Leaving Medium Format for this Full Frame Camera!

Go to squarespace.co... to get a free trial and 10% off your first purchase of a website or domain.
🌟Get My FREE Lightroom Colors Course🌟
markdenneyphot...
In this week’s episode, we discuss my leaving Medium Format for a Full Frame camera. For the past three years I've used the Fuji GFX100s medium format camera to capture my landscape images, which I've been very happy with. But, recently I noticed a troubling trend with regards to the photos I was capturing with it that led me to looking at the other available options on the camera market today. It's been quite a few years since I've seriously entertained the idea of switching camera systems, and in this video I'll review why you haven't seen me using my medium format camera recently - along with what my plan is moving forward. I hope you enjoy this week's video and as always thanks so much for watching! - Mark D.
📸 NIKON CAMERA & LENSES
🔘 Nikon Full Frame Camera: bhpho.to/3KZf3aa
🔘 Nikon Wide Angle: bhpho.to/3VWbPdW
🔘 Nikon Mid-Range: bhpho.to/3xHbpi1
🔘 Nikon 24-70: bhpho.to/4cyykLs
🔘 Nikon Long Lens: bhpho.to/3KXEitp
🌟UPCOMING WORKSHOP SCHEDULE
🔘geni.us/markde...
RECOMMENDED GEAR PAGE
🔘geni.us/myfavo...
🧰 MY FILTERS & ACCESSORIES
🔘Best Filter Kit: geni.us/filterkit
🔘Black Mist Filters: geni.us/blackmist
🔘Top Camera Bag: geni.us/favori...
📺 WATCH THESE PLAYLISTS NEXT
🔘Composition Tips: geni.us/compos...
🔘Beginners Guide: geni.us/Beginn...
🔘Editing Tutorials: geni.us/Editing
🔘Tips & Tricks: geni.us/Tipsan...
As an affiliate marketer & Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. I earn a small commission on the above links if you decide to purchase the item at no additional charge to you.
#landscapephotography​​
*LETS CONNECT*
Morning Blaze: markdenneyphot...
Instagram: / markdenneyphoto
Facebook: / markdenneyphoto
Twitter: / markdenneyphoto

[@MarkDenneyPhoto]

🔥QUESTION: Which camera brand do you use?

[@mrfairycake4333]

Sony A 7iV

[@Ericbjohnston5150]

Started with a minolta 3000i film camera. Moved to a canon 300D to a t5i to a 40D to a 7dmk2 stopping for now with a 5Dmk4.

[@MrEdIsTheSource]

Nikon

[@kswsquared]

Nikon, though I don't do commercial work. I've comfortably shot Canon in the past too though, my first camera was a Canon bridge cam pre-2010s. :)

[@dfinlay587]

I shoot a Nikon Z6, after having Nikon D3100, D7200, before that Sony, then Canon SLR, and Minolta SLR

[@DarrenRussinger]

The dynamic range on the Z8 is incredible!

[@edc641]

I'm a Sony shooter and own the Tamron 50-400 which is a great lens. Combined with a wide angle lens I can get away with using two lenses only for most situations. I appreciate the small form factor of my system, especially when hiking for multiple days. When I'm out in the wild for a copule of weeks I usually only bring my Sony camera and the Tamron 28-200, which gives me a ton of options while also keeping the weight and size down to a minimal level. I don't like switching lenses when in harsh environments far away from civilzation and that setup solves that issue. That being said, the other day I met a random person when I was out shooting birds. He was carrying a Z8 (which I had never seen irl before), and he asked me if I wanted to try it out. MAN that camera felt great in the hand! Such a pleasure to shoot with too. I've never tried Sony A1 out, but the price of that thing is just way too high and not giving me personally the value for money I'd get with the Z8. I love the lens options I get with E-mount but if I started new today I'd probably invest in Nikon. Z-mount has enough options for my kind of photography even if I'd miss my beloved Tamron 50-400.

[@fotovylety]

Same here. 50-400mm with 16-35 is so versatile over three lens setup for landscapes as long as you shoot it on tripod. The 50-400mm is not perfect lens, in fact testing it test chart was a disappointment, but my comparison with two 100-400 lenses on actual landscapes (a lot of 60mp comparison samples on my website) shown that it is really good. I use 400mm in some landscapes a lot. 400mm also works for moon with landscape photography which is my favorite (I have an article in English and Czech on my web with advice how to plan it and photograph it).

[@edc641]

@@fotovylety When I was researching the lens I found your comments on a forum (with a link to your website). Very informative and good comparisons. But I found it surprising that the lens didn't perform that well on your test chart, when others on KZbin showed a solid performance. I haven't tested my lens on a test chart but I've done some quick comparisons with my 200-600, a lens I'm very pleased with, and I found the Tamron to be more equal than different to the Sony. Anyways, the 50-400 is the lens I use the most. Love it!

[@Shashank-DivineChild]

Hey aren't there sony to nikon adapters available on Amazon. Your Tamron lens will not be wasted if you can find one.

[@edc641]

@@Shashank-DivineChild megadap pro is THE adapter. I've been looking into that one, but unfortunately AF doesn't seem to be super reliable for fast action. I think I'll wait and see what Sony does. My hopes are that they will release something equivalent to Z8 at a reasonable price. They need to wake up. A9 lines is at global shutter now and they can't keep stacked sensors for A1 only. But I don't know. If they don't release what I want in the near future I might consider making the move to Nikon.

[@Shashank-DivineChild]

@@edc641 The Z8 is already a Z9 equivalent at a reasonable price, so a Z8 equivalent at a reasonable price. Seems unlikely. Anyways best of luck for your search.

[@NetGawker]

I KINDA did the same thing, although I'm keeping all my Fujifilm gear. I added the Nikon Zf to my arsenal. No matter how much I love my Fujifilm bodies, the noise in low light made me add the Zf.....and I dont regret getting it.

[@pradippatel9345]

I have been a Nikon shooter for 40 years. Welcome back to the family.

[@wm1573]

That sounds so corny lol

[@dr.jensmasselmann901]

Exactly my thoughts...came up with a different solution: Combined my GFX plus 45-100 mm with X-t5 plus 100-400 mm and added 16 mm prime lens to go wide too. Superbe quality and backup at the same time.

[@Wannes_]

If the reason was DoF, going for APS-C would have been the answer 🤔

[@lillirod]

Upgraded from D850 to Nikon Z7ii,14-30mm f/4, 24-70mm. Love the compact lighter body and sharp lenses of the Z line. Welcome back to the Nikon family!

[@jwleemedia]

Welcome (back) to the family! For your 14-24 2.8, ditch the plastic hood that came with the lens and pick up the Nisi metal hood. It has a better light seal for doing long exposures. The 112mm Kase magnetic ND and CPL set is fantastic and they also make a magnetic night sky filter for it as well.

[@allenriley2483]

I totally agree with your choice in this video . I’m enjoying my Z8 and 100/400 & 24/120 combo.

