LATAM 800 Auckland to Santiago - 10 hours 50 Minutes - Direct - Game over for Flat Earth.

LA800 Flight history.
www.flightrada...

[@beardydave926]

The perfect rebuttal: "But ,you didn't show the entire flite in one cut from start to end ,there four it isn't reel." Keep it coming Wolfie! Great work.

[@profphilbell2075]

Love the spelling 🤣

[@csjrogerson2377]

@@profphilbell2075 There is a new setting in MS spell-checker called English (Flerf)

[@geepea101able]

there four, flite, reel! You definately missed a LOT of school days!

[@Sherwoody]

@@geepea101able a hem. thats scool daze.

[@montithered4741]

Gotta lie to flerf. Thanks Bob

[@MissionControl-dk]

I'm surprised Emma didn't catch a flat earther. They seem to take the bait really well.

[@Sherwoody]

You need a different bait for flatfish. They’re bottom feeders.

[@Lucas_Tulic]

Top comment!!!

[@HOOOLD_ON]

They may bite, but they are very slippery. There's no chance you'd get them to admit they are on dry land.

[@bluemarblescience]

I wish the game was over Wolfie. Emma's fish knows it made a mistake. Unfortunately, flerfs are too stupid or hard headed to admit it.

[@nemysisretrogaming3771]

It's never game over for flatties. They keep shifting the goal post, or "flat out" ignoring factual evidence. Pun intended lol.

[@montithered4741]

Because they can always lie and claim others are lying.

[@voxelvoid]

Dude, sunset alone is the game over for flat earth

[@lappansommer546]

No, silly! That's due to flerspective! Which is just like perspective performed by a computer renderer that has an arbitrary cut off distance so you see a hard horizon line that occludes the solar disc but it's really just fading out due to distance!

[@Sherwoody]

Did they ever consider the path the sun would take across the sky on a flat earth?

[@mikep9604]

@@Sherwoody They don't understand it because they lack the knowledge of even the most basic geometry. They can't understand that the path of the sun would be different on a flat earth compared to what we see on a rotating globe. They just ignore this thing.

[@pizdamatii5001]

that's exactly what a nikon salesperson would say :p

[@fepeerreview3150]

I tracked one of these flights on flightradar some months back, in both directions. They fly regularly.

[@harmlesscreationsofthegree1248]

Flerfs always forget the southern hemisphere. Sure, we only have 10% of the world’s population, but we’re at least 70% of their dumb ‘map’. And they have no answer for why the Southern Cross constellation is visible in South Africa, South America, New Zealand and Australia simultaneously, yet nowhere else on this flat earth of theirs.

[@lappansommer546]

We have only 10% of the population because the Global Deceit budget can't afford more crisis actors :-) (especially since the budget had to include equipping Air New Zealand with the Concordes-disguised-as-A320 that whisk us between Auckland and Sydney in just 3 hours, despite it being the same distance on the Gleeson flat map as Paris - New York)

[@Sherwoody]

…and then there’s Mitchell…and Failzoid.

[@vimalramachandran]

On FE, this flight will not only be of a much longer duration, but will also take a different path than it actually does. This is one of many long distance flights in the Southern Hemisphere that totally destroy FE.

[@ReValveiT_01]

There isn't a single flat earther on the planet that would dare take that flight. Just shows that 'truth' is something they never seek.

[@HOOOLD_ON]

There has been several invitations with all costs included. Still no takers.

[@cambridgemart2075]

@@HOOOLD_ON GS definitely offered them a seat for free but the offer wasn't taken up

[@fromnorway643]

*Model Distance Speed* Flat earth: 23,437 km 2163 km/h Real Earth: 9653 km 891 km/h Flat earther: "Those engineers are very good, having disguised that Dreamliner's afterburning turbojets as high-bypass turbofans!"

[@kitcanyon658]

: I once had a flatter tell me that the jet stream is really fast and that's why plane could make the trip. When I pointed out then how it is possible to fly eastward, into this "fast" jet stream and cover the same distance in just 1-2 hour longer.

[@ALLnamesTAKENffs]

The windows are probably holograms, and you only think you're seeing nonstop ocean views. Flerfers know the truth tho. Globers need to remove the windows mid flight to prove the planes not really flying over land

[@Sableagle]

@@kitcanyon658 Eastbound jet streams at 31000 feet, 33000 feet and 35000 feet, westbound jet streams at 32000 feet, 34000 feet and 36000 feet, and no turbluence in between them for *_r e a s o n s._*

[@matth3wc]

Not only that, but they'd break the sound barrier too and you'd definitely know it. I bring that point up when they say, "well of course it can cover it in 10 hours still. They just fly faster"

[@HOOOLD_ON]

Sorry for the late in, but how did you gather the numbers for the flat earth model? Was it any more scientific than putting your finger in the air to feel the winds?

