Kent Hovind Brings Both of His Brain Cells to a Debate

Buy my book here! store.bookbaby...
Support me on Patreon / planetpeterson
Join Discord: / discord
Check out my podcast rss.com/podcas... or open.spotify.c...
Support me on Venmo: account.venmo....
Be sure to follow me on social media!
Instagram: / planetpeterson
TikTok: @planet_peterson

[@optimus_rhymes6955]

The funniest part of this video is when he says he pays taxes.

[@sibco96]

That didn't age well. He complained of his tax dollars being used to teach evolution in public schools, yet our tax dollars had to pay for his incarceration.

[@kinglyzard]

​@sibco96 It didn't age well, yet he keeps spouting it.

[@charlieinwhite]

prison marriage was his happiest marriage

[@chrisking7735]

My first thought was "where are his tax dollars?"

[@jdarmin]

I think my favorite moment of all time was in his debate with Professor Dave where Dave said, "Oh, TAX dollars? do you want to talk about TAXES, Kent?" Dave is such a condescending - but 100% right - meanie..

[@Metaljacket420]

If only Kent applied 1/10 the skepticism to Creationism he does flat earth.

[@Ninth_Penumbra]

He only dislikes Flat Earth, 'cause he hates the competition.

[@rylanasher4756]

6:57 "my tax dollars" 😂😂😂😂😂😂

[@WiteNite666]

My buddy next to me when I responded out loud "what do you mean 'the tax dollars you didn't pay?'"

[@rylanasher4756]

@@WiteNite666 his tax dollars are as factual as his beliefs.

[@billymanilli]

...for sure the funniest joke Kent has!

[@ritchie6162]

I got to read some of his thesis that he wrote when he graduated from the evangelical unaccredited degree mill and it literally starts off with “Hello, my name is Kent Hovind” like 😂

[@ROFT]

Not before he thanked jesus for helping him on his dissertation.

[@jhoughjr1]

A Logicked classic. Though Pendelton is greater

[@antonypost19]

Logickeds Kent hovid series is simply a master piece 🙏

[@miskatonic_alumni]

​@@ROFTThere can be no greater blasphemy than to accuse Jesus of having been involved in the writing of that travesty.

[@tsolum4126]

This video of Kent looks quite old. Since these good ol' days Kent's been in prison for 9 years for tax evasion. He's had 3 wives, a domestic violence allegation, he's harboured a child sex offender at his compound and the offender had a young boy sleeping in his bed, a child drowned in his lake... This is not an exhaustive list.. . I've seen parts of his dawktoral dissertation and it looks like it was written by a grade 4 student. Kent hasn't changed his script since this video. Dog, banana, zee-donk...

[@Saboteur4]

Don't forget the classic "you believe we came from a rock" 😂

[@tsolum4126]

@@Saboteur4 Yep, Kent classic.

[@shiftfire84]

I have a slight bit of contention with your 4th grader comparison. Fourth graders don’t outright try to misunderstand things and lie about being Doctors to mislead people. Lol

[@tsolum4126]

@@shiftfire84 You never met my kids🤣🤣 No, but seriously, Dapper Dinosaur did an expose on the dawktor's dissertation kzbin.info/www/bejne/gZazaX97mLehpbs You can tell that he attended a trailer park university with no other students or teachers. I wonder if there was electricity and running water.

[@kinglyzard]

​@@Saboteur4 If Kent didn't come from a rock, why does he still have rocks in his head?😅😅

[@mrscenescof4747]

Both his brain cells? You may have miscalculated, I'm pretty sure he only has one and it's in a coma.

[@daelnelbel]

Rounding error

[@manuelwatts1864]

Probability #4 - The other brain cell died of loneliness ...

[@hannuala-olla4302]

"quit using my tax dollars" is hilarious coming from convicted tax fraudster.

[@zacharyberridge7239]

There's just frankly no way to get across to Kent that he has a fundamental misunderstanding of evolution. He's motivated to not get it.

[@TH3-MONK]

You cannot make a person understand something when their livelihood depends on them not understanding it.