[@OriginOutfittersMaine]

I was a Nikon shooter for years, then switched to Sony due to Nikon not having a mid range camera with the video features I wanted in camera (10-bit, 4:2:2 Log etc). Immediately upon switching I realized just how amazing Nikon glass actually is. Happy to say I’m back to Nikon now with the Z6iii 🤙🏼

[@davetv8171]

I’ve had both for a while. Interesting enough the Sony lenses are so nice adapted to the Nikon. I need more time with the z6iii. I find it can drop focus on some frames compared to the Z8 I had previously. Hopefully firmware can improve that. I noticed the same with the Z6ii as I shot Salsa with it previously. I find the A7C2 just as good as the z6iii which is crazy with the AI autofocus Sony is bringing to their latest cameras. I love the 135 Plena.

[@timryan894]

The 14-30 and 24-120 f/4s are brilliant lenses. I use both for my professional architecture work. Very light weight. Image quality is nearly identical as the 2.8 counterparts. I don’t need the wide open, so the f/4s work for me. Nikon NEF files are a main reason I love Nikon- so much post processing control. I’m happy for you.

[@RichardBO9]

Three weeks ago, I bought a Z8. I debated between the Z8 and the GFX, but the lack of a long lens was one of the deciding factors. I have the 14-30 and the 24-120. I am leaning toward the 300mm PF with the FTZ adapter. I haven't yet had much time to use it. Your photos are top-shelf gorgeous. :)

[@photoman3579]

OM Systems, puts a great big smile on my face every time I pick it up, which is nearly every day. Low light no problem Topaz AI. !

[@TonyGouge]

Welcome to the Z8 world Mark! Love mine and love hearing your discussion about the various lenses!

[@MarkSmithPdx]

Mark, if you stick with this system and the 14-24 f2.8 over the 14-30 f4, Kase does make a 112mm (I think it is) set of filters that integrate onto that 14-24's hood system. I've been told you can then use that hood onto certain other lenses, not completely sure about that and the filters would just remain on the hood. I have instead, out of those 3 you showcased, the 14-30, and use Kase's 95 mm filters with step up rings on all my lenses to do away with vignette on the 14-30. You could stick with the 14-30mm F4 and then get Viltrox's new 16mm 1.8 for Z which is a pretty good Astro lens. With what you would save a bunch on the filter prices between 95 to 112 and the price difference on moving down to f4. But people that use that 14-24 2.8z do tell me that they really love it. You seem very excited, and it is cool not to be limited with a 3 lens option.

[@tomrandall6539]

You’ve approached this in the most logical manner, with the self question of “is my gear holding me back”. It’s really the only reason to change isn’t it?! I’m still wedged on micro 43rds, no idea if I’ll switch, but I do have the opportunity to play with a Sony soon! At the end of the day does it matter? Assess needs, assess output, pick a system, and have fun with it!

[@trishf29]

There always comes a time when you need to either rethink or upgrade your tools of trade. I use an Olympus, (I’ve reached that age!) mostly with a 40-150mm lens (80-300mm equivalent) attached and have another that takes me to 400mm (800mm), plus others for macro, street etc. Can’t believe you’ve been without for so long! Have fun with your new toys, Mark!

[@photosinneighborhood]

We are the bunch who senses what we lack. I was glamorizing medium format Fuji for it’s dynamic range and superior signal to noise ratio that beats my A7rV. I am sure there are some out there who sees the advantages of A7rV over whatever they have now, haha.

[@thegorn]

Just buy both

[@MrWiseinheart]

​@@thegorntoo much.. 💰💸

[@CraigEggleton]

Thanks for affirming the 24-120 I just ordered.

[@carlmarch603]

Welcome back! Been shooting Nikon since 1978. Currently have the Z8 and two Z9s. There are some other fantastic S lenses out there, but you're fairly well covered for landscape. Nikon has been great about updating with firmware releases for the Z system, providing a lot of features while also responding to user requests. Make sure you get a CF Express card with a high sustained write speed if you're interested in maximizing the 20fps RAW or higher-end video capabilities. Enjoy!

[@cmichaelhaugh8517]

Welcome back. I bought the 24-70 2.8 when I moved from the D750 to the Z7ii. I had the 24-120 as the kit lens on my 750 and loved it. I’ll admit to missing that 71-120 piece of the range today.

[@DominikMarczuk]

The 24-120 f/4 S is by far the most versatile lens I've got so I completely understand your feelings about it. Great glass, and a great system.

[@laurelb8372]

Have loved my old Xt2 for years but since getting Z7ii am so comfortable with Nikon and the great range of lenses. Used P80, D3100, D610 then jumped to mirrorless & very happy. Great colours, easy menu, sharp images.

[@bicishoots]

I've wanted more reach on my Fuji X system for a while and almost went with the XF 100-400 but decided to go a bit crazy with the sale going on and picked up the XF 150-600. I'm glad I did, have that extra 200 mm is fun. The Nikon Z8 seems like a great setup, I'll be watching for more of those telephoto images.

[@brendenbillingsley532]

Great reasons for switching to full frame. One day I will move up to the Z line up but for now I am loving the Nikon D810 and my 16-35 f/4.

[@chrismacnaughtan4709]

I use the Z8 for seascape/ Landscape but what I really like is I can set one of the shooting banks up with subject detection for birds & it is so easy to switch over if I suddenly spot wildlife at the seaside the subject detection & tracking is excellent especially with the 100/400. It just adds another dimension at the twist of a wheel. Enjoy.

[@metalmick99]

It's very enlightening to hear your thoughts and reasoning regarding your gear, Mark. I recall the first clips I saw of you when you were considering the switch to Fujifilm's XT-4. Though I'm committed to a different brand, I may not always be. But like you, I am rather pleased to have coverage of a wide range of focal lengths without gaps. It's interesting to note some of the work by your compatriot Michael Shainblum is often taken with a 100-400 or thereabouts. It's nice to have options.

[@edwardekman9832]

Thinking positive! Welcome to the Z8 family. Best do everything camera on the market for now. You should branch out into a little bird and wildlife photography. Pretty addictive once you try!

[@JC_Hebert_artiste-photographe]

Hi Mark. Welcome back to Nikon. Been with Nikon film and digital all my life. Been using the Z8 for almost a year now and what a camera. I have the 24-120 and will be picking up the 100-400 tomorrow. Still use my AF-S lenses as I kept my D850. Look forward to seeing your work with the Z8

[@luisin69ful]

I recently bought a Z8 and the 24-120 f4 lens to shoot weddings and I love the results. I have always been a Nikon shooter and still have my D850 which is amazing as well.

[@simplysaso]

I actually switched to the Z8, 14,30, 24-120, and 100-400 based on this video! Traded in my Fuji XT5 kit with the similar lenses and man, I’ve enjoyed this camera SO much it’s ridiculous. I took both on a trip to Zion and pixel peeped some narrows photos and the Z8 just blew out the XT5 in terms of quality. Just took a while to get used to the color science. lol.

