"If it's Boeing, I'm not going". That's all about it. Good decision from KLM!
@FLIGAVIA2 ай бұрын
✈️✈️✈️
@kwekzy_82982 ай бұрын
The NG 737 were very safe and capable aircraft’s, max has some problems tho. So I’m happy with the choose that KLM made.
@RoberHubbard2 ай бұрын
KLM’s decision to adopt the A321neo reflects broader trends in the aviation industry. It’s great to see airlines investing in newer, more efficient aircraft.
@Shidoariari2 ай бұрын
The higher capacity of the A321neo should help KLM accommodate more passengers and improve profitability on busy routes.
@FLIGAVIA2 ай бұрын
thanks
@Titot1822 ай бұрын
Boeing should have just marketed an exclusive model for KLM - the 737 - MAX - Verstappen. They would have definitely filled the order books with that
@Anemoi12 ай бұрын
HA! nice
@sharladam2 ай бұрын
KLM’s switch to the A321Neo is a smart move given the issues with the older B737 fleet.
@FLIGAVIA2 ай бұрын
thank for your comment
@OfficialDoggyYT2 ай бұрын
any old aircraft will have issues such as old airframe etc, the reason the A320 has less crashes is because the 737 came out in late 60's, a year where commercial jet aviation was new. compared to the A320 1984 which came in a time where aviation was more advanced.
@miks5642 ай бұрын
@@OfficialDoggyYT Not really. A320 are much safer planes because they’re modern redundant fly by wire machines with many software protections since the first day they were introduced back in the late 80s. A Max is still the old cables and pulleys concept. It’s the oldest tech aircraft Boeing still produces, it doesn’t even feature a EICAS, something even 757 and 767 already have. Except for the Max (because MCAS), 737s are good reliable planes, but they’re like a good vehicle from the 70s restored with more modern and efficient engines.
@OfficialDoggyYT2 ай бұрын
@@miks564 exactly what I said, the A320 came out in a time where commercial jet aviation was somewhat new, the technological advanced etc, you just proved my point. If it was the other way around you can bet the A320 would have more crashes
@CatenaTrentini2 ай бұрын
This move by KLM to the A321Neo is a win for passengers too - more comfort and better service on flights!
@FLIGAVIA2 ай бұрын
Thanks for sharing your thoughts!
@XiaomingYange2 ай бұрын
The transition from the 737 to the A321Neo is huge for KLM. Can't wait to see these new planes in action!
@FLIGAVIA2 ай бұрын
Thanks.
@esperanzaakeelah2 ай бұрын
The detailed breakdown of KLMs transition plan was very informative. This decision seems well thought out.
@dennismukul2 ай бұрын
Standardizing the fleet across the Air France-KLM Group makes a lot of sense for operational efficiency.
@FLIGAVIA2 ай бұрын
thank for your feedback
@benedictton2 ай бұрын
The fuel efficiency of the A321Neo is a huge advantage for KLM. Great decision!
@paulfernando18872 ай бұрын
KLM moving to airbus with the NEO is the perfect choice. 🇳🇱
@FLIGAVIA2 ай бұрын
thanks for feedback
@GennaStuar2 ай бұрын
Can’t wait to see the A321Neo in KLM colors!
@jamesbartlett56402 ай бұрын
You did in the video unless you mean with your own eyes and not a video 😅
@FLIGAVIA2 ай бұрын
Is it beautiful right?
@UriLettiere2 ай бұрын
The instability with the B737 Max definitely pushed KLM towards Airbus.
@FLIGAVIA2 ай бұрын
thanks for your comment
@gerardkruithof12 ай бұрын
Flying is an acceptable risk, but flying with Boeing means pushing the limits of what is acceptable. Passenger comfort, safety and sense of security should not be underestimated. With Boeing that is long gone.
@TerttuHarju2 ай бұрын
I'm glad KLM chose the A321Neo. It’s a more environmentally friendly option and will save them money in the long run.
@IndrajMakwana2 ай бұрын
It’s interesting how the Boeing 737 Max issues pushed KLM towards Airbus. Sometimes competition benefits everyone.