[@rindordrums]

Love your content, Wolfie! Educating flerfs! Keep it coming!

[@kenchristie9214]

Educating a flerf is like teaching a pig to sing. It annoys the hell out of the pig and it's bloody hard on the ears.

[@rindordrums]

@@kenchristie9214 Bahahahahaha!!!😂🤣👍

[@Katy_Jones]

You have to wonder why they don't use those supersonic widebodies on other routes.

[@benroberts2222]

because it would expose the conspiracy of course. "They" can ONLY use them on these handful of southern routes to keep us globeheads in the dark 😉

[@baskerwilliam4492]

I am at a total loss to understand why flat earthers believe what they believe. Must be a total lack of critical thinking on their part. Many years ago I undertook a polar navigation exercise around the geographic South Pole. It necessitated grid navigation techniques as it was before VLF, inertial and GPS. We had to use a directional gyro which had to be corrected every 15 minutes due to gyroscopic precession. Magnetic compass useless because of magnetic dip being too close to the south magnetic pole. (Retired ATPL from 3 countries with 14,000 hours in log book.)

[@whereswa11y]

"Let's have a look" ... love it

[@profphilbell2075]

Spot on! If only a flerf would actually take one of these flights, because truth matters to them. I’m kidding 🤣

[@-Fritz-]

Well obviously they move the entire continent a little closer every time there's a plane on the way.

[@JohnMichaelson]

Ahh the ends of your vids are always such nice palate cleansers after coping with the flat earth nonsense beforehand 😄. Those are some of the daintiest llamas I've ever seen. We had a couple that would snatch more than they could chew all at once.

[@Wolfie6020]

The have such a gentle nature. Emma hand feeds them each time we go to NZ.

[@stephenlitten1789]

@@Wolfie6020 I thought it was NZ - light, flora, and so on screamed "not West Island!"

[@CatsMeowPaw]

Flat Earthers: "But but... all those people in the plane are actors! And the plane takes off and lands after five minutes and everyone gets off around the corner of the building!" 😂🤣🤣🤣

[@ballsouttruth1169]

I didn't see any actors or anybody else in that scummy little airport. Looks like Australia has fallen with the help of the satanic minions help.. Look forward to your lockdowns your dumb creatures. 2:10

[@nounoufriend1442]

Careful what you say , they will be using your comment to debunk this flight 😂

[@pharynx007]

this comment isn't related to the video, other than the fact that it is something else flerfs can't explain: at least, specifically the flerfs that believe in the firmament. they always say in reality, you can't have gas pressure next to a vacuum, that the atmosphere should rush out and fill space. but, if there is a firmament, then the gases should've spread out evenly within the dome. why is there a gradient of gas pressures? if we're really living in a snow globe, the gas pressure would even out. relative density and buoyancy wouldn't give a gradient. they need to explain the gradient. this is one of the biggest evidences against a firmament at least, but also the flat earth fantasy imo. that and the ring laser gyro they bought that showed a 15º per hour drift. i don't think i've seen the flerfs even attempt to give a coherent explanation for the gradient, and i feel that needs to be hammered into them.

[@ainhat.]

But buoyancy would give a gradient since it is not just one gas different gases with different weights and don't forget temperature and weather also plays a role. I am not a flat earther but I cant wrap my head around the atmosphere existing in the midst of vacuum without a physical enclosure.

[@ceejay0137]

A good way to debunk the jet stream idea would be two simultaneous flights on that same route between Santiago and Auckland in opposite directions. If the one going with the jet stream takes only 10 hours , the other could take days!

[@Starhawke_Gaming]

​@@ainhat.- gravity is the container

[@daveg5729]

​@ainhat. Think of it this way. Mass attracts mass. If there were no atmosphere and you got on top of a cliff and dropped a molecule of nitrogen, or helium, or oxygen etc., it would fall towards the surface at 9.8m/s^2 because gravity exists and the molecule has mass. It wouldn't get sucked off into space. But instead of 1 molecule, there are a bazillion of them, and they're all bound to earth because mass attracts mass. Maybe this thought experiment will help.

[@ceejay0137]

@@david_akerman Sorry, you're wrong about what causes buoyancy. If you imagine a parcel of air of any shape, it's surrounded by the rest of the air. That surrounding air exerts a net upward force on the parcel which stops it falling under gravity. If you replace the original parcel of air with an object of the same shape, it will also experience the same upward force due to the surrounding air, which is equal to the weight of the original air parcel. This is Archimedes' Principle: an object immersed in any fluid medium experiences a loss in weight equal to the weight of the fluid it displaces. If the object is lighter than the same volume of air (e.g. a balloon filled with helium) the upward force exceeds the downward pull of gravity and the object rises.

