Genetic Differences of Modern Europeans explained by Johannes Krause

[@Survivethejive]

Someone tell Krause that “north of the black sea” is not central asia - it is not even Western asia, it is Eastern Europe

[@Lyle-xc9pg]

Exactly survive the jive

[@conallomahoney9311]

Well its the border of Europe

[@conallomahoney9311]

@MafiaIntia yes

[@tomiantenna7279]

@MafiaIntia yes

[@tomiantenna7279]

@Secret Guy "Sincerely, Pleased_Customer187"

[@s66s46]

The last population that came to Europe were maybe the most influencal one. They were the proto indo europeans that came form western and central asia.

[@mrithulmkumar5263]

Its mindblowing how their language and culture streches from europe to india even if their genetic makeup is minimal in most places.

[@anuragsharma4159]

@@mrithulmkumar5263 but They were quite successful in making their Haplogroup dominant.

[@veronicalogotheti5416]

The indoeuropeans are from anatolia

[@peterjobovic3406]

@@veronicalogotheti5416 See Kurgan theory. Indoeuropeans are from pontic stepps.

[@veronicalogotheti5416]

@@peterjobovic3406 they were from anatolia Is proven Anita tablet hitites Yes they went around

[@micupedro]

I don't know where I come from, but I know this: the vast majority of my ancestors from the last 400 to 500 years are from central and southern Spain, many of them from northern Spain as settlers after the Christian conquests in Andalusia, from Galicia, Asturias, Cantabria, North of Portugal and Castilla-Leon. My ancient background is: 60% neolithic farmers. 32% Palaeolithic Hunters Gatherers and 8% metal age invaders. My y-chromosome DNA hapligroup is RM269 ( R1b) and the modern origin of my autosomal DNA is 57% Iberian, 10% Central Europe; 10% Ireland; 20% Italy (Sardinia and north); 3% Baltica-Finland. All this heritage of Celtic peoples, Iberians, Vascones, Aquitanians, Goths, Thracians, Latins, Illyrians, Rheti, coming from the East through the Mediterranean and the Danube and the Roman Empire and later barbarian emigrations.

[@SimpleMinded221]

@roberto lang No, but theres definitely hg A1 in European populations today. Hg A meaning the oldest hg originating and most prevalent today in Africa ( west, central, south and east )

[@didntknoicouldchangethis]

Excellent research plans! I enjoyed the video! Excited see more from this channel!

[@medit8iv_native970]

Can you please share with us- What Y dna genetic markers you have for the indigenous Europeans, the anatolians and the migrating Asians please!?🙏🏽🙏🏽 i am a polynesian from the c haplogroup, I am pretty certain on the "out of sunda land theory" for indigenous Europeans, Americans, Australians, oceanian, ainu and jomon, and North African berbers im dating it to be in sundaland around at least 45,000 years ago and migrating 12500 years ago after world cataclysm in sundaland. This is based off dna, archaeology, linguistics and cultural history and arts.

[@SimpleMinded221]

Indigenous Europeans are ydna I2 and I1

[@medit8iv_native970]

@Tuetonic Knight and what about the r1b gene?

[@SimpleMinded221]

@@medit8iv_native970 Well r1b and r1a come out of P ( P = Q & R ) which I think comes from the south east Asian region, but Q and R emerging in north eurasian regions. But indigenous Europeans are I1 and I2 being the only haplogroup that originated in Europe. Minor haplogroups in Europe in anceint times were ydna C , but they became almost non existent and not indigenous. Haplogroup I , comes from IJ which was likely in the anatolia region, and I split off in europe, thus becoming " indigenous " and mutating specifically in Europe.

[@SimpleMinded221]

And berbers are ancestrally a diverse population. They're ydna is E1B1B, which originated in east africa. And up to 15000 years ago, many north Africans were 2/3 iberomaurisan/natufian and 1/3 west African. So not all of north Africans are non african in origin. Also consider that coastal north africans are eurasian looking, yet the interior and other parts are brown and black. Humanity is diverse and not linear at all.

[@medit8iv_native970]

@@SimpleMinded221 you understand haplogroup c was around in a time in the first migrations? Were g,h,I come off f, whic is located in south west India, f comes off cf were it's a sibling to haplogroup c. These lines were from the migration 70,000 years ago. You need to update your maps and data bank from familytreedna instead of the outdated data you're using. Familytreedna is also the largest y dna bank in the world and is the most current 👍🏽 its actually pretty easy to tell where everyone comes from, using the out of sundaland method 🤙🏾 and knowing the geograph back to the start of the last ice age.

[@chicklets4ever51]

Brilliant young man, excellent lecturer.

[@KarinShah]

I’m sorry I ever read the comments. It makes me worry for the future of the human race.

[@tomiantenna7279]

Oh, don't worry, we won't make it for sure, you don't have to worry about *that*.

[@francesvansiclen3245]

Johannes Krause must be part Italian; he moves his hands quite a bit when he speaks !

[@claudiamarianidamato9499]

Frances Van Siclen not really

[@pennedarts]

LOL

[@mimm4332]

maybe but also german name... why do germans have such obsession with genetics XD

[@SuperTonyony]

@@claudiamarianidamato9499 LOL! He looked like he was having a seizure!

[@martinbeckmann9376]

@@mimm4332 because our genetics and history has been denigrated by rotten apples we welcomed with open arms . Google Scythians

[@toddhupp]

Great presentation.

[@nicolaosa.8167]

Sensational presentation and findings! Cant wait for new human genetic discoveries. Great work!

[@hans-joachimbierwirth4727]

Presentation only. There are no findings supporting his bullshit. Modern anatolians were not present on Anatolia when agriculture came up. Krause is just another idiot. He doesn't know what he's talking about.

[@marvinstephanie2085]

No findings to back it up? Are u kidding? What is DNA? Fairydust? Go bury your face in another book of lies. The court system uses DNA to catch criminals everyday...but as soon as its used to find identity of ancient people, somebody gets butt hurt and cries about it.

[@abrahamdozer6273]

@@hans-joachimbierwirth4727 Is everyone that you disagree with an "idiot"?

[@hans-joachimbierwirth4727]

@@abrahamdozer6273 Address the arguments or shut up!

[@abrahamdozer6273]

@@hans-joachimbierwirth4727 Precisely so! Address the argument rather than insulting the presenter and calling him an "idiot" That is the definition of trolling.