[@KingdomsGrace]

Darwinian evolution is on its last legs. The mechanism for mutation is purposeful and directional to an end that results in successful development in the environment. So not random mutations. Epigenetics is strangling darwinian evolution it will take 20 years for the sheep to catch up.

[@quotedotes]

Exactly. I've come to realize, that religious people are *motivated* to misunderstand things that disagree with their dogma. "It's not that a "kind" isn't a thing, it's just that gawd did it like this, so believe it, filthy atheists!!"

[@thephantomeagle2]

Nothing Kent Hovind has ever said has any substance

[@nic5211]

Other than “Guilty, your honor”

[@ronaldcarr5686]

Unless that substance comes with abuse.

[@umaiar]

The post hoc is strong with this one 😂

[@jettythesunfish]

A fairy tale, he calls the theory of evolution, yet he thinks a mud man and rib woman actually existed and that a boat carried and supported two of every species of existing animal for forty days and nights.

[@kinglyzard]

And the Sun stopping in the sky

[@miskatonic_alumni]

And there were talking snakes and donkeys and a Hebrew superhero who struck down hundreds of armed and armored Philistine soldiers with a donkey's jawbone. Plus other superheroes who served King David and also single-handedly slew hundreds of enemy warriors. All totally true, just like the comic books that chronicle the exploits of The X-Men.

[@bpa5721]

That was just the rain part. Then it took 150 days for the water to subside. So 190 days in total. Guess they were all Breatharians.

[@cobalt4045]

KZbinr Planawalk had made the case that Hovind should be a Flat Earther considering his rationale for rejecting a round Earth is no different from his rejection of Evolution. It's actually a case I have made for any psedoscience apologist no matter what science they wish to deny. The dilemma boils down to the apologist can either accept Flerf and be wrong, or they can reject Flerf and be a hypocrite.

[@Diviance]

If it helps, Hovind is also a sovereign citizen (though he doesn't bandy it about as much as his pseudoscience views). His sovcit beliefs are part of why he ended up in prison for structuring. Sadly, that isn't even the worst thing Hovind has done. He defends a pedophile regularly and allows him into his park (which is where said pedophile did the crime that got him convicted) with children around (and even brought in a child with said pedophile).

[@hakonberg8003]

Kent using the word fairytale is kind of funny 😂

[@KinKnives]

I've seen Kents ex giving birth to a cucumber

[@amandarhodes4072]

I don't think she was giving birth to it. It was probably in there for another reason. Probably to compensate for Hovinds inadequacies.

[@DaviniaHill]

Kent Hovind, 3000 debates, 0 wins.

[@jamierichardson7683]

1 script

[@hailsagan8886]

1 cup....

[@tylerwest719]

1 haircut

[@sibco96]

1 prison ID #

[@kinglyzard]

One brain cell.

[@Petticca]

@17:30 Sure, he'd "predict" coal. Be interesting to hear why, and how, along with the evidence explaining the process by which this 'instant coal', and 'instant oil' and 'instant gas' why not, was created during 'the flood year'

[@hakonberg8003]

The name of your channel almost had me skipping the video.... I assumed for a second it was smth Jordan Peterson related 😂

[@GunnerHeatFire]

Kent hovind has braincells???

[@Farce13]

Don't worry, he doesn't pay them either

[@CeezGeez]

Kent's braincells are spaceless and timeless like his god

[@GunnerHeatFire]

@@CeezGeez 💯

[@-gearsgarage-]

His brain cells beat the shit out of one another on a regular basis, he’s had 2 confirmed strokes of genius.

[@jhoughjr1]

Or do braincells have a kent hovind?

[@nicksykes4575]

Define irony,.......Hovind calling evolution a fairy tale.

[@kinglyzard]

Alternate definition: Kent bitching about "paying out tax dollars" for evolution in schools!😅

[@paulhudson8315]

In all theyears of Kents existence, he has learnt nothing and keeps spouting his ill informed rhetoric

[@sibco96]

It keeps the donations coming in, though I suspect he's not doing as well these days.