[@tornagawn]

We hosted an International student from Chile a few years back who took this exact flight! #gottalietoflerf

[@fedogma8407]

I think it might have been Jeran from Globebusters who claimed this was possible since all the jet had to do was use a Jetstream to increase the ground speed but he never did say how the return flight fought those headwinds to make it back to Auckland. Of course, the Auckland - Santiago flight time is about the same as flights I take across the Pacific from Seattle to Asia and yes, the fight from Asia to Seattle is faster but only by a few hours.

[@grahvis]

That particular claim is better than his earlier one, which was the aircraft were supersonic with the instruments giving false readings, so the pilots wouldn't realise.

[@stevelloyd5785]

@@grahvis I wouldn't want a pilot who could be deceived like that, flying me to anywhere.

[@Sableagle]

What I want to know is how the aircraft get between supersonic eastbound jet stream winds at FL 250, 270, 290, 310 and 330 and supersonic westbound jet stream winds at FL 260, 280, 300, 320 and 340 without being torn apart by the turbulence.

[@fepeerreview3150]

Some months back I tracked one of these flights in BOTH directions on flightradar. I don't remember the details but the durations were within an hour of each other.

[@fedogma8407]

@@fepeerreview3150 I do know the air traffic control keeps track of the jet stream and tries to have flights to the west take advantage of them and flights to the east avoid them as much as possible. The last time we flew from Seattle to Asia we should have had a 2 hour stop-over in Seoul but the headwinds were so strong that it delayed our flight by 2 hours. After landing we were heading to the terminal and I noticed it was 6:50 pm which was the time our next flight was boarding. Fortunately, we did make our next flight on last call after a mad dash through the terminal. I was worried that our luggage might not have been so lucky but after we went through Thai customs our luggage was one of the first to pop up on the baggage carousel.

[@acerimmeh]

Flat earthers were seen shifting the goal posts shortly after this video was uploaded.

[@Sherwoody]

@@david_akerman he was measuring with a surveyors wheel and took a wrong turn at Coober Pedy.

[@andrewdavison3293]

Done that flight. Works as advertised.

[@JustWasted3HoursHere]

And if you show this flight on a flat Earth map it will be far longer and in fact be more miles than any airplane in existence can fly in one go.

[@frogsinpants]

It turns out that direct flights are perfectly possible in the southern hemiplate because something something Rayleigh criterion.

[@fromnorway643]

You mean density perspective?

[@frogsinpants]

@@fromnorway643 Hmm, interesting. That's not what I meant, but now that you mention it, the density perspective would make the flight time shorter if NASA inverts the angle of attack of the CGI.

[@awatt]

I had a Rayleigh Criterion once but the wheels fell off.

[@Sherwoody]

There’s also the Riley Criterion, but it only works with eggs.

[@MichaelOnines]

Needs more lab coat.@@Sherwoody

[@nineoclockhero]

dammit! That fish was bigger than anything I ever managed to catch 😢😁

[@Requiem4aDr3Am]

hook, line, and sinker. good job emma

[@SpottedSharks]

Shouldn't those planes at the gate be upside down????? GOTCHA!

[@Sableagle]

How do you know the camera wasn't?

[@Trevor_Austin]

As I type (08:17 UTC) this flight is still enroute to SCL. How many flatties will dispute the existence of this flight? Some really strange flat Earth incantations and whacko maths would have to uttered to deny its existence. The websites of Auckland and Santiago (SCL) would have to be in on any deception as would FlightRadar24. Now if we assume that this flight will average say 500 mph, I wonder how far apart these two places would be? I also noticed flights from Sydney and Melbourne are also scheduled. I wonder what their flight times would also tell us about their distance from SCL? Now let’s consider what the initial depart track would be for the last two flights. Would it be northwest, west or southwest? I wonder if a flattie could answer? To do that they need a map. But just like a shy bride on her wedding night, they are a bit coy about flashing the goods.

[@sineout9294]

And as I write this there's a Sydney to Santiago and a Santiago to Auckland visible as well. Not to mention the RNZAF Hercules on its way to Chch from Antarctica. It's a traffic jam out there.

[@mikep9604]

Some time ago I explained to a flat earther that the flight path of the direct flight from Sydney to Santiago doesn't correspond to reality on a Gleason's map. I explained the difference between the actual flight path and the one on Gleason's map. The reply was that "Gleason's map shows the real flight path." They completely ignore the fact that people who take this flight will see that the flight path is not what flat earthers think it would be.

