Bought a TYM 2400 a couple months ago, partly because of the simple, reliable engine design and manual transmission.
@Tonnsfabrication9 ай бұрын
Kukje was partnered with Cummins for some years back in the 2000's and built the A series Cummins I believe. If you look at an A series cummins and a 55 hp Kukje they definitely have similarities. I've got a 574 TYM with 55hp Kukje and the engine was the main reason I chose it over many other brands and or models with common rail/ECM.
@oldfarmer47008 ай бұрын
It’s a Cummins design and I believe they hold the patent on it. Far as I can tell it’s the same. The A series motor is a medium duty and put in generators, pumps, air compressors and other things that were smaller needs. It’s a good motor and you can buy parts directly form a cummins supplier.
@Nevz86GT10 ай бұрын
Thanks for putting this information together, interesting stuff.
@addictedtobedrock52828 ай бұрын
And these are all the reasons, plus more, is why I bought a TYM T474 last year.
@Mountaintoptractor7 ай бұрын
Great video! As a tym 574 owner/operator I found this super helpful.
@TheTractorYard8 ай бұрын
Great video, Admir! TYM does not promote their core values enough… They have the most simple, cost effective, feature rich (by standard) tractors on the market. I often tell my customers that these tractors are more “old school” than the “old school” brands are these days….
@tomcullom1218Ай бұрын
Good info. I agree with everything except on the liners. A solid block can be prone to pinholes from cavation, unless you add a coolant treatment. I have had several blocks board and sleeved when this has happened.
@TonysTractorAdventure11 ай бұрын
Very informative video
@sawmilldan7 ай бұрын
I have a 574 that has a mil icon and no rpms ( even thou i can run it up and down. Both local shops could not tell me where the rpms are sensed so i can check wiring. You did in about the first 30 seconds. Thank you
@kentonequipment46872 ай бұрын
I love the simplicity. What sucks about this is, like the DOC stuff, if this barely scrapes by current emissions regulations (or at least it seems like). If the EPA moves the goal post even a step TYM/Kukje won't have an answer for a 35-60HP engine in the U.S. What are your thoughts on this?
@HamRadioAlaska7 ай бұрын
Simplicity is the best solution. My Branson (TYM) just works...no conputer.
@timsimon659510 ай бұрын
Hi,Good video, like to see more.
@iSot80Ай бұрын
Thank you for this video. A lot of new information what I did not know. I have one question about new TYM tractor models. Do you perhaps know what engine is used for these newer TYM tractors for example TYM F50RN Compact, Series 2 48 hp tractor? Is it still reliable Kukje diesel engine or something else which are new line of engines what TYM has created? Thanks.
@MrJwh300010 ай бұрын
The Simpson engine in the Massey Ferguson is old school and reliable just like the Perkins it replaced. Wonder if the fuel system is as reliable as you say the tym one is.
@gravelytodd7 ай бұрын
The Simpson diesel is high pressure common rail and uses the EGR system. The 2600h series is made in India by the TAFE company.
@johnhenry832510 ай бұрын
Enjoyed the video ,, thanks
@bradleyhughes68537 ай бұрын
Why do you think liners leaking is a common thing? I found this interesting because, I have very little experience with tractors newer than the 1960's, and I am considering buying a new compact with a loader. One thought that didn't make sense to me was when you stated talking about sleeves being a problem, maybe new gaskets are junk, blocks are not held in the same tolerances(which should be better with todays technology), heck maybe we just got lucky, but I have worked on and used 5 tractors ranging from 35 to 94 hp and none of them had sleeve issues with regards to leaking coolant into the crankcase. All of them have gone past 10,000 hours by now and their motors we have torn into during my life had bearing wear or broke a spring and dropped a valve or excessive blowby or blown head gasket.
@ellobo13268 ай бұрын
Had to replace an egr valve in my LS tractor with only 400 hours on it. Luckily, I had a couple months of emissions system warranty. I like the tractor but know the emissions bull crap makes it a ticking time bomb.
@bennsellingit310011 ай бұрын
Good morning.. thank you for the video.. one question... is the 5835 R also mechanical or is it a ECM based system? Thank you for your response
@UTSEquipmentCompany11 ай бұрын
Thanks for watching! The 5835R is indeed mechanically fuel injected.
@bennsellingit310011 ай бұрын
Good deal.. once again good job on the video.. nobody else has gone over these kukje engines the way you have
@mariannehiltunen95310 ай бұрын
Great info the layman can understand 👍
@Redhackle2 ай бұрын
Great video. Thank you
@twc90007 ай бұрын
I used to have an old 1970s Volkswagon Squareback that had mechanical fuel injection. It was very unreliable and constantly needed maintenance. I'm a little skeptical of mechanical fuel injection because of that, but you make a good arguement.
@brianhoxworth38817 ай бұрын
I've had a few 60-70 vw, and worked on them every time I wanted to go somewhere.
@carsonswinemar5454 ай бұрын
Great information!!! Thanks for that!
@richardbritton52809 ай бұрын
Interesting ty 👍🏆🏆👴🐕🚜😎🙏🙏💙
@AnomadAlaska9 ай бұрын
👍
@EricDodgeMusicAndDance4 ай бұрын
The 2515h has this simple system doesn’t it? I wondered if the H transmission changed the simplicity
@ozjado9 ай бұрын
I dunno man if I had a Million years to worm on it I'd get it running without the ecm 😂
@mongowildman5 ай бұрын
I have a new TYM. T25. It has a Yanmar engine. So why did they switch?
@chadcoxthehunterchadcox82525 ай бұрын
The larger TYM have the Kukje engine
@BombsAwayLP2 ай бұрын
Just bought a bad boy 4025, dealer made it a better deal than the 2515 so thats what i got
@williampierce5615Ай бұрын
Bs emissions my boy.
@larryames88319 ай бұрын
10 to 19 per ent b e t ter full econòmy. Ichoose the T4⁷4.
@wizard_of_poz44138 ай бұрын
Wut
@larryames88317 ай бұрын
OK
@larryames88317 ай бұрын
My mistakes. IMO, choose a diesel tractor by the weight and horsepower you will need to drag, push, or supply enought pto horsepower for work as you know it. A problem, inovations in tra tractors always require more hp. Presently the common-rail will provide you the best efficentcy. But it requires a cumputer to manage the inputs (senors). The 50yo mechanical injection pump, though less efficent, will have greatly less liability for failures. Longer warrenties are put in place to sell tractors with newer tehnologies. I brought a T474, no DEF, 48HP, 38@pto, with cab/air, mechanical fuel injection. I'd bet I lose 10% fuel economy to a closed loop system (