[@thenotsodiscretewolf2098]

notice how he change the real word to theory. mostly to claim "theory means pre tested".

[@connietrotterdedgrl6861]

The fact is Octopuses are really the smartest most adaptable animal ever. And they would leave humans in their wake if they had a longer life span. It's probably why

[@jdarmin]

there's a lot that limits them, though. for example, one of the greatest leaps in mankind's history was the taming of fire, which led to all kinds of discoveries such as metal forging and the like. This led to vast improvements in man's history. The fact that the octopus evolved to live in water is just a bad draw of cards from the deck. By the books I've read it seems unlikely they will be able to make any developments on this front. I've read some science fiction that speculated on alien species that still managed to develop things like metal forging by using thermal vents and such, but it seems like this would be a little far fetched lol as smart as they are, it's really unfortunate they're water animals. who knows how far they could have gone???

[@ottomaddoxx5360]

@@jdarmin The Discovery Channel "Future is Wild" series ran a scenario where squid evolve dense muscle bundles and are able to walk on land. That was their prediction for the next intelligent animal species to dominate Earth.

[@adryanclay]

I think the guy (Kent Hovind) has an addiction with debating. (spewing his agenda while ignoring whatever the opponent says).

[@LJacyHenry]

100% certain English is a germantic language, but I understand your point.

[@AlexPBenton]

Yep, just like how humans are apes, etc

[@davidjhills]

A rock would change its mind faster than Kent Hovind. He just ken't do it.

[@TypicalEveningPictures]

Couldn't it just as easily be argued that "kind" is based on the planet. So we are all earthlings and therefore the same kind...its so vague.

[@braedenmclean5304]

Fun fact, we actually have a really good genetic idea of Noah’s lineage, and can see what roughly his descendants would look like! They are called the Habsburgs

[@miskatonic_alumni]

Criminally underrated comment.

[@kinglyzard]

38:30 If the Grand Canyon were created by a global flood, there would be Grand Canyons all over the world.

[@davidjanbaz7728]

There R two larger ones in Mexico: but they aren't from a global flood.

[@braedenmclean5304]

Also, why would a global flood make canyons? Why would it choose to carve out random sections

[@Midnight.Wisdom.]

​​@@braedenmclean5304 Choose to? That's what water does when it recedes to lower ground, while following the path of least resistance.. Most if not all rivers are carving canyons out of the ground as we speak.. It just doesn't happen in 150 days.. (give or take)..

[@braedenmclean5304]

@@Midnight.Wisdom. that’s what I’m saying, if you just dumped all that water down like that it wouldn’t really carve shit

[@Midnight.Wisdom.]

@@braedenmclean5304 When just dumped down yes.. But when the water recedies, it would've carves several canyons... It didn't.. But I do get what you're saying.

[@burkettnathan822]

Just so you people know if the enitre human popukation came from one family that will only be 44 generations before 100% of offspring are infertile.

[@uncleanunicorn4571]

Al-Ghazali, on the Incoherence of the Philosophers argued against the manipulation of numbers. Because Allah, or something. This is probably the best way to engage Hovind, being deliberately, incorrigiable dishonest.

[@jhoughjr1]

Aquinas said I think "all truth is gods truth"

[@jhoughjr1]

If he believed his bullshit he would know the grave peril he is in misleading and lying to his flock

[@CeezGeez]

13:03 you don't even know what a zippity zopp is?? and you call yourself an intellectual

[@stephenspackman5573]

The thing that baffles me is the inability to see that what you judge to be a “kind” depends on the data. Root mammals _were_ only one kind; it was _after_ they had split into distinct species that those species evolved into cats and dogs and elephants and walruses. So what he is saying is actually true(!), but it was _also_ true in the past, _which is how evolution works._

[@Angelmou]