[@AkatarawaJapan]

Now you’re being a llamaist.

[@thedave7760]

This comment wins the comment section today.

[@awatt]

🏆

[@mballer]

The flight is always cancelled on Flat Earth. (and it uses the jet stream for super sonic speeds) EDIT: I forgot about the twin pilots, twin planes and twin passengers, NASA has a big budget.

[@archerbrown8733]

Real

[@RockinRobbins13]

The game was already over in the year 1000 when celestial navigation as we know it began to be used. Celestial navigation requires a spherical Earth of 7,900 mile diameter or it won't work.

[@Oddball5.0]

I think 1000 is a little early?

[@Sableagle]

@@Oddball5.0 It's probably very late. The Koreans and Romans may have known about it 2100 years ago. Someone else can explain to the flerfs why we don't see "87 B.C." stamped on any coins from back then.

[@RockinRobbins13]

@@Oddball5.0 Navigators on the Mediterranean Sea.... oops! You're right! *"The art of celestial navigation is 4,000 years old""* _"The first Western civilisation known to have developed oceanic navigational techniques were the Phoenicians in around 2000 BC. They used primitive charts and observed the sun and stars to determine directions, and by the end of the millennium had a more precise handle on constellations, eclipses and moon movements which allowed for more safe and direct travel across the Mediterranean during both the day and night."_ Sorry about the misconception there. I was way short at 1000 AD. It was more like 2000 BC. I apologize for the error.

[@Oddball5.0]

@@RockinRobbins13 I don't know where that quote came from but it's a terrible source. The Phoenicians weren't a western civilization, for one thing. Navigation by the stars is older than we'll ever know. There are references to it in the Odyssey (written down in the 8th century B.C.) for example. However, I was asking about your statement "celestial navigation as we know it." That seemed to me to imply navigation using actual instruments, and I think A.D. 1000 is a little early for that. But correct me if I'm wrong.

[@RockinRobbins13]

@@Oddball5.0 _"Phoenicians weren't a western civilization,"_ So a people who lived on the eastern shore of the Mediterranean Sea and who were contemporaneous with the Egyptians and Greeks weren't western civilization. They were the GLUE of western civilization, the Star Trek Ferengi of the ancient world! They traded with every civilization of the Mediterranean and weren't part of the western world? Yikes. Tinfoil everywhere. You are right in the sense that the Phoenicians were so concentrated on business that they didn't leave much record of other aspects. But their lineage did extend to the city of Carthage and other cities defeated by the Romans in relatively recent history. Very little of their cultural influence is present today and that is one of the aspects that contribute to the Phoenicians being perhaps the most fascinating civilization ever.

[@Keepontruckin1904]

Now they’ll complain they didn’t see the flight live. Goal posts will definitely be moved or maybe they will just claim CGI

[@detectiveinspekta]

Ah the Air NZ counter, where you pickup your food vouchers when the plane is late.

[@stevelloyd5785]

I can't believe it. Half pissed, 22:00, and I can recognise AKL just looking at the thumbnail because of the view out the window. But I do live there (Auckland, not the airport). I must be due for another holiday.

[@dankieran5936]

Why should FEr's even be allowed the priveledge to get on plane if they deny how all the logistics of it works and the dedication of people involved from gps to mapping distances of the entire Earth to the pilots so they can have a safe flight, just seems so hypocritical.

[@grahvis]

My guess is, flat earthers will simply ignore it, like they do with all the other simple ways their silly flat earth is shown as the nonsense it is. More important is whether or not, Emma will catch the fishing bug.

[@hadz8671]

Always good to see the Wolf-cub at the end.

[@reidflemingworldstoughestm1394]

1:15 One thing we can deduce from this video is that, because the sky is above the ground, it is certain that you are in the northern hemisphere. Unless you had the camera upside down. Science is tricky that way.

[@stephenlitten1789]

Don't be silly. With all the heavy stuff up north, you fellas are upside down

[@baskerwilliam4492]

Great job Wolfie, once again showing the way. I often ask flat earthers how they account for the Northern Lights and the Southern Aurora considering there has to be two magnetic poles in order for these to be. Never a response worth considering.

[@Synaptic_gap]

If only flerf responded to fact, logic and reason. Welcome to the post truth world.

[@kenchristie9214]

Flerfers have a long distance relationship with fact, logic and reason.

[@appresley4071]

Imagine taking this flight with a flat earth pilot?

[@nounoufriend1442]

Just as well no commercial pilots believe earth is flat

[@mamamheus7751]

You've got a cracking little fisher there! That fish must have been half her height! You'll never persuade the "big names" of Flatland to "change their minds". You'd need one to start off with! Besides, I reckon that most if not all of said "names" know it's a lie (a certain chap with the initials MS can't lie for toffee) but they're making a bloody fortune out of peddling the lie.

