killing people for oil seems pretty cringe actually

😎 SIGN UP TO CANVASS! www.vaush.gg/map
🔴 Website - www.vaush.gg/
💵 Patreon - / vaush
🌟 Other Socials 🌟
⭐️ Main Channel - / vaush
👀 3rd Channel? - / @vaushvidya
🐦 Twitter - / vaushv
👾 Twitch - / vaushvidya
📸 Instagram - / vaushv
🔵 Facebook - / vaushvidya
🎵 TikTok - / vaushvidya
🎙Podcast - anchor.fm/vaush
#vaush #vaushpit

[@lostonearth7856]

I demand for a new series where "Vaush reacts to the American military complex completely vaporize a country out of existence from the other side of the world while Russia fails to win a war with a country they're right next to."

[@nivelcourbiche6140]

Based america

[@kennedyshotfirst2534]

Stratofortress arc

[@atm1947]

Considering the fact that the level of superior firepower needed for Shock and Awe to work has only existed for the last 30 years, it would be hard to find any nations aside from Iraq that we actually did melt within weeks

[@soupman3285]

@@atm1947 Grenada and panama

[@archerfan66]

Vaush Limbaugh

[@wumbojet]

his famous nickname that many people say

[@michaelwerkov3438]

@@wumbojet I've always wanted it to catch on. It's so perfect. He has the Limbaugh voice. He's like Limbaugh, but bettaugh!

[@nolanstauffer9405]

Many people are saying this

[@Limbaugh_]

My last name is Limbaugh pog

[@TelPhi_]

First Vwonsh said racism was dumb, now Bawch is saying that KILLING is cringe? His takes are going too far already.

[@donjuan2371]

Seriously. He’s getting a bit too far left for my taste.

[@Darkerxz]

Brunch!!

[@jamesmcpherson8599]

Learned more about this war from this video than I did from my state education. I knew a bit about it but just took the standard "war for oil" line.

[@cass7448]

@@Ass_of_Amalek Yeah there's plenty of delusional crap out there. Unfortunately a lot of military history enthusiasts have not-great politics and they can sometimes let that affect their historical takes.

[@nocucksinkekistan7321]

Maybe learn to pay attention

[@jloiben12]

I saw Vaush watch the other videos first, and I went and watch the whole series of these videos, and I am so excited to be watching Vaush be like “wtf is this voodoo magic”

[@Xeridanus]

What?

[@jloiben12]

@@Xeridanus Vaush watched the ground war portion of this series of videos first. Then he watched this. Or at least that’s the order in which the videos were released. Between watching Vaush watch the ground invasion part and this video, I went and watched the entire series. I knew when I saw that he watch the air campaign portion that some of the things we did, ie - the technology of some of the assets we used, that he’d be like this is magic. And he did

[@Xeridanus]

@@jloiben12 Ah, that makes sense. It was a bit confusing what you were saying is magic. But I get it now.

[@SurelyYewJest]

Really puts into perspective the difference between being a #1 superpower, and being the runner-up. Now Russia historically has made some really stupid moves in the battles they've fought, but they've tended to have some halfway decent tech. Russia couldn't hope to come close to this level of dominance unless the territory being conquered were much, much smaller...like say, Georgia...

[@follower9698]

The Operations Room is an incredibly good channel, if you have any interest in recounts of some pretty famous/infamous battles, they do a solid job of covering most of the moving parts and context of the chosen topic.

[@moirakadhan745]

@Football-Pundit It wasn't such a mismatch numbers wise, and at the time a lot of "experts" were going on and on about how much of a paper tiger america was, relying too much on technology that'd actually fail on the field, as opposed to the "rugged" soviet ways. The pentagon itself expected to suffer higher losses, it really wasn't as clear cut back then as it is in hindsight.

[@moirakadhan745]

@Football-Pundit the iraqi army was one of the largest in the world at the time numbers wise. And yeah of course the vid and the reaction are in hindsight, that's exactly what I said lol.

[@moirakadhan745]

@Football-Pundit I think you're working with a lot of unwarranted assumptions and biases.

[@zacheryeckard3051]

@Football-Pundit I don't think you know as much about war and combat intelligence as you think.