[@jamesirmert]

I would hardly say that no linguists had suggested that there might have been a massive migration from the step about 5 thousand years ago and also with it an influx of and major turn over of genetics. Many linguists have long believed that the origins of indo-European languages was in the step north of the Black Sea or possibly in Anatolia. With the degree to which Indo-European languages spread and the extent to which they did within what would seem to be a relatively short period of time, given the degrees to which they differ from each other, it seems to be that it’s almost certain that they spread largely due to population movements more than anything else. Which even in more modern spreading of indo-European languages has also been the case. Not that many people from significantly disparate origins don’t now speak said languages but the spread of those languages has first and foremost been due to population movements of modern Europeans (most recently). So it stands to reason it would likely also correspond to that in the past as well.

[@krisjustin3884]

Could this be why North Europeans do better on high fat/protein diets while the southerners do well on carbs? Fascinating discussion! Johannes Krause gives interesting lectures!

[@rooster0143]

The steppe component of the german population seems low considering the high proportions of haplogroups R1a and R1b.

[@mahakalabhairava9950]

Those are the Steppe components!

[@mahakalabhairava9950]

Along with some other haplogroups...

[@ayreign]

@rooster , which Y-dna haplogroup was carried by steppe people?

[@rooster0143]

@@ayreign My mistake. I intended to say the steppe component of Germany seemed low because of the LOW prevalence of Y haplogroup R. I've seen further evidence, however, that it ( R1a and R1b) may be above 50% in Germany. That's not insignificant.

[@De_Futura]

rooster 01 Scandinavians and Baltics actually have the highest amount of Steppe genetic component. Other Germannics and Slavics aren’t that far behind.

[@karczameczka]

Does the third group from "central Asia" could be orginal Indoeuropeans who spread the language (and culture?) almost to whole Europe? Do Basq are geneticly Descendants of orginal hunter-gatherers? middle-east farmers? What with Neanderthals - we've known Europeans have got some their gens. Does Neanderthal's genes are more frequent in the past population? Whitch one? So many questions! So fascinating! :D

[@veronicalogotheti5416]

From what i read The dutch today are viking huns

[@GGTanguera]

The Basques are originally Neolithic Europeans. But after the genocide of R1b you male population was replaced with their Y haplogroup. Likely, proto-Basques women survived and had children whom they taught their language and culture.

[@fucktugal_.y._fucktalunya]

@@GGTanguera ¿Really?

[@TrangNguyen-tn9pb]

It is possible that this group from "central Asia" spread the culture (pagan) almost to whole Europe. Because our ancestors (I am Vietnamese) who were also partly from south Siberia (central Asia) have a lot of pagan culture in new year that are very similar to European pagan culture. They also worshipped the Sun before Buddhism came to the land.

[@rafaelmelo2576]

I am sick and tired of people claiming to know where humanity came from, without even knowing what mithocondrial DNA is.

[@sareneharmony4718]

@steve gale , I get it, I'm very aware of many different things in this world including understanding how genetics works but I can admit I'm not always the most perfect spelling person all the time. I'm sorry if that disappoints anyone even though I'm ok with it since I have so many more important gifts many other people don't actually have.

[@joannechisholm4501]

We came from space

[@ginaibisi777]

I would love to find out about the people of each country when they moved to Europe or Balkan and where do they come from and the century they moved to Europe or Balkan?!

[@ergungeyikdagi3392]

Magnificent so well explained in just 15 minutes. Thanks a lot ,you are a great guy

[@johnmorris7818]

They keep advertising Grammerly...

[@SuperTonyony]

@@johnmorris7818 *Grammarly

[@ergnoorshehu6280]

Hi Johannes, I would like to have the title of a paper of yours about everything you explain here. I would like to use it as a reference for a book I am writing. My book is not related that much to your field of research but still has a common point with your work when it comes to people of Europe. You study them genetically. I would try to say something about them linguistically. I hope you will find time to answer me. Cheers.

[@dpcealla]

Great research! Thanks for sharing!

[@aidanM92]

Can we see the impact of this in modern peoples dietary needs? Are people descended from farmers more able to digest gluten, pastoralists less likely to be lactose intolerant?

[@danielteegarden8982]

brain food

[@andemaldonado1]

Remarkably interesting and well-explained presentation!

[@markw999]

Not to disparage this man's work, but this has been known about for a long time. The Indo-European invasion has already been well studied. Interestingly, he missed discussing the Basque population, which is important to study in contrast to the Indo-European population because they have stayed relatively homogenous genetically and linguistically all this time up in those mountains. Also, if memory serves (always tricky) Uralic languages like Saami and Hungarian appear to have developed about the same time as the Indo-European invasion suggesting other groups actively moving into what's now E. Europe about the same time. Where did they come from? And why did the language group survive when the Indo-Europeans were able to overwhelm almost the entirety of Europe culturally and linguistically? To me those are more interesting to study than the already previously understood migration of the Indo-Europeans, IMHO. And as I understand, the Uralic language group is also an indicator for genetic variations. I don't remember where that came from though, but the Saami (like the Basque) have stayed pretty distinct from the rest of Europe even to the present day. Lastly, agriculture was of course the innovation that drove the displacement - Hunter-Gatherers only generally had 1/10 the population density of early farmers - but I've read some speculation about disease resistance and dog domestication. The Indo-European movement also saw the eradication of the last of Europe's megafauna (like Irish Elk) and the speculation is they just outhunted the Hunter-Gatherers with better dogs in addition to whatever advantages agriculture brought. Always an interesting topic though. Mapping human movements through time is an interesting subject. What made those Indo-Europeans so successful though? They also swept South and East into the Indian subcontinent at the same time. Must have been a technology innovation that made them so prevalent. And usually that's a military innovation. Hard to displace people who are on an equal footing with you.

[@5Gazto]

Brilliantly and vividly explained.

[@andreassjoberg3145]

Some of the massive migrations might be because of rising sealevels. All the sea between japan and china once were dry land floodplains, and we know that those are the place where we find large populations and civilisations. Same in europe, all of the north-sea were dry land, what we now call doggerland, and in the meditarranean sea, a lot of the littoral waters were actually dry land, and the sea between africa and asia minor, was also mostly dry land or very shallow swampy sea. When those populations were displaced, they in their turn displaced other populations, the same way that later happened because of the goths and the mongols. We do not today know the exact date of all those rising-sea-events, but a lot of evidence points to a massive asteroid hitting the ice above north-america, and other pieces hitting even the oldest pyramids, sometime between 4000 Bc and 3000BC, this event leading to rising sealevels, very rapidly, and in its turn lifting loose a gigantic shelf of antarctic ice which fell into the sea, in turn further raising the sealevels with a tsunami-like effect. A lot of this is still debated and will take decades before it can be properly scientifically proven, but the individual data exists, and are proven. Did the sea rise 10m or 60m or 100m ? Did it rise over periods of hours and days those two times, or did it take years? Was there a massive super-tsunami that murdered most of the coast of the world during that period? What wars followed because of this? Well civilisation broke down, almost nothing is left in writing, and that only in myths around the globe. The myth of the great flood. The myth of the war in heaven between the gods. All our evidence is in Geology, in Glacier Ice-Cores, in the growth-rings of trees and preserved lumber pieces, in carbon-dating of artifacts in archeology, in what dates settlements suddenly died. Now also in the genetic drift of the remains of dead people, and their living family.