@FLIGAVIA2 ай бұрын
true
@jeremyjerry112 ай бұрын
The environmental benefits of the A321Neo align well with KLM’s sustainability goals.
@FLIGAVIA2 ай бұрын
thank for your comment
@DaisyLillie-f7i2 ай бұрын
The transition plan for KLM’s new fleet seems well thought out and strategic.
@FLIGAVIA2 ай бұрын
thanks for your comment
@OfficialDoggyYT2 ай бұрын
it doesnt seem well thought out neither is it strategic especially because of the airline itself which is mainly Boeing based
@RICHM7BV72 ай бұрын
Is Airbus a321 neo right for KLM? Absolutely!
@FLIGAVIA2 ай бұрын
thanks
@AlvesAlmeidase2 ай бұрын
KLM’s switch to the A321neo makes a lot of sense given the fuel efficiency and environmental benefits. Excited to see how this impacts their operations!
@TuuliHuovinen2 ай бұрын
KLM’s transition plan seems well thought out. Phasing out older 737s while integrating new A321neos will help ensure a smooth transition.
@RealMash2 ай бұрын
Not to forget that the Airbus planes (except the 220 which probably will be overhaled soon) can be flown with minimal training on each type. That is waht Boing tried to do with the MCA sor their 737 and the new Max planes. They failed to do it successfully because tey were to cheap and did not do it properly. People died due to this. I would not fly a Boeing for the foreseeable future-except the 747. That is so old, it has matured enough to work.
@atonaljenn2 ай бұрын
The A321Neo’s range and performance make it a perfect fit for KLM’s European routes.
@FLIGAVIA2 ай бұрын
thank for your feedback
@ManakoInagaki2 ай бұрын
The flexibility and performance of the A321Neo make it a versatile aircraft for KLM's diverse route network. A well-thought-out decision!
@FLIGAVIA2 ай бұрын
Thanks for your comment
@AtsueKozawa2 ай бұрын
As a fan of aviation, I'm excited to see KLM embracing the A321Neo. This aircraft has a lot to offer in terms of efficiency, range, and passenger comfort.
@FLIGAVIA2 ай бұрын
Thanks for your comment
@UltimateSeduction2 ай бұрын
... and safety.
@CuroFernaness2 ай бұрын
With the A321neo’s extended range, KLM will be able to explore new routes and offer better connectivity. This is a smart move for their fleet strategy.
@GayHalligan-oo3te2 ай бұрын
It’s interesting to see KLM shift towards Airbus after so many years with Boeing. The A321neo’s advantages make it a compelling choice.
@erika3kmz2 ай бұрын
KLM’s decision to move away from Boeing shows how competitive the aviation industry is.
@FLIGAVIA2 ай бұрын
thanks for sharing
@OfficialDoggyYT2 ай бұрын
KLM's decision to move away from Boeing shows what for L they are.* Moving away from a company you have been working with ever since 1920 is a backstab.
@gary1amf2 ай бұрын
Excited to see how the A321Neo will enhance KLM’s operations and passenger experience
@FLIGAVIA2 ай бұрын
same here
@rishimationa862 ай бұрын
KLM’s switch to the A321 Neo could be a game-changer for the airline. Excited to see how it impacts their operations.
@FLIGAVIA2 ай бұрын
cant wait to see new airplane
@ngnagchannel-qh4fb2 ай бұрын
Wow, KLM switching from the B737 to the A321Neo is a big move! Curious to see how this will affect their operations.
@FLIGAVIA2 ай бұрын
thanks for your feedback
@narmerjimz6892 ай бұрын
I really love to see KLM airplanes, their light blue livery looks SO GOOD! It’s one of the best !
@FLIGAVIA2 ай бұрын
Thanks for your comment
@SahilKumar-nj5om2 ай бұрын
Fuel efficiency and lower operating costs make the A321Neo a smart choice. Good move, KLM!
@FLIGAVIA2 ай бұрын
thanks for your feedback
@PhilipAlvers2 ай бұрын
On a neo last year(2023) to Pathos, Cyprus; lovely flight!