[@rockmycd1319]

@Football-Pundit They literally did do surgical strikes? Do you think wars can be won without engaging an enemy’s ground force?

[@occasional_doomer]

I like Vaush covering stuff like this. One thing I don’t quite understand is the lumping in of the Gulf war with the 2003 invasion of Iraq by some on the left, equating both morally. Though there is undoubtably connections, the Gulf war was a justified, and UN sanctioned (unlike 2003) global response to Saddam’s illegal invasion of his neighbor Kuwait. There are parts worth criticizing (the Highway of death is usually what people point to), and the US was certainly motivated by selfish reasons to respond. But with all that said, Saddam’s effort to annex Kuwait failed as a result of the Global response. It’s one of the few instances of the UN system actually being able to enforce and stop something like what Saddam tried to do. I don’t think I’ve ever really seen an alternative response offered by those critical of the entire Gulf War that would have resulted in that failure for Saddam.

[@nuclearneo577]

Also if we didn't kick Saddam out of Kuwait, he would have invaded Saudi Arabia next and ended up controlling about a fourth of the world's oil supply. That would have made him far more dangerous then I think anybody can really comprehend these days.

[@rockmycd1319]

yes but you see, if Kuwait had just "negotiated" a peace deal with Iraq, everything would have been fine. Trust me bro.

[@LizStaples]

So one thing to help conceptualize why they are lumped together 1990-1991 Gulf War the internet was in its infancy, by 2003 internet was hitting its stride 2007 the first iPhone came out. The presidents at the time had the same name except for middle initial because the Bush’ are American dynasty of The Good Ole Boy Troupe. Many who comment on the conflict are too young to have been alive during Desert Storm. So they are going to assume it was equivalent.

[@JohnDoe-xv9du]

It is crazy tho that it just happened over some debt. Like lets annex due to some debt, and lets terraform due to debt

[@zenbear9952]

Keeping mind that Saddam was originally propped up and backed by the US as another proxy dictator for the US prior to Saddam stepping out of line. We created the monster and than we slew it twice

[@adezzz7896]

Why do people think the Highway of Death was a war crime? Retreating enemies are still legitimate military targets.

[@caesarplaysgames]

The Iraqis were not as militarily weak as a lot of people seem to think. They had the 4th largest military in the world in 1991, were well equipped with decent, well maintained, if somewhat outdated Soviet equipment, and remember that they had just finished fighting the 8 year Iran-Iraq war, one of the most brutal wars of the 20th century that is always overlooked or forgotten. This means many of them were battle hardened veterans. The Coalition did not come down with overwhelming force just to flex their might, they did it because they didn’t want to take any chances with the Iraqi military, which was capable of putting up a good fight if underestimated.

[@cruznix4741]

The precision of some of these strikes is terrifying. God help us all if a hot conflict between major powers breaks out

[@bananian]

Uh isn't precision a good thing? The alternative would be carpet firebombing.

[@fluffynator6222]

Why tho? Nowadays noone wants to waste their shells and rockets on civilian centers anymore.

[@LunaticTheCat]

I very much disagree. Precision striking limits civilian casualties, what is truly terrifying is what bombing campaigns were like before precision striking when entire cities had to be destroyed in order to destroy just a select few military targets.

[@kylegonewild]

I'd take precision strikes over napalm carpet bombing any day.

[@JiMMy-xd8nu]

@@kylegonewild Hear me out fellas, napalm? Or agent orange?

[@brendankendall41]

15:35 the anti-imperialism leaving my body when I see the cool shit our military has

[@jloiben12]

Russia: We are the second best military in the world. America: So you can successfully obliterate targets on the other side of the world? Ukraine: Lol they can’t even successfully invade their neighbors. America: Oh…. So Russia is 30+ years behind us

[@JohnDoe-xv9du]

Ukraine has 30 yo tech, its not even that

[@thatdognotthepuppy5809]

@@JohnDoe-xv9du A good chunk of Russian equipment currently being used in Ukraine is between 40 and 60 years old. No joke. A lot of vehicle failures seen this year are because they've been in storage without maintenance since the mid 70s, I'm not even exaggerating. The current service rifles of the Russian army *should* be the AK74M and the more recently adopted AK12, yet over 40% of captured Russian rifles can be dated to a 1970s or 1980s manufacturing date and have been shown to jam frequently. Don't even get me started on the conscript's weapons, I'm sure you've seen them.