I like to remind all people you are capable of nailing creationists to their very own holy book. The bible for example says: Leviticus 11: 22 _Even these of them ye may eat; the locust after his kind, and the bald locust after his kind, and the beetle after his kind, and the grasshopper after his kind_ In the hebrew original of the bible the _Harbeh, (Ha)Solam and Hagab_ ( הָֽאַרְבֶּ֣ה & הַסָּלְעָ֖ם & הֶחָגָ֖ב ) migratory/swarming locusts of Egypt. Creationists claim therefore: locusts, bald locusts and grasshoppers (or the 3 "breeding" "variations" of the swarming locusts Harbeh,Solam and Hagab of egypt in that time period) shall be *created kinds / after his/their kind* by GOD. Or the bible would with "created" "Kind" - bara min not be literally word by word correct. So basically: The biblical God spoke an _incantation spell_ and "poof" there was a bald locust/ or more precise the Hagab swarming locust KIND (depending on translation from the old hebrew dialect) and it shall be absolute word by word truthful in that matter. The term kind comes from the hebrew original of the bible bará (בָּרָא‎, he created / the lord created) and min ( מִין‎, "kind"). To speak "Kinds" into existence by God's magic/miracles instead of actually observable biological mechanism in big technical details (like the observable shifting of allele frequencies in actual biology.) However REALITY shows observable that locusts, grasshoppers, kathylids, crickets and all swarming locust species of egypt from Solam to Hagab etc. are evolved variations of Orthoptera locusts and subclades of insects, anyway. That is the very reason why bald locusts and grasshoppers are still locusts (as their variations) and why locusts in general are ALSO still insects. As insect "variations" in Hovindian tone to use. That is why evolution is true and the bible authors making up the bible did not have a clue about biology. The historical background about this Leviticus passage example was people to be aware of different hatching and starvation risk cycles and to allow to eat those who eat your harvest. So to speak: Ah dang you are blessed by the lord himself for eating those nasty different but similar created critters stealing your harvest, despite of using locusts swarms as plague in another part of the bible. For the same reason bats are seen as "fowls/birds" in Deuteronomy and Leviticus as well. The bible also made the mistake to claim insects or "crawling things" have 4 feet instead of 6 as hexapoda - because the very first insect species were once a hexapoda "broodstock" variation alongside of springtails (formerly falsely classified as true insects). Creationists like the Hovindboy makes the funniest excuses for that specific part of the bible like mentioning a mantis to have technically 4 legs as 2 are there to hunt so he tries to argue somehow all originally created insects would be some sort of mantis with razorsharp hunting frontlimbs, despite of death not to be there in the garden of Eden interpretation of the story by him to maintain the evangelical christian dogma that humans brought death into the world by eating the fruit. Just having effective assassination bugs around, ready to strike for decoration somehow. A more profound error in a literal creationist reading is in the book of genesis chapter 7 with the story of noah's ark and the dove as clean kind to fly away and back with a twig in the dove kinds beak to indicate the flood is over, also repeated later. This is also found in deuteronomy as well. With the birds like the owls and the little owl as "kind" or the dove too as clean kind. Evolution is actually true, because the dove is still a bird variation a subset of columbidae birds and not any ex nihilo created dove kind incarnated as it is today to fake its birdness and pigeoness for some deceit reason. The bible is also false, because humans are seen as created like they are today with faking the apeness instead of still being apes as they actually still are alongside of chimps and bonobos as our cousins. If the bible would be true we would as humans still be clay/dirt/dust people like Adam(ah) made out of dirt of clay or dust (depending on the translation) animated by a life giving magical breathing called "rua(c)h" (רוּחַ) in the hebrew original. This is sometimes translated as spirit or more commonly as soul - this is why the ruach breathing is the besouling breathing in that mythological theme. The wind deity to animate or possess the earth figurines. The idea behind this is that breathing is invisible and magical (oxygen was unkown at the time the pagan mythology where the bible was copied from) so was the reason why we are breathing and how the lungs or blood works totally unkown beside that when you can't breath the life runs out. This is why plants or fish were not seen breathing with the naked eye and that is also why fruits and herbs and vegetables should nonliving food at the time before the sinfall event took place, where death was not in the world (to their interpretation) completely missing the point that plants and even their fruits/seeds are of course living cells, also breathing, but not be seen with the eyes of a bronze age observer. We as humans are made out of cells - like the first cell lifeform are we still like any other lifeform a cell subvariation. From the banana trees to the elephants are all still variations of eukaryote cells and remain cell structures. So to use the term loosely it is like that all animals, plants and fungi are still the "eukaryote kind". ;-) No one is today a dirt or clay or dust person like a golem monstrosity walking around infused by a magical spirit sometimes called soul as animation like the old book authors fantasized back the day.