[@revelationrevolution153]

Flat Earth has been promoted more by debunkers than the poor idiots that actually believe it, funny that.

[@Alysm-Aviation]

Making fun of the town jester has been entertainment for centuries.

[@my3dviews]

Just look at a so called Flat Earth map and see how far that plane would have to travel. Must do some mid-air refueling on the way and travel faster than the speed of sound. 😂

[@sthurston2]

Game over? It was never on in the first place. Reality doesn't care. The only question is will flerfs find the truth or not. My prediction is flerfs will be flerfs. I imagine the following sequence: Earth is flat, see there are no long distance flghts South of the Equator as they couldn't hide the distances being too big; Wolfie shows an actual flight; Yeah OK but that is just because um ah er well yeah JET STREAM! Its a really fast jet stream yeah thats it. A big jet stream blows the plane so it can go that distance in the time. See told you the Earth is flat. Flat Earth PROVED by this flight being pushed by a jet stream!

[@Mandelbrot_Set]

That was a big fish! Rainbow trout?

[@chipbowers247]

Turns out kicking a dead horse is fun. Nice fish!

[@tonydagostino6158]

I loved the comment "RELAX" on the flight board. We'll simply get a massive nuh-uh from flerfdom however

[@aerofiles5044]

Fake! You landed in a secret military base with decorations that make you think you're in Chile!!!!121!1!111!@!!11!!

[@studentjohn]

It is worth pointing out that if someone says 'it's because there are super-fast jet-streams jets can ride' they are, in effect, doing the same thing as blaming the non-changing apparent size of the sun, its rise and set, the apparent motions of the stars and planets etc, on 'atmospheric optics': I.E. they are saying 'it's flat, but the world conspires to create a very good illusion it's round'. If I buy into that idea to see where it leads, logically: As we live in the world, and therefore within that illusion, the 'round model' is therefore going to be more effective and the one we need to usually employ to _do_ anything. So the idea of the world being flat gets, in effect, relegated to a philosophical point, or an effectively-un-disprovable (and therefore not scientific) belief. Sorry you FE guys (if you're reading these comments), you are absolutely free to hold such a belief, and I'll argue with anyone who's personally abusive toward you for that, but in practical terms... that's what it becomes.

[@ramonortiz7462]

Wolfie!! I would like to formally apply to become an administrator or facilitator of some sort on this channel to......... 1.) Weed out the growing list of alleged airline pilot's who in unison repeatedly fail to defend their model thus proving they are not very familiar with it, or weren't paying attention in school,, simply forgot or lack aptitude per poor memorization skills! 2.) To encourage the production of an legitimate rebuttal! 3. To discourage the application of logical fallacy and to strategize an fair decorum of debate or discussion. My only requirements are that I be duly granted the authorito issue Steeeeee-rikes based on a three (3) point must system. Anyone in receipt of three (3) strikes will be placed in a time out hiatus of 30 days but not to exceed two weeks for first time violators! Now. Is there even one of you who can explain the why in why they don't know what gravity is itself in any fundamental way??

[@throwawayavclubber7269]

Hey everyone, please upvote ramon's posts. We want him to feel welcome here.

[@throwawayavclubber7269]

This has been up 10 hours and still no ramon? What is this?

[@iannicholson4169]

Sorry Wolfie. but Flat earthers just put their fingers in their ears and say bla bla bla

[@can709]

Its impossible -So the world is not f... +NO, the aircraft is a paid actor 👍🏻

[@Alysm-Aviation]

Short and to the point. Nice debunk of the flat earth cult.

[@ballsouttruth1169]

You clowns are going to get exposed today😅

[@Alysm-Aviation]

​@@ballsouttruth1169why? Can you explain how this flight can work on your fantasy disk? No? Flat earth debunked. Have you finally found a way to do something as simple as calculating your flight distances on a flat earth? No? Then flat earth debunked. You are making this too easy.

[@Wolfie6020]

@@ballsouttruth1169 Good to see you jumped instantly into panicked damage control within minutes of me posting a video. How is that flight plan coming along? Still can't do it? Still afraid to face me in a debate?

[@ballsouttruth1169]

@@Wolfie6020 kzbin.info/www/bejne/gXfdZY2QmZatoJYsi=1CAWn2ekoVzj9-Fv Globe killer

[@Alysm-Aviation]

​@@ballsouttruth1169omf, you fell for taboos BS? BAHAHAHAHA. now stop being a coward and set up that debate with wolfie.

[@AtheosAtheos]

The last sequence with Ema fishing is risky... What if she had caught a sole fish ?