[@Junebug89]

This is kinda cringe, but to be fair, not nearly as cringe as Russia.

[@PipoBones]

The operations room is one of my fav channels. I love a war being narrated in such a smooth way with so many cool details. Glad vaush found it and visits it more

[@maxfrankel5139]

When the Highfleet Strike Group music kicked in right at the start, the sense of impending doom was palpable

[@jakenorthand1755]

Got PTSD from that, was expecting the next line to be “our fuel tanks are burning!”

[@rupertpupkin1476]

Didn’t Iraq invade over oil though? Like America and other UN forces just protected Kuwait who was getting invaded. I understand it was in western interests to do this, but wasn’t it still aiding in the self defense of Kuwait?

[@kastanie7445]

Yes, both

[@dawildbear]

28:50 "Dude, I think we hit something"

[@ayyydriannn7185]

I had no idea this much fucking ammo was able to be used in such a short amount of time

[@RealmRabbit]

The tank armor situation is kinda like when they first invented ironclads... And like, you have these battles where ships will fire a ton of rounds at ironclads accomplishing pretty much nothing while the ironclad sinks their ship after firing just a few rounds... There was also a battle where you had two ironclads meeting each other in battle and not much really happening since they couldn't defeat each other...

[@wta1518]

Then there was that one wooden ship that cannon fire just bounced off of like an ironclad.

[@MoptopGames]

If anyone wants to know the pentagon does have contingency plans on every war scenario it could possibly face. It also has contingency plans on shit you wouldn’t expect like zombies

[@voiceofthelegion578]

I honestly think zombies is the one apocalypse that everyone would be somewhat prepared for.

[@kylegonewild]

There's a guy at NASA whose entire job is coming up with contingency plans for, and monitoring the likelihood of, existential threats to the US and humanity from space. Most of us never spend much time thinking about an asteroid impact wiping out 90-100% of humanity. That guy's job is to think about it every day.

[@jacobjohnston3983]

Yeah, like how it’s illegal to kill Bigfoot in Washington. Government can be wacky like that

[@Heldarion]

@@voiceofthelegion578 Due to the sheer amount of vidya games played. Nerds to the rescue!

[@voiceofthelegion578]

@@Heldarion and movies, shows and books. Plus everyone likes to imagine what they'd do if a zombie outbreak ever happened.

[@dev9619]

This guys voice sounds like a really good tts ai. I’m not convinced this is a real person. 😂

[@PhiOpsAurelio]

Would make a good Stellaris advisor voice.

[@bzzzzzzzzzz2075]

Now that you've said it I can't unhear it

[@FoxhoundIbby]

Years of Ace Combat have prepared me for this video. 😤

[@ji3194]

Yo buddy Still alive?

[@FoxhoundIbby]

@@ji3194 Oil too high? The Largest Military Coalition since WW2:

[@dasse8717]

I was in the Air Force in the late 90s, they brag about the Air Domination in their history they teach you in basic training. That is when I first learned we dropped way more bombs on Vietnam than all the Allies during WW2. They call them "sorties" whether its delivering supplies or dropping bombs, its a sortie and they think in Corporate ways of efficiency. Air Domination IS the reason America is an Empire, hands down, domination in space is second cause of things like GPS (An Air Force program) and even private companies in the game like Space-X and their low orbit internet satellites.

[@montymontague8526]

Don't think Highway of Death was war crime, just looked bad. Additionally while for oil, was based to liberate Kuwait.

[@AzureGreatheart]

I keep getting ads for the US Military that I can’t get rid of, so I’m watching this video which seemed critical of the military based on the title hoping that Google will finally get the hint.

[@lazulazu2467]

Saddam offered to sell oil for cheaper than Kuwait in a last ditch effort to prevent crisis from happening. If the war was truly only over cheap oil and not at all about Kuwait, why didn't we take the deal?