[@probably-nobody]

I actually did the opposite about a month ago and switched to GFX from full frame. I learned on film and I still cling to those old habits when composing, so high burst rates and all that aren't too appealing. Slow and calculated just makes my brain happy. The main reason has nothing to do with resolution or dynamic range. It all about the framing and the general look it gives. I don't think MF is inherently better at all. It all comes down to what works the person shooting.

[@washingtonradio]

I agree, the sensor format selected should be dictated by the person's interests and needs. None are inherently better or worse, they bring different technical advantages and limitations to the table.

[@thegorn]

Unlucky. Bet you are regretting it now.

[@probably-nobody]

@@thegorn Not at all. I definitely think I made the right choice. I was trying to say it’s just not for everybody. If you shoot wildlife, events, sports, etc. gfx is probably not a great choice. But, for someone like me it’s perfect. FWIW, I also use an x-pro, which is apsc, for most of my personal stuff. I absolutely love both, but neither is better or worse than other. They’re just wildly different.

[@jukeboxjohnnie]

GFX is the best, no question. I also have Sony 61mp as the next best thing

[@fedorvl12]

фотографировать стало слишком легко, поэтому надо искать ограничения, фотографий должно быть мало.

[@olivierdujardin8426]

I've used a Canon 6D Mark II full frame with a set of L lenses., for 5 years. I take some great shots! Never had the need to 'upgrade'. Assuming you have some form of capability to get nice photos, cameras are just a tool, use them as such. Find the right one for you considering your budget etc..., then get used to it, to never doubt your equipment, this is the best advice I can give.

[@Jeff-jg7jh]

I have watched so many vids that I should have kept a notebook. Happy to stumble across your sight again.

[@HesTallman]

Started out with a Panasonic point and shoot digital camera. After a couple of years I decided it was time to get a DSLR and after much research I settled on getting the Nikon D5100. I have used this camera since 2011, though I strayed to Fujifilm for a couple of years with the X-E1 and E3. I grew frustrated with a few idiosyncrasies and quirks of Fujifilm cameras, sold all of the Fujifilm gear I had and went back to using my D5100. I soon grew to miss composing pictures with live view and the hundreds of focus points that I had grown to like on the Fujifilm cameras. Since I was already familiar with Nikon cameras and enjoyed using them, I decided to return to mirrorless cameras and made the decision to buy a Nikon Z6II in May of this year. I haven’t used it much yet, but I think I will really like using it the more I use it. Hoping to purchase the 24-120mm lens later this year.

[@danwebbphoto]

Pulled up your video as I was setting up my brand new Z8 after shipping off my GFX back to Nikon for me too for pretty much all the reasons that you stated love Fuji, but it’s just not practical for my work anymore

[@thechurchofchristguy117]

I have a Nikon Z7ll and it is an incredible landscape camera. I have a 20 mm 1.8 a 35 mm ,1.8 85 mm 18 and a 105 mm which I think is a 2.8 the whole set up is outstanding I forgot about my 50 mm1.8

[@martinball3928]

I think what you have on trial would be a great choice. I have a Nikon Z7i with 14-30/f4, 24-120/f4 and 100-400/4.5-5.6 for landscape and general photography, and Nikon Z9 with 600/f6.3, 800/6.3 and (adapted f mount) 500/f4 for wildlife. Both of the cameras and all the lenses are superb.

[@jeffreyb.1657]

Have an X2D...my telephoto is a 200 ish too....cropping is the way forward for me.....but am no pro like you. Great video.

[@ecobooster8298]

Welcome back to Nikon. I have the Z8 and all I can say is.. WOW.. really a superb camera paired with S lenses. I still use my D810 as well. Looking forward to your new Z8 videos!!

[@FishResearch]

I have shot about ALL of the Sonys and Canons as my family owns all of those systems as well as Black magic and RED. The Z 8 is a very versatile system with several zoom lens.

[@jonreed1905]

What Camera? Currently I use Nikon Z7_2 and Z8. my lenses include 24-120 f/4, 14-24 F/2.8, 100-400 F/4.5-5.6, (the 3 mentioned in this video) Additionally , 180- 600 F/5.6-6.3, 20mm F/1.8, 24-200 F/4.0-6.3 I also have the Z 1.4 teleconverter which pairs very nicely with the 100-400. I don't really have a favorite form of photography, I like landscape, wildlife, astro, sports, and portrait (my grandkids). I used the Nikon D850 for a number of years and the only thing that could pry it from my "cold dead hand" was the Z8. I love that thing. It serves very nicely for every class I have found. Sports, wildlife, landscape, Astro (lighted buttons). I'm an old retired guy, familiarity is priceless. I know the Nikon system well, my first "nice" camera, which I still have, is a Nikon FG from 1984. I've seen folks through the years chase the hot system, I'm sticking with what I know. Right now, the only limits to what I can shoot is ME! I keep trying to improve but as you have implied, you can always get better. Thanks for your continued work, guys like me benefit from it greatly!

[@connorfernandes9439]

Nikon files are really unmatched! Welcome to the club!

[@blujeans9462]

So glad you took the plunge back to full frame. Also super happy you are leaning towards the mirrorless. I've had Nikon full frame for years - but was hesitant to go mirrorless. Once I start seeing your images, I think I'll have a better feel for whether to move to mirrorless. From what I've seen, it does not compare to DSLR in image quality - but I've got an open mind.

[@Secession1900]

I have just switched from D810 to Z6iii. The Z lenses and sensor are clearly superior in image quality to the F mount DSLRs.

[@ThierryGibralta]

Have you checked the GFX 600mm they released recently?

[@ajquestell]

Serious question because I don't know if this is how it works: Couldn't you crop in your Fuji image until you're down to the same megapixels as the Nikon (about half) and you would be getting the equivalent of 360mm (180mm x 2) with the 100-200mm?

[@jensbjorkkvist]

Nice video, i had the same journey and now starting to replacing lenses (Keeping my Z6ii for now). Keeping the Z 20mm f1.8 which is amazing for astro, just got the 14-24mm f2.8 and will go for the 24-120mm f4 soon. Later on 105mm prime and a telezoom .... just need to win the lottery first =)

[@PeterJehle100]

Nikon Z and various Nikon and Voigtlander lenses, Z8 and 24-120 is my go to most of the time. Also have X-T5 and X100VI for lighter travel.

[@Chromatomic]

That was definitely something I did before switching to the GFX which was taking stock of all my longer focal length shots and seeing if it was something I needed. For me, most of my best shots were all 200 or under so it wasn't as much of a deficit. And if I ever do something like a safari/wildlife focused trip which is rare for me I would rent gear. I do however miss the 24-105/24-120 style normal zoom which combined with a ultra wide is just a really nice 2 lens travel kit.

[@BartRos1980]

See, I wondered. I shot with the GFX system. Great colors. Great megapixels. But the Af is very limited. I switched to Nikon last year. I wondered when you would ;) welcome mark.