[@stephenspackman5573]

@@Angelmou I wouldn't call the Bible “false” any more than I'd call The Lord of the Rings “false”. It is what it is. But yes.

[@davidfilicietti7168]

Both brain cells? I'm sure one of them is still in the original wrapping.

[@vesuvandoppelganger]

3:15 The different breeds of dogs were separately created.

[@Angelmou]

This is not how dog breeding works in reality like how the English hunting dogs such as the welsh terrier was bred in 23 generations with 2 scottich broodstocks into the Golden Retriever family dog. You truly do not care how breeding laws aka evolutionary mechanism do work and are used as tool.

[@Jeagan2002]

The fact you can see where a link is missing proves the chain works.

[@ASM42186]

Technically, "laws" in science only apply to things that can be demonstrated / described through mathematical calculations.

[@JimiBurleigh]

The result of a global flood would look more like an area called the "Channeled Scab Lands" in eastern Washington state.

[@lubrew5862]

In one of Kent’s other videos he brings a kid up on stage and shows him pictures of different animals. Kent then asks the kid which one is not part of the kind… the kid gets one of them wrong. It shows that Kent’s “kids know what a kind is” is disproven by a kid

[@raymondregis6219]

If you search 'polystrate fossils' you will mostly find creationist sites. Real scientific papers don't use that term so you wouldn't find alternate explanations.

[@PrometheanRising]

Funnily enough, rivers sometimes flow uphill.

[@mr.mcgurt2679]

Basic animal husbandry, that humans have practiced since 5000 bc completely debunks the ark story. It is NOT POSSIBLE to propagate a species from just 2 adult specimens, not now not ever.

[@mikeedmondson-sk8xt]

Noah's flood could not have formed horseshoe bends in the river.

[@bakerchiropractic1065]

“The surname Peterson has multiple ethnic origins, including Irish, British, Scandinavian, French, German, Eastern European, Italian, Spanish, Portuguese, Indigenous American, and Ashkenazi Jewish. “ “The surname Peterson may have originated from the Gaelic language and is a patronymic that means "son of Peter". The name Peter comes from the Greek word petros, which means "rock" or "stone". The surname may also have Irish origins, as it became more common in areas with large Irish diaspora communities. Over time, the name has absorbed cognates and derivatives from other languages, such as Pedersen and Pettersen from Norwegian and Danish, and Petersson and Pettersson from Swedish. “

[@tobias4411]

If any Christians in here, I have three simple questions... 1. Are African elephants, Asian elephants, mammoths, and mastodons the same kind of animal? 2. Are Cottontail rabbits and European rabbits the same kind of animal? 3. Are foxes and dogs the same kind of animal?

[@CeezGeez]

20:34 inceesty times

[@miskatonic_alumni]

Or, Magic Sky Man's Miraculous Mutant Menagerie

[@theboyyinlovee]

As a non American, your Kent imprrssion is uncanny

[@jhoughjr1]

Up there with kino casinos ralph impression

[@doranku]

When even YECs agree with actual science and think you are crazy ...

[@jdarmin]

boy you sure pulled out an old debate.. it's amazing to me that in all these years his talking points have not changed. you could set this video side by side with his current debates and not know which was older or newer if you blurred out the video.

[@colwem]

23:34 I think the main problem with the argument is that the mitochondrial eve phenomenon doesn’t mean that eve was the only woman alive at the time. Like your maternal grandmother is your only grandparent that you inherited mitochondria from . Does that mean you only had one grandmother?

