart said, I don't think they are legally obliged to give a name during a terrorism search. but I think they are still supposed to identify in some other way, such as shoulder number
@livestream39463 жыл бұрын
@@TheBILLANDERSON no he doesn’t. Not for a Terrorism Act search.
@TheBILLANDERSON3 жыл бұрын
@@livestream3946 CODE 5.4 =record of search CODE 5.4.1 (e) = the officer’s warrant number or other identification number
@RonSeymour13 жыл бұрын
They didn't say what they expected to find during the search. That alone made it unlawful. And how does checking your identity show what you were up to? Do a subject access request to find out exactly what their database shows on you now. Good luck trying to get to the US.
@wl6603 жыл бұрын
He was searched, but did they ID him? Accept a receipt for the search without providing info would be the way to go to avoid having issues at US Border Control.🥸
@RonSeymour13 жыл бұрын
@@wl660 Mat knows better than to carry ID but because he has been doing this for a while now they will have a record of him. It would be fairly easy for the police to ID him. They need only have followed him home as he is always with his dog. Perhaps they have nothing but it would be good to check.
@brenda1378 Жыл бұрын
@@wl660 you do not have to ID when searched under sec 43.
@altonhants3 жыл бұрын
Sect 43 is purely and simply used to find your driving licence or some other ID. Don’t carry any. Under sect 43 you don’t have to give your details. The talk about concern and terrorism was BS. If it was genuine why would they let you continue. Pure and unadulterated intimidation.
@__-nz4ip3 жыл бұрын
Try the silent treatment next time - they can't do anything if they can't get a response from you - they can only respond to a response
@gotherecom3 жыл бұрын
Saying "Know English" can be amusing so long as you remain silent after and don't react to any further questions.
@bellalegendre26443 жыл бұрын
@PC. Yann You shouldn't have to repeat yourself though. You make the statement and then go silent. But that's just me
@outlaw64213 жыл бұрын
i wonder if a freedom of information act request should go in to see how many times they have searched photographers under this act
@topcat13583 жыл бұрын
outlaw - That's a very good idea. One I think that should be followed up on. The ABUSE of S.43 POTA and Sec. 50 of the other Act is utterly disgraceful and totally illegal.
@tourettes48933 жыл бұрын
Aye, and how many of those photographers searched turned out to be terrorists, it would be most useful in working out why they keep detaining people with cameras. Must have a pretty high hit rate for them to keep on accosting folk... .. . Otherwise why would they continue doing so?
@HathnoFear243 жыл бұрын
while they mess with a guy taking a photo of pig van , a teenager is being groomed by the rats these pigs should be protecting them from ..
@michaelbates70253 жыл бұрын
Well that just about sums it up "init"
@topcat13583 жыл бұрын
Why is cops NEVER, or very rarely, wear their hats nowadays? - in this current climate and in this day and age, they run around NOT in full uniform!
@DMC8883 жыл бұрын
It's due to the current climate, global warming and less rain :P
@leathleyg59953 жыл бұрын
The old pointy helmets make them look like what they really are..... Pricks....!
@technojoe40793 жыл бұрын
They're actually supposed to. Well they were back in the day.
@johnbratley69263 жыл бұрын
@@technojoe4079 No longer mandatory and in fairness most city plods are flying from one grade 1 job to another hats are just an encumbrance when jumping in and out of cars.
@technojoe40793 жыл бұрын
@@johnbratley6926 I know, I did say back in the day. However, there was a long time rule that they could only act fully under the role of constable with it.
@michaelkerry61633 жыл бұрын
dogs got more common than the tree of em
@johnscott46933 жыл бұрын
...and the moment he said the reason was “your furtive nature” not as required under the Police code “specific prior evidence of the individual relating to terrorism” ... it was an illegal search, as was switching off the camera.
@joshuapickering91313 жыл бұрын
Ah kendal police finding and making up excuses to boost there none existent arrest numbers
@deppresedonion63203 жыл бұрын
When u hear "This day and age ".u know whats coming next terroisiom always .
@paulwatling54003 жыл бұрын
How can giving your details protect you
@cdechirume29792 жыл бұрын
The governments especially of NATO are the real terrorists. They go around bombing other countries to drive their weapons industry. Those poor pple they call terrorists are actually freedom fighters
@MrPhantom4533 жыл бұрын
4:06 She specifically stated that, You've done nothing wrong."
@topcat13583 жыл бұрын
On the one hand, they say "if you've done nothing wrong then there's nothing to be worried or concerned about". THEN, on the other hand, they ask for the name and address cos they are "worried and concerned". Well if THEY'VE done nothing wrong, then surely there is nothing for them to be "worried and concerned about" Their logic is completely ILLOGICAL.
