Last milestone to fully autonomous driving. How?

[@kumbackquatsta]

xpeng: this video elon: trust me bro

[@jonlykc2435]

G9的后视镜在调节到极限时会发出“咯、咯”声响（车辆本身没有问题），但用户体验不好。这种车价位 要请小鹏尽快改，用户的体验是比什么都重要的！

[@Asian_Connection]

Xpeng need professional help on promoting their car. U should help them out.

[@kyrvaholera4761]

In my opinion xpeng g9 would be perfect but very small battery for this machine atleast 120kw better 150kw or more! and add more colors, the car is perfect in design, yes, but I like the rear optics of the li9 more, it will be cool if Xpeng g9 makes even better rear optics in the restyling it will be more beautiful than the LI9, so overall the car is very good

[@tommyjakobsen5504]

G9 is a UNNEEDED big tank, the point of use a EV is economy and that demand to be aerodynamic and lightweight, G9 is the oppisit of that and much better they build a schoolbus for childern instate of the Heavy G9. Sedans and small hatchback are for familie use.. The smaller P5 is much more related to Familie use, Even better if the P5 was a hatchback with tow Hook option, also Xpeng they need to consider V2H bi-charcing for future infrastructure..

[@kyrvaholera4761]

@@tommyjakobsen5504 G9 and G6 are different classes of cars, I respect your opinion, but I don't agree with your position about g9, since the G9 crossover is possible in countries like China or in Europe, they are not so popular, but in Ukraine, etc. countries with harsh winters, crossovers are quite popular, so I am considering the desired G9 with a 150 kW battery, time goes by, technology develops and eventually they will be light, but with a larger battery capacity, then they will not be so heavy and economical as a crossover, and in the G6, the interior of the car is very simple, and the appearance is not bad, but it does not chip like other popular sedans, hatchbacks, it is interesting how this car will show itself in practice

[@EJFJ-Corporation]

No, the Xpeng G9 is very powerful and very very effective, it can drive 700km with a single charge, always more than 500km in any condition of temperature or chargind devices used in the car... It is not a Tesla, with low consumption but uneffective battery charging technology...

[@cresmarc820]

BIG OOF

[@curioussand1339]

Just be honest, we all know that a former Tesla employee, Cao Guangzhi, copied and stole Tesla's FSD source code and handed it over to XPeng. Common parasitic Chinese practices.

[@enigmatum]

Maybe. But third party examined the codes and found no commonality. The dispute was dropped. Even if XPeng saw FSD code, it was no help, because XNGP uses more sensors by then. It's like seeing a Calculus homework, when you are working on multi-variate calculus. Would have been helpful two semesters ago, but not then.

[@黄张赵刘]

Yeah tesla lost that dispute after Xpeng showed their sistem was totally original lol

[@enigmatum]

@@黄张赵刘 ya I want to be fair to say China used to steal a lot. So it’s fair Tesla made the accusation. Except XPeng is ahead of Tesla last 3-4 years. Ridiculous to steal from the lesser.

[@NyashaM]

They should have open sourced that software. Look at all the progress we could have had if only it was open source

[@curioussand1339]

@@NyashaM Problem with open source is that the companies that invest billions in new technology will not be able to leverage that investment to be able to pay their developers and grow the company. I doubt we would see the same level of entrepreneurship and dedication if you could not harvest your own crop. Most people would then likely prefer to harvest other peoples crops.

[@BobbyDraws.me2]

Copied Tesla FSD code. Hacked.

[@JJZhou-n6m]

The xngp performance is superior to FSD with the assistance of Lidar. Why do you copy something worse than u？