[@cy9nvs]

I ditched my X-H2 for the Z8 about a year ago, and it was the best decision I could've made. The Autofocus just couldn't keep up with, well, basically anything, and as a wildlife shooter, it really was a pain to work with. For landscapes, though, I would've assumed that the GFX system must be an absolute dream.

[@BerndLaukotter]

Hello Mark, you´ve taken a good choice. I´m an amateur from germany and i use Nikon cameras since 30 years. My current one is the Z7 with 4/14-30 ( a great lens), 4/24-70 (a good one, i want to move to 24-120) and the Tamron 4/70-210 (the best tele zoom i ever had). I´m waiting for the Z7 III but i propably have to wait a loooon time. Greetings from Bernd

[@robertllawrencejr5503]

I did enjoy my Nikon Cameras but I love the Fuji color. That is something that I would miss even with the Z8.

[@robertllawrencejr5503]

@@jorgepinogarciadelasbayonas that is true. I shot Nikon for a long time, but there is a difference in the sensors and how they capture light. There is something about the Fuji X-trans sensors that produces a distinct color and look in the images. I like the fuji look and feel

[@davidbogard4826]

Great bunch of lenses and you can't go wrong with the Z8. I've been using Nikons for many years going back to the F2 film camera. Currently I'm using the D800e but have my eye on the Z8. Right now I have a 16 to 35 and a 70 to 200 F4. These two can handle every situation for landscapes. But I recently got a 200 to 500 for Bird photography mostly. Keep up the great content!

[@williamchan8866]

Nice talk and nice lens choices. I’ve been doing street and architecture for quite some time….using very simple primes, 28 35 50 sometimes 20 and 24. But now I shoot mostly birds so I got the Fuji 150-600 and Nikon 500mm and 300mm…..and later hopefully a 800mm too. Even 3 years ago the thought of long lens didn’t even cross my mind……but now I see every with a different eye.

[@debramercaldo4945]

I think many of us have come to the same lens selection as you have. I use the 14-30 f4 though. It's nice to have that full range of focal lengths.

[@djtoman6875]

For the past four-plus years I have stuck with my Nikon camera bodies and lenses for stills, but for video I moved over to Fujifilm. I thought the D850 would be the last camera body I ever needed and would stick with it for years to come, but the features of the Z8 are pulling me back to 100% Nikon. I was tempted by the Z6 iii, but the video alone is not a good reason to go back down to 24.5MP and ditch Fujifilm. I've thoroughly enjoyed and appreciated what Fujifilm offers, but Nikon has done such a great job designing superb offerings for photo and video that I will be coming back home to Nikon and selling the Fujifilm gear to help offset the cost of the Z8.

[@scotthenry3904]

I tried out GFX briefly and the lack of any good tele options made me give it up. That and the lack of fast glass for portrait work.

[@KirkWilliamsonphotography]

Mark, with the Fuji X system you never had a focal range gap from 15-600 ff. 10-400 aps-c. So why did you give up on the fuji system?

[@rueldaquitan6815]

I believe you have a deeper question you want to ask Mark but you want to be nice :) I feel you. It would have been better, just my personal thought, if Mark said its a personal, subjective, decision why he switched to another system. I hope other KZbinrs would just be “raw” with their intentions. Specially if you advocate about topic of “it’s not just your gear” but much more else thing. Yet much respect to Mark. Thanks you for sharing your channel that personally helps me grow as photographer.

[@borromine]

Very interesting. A long time film shooter and architect. So GFX was a god send. For landscape I use 20-35, 35-70 and EF canon 100-400 with Fringer adapter. The 100-400 is much sharper than (my copy) gf 100-200. It is 300 grams heavier. But focuses to 36 inches so is superb for quasi macro shots. Bc I do architecture GFX is the best option for shift lenses especially wide angle ones. Personally, I have always loved medium format. Pentax 67, Arca Swiss 69 view camera. FF is great but medium format has a certain magic. I guess the lesson is always use the right tool. For portraits the GF 110 cannot be beat. And the new 30mm TSE lens appears to be one of the best of its type ever. If they will only ship it!

[@echoauxgen]

I follow you a lot and enjoy you photography, I have a nephew who uses Fuji and the colors are great because the sensor is not a Bayer. A camera is a camera and how it is used and the ease of use is the important thing. I went Sony A7s in 2014 and finally up to the A7RM5 today. I have to ask, because I do not know, But the A7RM5 has an a EV +/- 5 dial on top great for fall foliage getting cloud structure or say doing critters or birds on a sunny day to get hair/feathers cleanly and yes it has subject AF but for landscaping just over kill! There is a lens no one ever talks about but is in my every day carry bag the FE 24-240mm f3.5-6.3 OSS but in APS-C mode it is 36-360 (yes center of sensor cropped) but today with software you can enlarge also f/8 be there anyway. I have done Solar eclipse and hummingbirds to flying Egrets with sharpness to half an image cropping in focus and nesting babies being feed some 100 yards away on island in a lake. Like you there are like several 16-35mm f/4 to f/2.8, I find no difference and would use a f/4 for the longer SS you can have. For astro MW yes today you have the new 10mm f/2.8 or the 12-24mm f/2.8 just use the small 14mm f/1.8. The only thing you get with a say f/1.8 vs f/4 is a 1.8 requires a faster SS like 8s. The best advice for MW use the14mm or 16mm and do the panorama in portrait view so even MW arch in August where the top of it is way over head and beyond some getting a 200 degree panorama in less than 1 1/2 minutes doing 8 sec shots with NR is on moving with a stepper base to next spot while in NR mode. Even the 24mm f/1.4 could do it. The fast glass is not needed for that narrow FOV when you just use the little square for focus for you get FOV with great bokeh EVEN with the 24-240 even at 360mm. Most all this you never do but in the beginning my A7S was like night vison and using a 16-35mm f/4 captured the MW in a dark sky with city glow behind . With OSS lenses I could do anything in day light handheld. The king of sharpness even today is the A7RM2 where I did captures bracketed 3 at +/- 2ev hand held with the 12-24mm f/4 in antelope canyon when all others DSLR's in 2017 were on sticks even most today still on sticks in dim lighting. Today many Canon/Nikon users are having to sell their collection of lens with their cameras when they go mirrorless. All this just info just give it a look. A little secret lens is the super small OSS lens that is a APS-C is the E 10-18m (15-27mm) BUT will work in 12-18mm in Full Frame yes f/4 but a 25s capture with pin point stars in the corners, I still carry in a pocket of my sling bag just incase but ready!!!!!