[@howardwhite1507]

I believe this event you are discribing happened, and is the reason for the change in culture. We went from tribal cultures to kingdoms and empires. People looked to strong leaders to deal with things they feared. This is when stone replaced wood as prefered building materials. This is what i think anyway.

[@veronicalogotheti5416]

Mongols are not huns

[@TrangNguyen-tn9pb]

the Sea Rise was about 10,000 years ago.

[@bonchance9241]

there is some thought that a Great Flood occurred approx 11,500yrs ago ..... it may have wiped out large numbers of people a new begining perhaps for mankind changed coastlines etc migrations to fertile lands perhaps very very interesting

[@theresemallory2425]

Absolutely ! There were massive and violent geological and climatic changes at the end of the Last Ice Age, around 11,500 years ago. We are still not totally clear about what caused it. It could have been a comet, striking the earth, a massive coronal ejection, explosions occurring at the core of our galaxy, which heated up our sun, or all of the above. Whatever the case, there was a massive extinction event going on at that time; It was a terrible time to be alive. Many larger animals such as woolly mammoths, saber tooth tigers, giant sloths etc were wiped out. And much of humanity perished in this catastrophe. Many of the human survivors had to migrate to safer, better places, in order to begin civilization anew. Those survivors are the ancestors, of all of us alive today. It might be worth your while, to check out the amazing work of Randall Carlson, Graham Hancock, and Paul LaViolette, if you haven't done so already.

[@TrangNguyen-tn9pb]

@@theresemallory2425 This Sea Rise is true from the history of our people in south east Asia. Our ancestors once lived in the place which is now Ha Long Bay in north Vietnam. Archeologists found artefacts near the coast and on islands around, the clay stuffs and also paintings on the cave wall on islands. Due to the Sea Rise about 10,000 years ago, they lost their homes and had to migrate up north to nowadays south China. They settled down there in some thousand years then great drought came and they had to leave southwards one more time. The interesting thing is when they were living in southern China, they met up with the people coming down from north in south Siberia central Europe (Devil's gate) and gave birth to us later. Hence in our legend our forefather was said being a dragon coming from the sea (the south) and foremother being a fairy coming from the mountains (the north). It was a legend until recently when the human genetic immigration map was finished and shows the 2 lines of immigration of our people. The more interesting thing is the genetic map also shows how people in Ukraine Steppe (Indo-European) was related with people from south Siberia, hence we somehow are related to Europeans as well. People at that time were not bound into any territory or nation, they just travelled wherever they wanted, and they were not hostile to each other maybe because there were too few people in large areas people consider each other friend more than fro

[@cariocabassa]

How did humans look like 7'000 years ago physically...compare to us their phenotypes ( First Farmers and Steppe Pastoralists ) for example???

[@michaels4255]

Based on their skeletons, the men were super studly, like very elite athletes. They would kick sand in Arnold's face. But by three thousand years ago, they were looking a lot more like us--wimpy, relatively speaking.

[@Beldoras]

@@michaels4255 What made us all wimpy? 🤔

[@TrangNguyen-tn9pb]

@@Beldoras convenient life.

[@ninjykun]

How does this reconsile with the studies that show the genetic difference between populations of people are less than 1% and that there is no definitive shared genetic trademark shared between all the people from one group?

[@johannageisel5390]

They have been investigating exactly those

[@soffiastefansdottir5719]

There are over 3 billion base pairs in the human genome, 1% of that is still a lot

[@SimpleMinded221]

@@soffiastefansdottir5719 Its less than one percent actually. Like what ? .2 to .4 percent ? Its not a lot. Humanity is one race/species along a spectrum

[@tlockerk]

Interesting brief discussion of long-term genetics. A map might have helped those silly people like me who still need a map to remember exactly where Anatolia is. But really, how many Europeans know exactly where Nebraska is without consulting a map? Thanks for the informative presentation, very well done research and presentation.

[@Koivisto147]

Google

[@johntate6537]

Reading the comments section on a science video makes me think of what it must have been like to visit a Victorian lunatic asylum. The more ridiculous the opinion, the more emphatically it is stated. Many of the people writing here need to go away and just read up on the history of science and just get a feel for how the enterprise is actually done. If you think it involves climbing to a piece of high ground and declaiming your self-serving belief system as unalterable truth, then I'm afraid you have taken a wrong turn somewhere. You're in theology.

[@redwolfmedia1276]

Here you guys are literally casting Judgement on others casting judgement then condemning them by crying racist! Hypocrites just like the Racist - fucks that have made it their mission to make sure White people or Europeans know there is nothing pure or sacred about their genetics and actually their not Indigenous to Europe! The Over-rated Geneticists that came up with this advance sequencing openly admitted their goal is to end racism! So they start with Neanderthal and then obsess about Europeans! Neanderthal genes are present in almost all Europeans and for this to be possible they claim European women more than likely chose to sleep with Neanderthals.They also claim we have depression more due to this genes,diabetes,adhd,etc..! Then they deep dive into our Ancestry and point out the obvious ,that we're a mixture of these People but where I call bullshit is them claiming indigenous Europeans were black! I'm no scientist but I can guarantee we haven't completely changed from short,stalky black people to tall,lean-muscled, pale,blue-eyed, blonde haired people! Come on and not to mention many well respected Arceaologists and Scientist don't believe we came out of Africa or if we did we didn't come from Africans! That's not racist baby,That's just common sense and trusting your own eyes! We need some Conservative Professionals to add checks,balances! Too much P. C. , S.J.W !

[@gremgreene2725]

@@redwolfmedia1276 you are a little insane.

[@gremgreene2725]

@@redwolfmedia1276 there is tremendous proof that civilization originated in the near and middle east and they were dark haired peoples. Race is blinding you.

[@gremgreene2725]

@@redwolfmedia1276 even recorded Roman ethnogenis mythology with is meant to purposely obscure origins for the uninitiated has Romulus coming from the Near and Middle East. Its safe to think they were some type of Brunette dark haired person. Race is blinding your intellect.