[@michaelvanderwal7390]

The highway of death was not a war crime. They were all legitimate military targets.

[@TSmith-yy3cc]

Broke: The music in the video is "Turjan Aylahn - Tanc a Lelek". Woke: This song is from the Highfleet soundtrack. Bespoke: This is the music from one of the best OKBV memes (by Juhzor).

[@Flugmorph]

gotta hand it to them, a logistical masterstroke.

[@fumanchu7]

That is actually the USA’s superpower. The ability to put any amount of force anywhere in the world and keep it there fully supplied indefinitely.

[@jyw0000]

Damn, if Vuš thinks Flak guns are cool, wait til he learns about the Phalanx CIWS system.

[@jyw0000]

@@Ass_of_Amalek nah. Not enough BRRRTTTTT

[@jyw0000]

@@Ass_of_Amalek lies. BRRRTTTTT is peak gun

[@timrideout5847]

The operations rooms is epic

[@Ninja-The-Red-Shinobi]

We fight for Goop that we refine into flammable liquid and plastic... super cringe.

[@LizStaples]

The modern world is a sci fi dystopia and this is more proof

[@Xaphnir]

It's not just reactive or ablative armor that makes modern tank armor better than steel. It's also composite armor, i.e. layers of different substances. This means that you need something that's good at penetrating all materials present in the armor, not just one.

[@OddHominum]

PETROLEUM ENGINEERING MAJOR HERE: You can and it definitely is plausible that They were “drinking their Milkshake” Thus why we have Mineral rights now. So you can sue someone to give back milkshake

[@KingUSMCO]

"war! huh! yeah!" America while doing a war.😄

[@clay6696]

love this

[@Ian_sothejokeworks]

Slanted oil drilling? Simpsons did it.

[@estinsidebottom]

Does Anybody Know Where I Can Find The Music At The Very Beginning? It's Appealing To Me For Whatever Reason.

[@j.f.fisher5318]

Cognitive dissonance Regarding tanks, the US Army did a study of an especially impressive battle called 73 Easting that concluded that if the US Army and Iraqi Republican Guard traded M1s for T-72s in the battle the end result would have been very similar but with 25% more casualties. While the tech gets the press, the real secret of America's success was superb training more than the quality of the tank.

[@dejeffmcbob]

@@Ass_of_Amalek Aiming which is done by the crew who have to be trained on how to effectively use the systems, in addition, the Iraqi tanks were using some of the worst shells the t-72 had which were on par with shells from the second world war when it comes to penetration ( 3VBM-3 )

[@j.f.fisher5318]

@@Ass_of_Amalek First, real word engagement ranges are seldom equal to the theoretical maximum range of the tank - notably this also hampered German heavy tanks designed for long range fighting on the eastern steppe when it came time to fight in the more restricted terrain of Europe. It's one of the reasons Shermans so frequently roflstomped Panthers despite the German tanks' apparent superiority on paper. But I digress. The study may still be available online. Reading between the line I took it as the Army making the case that if they face budget cuts they'd rather get their budget for upgraded tanks cut instead of their budget for training. They ran 2 versions of the battle in a detailed simulation (and since this was done by the Army they know exactly what their armor packages gun performance, etc are). One version they had each vehicle in the battle do exactly what was done in real life but swapped tanks. The other version they kept the US forces in M1s but made them make typical rookie mistakes like not coordinating their attack so all the tanks engaged at once to overwhelm the Iraqi line and in that scenario they did much worse but I don't remember the details. I assume that the US tankers were generally not taking frontal shots against enemy tanks anyway, so not having the best armor and gun wasn't as much of a handicap as we might have expected. I bring this up because it runs counter to the narrative of the military-industrial complex.

[@yingfortheking]

11:15 "i mean, theyre in an office all day, they gotta do something" Tfw your busy work is writing up invasion plans for a country you didnt know existed till a week ago.

[@protonneutron9046]

Yes, Iraq started a war over oil. E.G. wanting to steal Kuwait's oil. They then refused UN order to leave so were forces out by military action under U.N. orders.