[@Darth12000]

dogs aren't a species but a subspicies. The species they are part of is the wolf. So Kent accidentally highlighted the problem with not having a definition for "kind". He's going to talk about the dog kind (subspicies) and the cat kind (species) in the same breath...

[@TheAlbion666]

If Kent Hovind was formed in 15 minutes, wouldn't that be granting 14 minutes of extra credit to his father?

[@nolanbuval6295]

The intro brought me back to 2010

[@Lex_Taliones]

One thing you should start doing is link to the video. This says that although I’m not skipping anything that I believe to be relevant, here is the video, that way if you want, you can watch it in its entirety and judge for yourself.

[@dillon7748]

The one point I would disagree with planet about here is that there's nothing that fundamentally distinguishes us from other primates. I would say our ability to abstract to the point of conceptualizing and relating information in a narrative structure is unique in a fundamental way

[@Jo-JoandTaffy]

The only reason that we think we are special is because we are us. Chimpanzees think they are special because they are them. Nobody is better at being a chimpanzee than a chimpanzee.

[@jhoughjr1]

Ive said the story is our oldest and best invention. Also look around, we are vastly different to any extant primates.

[@vesuvandoppelganger]

3:00 It is impossible for things to be separately created with the same genes therefore it is evidence for evolution.

[@Angelmou]

This is like claiming that your uncle shall be poofed into being, because reality like the readable DNA heridity record shall not mean anything as everything and everyone shall be a deceit and the world could have been made as it is just 7 days ago by magic with all memories as such deceit. You know that you can't just declare the past & its readable heritage record with its readable common descent order to be open to be denied just for your personal faith. You wish your Ego and your subjective willpower feelings shall overrule over reality. Truth is independently of you to be even born correct. For example it was true that forests existed in the year 1700 long before you were born. So was dog breeding also the real deal before your very Ego existed in this world (despite you to be in denial of it in another post where you wrote "The different breeds of dogs were separately created." ) as you do not have any authority to just bear false witness about hard working humans. But you act that way for years without learning anything.

[@gilvertelland7272]

First of all ( a kind) is a branch of a species For example a black widow is a kind of spider But there are thousands of spiders with and they are the same species

[@Maxime-uo2iv]

Brother, you said something about examples of irriducible complexity having been observed in the lab. If you (or someone in the comments) can find the name of the examples, I'm very intriged to know more about them. Thank you !

[@LisaAnn777]

Honestly ive always been shocked that kent isn't a flat earther. Its very surprising.

[@reddblackjack]

Don't we share like 40% of our DNA with bananas. This guy literally is B.A.N.A.N.A.S. Thank you Gwen Stefani!

[@KhordLizardMage]

Kent complaining about how tax dollars is spent is pretty funny, since he went to prison for tax related issues.

[@henrim9348]

Project 2025 is all you need to know

[@jogsingumboots]

Hovind fully believes what he says

[@robertmcclintock8701]

(((^_^;) This is an artistic proof of a created universe. When you paint a shadow it's the opposite color of the object that made the shadow. Nobody knew what the opposite color of white was so the artists avoided painting white on white. The opposite color of white is baby blue and baby pink. The first artist to figure it out was Norman Rockwell. I was the second artist to figure it out. I saw it in the corner of a white room. The lighting was perfect to see it.

[@amandarhodes4072]

It's so funny when Hovind claims that a dog and a banana are not related. Go back far enough through ancestry and anything is related. Go back far enough and a Chameleon and a Triceratops are related. Go back far enough and a horse and grass are related. Go back far enough and a tree and a giraffe are related. Go back far enough and me and Hovind are related... Oh no what have I done! Just realised I'm related to Hovind... What do I do... Please help.

[@cajunqueen5125]

haha, I wonder if KH imagines all the evolutionary biologists are slapping their foreheads in dumbfound amazement, "wow, why didn't WE think of this???"