[@dickhamilton3517]

Redwolf and Adversary -- I'm 'white'. The genetics and archaeogenetics says that before about 10,000 years ago, there were no white people. White people arose in the North of Europe after H.Sapiens people got there, and it's where my ancestors come from (I'm from Celtic stock). 'White' is a fairly recent adaptation to the relative lack of UVB in Northern Europe, its necessity to penetrate to the dermis to produce vitamin D, and the fact that dark skin screens it out. It involves turning off only a couple of genes to go from dark to much lighter skin. There is another way to produce light-skinned people, but it's a bit more complicated, involves 4 or 5 genes, and produces the Asiatic type of skin colour - the Chinese, Laps, Siberian native tribes, etc. Without these adaptations, there would be no H.Sapiens people in Northern Europe - they would be sickly and unlikely to reproduce, or likely die, of lack of Vit.D.

[@peroskarsson8455]

A second wave of people came from "cemtral Asia the region north of the Black and Kaspian Seas" (i.e. north of Kaukasus and eastern Turkey). Does the maps provided in Germany show this as Asia??? A geografi lesson is needed no doubt.

[@rhetoric5173]

funny how he says near east, anatolia to avoid saying middle east ;) recently basal eurasian was shown to be form the Arabian peninsula, the original population from which asians and europeans are derived from.

[@rhetoric5173]

@@EuropeanAmericanGenZ_ND look up basal eurasian buddy he should be saying Arabian peninsula

[@rhetoric5173]

@@EuropeanAmericanGenZ_ND try again after doing some reading.

[@rhetoric5173]

@@EuropeanAmericanGenZ_ND What are you rambling about?

[@SimpleMinded221]

Basal eurasians dont have neanderthal input. Their phenotype is also quite interesting, but I wont set you off ;)

[@TrangNguyen-tn9pb]

I know 1 lineage from south Siberia was where Europeans and Asians were derived from, based on DNA of the bones in Devil's Gate, not hearing about the Arabia peninsula lineage.

[@maridaterri]

Too repetitive...very interesting stuff, but each point is so belabored I kept having to skip forward. A bit frustrating because I did want to hear the results of the research.

[@bonchance9241]

EUROPEANS ARE DIVERSE its Racist to say we all look the same we do not.

[@timothynicholas2127]

What a boring world it would be, if we all looked the same.

[@claudiamarianidamato9499]

Exactly ..

[@detectivethinker3637]

Well made point!

[@macinhorstemeyer1961]

I am Polish with dark hair and dark eyes and I have a cousin who is related by blood who is blond and has blue eyes.

[@xingatumatri1025]

That's not really racist but ok

[@helenaziegler6005]

Can we roughly tell the % of each of the three genetic components just from our phenotype? There is a classification of people based on personal colors (the color seasons) and from physical features (the Kibbe classification). Can these methods have a link to the genetic % of our three main ancestor groups?

[@tarquinogilvie]

To some degree. The phenotypes associated with Southern Europeans are an indicator of more Neolithic farmer DNA and Northern Europeans with Yamnayan DNA. Although the varying degrees and level of accuracy hasn't been fully explored. If it was de politicized, I'd love to see how phenotypes match up with DNA tests.

[@marcopony1897]

It is said, that the indigenous western european hunter & gatherers contributed the blue eyes to europeans.

[@TrangNguyen-tn9pb]

@@marcopony1897 It is also said the Steppe people from Central Asia contributed the blue eyes and blond hair to Europeans.

[@syrenaxhaferi7278]

Are they referring to caucasians in africa or black africans??

[@bandwagon22]

It was not farmers who first started farming. It was hunter gatherers who started it. Hunter gather culture lived thousands of year beside farming culture. There wasn't "sudden change" as many people are easily miscalculating. Population growth tells most of the story: from 2-4 million to 170 million during first 8 000 years.

[@Wolf-hh4rv]

So what was the physical appearance of these 3 groups?

[@trashpanda9615]

Europeans are the most diverse group of people on earth with blue green hazel to brown eyes. Red, blond black and brown hair pale to olive coloured skin and with every single combination of all those factors. The rest of the world has dark hair and dark eyes. It’s not racism to say Europeans are uniques in the world.

[@katrinajarrett4251]

@Siberian Hunter Try again bucko

[@katrinajarrett4251]

@Siberian Hunter Bullshit

[@marsiyahsteeltrap6536]

All of those colors came out of the womb of the kinky haired brown woman.

[@mjhmab]

Colors are not the only thing that matters. Sub saharans are the most genetically diverse and have the most different looks but the world is too euro centric due to colonialism.

[@corazoncubano5372]

@@marsiyahsteeltrap6536 Yes. The most genetically diverse people in the world.

[@mirad3818]

Could you please post a video about the Balkans so that they not fight about it any more, thanks!

[@ineedhelpsoundproofing]

Can you do one on East Asians??? The eye shape phenotype was it really born from cold windy conditions or did it happen way before they left Africa?

[@mafuaqua]

great video thanks!

[@Me2Lancer]

Thank you. It is good to see the interdependence between archaeology and genetics. It seems you just described my European ancestry. My confirmed haplogroup is U106, a descendent of P-25 (aka R-M343.) Prior to this confirmation I had a probable haplogroup of M269 but that is now relegated to an SNP of U-106. I liked and subscribed.

[@francescsosa931]

R1b l23 sicily

[@johnpatrick5307]

@rationalism Still less than the Britons though - and they had been re-colonized by Middle Eastern farmers, from France, about 1000BC!

[@Seaworthy99-1]

Did you have more extensive testing done> I am M269. Primarily Britain and north west European. I received my first surprise with my MtDNA--seems that I share the same DNA with many Swedes and Norwegians that I am unable to account for.

[@trevormatthews7981]

I have often wondered how genetics determined what a particular indigenous group was. For example I'm thinking of people taken from Africa and sold in to slavery in America. This sort of thing must have happened in other places too. The move from hunter gathering to farming is likely to have left traces in our DNA. A successful person in each group is likely to have different skills.

[@007mia7]

Trevor Matthews Trevor Matthews Please don’t believe what you’ve been taught about yourself. Your history has been hidden for a very powerful reason. If you are a descendant of the Trans Atlantic Slave Trade (in West Africa) you are most likely Hebrew (race not religion) and not descended from African people (The son’s of Ham) Your history has been hidden for a very specific reason. In 70AD after the Roman Empire attacked Jerusalem, many fled into W Africa where they were sold by Africans. This is why you were initially called Negroes, not African (because you are not). Then the name was changed to Colored, Afro American, African American, now currently Black. Your history book is The Holy Bible; & an account of the slave Trade is in Deuteronomy 28 starting at chapter 68

[@007mia7]

Trevor Matthews Begin here: kzbin.info/www/bejne/sHPMgKCNba2hask 👈👈👈

[@cariocabassa]

@@007mia7 We talking about facts here, don't you hear the man explaining accuretely genetics shifts with genetics FACTS backing up his claims!!!! You guys are all over spreading lies and fairy tales, what this video has to do with that " Hebrew Isralites " BS???