[@jefffenske1958]

If you want more depth of field while shooting the GFX for some shots for wide angle, all Canon EF lenses can be used with an adapter in the 35mm crop mode, which will give the same results as FF, but with more pixels. And if you use the entire sensor of the GFX, you're not stuck in 3:2, but can use any aspect ratio. Though, probably only square and 65:24 will not vignette. So it's hard to compose shots in the other aspect ratios, because Fuji doesn't give us enough cropping options for 35mm lenses. Would be very nice if they added more to get the most out of full frame lenses on the GFX. For astro, all SLR extreme wide angle lenses can be used with an adaptor, but the petal shaped lens hood needs to be cut off by a camera repair shop, which I had done. Then we're no longer stuck in 3:2, and can even shoot in 1:1 using the entire lens circle of our 35mm lenses!

[@jefffenske1958]

Removing the rear baffle (easily pulled out) also increases the angle of view for SLR wide angle lenses (in those I've tried), but they won't cover the entire medium format sensor.

[@eavilev]

I've been a bit frustrated also by the lack of long lenses for the GFX. There seems to be an abundance of MAMIYA-SEKOR C 150mm F4 MAMIYA-SEKOR longer lenses available on eBay. Had you tried any? Are they a possible solution to the limitations you spoke?

[@317Media_Indy]

I get the move decision. I still am using the Fuji. For my real estate photo/video I use the X-H2s and for landscape/Portraits I'm using the GFX 100 II. The focus is great on the 100 II. Not FF great, but very reliable. Fujifilm really missed the mark with the recent 500mm lens. They would be much better served with a GFX 100-400 F4 type lens. I'm not in a mountain area and do hotshot wildlife, so the long is a lesser need for me. But, IMHO that 100-400 f4 is critical for the GFX line.

[@ScottThomasPhoto]

I loved the 24-120 f/4 on my Nikon D750 and got the Z version when I went with a Z9. Will like to get a wider lens so will look into the 14-24 f/2.8 you enjoyed.

[@boristahmasian9604]

Good choice Mark. I can see your logic for the switch. I think Nikon is the system to beat today. I chose Sony about two years ago because Tamron was making a good selection of lenses for the platform giving me a solid option compared to Sony's more expensive glass. GFX platform, because of the cost and limited lens selection was never a consideration. If I started over today, I would go with a Z8 and 24-120 as my first lens followed by a wide zoom and a long zoom.

[@fotografalexandernikolis]

The thing I find strange with medium format is how despite the sensor being larger, there are so few f1.4 equivalent lenses. GFX has what, two f1.7 (1.4 equiv) lenses? Yet they are larger and more expensive than equivalent FF 1.4 lenses, while FF systems have dozens. Like the GFX 110 f2 is equivalent to FF 87mm f1.6 and weighs 1kg, yet actual 85mm 1.4 lenses are lighter despite their larger entrance pupil. And for not much more weight you can buy the 85 1.2 S which for FF would require f1.5 for the same rendition. This essentially means that medium format can't completely leverage the large sensor advantage for short DOF and light gathering as it technically should be able to. So if one can live with a bit worse resolution and dynamic range, FF systems indeed are the sweet spot. Especially when factoring in just how much faster focusing modern FF systems are for wildlife, events, etc.

[@paulbenoit249]

All a matter of compromises and personal preferences. Done the exact opposite, sold all my Nikon gear to go Hasselblad full blast (25mm, 38mm, 90mm): what you gain in image quality you lose in versatility - lens FL coverage. Bad thing about MF remains the overall cost though. A body and 3 lenses set me back a good 22k$, very tough pill to swallow. The Nikon equivalent would have been about 1/3 of this.

[@stevenwaldstein2249]

Recently thought about trying out MF since I’ve shot full frame with film and digital for my entire life with APS-C sprinkled here and there. Well I think I’m going to hold since between Sony and Canon I’ve got it covered. Did retry Nikon but at the time they only had the Z9 and no smaller high quality cameras like the Z8 to use with it. Did own all Z S lenses you mentioned and they were great but don’t have it any more. So these days for landscape I’m using a Sony A7RV with the 16-35/2.8 GM, 24-70/2.8 GM, 24-105/4 G, and 100-400mm GM. With Canon for landscape I’m using the RF 15-35/2.8L, RF 24-70/2.8L, RF 24-105/4L, and RF 100-500mm L. Do miss rage Nikon Z 24-120/4 S though. Thank you and take care.

[@paulaquipel7472]

Nice Mark, Z system is awesome I think the shadow recovery is even better. 24-120z is an awesome travel lens to! Enjoyed the video. Your images are 🔥

[@DennisBater]

the shadow recovery may be good but not as good as a GFX series of cameras.

[@marxphotography]

Did you ever consider adapting the EF 100-400 for GFX? I know several people who run that lens on the 100s and say its fantastic and theres little to no vignetting.

[@richyw959]

And then Fuji goes and releases the GF 500 f5.6, by all accounts a fantastic lens.

[@MarkDenneyPhoto]

a fantastic, huge telephoto prime

[@cbarkerphoto]

I've loved my Z8, its a great system. I have the 14-24, but found myself more enjoying the 14-30 + 20mm f1.8 for astro. This eliminates my need for the 112 filters (which are huge) and allows me to use the same filter (82mm with 77 step up) set across my 14-30, 24-120, 100-400 and others easily, while still having the 20mm 1.8 for astro. No wrong answers, like I said, the whole system is great, but just thought I'd share my lens experience. see you in dolomites this fall btw! :)

[@SDA-Sound]

So get an adapter and put your telephoto on it?

[@azzkhan8746]

Nice one.. new journey for sure. I fixed my long lens solution for gfx100 by getting a canon ef100-400 with a auto focus adapter. And a 1.4x adapter. No more long lens issue and all the medium format goodness. I also own a Fuji xt5 for my new street photography genre and I can use the canon lens with it to if I really wanted a super reach I.e 900mm reach with 1.4x adapter. High resolution fast crop sensor for street. And mega resolution medium format for landscape. Very practical setup which I am loving.

[@jrperezphotography]

Thank you for the video. Are you going to switch out of the Fujifilm Xt5 system also?

[@MarkDenneyPhoto]

Not right away, but possibly in the future.

[@Razor2048]

Wouldn't it be difficult make due with such a large drop in image resolution? Even 100 megapixels is still a fairly low resolution, thus going lower seems like it would be frustrating, especially dropping to 45.7 megapixels. Beyond that, the Z8 should offer vastly improved auto focus, thus if while doing some landscape photography, if you see a really cute fox, deer, mountain lion, or other extremely cute animals, you will have a better chance at getting a good photo of them.

[@cameraman763]

2 questions. 1-did you look at the new GF 500mm? 2- I am a Fuji XF shooter with both the XH2s and XT5. Fortunately I have both the 100-400 and the newer 150-600. But feel like I’m lacking other focal length options and better eye detect for animals. So I have been thinking about the Nikon Z8 also and their lens options. You said you were excited about the Z system setup. But is it significantly better/different than the XF options? How much would I miss the 1.5 crop factor for wildlife. Thanks.