@KauaAzevo2 ай бұрын
The A321neo’s improved capacity and noise reduction features are impressive. KLM’s passengers will likely appreciate the more comfortable and quieter flights.
@FLIGAVIA2 ай бұрын
do you like A321Neo?
@nielsabbas71662 ай бұрын
I think you have to redo your homework. 😉 Pieter Elbers left KLM in june 2022 and nowadays he is the ceo of Indigo.
@FLIGAVIA2 ай бұрын
many thanks for your feedback
@AnitaSasi2 ай бұрын
KLM's shift to the A321Neo shows their commitment to efficiency and sustainability. It's great to see airlines making choices that benefit both their operations and the environment!
@chris1978nl2 ай бұрын
For long time i may say i am fan of Boeing, but since the problems that Boeing cannot solve and the good developments at Airbus i can no longer say that. Also, support your local, and together with Air France, KLM has a great deal for the choice to switch over. Transavia also did a great job to switch over to the Neo's. Thumbs up for both. Wish them both many safe flight hours.
@FLIGAVIA2 ай бұрын
thanks so much for sharing
@Advancedkid2 ай бұрын
can you explain how and when did Transavia switch from Boeing 737s to the A321 Neos??
@chris1978nl2 ай бұрын
@@Advancedkid Transavia has received its first 321 Neo last november, the phasing out will take a while, but the proces is going on right now.
@bigdogboos17 күн бұрын
A321 is the all around best jet out there. it's not a wide body jumbo, but has good capacity, great range, fuel efficiency, and quiet. can't compare
@KayoMatsumura2 ай бұрын
KLM's fleet upgrade to the A321Neo reflects the evolving needs of the aviation industry. Modern, efficient aircraft are the way forward.
@HideyasuKotani2 ай бұрын
KLM embracing the A321Neo is a bold move. The increased range and capacity will definitely enhance their network.
@FLIGAVIA2 ай бұрын
Thanks for your sharing✈
@sanjaychauhan68092 ай бұрын
As a frequent KLM flyer, I'm excited to experience the A321Neo. I’ve heard great things about its performance.
@FLIGAVIA2 ай бұрын
thanks for your sharing
@edwardsy6h9582 ай бұрын
Its fascinating to see KLM transition from Boeing to Airbus. The A321 Neo’s advantages are clearly compelling!
@tomajornea87102 ай бұрын
Come on, right now you gotta be really confident to fly new Boeing planes given all that has spilled out of their backyard. I certainly avoid the MAX and will keep doing that for many years. The fact that the producer basically lied to the operators and the authorities is brutal and reduces to zero the confidence. The NEO has simply bigger+more efficient engines, and for a few generations this has been enough to compel operators to new planes, since fuel is their biggest spending. The NEO with its fuel efficiency is like a Small Dreamliner or A350, very suitable to long point to point routes.
@PradipAnchanАй бұрын
Airbus Rocked ♥️🔥 Boeing Shocked 💀☠️
@HatsumiSanya2 ай бұрын
KLM switching to the A321Neo is a smart move. The fuel efficiency and modern features are unbeatable!
@FLIGAVIA2 ай бұрын
Yes.
@AsfourCowper2 ай бұрын
The broader strategy of fleet standardization makes a lot of sense.
@FLIGAVIA2 ай бұрын
✈
@EricaRizzor2 ай бұрын
The transition to a more environmentally friendly fleet is a smart move by KLM.
@FLIGAVIA2 ай бұрын
✈
@chris1978nl2 ай бұрын
they also are a bit forced to do so. Government is partly stakeholder who has also their own agenda on emissions etc.
@MamioNishikawa2 ай бұрын
The issues with the older B737 fleet make this decision understandable.
@CaciliaRocar2 ай бұрын
The A321Neo is a great choice for KLM. I'm excited to see how this impacts their operations and passenger experience.
@FLIGAVIA2 ай бұрын
🛩🛩
@JosefiinaAhlberg2 ай бұрын
The decision to move away from the 737 to the A321neo shows KLM’s commitment to modernizing its fleet. Great choice for reducing costs and improving performance.