[@anonymousanonymous4690]

@@007mia7 you are brainwashed by black extremists

[@okmickey232]

Sadly, we are now living through the beginnings of another massive seismic change to the genetics of Europeans. Massive immigration into Europe from Africa and the middle east, combined with plummeting fertility rates, will see an almost total indigenous replacement, similar to the one 7 thousand years ago.

[@tradingbull007]

why is that sad? you already mixed with them 4000 years ago. what's the problem now?

[@okmickey232]

@@tradingbull007 🤔🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡

[@celtofcanaanesurix2245]

wow he really underplays the steppe herder admixture, you average German is like 30-40% Anatolian farmer, 40-50% steppe herder and 10-20% hunter gatherer, he must have gotten them mixed up, although he says in Spain only 5% come from steppe herders when its more like 25% so what is he on about?

[@r.v.b.4153]

The estimates of the percentages have changed. There is also more data available. Besides, steppe herder ancestry is also made up of European hunter-gatherer DNA, so this might make it difficult to differentiate them (note that his explanation is purposefully simplified). That being said, he does make some clear mistakes. As you said, the percentage of steppe herder DNA in Spain is way too low (I believe even way too low for the Basque country). It may have been a result of the sample size. I also find it weird he refers to the steppe herders as Central Asians, when these peoples originated in the Western Eurasian steppes fully within Europe. They sure had native Central Asian ancestry though.

[@koseku3]

hello im from anatolia and i have a quite heterogenous haplogroup

[@tomiantenna7279]

Mazel tov!

[@Aurora2097]

Reading the comments is tragic, he takes so much effort to explain everything and yet people don't get it. Likebthey don't WANT to understand.

[@adamkunzun5359]

Some comments here are racist .I am proud whatever Genes I carry I should admit whole humanity has evolved somewhere may be Africa central Asia or altai regions of north east whatever it may be am proud to he non racist loving human being the tiney part of humankind. I LOVE THIS GUY LOVE HIS RESEARCH.

[@corazoncubano5372]

Many of racist flock to videos like this to spread the false racist comments.

[@fabriceregnaut3540]

Of course the genetic studies will bring many new material for historians , and it is a shame that in my country France it is forbidden to make genetic studies ...

[@markkuuss]

we wuz kangz n shiiit

[@geoffreystuttle8080]

@@gooduH786 If one is an asshole for wanting their ethnicity to survive then I think you'll find we are all assholes.

[@fablb9006]

Sigmund Bosch french ethnicity exist, it is just not defined by genetics but by culture. Genetically there is not much in common between a Basque, a breton, a picard or a provençal... all are french but genetically different

[@colinwelling2454]

​@@fablb9006 The french can be defined genetically. Also, conflating the small differences between Basque and Bretons and enormous differences between Africans and French is very dishonest. Genetics and culture go hand in hand. Culture passes from parents to children as do genes. But genes themselves also affect culture.

[@sedwillful]

@@markkuuss According to the narrator; we were gods. Genetically, you were formed in my image. What continent do you find actual homosapien sapiens with no genetic admixture from earlier primates? And you're a genetic admixture of that sprung up 5,000 years ago; but you claim historical events that took place 6,000 yrs ago; go figure. Since you seem to be interested in genetics, you're aware that pigment derives from melanin? Two black people can produce a white baby; doesn't work the other way around kid.

[@davidnieves9084]

Wow! There is more to come!

[@jebatevrana]

What do you mean? Immigration crisis?

[@raulepure9840]

Extend this studies towards iranians, indians and central asians first Are IE genetically related and where is the origin of IE

[@raulepure9840]

I think Yamnaya are not the aryans but one of aryans population or a sister population or a derived one from aryans

[@raulepure9840]

Yamnaya are not of indian origin I just want to say that indoeuropeans are more complex and cant be reduced just to Yamnaya

[@Dryfee]

They are, google R1 haplogroup

[@hmcccpp]

the ie origins is south asia , teritories around caspian sea

[@raulepure9840]

R1 is more older than PIE and splitted thousands of years before, but from what i see PIE have both R1a and R1b, but R1b is older in europe than PIE PIE origin cant be south asia because, there is some european DNA type (easterm most) in India (most in IE speakers, high castes and males) but almost nothing specific Indian specific DNA in europeans (like H for male lineage and M for female lineage) except some gipsy influences Caspian Sea has nothing to do with South Asia, is just a junction between East Europe and Central Asia

[@susanlegeza7562]

Krause is a great teacher!

[@JackKrei]

Claudia Duma 2 months ago Do people dislike Europeans? The fact that older human bones in the Balkans (Europe) were found is ignored of course! But i guess this video is old because this article originally from University of Toronto is from May 2017. “7.2-million-year-old pre-human remains found in the Balkans” - “New hypothesis about the origin of humankind suggests oldest hominin lived in Europe” here is the source: www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2017/05/170523083548.htm

[@SimpleMinded221]

Nobody hates europeans, and the article says pre humans, not humans. Basically something like a proto chimp. Noone disagrees that pirimates could have been more wide spread than today. But OOA is more plausible due to haplogroup age and distribution ages

[@jboss1073]

5:11 - "of people that live in the Near East TODAY" -- WRONG. Anatolian Farmers were already European-like in Anatolia and nothing like modern-day Near Eastern peoples: Mathieson et al. 2015, p. 2. "Anatolian Neolithic samples do not resemble any present-day Near Eastern populations but are shifted towards Europe, clustering with Neolithic European farmers (EEF) from Germany, Hungary, and Spain."

[@einsteinwallah2]

is it possible to look at a human dna and predict if individual was capable of speaking dental consonants? ... is it cultural accident that many europeans cannot speak dental consonants? in sanskrit there two sets of consonants t-, th-, d-, dh- of which only dh- is spoken by english when they say the (=dhi) ... one set is dental and another set which is retroflex consonants (written in some transliteration notations using english alphabet T-, Th-, D-, Dh- like TomaaTo, Dhaakaa) ... partly at least european inability to speak both sets may have been forced upon them because of adoption of an alphabet which lacked enough characters to represent both consonants and culture of not teaching all sounds

[@ronaldnichols9945]

Agriculture and the move to plant based diets was not a good revolution as genetically people cannot eat that diet. A lot of people suffer from obesity and type 2 diabetes because of moving away from eating meat.