[@jukeboxjohnnie]

Why not keep both?, ive M43, FF and GFX they all have different strengths. Id have added in a 61mp Sony camera for when you want lots of DOF for those landscape shots theyre also small and compact for a backpack getting to your location

[@gsrox2007]

GAS is inevitable. Without GAS there won't be anything to talk about for a photography/videography KZbin channel. Z8 is great and it is good to see Nikon back. Pentax is also back and Panasonic is back with the GH7. Sony's monopoly is over!

[@craigcarlson4022]

Welcome back to the Nikon world!

[@johnnolte9466]

I use a canon r6 with a 16 to35 & a 100/400 both ef lenses with adapter.

[@luisv8431]

You are using the wrong software with Fuji, did you try C1?

[@slowlyrusting4044]

Nikon has been with me from the start. F2, N8008s, F5, D7000, D750 (a terrific astro body) and currently Z8. I too currently own the 14-24, 24-120 and 100-400. Send B and H your $$$ Mark, you won't be disappointed.

[@nrice3623]

How do you like the Z8 vs. your D750? (Control layout, also image quality & dynamic range). I'm debating the Z8 or Z6iii. I'd prefer the Z8 screen...but don't really NEED 45 MP.

[@slowlyrusting4044]

@@nrice3623 I absolutely love the Z8. I have made 24x30, and larger, prints from both bodies and the extra resolution on the Z8 definitely beats the D750 especially when cropping "smaller" images from the original. I don't think I actually NEED 45 MP but I am really happy having them.

[@akoskiss7320]

Add a 9mm f/5.6 7artisans lens for even more ooomph! ;)

[@davidwalker2402]

I kind of thought the same as you. I have been using the GFX 100 and now GFX 100 11 for a number of years now, but with all the new hype about FF and 60 fps I decided to buy a Leica SL3 it would also give me more options for longer focal lengths , but I have found that after 2 months I still prefer the GFX , I think it has something FF can’t offer particularly for landscape. It’s hard to put your finger on exactly what it is but I found using FF again just convinced me Medium Format just has something different than the norm. “I think 😂” good luck with the new system…😊

[@thomastuorto9929]

Better hurry while Nikon has their sale on!

[@augustoliver2779]

Not a lot of people talk about Nikon.

[@jonglaser4468]

Welcome to the Dark Side. I use my 100-400 50% of the time now shooting landscapes here in colorado

[@davidblack2632]

Good video. Some good reasonable logic.

[@ahmedawad563]

The 24-120mm f/4 S lens is the best lens for landscape photography. Period.

[@moonchai152]

I think full frame format is the best choice. In fact, beginners, amateurs, and normal photographers prefer to use Z8. Medium format is only for a real pro and high amateurs. I mainly use Canon and FUJI GFX.

I personally switched to a Sony system. A7r5 with 60 mp sensor. They do have great lenses.

[@dougheizenrader2280]

Interesting that you are giving up on medium format, over focal length range, just when Fuji is coming out with a 500mm lens.

[@RogerHyam]

Back in the 1980/90s every jobbing press photographer had two film bodies round their neck, one long telephoto zoom and one very wide zoom. With this combination they could create something for their editors even with the most mundane subjects. The more pictures they got in the paper the better. This is therefore what most KZbin landscape photographers gravitate to. They need to produce content continuously, even if they are in uninspiring locations. They are pro photographers not "artists" in that sense. Why not go out with a single camera and prime lens and see what the world looks like with that in your hand?

[@ilanhoward]

Have you considered the Sony A7RV?

[@JeffreyTadlockPhotography]

I love my Nikon setup for landscape photography. I use the Z7 II, 14-30, 24-120, and 100-400! Makes for a great setup!

[@baobo67]

Me too Jeff, Z6 II and 24-120 F4 is my go to set up. So versatile. Saving my drachmas for the 35mm 1.8 S but their there is 1,4 and 1,2 coming I hear, Mine is mainly Street, Will see Cheers

[@DaveBerthiaume]

My exact setup too. Also have the 20mm f/1.8 for astro. Very happy with this setup.

[@JeffreyTadlockPhotography]

@@baobo67 Definitely a versatile setup! A 35mm prime would probably be amazing for street photography!

[@JeffreyTadlockPhotography]

@@DaveBerthiaume If I did more astro, I'd have my eye on that 20mm 1.8 as well!

[@nickcarneyphotography]

I have the same setup but 20 1.8 swapped for 14-30. Don’t shoot much wide and love it for Astro. It’s a truly great setup.

[@Trish12303]

I have been shooting Nikon since 1997. I hung in there even through their years that they were behind in technology. I have always loved my cameras and lenses, including my Z8. It is an amazing camera. I splurged on the Plena lens, the two paired together create some beautiful images. You will love the Z8!!

[@patricksmith2553]

Same here, but I actually started with the Nikon N90s and F5 in around 1995? Than in late 1999 or early 2000 I switched to the Nikon D1. I’ve had every flagship from D1-D6, and even all of the X/S models as well! Anyways, I agree about the telephoto aspect of the situation/video. As I’ve even used my old 800mm f/5.6E FL a few times for some landscapes. Including an all time favorite image of mine, it’s of the full moon, just as it’s rising above snow-capped mountains. It was sunset and so the mountains were pinkish/red and lit up so beautifully! It’s a single exposure as well, I don’t ever manipulate or composite images. So I was able to use the D850’s amazing dynamic range to get it right in-camera with a single shot. Just as Mark said in the video, it’s easy to get great single image captures. You don’t really need to bracket or composite/focus stack images with full frame. Anyways I think Mark is making a great decision and one I definitely would’ve made as well. The Z8 will definitely open those doors that were closed, it’ll give you everything you need, especially with those three lenses! You really can’t beat the 14-24mm, 24-120mm and 100-400mm’s…as a do-it-all combo! I personally don’t ever really need wider than 24mm, but I absolutely love the 24-120mm f/4 and the 100-400mm especially! They’re two of the best zoom lenses ever made and the both absolutely destroy the competition! Canon, Sony, Fuji and nobody else can touch those two zooms from Nikon. Canon has an amazing EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS II and I hear their 100-500mm is not bad, but the Nikon definitely has the edge! It’s built better, made in Japan and just feels very well built. Plus it’s both sharper than the Canon and has a better zoom/aperture range in my opinion. Sure you loose 100mm compared to the Canon 100-500mm, but you can crop and or use a 1.4x TC and have the best of both worlds! Anyways I’ve contemplated switching to this same setup, minus the 14-24mm. However there’s just a few things holding me back. I’m mainly a photojournalist/newspaper photographer, but I also do wildlife, nature/landscape and aviation. So I need a great low light camera and a great super-tele prime and or zoom! So I have the Nikon D6’s as main cameras and the D850 (with grip kit) as my backup. Although I like the Z8 and Z9, I just don’t prefer their high ISO performance compared to my D6’s. I also am not a fan of EVF’s and poor battery life. I’ve gotten so used to the flagship DSLR’s that I’m spoiled, and my battery lasts forever! Like at least a week, instead of a few hours, like with a Z8/Z9! Plus I have light sensitivity due to cluster headaches and the OVF is way better than an EVF. I’m hoping the Z6 III may have improved on the EVF enough for it to work for me. Plus although I don’t like the small size, the Z6 III is much closer to my D6 as a replacement than the Z8 is! I mean that in a low-light, frames per second and overall specs way, obviously not quite same size/weight or build quality wise. Long story short is I’ve had the Z9 and a Z7 and they’re both great, but I couldn’t live wit the ISO performance or EVF’s. Yet I do miss my Z-mount 24-120mm f/4 S and 100-400mm lenses, so we’ll see where I go. Honestly I’m perfectly content using my D6’s/D850 until Nikon releases a flagship with better EVF, better battery life and maybe lower megapixels. Or maybe, just maybe I’ll be switching to Canon. I like the R3’s EVF in its OVF simulation mode, much better than the Z9/Z8’s EVF. Plus the R3 is almost perfect for me specs wise and for what I do. Luckily my news organization has both Nikon NPS and Canon/CPS accounts! So I’m able to test the gear and we get pretty decent discounts on gear and repairs. Canon is rumored to be announcing an RF 200-500mm f/4 IS and the R1. Right now my bread and butter lenses are the Nikon 500mm f/4 FL and the 180-400mm f/4 FL 1.4x TC. So a 200-500mm f/4…would be photographic gear heaven for me!