@FLIGAVIA2 ай бұрын
yep
@KiranP-s6s2 ай бұрын
KLM’s move to A321Neo shows how airlines need to adapt to stay competitive and environmentally friendly.
@FLIGAVIA2 ай бұрын
thanks for your feedback
@kishorthakur88552 ай бұрын
KLM always strives for the best, and switching to the A321Neo proves they’re committed to innovation and efficiency.
@FLIGAVIA2 ай бұрын
thanks for your feedback
@Rob-yj9ew2 ай бұрын
Did he end this clip with saying that boeing is the world leading manufacturer for airplanes? I think that is history.
@FLIGAVIA2 ай бұрын
it was
@ElsaMinren2 ай бұрын
The environmental impact of older aircraft can't be ignored. KLM's choice to go with the more eco-friendly A321Neo is commendable.
@FLIGAVIA2 ай бұрын
Thanks for your comment
@HisayaSumita2 ай бұрын
KLM's decision to switch to the A321Neo highlights the ongoing issues with the 737. Airbus is definitely gaining ground!
@FLIGAVIA2 ай бұрын
✈✈
@subhansubhan49832 ай бұрын
Sad to see the B737 go, but it’s clear the A321Neo offers a lot of advantages. Can’t wait to see these planes in action.
@FLIGAVIA2 ай бұрын
thanks for your feedback
@GarrottWalifKalil2 ай бұрын
KLM’s decision shows the industry’s shift towards newer, more efficient aircraft.
@FLIGAVIA2 ай бұрын
✈✈
@another_pointless_account41302 ай бұрын
This is just text to AI speech isn't it. Sounds super unnatural.
@Drew-do9wx2 ай бұрын
KLM used to be pretty loyal to Boeing. I think they are no longer feeling that way.
@FLIGAVIA2 ай бұрын
yes
@adrianbriggs2763Ай бұрын
KLM were Douglas customers WAY before Boeing. I believe they had nearly every model that Douglas and then McDonnell Douglas made, When boeing took MD Over, they went with Boeing, however, have had had Airbus before
@Drew-do9wx14 күн бұрын
@@adrianbriggs2763 it doesn't change anything for me. I've always liked KLM and I'm sure I will continue to like them.
@otmarvasatko58882 ай бұрын
With the A320/a321 NEO, Airbus surpassed Boeing in the most attractive category of aircraft and ascended to the top of the aviation industry.
@FLIGAVIA2 ай бұрын
✈✈
@piotrd11892 ай бұрын
227 seats in A321? Come on Klm... You are not a low cost...
@ellenpdpc2 ай бұрын
The A321 Neo’s fuel efficiency and range are impressive. KLM is making a smart move for the future.
@FLIGAVIA2 ай бұрын
do you wanna fly on it?
@quachelliana2 ай бұрын
The analysis of the Boeing 737s issues was insightful. KLMs decision makes sense given the circumstances.
@FLIGAVIA2 ай бұрын
thanks
@YoshifumiKanada2 ай бұрын
The transition from the B737 to the A321Neo is a smart move by KLM. The A321Neo's fuel efficiency is a game-changer in reducing operating costs.
@FLIGAVIA2 ай бұрын
Thanks for your comment
@neilburns88692 ай бұрын
It's also fair to add that Boeing has been forced into slowing down it's operations by the FAA who unsurprisingly wants to keep a closer eye on how the American company goes about their business and so Boeing aren't able to fulfill their orders as quickly. The knock-on effect of this is that some airlines will look elsewhere. KLM has already bought several Embraer airliners and are currently replacing their 737s with a321neo as you have touched on. They have also ordered several a350 to replace their Dreamliners but delivery isn't until 2026 for these long-haul airliners.
@FLIGAVIA2 ай бұрын
thanks for comment
@ElladineTartha2 ай бұрын
The A321Neo’s performance and range are impressive.