@melanieoakley87403 жыл бұрын
That's because it's verbal diarreah they're taught to spout as mindless robots following other people's orders!
@flukedog3 жыл бұрын
i put in a google review i hope everyone else shows their displeasure
@mat121283 жыл бұрын
Haha, nice one!! 😆
@activeshooter93503 жыл бұрын
Same here.
@MeColinYouWho3 жыл бұрын
A guy taking pictures in the Lake District, that's suspicious, not many people take pics in lake district.
@bigal24173 жыл бұрын
🤣
@ChristianHoyle3 жыл бұрын
hahahhahahah good one
@LeDrew83 жыл бұрын
Those police vehicles belong to the British tax payer. Keep up the good work exposing the corrupt system. God bless you
They only use PACE and Section 43 To Inadvertently “find “ ID, That condescending Female officer was the worst of the 3
@raymondlawrencechalmers75803 жыл бұрын
You're doing fantastic work mate. Very brave.
@mat121283 жыл бұрын
Nice one Raymond, Respect mate
@raymondlawrencechalmers75803 жыл бұрын
@@mat12128 looking forward to pt 2.
@albertrichardson61603 жыл бұрын
More serious abuse of s43, The searching officer MUST identify himself by Name, collar number and home Station before the search starts, have permission from a senior officer, should have also complied with your request for a sergeant and he must give you a 'receipt number for a report showing the grounds for the search, what they are looking for and under which section. Photography on its own is not enough. Turning the camera off was unlawful as well, they are not allowed to do that. You also are not required to identify under s43. Completely ignorant bullying bunch of amateurs. As soon as they ask for your 'details' shut up and say nothing.
@topcat13583 жыл бұрын
Albert - I think there's an exemption for cops searching under POTA to NOT give their name, because of the special nature of the offence.
@albertrichardson61603 жыл бұрын
Top Cat what offense? Ha ha
@jamesclough76563 жыл бұрын
@@topcat1358 I think that only applies if they genuinely have reason to believe the person is a terrorist or has ill intentions.
@topcat13583 жыл бұрын
@@albertrichardson6160 - You're right there was NO offence. I should have said "suspicion". Sorry!
@TheBILLANDERSON3 жыл бұрын
@@topcat1358 that's for TACT units
@surfdigby3 жыл бұрын
"We're just chatting" If it's just a chat, you don't need my details.
@ronprince14783 жыл бұрын
They proved why you should be wary and defensive around police.
@havok90013 жыл бұрын
if a cop just walk up & start asking for ID for non crime & say they un-safe then they in the wrong job also if they touch someone & search them that assault, searching without a warrant & etc there for the cops sure be fired, charged, put under arrest & get a lawsuit
@havok90013 жыл бұрын
when cop say this day of age reply back & say will u full of shit by saying it & this day of age all cops are dumbass who need learn the law if not quit & find new jobs
@stuarthowell25103 жыл бұрын
they need to state their name number and the station they are based at
@danmcadie25153 жыл бұрын
No they don't under Section 43 of the Terrorism Act.
@TheZimma3 жыл бұрын
Your allowed to film whatever you like the coppers know this , they are probably bored
@ianhill45854 күн бұрын
They may know he's an auditor, and cops hate auditors and will give them grief just for the sheer hell of it.
@h4ppychap3 жыл бұрын
One must have, by now, observed the behavior and modus operandi of the blue costumed clowns and realised all blue costumed clowns follow the same modus operandi. All one has to do is to prepare reasonable responses to those same questioning tactics all the the blue costume wearing clowns use. This will close down their defenses when making a complaint and/or one grows a set of balls and decides later to challenge their behaviour in court.
@wl6603 жыл бұрын
Under Section 43, they do NOT need to provide their name. But there is a lot of other information they are OBLIGED to provide if searching you under S43, like why they are detaining you. You need to be better prepared for this, so please read up, and insist they provide all that info, and as they will likely make a mistake here, you can then follow up. Your videos are great though. 👍
@mat121283 жыл бұрын
I will do some studying of it as i am learning a lot as i go along and much from all you guys! Respect and thanks to all! 👊
@michaelwityk39903 жыл бұрын
Sorry they have to provide 3 forms of information and that's in their police policy
@wl6603 жыл бұрын
@@michaelwityk3990 “Identity - The officer’s name (except in the case of enquiries linked to the investigation of terrorism, or otherwise where the officer reasonably believes that giving his or her name might put him or her in danger, in which case a warrant or other identification number shall be given).”