[@sheeshia]

​@@patricksmith2553 what's so bad about Z8/Z9's high ISO performance? I had a D850 and i was complaining nonstop about its poor high ISO performance until it came to a point where i thought to myself, if i'm not going to print big for viewers to notice the noise, who cares. I've recently watched Simon d'Entremont's video on youtube entitled "the truth about shooting at ISO 100..." and it's comforting to know that it's not the photographer/camera's fault that an image is noisy/grainy. As long as your main subjects are well exposed and focused, nobody cares what ISO values you use. My gear history for entertainment purpose: Lumix point and shoot -> D90 -> D300S -> D800 -> D500-> D850 -> Fuji XT3 -> Z9. There's only the Z9 now that I use and i love it. Sorry for my bad english. It's not my first language. I meant no disrespect to you in my comment. Please let me know if i have offended you in any way and i'll humbly apologise.

[@patricksmith2553]

@@sheeshia No worries. So as I said I’m a long time photojournalist. I shoot a lot in low light, even in near pitch darkness. From breaking news like fires to high school sports and everything in-between. Often I don’t know where I’ll be shooting and for how long. Sometimes I’ll cover wildfires that last days or weeks. I might be shooting on a hillside or mountain at midnight. Where there is only moon light or ambient light, and that’s where my D6’s really shine. The viewfinder is extremely bright on the D6 and the autofocus is absolutely amazing. Plus the sensor in the D5/D6 are plainly better at higher ISO’s compared to the D850/Z7/Z8/Z9. The D5/D6 have a sensor that’s tuned or design for high ISO performance! I’d say I notice at least 2/3rd’s of a stop or a full stop difference. In reality though it’s more than just the measurable difference. Due to the smaller megapixel count of 20.8mp the D5/D6 have larger individual pixels. The D6 also retains color, contrast and fine details better at high ISO’s as well vs. the Z8/Z9. However from base ISO64 to about ISO400…the 45.7mp, like the D850/Z8 and Z9 cameras have an advantage with dynamic range. Unfortunately the D5/D6 suffer or sacrifice a little bit of dynamic range to achieve better high ISO performance! It also comes down to things like post processing and time. In my business time is everything and being first to get images out, can be the difference. With the Z8/Z9 files I found myself spending more time running noise reduction and file reductions to compensate for the higher noise. The more steps or time involved in post production is a downside to me. Also the D5/D6 files take noise reduction really well. I don’t know if it’s just due to the larger pixels/lower megapixel count or the “noise pattern.” Yet I’ve noticed the D6 files just look much better after noise reduction vs. the Z9 type cameras. Also in reality I just don’t really need the 45.7mp and or the ability to crop much. I can cover almost every focal length with my lenses and they’re all extremely sharp. I have made many prints comparing my D5/D6 images to D850/Z7 and or Z9 images and nobody can tell the difference. The majority of image quality is thanks to your lens and its abilities. What I’m saying is I’m getting the most out of my 20.8mp sensor due to my lenses amazing sharpness/IQ. So as far as detail and overall image quality is concerned the higher megapixel cameras don’t do much for me. As long as I can fill the frame with my lower megapixel camera…I’m getting great results with my lenses. Plus cropping results in more noise or at least makes the noise more pronounced. So I try to only crop when I need to and usually only 10-30% or so, depending on the situation/image. No camera is perfect though and there’s always trade-offs to be made. I’m not saying the Z8/Z9 has bad image quality or can’t be used at higher ISO’s. I’m just saying for what I do, which is a niche thing…the D6 is just better for me. For 95% of photographers the D850 or Z7/Z8/Z9’s are the right choice and best cameras available. Just to demonstrate how niche my needs are, I’ll tell you Nikon easily sells 30-40x more Z8’s and Z9’s vs. D6’s! I know because I handle most of the gear at a large news outlet and I know the serial numbers well. I’ve seen Z9’s made for the USA with serial numbers in the 3041000 territory or 41,000 units sold. Whereas my highest serial number on a Nikon D6 is just above 3002000, or just 2,000 sold nationwide. I’m sure by now there’s 45,000 or so Z9’s in the USA and only about 2,200 D6’s and this is a big country! Most of the people who own the D6 are news/sports photographers or “photojournalists” and a few are wildlife photographers. I know some wildlife photographers who prefer using the Nikon D6 or Canon 1Dx Mark III or R3’s and Sony A9 II/III’s. Most also own a Z8/Z9 or Canon R5/Sony A1 and they use whichever suits their needs best. I too did for a long time and still do, because I like having the best of both worlds. I can use the D850 or a Z9 for when I’m in good lighting and or need the ability to crop, or I can use the D6 for low light and night shooting. Anyway…you didn’t offend me and I’m sure you’d admit that your needs are probably pretty different to mine? You probably aren’t photographing firefighters or Police in the middle of the night? Plus I’ll add this as well…the D6 is amazing camera in almost every way. It works just like the Z9 as far touch menu and ability to highly customize it. I can for instance just flick up with my finger and wirelessly send images to my laptop/iphone with my D6. I use the WT-6 transmitters and they have a 650ft range and are 100% reliable. I can send my images within 2 seconds and have them published or to my editors within a minute or less, 2 minutes at most! While the Z8/Z9 have wireless built in…it sucks, it has terrible range and it’s not 100% reliable either. Unfortunately Nikon got rid of the port or connection point for the WT-6 on the Z9. So you’re limited to using the built in wireless, which is slower and more difficult to use at times. This is something I use everyday and therefor is a key factor or reason while I prefer the D6 to the Z9. I was probably one of the first non-Nikon ambassadors to have the Z9’s in my hands. Usually the media/press and important NPS clients get the new cameras and lenses first. So I did have an early copy of the Z9 and Lightroom and apparently there was an issue where the noise performance was worse than it is now. Which to me sorta proves that Nikon and or Lightroom is processing the images somewhere to help with the noise. Or maybe it was just a bug, but trust me the D6 is probably the best high ISO performer in the world. Some 24mp cameras come close noise performance wise, but the D6 still has a slight edge.