[@physlift9175]

the switch to agriculture was a bad move because it threw away thousands of years of evolution....not because of plant based diets.....hunter-gatherers actually ate a lot of plants and the main thing killing people in the western world is cardiovascular disease which is from eating too much meat. Hunter-gatherers would've ate no where near the amount of meat that modern humans eat and that is the problem.....don't forget that agriculture includes animals and farming animals for meat.

[@ronaldnichols9945]

@@physlift9175 The issue of increasing levels of heart disease, type 2 diabetes, and obesity is not caused by meat. That is the lie propagated by vegans and unscientific physicians. There is no scientific evidence that meat causes cardiovascular disease. There is increasing evidence that the current reliance on plant based diets high in carbohydrates and seed oils we have never eaten before the 20th Century is the cause of these diseases. Listen to videos of Dr. Shawn Baker and Dr. Ken Berry. Argue with them.

[@thedude9941]

If it wasn't for the move to agriculture we would all be brown skinned, and there would be no racism. Too late to go back in time, and tell the European populations unfortunately 😂

[@aug-pahunters51]

This is fascinating and I've been thinking about this for 20 of my 34 years of age. As a PHD in economics, I find I need more data from anthropologists during the 5k year bc plus time towards 1st evidence of homo sapiens. For example: Please explain why the Egyptian Sphinx was altered. The head doesn't match the scale of the body. A untrained child can see as much. Perhaps I'm wrong, but a gut inscinct tells me a larger sandstone head was recut. Therefore whomever built that area of Cairo, could be much earlier. Rationally, why would a society, out of the blue, architect something so precise as Giza. Hard to understand and I'm under the impression we have the info incorrect.

[@andreassjoberg3145]

One reason for altering the Sphinx is probably erosion damage, another pure politics, and the wildcard is that it was damaged by asteroid bombardment....the only thing we know for sure is THAT it was altered, and that it is far older than the surrounding pyramids, and that it probably had a twin on the other side of the river, currently under water. We took away most the statues of Stalin and Lenin. We blew up a lot of swasticas after Hitler died. We will probably remove a lot of statues of Nathan Bedford Forrest soon. Who can say for sure why they altered the sphinx?

[@ottarvendel]

Krause is dizzy calling the region North of the Black- and Kaspian Seas "Central Asia"! Why not South East Europe?

[@darkoneforce2]

Ukraine and S.W. Russia is not central Asia.

[@korneliusjansen542]

Right. The guy may be a great scholar in his field. But his geographic knowledge is worse than that of my 10-year-old daughter.

[@EarthChronicles2]

So who where "these people bringing agriculture to Europe from Anatolia" ? And which modern population most closely resembles them? And also, what language would these "Neolithic Anatolian migrants" have spoken?

[@alexdunphy3716]

Since Anatolia has experienced so many migrations and invasions they are no longer the same genetically speaking. As far as I know the closest present group are Sardinians with close to 90% of their ancestry coming from the ancient Anatolian farmers

[@De_Futura]

Greeks, Italians and Spanish. Their language is extinct in Europe and is actually unknown. Most today, speak Indo-European languages, that came from the second migration into Western Europe from Ukraine, Russia. The guy said Central Asia, but it’s incorrect.

[@EarthChronicles2]

Except, when i examine a genomic chart of haplogroup frequencies in modern populations, Sardinians aren't 90% anything...they are a heavily admixed population. As are Italians, Greeks, and Spaniards... Let me refrase my question. Which Haplogroup specifically, Mt and Y dna, is representative of Neolithic Europeans ?

[@poldertalk]

interesting but the end is overdone

[@plumcrazypreston2797]

This man has a German name but his mother must be Italian. He would really look charming with a clean shave.

[@RaymondInternational]

How much African DNA is present in Northern European whites? *(European whites have African DNA because of their colonization of Africa and their involvement in the Slave Trade.)

[@epicccurusaurelius2634]

Very little.

[@TrangNguyen-tn9pb]

the cluster of African DNA is very far away from the rest of the world. Hence the theory Out of Africa is debunked.

[@wilka171]

It's actually out of Europe, into Africa and back into Europe. The only three hominids that humans could come from are all from Europe. Why these people never mentions this is a mystery to me.

[@magd4570]

Would you be interested in a bone of possibly 900,000 years old to research its genetic makeup?

[@FreyjaElisabetFarang]

The North of the Black Sea (Ukraine and South Russia, Yamnaya culture or people) is not part of Asia or Central Asia, it´s located in Eastern-Europe. According to these findings we can state that culture is downstream from genetics or demographics.

[@ZEHM89]

The idea that there wasn't an acknowledgement of a cultural influx from the steppe 5000 years ago is flatly bogus. That's the entire JP Mallory model for how the Indo-European languages got to Europe, by stark contrast to Colin Renfrew's Anatolian model.

[@bethbartlett5692]

*Caution Researchers,* when preparing your Research Study Subject Question and Foundation, it is essential that one follow precisely the Scientific Ethics and Standards of Researvh Methodologies and Data Analysis, beginning with the title of the subject and including any "presumptions, as they must have full factual foundation". Example: here he mentions a reference which includes a presumption that does not qualify and fully accepted, Peer Review Journal Standard, as fact and that is: ... all out of Africa "Theory" It should be a "dah!" But we often make these blooms without Conscious Thoughts. On the subject, that theory is losing thrust. The evolution theory having been realized as inaccurate due to genetic studies the missing link was a DNA tweak 200,000 years ago. Gregg Braden spoke to this and it can be viewed on his Channel. Genetists are proving to be the link we needed to bring facts to the forefront and hopefully Mainstream Academics can adjust and get on the more Authentic Page. Human DNA a source of vast Facts. Thrilling to now and to History. Best Wellbeing all ...

[@richardjames3774]

Hi there... how are you doing? Hope you are fine and staying safe?

[@djmartin8535]

Please consider expanding your research to the Native Americans to either support or refute their claims as reflected in their myths. This would include both North and South America. Thank you.

[@lindaliljecrona4404]

A lot of the studies are done at universities in Europe, I think the universities in the Americas need to do what you want. kzbin.info/www/bejne/epyZZoeYf7eBlaM

[@guidoylosfreaks]

We came from East Asia, mostly Siberia.

[@edwardchamplingmail]

They're working on it. Making up for past mistakes of others is one problem. Another is getting approval from Native Americans to make sources available to work with.

[@corazoncubano5372]

@@guidoylosfreaks And before that????

[@jeffreyhawthornegoines8727]

I certainly do not intend to contradict many of the comments which are extremely positive; the gentleman is obviously very competent but I find personally that this is very general and abstract, the exemple of Germany being the exception. Otherwise, it tends to remain very theoretical

[@nco1970]

Very interesting and very well explained.