@wl6603 жыл бұрын
See Section 5.2 here:- this is the Code of Practice for The Terrorism Act. assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/97944/stop-search-code-of-practice.pdf
@mat121283 жыл бұрын
@Wil Jones Yeh was me, could of used it here too
@peterpiper44923 жыл бұрын
These so called law enforcers makes me so sick to the stomach, they abused him for what they claim is for "his own protection", I though you only get loads of crap coming out of pigs at pig farms!! I couldn't be more wrong.
@theaylesburycyclist87563 жыл бұрын
The sad thing is, I can see the UK government passing a law that effectively makes street photography illegal without some kind of licence. Take for example how quickly drone registration became a legal requirement...
@theaylesburycyclist87563 жыл бұрын
@Richard Dawkins Cheers flower 🌼 Unfortunately, you're missing my point, dear boy.. 🙄
@theaylesburycyclist87563 жыл бұрын
@Richard Dawkins Wow! 🙄 I'm not comparing what he's doing, with drone use. I'm merely using how quickly legislation around the use of drones was brought into effect, purely as an example. All the government would have to do, is make it mandatory for people register online as a photographer, then get given a license number that you would be legally required to quote if you're stopped by the Rozzers. In exactly the same way as drone registration, for example..
@robertwalker18633 жыл бұрын
All kit and no common sense!!!
@topcat13583 жыл бұрын
Ciao is good, but I think "you're dismissed!" is even better.
@mat121283 жыл бұрын
Watch part 2, coming soon then ;)
@topcat13583 жыл бұрын
@@mat12128 - Deffo! Looking forward to it. You're doing a great job
@tit7913 жыл бұрын
When’s part 2 coming
@mat121283 жыл бұрын
@@tit791 Will get it uploaded on wed (21st)
@mat121283 жыл бұрын
@@topcat1358 👊
@irnbruman66843 жыл бұрын
the search was unlawful, they did not state what suspicions they had under the terrorism act, refusal of details or photography are not terrorist acts, he also had no right to take camera or turn it off, you can film a search for your own protection, that became assault when he did so. A search can only be performed with a purpose of finding a specific item, a terror search can only be performed when there is specific information or terror activities in the area. when this happens court is needed its the only way they will stop doing unlawful searches and be forced to stop abusing acts
@adcolt543 жыл бұрын
The female cop is talking in circles.
@tit7913 жыл бұрын
And annoying... could you image living with her and having an argument. ... Jesus you’d walk out
@adcolt543 жыл бұрын
@@tit791 and she doesn't listen. She would talk over you and not hear a thing you would say.
@spinningwhat33153 жыл бұрын
They are so thick and lap doggy, that circular reasoning is a natural occurrence due to their poor levels of self thinking.
@adcolt543 жыл бұрын
@@spinningwhat3315 not really. they are trained to ask questions in this way. sure, there may be some bellends but they are trained to get you to give up your details. best to say what you are doing and remain silent.
@venusssharman59223 жыл бұрын
I have a lenient view towards the police.. I understand they have a very demanding role to play in society.. And for sure there are lots of great cops out there.. However, certain police officers abusing their privilege as law enforcers is not on... Those particular police officers won't care if you sue the force because the payout is from public funds. Not their money so why should they care.. They won't face charges or be disciplined by their superiors either
@mat121283 жыл бұрын
Well said
@brianbarber4753 жыл бұрын
If there were good ones they would stop the bad ones doing what they are doing. Are they?
@venusssharman59223 жыл бұрын
@@brianbarber475 You would think so.. However, they are a collective and i guess what it boils down too is you are either in or out.. If you don't support our abuses or pretend it did not happen then it is you are not one of us, and face being ostracised... I think for the good cops its a very thin tightrope they are on.. Not saying i agree with it though
@TheHughsharkey3 жыл бұрын
The great British police at it best , who does she think she is
@michaelbates70253 жыл бұрын
Tell you what pal, she's doing a job that you wouldn't have the courage to do eh! Remembering the two female police officers who attended a call out to another one eyed wanker. They are in their graves now as a result... How would you feel if that was your Daughter?
@TheHughsharkey3 жыл бұрын
@@michaelbates7025 ,took some mental gymnastics to get to what you wrote, from what I said you crank.
@michaelbates70253 жыл бұрын
@@TheHughsharkey Mmmm does not make any sense at all, "Mental Gymnastics, What the fuck does that mean? Too big a word for you to understand?