@FLIGAVIA2 ай бұрын
thanks for comment
@MikiTsuji2 ай бұрын
The A321Neo's quieter engines and increased passenger capacity are major advantages for KLM. Passengers will definitely appreciate the improved experience.
@FLIGAVIA2 ай бұрын
that's right
@chris1978nl2 ай бұрын
@@FLIGAVIA Flew with TAP on 330 and 321, and i was surprised by this aircraft. (had to book extra legroom tho). Was quiet, could have a solid rest on a long haul flight. With KLM's friendly staff i possibly would choose for them. And sometimes you can have really good deals with KLM, even tho they are mostly a bit on the high price. But you get what you pay for... KLM is solid good.
@Dirk-van-den-Berg2 ай бұрын
The statement that KLM could be an all Boeing-company is factually incorrect. For shorthaul KLM has heavily invested in Embraers. So, KLM always kept their options open.
@FLIGAVIA2 ай бұрын
thanks for your comment✈️✈️✈️
@jamesbartlett56402 ай бұрын
That’s KLM Cityhopper which for years always flew Fokker aircraft.
@Dirk-van-den-Berg2 ай бұрын
@@jamesbartlett5640 Still KLM, no matter how you spin it.
@NaomiClareNL2 ай бұрын
Had a friend who lived in the Amsterdam neighbourhood of Buitenveldert, some 600 meters from the descending planes using the socalled Buitenveldertbaan, runway 09/27. godawful noise even at 600 meters distance and especially so in the early morning. Noise reduction for Schipho; is a major thing for the people of the region even if it is not so much a commercial driver like using less fuel or flying farther with the same amount or transport more for the same amount of fuel.
@RealMash2 ай бұрын
And without the annoying "BOOM" from time to time...
@Nederland1802 ай бұрын
Yes I also live in the Netherlands and everytime I fly from Schiphol i hear the Boeingplanes make so fucking much noise yeah can hear the everywhere in the airport sometimes also silently in the bathrooms
@Nederland1802 ай бұрын
@@RealMashexactly
@ScoobyMoony2 ай бұрын
Why does the Transavia new a321neo have winglets but klm don't i mean winglets causes the aircraft to have less turbulence right?
@DolleHengst2 ай бұрын
Best engine bolted to the finest aircraft in its segment. Easy choice
@FLIGAVIA2 ай бұрын
All is perfect ✈️✈️
@PushpaNageshAmleshAmlesh2 ай бұрын
The A321Neo’s reduced noise and increased range are great benefits. KLM passengers will appreciate these upgrades.
@FLIGAVIA2 ай бұрын
thanks for your comment
@spartannl82272 ай бұрын
And let’s also not forget the aspect that Schiphol is requiring reduced noise levels from airlines to resolve or at least accommodate long lasting complaints about too high noise levels from people living in the vicinity of Schiphol Airport. As due to the expansions over the years -both of Schiphol and of the built up / housing areas surrounding the airport- noise pollution had become and still remains to be an also politically sensitive issue.
@KinokaTakeda2 ай бұрын
KLM’s focus on fuel efficiency with the A321neo aligns with current industry trends towards sustainability. This move could set an example for other airlines.
@AlbertZonneveld2 ай бұрын
The LR version has better leg room with is awsome. Some of my best flying experiences
@EleanoHealey2 ай бұрын
It's interesting to see KLM move away from the 737. The A321Neo must have some serious advantages!
@FLIGAVIA2 ай бұрын
Thanks for your comment.
@Nederland1802 ай бұрын
I’m not suprised if they switch from the 787 family to the A350-900
@markuseden21052 ай бұрын
They already have kzbin.info/www/bejne/aWfXgYSEaJ2Ibac
@KamilP-cm9vk2 ай бұрын
Airbus 320 Neo And Airbus 321 NEO are more quite I heard.😊
@FLIGAVIA2 ай бұрын
thanks for your feedback
@standrewpics2 ай бұрын
Sign of the times , Boeing current issues started many years ago , I just watched a TV aircraft investigation involving Boeing complacency many years ago . Boeing could fold as an aircraft manufacturer I believe. They have themselves to blame . Boeing using an updated aircraft based on the old 737 , they can not complete with airbus , providing new and better aircraft . If it a Boeing I am not going , if I flying Boeing I may end up going ! Reputation is vital for survival in the airline industry.