[@FrenchCrow]

Southern hemisphere flights kill the "flaterf" more 😀 That airport is almost deserted, isn't it? And who dared to say that fishing is not a sport? 😅

[@muskyoxes]

You had to film the whole flight uncut, in order for me to deny that too

[@joepatroni8777]

Is this flight non stop?

[@Andrea2601M]

Yes.

[@tonymcflattie2450]

The Dreamliner, or rather the stuff or nightmares for flerfs.

[@fromnorway643]

The "Nightmareliner" 😀

[@eamonnsiocain6454]

Congratulations, Emma!

[@fepeerreview3150]

She's growing so fast!

[@mikefochtman7164]

Nicely done. But they'll ignore facts (as always). Oh, and always love the small 'Emma Outtakes' at the end. Have a granddaughter about the same age, took her to a 'petting farm' this summer and she enjoyed feeding the animals, just like your Emma.

[@aarocka11]

Honestly, there is no point in engaging flat earthers. The only people who actually care about these debunking videos are aviation and science enthusiasts who want to learn more about science and aviation.

[@AtheosAtheos]

Thanks Wolfie.

[@BudgiePanic]

Auckland? New Zealand mentioned!

[@Exilia2]

Flat people response: "maybe there's a wormhole in southern area that make the time travel faster despite the enormous distances in our pancake planet" 😂😂

[@ericrosen6626]

1:30 -- Tina eat. Eat the food!

[@kennethschultz6465]

you can´t beat that... BUT WHI ISEN´T THE LINE FLAT.. OOOH GREAT CIRCEL LINE

[@John.0z]

Emma is growing fast! 🙂

[@brad.fuller]

be where, the llama spits......

[@Sableagle]

Isn't it better to be where the llama spitsn't?

[@ramonortiz7462]

Predictions, renderings/graphs and circular reasoning with an dash of blatant appeal to the authority fallacy? What about that other graph your model provides of 4,000+ miles of topography per the Nile river which acutely negates curvature? The dreaded "elevation profile" of the mighty Nile river which outlines elevation in strict relationship to sea-level?!! Where is the alleged curvature that your air--plane would be flying over? Take a look! Your model quietly debunks itself!! kzbin.infoxPiN0fKJPq8?si=TzGdYHSHXqKUrYED

[@nounoufriend1442]

Measured to GMSL mate Global Mean Sea Level so your video proves the globe Anyway how about addressing this flight from Auckland to Santiago mate because its impossible on you pizza world

[@jamesdewane1642]

Very helpful, thanks!

[@lucvador2025]

One more 👉👌 for flat earther + 👍 for your vidéo

[@Alysm-Aviation]

1st

[@Wolfie6020]

Nice!, Thanks.

[@ballsouttruth1169]

Of course you're first, you both get the same government shill cheques

[@Alysm-Aviation]

​@@ballsouttruth1169I wish I would get paid for this. Debunking cowardly flattards like yourself would be the easiest job in the world... Ironically, a side effect of us pilots going to work is that we automatically debunk your little cult.

[@Alysm-Aviation]

@@david_akerman I turned a passion into a job and get to dismantle an entire religion just by showing up. A dream come true.

[@awatt]

​@@ballsouttruth1169 Thanks for reminding me to cash in a shill cheque. I need a new BMW because the ashtrays are full on my old one

[@peterhoebarth4234]

My Network mp say , nonstop , 28 Hours ( 1980 ). Earth is flat.

[@Andrea2601M]

No flight takes 18 hours non-stop. Can you stop lying or is it pathological?

[@newagecowboy40]

Why do all these globe shill accounts only post one video every 3 or 4 months yet have 70k subscribers ? Bots gonna bot I guess 😂

[@drosophilamelanogaster4262]

Do you have something meaningful to say or are you afraid of addressing the video?

[@Andrea2601M]

It's ever so ironic when empty channels with fake names and zero content accuse others of being bots. Now, explain the flight, smart guy.

[@newagecowboy40]

@@Andrea2601M not arguing with a smelly Indian shill or a stupid bot

[@nounoufriend1442]

@@newagecowboy40 Well how about addressing this video then ?

[@JacobLM42]

Because flat earth is dead.

[@reneberube9460]

Challenge Eric dubay to a live podcasts debate. Neil degrass Tyson wouldn’t , he’s a shill, I hope the case isn’t the same here.

[@titan9259]

Eric Naz! Dubay refuses to debate anyone.