[@sheeshia]

@@patricksmith2553 thank you for the lengthy reply. I guess we use whatever works best in our line of work. I shoot mostly landscapes and portraits so the z9 really gives me more than enough details to keep me busy. I loved the fujifilm and how easy it was for me to make changes on the go, plus the light weight bodies. I switched back to Nikon for one reason only, the fujifilm failed me in accurate AF nearly 10% all the time. It can be very frustrating whenever i use modelling lights in the studio. So, i thought maybe it's time to make the switch and give Nikon another chance. I say this because their DSLR failed me many times (autofocus wise) and the lenses always had back/front focusing issues. So, Nikon mirrorles. Let's see. Tried other brands as well such as Sony and Canon but i just like how the Nikon feels in my hands. Working on the menu is easy as well since i am familiar with it. Never liked the menus by Sony and Canon. The z9 surely is heavier to carry around but it gives me exactly what i need in my work. And that AF accuracy on the Z9 is really amazing for me even though i know that Sony and Canon AF are slightly better. Anyway, that's my short and boring story. Thank you for taking the time to read and for the reply.

[@patricksmith2553]

@@sheeshia Yeah no problem and I totally get why you’re using a Z9! If my focus or work was portraits and landscapes, I’d also definitely get a Z8/Z9. They are definitely superior to even my D6 when it comes to eye-AF tracking and face tracking is slightly better. The D6 can find and focus on faces quite well and even eyes, in fact it’s the only DSLR with the ability to track eyes. However it’s definitely not as accurate or good as the latest mirrorless options! Heck it might not even be as good as the older Z6/Z7’s after their firmware updates. However for me that function is not as important and I rarely use it. As far as back/front focusing and issues with autofocus on DSLR’s I think you just had bad luck. I know you’re not alone and I’ve heard and seen others having those issues as well. So I totally get how frustrating that could be, but I personally haven’t had those issues. Although it is true that Nikon/NPS give us news/media companies and customers the cream of the crop. First off we have a long standing relationship and but a lot of gear and need a lot of service and support. So I’m well aware Nikon is (most likely) cherry picking the best lenses and cameras for us. I’m sure they’ve double/triple checked everything works great. So it makes sense in a way why I’ve not experienced any real issues like that. The only time I did have an issue was with a brand new Nikon 105mm f/1.4E, which had lots of internal dust. Right out of the box I went to put a new Nikon 82mm NC/UV filter on it and I noticed the dust, it was really bad. The entire large front grouping of lens elements had dust covering the entire surface area. Plus the sharpness and contrast wasn’t what I was expecting and so I returned it and instead kept using my 70-200mm f/2.8E FL. Which sorta brings me back to my point about Nikon giving us the best gear. There is sample variation with some lenses and I’ve seen this specifically on the 24-70mm f/2.8E VR and 70-200mm f/2.8E FL lenses. All of the copies we had… which we got through NPS, were extremely sharp and spot-on AF wise. When I sold some of them to people (after we were done with them) in order to help with budgeting for new mirrorless gear, I became aware of the issues. A couple of the buyers of our used pool equipment said they had looked at other copies of the same lenses and had passed on buying them. They said this was due to sample variation issues. Such as they were not sharp wide open or had de-centered lens elements and or AF issues, etc.! Whereas our copies were perfect or very close to it. They literally told me they were night and day differences, especially in the case of those two particular lenses, which opened my eyes. In my 27 years of shooting Nikon professional gear I had never had any issues. Never needed a single repair, never had any AF issues or anything. So there must be a reason or maybe it’s also just good luck? I mean not everything I own or have bought was through NPS. I’ve bought used gear and personal gear on my own, but obviously I know what to check for. Anyways, it was nice talking to you and I’m glad you’re satisfied with your Nikon gear. It’s also good to know that there’s less issues with AF and sample variation on the Z-lenses. Yet at the same time I’m not impressed with the recalls on the Z8/Z9’s and quality issues. Everyone I know who has either camera has had to send them into Nikon for service/recalls multiple times. Yet in my 24 years shooting Nikon flagship level DSLR’s, from D1 to D6 I’ve yet to need a single repair! Maybe the difference is partly made in Japan vs. Thailand and now China? The 105mm f/1.4E that I had the dust issue with was made in China. I doubt you’d ever see dust like that in a lens made in Japan. I know I had never seen that before and never heard of it, so I personally believe it matters in some cases. Obviously some products are very well made in China, such as Apple products or even the Nikon 800mm f/6.3pf! Generally though I do think the gear made in Japan has a leg up. Especially the flagship DSLR’s and super-tele primes and zooms. I’ve compared the 800pf to my 500FL and there are clear differences in build quality. Same with the Z9, it’s not quite as well made as the D6. I mean the difference(s) are small, but they’re there. It seemed to me the Z9 was in small ways like a D850/Z7 II mixed with a D6. Absolutely professional build quality and very well made, but just a tad behind the D6. Hence the price difference at launch, with the Z9 being $1,000 cheaper than the D6? I don’t know, that’s a whole another conversation. Plus I’m taking about very minor differences! Take care!

[@JasonLorette]

Yay! Welcome back to NIKON (maybe)! (Another creator I follow that is now on Nikon like me)...Z8 is a fabulous camera. Honestly my 24-120mm f4 is my favourite lens, and like you said pretty much lives on my camera most of the time. The 100-400 I hear is a fabulous lens...and will likely be the next one I buy after I get my new Z6III.

[@JordanCS13]

I switched to Nikon last summer from the Canon R5 and I agree about the 24-120. I’ve used a ton of standard lenses over the years and it’s my favorite one. So good at all focal lengths, almost completely flare resistant too. I also have the 14-24, which is phenomenal.

[@JasonLorette]

@@JordanCS13 the 24-120 is such a great lens…on my camera pretty much constantly. 📸😎

[@es0terra]

Welcome to the team Mark. Your lens choices 14-24-120-400 is excellent. You may want to also consider the 180-600. Also, try using a linear profile and you will start to uncover the true dynamic range of the Z8 stacked sensor. I often only need one image (+1 EV exposing to the right) for all of my high contrast images, no blending, with no artifacts or noise.

[@Lekis504]

Hey, can you explain the “linear profile” part please? I tried looking it up without success. Thanks!

[@sequoi_]

This is just a guess, but in Capture One you can change camera profiles or if you’re familiar with Fuji systems, film sims. One of the options is Linear Profile. It’s essentially the raw file with no film sims or profiles that essentially are editing your photo for you.