@FLIGAVIA2 ай бұрын
thanks for sharing
@d88892 ай бұрын
Well done KLM! One more reason to keep on flying with the dutch carrier. If even the 787 were phased out it would be even better!
@FLIGAVIA2 ай бұрын
thanks for comment
@OfficialDoggyYT2 ай бұрын
average Airbus fanboy
@d88892 ай бұрын
@@OfficialDoggyYT You? As a former Boeing pilot I wouldn't trust my former beloved brand anymore
@barrettlucinda752 ай бұрын
It’s interesting to see how the instability of the B737 Max influenced KLM’s fleet change.
@FLIGAVIA2 ай бұрын
many thanks for your comment
@Marcel206582 ай бұрын
It is an Air France decision! KLM has no influence in this decision. AirFrance/KLM the most expensive price for an outdated interior and service! Bye-bye KLM...never fly again with the most arrogant personal they have!
@RealMash2 ай бұрын
@@Marcel20658 And that impacts the choice of plane...how?
@Marcel206582 ай бұрын
@@RealMash Meaning? I was talking about KLM/Airfrance overall!
@JanJaapBats2 ай бұрын
Since june 2022 Pieter Elbers is no longer CEO of KLM
@FLIGAVIA2 ай бұрын
thanks for your comment
@JoseLlacksear2 ай бұрын
The A321Neo offers better range and capacity, making it an ideal choice for KLM's European routes. This will undoubtedly enhance their service.
@FLIGAVIA2 ай бұрын
That's right
@bastiaanstapelberg90182 ай бұрын
Verstandige beslissing. Geef aan een Boeing nog niet mijn oude schoenen mee.
@FLIGAVIA2 ай бұрын
Thanks for you comment
@stephendoherty82912 ай бұрын
Plus the engines can't run in synthetic aviation fuel SAF. It's main Dutch hub wants to cut flights but not passengers, so "bigger" planes need to be ordered now for definite delivery while cutting costs so that a bigger seat capacity plane can run with less passengers at the same profit margin. It may also be an indication that Airbus pilots are "easier" to recruit. Mostly is frustrated Boeing has as this will add to KLMs cost in having two fleet types even if the 787 would be less efficient on paper
@FLIGAVIA2 ай бұрын
You have shared good information, thanks
@willemvanroozendaal22252 ай бұрын
I am surprised that you do not mention the fact that the Airbus A321 neo is delivered to KLM in a containerized version. B737max does not have this option. For loading/unloading this makes a big difference for the ground staff performing this tasks. In view of Dutch or EU legislation this is not to be underestimated.
@FLIGAVIA2 ай бұрын
nice, thanks for sharing
@alradioguy22692 ай бұрын
Boeing is a classic example of what happens to a company when the bean counters assume the power, in this case, instead of design and engineering calling the shots. Hunger for short term gain overlooks the potential for long term pain. The MAX is not the only problem in the Boeing camp. The 787 line in Alabama is also suffering quality issues. I wouldn't be surprised if KL eventually replaces their 78-9 fleet with A350s.
@FLIGAVIA2 ай бұрын
thanks for your comment ✈️
@AndrewLarson-mq7xc2 ай бұрын
Boeing will get there crap back together it didn't happen overnight won't be fixed overnight
@alradioguy22692 ай бұрын
@@AndrewLarson-mq7xc The only way that will happen is if their corporate culture undergoes a massive change and wrests power from the accountants. How many "overnights" do you believe that will take?
@AndrewLarson-mq7xc2 ай бұрын
@@alradioguy2269 got to have accountants can't get buy without them if people want a paycheck every 2 weeks.
@alradioguy22692 ай бұрын
@@AndrewLarson-mq7xc It shouldn't have happened in the first place. How many more will be subjected to peril until they get THEIR crap back?