[@500iqplay6]

The FLAK canons you showed in the end were made by the same company wich made the bulk of German tanks during WW2. They made a new Tank recently and it is said to be the strongest tank in the world right now. This tank is highly controversial though, because Rheinmetall, the company that made it, dubbed it "Panther", like a Nazi tank they made in WW2.

[@semirrahge]

Vaush LazerPig crossover episode when?

[@LizStaples]

Boeing B52 Stratofortress maiden flight 1952. WW2 had shown us the need for longer range bombers and we answered that pretty quickly. Tomahawks were developed in 1983 so by Desert Storm they had almost a decade under their belt. I’ve done a deep dive recently on current military development and I didn’t even know the MDA (Missile Defense Agency) was a thing to be fair it only got named that in 2002, came out of the old Star Wars Program Aka Strategic Defense Initiative, I was always told the Star Wars Program was a marketing scam that killed the USSR but it seems like they did have some meat on them bones after all.

[@Snorlaxx64]

The voosh war arch is pretty great so far.

[@WolfShadowhill]

To sum up this is why we don’t have health care in the US

[@protonneutron9046]

wrong! The US has such good healthcare that my local, one strip airport is clogged with German's arriving on non-stop flights to use the HC we have here in our little city. Rent an education

[@carlcarlington7317]

I’m still convinced we didn’t have to go THIS hard in dessert storm. Like Jesus man

[@Hawkm0th]

Ngl, the music in that video you showed us really slaps

[@marc400]

Afaik and this might be a myth. The bradleys lost in the first gulf war were friendly fire too, because some abrams gunners were trained to shoot anything that isnt an M1.

[@davidradtke160]

96 killed by the enemy, 105 killed by friendly fire or other accidents.

[@rolthox]

That looked like it hit the side skirt on the tank. That wouldn't do shit

[@ladymorwendaebrethil-feani4031]

28:15 the lyrics of this music in english probably is basicaly the same of some gospel music from a evangelical church.

[@blodstainer]

too be clear! the self- destructed tanks were destroyed because they ran on mines. those mines are way cheaper than the threads and repair cost

[@gabealls4771]

anyone know the name of the song at the start of the vid?

[@SpencerHHO]

The US could give Ukraine Abrahams and they can be airlifted (I think) although that's very expensive. The main issue with Abrahams for Ukraine is that they are so drastically different than Soviet tanks it would be a logistical nightmare. The training would basically need to be from scratch but the main issue is maintenance and repair. Sure major repair could be done in Poland or Europe but you still need specialist mechanics and engineers to keep them running in the field. They use a turbine engine which is completely different than the diesel engines used by pretty much every other country except some US allies. The Abrahams are also extremely fuel thirsty, they are fast and powerful but moving around 70 metric tonnes powered by a jet engine at speed isn't exactly energy efficient. It's the reason the US wants Germany to give Ukraine the Leopard tanks as they have a conventional diesel engines but are still far superior to Soviet and Russian tanks they are also lighter than the Abrahams so less likely to get bogged down and more fuel efficient.

[@Nirakolov]

6:00 ish - when the entire sky is planes... yes, AA guns gunna hurt

[@kingdewb6692]

Re-upload?

[@Disthron]

About the tanks, didn't a similar thing happen with air craft in the second Iraq war? My understanding was that all the aircraft losses were due to accidents or pilot error?

[@valiantshadowproductions]

Hell yeah.

[@sergio24m]

Isn't this man literally Senator Armstrong

[@jloiben12]

7:30 True! Russia can’t even do what we did some 30 years ago lol

[@jloiben12]

@@Ass_of_Amalek And there are even smaller countries than Russia that can do this so this isn’t a particularly good point

[@themanwithoutaplan9389]

@@Ass_of_Amalek Ukraine is using second hand gear to basically reverse the Russian advance. Damn good example right there, smaller population, less gdp, and smaller military. Even with American and European funding it’s a damn good fight their putting up.

[@LunaticTheCat]

@@jloiben12 Uhm, no, this is something that the US and only the US was capable of doing. No other military comes even close.