[@srStinnky]

5:38 so he can prove everything that the Bible says, other than “some dude wrote it ergo is truth”

[@louiechidwick6034]

Hi mate, greetings from the UK. Probably the best example on earth of what a 'catastrophic flood' can do is the topography of the "Channeled Scablands" of Eastern Washington which show ripples, channels and mounds across a huge area of land, which were caused at the end of the last ice age when glacial melt waters broke through massive ice dams, holding back vast lakes of melt water which had built up on the glaciers to the North of the region. Hovind still uses these pathetic arguments to the present day because he knows his followers will always fall for them.

[@Rosyna]

28:31 I think you need to wear an oven mitt or another soft implement if you’re ever going to cover Hovind again…

[@Lightbearer616]

Well that's obvious, got to go, cooking my steak in a bucket of water.

[@peterwyetzner5276]

The word "science" in Timothy is archaic- it's an Anglicized (or rather Gallicized" form of the Latin scientia, or knowledge, which in turn is a translation of the Greek gnosis.

[@JungleJargon]

In physics matter and energy cannot make or direct themselves. So there was a time when matter and energy were made as well as time itself since measurable time can’t exist without a great amount of matter. This means there was a time when time was made in the not too distant past. This shows that every physical thing is the result of a Creation. Only your Creator can perfectly cover for you Himself and remake you again from the inside out by the power of His true word as no one else ever can. This is the only absolute truth in existence.

[@thatgut2375]

7:00 Science never tries to "prove" anything. If your hypothesis works out after strenuous testing, you don't "prove" your hypothesis right, you fail to falsify your hypothesis

[@thatgut2375]

23:00 when asked about the out of Africa hypothesis along with the obvious incest problem and the diversity problem are all questions YEC "scientists" can't answer, they usually say "our scientists are working on it," because they can't say it happened without appealing to miracles, and they know that if they concede and appeal to a miracle, then it can't be science, thus their argument falls apart instantly, because you can't test -magic- sorry, MIRACLES

[@Spielkalb-von-Sparta]

If you "Kent" observe it it's not science!

[@Hscaper]

The reason isn’t is still valid is because he knows how to stir the pot and become relevant over and over.

[@Th3MrJ3st3r]

I'll delete this if Kent explains the up hill thing but my guess is, he's trying to be a smart alec and saying the only way the river would erode is if followed up either side of the canyon, basically resorting to an idea no one has, that no one agrees with to ridicule the idea it was anything other than the great flood story.

[@Th3MrJ3st3r]

Or maybe I'm giving him too much credit 🤷‍♂️

[@snipersougo13]

i would like to see kent answer to the pile of sand question

[@shockman8014]

About his brain cells, Did he let you tie one behind his back?

[@coldloyalty]

Lol not the tax dollahs

[@philipking7559]

So he says dogs only produce dogs, yet he says a dog and a wolf are a kind and there was 2 of every kind on the ark. So if you have 2 dogs on the ark to cover that kind and after to so called flood ended those 2 dogs had to breed to produce more of it's kind. That would also include wolves and foxes. But he said that dogs only produce dogs which means there would now not be any wolves or foxes and there clearly are. So there would need to be around 140,000 of each land mammal on the ark (280,000 if 2 of each (even more counting the 7 of each clean animal)) and with the measurements given in the bible there would be at most around 127,500 square feet of floor space which would not be enough room that amount of animals. Kents one liners and scams were wrong back in that video and his same old line he uses now are still wrong. Plus the only dinosaur in his dinosaur world is Kent.

[@Rosyna]

18:17 Geologists call them “upright fossils”, along with “T0 assemblages”.

[@freddoto]

KENT speaks fast to to confuse people

[@The-DO]

1 Tim (Bible) speaks of things that we know to be true about Salvation. It has nothing to do with "science" (speed of light, gravity...)

[@Crazael]

41:09 I mean, "science" does mean knowledge, so there could be a bible out there that uses it for some reason or other.

[@artax7664]

Being made of the same things and being directly related through common ancestry are not the same thing. Just because all life has genes and some are similar doesn’t necessarily mean they are directly related through common ancestry. The evidence for evolution is the same evidence for intelligent design from a common designer. I don’t think evolution necessarily debunks creation, I’m just being honest about the evidence. It’s about how you interpret it.