[@VeridicusMaximus]

I hear so much about this non out of Africa idea but can anyone actually link some studies and not KZbin stars, Euro-centrists, or bloggers for this info?

[@plaguedoctor1544]

Look up Survive the Jive. He is good for this

[@thedude9941]

No they cannot.

[@TrangNguyen-tn9pb]

the clusters of African DNA is far away from the rest of the world, hence the rest of the world can not be derived from Africans. I don't have the link but I still remember that graph that shows African cluster looking like another species.

[@Top5Aircraft]

What a great mind. And presented in a second language.

[@joannechisholm4501]

What about the UK

[@jdlc903]

There are no Europeans there

[@nderimmehmedoski496]

I saw that many Balkan human doing dna 🧬 analyse and evry one of them have betwen 1 and 15 % relative dna specialy Albanians.

[@EarthChronicles2]

Key in to 3:32. " reconstructing the ancient genomes" which means they are recovering small fragments and essentially making up the rest. So there you have it; proof of no proof at all.

[@sarnajohar2675]

Sir tell of india dan group

[@matthewmann8969]

Some have more admixture with East Asians, Middle Easterners, North Africans, Sub Saharans, Ashkenazim, And Gypsy

[@siberiantiger9976]

all have admixture with East Asians

[@natanyaaberra4984]

It's all basically eurasian, Anatolian and hunter gatherers including Ashkenazim, Sephardim and Mizrachi, Romoni, Arab. Northern Africa DNA originated in Eastern Africa proper DNA from Lower Africa is present in Northern Africa too.

[@mjhmab]

@@natanyaaberra4984 modern north africans came from near east 12000 years ago and mixed with the ancient north africans who were only 1/3 sub saharan/east african. Today's north africans have only 10% sub saharan dna.

[@Ador828]

Now changing fast due to major world immigration into Europe, their are provinces in Spain with minority both parents spaniards

[@thepwrjunkie7378]

He takes a long tie to say what he wants to say

[@SuperTonyony]

He wasn't wearing a tie.

[@MaikeVogtLueerssen]

Wonderful presentation!!!

[@Digletdiggy]

"Those people" from the asian steppe are called Aryans or Indo-Europeans. Why does he refrain from mentioning their name?

[@extratropicalcyclone8567]

Aryans are another name for indo-Iranians, the whole group is called indo european

[@Krawn_]

@@extratropicalcyclone8567 The Aryans were removed from Iran and moved into Europe

[@aidanM92]

Well you see, there was this guy named Hitler who did and said some things during WW2, and since then it has been unpopular, especially amongst Germans to acknowledge their supposed "Aryan" origin. (There's also a limit on what you can say and publish without "special interest" groups trying to censor you, perhaps understandably after what happened last time). The Hindu nationalist movement is also resistant to believing the Aryan migration hypothesis because it leads to the conclusion that Aryans build ancient Indian civilization and the dravidians were lower caste, or slaves.

[@aidanM92]

@@Krawn_ yes but the R1 haplotype remains in Iran, so they didn't all migrate.

[@ezzovonachalm7534]

It sounds as if the author of this video is a scholar of Soros 's open society and stop culture ? Wir sind alle dasselbe Brei !

[@mariohamster7879]

Warum spricht er nicht deutsch ? Soll die breite Masse in Deutschland nicht verstehen was er von sich gibt. Es ist sehr unhöflich, auch seinem Land gegenüber.

[@gordonpi8674]

It’s very obvious. The R1b group in Western Europeans makes them aggressive, conquerors, forcible rulers enslaving other nations, profit runners and without any sense of collective life and social justice, but with lots of individual freedoms. On the other hand, East European R2 a group is for a peaceful life and mutual collaborations, non aggressive and non insiders, appreciating what they have and not competitive for profits and with a high level of community and social justice, but expecting conformity and a limited freedom. Those are roughly said 2 worlds that can hardly intermingle, causing the tensions East-West, and wars. If the positive sides of both can be put together, like in Scandinavia, Canada and Austria, that would make an ideal society.

[@gordonpi8674]

@J Boss that’s the positive side of R1b, all the rest is the negative side. The negative side of R2a is the limited individual freedom, especially limited rights of minority groups. So, neither group is ideal, although IMO the Western European is a little more negative in total. As I noted, the best of both groups is found in highly civilized and progressive social democratic societies of the Nordic countries, Canada and Australia

[@DG_5856]

Hahahha.. eastern european being pacefull? Just look at the balkans, they are brothers and kill eachother

[@gordonpi8674]

@J Boss Hi, I am happy to have you agree with my points, I would expect that from any smart and educated person, who sees the things objectively. As for how do I know, well, I am also interested in topics that elaborate this area. I started to see the difference between Western Europeans and Byzantine (Eastern) Europeans since I was a kid. What was very intriguing for me was how why the Eastern Europeans are so smart in real, but they only influence the world through the western developed societies. After moving to the western world, I witnessed all that I wrote about the westerners, plus, I would add, the lack of preciseness in defining crucial things (hint, although English is number one language in the world, it’s still not written in a smart, phonetic way like all European language, but you have to stupidly memorize the spelling of the words, etc.). Another thing I would add, and that is different than in eastern societies is using the partial truths ( or white lies) in communications with others and manipulating the deal in your own advance. Anyway, I don’t want to be too long, I will just say that once I accidentally watched a documentary from a Serbian/Croatian author on the characteristics of the dominant European genetic groups R1 and R2 (eastern and western European A) and was amazed how his analysis completely covered my observations and findings about these 2 groups. His documentary was actually about the findings about the Vinca culture, which was the oldest Indo-European discovered in Serbia, and a centre of R2 group. His point was, that that culture existed in peace and mutual respect and cooperation with others until the barbarians (R1 bearers) from east destroyed it and enslaved its habitants. This repeatedly happened many times again in European history and with the western colonization of Americas, Asia, Australia, Africa, etc. So, that was a great moment of discovery on this topic, and I am happy the truth is coming out slowly, but surely. If you want to see videos on this topic, go to the channel named ‘Goran Saric, anthropology and science,’, etc. it just his name is enough. The only thing is his speeches are in Serbo-Croatian and very few of them are translated into English. I can direct you some interesting ones whenever I see them again. That’s all for now, I hope I answered your questions. Good research!

[@gordonpi8674]

@Falk Those are the truths that can be comprehended only by greater minds than yours. You are not mentally capable to realize that, you are not smart enough to see those truths. All you write is worthless.