[@jloiben12]

@@LunaticTheCat You do know America wasn’t the only country involved in Desert Storm, right? I mean I get it is popular to be so American-centric that you don’t even know that anything else exists but even if we just limit it to Desert Storm, this demonstrates how you are wrong

[@jloiben12]

@@Ass_of_Amalek (1) “that can do what?” That can effectively use force against a competent opposing party. (2) You know America wasn’t the only country involved in the Gulf War, right? Even if I were to play along with you misrepresenting what I said, you would still be wrong. Your misrepresentation, besides not being an accurate understanding of what is being said, is factually incorrect too.

[@jizburg]

One of my co worker is from iraq, he said that day one of the air campaign was insane.

[@aaronp8874]

A lot of bombers have stealth capabilities and can fly incredibly high. I don't think even the best AA can combat that. Of course they aren't as common and are insanely expensive.

[@DiaJasin]

Why aren't these videos on Vaush's channel?

[@minecraft2895]

Am I the only one mindblowned that Explosive Reactive Armor is a real thing? O_o I knew the concept because it is an option in D20 Mecha, but I thought it was just Sci-fi and not an existing tech! That's so cool!

[@thatdarnskag5043]

Anime type shit where you counter the enemy's attack with your defensive explosion.

[@luKASIM23_2]

gotta love a man becoming enamored by the military industrial complex.

[@factsmachine9905]

You dont say?

[@jacobaurelius5361]

20:32 no that’s incorrect Though the gulf war was quite massive the largest mechanized conflict was still world war 2 and by a significant margin (like a factor of 10), the gulf war comes in at a distant second

[@LizStaples]

World War 2 having two fronts gives it that advantage. If you split the fronts into their own wars European and Pacific how would they measure up?

[@SpencerHHO]

I think he's confusing it for the largest tank on tank battle which did happen in the gulf war.

[@Gear3k]

@@SpencerHHO The largest tank on tank battle was Kursk.

[@jordanclark4635]

The thing to bare in mind is that proportionally countries don’t have the same number of tanks and planes as in the 30s and 40s due to it being more effective to build more high tech tanks that take more time to produce but wouldn’t melt against modern armaments

[@user-sm8us5yt9h]

You might be mixing up mechanized and motorized. There is a distinction. There weren’t many mechanized units in WW2 they were mostly motorized so it might actually be a true statement on Iraq

[@posscore]

*starts video* *immediate Tanc al Lelek* This is going to be a good one

[@jimbo2227]

It wasn’t a Bradley

[@forsaturn4629]

The highway of death, the majority is actually not civilians but Iraqi soldiers trying to get out using whatever vehicle they stole in kuwait

[@tristenarctician6910]

What is this music

[@RuneFoot]

Its not copy right. I'm like 90% sure it's highfleat soundtrack

[@caeruleanull6472]

If you or an editor could link videos that you watch in the description or a pinned comment that would be much appreciated!

[@jloiben12]

And there were idiots under the other video saying to me how Russia tried to do what we did in Desert Storm…

[@jloiben12]

@@Ass_of_Amalek You’re trying to prove my point, right?

[@jloiben12]

@@Ass_of_Amalek Then why did you provide evidence that supports my position?

[@jloiben12]

@@Ass_of_Amalek So you are just cope posting now since you know that your response provided evidence that supports the position and being wrong in public triggers you. Or I guess you are just smart enough to read the literal first comment. Got it.

[@iamkrohn]

TLDR: Don't piss off the United States or we invade you.

[@ehs_phantasi2132]

Laush Vimbaugh

[@Dr_Clevins]

There’s an “is/ought” gap in our Iraq involvement. While I agree with the sentiment that war over oil is lame af. The fact is that oil is a major international commodity, and Saddam is a murderous despot. If we ceded the oil our country relies on to an autocrat we jeopardize our entire society. All the more reason to work towards being less oil dependent. But ultimately the selfish cause of fighting over oil was the pragmatic move on the part of the US. Was it morally justified? Maybe in some instances, but largely not. It’s one of those issues I’m torn over. I hate that we like to play world police, but at the same time, do we just let Saddam do whatever he wanted? Breaking the statutes of the Geneva convention multiple times in a conflict that if we did nothing could leave him in sole control of a significant amount of oil wealth thus crippling nations across the globe? Just more arguments for border abolition I guess. I’m rambling, someone shut me up

[@chengzhou8711]

Operations Room usually does a pretty good job on reporting about war stuff i think

[@millennialmongoose3392]

Vaush rts arc?