@KP987833 жыл бұрын
Police need to stop using laws that don't apply. If everything is so secret why don't they put it all behind big high fences that no one can see anything through. Also as a number of auditors have pointed out has there ever been a police station attacked. If you don't agree you are either argumentative or suspicious. Stop the paranoia
@edwardbowkett6783 жыл бұрын
IF HE WAS A MUSLIM THEY WOULD TAKE HIM IN AND GIVE HIM A CUP OF TEA .
@JamieLeeMedia3 жыл бұрын
And here are the racists!
@freijnichols3 жыл бұрын
She clearly doesn't get it much
@markcooper19403 жыл бұрын
She's got a long tounge
@freijnichols3 жыл бұрын
@@markcooper1940 don't they all?? Thought that was standard?
@tecnomagos.l.26843 жыл бұрын
Terrorism Act 2000 section 47AB. 4.13.1. c) the police have no power to stop the filming or photographing of incidents or police personnel.
@bleedingfly3 жыл бұрын
Ooft... that was a close call! Thought they were going to find your RPG Launcher!
@armsie1003 жыл бұрын
when was last time police station was targeted by terroist never
@DMC8883 жыл бұрын
Maybe they think they're in Northern Ireland
@DaveThompsonfairlife4all3 жыл бұрын
Or more to the point, how often do they catch a terrorist through searching someone under the section.
@DMC8883 жыл бұрын
@@DaveThompsonfairlife4all unfortunately for them I don’t think there are many terrorists casing police stations with their camera in plain sight and with their terrorist membership card in their pocket.
@alexritchie45865 ай бұрын
@@DaveThompsonfairlife4all Oh it gets much worse than that. Every single successful terrorist that has perpetrated an attack within the UK in the past thirty years was already on multiple state watch lists, from the police, to Prevent, even MI6. The security forces suffer from a bizarre delusion that once they find out someone's details and put them on a watch list nothing further will happen.
@johnbratley69263 жыл бұрын
Sadly, way back when I was a police sergeant, my heart would sink every time a PW interjected herself into a situation. It was like turning on a tap, they never knew when to shut up. Often their incessant prattle only served to wind up a situation that was almost resolved. I'm not a misogynist just a realist PW's were always bloody hard work.
@catherineoconnell32133 жыл бұрын
They always use the "Terrorist Card" If they used that on me ......I would laugh my head off 😂😂😂😂
@bsb11kat253 жыл бұрын
she has a huge chip on her shoulder!!!
@EyeSpyAudit3 жыл бұрын
She is a very very poor Police Officer 😑😑😑
@goncaloamaral78463 жыл бұрын
She’s brilliant
@EyeSpyAudit3 жыл бұрын
@@goncaloamaral7846 really 🤣😆
@tecnomagos.l.26843 жыл бұрын
Section 47 - photography is not suspicious under the terrorism act
@wl6603 жыл бұрын
assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/97944/stop-search-code-of-practice.pdf Code of Practice 4.13 is very clear about this too...
@livefeed247now3 жыл бұрын
using section 43 just for a refusal of details is outrageous ,the police are out of control
@x666Rage666x3 жыл бұрын
What’s your name? What’s your name? What’s your name? Boom!! Section 43 blah blah blah!! This abuse of powers needs to stop! This Act needs to be amended/scrapped.
@mat121283 жыл бұрын
Wait till you see part 2!
@ianhill45854 күн бұрын
Pointless rescinding 43 , they'll just jump to another PACE code, speaking from 2024, they've used sections 5, 50 and tried 136 mental health act.here in August 2024 they are playing with sec 35 dispersal orders because of the civil unrest.these scrotes just jump from section to section.
@daddyo65533 жыл бұрын
I was walking my dog and she started wagging her tail I thought she could smell cannabis
@Outlaw-Pete3 жыл бұрын
I think you (and all other auditors) should print out a copy of the search code of practise, highlight all the relevant details such as photography by itself is not reasonable suspicion for a search, the criteria they must give you before they carry out any research and how to obtain a record of the search etc and very politely ask if you can read it to them before the search takes place. Or perhaps hand over a copy so the others can read it whilst your being searched. Surely this would stump them a little to question what their doing? Then I suppose you’ll know who the good cops are and the bad eggs. Would love to see some reactions with this.
@mat121283 жыл бұрын
Will be doing this next time
@brenda1378 Жыл бұрын
@@mat12128 keep it in your pocket, they will think ID
@stevennorth64843 жыл бұрын
I think members of the public will quite easily see who's in the wrong. Photography isn't illegal, not giving your details isn't illegal. Have they not heard of the right to remain silent. The terrorism act wasn't bought in to terrorise members of the U.K. public.
@bobmirdiff20432 жыл бұрын
Common knowledge in Kendal is that the Police Station is NOT at Busher Walk (where this was filmed), but is located at the Masonic Lodge in Station Road!