[@ramonortiz7462]

How so is "game over"? I suppose you fail to understand that that SPEED would be a variable in this alleged flight? I sure would have liked to see people actually boarding flight and AIR---PLANE taking off..... And especially a look at air--planes ASI indicator to see how fast AIR---PLANE is really traveling but alas the "proof" required,, for belief in a globe is always indirect at best. So how does this alleged flight prove gas per your thermo-sphere and Exosphere can maintain a FIXED CURVING state directly,, within the alleged infinite,, and expanding,, vacuum,, of space??

[@Alysm-Aviation]

Oh hey, so you have no argument against this flight, classic.

[@bizarronorom9696]

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 You ACTUALLY asking how this flight proves the ionosphere???!!! Real special, aren't you?! You really think airplanes fly solely to teach you basic science and to "prove" things to you??? And, LOVED that issue you had with this clip! 🤣🤣 If he'd shown you people boarding, you'd have said the entire flight - all 12 hours- wasn't videoed, and so it's fake! And even if someone were to give you exactly that, you'd still say it's sEe JEe EyE! 🤣🤣🤣

[@qybosh264]

Oh, hello, Norom!!! Where have you been hiding away?! Your moronations have been missed sorely, buddy!

[@manojpri2001]

No rebuttals on your channel. And none here either! Very disappointing, -Ramon- Norom! I'd forgotten that's what you like to be called! (Thanks for the reminder, Qybosh!)

[@gruntled3049]

I was asking around about why no one has bothered to make a video debunking you. I was told that it's because you're a negligible, minor flerf who no one takes seriously. An insignificant light-weight who is quite harmless. Kinda' like an earthworm trying to be a donkey.

[@ramonortiz7462]

I would also appreciate it Wolf--ee if you would inform your pupils that I was invited here by YOU and to stop attempting to censor my posts!? Or review the comments and point out where I allegedly was rude etc etc? All you have to do is request my departure and I will. No problem as it is tiresome to endure the endless reasons & excuses as to why your "model" does not line up with real physical,, reality... Yes. I grow weary of the lack of an rebuttal therefore if certain individuals have no idea as to "HOWEVER if we are to be HONEST we dont know what GRAVITY is ITSELF in ANY FUNDAMENTAL WAY" please advise said pupils to either find out or resist the temptation to employ goobity goop. Thanks.

[@Alysm-Aviation]

Nobody is reporting you, your constant spam of new threads triggers KZbin algorithms.

[@qybosh264]

Oh, who requested your departure, Norom?! Is that why you ran away? You know you have your fans here! The entertainment you provide is just...

[@manojpri2001]

Oh, thanks for obeying me, -Ramon- Norom! All I had to do was ask why you weren't on Wolfie's channel yet, and HERE you are... like a good boy. A senior good boy. Let me find some treats for you... Your overlords Dubay and Oakley will definitely approve of your suggestibility and willingness to comply, and your overall gullibility. But, you still no rebuttal, eh? Five silver stars for Obedience! For Rebuttal, I'll give you half a red star.

[@AxelPixel-cx4wg]

Oh, looks who’s here! moronortiz, AKA the mctoon annhilator! Oh wait, you chicken out, didn’t you NOROM??? You pathetic liar!!!

[@adansantizo1609]

They know the reason why they can’t go straight there’s bio labs, there so they have to go around But earth is flat.

[@alexf962]

Lmao, cool bedtime story

[@paulpurdue5963]

Flying from Sydney or Auckland to Santiago might take the flight over Antarctica depending on the headwinds, but certain parts of Antarctica are off-limits even for certified ETOPS 330 airliners, because there is a whole other continent on the other side of the Southpole and the extra fuel needed could not be carried. Anyway, flights across the globe still did not prove what is in motion, the Earth or the Universe as neither would effect the actual flight.

[@Alysm-Aviation]

IRS and INS systems disagree with your statement.

[@paulpurdue5963]

@@Alysm-Aviation Measuring acceleration and rotation with additional inputs from GPS for aircrafts position has nothing to do with what's actually in motion, except the aircraft of course, and those instruments would alert the crew of they happened to fly into off-limits territory.

[@Alysm-Aviation]

@@paulpurdue5963 wrong, as per usual. Tell me how does a gyrocompass find true North?

[@paulpurdue5963]

@@Alysm-Aviation let's use as an example ; General Relativity, the pseudo-forces is not determinate from the reference frame. So either way the Gyroscope will find true north without the addition to extreme speed or temperature

[@Alysm-Aviation]

@@paulpurdue5963 I'm not sure you understood the question.