[@drsatan9617]

Wrong. All known lifeforms share 360 distinct genetic markers. Not similar ones We know they are all mutations of the original gene We have models explaining how mutations occur and none for any magical god creation, so it's incorrect to say both have the same standard of evidence You have only believe in intelligent design and no verifiable evidence

[@ricoyochanan]

When one claims evolution has been proven, then the question to ask them is which one of the conflicting THEORIES is the truth. Darwinism? Neo-Darwinism? Punctuated Equilibrium,?Epigenetics? Marshall's Evolution 2.0, Noble's Third Way.....? O what a ball of confusion!

[@drsatan9617]

Evolution as in the change in allele frequency within a population over time and generations The one which has over 550,000 supporting articles published to accredited science journal Pubmed alone, not including any other biology related journals

[@project_nihilist]

Kent doesn’t know what a prediction is. He says stuff we already and pretends he’s smart.

[@robertmcclintock8701]

( ;｀Д´) Artifacts of a swastika is flobby with stazzle and a jumble that tumbled. That is a skeleton, human heart, signature, internal combustion engine, animation of the big bang and a wave. That unify the universe you can't do with math. A swastika is the simplest rendering possible for those artifacts and needs to be saved.

[@clownmeat792]

Are they misrepresenting mankind with "kinds"

[@David_Shipley]

Dogs and wolves are the same kind? Ok, so dogs are wolves, we can both agree about that, but does that make wolves dogs? I'm sure we can both agree that wolves are not dogs, dogs obviously came after wolves, so you just proved that something can evolve from something similar. Now you just need to expand that to the logical extreme, and you have a far more accurate version of evolution than whatever you spew at your "lectures."

[@GodID7]

Bro is so simple.😂 A river above 2800ft can’t erode something of 7 to 8 thousand ft. And deposition by water occurs horizontally not by superposition. And you couldn’t even find the Kaibab trail that Hovind talked about. The highest point is 8000ft. How on earth you call Hovind and idiot when you can’t even listen correctly the argument. That’s why you attacked a straw man of the argument. So funny.

[@Phoennix3]

Kent has never seen species evolution, so he doesn't believe it. I would like to know when he observed gawd creating a universe.

[@jmirsp4z]

may i see the evidence for the 2nd brain cell of Kent please?

[@JPARnum1]

if god created everything, where are the unicorns?

[@parkerangel6315]

Update your pop filter

[@weirdwolly409]

41:45 I believe you are referring to al-Ghazali who wrote The Incoherence of the Philosophers. The mutazilites (Muslims had a lot of Greek influence (mostly Aristotelian) and consequently did a lot of science to understand the world better) had brought about the golden age of islam (because duhhhh science makes everything better) but then al-Ghazali ruined everything by saying that math and science are the devils work and the golden age of islam was over (because fundamentalism always makes everything worse).

[@ThePsyko420]

Um hovind did you know predictions come BEFORE a discovery?

[@hikarustarr]

please don't say "evidences." that's THEIR word, and completely incorrect.

[@kennywilliams123]

must be a MAGA member

[@connietrotterdedgrl6861]

Dude he is trying to sell home schooling instead of letting your child go to a public school and learn ridiculous science

[@jhoughjr1]

Im an outlier on the wais-III the main IQ test used. That being said, id be more qualified than most to homeschool but there is no way id presume to teach math as a math teacher or history as a history teacher

[@stefansmith4313]

Except science has evidence while you and conman not-a-real-doctor hovind have nothing.

[@miskatonic_alumni]

Kent wants kids brainwashed into believing Bronze and Iron Age folktales instead of learning real science based on real facts. FTFY

[@connietrotterdedgrl6861]

@@jhoughjr1 I meant he is selling a curriculum for home school like a workbooks and coordinating teacher guide. You do whatever is best for you and your family just don't buy stuff from a grifter. He knows what is proven science he's not a dumb guy

[@jeffgloverbjj]

You believe evolution? Even Darwin said his story had holes . You’re such a typical Marc.