@martynlucas26913 жыл бұрын
"You've done nothing wrong......"
@chrisjenkins40943 жыл бұрын
43 again...when will sausage meat learn...
@PurpleChickenTV3 жыл бұрын
Section 43 of the Terrorism Act 2000 can only be carried out if the officer has reasonable grounds for suspecting that they will find what they are looking for. SO ask them before the search what they are looking for
@andyscouse40903 жыл бұрын
So your white British and a citizen not shouting Ali akba, and everything is a concern.standing up for your rights is now a crime according to the Romans.
@arseburgers42083 жыл бұрын
These police officers, are incompetent. Make them answer in court for their unlawful detainment and acquisition of identification.
@crankyjack75733 жыл бұрын
Follow up on this one. These thugs were well out of line.
@richardh17643 жыл бұрын
Mr policeman the public is 100% behind the fact that photography is not a crime.
@thetravellingtokers63853 жыл бұрын
They are all filthy scummy pigs 🐷 thanks for sharing & BIG RESPECT to you & your cool dog💪🏻😎👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻
@mat121283 жыл бұрын
Nice one mate!
@stvbee74793 жыл бұрын
"If you've done nothing wrong, then you've got nothing to hide". "Well if I have done nothing wrong, then you'll have a f*cking hard job of convicting me of anything".
@39devonshire3 жыл бұрын
Tyrannosaurus tyrants
@larryforeman71573 жыл бұрын
The female officer can talk incessantly and convinces herself that she's actually saying something meaningful. She's evidently the lead bully in this group. She's a very poor listener and doesn't hear anything. She needs another course in logic. Eventually the male bully succombs to her bullying and joins in. Please, please, tell her to SHUT UP for one minute.
@mat121283 жыл бұрын
Excellent breakdown of the situation
@JamesBond-xq3tw3 жыл бұрын
1639 needs sacking .
@paull56783 жыл бұрын
Their sows are the worse they have no idea how to de escalate a situation they try to show they have bigger balls than the bores
@minatormyth3 жыл бұрын
Oh o feel disappointed, I was hoping this was a video of 3 police officers getting bats around the heads. Oh well🤔
@davearmstrong22963 жыл бұрын
Very, very important to take them to court. You should fill a complaint form in first, but then, asap, register to take them to court, as they will hide the complaint (not answer it) for 6 months from when it happened, thinking you won't take them to court before you get their response. And they know, if they don't respond before 6 months are up, you cannot take them to court. This is why you must take them to court before they respond. And don't tell them you are taking them to court. A good contact who can really help you is the solicitor Iain Gould (IainGould.co.uk). He has won lots of court cases against the police.
@mat121283 жыл бұрын
Interesting stuff there mate!
@simondalzell56355 ай бұрын
I was Born in Kendal and have lived there all my 59 years. Very disappointed by these clowns and will tell them if I see them around.
@daddyo65533 жыл бұрын
Can you put your masks on please you are scaring me and the dog
@mat121283 жыл бұрын
Yeh, and that!
@TheBILLANDERSON3 жыл бұрын
Police code of practice 4:13:1 (C) you can film/video/photo's of police as the police have no power to stop the filming or photographing of incidents or police personnel. FACT assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/97944/stop-search-code-of-practice.pdf stay safe
@mat121283 жыл бұрын
Thanks again Bill
@thethundercrack56192 жыл бұрын
Another great video Mat. One tiny criticism, why do you only get assertive and argumentative with them AFTER they've trampled all over your rights and are walking away? You're too nice to them in the initial stages.
@xyzxyz-hi8lp3 жыл бұрын
4:56 “yeah. Please help me out. I’m not getting anywhere...” 🤣🤣🤣🐽
@WR4SSE3 жыл бұрын
That womans tone is like nails down a chalk board.
@TheSadButMadLad3 жыл бұрын
6:30 Female PC: "What you are actually doing" This is after Mat has already said he's taking pictures for Flicker. They aren't satisfied with that even though it's an honest answer. They want to hear someone say "I'm taking pictures to hand to a criminal so that they can damage the van". The stupidity of the police in thinking that that is really what's happening when doing so is the least likely way that a criminal would damage the van.
@mat121283 жыл бұрын
Exactly, common sense would say that although it is unusual what the hell can someone do with pics of a police van........
@lynnebyrne81543 жыл бұрын
She was desperate for him to kick off. Cocky cow
@Adam-ge8iq Жыл бұрын
Never talk to the police! Never give details or ‘help’ then. That’s not the public job to incriminate ourself!!