@jefs29282 ай бұрын
Boeing has neglected to design a new aircraft and has always added new parts to the 737, which originally dates from 1967, until they were left with an outdated aircraft to which no more parts could be added. All this to please the shareholder, because developing a new aircraft costs a lot of money, and now, they have been sideways passed by Airbus, who are bringing a new aircraft. So the shareholders are shooting in their own foot.
@FLIGAVIA2 ай бұрын
true
@MarcyJuadore2 ай бұрын
Boeing needs to step up if they want to retain big clients like KLM.
@FLIGAVIA2 ай бұрын
thanks for your comment
@odb3882 ай бұрын
Airbus 321 NEO is far efficient than the Boeing competition
@FLIGAVIA2 ай бұрын
✈✈
@PereiraEatherton2 ай бұрын
KLM's decision to unify its fleet with the A321Neo aligns with the Air France-KLM Group's strategy to streamline operations. This move will likely bring significant cost savings.
@Nand-xj2nq2 ай бұрын
The A321Neo’s range and capacity are impressive. KLM is making a forward-thinking decision here.
@FLIGAVIA2 ай бұрын
thanks
@mrdog41552 ай бұрын
Out of context hut finally someone that gives credits to the clips in the video
@FLIGAVIA2 ай бұрын
thanks for your feedback, we always do that
@mrdog41552 ай бұрын
@@FLIGAVIA nice vid btw
@UltimateSeduction2 ай бұрын
Good call.... Boeings are crap these days
@FLIGAVIA2 ай бұрын
Thanks for sharing your thoughts
@pjotrhof25052 ай бұрын
Wise decision, Airbus currently makes/supplies a better and more reliable aircraft with better performance on noise/kerosene use and a more spacious seat layout.💪🏼
@FLIGAVIA2 ай бұрын
🛫🛫
@gianfrancoluishoyos17126 күн бұрын
God bless Airbus
@jeroenafca165Ай бұрын
they made the right choice, Boeing is making to many mistakes lately, they promise but cant deliver
@JMVD482 ай бұрын
I hope that Boeing will one day make a new modern and safe aircraft to replace the old-fashioned 737. We all love Boeing airplanes.
@Nederland1802 ай бұрын
Yeah that would be great
@jamillikan2 ай бұрын
No, no, not everyone loves Boeing.
@MrVisАй бұрын
Maybe I am stupid, but Pieter Elbers wasn't CEO when this decision was made? I believe Elbers left KLM mid 2022...
@SK-gs5mcАй бұрын
Decision was made in December 2021. Elbers was still CEO.
@NeilClemenson2 ай бұрын
With the delays to the Max 10’s certification makes sense. Also, let’s be fair the Max is a bit of a disaster! Better be safe this time and stick to Airbus until Boeing can get it’s house in order.
@FLIGAVIA2 ай бұрын
✈️✈️✈️
@OfficialDoggyYT2 ай бұрын
calling the Max a disaster in 2024 is pretty wild, also what happened to that A350 again which was supposed to be "uncrashable" stated by Airbus? seems Boeing isnt the only company to lie
@NeilClemenson2 ай бұрын
Sorry, but it is a disaster, if anyone can’t see that they are deluded. Boeing are killing people with a poor company culture and shabby manufacturing practices. I am no Airbus fanboy. At the end of the day Boeing used to make great products. They have lost their way. Airbus have made their mistakes that’s true, but nothing on Boeing’s scale. The max has proven to be dangerous several times. It’s a flying coffin.
@ReneKnuvers74rk2 ай бұрын
[9:49] 'The worlds leading aircraft manufacturer'. This would be Boeing, right? Is this still the case? What is 'leading'? The company that sets the pace for the market? That would likely be Airbus with them bringing to market the most new or improved types in the last decade. Or does leading refer to the technological advancement? In that case Boeing is also behind, with Airbus using more efficient designs and high cockpit similarity between wildly diverse types. I guess the American dream of Boeing being a leader in a relative commodity market of passenger aircraft has come down like a lead zeppelin in the last decade. They seem unable to bring new designs to market, cut corners on production and engineering quality. That is not the attitude an industry leader is required to have.