[@ramonortiz7462]

I don't want to annoy but in reality it doesn't matter knowing what shape the earth is in the scheme of things because even if above all else you know almost everything about science and physics ,, in that day it will avail us nothing if we do not know the Lord so remember that you must seek ye first the kingdom of God and the rest will be added unto you! Remember. In order to have materials the foremost asset is the ability of thought to form,, a plan,, process and repeated execution for more than one. The combined intelligence of man cannot reproduce even the most simple cell i.e. a bacteria cell so realize that if the combined intelligence of man has failed to do so that nothing from nowhere,, would not be successful either. My dearest friends I implore you to turn to God and He will turn to you! I promise!!

[@Alysm-Aviation]

It absolutely matters what shape the earth is... if it was flat navigation wouldn't work.

[@qybosh264]

You're not annoying anyone, Norom. Au contraire, your attempts to play a man of god is quite endearing! Cute, you know. How long before you start calling others names sanctioned by god?

[@BorClimey]

Why do you think a spheroidal Earth, and planets in orbit around their respective stars is beyond the scope of an all-powerful god? Aren't you undermining Him by assuming that He wouldn't be able to create a Spheroidal earth, and space and all?

[@atakerofmickies4300]

​​@@david_akerman A space comma comma?! Phooey! Mate, it's the guy who calls himself 'NOroM' and 'tHa mORoNAtOR' we're dealing with here: the guy who gave us classics such as the exclamation mark question mark question mark, the 'aerohyphenhyphen hyphenhyphen hyphenhyphenplane, Wolf-starstarstar starstarstar-ie, and many more! You ain't seen nothing yet! Space comma! Lol Makes me miss Conspiracy Catz, though...

[@Katy_Jones]

So... you are lyin fer jesus. Oh, and we already know your inane witterings have zero impact on reality.

[@7purse]

How high do we have to fly before we see the earth spinning 1000 miles a hour? And if earth spins from west to east at 1000 miles and hour. That means the plane has to fly faster than 1000 miles an hour to move forward 🤷

[@tgstudio85]

Rotation is measured in rpm kiddo, not in linear units. Maybe go back to school kiddo.

[@tgstudio85]

Earth spins at whopping 1rev per day... that is just 15degree per hour.

[@7purse]

@@tgstudio85 don't need school. I got Google. You go to school to get brain washed. I'll ask you. How high do we have to fly to see the earth rotate at 1000 miles an hour? To answer the question of how fast Earth spins, you need to know two things: how long it takes to make a full rotation, and Earth’s circumference. The time it takes Earth to rotate so the sun appears in the same position in the sky, known as a solar day, is 24 hours. However, the time it takes Earth to complete one full rotation on its axis with respect to distant stars is actually 23 hours 56 minutes 4.091 seconds, known as a sidereal day. With this information, to work out how fast Earth is spinning we need only our planet’s circumference. At the equator, its circumference is roughly 40,075 kilometres, so dividing this by the length of day means that, at the equator, Earth spins at about 1670 kilometres per hour

[@titan9259]

@@7purse Professor Dave's *The 10 Things That All Flat Earthers Say* video is for you.

[@gajustempus]

@@7purse ...if your math was correct, how is it possible for anyone to walk around in a plane, train or even bus once they're travelling around, eh?

[@ballsouttruth1169]

Come on puppy this is the perfect flight plan to live debate if you have balls and your controller's let you face me.

[@Alysm-Aviation]

He's asked you to email him to set up a debate weeks ago.

[@Wolfie6020]

Where is your flight plan? Why can't you produce one based on an alternative to the Globe? You have been told many times. Submit your flight plan for testing in a real aircraft then we will debate the results and you can explain the equation you used. No flight plans and no equation means you lose instantly. What part of this do you still not understand?

[@tomfromamerica8042]

Hey Balls, the ball is in your court *if you have the balls!* In this live debate tyat your propose, are you planning to admit that you're wrong, or do you mean to ignore the obvious facts and just scream "nuh-uh" and rage quit? 🙄😳😵‍💫 😂😂🤣🤣🤣

[@puppyupper4565]

Dude, you really ought to get on a plane sometime and travel internationally. I have been around the world twice going east nearly the whole way and seeing the countries as though they are on a globe. The flight times matched the schedule., I fly during the day as I can't sleep on a plane. And I stay over at all stops. First Time I went from Seattle nonstop to Moscow Russia. Then to Israel and Cyprus. Then to Dubai, then to Manila. Then to Guam,, then Hawaii and finally back to Seattle. If you look those places up on the flat earth map that would be a tortuous journey and take twice a long.. Think for a second, people fly internationally about a billion times a year. The only time you hear the flight took longer than publicized is if they had an emergency stop. The 2nd time was similar except I went from Seattle to London and I skipped Guam and went to Korea instead.

[@grahvis]

A question you will not answer because it will show you are talking out of your arse., How far is it round the Equator on a flat earth?

[@barstoolsandpowertools8617]

👍👍👍