[@randomfella8084]

A bunch of weirdos in the comment section saying he has a political agenda because of the humans out of Africa theory. I don't think these people are able to comprehend basic science.

[@jordiadr]

"We know humanity started in Africa". Which proof do you have for this statement?

[@dinsel9691]

If you do not know the answer to that. You are way too ignoramous on this topic... and it would require a vast amount of educating material to bring you any closer to understanding why he said that.

[@jordiadr]

@@dinsel9691 There are proof and indication. Even if there is great indication it doesn't make it a truth.

[@corazoncubano5372]

Please further your education. Your lack of it is quite evident.

[@rpetit67]

See also Videos from David Reich and also this recent article from him in NY Times : David Reich : " “Whites” are not derived from a population that existed from time immemorial, as some people believe. Instead, “whites” represent a mixture of four ancient populations that lived 10,000 years ago and were each as different from one another as Europeans and East Asians are today" (How Genetics Is Changing Our Understanding of ‘Race’, NY Times, 23 March 2018) www.nytimes.com/2018/03/23/opinion/sunday/genetics-race.html

[@Bluemax54]

Is there a commercial DNA test which will tell the percentages of these three?

[@danielteegarden8982]

Great Channel. thky

[@LatestThinkingChannel]

Thanks so much!

[@bammalife8387]

They say the druids were of North African descent

[@thma8423]

Who "they" ?

[@bammalife8387]

The first Europeans came from north africa

[@thebrocialist8300]

Iberians have substantially more Steppe admixture than ‘5%.’ (Galicians and Catalonians average about 30% Steppe ancestry). And the highest amount of Neolithic Anatolian found in the peninsula is a little over 60% (in Vascones). Iberians also have the highest levels of WHG in Southern Europe (Basques have even higher levels of WHG than most Central Europeans). Greeks and Italians, on the other hand, have the lowest levels of Hunter-Gatherer ancestry in Europe - and also have substantial levels of additional Levantine admixture (which render them, along with Finns, the most outlying population in Europe.)

[@SoulF15]

Not true, actually Italians have the highest steppe of all southern europeans, and it makes sense looking at their geographic position (the northen ones can reach 35 or even more) for the rest yes all Italians have more anatolian than Iberians, but the "levantine" is negligible and restricted only in some areas.

[@fucktugal_.y._fucktalunya]

¿Really?

[@mollydacostaCaleigh]

@@SoulF15 you are wrong, read the investigation made by Harvard University in Iberian Península, is published (Nature and Science).

[@asamanyworlds3772]

We're you had trade you had mixing

[@johnbecich9540]

I like Professor Krause's conclusion: That he and his genetic studies, and publications thereof, are giving a voice to millions of people who didn't "have a history." Maybe they were too busy working, and surviving, to invent writing and to write books! I greatly appreciate Professor Krause's efforts, to bring his findings to people like me, who "occasionally resemble barbarians"!: I was very busy studying engineering as a young man, and making a living from it during my middle years, and so now I'm "hearing ancient voices" ! Thank you, KZbin, and Professor Krause.

[@ThomiX0.0]

Good explanation, brought to us with passion :-) I wonder, if it is for a scientist a rightful dissision to name the groups of study, hunter-gatherers or early farmers? Why not use a code, to keep all the researchers free of conceptions? Afterall, when this passioned Johannes Krause, which I am likely to hear about his studies, loose his tools and social structure today, he will become from then on, a hunter-gatherer himself.. Starting all over again, with knowledge one cannot use. We now start to see some major changes in the past, which gould have deminished the population dramaticaly around the end of the last ice-age. Specialy in the costal areas opposite of Northern America, due probably to huge amounts of meltwater in a sudden burst. This has to give researchers as in the field of which Johannes Klaus works, very strange datas! It might already give us a sign of such hapenings, in the data now recoverd, mentioning the incomming populationmix of Yanmaya-genes and Sicilian-genes who came from a safe area, behind the kaukasus and the Alps. Interesting to see how this study envolds. Thanks for sharing!:-)

[@dickhamilton3517]

yes it's right, because the minerals in the bones tell you what they were eating. The archeologists/paleontologists found people sharing the same small areas where some were eating a hunter-gatherer diet and people sometimes only yards away or sharing a settlement were living mostly on farmed grains. All mixed up. Look for Reich too, on YT - he does the same kind of work.

[@stefanijaharris7566]

A lot of holes in his explanation. He never tells how big are his samples and where in Europe do they exactly come from. One can have foreign intrusions in one ecological area without much impact on the areas surrounding it. A case in point is the Mississippian Culture of ancient North America that came out of Mexico, and occupied the Mississippi River Valley from Gulf all the way to the river's northern reaches in Trempealeau, Wisconsin and along some major of its tributaries, from around, 800 to1600 AD, which had not left much mark, if any at all, on any of the surrounding Woodland cultures. An 800 year span and no cultural mixing including linguistic. As for his supposition that Hungarians look just like any other Europeans, I beg to differ. In my own family, my father's mother's side were all ethnic Hungarians, and my father as all of his five siblings had slightly slanted eyes, as do many other Hungarians.

[@gremgreene2725]

Such intelligent work.

[@danielebbes6972]

Of course what you expect from Germany 🇩🇪 always great

[@nderimmehmedoski496]

Im not Professor of history or dna expert. I come from Balkan and i live at the moment in switzerland. After i came hier i started to think why some central european locking like my Balkan Friends. Specialy swiss, france, italy and germans. And i see wenn they doing dna analyse thats the prove what you are telling. The history was very precisely written whay before the dna came out. We are all mixd. Some more or less

[@evgenijtitovskij6708]

Are European Jews Europeans or Middle Easterners?

[@alexdunphy3716]

Genetically they are about half way in between

[@alexdunphy3716]

According to principal component analysis studies

[@whatabouttheearth]

They are Europeans originally from the levant. Even R1b Europeans arent originally from Europe

[@francescsosa931]

European jews= sicily

[@ezzovonachalm7534]

They are Jewropeans ( the ashkenazim) whereas the sepharditim are higher carat jews because they did not intermingle.

[@filofteia1]

Amazing how a bit of science can stir up so many emotions . We're watching a bit of genetics/history information and it seems to me we've never learned from history.Perhaps is better to have comments turned off for these sort of vids

[@LatestThinkingChannel]

We support a lively discussion and will keep the comment function open to anybod, but will delete comments which are disrespectful or discriminatory. Thanks for watching our LT-Videos :)

[@jiritichy7967]

Too much talking and repetition instead of showing data and results

[@nataliadavtyan7622]

in language-gene context, this research would make more sense considering that Anatolia was one of the recent replacement terms for ''Armenian Highland''