[@jacobaurelius5361]

Operations room is a good fucking channel for any military ops shit

[@caad5258]

nice, Highfleet is rad

[@ottoernst6707]

Maybe we can make an exception Saudi Arabia

[@tommytom4893]

The Gulf War 378 dead for the Coalition 25,000 dead for the Iraqi military Seems pretty fuckin based

[@Lambda_Ovine]

I just can't get over the dissonance that is America when it comes to the quality of life and... idk, the character of its citizens or whatever, that you would expect from a country with seemingly endless resources and power Like, if you were to do a world building exercise for a fictional universe, and you were to make a civilization that is, at that time, militarily and economically the most powerful in the history of its world, how would you expect the civilian society to be? You'd expect them to at least have access to health care as needed and reliable public transport and a generally well off in education, housing blah blah... but instead we have... America lmao

[@XxAverageJoexX]

You have access to all those things. Get a job and pay for them like everyone else. Many people don’t want the government running our medical system. The VA is proof of that. Also the USPS, DMV etc.. you’re also able to move to any other country you’d like.. maybe do that?

[@Music-xp5wg]

React to kings and general roman civil war videos Vaush.

[@Kuhanapomaranca]

well, unless i'm getting the oil, then its based

[@iannordin5250]

Highway of Death wasn't a warcrime.

[@christian2i]

Say what now

[@eldritchhero8120]

Isn't this music a groyper meme? Lmao

[@guyintenn]

Killing people for land, resources, and ideology is as old as humanity itself. This has gotten more advanced and efficient as time progressed. I really don't see that changing anytime in the foreseeable future, cringe or not.

[@ianmcninch8070]

I'ts kind of depressing that the pinnacle of human technology and engineering is mostly put towards killing machines.

[@georgekingiv8171]

That is not true.

[@XxAverageJoexX]

😂 you should probably look into how most medical tech got invented. That’s right, military research. Good try though.

[@avocadocrumch]

bababooey

[@chadsimmons4496]

The comment section is alarming. How many of you would support a Haitian “liberation” of the Dominican Republic? Or a Cuban “liberation” of Puerto Rico?

[@WhiffenC]

God damn dude, this was pure domination. I feel for the people of Iraq

[@danieltobin4498]

What about the people of Kuwait? Ya know. The country that Saddam invaded, conquered, and bullied into submission? The whole reason the Persian Gulf War started in the first place?

[@kastanie7445]

@@danieltobin4498 possible to feel for both, ya know. Especially since the ordinary people have literally no say in what the dictator decides

[@danieltobin4498]

@@kastanie7445 Possibly but the people of Kuwait were the ones who were conquered by said dictator. Saying you feel for the people of Iraq and seemingly forget about the people of Kuwait points to a lack of understanding of the broader context at best.

[@kastanie7445]

@@danieltobin4498 I agree with you, but if this person can feel bad for the people of Iraq, then probably at least as much for the people of Kuwait

[@Ghee_Buttersnaps]

When will you stop being so controversial Vaush 👊😔

[@davitdavid7165]

Vaush is doing a lot of controversial takes recently. What happened?

[@davitdavid7165]

@@Ass_of_Amalek this is poking fun at how the titles of this video and the "racism is bad" are so uncontroversial it is almost boring.

[@davitdavid7165]

@@Ass_of_Amalek that's sorta the point though. The premises is so obvious and you think "how can he talk about that for 40 minute?" It is clickbaity, but there are no lies told.

[@carlwheezer1030]

@@Ass_of_Amalek the joke flew so over your head that the op didn't even bother responding to your trash bait

[@axolotlaristotle]

I mean Trump gave the game away years ago when he said we were going to make sure we got the Syrian oil.....

[@nikcile4034]

you ever wonder if bush started the iraq war cus he thought sadam was darth vadar?

[@Josep_Hernandez_Lujan]

Chauvinism