Kishore Mahbubani - Common Prosperity

[@0157matt]

Common Prosperity is interesting , could well work , it's a way to help the lower end of society.... China leaders are quite innovative ...

[@zenlei8258]

Are you naive ? China have 200 red billionaires is consider common prosperity, surely not. Common prosperity is the code word for communist system, not even socialist system. China is going to to Marxist communist system.

[@leowtaimeng811]

Never a supporter of CCP and Xi. But with the Common Prosperity is good If done in good faith the upgrade the bottom 50% to be more competitive

[@shumyinghon]

i believe its another method of 'communism' -- by dishing out equal opportunities to create wealth, to create 'communal' wealth. They have twisted and modified Marxism to the situation in China. The CCp can still carry on to rule by making everyone wealthy and happy. Win Win!

[@0157matt]

Communism is just a system of government , nothing evil , it's the leaders who could be corrupt , maybe Mao was corrupted but not president Xi who brought millions of poor people out of poverty. no one has succeeded in lifting so many out of poverty.

[@walterlim4313]

Common prosperity means communism, means no innovative, see what Chairman Mao period, he achieved common prosperity 100%

[@MagSnapShots]

Common prosperity is a learning not just from the US, but also from the mistakes of China's past - the time in the 1930s when the KMT government became a plutocracy (government ruled by top 1%) and eventually imploded.

[@kanpakloy8212]

It is common Chinese belive that when one succeed in live in term of wealth & live, one should contribute back towards humanity to repay nature. That way, there is good will within one's life & is nature karma is gratified by our action. To look down on other who r less fortunate & bully other's to gain the ill gain fortune will result in karma rejection on US or US. Can batanly see this.

[@lisa.e5776]

Agree. Sea people

[@zenlei8258]

China is bullying those Africans in BRI countries and get them into high debt and help some African leaders corrupt and hide wealth overseas. Get your facts revised.

[@charlizet4314]

@@zenlei8258 China didn’t force anyone to take up their offer to built infrastructures. That is the key difference. Each has their own power to negotiate the terms. The one who needs to get facts revised seem to be you. Interview on China investment in Africa from the latter’s point of view kzbin.info/www/bejne/hILEoGd6d8iEi6c.

[@jacintochua6885]

Deng proposed this stages. He declared it was okay for a portion of people or sectors to prosperity first and then the rest will catch up. The plan is to avoid large enterprises to monopolize business and results in concentrated power or wealth. USb tried it too when Roosevelt broke up large corporations which became too large, and Reagan regulated the break up of Bell. This was to prevent monopolies. It's no longer being done and huge monoliths were protected by huge loans when they failed. The catch word and justification became : too big to fail. It happened to Chrysler and later on to numerous banks during the financial melt down in 1987 and again in 2008. Large corporations now dictate policies in the US.

[@zenlei8258]

Does Deng proposal works ? No. All princelings abuse their privileges to make as much money as possible. Look at Evergrande build forever even though not sure where are the buyer from. There is no such thing as common prosperity.

[@urimtefiki226]

Respect for Konrad Adenauer, I think he is the second smartest statesman after Bismarck. Germany is beautiful place for living and working, has many museums and castles and is the place of many philosophers, compositors and scientist. German people are very creative and have very high IQ, place with many geniuses. (Schopenhauer, Rontgen, Diesel, Siemens, Carl Orff).

[@gregwang8628]

Common prosperity here😅

[@victoews6842]

China the builder has 18.47% of the world population. USA the bomber has 4.25% of the world population. The family of humanity ( the 95.75%) needs to discipline or at minimum contain it's belligerent bother the bomber.

[@wyodragon4325]

China is a civilised country. It cooperates peacefully with other countries for the benefits of the World in general. Its BRI project is the largest infrastructure project which aims at improving the welfare of the World. It is an inclusive project. It welcomes any country that wants to participate in it. The latest country that has joined it is Syria. By contrast, the US and its vassals (AKA the western countries) are not civilised countries. They are vulgar barbaric gangs of thieves and murderers. They use brute force to steal the wealth of other countries. They have been doing it over the past 500 years since Spain sent its conquistadors to steal gold and silver that belonged to the Mayans and the Aztecs. They invade and Bomb non-western countries, they kill the people of non-western countries, they steal the wealth of non-western countries, they destroy the livelihoods of the people of the non-western countries, and they impoverish the people of the non-western countries while they themselves become rich with the wealth they steal.

[@thisiskevin1000]

The old colonial powers have to listen to dissenting views from anti-war activists to citizens from countries once part of their respective empires at the peak of colonization. A dawn of multipolarism is waving

[@AvernusAres]

America 4.25% of world population but consumes 25% of world resources LOL and responsible for the worst eco crisis in human history.

[@gregwang8628]

Why is common prosperity so hard to fathom in the God’s chosen people’s world?

[@rogelee-TW]

👍👍👍👍👍✌️✌️✌️✌️✌️

[@ricotheman8139]

Very good explanation of 摸着鹰酱过河

[@thisiskevin1000]

One should look at the case of some developed countries such as the US, Turkey and Israel with their stubbornly high Gini coefficient rates, and emerging markets like Brazil, Russia, South Africa, Mexico, Argentina, Chile, Colombia, Venezuela and Ecuador. Why does wealthy inequality exists in these countries and regions?

[@zenlei8258]

Many not aware, China growth was supported by greedy Wall Street bankster, by partnering with princelings, who have given loan of over $1 trillion to China since 2003. Without these loan from Wall Street bankster, China will not have any growth and stagnant.

[@boyah5316]

Kishore understands China, although he is not a Chinese. In fact, many Chinese especially Singapore Chinese should feel ashamed of themselves.

[@toycreator]

Pro Mahubani, you really not a friend of China because you keep telling..repeatly..the secrets of the Chinese success 🤣🤣

[@leongsong5756]

Ha ha ha

[@fromtheoutside37]

How come according to Li Keqiang ( 李克强 )there still 40% of Mainlanders living bellow USD5.25 per day?

[@yiquny]

I hope I will have the chance to visit relatively poor areas in China to see. I do know east coast of China from Hong Kong/Guangdong to Sandong, but these are not the poorest provinces. If you want to take a vacation, may consider China. I am sure people there will be very friendly to you. Also you will be very safe there.

[@sinbinny]

Hence the common prosperity campaign, duh!

[@jameslum7260]

Such uneducated question begs the question of the level of brain matter( or the lack of it)of the questioner. But sufficiently smart for the title of village idiot perhaps.

[@fromtheoutside37]

@Sauvagesse B2c Coste Fat chance.

[@blackknight4996]

What "how come"? Obviously you don't understand the topic

[@megstlimlim3386]

Poor Indian shops chase out US Tech giants